2. AIMS
• TO DISCUSS VIEWS OF MENTALIST & BEHAVIOURISM
• TO DISCUSS CHOMSKY’S UNDERLYING KNOWLEDGE
3. MENTALISM & BEHAVIOURISM
• MENTALISM ; ONE HAS MIND AND BODY WHICH ARE INTERDEPNDENT
mind
stimuli
world
respons
e
4. • HOWEVER, MIND SOMETIMES ACTS NATURALLY (WITHOUT AFFECTING BY
OTHERS) FREE WILL
• THIS ENABLES ONE TO RECOGNISE NONSENSICAL SENTENCES, EG;
• THE IDEA OF SQUARE IS PURPLE
• HAPPINESS WEIGHS THREE GRAMS
5. • ALL MENTALISTS BELIEVE THAT MIND EXISTS
• MIND INCLUDES IDEAS AND KNOWLEDGE
• HOWEVER, THEY HAVE DIFFERENT VIEWS ON HOW THE IDEAS ARE EMBODIED IN
MIND (NEXT SLIDE)
7. RATIONALISM
TRADITIONAL RATIONALIST;
• PLATO (4TH CENTURY BC)
• DESCARTES (1641)
CLAIM : EXPERIENCES EQUIPPED WITH REASONS MANIPULATES INNER/UNDERLYING
KNOWLEDGE TO BECOME APPLICABLE KNOWLEDGE
8. MODERN RATIONALISTS
• CHOMSKY (1967)
• BEVER (1970)
CHOMSKY : MIND HAS SOME FACULTIES OF KNOWLEDGE AND NEED SOME
RELEVANT EXPERIENCES WITH CERTAIN FACULTIES TO MANIPULATE THE
INNER/UNDERLYING KNOWLEDGE TO BECOME APPLICABLE KNOWLEDGE
9. • BEVER : IN MIND THERE IS AN INNER/UNDERLYING KNOWLEDGE STRUCTURES OF
A COMMON COGNITION WHICH ARE APPLICABLE TO ALL KIND OF
KNOWLEDGE
• SO, ALL AGREE THAT IN MIND THERE IS CERTAIN UNDERLYING KNOWLEDGE
10. EMPIRICISM
• IN CONTRAST, EMPIRICISM CLAIMS THAT NO IDEAS WHICH ARE A KNOWLEDGE
INTERNALISED IN MIND.
• THUS, THEY REFUSE THE UNDERLYING CONCEPT
• EG; PUTNAM (1967); IN MAN’S MIND THERE IS A COMMON INTELLEGENCE
CALLED “ A COMMON MULTIFUNCTIONAL LEARNING STRATEGY”
• DIVIDED INTO TWO; PARTICULARISTS AND UNIVERSALISTS
11. PARTICULARISTS & UNIVERSALISTS
• PARTICULARISTS, JAMES MILL (1829); ‘GENERAL IDEAS ARE ABSTRACT, AS
SUCH THEY DO NOT EXIST”, EG. ‘DOG’ REFERS TO PARTICULAR DOG.
• UNIVERSALISTS, JOHN LOCKE (1690); “APART FROM A PARTICULAR IDEA,
THERE IS ALSO A GENERAL ONE”, EG. ‘DOG’ REFERS TO ALL KIND OF DOGS
• HOWEVER, THIS WAS REFUSED BY PARTICULARIST BY ARGUING THAT IF A DOG
HAS NOSE AND EYES, WOULD ALL FORMS OF NOSE AND THE COLOUR OF EYES
INCLUDE ALL FORMS OF NOSE AND THE COLOUR OF EYES IN THE WORLD?