In this workshop (Master in Translational Medicine-MSc, University of Barcelona's Faculty of Medicine-Hospital Clínic, 14 March 2018) I summarised the benefits which can be gained from use of social media (specially blogs, Twitter and other socialnetwork sites) to support research activities, and I provided examples of these innovative emerging resources as tools for scientific communication related to translational medicine, as well as discussed their implications for digital scholarship. Structure of the lecture: Introduction, Altmetrics, Active listening, Blogging, Microblogging, Networking, Sharing, Health 2.0, Resources, The ten commandments, References To deepen, Conclusions
Spermiogenesis or Spermateleosis or metamorphosis of spermatid
Science dissemination 2.0: Social media for researchers
1. Master in Translational Medicine-MSc
University of Barcelona, 14 March 2018
Science
dissemination 2.0
Social media for researchers
Xavier Lasauca i Cisa
@xavierlasauca
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jasonahowie/8583949219/in/gallery-davidmbusto-72157668330325270/
4. • To get new information
• To increase the impact and visibility of research
papers
• To engage with fellow researchers and meet new
collaborators
• To improve a researcher's public profile, build your on
line reputation and thus competitiveness
• As part of the research process
Using social media can be really beneficial:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/mkhmarketing/8540717756
26. Track the dissemination of research beyond
academia
Show the attention, reception, and response to a
published work prior to it being cited
Can be applied to non-traditional research outputs
like data-sets and blog posts
Show research impact in real-time — scholars and
journals don’t have to wait for their score to be
released, like in the Journal Citation Reports
Source: Enter Alternative Metrics: Indicators that capture the value of research and richness of
scholarly discourse
https://www.flickr.com/photos/nirak/512878595
27.
28. • Adams J, Loach T. (2015). Altmetric mentions and the
communication of medical research.
• Maggio LA, Leroux T, Meyer HS, Artino AR. (2018).
Exploring the relationship between altmetrics and
traditional measures of dissemination in health professions
education.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/interactive-content/29441904066/
References
42. Motive A: Visibility Motive B: Networking Motive C: Information
increase own impact connect with peers be up to date
be found by peers and
other stakeholders
stay in touch with
colleagues
be part of a conversation
present self/own work
be(come) part of a
community
anticipate trends
Source: (Micro)blogging Science? Notes on Potentials and Constraints of New Forms of Scholarly Communication, by Cornelius
Puschmann
44. It increases your visibility within academia.
It increases your visibility outside academia.
It increases your visibility more than a static
site.
It’s a great way of making connections.
It makes it easier for people to find your
published work.
It’s a great way to promote events and call
for papers.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/anonymouscollective/4263193267
48. “The purpose of keeping the blog is to give me a semi-public
place to describe the ongoing process of doing and thinking
about my lab’s research. I hope I’ll use it to describe or
explain (mainly to myself) the scientific issues I'm
thinking about:
- what experimentswe’ve done
- what the resultswere if they worked (or possible
explanations for why they didn’t work)
- what experiments I think we might do or should do
when time and resources permit.”
Rosemarie (‘Rosie’) Redfield
56. • LSE Impact Blog. (2012, February 24). Five minutes with Patrick
Dunleavy and Chris Gilson: “Blogging is quite simply, one of the most
important things that an academic should be doing right now”. [Blog
post].
• Dunleavy, P. (2014, December 28). Shorter, better, faster, free: Blogging
changes the nature of academic research, not just how it is
communicated [Blog post].
• Dunleavy, P. (2016, January 25). How to write a blogpost from your
journal article in eleven easy steps. [Blog post].
• Mollett A., Brumley C., Gilson C., Williams S. (2017, May 25). So you’ve
decided to blog? These are the things you should write about. [Blog
post].
http://maxpixel.freegreatpicture.com/Internet-Report-Information-Blogging-Blogger-Blog-970722
References
68. A player more with pulmonary embolism? Teletovic,
Varejão, Mickel... Tall players, lot of flights... Are they a risk
group? #basketball #pulmonary
69.
70. Is there anything as rewarding for a researcher as
responding to a hypothesis in a short time?
71.
72.
73. Except for the very end
of this process –
submitting the paper to
the journal for peer-
review – none of this
way of working bears
the least bit of
resemblance to how I
was trained to be a
scholar.
Source: Using Social Media to Enhance Your
Research Activities, by Brian Kelly
76. It’s a great way to get information you otherwise wouldn’t
At conferences, Twitter is invaluable for stimulating
discussion and finding out what is happening in other
sessions
For lecturers, Twitter can contribute to discussions and
deepen understanding
The way we translate information is changing
https://www.flickr.com/photos/47400163@N05/7846842772
79. Using Twitter, you can join conversations with other
delegates
Delegates write short comments and quote speakers and
you can ask for clarification, ask questions, offer opinions
and thoughts
Even if you’re not at the conference, you can still be
involved
https://www.flickr.com/photos/47400163@N05/7846842772
Twitter in Conferences
86. • Wheeler, T. (2015, August 21). Permission to tweet? The
underlying principles of good science communication are
all about sharing. [Blog post].
• Haustein, S. & Costas, R. (2015) Identifying Twitter
audiences: who is tweeting about scientific papers?
• Ortega, JL. (2017, December 4). Academic journals with a
presence on Twitter are more widely disseminated and
receive a higher number of citations. [Blog post].
References
95. Articles and presentations
(Slideshare, issuu)
Social bookmarking (Delicious, Diigo)
Images (flickr, Instagram) and videos
(YouTube)
Bibliographic data management
(Zotero, Mendeley)
Video chats (Skype, Google hangouts)
107. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=25124281
Based on
observations in this
study and the
increased usage of
social media, we
posit that online
illness reports could
complement
traditional
surveillance systems
by providing near
real-time
information on
foodborne illnesses,
implicated foods
and locations.
116. Strategy
• Define objectives about online presence
(as individual researcher or research group)
• Explore the tools and choose the most
appropriate
• Develop your network
• Encourage feedback and discussion
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ybot84/7850997682/
118. 10 Simple Steps to Building a Reputation
as a Researcher, in Your Early Career
1. Register for an ORCID identifier
2. Register for information hubs: LinkedIN, Slideshare, and a domain name of your
own
3. Register for Twitter
4. Write and share a 1-paragraph bio
5. Describe your research program in 2 paragraph
6. Create a CV and share it
7. Share (on Twitter & LinkedIN) news about something you did or published; an
upcoming event in which you will participate; interesting news and publications in
your field
8. Make writing; data; publication; software available as Open Access
9. Set up tracking of your citations, mentions, and topics you are interested in using
Google scholar and Google alert,
10. Find your Klout score, H-index.
Source:MicahAltman,sBlog
http://nepalireporter.com/21956/paul-van-dyk-returns-uae/
119. Top 10 tips to get started
1. Explore online guides (start with this).
2. Do some “lurking” (look at examples of good practice).
3. Locate pertinent and relevant online sources (e.g. who to follow on
Twitter, interesting bloggers).
4. Start using content aggregation and curation tools (e.g. RSS, Diigo).
5. Identify a few key tools and start with those – know your limits!
6. Develop your network (e.g. LinkedIn, Twitter).
7. Join academic social network sites (e.g. ResearchGate, Mendeley).
8. Create your own website
9. Start blogging and twittering about your research (or whatever else
takes your fancy!).
10. Keep your purpose and audience in mind.
Source:IntroductiontoSocialMediaforresearchers,byGillesCouzin
http://www.forbes.com/pictures/eeel45jfeg/1-tiesto-22-million/
125. • Konkiel, S. (2016, July 8). A ‘quick and dirty’ guide to building
your online reputation. [Blog post]
• Innovations in Scholarly Communication. Universiteit Utrecht.
• Social media en investigación. Lydia Gil.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/frosch50/21492514468
126. • Public Consultation: ‘Science 2.0’: Science in Transition
European Commission. 2014
• Emerging reputation mechanisms for scholars
European Commission. 2015
• Making Open Science a Reality
OECD. 2015
• Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World: a vision
for Europe
European Commission. 2016
• Next generation metrics
European Commission. 2017
https://www.flickr.com/photos/european_parliament/10943216394
131. Because
sharing isn’t
just nice; it’s
absolutely
critical.
Terry Wheeler
xavierlasauca.cat
https://www.flickr.com/photos/eightysixfilms/6176735010/