3. Non-Automated Tank Cleaning
• Manual Cleaning
– Worker safety issues
– Time (is money)
– Repeatability
• Fill & Drain
– Large volumes of water/cleaning solution
– Sometimes must be heated
– Slow
– Repeatability
4. • Fully Automated CIP
– Completely automated system
– Multiple cycles
– Spray nozzle or tank cleaning
device
• Portable Systems
– Simple components
• Pump /fluid delivery system
• Spray nozzle or tank cleaning
device
– Mobile
Automated Tank Cleaning
5. “My tanks are too big (or too small)
for an automated solution”
Myth or Fact?
7. Selecting the Right Equipment
Automated Units for Cleaning Tanks with Dia.
Ranging from 2’ to 100’ are Available
High-Impact Tank Cleaners
for Tanks Up to 100’ in Dia.
Medium-Impact Tank
Cleaners for Tanks Up to
60’ in Dia.
Low-Impact Tank Cleaners &
Nozzles for Tanks Up to 25’
in Dia.
Tank Cleaning Nozzles for Rinsing
Tanks with Dia. From 2’ to 16’
8. “My tanks are too big (or too small)
for an automated solution”
Myth or Fact?
14. Preventing “Shadowing”
• Account for Internal Obstructions
– Carefully select position
– Consider multiple units
– Use deflected sprays
• Other manageable restrictions
– Size or location of access ports
– Unusual tank shape
– Extremely tall or long tanks
18. • Decreases the bond between
soil and surface
• Decreases soil viscosity
• Increases soil solubility
• Increases chemical reaction
rate (may allow for shorter
cycle time)
High Temperature
19. • Duration that cleaning solution is
in contact with equipment surface
• Factors that influence duration
– Chemical concentration – correct
type of cleaner for soil removal
– Impact force
• Water pressure
• Flow rate
• Nozzle selection
– Temperature - to maximize reaction
rate of cleaning solution
Cleaning Time
20. • Varies based on chemical selected,
type of soil and surface to be
cleaned
• Concentration normally reduced as
time and temperature increase
• Lower concentration means less
chemical is used and cost is reduced
Chemical Concentration
21. • Increasing spray impact
may allow decreases in
– Temperature
– Chemical concentration
– Time
• Double spray impact force
by:
– Doubling liquid flow rate
– Quadrupling liquid pressure
• Increasing impact instead of temperature can save thousands
by decreasing energy costs
Spray Impact – An Alternative to High
Temperatures
22. “I’ll still need hot water to remove
residue even with an automated
tank cleaner”
Myth or Fact?
23. “The residue in my tank is prone
to sparking so automation is out
of the question”
Myth or Fact?
24. Tank Cleaning in Explosive Environments
• Read the owners manual
• Be sure the unit is grounded
• Use chemicals compatible with the
unit’s materials of construction
• Use explosion-proof motors
25. “The residue in my tank is prone
to sparking so automation is out
of the question”
Myth or Fact?
26. “I won’t be able to verify that
my tanks are completely clean”
Myth or Fact?
27. • Acoustic sensors can be installed on
tank exterior to detect
– Rotation failure
– Changes in rotation frequency
– Changes in spray pressure
– Clogged nozzles
• Audible / visual alarms notify
operators when change detected
• Swab tests also possible
Monitoring Devices Verify Cleaning
28. “I won’t be able to verify that
my tanks are completely clean”
Myth or Fact?
29. “The payback on automated
tank cleaning is too long”
Myth or Fact?
30. $ Water + energy to heat water
$ Chemicals
$ Labor
$ Disposal
$ Lost Production Time
$ Re-cleaning Tanks
$ Scrap Product
= True cost
The true cost of manual or fill
and drain methods
31. The Payback for Automated
Tank Cleaning
• Cleaner tank
• Shorter cycle time
• Lower energy costs
• Reduced chemical usage
• Lower labor costs
• Improved worker safety
32. Payback Example – Chemical Processor
• Situation
– 3200 gallon reactors needed cleaning after every
batch
– CIP system failed to clean effectively at 1000 psi
– Manual cleaning was required after automated
cleaning to ensure cleaning
– This combination was expensive, time consuming
and dangerous
33. • Solution
– High pressure rotary tank cleaning
nozzle used, operating at 1800 psi
– Pneumatic insertion/
retractable device eliminated
any need for personnel to enter
tank
• Result
– Cleaning time reduced from 2 hrs to 10 min
– Additional production time paid for equipment in
just a few months
Payback Example – Chemical Processor
34. “The payback on automated
tank cleaning is too long”
Myth or Fact?
36. I can’t automate because…
• My tanks are too big (or small)
• My tanks won’t get clean
37. I can’t automate because…
• My tanks are too big (or small)
• My tanks won’t get clean
• I’ve got obstructions in my tank
38. I can’t automate because…
• My tanks are too big (or small)
• My tanks won’t get clean
• I’ve got obstructions in my tank
• I’ll still need hot water to remove residue
39. I can’t automate because…
• My tanks are too big (or small)
• My tanks won’t get clean
• I’ve got obstructions in my tank
• I’ll still need hot water to remove residue
• The residue in my tank is prone to sparking
40. I can’t automate because…
• My tanks are too big (or small)
• My tanks won’t get clean
• I’ve got obstructions in my tank
• I’ll still need hot water to remove residue
• The residue in my tank is prone to sparking
• I won’t be able to verify my tanks are clean
41. I can’t automate because…
• My tanks are too big (or small)
• My tanks won’t get clean
• I’ve got obstructions in my tank
• I’ll still need hot water to remove residue
• The residue in my tank is prone to sparking
• I won’t be able to verify my tanks are clean
• The payback is too long
42. I can’t automate because…
• My tanks are too big (or small)
• My tanks won’t get clean
• I’ve got obstructions in my tank
• I’ll still need hot water to remove residue
• The residue in my tank is prone to sparking
• I won’t be able to verify my tanks are clean
• The payback is too long
FINAL SCORE: 6 “myths”, 1 “maybe”