SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 48
Download to read offline
The Twining project, an institutional cooperation between Italy and Turkey, is co-financed
                  by the European Union and the Republic of Turkey.



                                 EU TWINNING PROJECT

        “Improving Data Quality in Public Accounts”




 GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC FINANCE DATA
     DISSEMINATION AND ACCESS

                               Final version



                                     Activity 1.7


                                      May 2012




                                            1
Table of contents
1. Foreword.......................................................................................................................... 3
2. International requirements and good practices ................................................................ 4
  2.1 International initiatives ................................................................................................ 4
  2.2 Fundamental aspects of fiscal transparency and public accounts data dissemination5
      Comprehensiveness ............................................................................................... 5
      Reliability .............................................................................................................. 6
      Comparability (in time and space) and timeliness .................................................... 7
      Understandable to the public .................................................................................. 9
  2.3 What is a Citizens’ Budget .......................................................................................... 9
      Main elements of a Citizens’ Budget ...................................................................... 11
      Citizens’ Budget style and format .......................................................................... 13
      Citizens’ Budget dissemination .............................................................................. 13
  2.4 New challenges for fiscal transparency: open government data ............................... 16
      Some benefits of open data inside and outside the public administration................. 20
      “Open” public finance data ................................................................................... 20
3. Technological solutions.................................................................................................. 28
  3.1 System architecture for data dissemination at GDPA ............................................... 29
  3.2 Geographical Information System (GIS) ................................................................... 32
  3.3 Statistical tools for data management ....................................................................... 33
  3.4 Data Warehouse ....................................................................................................... 34
  3.5 Data Visualization ..................................................................................................... 35
  3.6 Open Data tools ........................................................................................................ 39
  3.7 Interoperability to data .............................................................................................. 40
4. Public understanding and involvement .......................................................................... 44
  4.1 Public consultations .................................................................................................. 44
  4.1 Promoting data use and re-use through websites and competitions ......................... 45




                                                                  2
1. Foreword
The foundation of modern public financial reporting lies in the communication of financial
information about the government’s activities to citizens and their representatives in
Parliament. Indeed, fiscal transparency is a key aspect of the accountability for the way in
which governments raise taxes, borrow, and spend public money and, since the late
nineties, it is increasingly a requirement of international obligations (e.g., within the IMF,
the OECD and the European Union).
Fiscal transparency requires providing information about past, present and future activities
of government in collecting and allocating public resources and in a way that it be:
   •   comprehensive, reliable, timely, comparable in time and space, understandable to
          the public
   •   easily accessible, at detailed level (raw data), re-useable (i.e. open data)
Although there is room for debate on the benefits of wide access to public finance details,
there is a broad consensus on the fact that fiscal transparency is relevant for:
   • Better informed decisions (in government and outside it)
          o it helps to highlight potential risks to the fiscal outlook, resulting in an earlier
            and smoother fiscal policy response to changing economic conditions
          o it enables public debate which may improve resource allocation
          o greater oversight by civil society and international markets encourages
            governments to pursue sound economic policies and achieve greater
            financial stability
   • Increased accountability of policy action
          o it strengthens credibility and public understanding of macroeconomic policies
            and choices
          o it may enhance social consensus on difficult trade-offs in the context of
            limited resources and multiple demands
   • Increased accountability of public officials
          o tracking expenditure and knowing whether it has gone to where was planned
            makes it easier to detect (and reduce) corruption
   • Better access to capital markets
          o Investors are reassured by more transparent governments and therefore a
            more willing to facilitate access to international capital markets
These Guidelines aim at improving the GDPA capacity for data publication and accessibility
according to the following viewpoints: contents; technological solutions (IT architecture
and software platforms) and public understanding and involvement (media, citizens,
NGOs). Particular focus is made on opportunities for public accounts dissemination and
communication through open data. Each topic is presented briefly and accompanied by a
more extensive list of examples, references and websites.

                                              3
2. International requirements and good practices
2.1 International initiatives
Guidelines and assessments on the extent to which countries satisfy them are promoted
by international organizations and civil society organizations.
The major on-going initiatives are:
1) IMF Fiscal Transparency Code (since 1998, revised in 2007)
In 1998, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) introduced a Code of Good Practices on
Fiscal Transparency which led to a voluntary program of fiscal transparency assessments
called fiscal transparency modules of Reports on the Observance of Standards and Codes
(ROSC). The Code provides a comprehensive framework for fiscal transparency and
focuses on clear roles and responsibilities, transparent budget processes, public availability
of information, and assurances of integrity. To expand and explain the principles of the
Code, and to help guide the conduct of fiscal ROSCs, a Manual on Fiscal Transparency was
released and revised in 2007.
http://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/trans/code.htm
http://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/trans/manual/intro.htm


2) OECD Best Practices for Budget Transparency (since 2001)
The OECD best practices for budget transparency are a reference tool supporting the full
disclosure of all relevant fiscal information in a timely and systematic manner and provide
a series of best practices in the areas of principal budget reports, specific disclosures,
quality, and integrity.
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/13/1905258.pdf


3) Open Budget Initiative (since 2005)
The International Budget Partnership conducts, in collaboration with civil society around
the world, a biennial Open Budget Survey and Index, providing ratings of the openness of
budget material in over 60 countries. The detailed and systematic survey of current
practice is performed by local experts (in Turkey TESEV). The Index assesses the
availability of key budget documents, the quantity of information they provide, and the
timeliness of their dissemination to citizens in order to provide reliable information on each
country’s commitment to budget transparency and accountability.
http://www.openbudgetindex.org


4) Open Government Partnership (OGP) on Budget Transparency (since 2011)
The Open Government Partnership is a multilateral initiative advance in 2011. It aim to
secure commitments from governments to promote transparency, empower citizens, fight
corruption, and harness new technologies to strengthen governance. OGP is overseen by a

                                              4
steering committee of eight governments and nine civil society organizations. It has a
specific module on budget transparency and reporting standards. One of the core
principles states “Transparency: information on government activities and decisions is
open, comprehensive, timely, freely available to the public and meets basic open data
standards (e.g. raw data, machine readability)”
http://www.opengovpartnership.org/



  Box 1: Key budget reports for the public


  Internationally accepted good practices require governments to publish at least eight key
  budget reports at various points in the budget year:
     •   Pre-Budget Statement
     •   Executive’s Budget Proposal
     •   Enacted Budget
     •   Citizens Budget
     •   In-Year Monthly Reports
     •   Mid-Year Review
     •   Year-End Report
     •   Audit Report.




2.2 Fundamental aspects of fiscal transparency and public accounts data
dissemination
The dissemination of data on public accounts should follow basic principles, such as
comprehensiveness, reliability, timeliness, comparability in time and space, and being
understandable to the public. Hereafter a selection of the main features connected to each
principle.
Comprehensiveness
The budget documentation, including the final accounts, and other published
fiscal reports should cover all budgetary and extra-budgetary activities:
   • Extra-budgetary activities are transactions of general government entities that are
     not included in the budget appropriation laws. Examples:
          o transactions related to commercial activities of government agencies (user
            fees) that are not included in their budgeted revenue and expenditure;
          o social security funds,
          o nonmarket nonprofit institutions, financed by government transfers or
            earmarked revenues
          o revolving funds
          o tax expenditures

                                             5
o contingent liabilities
          o quasi-fiscal activities
   • The central government should publish information on the level and composition
     of its debt and financial assets, significant non-debt liabilities (including pension
     rights, guarantee exposure, and other contractual obligations), and natural resource
     assets.
   • The budget documentation should report the fiscal position of sub-national
     governments and the finances of public corporations.
   • The overall balance and gross debt of the general government should be standard
     summary indicators of the government fiscal position. They should be
     supplemented, where appropriate, by other fiscal indicators, such as the primary
     balance, the public sector balance, and net debt.


Reliability
Fiscal data should meet accepted data quality standards, related to definitions and
classifications:
   • accounting policies meet generally accepted accounting standards;
   • international standard classifications to be used for economic and functional
     descriptions (e.g. COFOG / SEC), on the side of national classifications
and related to checking the data:
   • automated procedures are used to facilitate the monitoring of the accuracy of
     data reported by individual government sector units for internal consistency testing
     of each institution’s data (e.g., cross-checks). Data inconsistencies and out-of-trend
     values are confirmed with reporting units, and documented.
   • source data are assessed by checking across different sources (e.g., payables
     by one part of the general government are equal to receivables by another,
     checking independent creditor and debtor sources, and domestic bank financing
     records compared with banking records, etc.).
   • sound techniques are in place to estimate missing data, when relevant (to deal
     with coverage problems).
   • final accounts are fully reconciled with budget appropriations
An in-depth treatment of this issue is found in the IMF’s July 2003 Data Quality
Assessment         Framework       and       Data   Quality     Program,      at
http://dsbb.imf.org/Pages/DQRS/Home.aspx                                   and
http://dsbb.imf.org/images/pdfs/dqrs_gfs.pdf




                                            6
Comparability (in time and space) and timeliness


   o fiscal aggregate outcomes are compared with previous forecasts                    and with
     outturns of previous years
   o international classifications, alongside national ones, are used for economic
     and functional representations (such as ESA95 and COFOG)
   o dissemination of advance-release calendars
   o simultaneous release to all interested parties


 Box 2: OECD Best Practices on monthly reports
 o      Monthly updates on expenditures and revenues should show progress in implementing
 the budget:
    •   They should be released within four weeks of the end of each month.
    •   They should contain the amount of revenue and expenditure in each month and year-
        to-date.
    •   A comparison should be made with the forecast amounts of monthly revenue and
        expenditure for the same period. Any in-year adjustments to the original forecast should
        be shown separately.
    •   A brief commentary should accompany the numerical data. If a significant divergence
        between actual and forecast amounts occurs, an explanation should be made.
    •   Expenditures should be classified by major administrative units (e.g., ministry,
        agency). Supplementary information classifying expenditure by economic and
        functional categories should also be presented.
    •   Information on commitments should be provided in addition to information on
        payments
    •   The reports should also contain information on the government’s borrowing activity


 Source: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/13/1905258.pdf




                                               7
Box 3: The Open Budget Index (OBI) for Turkey
The Open Budget Index is an initiative of the International Budget Partnership. It assigns
countries a transparency score on a 100-point scale using 92 questions from a detailed Survey
focusing on whether the government provides the public with timely access to comprehensive
information contained in eight key budget documents. The last Survey was conducted in 2010:


According to the Open Budget Surveys conducted since 2006, Turkey’s ranking has consistently
improved from 42 points over 100 in 2006 to 57 in 2010. The overall situation is comparable to
several neighboring countries (including Italy), but it is lower than EU average.


Figure 1: OBI Scores 2010 Turkey, Italy and other major EU countries




•   .

Source: Open Budget Index 2010.
The main OBI recommendations in 2010 for Turkey concerned the following data dissemination
areas:
    •   improving the comprehensiveness of the Executive’s Budget Proposal, Year-End Report
        and Audit Report (in particular by including information on extra-budgetary funds,
        quasi-fiscal activities, tax expenditures, contingent and future liabilities, and financial
        and other assets; and by helping to explain the relationship between the government’s
        revenue and expenditure plans and its policy and macroeconomic goals; and by adding
        information on outputs and outcomes)
    •   publishing a Mid-Year Review and increasing data in Monthly In-Year reports (which
        lack information on the specific characteristics of external debt, such as maturity,
        interest rate and currency denomination)
    •   producing a Citizens Budget;
    •   providing opportunities for the public to testify at legislative hearings on the budget;
    •   increasing the powers of the legislature to provide more comprehensive oversight not
        only when the budget is being approved but also during the budget execution period



For more information see: http://internationalbudget.org/wp-
content/uploads/2011/04/Turkey-OBI2010QuestionnaireFinal.pdf




                                               8
Understandable to the public
The understanding of the budget process by individual citizens and non-governmental
organizations should actively be promoted. In particular, the public should be provided
with comprehensive information on past, current, and projected fiscal activity and on
major fiscal risks. Fiscal information should be presented in a way that facilitates policy
analysis and promotes accountability. Regularly reports, should be published in a simple
language. There should be a commitment to make timely publication of fiscal information
written in a simple language which can be easily understood by the public at large. The
publication should also contain a description of the budget process, including the roles of
the executive branch, in preparing the budget and of the legislature in authorising
government taxation, borrowing, and expenditure.
This objective can be achieved presenting fiscal information in a way that facilitates
policy analysis: While selecting the information to public the following two concepts should
be kept in mind
      Fiscal data should be reported on a gross basis, distinguishing revenue,
      expenditure, and financing
      Expenditure should be classified by economic, functional, and administrative
      category.
In addition:
      o A clear and simple summary guide to the budget should be widely distributed
        at the time of the annual budget.
      o Budget presentations and accounts should contain clear statements of the
        government’s objectives (e.g. missions and programs) as well as a listing
        of the items on which money is spent (as in traditional line-item
        budgeting).
      o Results of previous policies should also be evaluated against their
        stated objectives, by measuring also measure outputs and outcomes in
        relation to these objectives.
The government’s work is highly technical and to make public finance data understandable
it is often not sufficient to simply disclose specialized documents e statistics. Promoting a
Citizens’ Budget in a language that ordinary people can understand and appreciate is a
way to facilitate communication to the public.


2.3 What is a Citizens’ Budget
Financial data provided by governments are not always easily understood by the general
public for various reasons: because they may be presented in a highly technical way,
according to aggregates and categories relevant to the administrations operations but not
the citizens main interests. This may impede citizens capability to understand where their

                                             9
financial contribution goes. A Citizens’ budget is a tool for empowering citizens to be
aware of the budget process and to follow how budgetary resources are used. It is thus a
tool to understand the whole budget process and its implementation and to contribute to
accountability and transparency of service providers for public administrations.
The International Budget Partnership (IBP) definition for Citizens’ Budget is “A citizen
budget is a non-technical presentation of the government budget which is intended to
enable the public-including those who are not familiar with public finance-understand
government plans”.
Generally speaking, a Citizens’ budget is a collective term for various ways to involve
citizens in the budget process and allocation of financial resources. The concept was
started in the late 1980s in the city of Porto Alegre (Brazil) and since then, it has spread to
all continents and is currently active at country, regional and local level in many places
around the world. Today, thanks to ICT technology, a Citizens’ budget can become an
interactive tool for governments and public institutions to receive feedback from citizens
on matters of public interest.
Usually, a Citizens’ Budget is mainly aimed at the communication to the public Executive’s
Budget Proposal. In this case it should be produced at the same time the budget is
presented to the legislature. In some cases, the Citizens’ Budget is in fact based on the
Enacted Budget or Budget Law and illustrates presenting the estimate of income received
by the State, as well as the expenditures estimates that are authorized to the institutions
so they can execute programs and projects; which in turn translates into public services
financed by taxes that have been collected. However, a clear understanding of what has
actually happened during the Budget Execution through the representation of the
outturns/end-of-year financial statement and how much or why it has differed from the
initial plans is equally as important.
Broadly speaking, a Citizen’s budget should be aim at:
   • guaranteeing the right of citizens to have access to detailed information on
     government's activities as they are the main contributors
   • improving communication through the implementation of actions which are
     more visible and closer to citizens in order to increase general consent on future
     government policies;
   • raising a clear perception of the services offered and though which
     expenditure
   • managing realistic expectations among citizens in how public money are used.
   • preventing media communications crisis due to misunderstanding in the data
     interpretation
   • enhancing accountability.


Citizens’ budget, in order to be successful, needs of course to be integrated into a larger
governance agenda, and should involve the cooperation with civil society, good
governance and rule of law which have been proved to be increasingly critical elements in
guaranteeing transparency.

                                              10
In most cases the Citizens’ Budget is the result of a joint work among:
   • the Directorate in charge of the overall Budget preparation and monitoring (such as
     the General Directorate of Public Accounts)
   • the IT Department, in charge of implementing the IT system for data inclusion and
     storage
   • the Press Office/Communication office, for the preparation of the tools and events
     in order to make the public at large aware of the budget.
Main elements of a Citizens’ Budget
Citizens’ Budget should thus include the following main principles:
Clarity of roles and responsibilities: a clear explanation of the structure and functions
of the government, of the responsibilities within government, and of the relations between
government and the rest of the economy should be provided in order to better understand
the mechanisms which lay behind the budget structure;
Open budget processes: some information about how a budget is prepared, executed,
and monitored is also essential;
Public availability of information: specification of the coverage, detail, and timing of
fiscal information should also be provided to the public;
Assurance of integrity: a description of how the quality of fiscal data is guaranteed.

Although there is no agreement on the definition, purposes and contents of a Citizens’
Budget, these are some of the common features in most countries:
          Highlighting the budget priorities
          Presenting a broad introduction to the key components of the budget
          Examples on how the budget will impact ordinary citizens and significant new
          measures
          Fiscal balance over medium term horizon
          Promoting transparency and access to budget information also by other means
          (mentioned in the Citizens’ Budget)
The Citizens’ Budget should present what is the estimated / actual revenue and what is
estimated / actual expenditure:
          by function (or sector);
          by purpose (or objective o program)
          by administrative unit;
          by economic category (e.g. wages and salaries, interest, capital expenditures)
          by geographical location
          by financing source

and where applicable:
          by major programme
          by funding line



                                             11
The following is an example check-list of information which are of interest for the citizens



                  Check-List of information to be provided to citizens
  Determining the information the citizen want is a main step to prepare a good citizens’
  budget
  As regards income the following questions should be addressed:
         How much of the government’s activities does the budget cover?
         Which is the profile of the different tax-payers? (how many different types of
         taxes? which kind of taxes?)
         Are there any external financial sources (international donors; EU)?
         How much is being borrowed and from whom?
  As regards expenditure the following questions should be addressed:
         For what and with which aims are expenditures made? (functional classification)
         What is being “bought” with public expenditure: salaries, goods and services,
         investments? (economic classification)
         who is responsible within Public Administration                of   the    expenditure
         management? (administrative classification)
         Who are the beneficiaries? Families, companies, other public administrations?
         Which is the difference between planning and final expenditure?
         How much time is needed to implement a public investment project?
          How much does it cost the expenses management? (salaries, purchase of goods or services
         to make the system work)
         Which are the tools which allow the public expenditure?
         Which kind of projects were funded in a specific area? (district, municipality,
         region)
         Which are the main sectors and for which reason




Additional information to be provided could also regard:
      the different types of accounts or funds, and what agencies are inside or outside
      the budget;
      data on the government’s extra-budgetary activities, and their impact on
      consolidated government accounts
      a summary and an explanation of the “quasi-fiscal activities”
      transfers between different levels of government

                                               12
Remember also:
      to include references and links to more detailed spending information
      to demonstrate realism of the budgeted levels of revenues, expenditures and the
      fiscal balance by comparing with recent trends
      to evaluate expected out-turn for the current year in comparison to its forecast in
      the previous budget
      to list key fiscal risks:



Citizens’ Budget style and format
The Citizens’ Budget is deliberately produced for citizens and explains how the
government collects, distributes and uses public resources. The best format should be a
stand-alone technical document, ideally produced by Ministry of Finance, written in simple
language with limited use of jargon and of abbreviations.
The document should also:
      highlight simple and attractive charts and diagrams
      be short but provided with lots of links
      contain maps on expenditure allocation to sub-national / local governments
      use simple per-capita indicators for significant revenue and expenditure
      aggregates, in addition to the total figures , and present main figures as
      percentage of GDP
      include a budget / public accounts terminology glossary


  Box 4: Suggestions for adopting a clear language

  Particular attention must also be devoted to the language used when explaining the budget to
  the citizens.
  In this context the following useful material can be the consulted.
  1.      “how    to    write    clearly”    published    by   the     European     Commission:
  http://ec.europa.eu/translation/writing/clear_writing/how_to_write_clearly_en.pdf
  2.     “Style        guide”          published              by        the         Economist:
  http://www.economist.com/styleguide/introduction




Citizens’ Budget dissemination

The Citizens’ Budget should be actively disseminated. It is suggested to arrange launches
in occasion of public seminars, conferences and in occasion of Public Administration Fairs
both at national and at international level. it should also be encouraged the NGOs

                                                13
participation, to publicize its availability on the web. Copies should be made available in
hard copy and electronic form, but also alternative formats can be considered such as:

           Video clips
           Radio podcasts
           Poster
           Pamphlets


Additional educational materials could be prepared to be disseminated in schools, so that
teachers, together with their students use it as an educational subject. Awards could be
published in schools were teachers and student will be asked to explain the budget to the
general Public. The best budget representation could be used as a standard format for the
publication of the Citizens’ Budget. In case of multi-ethnic communities the use of multiple
languages should be considered, together with its availability in formats and tools which
take into consideration the disadvantaged groups. Finally, the Citizens’ Budget, once
published, should be actively promoted through an adequate media campaign.




 Box 5: Typical tools for a media campaigning

  Press release: a news release, press release or press statement is a written or recorded
  communication directed at members of the news media for the purpose of announcing
  something claimed as having news value. The publication of the citizens’ budget is a good
  opportunity to send a press release in order to attract media attention on the issue. Typically,
  it is mailed, faxed, or e-mailed to assignment editors at newspapers, magazines, radio stations,
  television stations, and/or television networks. The press release should follow an inverted
  pyramid style, with information appearing in its order of importance so that editors can easily
  identify key facts
  Press conferences: they allow the officials to present the budget and to explain its logic.
  They are organised to inform the public at large. The press conference is a media event in
  which newsmakers invite journalists to hear them speak and, most often, ask questions. There
  are two major reasons for holding a news conference. One is that a newsmaker, who gets
  many questions from reporters, can answer them all at once rather than answering dozens of
  phone calls. Another is so someone can try to attract news coverage for something that was
  not of interest to journalists before.
  Media training sessions: they can be used to train journalists about the most technical
  terminology related to the budget presentation. It frequently happens that news on media are
  wrong because the exact terminology and the details of public expenditure are not understood.
  Journalists awards: they can be established to build capacity among journalists working on
  economic issues. The annual awards honour the work and contributions of journalists actively
  engaged in the responsible dissemination of knowledge related to budget issues, and other
  areas that support long-term policies in this sector. Journalists’ awards can be complemented
  by a short training course to provide finalists with an opportunity to discuss and debate citizens’
  budget issues and their impacts on the wider public. Journalists can be awarded or for the
  biggest amount of articles written on the magazines/newspapers, or for the best quality articles
  published on the media.
                                                 14
Examples of Citizens’ Budgets at national and local level


     Canada’s Citizen Budget: an interactive customizable budget simulator
     http://citizenbudget.com/


     New Zealand Key facts for taxpayers (e.g., 2011)
     http://www.treasury.govt.nz/budget/2011/taxpayers/b11-taxpayers.pdf


     Italy’s “Bilancio in Rete” (Budget on the Internet)
     http://www.rgs.mef.gov.it/VERSIONE-I/Bilancio-d/Bilancio-i/


     France’s Budget and Cyber Budget simulator
     http://www.performance-publique.budget.gouv.fr/le-budget-et-les-comptes-de-letat/le-budget-de-
     letat.html
     http://www.cyber-budget.fr/


     Nigerian Budget made simple
     http://yourbudgit.com/ , http://budgetoffice.gov.ng/


     Guatemala’s Citizen Budget
     www.minfin.gob.gt


     The city of Cologne’s participatory budget experience
     http://www.epractice.eu/en/cases/colognepb


     Local Budgeting in Oregon
     http://www.oregon.gov/DOR/PTD/docs/local-b/504-400.pdf?ga=t




                                                 15
2.4 New challenges for fiscal transparency: open government data
The Internet is one of the most striking features affecting today’s societal organization.
Among many other aspects, it allows a quicker and cheaper way to distribute information
and data. Today, most people would agree that the new standard of public transparency is
measured by the amount, significance and re-usability of data released on the web.
Data on revenues and expenditures should be easily accessible, digital, re-
useable from a technical and legal point of view, machine readable, ……. ===
open data
The idea is that with “open data” the public can sort, search, and transform the
information to meet their needs and answer detailed questions, such as:
   • how much of my tax money is spent on cancer research?
   • how much public money is spent for schools in my region?
   • how much revenue is raised by taxing fuel?
Open Government Data is raw information collected or produced by public administrations
that is shared with the public digitally, over the Internet, in a way that promotes analysis
and reuse. The notion of open government data has been around for some years. Since
2009, governments are making important pronouncements on the principles for
transparency in government and on the value of making public data widely accessible for
practical applications in and out of civic life and are launching “open data portals”. A data
portal as a single point of access to documents available for re-use – that is downloading,
searching, analyzing and re-elaborating - such as http://data.gov.uk/ in the United
Kindgom, http://data.gouv.fr in France, http://data.gov.it in Italy, http://data.soumi.fi in
Finland and many others. While e-Government explores how governments can best
exploit ICT to embed good governance principles and achieve public policy goals, open
data concentrates on the availability and accessibility of data, and on idea that third
parties may provide services with such data as well.




                                             16
Box 6: The definition of “openness”
Supposedly, open data should be released in a machine-processable format and with no patent
licensing restrictions, so that the public can sort, search, and transform the information to meet
their needs. Different definitions emphasize different features of “openness”. A comprehensive
overview is provided by http://opendefinition.org/okd/ which lists the following features:
1. Access
Available as a whole and at a reasonable reproduction cost, preferably downloading via the
Internet without charge. The work must be available in a convenient and modifiable form.
2. Redistribution
The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the work either on its own or
as part of a package made from derived work. License without royalty or other fee.
3. Reuse
The license must allow for modifications and must allow them to be distributed under the terms
of the original work.
4. Absence of Technological Restriction
The work must be provided in such a form that there are no technological obstacles to the
performance of the above activities (eg. open data format)
5. Attribution
The license may require the attribution of the contributors and creators to the work.
6. Integrity
The license may require as a condition for the work being distributed in modified form that the
resulting work carry a different name or version number from the original work.
7. No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups
The license must not discriminate against any person or group of persons.
8. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor
The license must not restrict anyone from use the work in a specific field of endeavor. For
example, it may not restrict the work from being used in a business, or for genetic research
9. Distribution of License
The rights attached to the work must apply to all to whom the program is redistributed without
the need for execution of an additional license by those parties.
10. License Must Not Be Specific to a Package
The rights attached to the work must not depend on the work being part of a particular
package. If the work is extracted from that package, all parties redistributed should have the
same rights as the original package.
11. License Must Not Restrict the Distribution of other Works
The license must not place restrictions on other works that are distributed along with the
licensed work. For example, the license must not insist that all other works distributed on the
same medium are open.
Open data does not mean data identifying or that provides ways to identify
individuals, unless that information is already published.
                                               17
Public expenditure data are a prime element of open data initiatives and the open data
concept can, in turn, offer a very interesting platform to disseminate information of public
revenues and expenditures, and on all other aspects of public finance. The main aspect is
the possibility to provide a detailed account by publishing raw data in addition to
aggregates.
In fact many recent EU initiatives, such as the “European Transparency Initiative (ETI)”
launched by the European Commission in 2005, aim at raising awareness of the use
made of EU money to explain better what Europe does and why it matters.A
consultation, opened on 3 May and closed on 31 August 2006, was promoted by the
European Commission was based on a series of questions related to EU funds beneficiaries
(http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/kallas/transparency_en.htm). The main result of
this process was the adoption of the revised Financial Regulation (December 13, 2006) in
which the EU committed itself to full transparency about who receives monies from
the EU budget.



 Examples of the publication of data on Beneficiaries of EU Funds


 The disclosure of data about the recipients of various EU funds managed by the European Commission in
 partnership with Member States, notably the Structural Funds and Common Agricultural Policy, for which
 specific transparency requirements hold.


  The web pages provide a catalogue of where to find the information for all Member countries. The
 information is very detailed, but is not necessarily published as open data.


        Web page on Beneficiaries of Grants
        http://ec.europa.eu/grants/beneficiaries_en.htm


        Web page on Beneficiaries of Public Contracts
        http://ec.europa.eu/public_contracts/beneficiaries_en.htm


        Web page on Beneficiaries of Common Agricultural Policy payments
        http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/funding/index2_en.htm



From a normative point of view, much of the debate on open data today in the EU
revolves around the ongoing revision process of Directive 2003/98 for the re-use Public
Sector Information http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/index_en.htm (see
Box 7).


                                                   18
Box 7: EU Directive 2003/98 for the re-use Public Sector Information
The main objective of the Directive is to establish “a minimum set of rules governing the re-
use and the practical means of facilitating re-use of existing documents held by public sector
bodies of the Member States”:
   •   -re-use of documents for commercial or non-commercial purposes where the re-use of
       documents held by public sector bodies is allowed
   •   -requirements for documents to be made available through electronic means
   •   -transparency on conditions and charge is granted (and must be non-discriminatory for
       similar categories of re-use)
   •   -prohibition of exclusive arrangements to grant exclusive rights on documents.
The directive covers written texts but also e.g. databases, maps, audio files and films.
A revision of the Directive is in course and expected by end of 2012. Issues under
discussion:
          •    General rule that all documents held by public sector bodies will be re-
               usable for both commercial and non-commercial purposes, unless
               covered by the exceptions provided for in the Directive
          •    including new bodies in the scope of application of the Directive such as libraries
               (including university libraries), museums and archives;
          •    limiting the fees that can be charged by the public authorities at the marginal
               costs as a rule;
          •    introducing independent oversight over re-use rules in the Member States;
          •    making machine-readable formats for information held by public authorities
               the norm.

As part of the Digital Agenda for Europe1, in addition to adapting the legal framework for data
re-usethe EC Commission is also:

   •   Mobilizing financial resources in favor of open data and support the development of
       European data portals
   •   Facilitate coordination and experience sharing between European countries, in particular
       through:

           •   the PSI group, a Member States’ expert group exchanging good practices
           •   the PSI platform a web portal which provides news on good practices, new
               products and services, and legal cases concerning PSI re-use,
           •   the LAPSI network, the European network for policy discussions and strategic
               action on legal issues related to the access and the re-use of PSI
           •   the ISA (Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrations) for
               semantic interoperability to address the need of efficient public services in
               EU by facilitating electronic collaboration between public administrations.


                                                19
Some benefits of open data inside and outside the public administration
Broadly speaking, there are numerous benefits of open data the public administration as
well as for users. Experience up to now suggests the following:
Accountability: the expectation is that modern, democratic government shares
information with the society it governs to demonstrate freedom from corruption and
appropriate use of public funds.
Efficiency improvements within the administration: public reporting of costs and
comparative outcomes can be a driver of efficiency. Internal collection and monitoring of
management information is critical for driving efficiency improvements, and for making
informed strategic decisions.
Service performance: at present, where data is not open outside government, it may
often not be available inside government as well. Public sector bodies are not easily able
to benchmark their costs and the quality of their services against their peers and may
have falsely high – or low – understanding of their performance. In some cases, peer-
based competition is sharpened by public scrutiny.
Data Quality: knowing that the data are released to the public improves their quality,
and because the data owners pay more attention to the processes of data management
and end users can find any errors.
Data exchange: Open Data released by Public Bodies can be directly used by other
Public Administrations, replacing costly dedicated processes; Linked Open Data can be
used to share content definition, following the Semantic Web metaphor.
Innovation in public services: Open Data presents opportunities for public service
transformation by giving users more power to self-serve.
New markets: A new market for public service information can develop if data is freely
available in a standardized format for use and re-use, particularly in the life sciences;
population data mining and risk profiling; consumer technologies; and media sectors.


“Open” public finance data
Il must be kept in mind that the release of “raw” data is very significant in itself and it
provides an opportunity for many interested parties to understand public finances and
answer specific and significant questions on revenue and expenditures. However, it does
not by itself make the government's finances necessarily more “scrutable” and
understandable.
Indeed, raw accounting data usually contains “messy” information, many alphanumerical
and often requires detailed knowledge of variable definitions and encoding schemes.
Moreover, data files are often too large to load into widely available analysis tools (such as
Microsoft Excel, which is a common tool-of-choice for many “simple” data investigators).
This means that “open data” on public finance cannot substitute aggregate views and
(more or less flexible) summary tables presenting the main features.




                                             20
The following are examples of some already existing good practices on the disclosure of
detailed data on public accounts or specific areas of public spending at Government level.



   Examples of Government initiatives:


          US Recovery Act allows tracking single recipients and projects of the Recovery Funds.
           http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/default.aspx


          UK COINS - the Combined On-line Information System used by the UK Treasury to collect
          financial data from across the public sector to support fiscal management, the production of
          Parliamentary supply estimates and public expenditure statistics. Up to eleven years of data
          can be actively maintained in the system - five historic (or outturn) years, the current year and
          up to five future (or plan) years.
          http://hm-treasury.gov.uk/psr_coins_faqs.htm,
          http://hm-treasury.gov.uk/psr_coins_data.htm,
          http://issuu.com/hmtreasury/docs/coins_coding_presentation_july_10


          UK Public spending & reporting transparency monthly-updated list of all financial transactions
          spending over £25,000 from single Departments
          http://hm-treasury.gov.uk/psr_transparency_index.htm


          Italy’s end-of-year financial statement at budget item level (year by year)
          Example: http://dwrgsweb-lb.rgs.mef.gov.it/DWRGSXL/cons.do
          (Budget Law and Mid-Year variations available in the same format at budget item level from
          http://www.rgs.mef.gov.it/VERSIONE-I/Bilancio-d/Bilancio-i/ )




                                                     21
EXAMPLE:      THE US RECOVERY.GOV

To achieve its transparency goal, the “American Recovery and Reinvestment Act” of 2009 requires recipients of “recovery” funds to report every
January, April, July, and October on how they are using the money.

All the data is made available on the Recovery.gov website so the public can track the Recovery funds. The Recovery Act provides $787 billion,
increased to $840 billion in 2012, for tax cuts and benefits for millions of working families and businesses; entitlement programs (such as
unemployment benefits); federal contracts, grants and loans. The vast majority of the recipients fall into one of four categories: State/local
governments, Universities and other research institutions, Non-profit organizations, Private companies.

The website provides several examples on how to make the information easily accessible and interesting for the public. In particular, the
recipient of funds can be tracked on a Map and information can be searched in many ways:

   •   projects can be found at specific locations (through the names of a State, congressional district, or postal code) or by topic (e.g.,
           "university," "energy," "transportation").
   •   recipients name or by topic
   •   projects can be found by status: not yet started, in progress, or completed

Screenshots from the website are shown in the following pages.




                                                                                            See: http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/default.aspx




                                                                     22
23
24
25
The following are examples of some already existing good practices of gathering and re-
using data on public expenditure at civil society level.




  Examples of Civil society initiatives:


          UK Where does my money go
         http://wheredoesmymoneygo.org/
          UK       Guardian     Department         expenditure     over     25     thousand       pounds
          http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/interactive/2010/nov/19/government-data-interactive-guide
          EU Farm Subsidies. Its aim is to obtain detailed data on who gets what from the Common
          Agricultural Policy (CAP
          http://farmsubsidy.org/
          EU Fish Subsidies Subsidies paid to owners of fishing vessels and others working in the fishing
          industry under the European Union’s Common Fisheries Policy
          http://www.fishsubsidy.org/
          UK Local Council Spending
          http://openlylocal.com/councils/spending
          Italy Chamber of Deputies expenditures
          LinkedOpenCamera




                                                     26
EXAMPLE: FISHSUBSIDY.ORG BY EU TRANSPARENCY




                                              See: http://www.fishsubsidy.org/




                               27
3. Technological solutions

The efforts to produce a more friendly approach to data dissemination and to increase
citizens participation is helped by technical solutions that are described in this chapter.
Initially, in the box below a short description of current IT system situation in GDPA, and
consequently it introduces a data dissemination system proposal with several paragraph
on technical tools today available on the market.



  Box 8: The current system in the Turkish Ministry of Finance
  Technologies in GDPA Department can be considered a point of strength in Ministry of
  Finance’s organization. Say 2000i is the result of GDPA’s competence in the domain of
  accounting ready to develop software applications at service of various functionalities of GDPA
  offices.
  Say 2000i is the name of a centralized system based on Oracle technology platform and web
  base applications that connects 4839 accounting units at the Local government level required
  according to Law n. 5018 to provide data on their revenue and expenses. The users distributed
  on Turkish territory are able to connect to the system, using a dedicated portal on off site for
  uploading the financial figures monthly. That users own a password to get access to KBS, a
  dedicated system inclusive in Say 2000i, dedicated to the accounting and financial review
  operations. Some of LGs process data on own local accounting system are monthly.
  In this context, data dissemination procedures have the main data sources in
  Say2000i data stores, which represents the main data provider. Data collection from
  territory (Local Government’s accounting notes) and applications management are centralized
  in a data centre where the software applications running on Say 2000i base platform are
  managed by 12 application servers with Linux operative system and separate storage area for
  internal and external reporting purposes, based on Oracle.


     Table 1: Data collection for Central and Local Government

                                       CG                                  LG


      System used                   Say 2000i                          KBS Portal1

                       Accounting Data are inserted Accounting Data, inserted in a xls
                       directly in Say2000i System which file, are uploaded after automatic
       Data input
                       performs       automatically   all control processes
                       activated controls




                                                28
3.1 System architecture for data dissemination at GDPA


Currently, internal end users can ask for specific queries to be developed, but at present
they cannot directly retrieve data. There are no tools to make direct queries, except for
the Oracle tools used by IT staff. Therefore the creation of a proper datawarehouse,
separated from the operational database, with query functions available to
both internal and external end users would be the best ITC solution.
The data dissemination proceedings need to improve the current IT System through its
own greater specialization by implementing a distinct date base upload by Say2000i data
store where is possible to adopt statistical procedures as data cleaning, filtering, missing
value, and transformation in time series format. The adoption of a system ad-hoc realize a
easier optimization of methodological process for statistical data publication tools.




    Fig. 1. Data upload from centralized storage


    The technological solutions proposed would be through the following:


                 make independent OLTP System and OLAP System, with obvious
                 advantages as speed up computing time, segregation of hardware and
                 software resources, distinction of transaction and computing, etc.;
                 have dedicated hardware and software resources for Statistical Control
                 task;


                                            29
Among the major findings found out with the staff members of IT department, is the rapid
development towards an OLAP, online analytical processing structure and the upgrade of
hardware technologies to Oracle database machine.
The proposal guidelines for creating a Dissemination System are based on dedicated
platform with a operational data base alimented by the accounting system storage, a
staging area where data are computed and refined by statistical tools transforming
financial figures (data registration status) to Statistical data ready for publishing
(validation status). Currently, external end users may only access the financial statistical
reports while the following proposal includes a proper data warehouse, separated from the
operational database, with query functions available to both internal and external end
users.
The objective is to provide a external utilization of statistical data to citizens by creating a
dedicated web site where it is possible to log on with direct access to the data warehouse
performing queries and data extraction.




    Fig. 2. – Data dissemination System



A dedicated IT platform with an operational database for computing statistical controls,
and eventually to run software applications or statistical tools, will be achieved through
the following major design steps:

    1. Creation of ad-hoc operational DB, designed in line with the functional requirements
        indicated by accounting system specifications and function points;
    2. Migration of financial data available from accounting system;



                                              30
3. Determination of computing staging area (from accounting data registration to
        statistical validation)
    4. Integration of financial data, with other information assuring an interoperability of
        data sources;
    5. Migration from Operation DB to data warehousing for Web data publication;
    6. Determination of row data level of data accessibility for users profile;
    7. Logging of users access for control purposes;

The proposal system architecture can be represented in the following information model
where the operational data will be migrated in a dedicated system for data dissemination
where data are normalized, cleansed and integrated on a operational db passing through
several staging areas of “statistical data production”. In the final stage, the statistical data
will me migrated in a DW where data are accessible to external end users (citizen and
professional users) via web portal. On other side, internal end users need to provide the
already scheduled publications and in addition a data aggregation by accounting rules,
dividing data production in classes for scope of data quality control and verification of
consolidated budget.




   Fig. 3 - Logical architecture and information model




                                              31
The data dissemination system as designed in the information model above represents a
IT solution characterized by some points of strength:

   •   drive down the cost of developing new specific queries, on demand, reducing
       budgetary expense;
   •   to raise the level of application services;
   •   to enhance the overall control on data dissemination activities;
   •   speed of data access;
   •   improve accuracy of data;
   •   data integration.


About IT Audit and services maintenance procedures, it is necessary to highlight that ITC
department at GDPA has approached the formalization of procedures in line with Control
Objective Standards (COBIT), a standard de facto in IT audit. Consequently, future
applications running in the area of data dissemination and publications, need to follow the
procedures established by this standard in order to define a new group of functions for the
specific area “Statistical reporting of financial figures”.
The creation of specialized web portal dedicated to data diffusion should include tools for
improving citizens’ understanding of statistical information including data visualization
tools and Geographical Information Systems (GIS).


3.2 Geographical Information System (GIS)
Data representation on geographical maps is considered the best solution for better
explaining to people the activities made from Central and Local Government in the
territory.

Geographic information system is a system designed to capture, store, manipulate,
analyze, manage, and present all types of geographical data. The acronym GIS is
sometimes used for geographical information science and represents the merging of
cartography, statistical analysis, and database technology.

A GIS can be thought of as a system—it digitally creates and "manipulates" spatial areas
that may be jurisdictional, purpose, or application-oriented. A GIS developed for an
application, jurisdiction, or purpose may not be necessarily interoperable or compatible
with other systems and it is based on a spatial data infrastructure (SDI), a concept that
has no such restrictive boundaries.
In a general sense, the term describes any information system that integrates, stores,
edits, analyzes, shares, and displays geographic information for informing the users. It
needs of data repository central to computerized maintenance management system
(CMMS) as a part of dissemination system asset and analytical software systems. GIS
applications are tools that allow users to create interactive queries (user-created
searches), analyze spatial information, edit data in maps, and present the results of all
these operations.


                                            32
Nevertheless the financial figures and budget execution data belonging to GDPA’s data
store need of classification for typology of expenditure (infrastructure, education, healthy,
cohesion, agriculture, etc) and these groups of financial expenditure may be applied with
statistical information from territory as density of population, medium age of population,
university and education centers, medium salary,…., and main territory resources
improving the users understanding to economical life of Turkish Republic.
GIS technologies assure a prompt data visualization of financial data to users in the own
territory providing an interactive tool to compare Public Government activities closer to the
population interest.
This power tool of data visualization fits perfectly for population curiosity while is less
useful for budget execution inherent some class of expenditure not linked to the territory.


3.3 Statistical tools for data management


Many software tools can be used for managing the data from a statistical point of view.
Here we suggest just few examples of tools widely used. These tools could be introduced
to support operation in different steps of the process: from data cleaning, to “big data”
management, to complex statistical elaborations.
Today many of these tools are open source. Here are some examples.
Google Refine (see: http://code.google.com/p/google-refine/) is a power tool for
working with messy data, cleaning it up, transforming it from one format into another,
extending it with web services.
Google Refine is a standalone desktop application for data cleanup and transformation to
other formats. Its interface is similar to spreadsheet applications (and can work with
spreadsheet file formats), however acts more like database.
It operates on rows of data which have cells under columns, which is very similar to
relational database tables. One Refine project is one table. User can filter rows to display
defining filtering criteria (for example, showing rows where given column is not empty).
Unlike spreadsheets, most operations in Refine are done on all visible rows:
transformation of all cells in all rows under one column, creation of new column based on
existing column data, etc. All actions that were done on dataset are stored in project and
can be replayed on another dataset.
Unlike spreadsheets, no formulas are stored in cells, but formulas are used to transform
data, and transformation is done only once.
Program has web user interface, however it is not hosted by software developer, but
available for download and use on local machine. When starting Refine, it starts web
server and starts browser to open web UI powered by this webserver.
Another tool from Google is Google BigQuery https://developers.google.com/bigquery/) , a
web service that lets you do interactive analysis of massive datasets—up to billions of
rows. Scalable and easy to use, BigQuery lets developers and businesses tap into powerful
data analytics on demand.


                                             33
Google BigQuery Service allows you to run SQL-like queries against very large datasets,
with potentially billions of rows. This can be your own data, or data that someone else has
shared for you. BigQuery works best for interactive analysis of very large datasets,
typically using a small number of very large, append-only tables.
While Google Refine is a free product you can download, Google BigQuery is a service
with a pay-per-use policy based on query processing and storage used.
The need for complex statistical operations on data requires the use of a statistical tool.
“R” (http://www.r-project.org/) has been receiving a lot of attention recently, although it’s
been around for over 15 years. R is an open-source language for statistical computing and
data visualization, supporting data manipulation and transformations, as well as
sophisticated graphical displays. Corporate data analysts and statisticians often know R
and use it in their daily work, either writing their own R functionality, or leveraging the
more than 3400 open source packages. The Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN
http://cran.r-project.org/) supports a wide range of statistical and data analysis
capabilities.
R is a statistics language similar to SAS or SPSS. It’s a powerful, extensible environment,
and as noted above, it has a wide range of statistics and data visualization capabilities. It’s
easy to install and use, and it’s free. To expand R features, recently Oracle corporation
released “Oracle R Enterprise” (https://blogs.oracle.com/R/tags/oracle_r_enterprise) that
lifts memory and computational constraint found in R today by executing requested R
calculations on data in the database. Oracle R Enterprise allows users to further leverage
Oracle's engineered systems, like Exadata, already used in Turkish MoF, for enterprise-
wide analytics.


3.4 Data Warehouse
Data Warehouse technology is one of the techniques usually included in “Business
Intelligence” techniques. It provides to users data coming from a cleaned, transformed
Data Base designed for data analysis. Using Data Warehouses (DW) users can select data,
combine them and generate “new” outputs” like tabulations and graphs. DW software is
essential to enable users to analyze data in custom mode, then download the final results
in the desired format.
Many examples of DW are available, some DW tools are developed as an extension of
traditional DBMSs, others are products specifically designed for Business Intelligence. Both
proprietary and open-source products software are available. DW could improve the ability
for Turkish users to analyze data and create new relationships.
Here a short list of Business Intelligence opensource tools: Pentaho
(http://www.pentaho.com/),     Jasper    (http://www.jaspersoft.com/)   and     Palo
(http://www.palo.net/). Some of them are supported by Turkish companies such as GNA
(http://en.gna.com.tr/).
Here our suggestion to introduce Data Warehouse tool:
   – start analyzing Data Warehouse tools market
   – compare tools characteristics with GDPA requirements

                                              34
– test the best two tools, possibly one proprietary and one open-source
   – choose the tool that best meets the requirements of Ministry and external users
   – start releasing a selection of data on a simple DW in which users can process,
     manipulate, download data.


3.5 Data Visualization
More and more statistical organizations are using new methods to present statistical data,
starting from Maps and Advanced Graphic Method (Hans Rosling is considered the father
of New Visualization age - http://www.gapminder.org/) and including charts, Mindmaps,
and display of news, data, connections, websites, articles and resources.
One of the often used tools are “dashboard” a data visualization tool that displays the
current status of metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) for an enterprise.
Dashboards consolidate and arrange numbers, metrics and sometimes performance
scorecards on a single screen. Dashboards can often be obtained using Data Warehouse
tools quoted in previous paragraph.
A simple way to start presenting data using advanced visualization techniques is Google
Public Data Explorer (http://www.google.com/publicdata/home) , a tool by which every
organization can show his data on the Web so that users can find, explore, and share it.
We suggest two steps for using GPDE:
   1. first Ministry of Finance can start testing the tool uploading datasets for
      visualization and exploration by privileged users;
   2. in a second phase MoF can agree with Google for a formal insertion of his data in
      the Dataset Directory http://www.google.com/publicdata/directory.
Many organizations have chosen this way of publishing (often as additional way to their
website), between them WorldBank, IMF, OECD, Eurostat etc.


VIDI is another suite that can be used to display data in new ways. VIDI is a set of Drupal
(an open CMS) modules designed to enable the creation of visual data displays. Using
VIDI tools you can display changes in data values over time, relate data in various ways to
geographical maps, or display static datasets through different types of charts.
Two ways to use it:
   1. use VIDI on the website http://www.dataviz.org loading your data, choosing
      between available visualizations and storing there your visualization;
   2. download VIDI modules and install them in your Drupal website, then import your
      datasets and prepare data displays.


Another website offering advanced methods of visualization for statistical data is IBM
ManyEyes (http://www-958.ibm.com/software/data/cognos/manyeyes/); the service is
offered by IBM and the site is really easy to use:


                                            35
• Upload a data set
    • Choose a visualization type: besides the usual bubble charts, scatter plots, bar
      charts, you find also word-clouds (tag-clouds), treemaps, network diagrams
    • Discover
    • Share with others
Any kind of data set you upload is visible for the community: a nice way to share
discoveries, find cool stuff and start meaningful discussions.
Talking about new visualizations, we must quote the “Infographics”, graphic visual
representations of information, data or knowledge. Good examples of Infographics can be
found at http://www.coolinfographics.com/ and http://www.good.is/infographics .


Other       websites      dedicated      to     visualization    tools      and     methods:
http://datavisualization.ch/tools/, http://visual.ly/. Many visualization techniques are also
available in modules of tools presented above in 3.2 and 3.3 paragraphs.




                                             36
Examples of Advanced Visualizations mentioned in the text
First of all an example of Dashboard, in which many different graphics are collected to give the
user an overview, a glance of the situation.




Then we introduce a page from the World Bank website, one of the best-practice for data
presentation: in this page you can see a sort of Statistical Dashboard




                                              37
examples 9 (continued)
Here a chart obtained from Google Public Data Explorer, a free service in which many national
and international organizations store their data so that users can process them also in graphical
ways




Finally an example from Gapminder, a graph with moving bubble-chart to show the trends over
the past two centuries of economic and health indicators




                                               38
3.6 Open Data tools
Open data are data freely available to everyone to use and republish as they wish, without
restrictions from copyright, patents or other mechanisms of control. Open data are often
available in open formats as “raw data”, meaning that researcher and stakeholders can
make their own processing and analysis on them. More and more Open Data are now
released as Linked Open Data (http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html).
A first software platform available to manage Open Data is CKAN (Comprehensive
Knowledge Archive Network - http://ckan.org/). Developed by OKFN (Open Knowledge
Foundation Network), a community promoting open knowledge and access because these
principles have the potential to deliver far-reaching societal benefits. ‘Open knowledge’
according to OKFN is any content, information or data that people are free to use, re-use
and redistribute — without any legal, technological or social restriction.
It's an open source package that make data accessible – by providing tools to streamline
publishing, sharing, finding and using data. CKAN is aimed at data publishers (national
and regional governments, companies and organizations) wanting to make their data open
and available


Used by many central (dk, no, uk) and local governments, its main features are:
   •   Publish & Find Datasets (import, keywords, versioning)
   •   Store & Manage Data (Raw data, metadata, statistics, geo-)
   •   Engage with users & Others (Community Mgmt)
   •   Customize & Extend (APIs, extensions, opensource)


The World Bank website is an high-level web site that implements many of listed
suggestions and could be used as “best practices” example: http://www.worldbank.org/.
In their website http://data.worldbank.org/ you can find data by country or by topic or by
more than 1.000 indicators . All indicators available in table, map, graph and down-
loadable in xls and xml format. On the World Bank website there are also modules to
directly access WB data from Stata and “R” statistical tools.




                                            39
Box 9: DRUPAL
  The increasing size of data managed by websites and mew ways of data dissemination can be
  well managed only using a Content Management System (CMS). CMSs support the creation,
  management, distribution, publishing, and discovery of corporate information, covering the
  complete life-cycle of the site pages, providing simple tools to create the contents, to publish
  and finally to archive them.
  The main advantages of using CMS is the separation between content management and
  technical management of the site and the availability of numerous tools to improve the
  presentation of the site and simplify the management.
  Many CMS are available for free and open source; between them Drupal(1) gives many
  functions that simplify the data management and visualization (modules Data, Data Cube and
  Linked Data and others1) and therefore it's used in big projects of data dissemination like
  DataGov, DataGov.uk and World Bank (1).
  A list of Turkish government (central and local) websites managed by Drupal can be found at
  http://groups.drupal.org/node/19885#Turkey .
  Drupal with version 7 introduces the use of RDFa. RDFa (or Resource Description Framework –
  in – attributes) is a W3C Recommendation1 that adds a set of extensions to XHTML for
  embedding rich metadata within Web documents, by enriching the existing human-readable
  data with RDF attributes. RDFa then enables us to bridge the gap between what humans see
  when viewing a document and what machines "see" when they process the same document.
  RDFa data can be queried using SPARQL language, another W3C standard. The presence of
  these standard technologies used in Semantic Web is another reason why Drupal is widely used
  for OpenData websites.
  Starting from 2011 there is an effort shared between United States and India: “Data.gov-in-a-
  Box”, an open source version of the United States’ Data.gov data portal (based on Drupal) and
  India’s India.gov.in document portal. The U.S. and India are working together to produce an
  open source version available for implementation by countries globally, encouraging
  governments around the world to stand up open data sites that promote transparency, improve
  citizen engagement, and engage application developers in continuously improving these efforts.
  The new project is called Open Government Platform1 (OGPL). The first module released is the
  Data Management System, which provides the tools and capabilities for publishing data in the
  Open Government Platform, an open source product designed to facilitate governments around
  the world to stand up their own open government data sites.




3.7 Interoperability to data
The formalization of data format is a crucial point to assure data exchange and
interoperability between Institutions and Ministries also in view of e-government projects
which require a more general approach to data analysis and decision making support.
Best practices in Europe are represented by SDMX format, which assures data exchange
among others between European Central Bank and National Central Banks and IMF.

                                               40
The advantage of having standard data formats that share a common Information model
(SDMX) is that all of these types of exchange can take place side-by-side, and the
applications may process metadata assuring interoperability.
The interoperability to data is assured in the following operative steps:
          a. Business alignment in SDMX framework
                  i. From tables to SDMX format ready to be transmitted via gateway
          b. System architecture
                  i. Technology independent specification of an SDMX information model
          c. Data modelling
                  i. Automated mapping of information model


A. Business alignment in SDMX framework. An example of transformation from a table of
monetary and banking statistics to metadata SDMX format (to perform data exchange to
IMF) is the following:




                                             41
B. System architecture.       An example of architecture for data exchange between two
entities is the following:




 C. Data modelling
The content of a generic interchange message for statistical metadata could be
represented in the following items:
   •   Interchange administration segments
   •   Message administration segments
   •   Code lists
   •   Statistical concepts
   •   Key families
   •   Data set administration segments


                                             42
•   Array structure
   •   Data segment(s)
   •   Attributes
   •   End of message administration
   •   End of interchange administration


The information model representation in UML (Unified Modelling Language)




                                           43
4. Public understanding and involvement


4.1 Public consultations
The easiest way to prepare for data dissemination to the public – being the specific
purpose the setup of a Citizens’ Budget or the release of detailed / raw data on public
finance operations - would be in foreseeing a fully public involvement since its planning.
That would imply, from the government side, the organization of consultation with
civil society groups and periodical public polls during which citizens are asked to
express their wishes about what data they are interested in.
In this context, civil society organizations play an important role as facilitators of a broad
policy dialogue. For this reason, it is important to involve these organizations in the
consultation processes. Being the budget an issue, which affects many sectors of the
society, it should be particularly encouraged a coherent approach to representation of civil
society organizations at all level.
A consultation relationship between the Government and interested parties should be
underpinned by certain fundamental principles. These principles define the environment
within which they will both operate. They also constitute the basis for any future
developments in the area of consultation policy. The principles should include the
following principles:
       Participation: to ensure wide participation throughout the policy chain from
       conception to implementation
       Openness and accountability: The policy-making process must be visible to the
       outside world if it must be understood and have credibility. Thus consultation
       processes have to be transparent, both to those who are directly involved and to
       the general public. It must be clear:
              what issues are being developed
              what mechanisms are being used to consult
              who is being consulted and why
              what has influenced decisions in the formulation of policy.
It follows that interested parties must themselves operate in an environment that is
transparent, so that the public is aware of the parties involved in the consultation
processes and how they conduct themselves. Openness and accountability are thus
important principles for the conduct of organizations when they are seeking to contribute
to the budget policy development. It must be apparent:
              which interests they represent
              how inclusive that representation is.
All communications relating to consultation should be clear and concise, and should
include all necessary information to facilitate responses. The information in publicity and
consultation documents should include:
                                               44
A summary of the context, scope and objectives of consultation, including a
      description of the specific issues open for discussion or questions with particular
      importance for the Government
      Details of any hearings, meetings or conferences, where relevant
      Contact details and deadlines
      Explanation of the Government's processes for dealing with contributions, what
      feed-back to expect, and details of the next stages involved in the development of
      the policy
      If not enclosed, reference to related documentation
      The exact time limit for the consultation
Finally, the receipt of contributions should be acknowledged. Results of open public
consultation should be displayed on websites linked to the single access point on the
Internet. Depending on the number of comments received and the resources available,
acknowledgement can take the form of:
             an individual response (by e-mail or acknowledgement slip), or
             a collective response (by e-mail or on the Government's single access point
             for consultation on the Internet).

Results of other forms of consultation should, as far as possible, also be subject to public
scrutiny on the single access point on the Internet. The Government should then provide
adequate feedback to responding parties and to the public at large. To this end,
explanatory memoranda accompanying the decisions taken following the consultation
process should include the results of these consultations and an explanation as to how
these were conducted and how the results were taken into account.



4.1 Promoting data use and re-use through websites and competitions
An important step for citizen involvement is to encourage them to make use of the data.
This is particularly true when it comes to “open data”. A first step is setting up a
dedicated website (see Box 10).




                                            45
Box 10: Suggestions for a dedicated website
The Website should include two main sections: a public page to be accessed by
everyone, and an Intranet devoted to specific target groups like the media and other
key stakeholders which can be involved by the administration’s staff.
The typical focus of the web site may include
              A description of the data contents and structure of the data files (“meta-
              data”)
              The data files (preferably in a comma-separated, tab-separated values or
              xml formats)
              Some key documentation, for further information
              Link to aggregate or summary tables and figures
              News and Events related to the budget data presentation
              A devoted newsletter and automatic emailing list
              A section devoted to Media relations
              FAQs and Ask-the-Expert
              Links
              Contacts
              Forums to allow the interaction with the citizens


The Documentation section should contain all the official documentation related to the
budget a kind of specifics related to the budget explanation.
The News and Events section should contain information on any major news related to
the budget presentation to the public (conferences, press conferences, workshops).
The Media section should be devoted to the interaction with journalists. It could be
organised as an Intranet provided with some public information. The Intranet should
contain press releases and information on initiatives exclusively addressed to
journalists. The public section should provide useful links and a glossary of the most
commonly used terms that could be of interest also to other Target Groups.
The Newsletter section should make newsletters available if foreseen as a
communication tool for the data being disseminated and be arranged by publication
date, starting from the most recent. It can be available on the website and automatically
send to a emailing list.
FAQs and Ask-the-Expert section (FAQs) should provide the most common questions
and related answers. If the user does not find answers to his/her question in the FAQ
list, he/she can access the “Ask-the-Expert” section, where to ask questions through
on-line forms. The “Ask-the-Expert” section should be organized as a feedback section,
in which general public can pose questions, make comments, and receive answers.
The Links section should contain a list of useful links to other relevant websites, both at
national, European and international level.
The Contact section should provide the names and respective roles of the staffs in
charge..
The Website could also be provided with discussion forums in order to collect general
public opinions and feelings toward the issue.

                                            46
Another very popular way to promote data use is to set up competitions and prizes
where citizens and programmers can work together on the data and make it more
meaningful.
The typical structure of these competitions is that a number of datasets are released and
programmers then have a short time-frame - running from a couple of days to to a few
weeks - to develop applications using the data. A prize is then awarded to the best
application. Competitions have been held in a number of countries including the UK, the
US, Norway, Australia, Spain, Denmark, Finland and Italy.




 Examples of open data competitions


        Apps for Democracy, one of the first competitions in the United States, launched in October
        2008 by Vivek Kundra, at the time Chief Technology Officer (CTO) of the District of Columbia
        Government
        http://www.appsfordemocracy.org/
         Abre Datos (Open Data) Challenge, first held in Spain in April 2010, where developers where
        invited to to create open source applications making use of public data in just 48 hours.
        http://www.abredatos.es/
        Nettskap 2.0 launched In April 2010 by the Norwegian Ministry for Government Administration
        where Norwegian developers – companies, public agencies or individuals – were challenged to
        come up with web-based project ideas in the areas of service development, efficient work
        processes, and increased democratic participation
        http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/fad/kampanjer/nettskap.html?id=635971
        Apps4Itlay, a competition open to all EU citizens, associations, developer communities and
        firms willing to develop innovative applications based on the re-use of Public Sector Information
        (Open Data) launched in 2011.
        http://www.appsforitaly.org/




                                                    47
These Guidelines were drafted as part of Activity 1.7 of the EU Twining project “Improving
Data Quality in Public Accounts”.
Resident Twinning Advisor: Mauro Barbini
Component responsible: Yusuf Akkoyun
The document was prepared by:
Aline Pennisi (Ministry of economy and finance - Italy; e-mail: aline.pennisi@tesoro.it)
Giuseppe Florio (Ministry of economy and finance -Italy; e-mail: giuseppe.florio@tesoro.it)
Claudia Salvi (FormezPA - Italy; e-mail: csalvi@formez.it)
Carlo Vaccari (FormezPA / Istat - Italy; email: vaccari@istat.it)


                                              48

More Related Content

What's hot

Comments from PEMPAL on draft OECD shared toolkit on budget transparency - D...
Comments from PEMPAL on draft OECD shared toolkit on budget transparency -  D...Comments from PEMPAL on draft OECD shared toolkit on budget transparency -  D...
Comments from PEMPAL on draft OECD shared toolkit on budget transparency - D...OECD Governance
 
Towards a Framework for the Governance of Infrastructure
Towards a Framework for the Governance of InfrastructureTowards a Framework for the Governance of Infrastructure
Towards a Framework for the Governance of InfrastructureOECD Governance
 
Keeping Promises, Measuring Results: The Global Strategy and Accountability f...
Keeping Promises, Measuring Results: The Global Strategy and Accountability f...Keeping Promises, Measuring Results: The Global Strategy and Accountability f...
Keeping Promises, Measuring Results: The Global Strategy and Accountability f...EveryWomanEveryChild
 
Africa's partnership forum ict in africa boosting economic growth and povert...
Africa's partnership forum ict in africa  boosting economic growth and povert...Africa's partnership forum ict in africa  boosting economic growth and povert...
Africa's partnership forum ict in africa boosting economic growth and povert...Dr Lendy Spires
 
Public Private Partnership Brochure May2012
Public Private Partnership Brochure May2012Public Private Partnership Brochure May2012
Public Private Partnership Brochure May2012Ezzedin Tago
 
Better future for social economy EU policy
Better future for social economy EU policyBetter future for social economy EU policy
Better future for social economy EU policyLucie Evers
 
Gender Budgeting - Ronnie Downes, Elena Gentili, OECD
Gender Budgeting - Ronnie Downes, Elena Gentili, OECDGender Budgeting - Ronnie Downes, Elena Gentili, OECD
Gender Budgeting - Ronnie Downes, Elena Gentili, OECDOECD Governance
 
Benchmaking 15 National Broadband Plans
Benchmaking 15 National Broadband PlansBenchmaking 15 National Broadband Plans
Benchmaking 15 National Broadband PlansEricsson
 
Cambodia, decentralization and deconcentration; progress and issues, august 2011
Cambodia, decentralization and deconcentration; progress and issues, august 2011Cambodia, decentralization and deconcentration; progress and issues, august 2011
Cambodia, decentralization and deconcentration; progress and issues, august 2011Jean-Marc Lepain
 
FINANCING FOR DEVELOPMENT IN CHAD
FINANCING FOR DEVELOPMENT IN CHADFINANCING FOR DEVELOPMENT IN CHAD
FINANCING FOR DEVELOPMENT IN CHADAndréas Koumato
 
Outcome of the fourth united nations conference on the least developed countr...
Outcome of the fourth united nations conference on the least developed countr...Outcome of the fourth united nations conference on the least developed countr...
Outcome of the fourth united nations conference on the least developed countr...Dr Lendy Spires
 
2011 12-07 esg nasjonale felleskomponenter en
2011 12-07 esg nasjonale felleskomponenter en2011 12-07 esg nasjonale felleskomponenter en
2011 12-07 esg nasjonale felleskomponenter enEllen Stralberg
 

What's hot (15)

Future government a global perspective in connection to open government
Future governmenta global perspective in connection to open governmentFuture governmenta global perspective in connection to open government
Future government a global perspective in connection to open government
 
Comments from PEMPAL on draft OECD shared toolkit on budget transparency - D...
Comments from PEMPAL on draft OECD shared toolkit on budget transparency -  D...Comments from PEMPAL on draft OECD shared toolkit on budget transparency -  D...
Comments from PEMPAL on draft OECD shared toolkit on budget transparency - D...
 
Towards a Framework for the Governance of Infrastructure
Towards a Framework for the Governance of InfrastructureTowards a Framework for the Governance of Infrastructure
Towards a Framework for the Governance of Infrastructure
 
Keeping Promises, Measuring Results: The Global Strategy and Accountability f...
Keeping Promises, Measuring Results: The Global Strategy and Accountability f...Keeping Promises, Measuring Results: The Global Strategy and Accountability f...
Keeping Promises, Measuring Results: The Global Strategy and Accountability f...
 
Community en
Community enCommunity en
Community en
 
Africa's partnership forum ict in africa boosting economic growth and povert...
Africa's partnership forum ict in africa  boosting economic growth and povert...Africa's partnership forum ict in africa  boosting economic growth and povert...
Africa's partnership forum ict in africa boosting economic growth and povert...
 
Public Private Partnership Brochure May2012
Public Private Partnership Brochure May2012Public Private Partnership Brochure May2012
Public Private Partnership Brochure May2012
 
Better future for social economy EU policy
Better future for social economy EU policyBetter future for social economy EU policy
Better future for social economy EU policy
 
Gender Budgeting - Ronnie Downes, Elena Gentili, OECD
Gender Budgeting - Ronnie Downes, Elena Gentili, OECDGender Budgeting - Ronnie Downes, Elena Gentili, OECD
Gender Budgeting - Ronnie Downes, Elena Gentili, OECD
 
Development and Functioning of Civil Dialogue in the Western Balkans
Development and Functioning of Civil Dialogue in the Western BalkansDevelopment and Functioning of Civil Dialogue in the Western Balkans
Development and Functioning of Civil Dialogue in the Western Balkans
 
Benchmaking 15 National Broadband Plans
Benchmaking 15 National Broadband PlansBenchmaking 15 National Broadband Plans
Benchmaking 15 National Broadband Plans
 
Cambodia, decentralization and deconcentration; progress and issues, august 2011
Cambodia, decentralization and deconcentration; progress and issues, august 2011Cambodia, decentralization and deconcentration; progress and issues, august 2011
Cambodia, decentralization and deconcentration; progress and issues, august 2011
 
FINANCING FOR DEVELOPMENT IN CHAD
FINANCING FOR DEVELOPMENT IN CHADFINANCING FOR DEVELOPMENT IN CHAD
FINANCING FOR DEVELOPMENT IN CHAD
 
Outcome of the fourth united nations conference on the least developed countr...
Outcome of the fourth united nations conference on the least developed countr...Outcome of the fourth united nations conference on the least developed countr...
Outcome of the fourth united nations conference on the least developed countr...
 
2011 12-07 esg nasjonale felleskomponenter en
2011 12-07 esg nasjonale felleskomponenter en2011 12-07 esg nasjonale felleskomponenter en
2011 12-07 esg nasjonale felleskomponenter en
 

Viewers also liked

Social network and job searching and SN for researchers
Social network and job searching and SN for researchersSocial network and job searching and SN for researchers
Social network and job searching and SN for researchersCarlo Vaccari
 
ConfSL 2010: open source in INAIL e Istat
ConfSL 2010: open source in INAIL e IstatConfSL 2010: open source in INAIL e Istat
ConfSL 2010: open source in INAIL e IstatCarlo Vaccari
 
Software 2009 - meeting unibz
Software 2009 - meeting unibzSoftware 2009 - meeting unibz
Software 2009 - meeting unibzCarlo Vaccari
 
Sharing Advisory Board newsletter #8
Sharing Advisory Board newsletter #8Sharing Advisory Board newsletter #8
Sharing Advisory Board newsletter #8Carlo Vaccari
 
Core kick off vaccari
Core kick off vaccariCore kick off vaccari
Core kick off vaccariCarlo Vaccari
 
IT tools for statistics, visualization, open data
IT tools for statistics, visualization, open dataIT tools for statistics, visualization, open data
IT tools for statistics, visualization, open dataCarlo Vaccari
 
CORE final workshop introduction
CORE final workshop introductionCORE final workshop introduction
CORE final workshop introductionCarlo Vaccari
 
CORE ESSnet Report @MSIS 2011
CORE ESSnet Report @MSIS 2011CORE ESSnet Report @MSIS 2011
CORE ESSnet Report @MSIS 2011Carlo Vaccari
 
Yves Studer: Big Data in practice
Yves Studer: Big Data in practiceYves Studer: Big Data in practice
Yves Studer: Big Data in practiceCarlo Vaccari
 
2. Evoluzione del Web: dal Web 1.0 al Web 2.0
2. Evoluzione del Web: dal Web 1.0 al Web 2.02. Evoluzione del Web: dal Web 1.0 al Web 2.0
2. Evoluzione del Web: dal Web 1.0 al Web 2.0Roberto Polillo
 

Viewers also liked (12)

Social network and job searching and SN for researchers
Social network and job searching and SN for researchersSocial network and job searching and SN for researchers
Social network and job searching and SN for researchers
 
ConfSL 2010: open source in INAIL e Istat
ConfSL 2010: open source in INAIL e IstatConfSL 2010: open source in INAIL e Istat
ConfSL 2010: open source in INAIL e Istat
 
Software 2009 - meeting unibz
Software 2009 - meeting unibzSoftware 2009 - meeting unibz
Software 2009 - meeting unibz
 
CORA for MSIS 2010
CORA for MSIS 2010CORA for MSIS 2010
CORA for MSIS 2010
 
Web 2.0 dirigenti
Web 2.0 dirigentiWeb 2.0 dirigenti
Web 2.0 dirigenti
 
Sharing Advisory Board newsletter #8
Sharing Advisory Board newsletter #8Sharing Advisory Board newsletter #8
Sharing Advisory Board newsletter #8
 
Core kick off vaccari
Core kick off vaccariCore kick off vaccari
Core kick off vaccari
 
IT tools for statistics, visualization, open data
IT tools for statistics, visualization, open dataIT tools for statistics, visualization, open data
IT tools for statistics, visualization, open data
 
CORE final workshop introduction
CORE final workshop introductionCORE final workshop introduction
CORE final workshop introduction
 
CORE ESSnet Report @MSIS 2011
CORE ESSnet Report @MSIS 2011CORE ESSnet Report @MSIS 2011
CORE ESSnet Report @MSIS 2011
 
Yves Studer: Big Data in practice
Yves Studer: Big Data in practiceYves Studer: Big Data in practice
Yves Studer: Big Data in practice
 
2. Evoluzione del Web: dal Web 1.0 al Web 2.0
2. Evoluzione del Web: dal Web 1.0 al Web 2.02. Evoluzione del Web: dal Web 1.0 al Web 2.0
2. Evoluzione del Web: dal Web 1.0 al Web 2.0
 

Similar to Guidelines for Public Finance Data Dissemination and Access

Fiscal Transparency - Delphine MORETTI, OECD (English)
Fiscal Transparency - Delphine MORETTI, OECD (English)Fiscal Transparency - Delphine MORETTI, OECD (English)
Fiscal Transparency - Delphine MORETTI, OECD (English)OECD Governance
 
The Open Budget Survey 2010
The Open Budget Survey 2010The Open Budget Survey 2010
The Open Budget Survey 2010icgfmconference
 
Budget Transparency by Katharina Zuegel - OECD
Budget Transparency by Katharina Zuegel - OECDBudget Transparency by Katharina Zuegel - OECD
Budget Transparency by Katharina Zuegel - OECDOECD Governance
 
Budget transparency - Ronnie DOWNES, OECD
Budget transparency - Ronnie DOWNES, OECDBudget transparency - Ronnie DOWNES, OECD
Budget transparency - Ronnie DOWNES, OECDOECD Governance
 
OECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium - Elena Mondo
OECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium - Elena MondoOECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium - Elena Mondo
OECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium - Elena MondoOECD Governance
 
eGov 2.0 keys to success white paper June2009
eGov 2.0 keys to success white paper June2009eGov 2.0 keys to success white paper June2009
eGov 2.0 keys to success white paper June2009etienneveyret
 
OpenCoesione - The Italian open government strategy on cohesion policy
OpenCoesione - The Italian open government strategy on cohesion policyOpenCoesione - The Italian open government strategy on cohesion policy
OpenCoesione - The Italian open government strategy on cohesion policyOpenCoesione
 
OpenCoesione - The Italian open government strategy on cohesion policy
OpenCoesione - The Italian open government strategy on cohesion policyOpenCoesione - The Italian open government strategy on cohesion policy
OpenCoesione - The Italian open government strategy on cohesion policyLuigi Reggi
 
International guidelines for data dissemination and fiscal transparency
International guidelines for data dissemination and fiscal transparencyInternational guidelines for data dissemination and fiscal transparency
International guidelines for data dissemination and fiscal transparencyCarlo Vaccari
 
PPP Reference Guide Version 3 - PPP Framework.pdf
PPP Reference Guide Version 3 - PPP Framework.pdfPPP Reference Guide Version 3 - PPP Framework.pdf
PPP Reference Guide Version 3 - PPP Framework.pdfssusered96e2
 
Delivering-Results-Across-Agencies.pdf
Delivering-Results-Across-Agencies.pdfDelivering-Results-Across-Agencies.pdf
Delivering-Results-Across-Agencies.pdfOECD Governance
 
MONITORING, TRANSPARENCY AND CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT: THE OPENCOESIONE INITIATIVE
MONITORING, TRANSPARENCY AND CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT:THE OPENCOESIONE INITIATIVEMONITORING, TRANSPARENCY AND CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT:THE OPENCOESIONE INITIATIVE
MONITORING, TRANSPARENCY AND CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT: THE OPENCOESIONE INITIATIVEOpenCoesione
 
Recent public financial management publications and other resources
Recent public financial management publications and other resourcesRecent public financial management publications and other resources
Recent public financial management publications and other resourcesicgfmconference
 
General Assembly: Innovative Mechanisms of Financing for Development Report o...
General Assembly: Innovative Mechanisms of Financing for Development Report o...General Assembly: Innovative Mechanisms of Financing for Development Report o...
General Assembly: Innovative Mechanisms of Financing for Development Report o...Dr Lendy Spires
 
Advancing the frontiers of transparency and accountability in the extractives...
Advancing the frontiers of transparency and accountability in the extractives...Advancing the frontiers of transparency and accountability in the extractives...
Advancing the frontiers of transparency and accountability in the extractives...Institute of Development Studies
 
Wsis10 alf reporting-c1.summary
Wsis10 alf reporting-c1.summaryWsis10 alf reporting-c1.summary
Wsis10 alf reporting-c1.summaryDr Lendy Spires
 

Similar to Guidelines for Public Finance Data Dissemination and Access (20)

Fiscal Transparency - Delphine MORETTI, OECD (English)
Fiscal Transparency - Delphine MORETTI, OECD (English)Fiscal Transparency - Delphine MORETTI, OECD (English)
Fiscal Transparency - Delphine MORETTI, OECD (English)
 
The Open Budget Survey 2010
The Open Budget Survey 2010The Open Budget Survey 2010
The Open Budget Survey 2010
 
Budget Transparency by Katharina Zuegel - OECD
Budget Transparency by Katharina Zuegel - OECDBudget Transparency by Katharina Zuegel - OECD
Budget Transparency by Katharina Zuegel - OECD
 
Profile of the Swedish National Audit Office, SIGMA conference 16 December 2014
Profile of the Swedish National Audit Office, SIGMA conference 16 December 2014Profile of the Swedish National Audit Office, SIGMA conference 16 December 2014
Profile of the Swedish National Audit Office, SIGMA conference 16 December 2014
 
Budget transparency - Ronnie DOWNES, OECD
Budget transparency - Ronnie DOWNES, OECDBudget transparency - Ronnie DOWNES, OECD
Budget transparency - Ronnie DOWNES, OECD
 
OECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium - Elena Mondo
OECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium - Elena MondoOECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium - Elena Mondo
OECD Public Sector Accruals Symposium - Elena Mondo
 
eGov 2.0 keys to success white paper June2009
eGov 2.0 keys to success white paper June2009eGov 2.0 keys to success white paper June2009
eGov 2.0 keys to success white paper June2009
 
OpenCoesione - The Italian open government strategy on cohesion policy
OpenCoesione - The Italian open government strategy on cohesion policyOpenCoesione - The Italian open government strategy on cohesion policy
OpenCoesione - The Italian open government strategy on cohesion policy
 
OpenCoesione - The Italian open government strategy on cohesion policy
OpenCoesione - The Italian open government strategy on cohesion policyOpenCoesione - The Italian open government strategy on cohesion policy
OpenCoesione - The Italian open government strategy on cohesion policy
 
International guidelines for data dissemination and fiscal transparency
International guidelines for data dissemination and fiscal transparencyInternational guidelines for data dissemination and fiscal transparency
International guidelines for data dissemination and fiscal transparency
 
PPP Reference Guide Version 3 - PPP Framework.pdf
PPP Reference Guide Version 3 - PPP Framework.pdfPPP Reference Guide Version 3 - PPP Framework.pdf
PPP Reference Guide Version 3 - PPP Framework.pdf
 
Delivering-Results-Across-Agencies.pdf
Delivering-Results-Across-Agencies.pdfDelivering-Results-Across-Agencies.pdf
Delivering-Results-Across-Agencies.pdf
 
Vision 2020 Presentation
Vision 2020 Presentation Vision 2020 Presentation
Vision 2020 Presentation
 
MONITORING, TRANSPARENCY AND CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT: THE OPENCOESIONE INITIATIVE
MONITORING, TRANSPARENCY AND CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT:THE OPENCOESIONE INITIATIVEMONITORING, TRANSPARENCY AND CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT:THE OPENCOESIONE INITIATIVE
MONITORING, TRANSPARENCY AND CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT: THE OPENCOESIONE INITIATIVE
 
Recent public financial management publications and other resources
Recent public financial management publications and other resourcesRecent public financial management publications and other resources
Recent public financial management publications and other resources
 
General Assembly: Innovative Mechanisms of Financing for Development Report o...
General Assembly: Innovative Mechanisms of Financing for Development Report o...General Assembly: Innovative Mechanisms of Financing for Development Report o...
General Assembly: Innovative Mechanisms of Financing for Development Report o...
 
Efficiency and effectiveness in public administration reform
Efficiency and effectiveness in public administration reform Efficiency and effectiveness in public administration reform
Efficiency and effectiveness in public administration reform
 
Advancing the frontiers of transparency and accountability in the extractives...
Advancing the frontiers of transparency and accountability in the extractives...Advancing the frontiers of transparency and accountability in the extractives...
Advancing the frontiers of transparency and accountability in the extractives...
 
20151209 financing for development manuel ancizu
20151209 financing for development   manuel ancizu20151209 financing for development   manuel ancizu
20151209 financing for development manuel ancizu
 
Wsis10 alf reporting-c1.summary
Wsis10 alf reporting-c1.summaryWsis10 alf reporting-c1.summary
Wsis10 alf reporting-c1.summary
 

More from Carlo Vaccari

HLG Big Data project and Sandbox
HLG Big Data project and SandboxHLG Big Data project and Sandbox
HLG Big Data project and SandboxCarlo Vaccari
 
I Big Data e la Statistica: un progetto internazionale
I Big Data e la Statistica: un progetto internazionaleI Big Data e la Statistica: un progetto internazionale
I Big Data e la Statistica: un progetto internazionaleCarlo Vaccari
 
Andrea Talamonti: CKAN a tool for Open Data
Andrea Talamonti: CKAN a tool for Open DataAndrea Talamonti: CKAN a tool for Open Data
Andrea Talamonti: CKAN a tool for Open DataCarlo Vaccari
 
Fabrizio Allegretto: Open Data & University
Fabrizio Allegretto: Open Data & UniversityFabrizio Allegretto: Open Data & University
Fabrizio Allegretto: Open Data & UniversityCarlo Vaccari
 
Yapo Juares Tanguy: RSS environment
Yapo Juares Tanguy: RSS environmentYapo Juares Tanguy: RSS environment
Yapo Juares Tanguy: RSS environmentCarlo Vaccari
 
Matteo Marchionne: Foaf e feed reader
Matteo Marchionne: Foaf e feed readerMatteo Marchionne: Foaf e feed reader
Matteo Marchionne: Foaf e feed readerCarlo Vaccari
 
Alex Haechler: China vs USA social networks
Alex Haechler: China vs USA social networksAlex Haechler: China vs USA social networks
Alex Haechler: China vs USA social networksCarlo Vaccari
 
Carlo Colicchio: Big Data for business
Carlo Colicchio: Big Data for businessCarlo Colicchio: Big Data for business
Carlo Colicchio: Big Data for businessCarlo Vaccari
 
Klevis Mino: MongoDB
Klevis Mino: MongoDBKlevis Mino: MongoDB
Klevis Mino: MongoDBCarlo Vaccari
 
Rando Veizi: Data warehouse and Pentaho suite
Rando Veizi: Data warehouse and Pentaho suiteRando Veizi: Data warehouse and Pentaho suite
Rando Veizi: Data warehouse and Pentaho suiteCarlo Vaccari
 
Unkan Erol: Xing vs Linkedin
Unkan Erol: Xing vs LinkedinUnkan Erol: Xing vs Linkedin
Unkan Erol: Xing vs LinkedinCarlo Vaccari
 
Big Data Conference Ottobre 2013
Big Data Conference Ottobre 2013Big Data Conference Ottobre 2013
Big Data Conference Ottobre 2013Carlo Vaccari
 
Big data analytics vaccari oct2013
Big data analytics vaccari oct2013Big data analytics vaccari oct2013
Big data analytics vaccari oct2013Carlo Vaccari
 
Serena Carota: Open Data nella Regione Marche
Serena Carota: Open Data nella Regione MarcheSerena Carota: Open Data nella Regione Marche
Serena Carota: Open Data nella Regione MarcheCarlo Vaccari
 
Introduzione ai Social network
Introduzione ai Social network  Introduzione ai Social network
Introduzione ai Social network Carlo Vaccari
 
Social network ,ricerca di lavoro e ricerca scientifica
Social network ,ricerca di lavoro e ricerca scientificaSocial network ,ricerca di lavoro e ricerca scientifica
Social network ,ricerca di lavoro e ricerca scientificaCarlo Vaccari
 
Social networks , Job Searching and Research - 1
Social networks , Job Searching and Research - 1Social networks , Job Searching and Research - 1
Social networks , Job Searching and Research - 1Carlo Vaccari
 
Seminario su Open data - UniCam 18.4.2013
Seminario su Open data - UniCam 18.4.2013Seminario su Open data - UniCam 18.4.2013
Seminario su Open data - UniCam 18.4.2013Carlo Vaccari
 
Turismo e social network
Turismo e social networkTurismo e social network
Turismo e social networkCarlo Vaccari
 

More from Carlo Vaccari (20)

HLG Big Data project and Sandbox
HLG Big Data project and SandboxHLG Big Data project and Sandbox
HLG Big Data project and Sandbox
 
I Big Data e la Statistica: un progetto internazionale
I Big Data e la Statistica: un progetto internazionaleI Big Data e la Statistica: un progetto internazionale
I Big Data e la Statistica: un progetto internazionale
 
Andrea Talamonti: CKAN a tool for Open Data
Andrea Talamonti: CKAN a tool for Open DataAndrea Talamonti: CKAN a tool for Open Data
Andrea Talamonti: CKAN a tool for Open Data
 
Fabrizio Allegretto: Open Data & University
Fabrizio Allegretto: Open Data & UniversityFabrizio Allegretto: Open Data & University
Fabrizio Allegretto: Open Data & University
 
Yapo Juares Tanguy: RSS environment
Yapo Juares Tanguy: RSS environmentYapo Juares Tanguy: RSS environment
Yapo Juares Tanguy: RSS environment
 
Matteo Marchionne: Foaf e feed reader
Matteo Marchionne: Foaf e feed readerMatteo Marchionne: Foaf e feed reader
Matteo Marchionne: Foaf e feed reader
 
Alex Haechler: China vs USA social networks
Alex Haechler: China vs USA social networksAlex Haechler: China vs USA social networks
Alex Haechler: China vs USA social networks
 
Carlo Colicchio: Big Data for business
Carlo Colicchio: Big Data for businessCarlo Colicchio: Big Data for business
Carlo Colicchio: Big Data for business
 
Klevis Mino: MongoDB
Klevis Mino: MongoDBKlevis Mino: MongoDB
Klevis Mino: MongoDB
 
Rando Veizi: Data warehouse and Pentaho suite
Rando Veizi: Data warehouse and Pentaho suiteRando Veizi: Data warehouse and Pentaho suite
Rando Veizi: Data warehouse and Pentaho suite
 
Unkan Erol: Xing vs Linkedin
Unkan Erol: Xing vs LinkedinUnkan Erol: Xing vs Linkedin
Unkan Erol: Xing vs Linkedin
 
Big Data Conference Ottobre 2013
Big Data Conference Ottobre 2013Big Data Conference Ottobre 2013
Big Data Conference Ottobre 2013
 
Big data analytics vaccari oct2013
Big data analytics vaccari oct2013Big data analytics vaccari oct2013
Big data analytics vaccari oct2013
 
Serena Carota: Open Data nella Regione Marche
Serena Carota: Open Data nella Regione MarcheSerena Carota: Open Data nella Regione Marche
Serena Carota: Open Data nella Regione Marche
 
Introduzione ai Social network
Introduzione ai Social network  Introduzione ai Social network
Introduzione ai Social network
 
Start up innovative
Start up innovativeStart up innovative
Start up innovative
 
Social network ,ricerca di lavoro e ricerca scientifica
Social network ,ricerca di lavoro e ricerca scientificaSocial network ,ricerca di lavoro e ricerca scientifica
Social network ,ricerca di lavoro e ricerca scientifica
 
Social networks , Job Searching and Research - 1
Social networks , Job Searching and Research - 1Social networks , Job Searching and Research - 1
Social networks , Job Searching and Research - 1
 
Seminario su Open data - UniCam 18.4.2013
Seminario su Open data - UniCam 18.4.2013Seminario su Open data - UniCam 18.4.2013
Seminario su Open data - UniCam 18.4.2013
 
Turismo e social network
Turismo e social networkTurismo e social network
Turismo e social network
 

Recently uploaded

Designing A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URLDesigning A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URLRuncy Oommen
 
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve DecarbonizationUsing IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve DecarbonizationIES VE
 
KubeConEU24-Monitoring Kubernetes and Cloud Spend with OpenCost
KubeConEU24-Monitoring Kubernetes and Cloud Spend with OpenCostKubeConEU24-Monitoring Kubernetes and Cloud Spend with OpenCost
KubeConEU24-Monitoring Kubernetes and Cloud Spend with OpenCostMatt Ray
 
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystem
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystemBird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystem
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystemAsko Soukka
 
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation DevelopersUiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation DevelopersUiPathCommunity
 
COMPUTER 10 Lesson 8 - Building a Website
COMPUTER 10 Lesson 8 - Building a WebsiteCOMPUTER 10 Lesson 8 - Building a Website
COMPUTER 10 Lesson 8 - Building a Websitedgelyza
 
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...Will Schroeder
 
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptxCybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptxGDSC PJATK
 
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just Minutes
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just MinutesAI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just Minutes
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just MinutesMd Hossain Ali
 
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and IstioComparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and IstioChristian Posta
 
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1DianaGray10
 
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration Workflows
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration WorkflowsIgniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration Workflows
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration WorkflowsSafe Software
 
Empowering Africa's Next Generation: The AI Leadership Blueprint
Empowering Africa's Next Generation: The AI Leadership BlueprintEmpowering Africa's Next Generation: The AI Leadership Blueprint
Empowering Africa's Next Generation: The AI Leadership BlueprintMahmoud Rabie
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 6
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 6UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 6
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 6DianaGray10
 
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdf
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdf
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfJamie (Taka) Wang
 
Building AI-Driven Apps Using Semantic Kernel.pptx
Building AI-Driven Apps Using Semantic Kernel.pptxBuilding AI-Driven Apps Using Semantic Kernel.pptx
Building AI-Driven Apps Using Semantic Kernel.pptxUdaiappa Ramachandran
 
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 WorkshopNIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 WorkshopBachir Benyammi
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Designing A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URLDesigning A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URL
 
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve DecarbonizationUsing IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
 
20230104 - machine vision
20230104 - machine vision20230104 - machine vision
20230104 - machine vision
 
KubeConEU24-Monitoring Kubernetes and Cloud Spend with OpenCost
KubeConEU24-Monitoring Kubernetes and Cloud Spend with OpenCostKubeConEU24-Monitoring Kubernetes and Cloud Spend with OpenCost
KubeConEU24-Monitoring Kubernetes and Cloud Spend with OpenCost
 
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystem
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystemBird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystem
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystem
 
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation DevelopersUiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
 
COMPUTER 10 Lesson 8 - Building a Website
COMPUTER 10 Lesson 8 - Building a WebsiteCOMPUTER 10 Lesson 8 - Building a Website
COMPUTER 10 Lesson 8 - Building a Website
 
20150722 - AGV
20150722 - AGV20150722 - AGV
20150722 - AGV
 
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...
 
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptxCybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
 
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just Minutes
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just MinutesAI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just Minutes
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just Minutes
 
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and IstioComparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
 
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
 
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration Workflows
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration WorkflowsIgniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration Workflows
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration Workflows
 
Empowering Africa's Next Generation: The AI Leadership Blueprint
Empowering Africa's Next Generation: The AI Leadership BlueprintEmpowering Africa's Next Generation: The AI Leadership Blueprint
Empowering Africa's Next Generation: The AI Leadership Blueprint
 
201610817 - edge part1
201610817 - edge part1201610817 - edge part1
201610817 - edge part1
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 6
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 6UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 6
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 6
 
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdf
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdf
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdf
 
Building AI-Driven Apps Using Semantic Kernel.pptx
Building AI-Driven Apps Using Semantic Kernel.pptxBuilding AI-Driven Apps Using Semantic Kernel.pptx
Building AI-Driven Apps Using Semantic Kernel.pptx
 
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 WorkshopNIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
 

Guidelines for Public Finance Data Dissemination and Access

  • 1. The Twining project, an institutional cooperation between Italy and Turkey, is co-financed by the European Union and the Republic of Turkey. EU TWINNING PROJECT “Improving Data Quality in Public Accounts” GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC FINANCE DATA DISSEMINATION AND ACCESS Final version Activity 1.7 May 2012 1
  • 2. Table of contents 1. Foreword.......................................................................................................................... 3 2. International requirements and good practices ................................................................ 4 2.1 International initiatives ................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Fundamental aspects of fiscal transparency and public accounts data dissemination5 Comprehensiveness ............................................................................................... 5 Reliability .............................................................................................................. 6 Comparability (in time and space) and timeliness .................................................... 7 Understandable to the public .................................................................................. 9 2.3 What is a Citizens’ Budget .......................................................................................... 9 Main elements of a Citizens’ Budget ...................................................................... 11 Citizens’ Budget style and format .......................................................................... 13 Citizens’ Budget dissemination .............................................................................. 13 2.4 New challenges for fiscal transparency: open government data ............................... 16 Some benefits of open data inside and outside the public administration................. 20 “Open” public finance data ................................................................................... 20 3. Technological solutions.................................................................................................. 28 3.1 System architecture for data dissemination at GDPA ............................................... 29 3.2 Geographical Information System (GIS) ................................................................... 32 3.3 Statistical tools for data management ....................................................................... 33 3.4 Data Warehouse ....................................................................................................... 34 3.5 Data Visualization ..................................................................................................... 35 3.6 Open Data tools ........................................................................................................ 39 3.7 Interoperability to data .............................................................................................. 40 4. Public understanding and involvement .......................................................................... 44 4.1 Public consultations .................................................................................................. 44 4.1 Promoting data use and re-use through websites and competitions ......................... 45 2
  • 3. 1. Foreword The foundation of modern public financial reporting lies in the communication of financial information about the government’s activities to citizens and their representatives in Parliament. Indeed, fiscal transparency is a key aspect of the accountability for the way in which governments raise taxes, borrow, and spend public money and, since the late nineties, it is increasingly a requirement of international obligations (e.g., within the IMF, the OECD and the European Union). Fiscal transparency requires providing information about past, present and future activities of government in collecting and allocating public resources and in a way that it be: • comprehensive, reliable, timely, comparable in time and space, understandable to the public • easily accessible, at detailed level (raw data), re-useable (i.e. open data) Although there is room for debate on the benefits of wide access to public finance details, there is a broad consensus on the fact that fiscal transparency is relevant for: • Better informed decisions (in government and outside it) o it helps to highlight potential risks to the fiscal outlook, resulting in an earlier and smoother fiscal policy response to changing economic conditions o it enables public debate which may improve resource allocation o greater oversight by civil society and international markets encourages governments to pursue sound economic policies and achieve greater financial stability • Increased accountability of policy action o it strengthens credibility and public understanding of macroeconomic policies and choices o it may enhance social consensus on difficult trade-offs in the context of limited resources and multiple demands • Increased accountability of public officials o tracking expenditure and knowing whether it has gone to where was planned makes it easier to detect (and reduce) corruption • Better access to capital markets o Investors are reassured by more transparent governments and therefore a more willing to facilitate access to international capital markets These Guidelines aim at improving the GDPA capacity for data publication and accessibility according to the following viewpoints: contents; technological solutions (IT architecture and software platforms) and public understanding and involvement (media, citizens, NGOs). Particular focus is made on opportunities for public accounts dissemination and communication through open data. Each topic is presented briefly and accompanied by a more extensive list of examples, references and websites. 3
  • 4. 2. International requirements and good practices 2.1 International initiatives Guidelines and assessments on the extent to which countries satisfy them are promoted by international organizations and civil society organizations. The major on-going initiatives are: 1) IMF Fiscal Transparency Code (since 1998, revised in 2007) In 1998, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) introduced a Code of Good Practices on Fiscal Transparency which led to a voluntary program of fiscal transparency assessments called fiscal transparency modules of Reports on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC). The Code provides a comprehensive framework for fiscal transparency and focuses on clear roles and responsibilities, transparent budget processes, public availability of information, and assurances of integrity. To expand and explain the principles of the Code, and to help guide the conduct of fiscal ROSCs, a Manual on Fiscal Transparency was released and revised in 2007. http://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/trans/code.htm http://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/trans/manual/intro.htm 2) OECD Best Practices for Budget Transparency (since 2001) The OECD best practices for budget transparency are a reference tool supporting the full disclosure of all relevant fiscal information in a timely and systematic manner and provide a series of best practices in the areas of principal budget reports, specific disclosures, quality, and integrity. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/13/1905258.pdf 3) Open Budget Initiative (since 2005) The International Budget Partnership conducts, in collaboration with civil society around the world, a biennial Open Budget Survey and Index, providing ratings of the openness of budget material in over 60 countries. The detailed and systematic survey of current practice is performed by local experts (in Turkey TESEV). The Index assesses the availability of key budget documents, the quantity of information they provide, and the timeliness of their dissemination to citizens in order to provide reliable information on each country’s commitment to budget transparency and accountability. http://www.openbudgetindex.org 4) Open Government Partnership (OGP) on Budget Transparency (since 2011) The Open Government Partnership is a multilateral initiative advance in 2011. It aim to secure commitments from governments to promote transparency, empower citizens, fight corruption, and harness new technologies to strengthen governance. OGP is overseen by a 4
  • 5. steering committee of eight governments and nine civil society organizations. It has a specific module on budget transparency and reporting standards. One of the core principles states “Transparency: information on government activities and decisions is open, comprehensive, timely, freely available to the public and meets basic open data standards (e.g. raw data, machine readability)” http://www.opengovpartnership.org/ Box 1: Key budget reports for the public Internationally accepted good practices require governments to publish at least eight key budget reports at various points in the budget year: • Pre-Budget Statement • Executive’s Budget Proposal • Enacted Budget • Citizens Budget • In-Year Monthly Reports • Mid-Year Review • Year-End Report • Audit Report. 2.2 Fundamental aspects of fiscal transparency and public accounts data dissemination The dissemination of data on public accounts should follow basic principles, such as comprehensiveness, reliability, timeliness, comparability in time and space, and being understandable to the public. Hereafter a selection of the main features connected to each principle. Comprehensiveness The budget documentation, including the final accounts, and other published fiscal reports should cover all budgetary and extra-budgetary activities: • Extra-budgetary activities are transactions of general government entities that are not included in the budget appropriation laws. Examples: o transactions related to commercial activities of government agencies (user fees) that are not included in their budgeted revenue and expenditure; o social security funds, o nonmarket nonprofit institutions, financed by government transfers or earmarked revenues o revolving funds o tax expenditures 5
  • 6. o contingent liabilities o quasi-fiscal activities • The central government should publish information on the level and composition of its debt and financial assets, significant non-debt liabilities (including pension rights, guarantee exposure, and other contractual obligations), and natural resource assets. • The budget documentation should report the fiscal position of sub-national governments and the finances of public corporations. • The overall balance and gross debt of the general government should be standard summary indicators of the government fiscal position. They should be supplemented, where appropriate, by other fiscal indicators, such as the primary balance, the public sector balance, and net debt. Reliability Fiscal data should meet accepted data quality standards, related to definitions and classifications: • accounting policies meet generally accepted accounting standards; • international standard classifications to be used for economic and functional descriptions (e.g. COFOG / SEC), on the side of national classifications and related to checking the data: • automated procedures are used to facilitate the monitoring of the accuracy of data reported by individual government sector units for internal consistency testing of each institution’s data (e.g., cross-checks). Data inconsistencies and out-of-trend values are confirmed with reporting units, and documented. • source data are assessed by checking across different sources (e.g., payables by one part of the general government are equal to receivables by another, checking independent creditor and debtor sources, and domestic bank financing records compared with banking records, etc.). • sound techniques are in place to estimate missing data, when relevant (to deal with coverage problems). • final accounts are fully reconciled with budget appropriations An in-depth treatment of this issue is found in the IMF’s July 2003 Data Quality Assessment Framework and Data Quality Program, at http://dsbb.imf.org/Pages/DQRS/Home.aspx and http://dsbb.imf.org/images/pdfs/dqrs_gfs.pdf 6
  • 7. Comparability (in time and space) and timeliness o fiscal aggregate outcomes are compared with previous forecasts and with outturns of previous years o international classifications, alongside national ones, are used for economic and functional representations (such as ESA95 and COFOG) o dissemination of advance-release calendars o simultaneous release to all interested parties Box 2: OECD Best Practices on monthly reports o Monthly updates on expenditures and revenues should show progress in implementing the budget: • They should be released within four weeks of the end of each month. • They should contain the amount of revenue and expenditure in each month and year- to-date. • A comparison should be made with the forecast amounts of monthly revenue and expenditure for the same period. Any in-year adjustments to the original forecast should be shown separately. • A brief commentary should accompany the numerical data. If a significant divergence between actual and forecast amounts occurs, an explanation should be made. • Expenditures should be classified by major administrative units (e.g., ministry, agency). Supplementary information classifying expenditure by economic and functional categories should also be presented. • Information on commitments should be provided in addition to information on payments • The reports should also contain information on the government’s borrowing activity Source: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/13/1905258.pdf 7
  • 8. Box 3: The Open Budget Index (OBI) for Turkey The Open Budget Index is an initiative of the International Budget Partnership. It assigns countries a transparency score on a 100-point scale using 92 questions from a detailed Survey focusing on whether the government provides the public with timely access to comprehensive information contained in eight key budget documents. The last Survey was conducted in 2010: According to the Open Budget Surveys conducted since 2006, Turkey’s ranking has consistently improved from 42 points over 100 in 2006 to 57 in 2010. The overall situation is comparable to several neighboring countries (including Italy), but it is lower than EU average. Figure 1: OBI Scores 2010 Turkey, Italy and other major EU countries • . Source: Open Budget Index 2010. The main OBI recommendations in 2010 for Turkey concerned the following data dissemination areas: • improving the comprehensiveness of the Executive’s Budget Proposal, Year-End Report and Audit Report (in particular by including information on extra-budgetary funds, quasi-fiscal activities, tax expenditures, contingent and future liabilities, and financial and other assets; and by helping to explain the relationship between the government’s revenue and expenditure plans and its policy and macroeconomic goals; and by adding information on outputs and outcomes) • publishing a Mid-Year Review and increasing data in Monthly In-Year reports (which lack information on the specific characteristics of external debt, such as maturity, interest rate and currency denomination) • producing a Citizens Budget; • providing opportunities for the public to testify at legislative hearings on the budget; • increasing the powers of the legislature to provide more comprehensive oversight not only when the budget is being approved but also during the budget execution period For more information see: http://internationalbudget.org/wp- content/uploads/2011/04/Turkey-OBI2010QuestionnaireFinal.pdf 8
  • 9. Understandable to the public The understanding of the budget process by individual citizens and non-governmental organizations should actively be promoted. In particular, the public should be provided with comprehensive information on past, current, and projected fiscal activity and on major fiscal risks. Fiscal information should be presented in a way that facilitates policy analysis and promotes accountability. Regularly reports, should be published in a simple language. There should be a commitment to make timely publication of fiscal information written in a simple language which can be easily understood by the public at large. The publication should also contain a description of the budget process, including the roles of the executive branch, in preparing the budget and of the legislature in authorising government taxation, borrowing, and expenditure. This objective can be achieved presenting fiscal information in a way that facilitates policy analysis: While selecting the information to public the following two concepts should be kept in mind Fiscal data should be reported on a gross basis, distinguishing revenue, expenditure, and financing Expenditure should be classified by economic, functional, and administrative category. In addition: o A clear and simple summary guide to the budget should be widely distributed at the time of the annual budget. o Budget presentations and accounts should contain clear statements of the government’s objectives (e.g. missions and programs) as well as a listing of the items on which money is spent (as in traditional line-item budgeting). o Results of previous policies should also be evaluated against their stated objectives, by measuring also measure outputs and outcomes in relation to these objectives. The government’s work is highly technical and to make public finance data understandable it is often not sufficient to simply disclose specialized documents e statistics. Promoting a Citizens’ Budget in a language that ordinary people can understand and appreciate is a way to facilitate communication to the public. 2.3 What is a Citizens’ Budget Financial data provided by governments are not always easily understood by the general public for various reasons: because they may be presented in a highly technical way, according to aggregates and categories relevant to the administrations operations but not the citizens main interests. This may impede citizens capability to understand where their 9
  • 10. financial contribution goes. A Citizens’ budget is a tool for empowering citizens to be aware of the budget process and to follow how budgetary resources are used. It is thus a tool to understand the whole budget process and its implementation and to contribute to accountability and transparency of service providers for public administrations. The International Budget Partnership (IBP) definition for Citizens’ Budget is “A citizen budget is a non-technical presentation of the government budget which is intended to enable the public-including those who are not familiar with public finance-understand government plans”. Generally speaking, a Citizens’ budget is a collective term for various ways to involve citizens in the budget process and allocation of financial resources. The concept was started in the late 1980s in the city of Porto Alegre (Brazil) and since then, it has spread to all continents and is currently active at country, regional and local level in many places around the world. Today, thanks to ICT technology, a Citizens’ budget can become an interactive tool for governments and public institutions to receive feedback from citizens on matters of public interest. Usually, a Citizens’ Budget is mainly aimed at the communication to the public Executive’s Budget Proposal. In this case it should be produced at the same time the budget is presented to the legislature. In some cases, the Citizens’ Budget is in fact based on the Enacted Budget or Budget Law and illustrates presenting the estimate of income received by the State, as well as the expenditures estimates that are authorized to the institutions so they can execute programs and projects; which in turn translates into public services financed by taxes that have been collected. However, a clear understanding of what has actually happened during the Budget Execution through the representation of the outturns/end-of-year financial statement and how much or why it has differed from the initial plans is equally as important. Broadly speaking, a Citizen’s budget should be aim at: • guaranteeing the right of citizens to have access to detailed information on government's activities as they are the main contributors • improving communication through the implementation of actions which are more visible and closer to citizens in order to increase general consent on future government policies; • raising a clear perception of the services offered and though which expenditure • managing realistic expectations among citizens in how public money are used. • preventing media communications crisis due to misunderstanding in the data interpretation • enhancing accountability. Citizens’ budget, in order to be successful, needs of course to be integrated into a larger governance agenda, and should involve the cooperation with civil society, good governance and rule of law which have been proved to be increasingly critical elements in guaranteeing transparency. 10
  • 11. In most cases the Citizens’ Budget is the result of a joint work among: • the Directorate in charge of the overall Budget preparation and monitoring (such as the General Directorate of Public Accounts) • the IT Department, in charge of implementing the IT system for data inclusion and storage • the Press Office/Communication office, for the preparation of the tools and events in order to make the public at large aware of the budget. Main elements of a Citizens’ Budget Citizens’ Budget should thus include the following main principles: Clarity of roles and responsibilities: a clear explanation of the structure and functions of the government, of the responsibilities within government, and of the relations between government and the rest of the economy should be provided in order to better understand the mechanisms which lay behind the budget structure; Open budget processes: some information about how a budget is prepared, executed, and monitored is also essential; Public availability of information: specification of the coverage, detail, and timing of fiscal information should also be provided to the public; Assurance of integrity: a description of how the quality of fiscal data is guaranteed. Although there is no agreement on the definition, purposes and contents of a Citizens’ Budget, these are some of the common features in most countries: Highlighting the budget priorities Presenting a broad introduction to the key components of the budget Examples on how the budget will impact ordinary citizens and significant new measures Fiscal balance over medium term horizon Promoting transparency and access to budget information also by other means (mentioned in the Citizens’ Budget) The Citizens’ Budget should present what is the estimated / actual revenue and what is estimated / actual expenditure: by function (or sector); by purpose (or objective o program) by administrative unit; by economic category (e.g. wages and salaries, interest, capital expenditures) by geographical location by financing source and where applicable: by major programme by funding line 11
  • 12. The following is an example check-list of information which are of interest for the citizens Check-List of information to be provided to citizens Determining the information the citizen want is a main step to prepare a good citizens’ budget As regards income the following questions should be addressed: How much of the government’s activities does the budget cover? Which is the profile of the different tax-payers? (how many different types of taxes? which kind of taxes?) Are there any external financial sources (international donors; EU)? How much is being borrowed and from whom? As regards expenditure the following questions should be addressed: For what and with which aims are expenditures made? (functional classification) What is being “bought” with public expenditure: salaries, goods and services, investments? (economic classification) who is responsible within Public Administration of the expenditure management? (administrative classification) Who are the beneficiaries? Families, companies, other public administrations? Which is the difference between planning and final expenditure? How much time is needed to implement a public investment project? How much does it cost the expenses management? (salaries, purchase of goods or services to make the system work) Which are the tools which allow the public expenditure? Which kind of projects were funded in a specific area? (district, municipality, region) Which are the main sectors and for which reason Additional information to be provided could also regard: the different types of accounts or funds, and what agencies are inside or outside the budget; data on the government’s extra-budgetary activities, and their impact on consolidated government accounts a summary and an explanation of the “quasi-fiscal activities” transfers between different levels of government 12
  • 13. Remember also: to include references and links to more detailed spending information to demonstrate realism of the budgeted levels of revenues, expenditures and the fiscal balance by comparing with recent trends to evaluate expected out-turn for the current year in comparison to its forecast in the previous budget to list key fiscal risks: Citizens’ Budget style and format The Citizens’ Budget is deliberately produced for citizens and explains how the government collects, distributes and uses public resources. The best format should be a stand-alone technical document, ideally produced by Ministry of Finance, written in simple language with limited use of jargon and of abbreviations. The document should also: highlight simple and attractive charts and diagrams be short but provided with lots of links contain maps on expenditure allocation to sub-national / local governments use simple per-capita indicators for significant revenue and expenditure aggregates, in addition to the total figures , and present main figures as percentage of GDP include a budget / public accounts terminology glossary Box 4: Suggestions for adopting a clear language Particular attention must also be devoted to the language used when explaining the budget to the citizens. In this context the following useful material can be the consulted. 1. “how to write clearly” published by the European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/translation/writing/clear_writing/how_to_write_clearly_en.pdf 2. “Style guide” published by the Economist: http://www.economist.com/styleguide/introduction Citizens’ Budget dissemination The Citizens’ Budget should be actively disseminated. It is suggested to arrange launches in occasion of public seminars, conferences and in occasion of Public Administration Fairs both at national and at international level. it should also be encouraged the NGOs 13
  • 14. participation, to publicize its availability on the web. Copies should be made available in hard copy and electronic form, but also alternative formats can be considered such as: Video clips Radio podcasts Poster Pamphlets Additional educational materials could be prepared to be disseminated in schools, so that teachers, together with their students use it as an educational subject. Awards could be published in schools were teachers and student will be asked to explain the budget to the general Public. The best budget representation could be used as a standard format for the publication of the Citizens’ Budget. In case of multi-ethnic communities the use of multiple languages should be considered, together with its availability in formats and tools which take into consideration the disadvantaged groups. Finally, the Citizens’ Budget, once published, should be actively promoted through an adequate media campaign. Box 5: Typical tools for a media campaigning Press release: a news release, press release or press statement is a written or recorded communication directed at members of the news media for the purpose of announcing something claimed as having news value. The publication of the citizens’ budget is a good opportunity to send a press release in order to attract media attention on the issue. Typically, it is mailed, faxed, or e-mailed to assignment editors at newspapers, magazines, radio stations, television stations, and/or television networks. The press release should follow an inverted pyramid style, with information appearing in its order of importance so that editors can easily identify key facts Press conferences: they allow the officials to present the budget and to explain its logic. They are organised to inform the public at large. The press conference is a media event in which newsmakers invite journalists to hear them speak and, most often, ask questions. There are two major reasons for holding a news conference. One is that a newsmaker, who gets many questions from reporters, can answer them all at once rather than answering dozens of phone calls. Another is so someone can try to attract news coverage for something that was not of interest to journalists before. Media training sessions: they can be used to train journalists about the most technical terminology related to the budget presentation. It frequently happens that news on media are wrong because the exact terminology and the details of public expenditure are not understood. Journalists awards: they can be established to build capacity among journalists working on economic issues. The annual awards honour the work and contributions of journalists actively engaged in the responsible dissemination of knowledge related to budget issues, and other areas that support long-term policies in this sector. Journalists’ awards can be complemented by a short training course to provide finalists with an opportunity to discuss and debate citizens’ budget issues and their impacts on the wider public. Journalists can be awarded or for the biggest amount of articles written on the magazines/newspapers, or for the best quality articles published on the media. 14
  • 15. Examples of Citizens’ Budgets at national and local level Canada’s Citizen Budget: an interactive customizable budget simulator http://citizenbudget.com/ New Zealand Key facts for taxpayers (e.g., 2011) http://www.treasury.govt.nz/budget/2011/taxpayers/b11-taxpayers.pdf Italy’s “Bilancio in Rete” (Budget on the Internet) http://www.rgs.mef.gov.it/VERSIONE-I/Bilancio-d/Bilancio-i/ France’s Budget and Cyber Budget simulator http://www.performance-publique.budget.gouv.fr/le-budget-et-les-comptes-de-letat/le-budget-de- letat.html http://www.cyber-budget.fr/ Nigerian Budget made simple http://yourbudgit.com/ , http://budgetoffice.gov.ng/ Guatemala’s Citizen Budget www.minfin.gob.gt The city of Cologne’s participatory budget experience http://www.epractice.eu/en/cases/colognepb Local Budgeting in Oregon http://www.oregon.gov/DOR/PTD/docs/local-b/504-400.pdf?ga=t 15
  • 16. 2.4 New challenges for fiscal transparency: open government data The Internet is one of the most striking features affecting today’s societal organization. Among many other aspects, it allows a quicker and cheaper way to distribute information and data. Today, most people would agree that the new standard of public transparency is measured by the amount, significance and re-usability of data released on the web. Data on revenues and expenditures should be easily accessible, digital, re- useable from a technical and legal point of view, machine readable, ……. === open data The idea is that with “open data” the public can sort, search, and transform the information to meet their needs and answer detailed questions, such as: • how much of my tax money is spent on cancer research? • how much public money is spent for schools in my region? • how much revenue is raised by taxing fuel? Open Government Data is raw information collected or produced by public administrations that is shared with the public digitally, over the Internet, in a way that promotes analysis and reuse. The notion of open government data has been around for some years. Since 2009, governments are making important pronouncements on the principles for transparency in government and on the value of making public data widely accessible for practical applications in and out of civic life and are launching “open data portals”. A data portal as a single point of access to documents available for re-use – that is downloading, searching, analyzing and re-elaborating - such as http://data.gov.uk/ in the United Kindgom, http://data.gouv.fr in France, http://data.gov.it in Italy, http://data.soumi.fi in Finland and many others. While e-Government explores how governments can best exploit ICT to embed good governance principles and achieve public policy goals, open data concentrates on the availability and accessibility of data, and on idea that third parties may provide services with such data as well. 16
  • 17. Box 6: The definition of “openness” Supposedly, open data should be released in a machine-processable format and with no patent licensing restrictions, so that the public can sort, search, and transform the information to meet their needs. Different definitions emphasize different features of “openness”. A comprehensive overview is provided by http://opendefinition.org/okd/ which lists the following features: 1. Access Available as a whole and at a reasonable reproduction cost, preferably downloading via the Internet without charge. The work must be available in a convenient and modifiable form. 2. Redistribution The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the work either on its own or as part of a package made from derived work. License without royalty or other fee. 3. Reuse The license must allow for modifications and must allow them to be distributed under the terms of the original work. 4. Absence of Technological Restriction The work must be provided in such a form that there are no technological obstacles to the performance of the above activities (eg. open data format) 5. Attribution The license may require the attribution of the contributors and creators to the work. 6. Integrity The license may require as a condition for the work being distributed in modified form that the resulting work carry a different name or version number from the original work. 7. No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups The license must not discriminate against any person or group of persons. 8. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor The license must not restrict anyone from use the work in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the work from being used in a business, or for genetic research 9. Distribution of License The rights attached to the work must apply to all to whom the program is redistributed without the need for execution of an additional license by those parties. 10. License Must Not Be Specific to a Package The rights attached to the work must not depend on the work being part of a particular package. If the work is extracted from that package, all parties redistributed should have the same rights as the original package. 11. License Must Not Restrict the Distribution of other Works The license must not place restrictions on other works that are distributed along with the licensed work. For example, the license must not insist that all other works distributed on the same medium are open. Open data does not mean data identifying or that provides ways to identify individuals, unless that information is already published. 17
  • 18. Public expenditure data are a prime element of open data initiatives and the open data concept can, in turn, offer a very interesting platform to disseminate information of public revenues and expenditures, and on all other aspects of public finance. The main aspect is the possibility to provide a detailed account by publishing raw data in addition to aggregates. In fact many recent EU initiatives, such as the “European Transparency Initiative (ETI)” launched by the European Commission in 2005, aim at raising awareness of the use made of EU money to explain better what Europe does and why it matters.A consultation, opened on 3 May and closed on 31 August 2006, was promoted by the European Commission was based on a series of questions related to EU funds beneficiaries (http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/kallas/transparency_en.htm). The main result of this process was the adoption of the revised Financial Regulation (December 13, 2006) in which the EU committed itself to full transparency about who receives monies from the EU budget. Examples of the publication of data on Beneficiaries of EU Funds The disclosure of data about the recipients of various EU funds managed by the European Commission in partnership with Member States, notably the Structural Funds and Common Agricultural Policy, for which specific transparency requirements hold. The web pages provide a catalogue of where to find the information for all Member countries. The information is very detailed, but is not necessarily published as open data. Web page on Beneficiaries of Grants http://ec.europa.eu/grants/beneficiaries_en.htm Web page on Beneficiaries of Public Contracts http://ec.europa.eu/public_contracts/beneficiaries_en.htm Web page on Beneficiaries of Common Agricultural Policy payments http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/funding/index2_en.htm From a normative point of view, much of the debate on open data today in the EU revolves around the ongoing revision process of Directive 2003/98 for the re-use Public Sector Information http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/index_en.htm (see Box 7). 18
  • 19. Box 7: EU Directive 2003/98 for the re-use Public Sector Information The main objective of the Directive is to establish “a minimum set of rules governing the re- use and the practical means of facilitating re-use of existing documents held by public sector bodies of the Member States”: • -re-use of documents for commercial or non-commercial purposes where the re-use of documents held by public sector bodies is allowed • -requirements for documents to be made available through electronic means • -transparency on conditions and charge is granted (and must be non-discriminatory for similar categories of re-use) • -prohibition of exclusive arrangements to grant exclusive rights on documents. The directive covers written texts but also e.g. databases, maps, audio files and films. A revision of the Directive is in course and expected by end of 2012. Issues under discussion: • General rule that all documents held by public sector bodies will be re- usable for both commercial and non-commercial purposes, unless covered by the exceptions provided for in the Directive • including new bodies in the scope of application of the Directive such as libraries (including university libraries), museums and archives; • limiting the fees that can be charged by the public authorities at the marginal costs as a rule; • introducing independent oversight over re-use rules in the Member States; • making machine-readable formats for information held by public authorities the norm. As part of the Digital Agenda for Europe1, in addition to adapting the legal framework for data re-usethe EC Commission is also: • Mobilizing financial resources in favor of open data and support the development of European data portals • Facilitate coordination and experience sharing between European countries, in particular through: • the PSI group, a Member States’ expert group exchanging good practices • the PSI platform a web portal which provides news on good practices, new products and services, and legal cases concerning PSI re-use, • the LAPSI network, the European network for policy discussions and strategic action on legal issues related to the access and the re-use of PSI • the ISA (Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrations) for semantic interoperability to address the need of efficient public services in EU by facilitating electronic collaboration between public administrations. 19
  • 20. Some benefits of open data inside and outside the public administration Broadly speaking, there are numerous benefits of open data the public administration as well as for users. Experience up to now suggests the following: Accountability: the expectation is that modern, democratic government shares information with the society it governs to demonstrate freedom from corruption and appropriate use of public funds. Efficiency improvements within the administration: public reporting of costs and comparative outcomes can be a driver of efficiency. Internal collection and monitoring of management information is critical for driving efficiency improvements, and for making informed strategic decisions. Service performance: at present, where data is not open outside government, it may often not be available inside government as well. Public sector bodies are not easily able to benchmark their costs and the quality of their services against their peers and may have falsely high – or low – understanding of their performance. In some cases, peer- based competition is sharpened by public scrutiny. Data Quality: knowing that the data are released to the public improves their quality, and because the data owners pay more attention to the processes of data management and end users can find any errors. Data exchange: Open Data released by Public Bodies can be directly used by other Public Administrations, replacing costly dedicated processes; Linked Open Data can be used to share content definition, following the Semantic Web metaphor. Innovation in public services: Open Data presents opportunities for public service transformation by giving users more power to self-serve. New markets: A new market for public service information can develop if data is freely available in a standardized format for use and re-use, particularly in the life sciences; population data mining and risk profiling; consumer technologies; and media sectors. “Open” public finance data Il must be kept in mind that the release of “raw” data is very significant in itself and it provides an opportunity for many interested parties to understand public finances and answer specific and significant questions on revenue and expenditures. However, it does not by itself make the government's finances necessarily more “scrutable” and understandable. Indeed, raw accounting data usually contains “messy” information, many alphanumerical and often requires detailed knowledge of variable definitions and encoding schemes. Moreover, data files are often too large to load into widely available analysis tools (such as Microsoft Excel, which is a common tool-of-choice for many “simple” data investigators). This means that “open data” on public finance cannot substitute aggregate views and (more or less flexible) summary tables presenting the main features. 20
  • 21. The following are examples of some already existing good practices on the disclosure of detailed data on public accounts or specific areas of public spending at Government level. Examples of Government initiatives: US Recovery Act allows tracking single recipients and projects of the Recovery Funds. http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/default.aspx UK COINS - the Combined On-line Information System used by the UK Treasury to collect financial data from across the public sector to support fiscal management, the production of Parliamentary supply estimates and public expenditure statistics. Up to eleven years of data can be actively maintained in the system - five historic (or outturn) years, the current year and up to five future (or plan) years. http://hm-treasury.gov.uk/psr_coins_faqs.htm, http://hm-treasury.gov.uk/psr_coins_data.htm, http://issuu.com/hmtreasury/docs/coins_coding_presentation_july_10 UK Public spending & reporting transparency monthly-updated list of all financial transactions spending over £25,000 from single Departments http://hm-treasury.gov.uk/psr_transparency_index.htm Italy’s end-of-year financial statement at budget item level (year by year) Example: http://dwrgsweb-lb.rgs.mef.gov.it/DWRGSXL/cons.do (Budget Law and Mid-Year variations available in the same format at budget item level from http://www.rgs.mef.gov.it/VERSIONE-I/Bilancio-d/Bilancio-i/ ) 21
  • 22. EXAMPLE: THE US RECOVERY.GOV To achieve its transparency goal, the “American Recovery and Reinvestment Act” of 2009 requires recipients of “recovery” funds to report every January, April, July, and October on how they are using the money. All the data is made available on the Recovery.gov website so the public can track the Recovery funds. The Recovery Act provides $787 billion, increased to $840 billion in 2012, for tax cuts and benefits for millions of working families and businesses; entitlement programs (such as unemployment benefits); federal contracts, grants and loans. The vast majority of the recipients fall into one of four categories: State/local governments, Universities and other research institutions, Non-profit organizations, Private companies. The website provides several examples on how to make the information easily accessible and interesting for the public. In particular, the recipient of funds can be tracked on a Map and information can be searched in many ways: • projects can be found at specific locations (through the names of a State, congressional district, or postal code) or by topic (e.g., "university," "energy," "transportation"). • recipients name or by topic • projects can be found by status: not yet started, in progress, or completed Screenshots from the website are shown in the following pages. See: http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/default.aspx 22
  • 23. 23
  • 24. 24
  • 25. 25
  • 26. The following are examples of some already existing good practices of gathering and re- using data on public expenditure at civil society level. Examples of Civil society initiatives: UK Where does my money go http://wheredoesmymoneygo.org/ UK Guardian Department expenditure over 25 thousand pounds http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/interactive/2010/nov/19/government-data-interactive-guide EU Farm Subsidies. Its aim is to obtain detailed data on who gets what from the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP http://farmsubsidy.org/ EU Fish Subsidies Subsidies paid to owners of fishing vessels and others working in the fishing industry under the European Union’s Common Fisheries Policy http://www.fishsubsidy.org/ UK Local Council Spending http://openlylocal.com/councils/spending Italy Chamber of Deputies expenditures LinkedOpenCamera 26
  • 27. EXAMPLE: FISHSUBSIDY.ORG BY EU TRANSPARENCY See: http://www.fishsubsidy.org/ 27
  • 28. 3. Technological solutions The efforts to produce a more friendly approach to data dissemination and to increase citizens participation is helped by technical solutions that are described in this chapter. Initially, in the box below a short description of current IT system situation in GDPA, and consequently it introduces a data dissemination system proposal with several paragraph on technical tools today available on the market. Box 8: The current system in the Turkish Ministry of Finance Technologies in GDPA Department can be considered a point of strength in Ministry of Finance’s organization. Say 2000i is the result of GDPA’s competence in the domain of accounting ready to develop software applications at service of various functionalities of GDPA offices. Say 2000i is the name of a centralized system based on Oracle technology platform and web base applications that connects 4839 accounting units at the Local government level required according to Law n. 5018 to provide data on their revenue and expenses. The users distributed on Turkish territory are able to connect to the system, using a dedicated portal on off site for uploading the financial figures monthly. That users own a password to get access to KBS, a dedicated system inclusive in Say 2000i, dedicated to the accounting and financial review operations. Some of LGs process data on own local accounting system are monthly. In this context, data dissemination procedures have the main data sources in Say2000i data stores, which represents the main data provider. Data collection from territory (Local Government’s accounting notes) and applications management are centralized in a data centre where the software applications running on Say 2000i base platform are managed by 12 application servers with Linux operative system and separate storage area for internal and external reporting purposes, based on Oracle. Table 1: Data collection for Central and Local Government CG LG System used Say 2000i KBS Portal1 Accounting Data are inserted Accounting Data, inserted in a xls directly in Say2000i System which file, are uploaded after automatic Data input performs automatically all control processes activated controls 28
  • 29. 3.1 System architecture for data dissemination at GDPA Currently, internal end users can ask for specific queries to be developed, but at present they cannot directly retrieve data. There are no tools to make direct queries, except for the Oracle tools used by IT staff. Therefore the creation of a proper datawarehouse, separated from the operational database, with query functions available to both internal and external end users would be the best ITC solution. The data dissemination proceedings need to improve the current IT System through its own greater specialization by implementing a distinct date base upload by Say2000i data store where is possible to adopt statistical procedures as data cleaning, filtering, missing value, and transformation in time series format. The adoption of a system ad-hoc realize a easier optimization of methodological process for statistical data publication tools. Fig. 1. Data upload from centralized storage The technological solutions proposed would be through the following: make independent OLTP System and OLAP System, with obvious advantages as speed up computing time, segregation of hardware and software resources, distinction of transaction and computing, etc.; have dedicated hardware and software resources for Statistical Control task; 29
  • 30. Among the major findings found out with the staff members of IT department, is the rapid development towards an OLAP, online analytical processing structure and the upgrade of hardware technologies to Oracle database machine. The proposal guidelines for creating a Dissemination System are based on dedicated platform with a operational data base alimented by the accounting system storage, a staging area where data are computed and refined by statistical tools transforming financial figures (data registration status) to Statistical data ready for publishing (validation status). Currently, external end users may only access the financial statistical reports while the following proposal includes a proper data warehouse, separated from the operational database, with query functions available to both internal and external end users. The objective is to provide a external utilization of statistical data to citizens by creating a dedicated web site where it is possible to log on with direct access to the data warehouse performing queries and data extraction. Fig. 2. – Data dissemination System A dedicated IT platform with an operational database for computing statistical controls, and eventually to run software applications or statistical tools, will be achieved through the following major design steps: 1. Creation of ad-hoc operational DB, designed in line with the functional requirements indicated by accounting system specifications and function points; 2. Migration of financial data available from accounting system; 30
  • 31. 3. Determination of computing staging area (from accounting data registration to statistical validation) 4. Integration of financial data, with other information assuring an interoperability of data sources; 5. Migration from Operation DB to data warehousing for Web data publication; 6. Determination of row data level of data accessibility for users profile; 7. Logging of users access for control purposes; The proposal system architecture can be represented in the following information model where the operational data will be migrated in a dedicated system for data dissemination where data are normalized, cleansed and integrated on a operational db passing through several staging areas of “statistical data production”. In the final stage, the statistical data will me migrated in a DW where data are accessible to external end users (citizen and professional users) via web portal. On other side, internal end users need to provide the already scheduled publications and in addition a data aggregation by accounting rules, dividing data production in classes for scope of data quality control and verification of consolidated budget. Fig. 3 - Logical architecture and information model 31
  • 32. The data dissemination system as designed in the information model above represents a IT solution characterized by some points of strength: • drive down the cost of developing new specific queries, on demand, reducing budgetary expense; • to raise the level of application services; • to enhance the overall control on data dissemination activities; • speed of data access; • improve accuracy of data; • data integration. About IT Audit and services maintenance procedures, it is necessary to highlight that ITC department at GDPA has approached the formalization of procedures in line with Control Objective Standards (COBIT), a standard de facto in IT audit. Consequently, future applications running in the area of data dissemination and publications, need to follow the procedures established by this standard in order to define a new group of functions for the specific area “Statistical reporting of financial figures”. The creation of specialized web portal dedicated to data diffusion should include tools for improving citizens’ understanding of statistical information including data visualization tools and Geographical Information Systems (GIS). 3.2 Geographical Information System (GIS) Data representation on geographical maps is considered the best solution for better explaining to people the activities made from Central and Local Government in the territory. Geographic information system is a system designed to capture, store, manipulate, analyze, manage, and present all types of geographical data. The acronym GIS is sometimes used for geographical information science and represents the merging of cartography, statistical analysis, and database technology. A GIS can be thought of as a system—it digitally creates and "manipulates" spatial areas that may be jurisdictional, purpose, or application-oriented. A GIS developed for an application, jurisdiction, or purpose may not be necessarily interoperable or compatible with other systems and it is based on a spatial data infrastructure (SDI), a concept that has no such restrictive boundaries. In a general sense, the term describes any information system that integrates, stores, edits, analyzes, shares, and displays geographic information for informing the users. It needs of data repository central to computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) as a part of dissemination system asset and analytical software systems. GIS applications are tools that allow users to create interactive queries (user-created searches), analyze spatial information, edit data in maps, and present the results of all these operations. 32
  • 33. Nevertheless the financial figures and budget execution data belonging to GDPA’s data store need of classification for typology of expenditure (infrastructure, education, healthy, cohesion, agriculture, etc) and these groups of financial expenditure may be applied with statistical information from territory as density of population, medium age of population, university and education centers, medium salary,…., and main territory resources improving the users understanding to economical life of Turkish Republic. GIS technologies assure a prompt data visualization of financial data to users in the own territory providing an interactive tool to compare Public Government activities closer to the population interest. This power tool of data visualization fits perfectly for population curiosity while is less useful for budget execution inherent some class of expenditure not linked to the territory. 3.3 Statistical tools for data management Many software tools can be used for managing the data from a statistical point of view. Here we suggest just few examples of tools widely used. These tools could be introduced to support operation in different steps of the process: from data cleaning, to “big data” management, to complex statistical elaborations. Today many of these tools are open source. Here are some examples. Google Refine (see: http://code.google.com/p/google-refine/) is a power tool for working with messy data, cleaning it up, transforming it from one format into another, extending it with web services. Google Refine is a standalone desktop application for data cleanup and transformation to other formats. Its interface is similar to spreadsheet applications (and can work with spreadsheet file formats), however acts more like database. It operates on rows of data which have cells under columns, which is very similar to relational database tables. One Refine project is one table. User can filter rows to display defining filtering criteria (for example, showing rows where given column is not empty). Unlike spreadsheets, most operations in Refine are done on all visible rows: transformation of all cells in all rows under one column, creation of new column based on existing column data, etc. All actions that were done on dataset are stored in project and can be replayed on another dataset. Unlike spreadsheets, no formulas are stored in cells, but formulas are used to transform data, and transformation is done only once. Program has web user interface, however it is not hosted by software developer, but available for download and use on local machine. When starting Refine, it starts web server and starts browser to open web UI powered by this webserver. Another tool from Google is Google BigQuery https://developers.google.com/bigquery/) , a web service that lets you do interactive analysis of massive datasets—up to billions of rows. Scalable and easy to use, BigQuery lets developers and businesses tap into powerful data analytics on demand. 33
  • 34. Google BigQuery Service allows you to run SQL-like queries against very large datasets, with potentially billions of rows. This can be your own data, or data that someone else has shared for you. BigQuery works best for interactive analysis of very large datasets, typically using a small number of very large, append-only tables. While Google Refine is a free product you can download, Google BigQuery is a service with a pay-per-use policy based on query processing and storage used. The need for complex statistical operations on data requires the use of a statistical tool. “R” (http://www.r-project.org/) has been receiving a lot of attention recently, although it’s been around for over 15 years. R is an open-source language for statistical computing and data visualization, supporting data manipulation and transformations, as well as sophisticated graphical displays. Corporate data analysts and statisticians often know R and use it in their daily work, either writing their own R functionality, or leveraging the more than 3400 open source packages. The Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN http://cran.r-project.org/) supports a wide range of statistical and data analysis capabilities. R is a statistics language similar to SAS or SPSS. It’s a powerful, extensible environment, and as noted above, it has a wide range of statistics and data visualization capabilities. It’s easy to install and use, and it’s free. To expand R features, recently Oracle corporation released “Oracle R Enterprise” (https://blogs.oracle.com/R/tags/oracle_r_enterprise) that lifts memory and computational constraint found in R today by executing requested R calculations on data in the database. Oracle R Enterprise allows users to further leverage Oracle's engineered systems, like Exadata, already used in Turkish MoF, for enterprise- wide analytics. 3.4 Data Warehouse Data Warehouse technology is one of the techniques usually included in “Business Intelligence” techniques. It provides to users data coming from a cleaned, transformed Data Base designed for data analysis. Using Data Warehouses (DW) users can select data, combine them and generate “new” outputs” like tabulations and graphs. DW software is essential to enable users to analyze data in custom mode, then download the final results in the desired format. Many examples of DW are available, some DW tools are developed as an extension of traditional DBMSs, others are products specifically designed for Business Intelligence. Both proprietary and open-source products software are available. DW could improve the ability for Turkish users to analyze data and create new relationships. Here a short list of Business Intelligence opensource tools: Pentaho (http://www.pentaho.com/), Jasper (http://www.jaspersoft.com/) and Palo (http://www.palo.net/). Some of them are supported by Turkish companies such as GNA (http://en.gna.com.tr/). Here our suggestion to introduce Data Warehouse tool: – start analyzing Data Warehouse tools market – compare tools characteristics with GDPA requirements 34
  • 35. – test the best two tools, possibly one proprietary and one open-source – choose the tool that best meets the requirements of Ministry and external users – start releasing a selection of data on a simple DW in which users can process, manipulate, download data. 3.5 Data Visualization More and more statistical organizations are using new methods to present statistical data, starting from Maps and Advanced Graphic Method (Hans Rosling is considered the father of New Visualization age - http://www.gapminder.org/) and including charts, Mindmaps, and display of news, data, connections, websites, articles and resources. One of the often used tools are “dashboard” a data visualization tool that displays the current status of metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) for an enterprise. Dashboards consolidate and arrange numbers, metrics and sometimes performance scorecards on a single screen. Dashboards can often be obtained using Data Warehouse tools quoted in previous paragraph. A simple way to start presenting data using advanced visualization techniques is Google Public Data Explorer (http://www.google.com/publicdata/home) , a tool by which every organization can show his data on the Web so that users can find, explore, and share it. We suggest two steps for using GPDE: 1. first Ministry of Finance can start testing the tool uploading datasets for visualization and exploration by privileged users; 2. in a second phase MoF can agree with Google for a formal insertion of his data in the Dataset Directory http://www.google.com/publicdata/directory. Many organizations have chosen this way of publishing (often as additional way to their website), between them WorldBank, IMF, OECD, Eurostat etc. VIDI is another suite that can be used to display data in new ways. VIDI is a set of Drupal (an open CMS) modules designed to enable the creation of visual data displays. Using VIDI tools you can display changes in data values over time, relate data in various ways to geographical maps, or display static datasets through different types of charts. Two ways to use it: 1. use VIDI on the website http://www.dataviz.org loading your data, choosing between available visualizations and storing there your visualization; 2. download VIDI modules and install them in your Drupal website, then import your datasets and prepare data displays. Another website offering advanced methods of visualization for statistical data is IBM ManyEyes (http://www-958.ibm.com/software/data/cognos/manyeyes/); the service is offered by IBM and the site is really easy to use: 35
  • 36. • Upload a data set • Choose a visualization type: besides the usual bubble charts, scatter plots, bar charts, you find also word-clouds (tag-clouds), treemaps, network diagrams • Discover • Share with others Any kind of data set you upload is visible for the community: a nice way to share discoveries, find cool stuff and start meaningful discussions. Talking about new visualizations, we must quote the “Infographics”, graphic visual representations of information, data or knowledge. Good examples of Infographics can be found at http://www.coolinfographics.com/ and http://www.good.is/infographics . Other websites dedicated to visualization tools and methods: http://datavisualization.ch/tools/, http://visual.ly/. Many visualization techniques are also available in modules of tools presented above in 3.2 and 3.3 paragraphs. 36
  • 37. Examples of Advanced Visualizations mentioned in the text First of all an example of Dashboard, in which many different graphics are collected to give the user an overview, a glance of the situation. Then we introduce a page from the World Bank website, one of the best-practice for data presentation: in this page you can see a sort of Statistical Dashboard 37
  • 38. examples 9 (continued) Here a chart obtained from Google Public Data Explorer, a free service in which many national and international organizations store their data so that users can process them also in graphical ways Finally an example from Gapminder, a graph with moving bubble-chart to show the trends over the past two centuries of economic and health indicators 38
  • 39. 3.6 Open Data tools Open data are data freely available to everyone to use and republish as they wish, without restrictions from copyright, patents or other mechanisms of control. Open data are often available in open formats as “raw data”, meaning that researcher and stakeholders can make their own processing and analysis on them. More and more Open Data are now released as Linked Open Data (http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html). A first software platform available to manage Open Data is CKAN (Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network - http://ckan.org/). Developed by OKFN (Open Knowledge Foundation Network), a community promoting open knowledge and access because these principles have the potential to deliver far-reaching societal benefits. ‘Open knowledge’ according to OKFN is any content, information or data that people are free to use, re-use and redistribute — without any legal, technological or social restriction. It's an open source package that make data accessible – by providing tools to streamline publishing, sharing, finding and using data. CKAN is aimed at data publishers (national and regional governments, companies and organizations) wanting to make their data open and available Used by many central (dk, no, uk) and local governments, its main features are: • Publish & Find Datasets (import, keywords, versioning) • Store & Manage Data (Raw data, metadata, statistics, geo-) • Engage with users & Others (Community Mgmt) • Customize & Extend (APIs, extensions, opensource) The World Bank website is an high-level web site that implements many of listed suggestions and could be used as “best practices” example: http://www.worldbank.org/. In their website http://data.worldbank.org/ you can find data by country or by topic or by more than 1.000 indicators . All indicators available in table, map, graph and down- loadable in xls and xml format. On the World Bank website there are also modules to directly access WB data from Stata and “R” statistical tools. 39
  • 40. Box 9: DRUPAL The increasing size of data managed by websites and mew ways of data dissemination can be well managed only using a Content Management System (CMS). CMSs support the creation, management, distribution, publishing, and discovery of corporate information, covering the complete life-cycle of the site pages, providing simple tools to create the contents, to publish and finally to archive them. The main advantages of using CMS is the separation between content management and technical management of the site and the availability of numerous tools to improve the presentation of the site and simplify the management. Many CMS are available for free and open source; between them Drupal(1) gives many functions that simplify the data management and visualization (modules Data, Data Cube and Linked Data and others1) and therefore it's used in big projects of data dissemination like DataGov, DataGov.uk and World Bank (1). A list of Turkish government (central and local) websites managed by Drupal can be found at http://groups.drupal.org/node/19885#Turkey . Drupal with version 7 introduces the use of RDFa. RDFa (or Resource Description Framework – in – attributes) is a W3C Recommendation1 that adds a set of extensions to XHTML for embedding rich metadata within Web documents, by enriching the existing human-readable data with RDF attributes. RDFa then enables us to bridge the gap between what humans see when viewing a document and what machines "see" when they process the same document. RDFa data can be queried using SPARQL language, another W3C standard. The presence of these standard technologies used in Semantic Web is another reason why Drupal is widely used for OpenData websites. Starting from 2011 there is an effort shared between United States and India: “Data.gov-in-a- Box”, an open source version of the United States’ Data.gov data portal (based on Drupal) and India’s India.gov.in document portal. The U.S. and India are working together to produce an open source version available for implementation by countries globally, encouraging governments around the world to stand up open data sites that promote transparency, improve citizen engagement, and engage application developers in continuously improving these efforts. The new project is called Open Government Platform1 (OGPL). The first module released is the Data Management System, which provides the tools and capabilities for publishing data in the Open Government Platform, an open source product designed to facilitate governments around the world to stand up their own open government data sites. 3.7 Interoperability to data The formalization of data format is a crucial point to assure data exchange and interoperability between Institutions and Ministries also in view of e-government projects which require a more general approach to data analysis and decision making support. Best practices in Europe are represented by SDMX format, which assures data exchange among others between European Central Bank and National Central Banks and IMF. 40
  • 41. The advantage of having standard data formats that share a common Information model (SDMX) is that all of these types of exchange can take place side-by-side, and the applications may process metadata assuring interoperability. The interoperability to data is assured in the following operative steps: a. Business alignment in SDMX framework i. From tables to SDMX format ready to be transmitted via gateway b. System architecture i. Technology independent specification of an SDMX information model c. Data modelling i. Automated mapping of information model A. Business alignment in SDMX framework. An example of transformation from a table of monetary and banking statistics to metadata SDMX format (to perform data exchange to IMF) is the following: 41
  • 42. B. System architecture. An example of architecture for data exchange between two entities is the following: C. Data modelling The content of a generic interchange message for statistical metadata could be represented in the following items: • Interchange administration segments • Message administration segments • Code lists • Statistical concepts • Key families • Data set administration segments 42
  • 43. Array structure • Data segment(s) • Attributes • End of message administration • End of interchange administration The information model representation in UML (Unified Modelling Language) 43
  • 44. 4. Public understanding and involvement 4.1 Public consultations The easiest way to prepare for data dissemination to the public – being the specific purpose the setup of a Citizens’ Budget or the release of detailed / raw data on public finance operations - would be in foreseeing a fully public involvement since its planning. That would imply, from the government side, the organization of consultation with civil society groups and periodical public polls during which citizens are asked to express their wishes about what data they are interested in. In this context, civil society organizations play an important role as facilitators of a broad policy dialogue. For this reason, it is important to involve these organizations in the consultation processes. Being the budget an issue, which affects many sectors of the society, it should be particularly encouraged a coherent approach to representation of civil society organizations at all level. A consultation relationship between the Government and interested parties should be underpinned by certain fundamental principles. These principles define the environment within which they will both operate. They also constitute the basis for any future developments in the area of consultation policy. The principles should include the following principles: Participation: to ensure wide participation throughout the policy chain from conception to implementation Openness and accountability: The policy-making process must be visible to the outside world if it must be understood and have credibility. Thus consultation processes have to be transparent, both to those who are directly involved and to the general public. It must be clear: what issues are being developed what mechanisms are being used to consult who is being consulted and why what has influenced decisions in the formulation of policy. It follows that interested parties must themselves operate in an environment that is transparent, so that the public is aware of the parties involved in the consultation processes and how they conduct themselves. Openness and accountability are thus important principles for the conduct of organizations when they are seeking to contribute to the budget policy development. It must be apparent: which interests they represent how inclusive that representation is. All communications relating to consultation should be clear and concise, and should include all necessary information to facilitate responses. The information in publicity and consultation documents should include: 44
  • 45. A summary of the context, scope and objectives of consultation, including a description of the specific issues open for discussion or questions with particular importance for the Government Details of any hearings, meetings or conferences, where relevant Contact details and deadlines Explanation of the Government's processes for dealing with contributions, what feed-back to expect, and details of the next stages involved in the development of the policy If not enclosed, reference to related documentation The exact time limit for the consultation Finally, the receipt of contributions should be acknowledged. Results of open public consultation should be displayed on websites linked to the single access point on the Internet. Depending on the number of comments received and the resources available, acknowledgement can take the form of: an individual response (by e-mail or acknowledgement slip), or a collective response (by e-mail or on the Government's single access point for consultation on the Internet). Results of other forms of consultation should, as far as possible, also be subject to public scrutiny on the single access point on the Internet. The Government should then provide adequate feedback to responding parties and to the public at large. To this end, explanatory memoranda accompanying the decisions taken following the consultation process should include the results of these consultations and an explanation as to how these were conducted and how the results were taken into account. 4.1 Promoting data use and re-use through websites and competitions An important step for citizen involvement is to encourage them to make use of the data. This is particularly true when it comes to “open data”. A first step is setting up a dedicated website (see Box 10). 45
  • 46. Box 10: Suggestions for a dedicated website The Website should include two main sections: a public page to be accessed by everyone, and an Intranet devoted to specific target groups like the media and other key stakeholders which can be involved by the administration’s staff. The typical focus of the web site may include A description of the data contents and structure of the data files (“meta- data”) The data files (preferably in a comma-separated, tab-separated values or xml formats) Some key documentation, for further information Link to aggregate or summary tables and figures News and Events related to the budget data presentation A devoted newsletter and automatic emailing list A section devoted to Media relations FAQs and Ask-the-Expert Links Contacts Forums to allow the interaction with the citizens The Documentation section should contain all the official documentation related to the budget a kind of specifics related to the budget explanation. The News and Events section should contain information on any major news related to the budget presentation to the public (conferences, press conferences, workshops). The Media section should be devoted to the interaction with journalists. It could be organised as an Intranet provided with some public information. The Intranet should contain press releases and information on initiatives exclusively addressed to journalists. The public section should provide useful links and a glossary of the most commonly used terms that could be of interest also to other Target Groups. The Newsletter section should make newsletters available if foreseen as a communication tool for the data being disseminated and be arranged by publication date, starting from the most recent. It can be available on the website and automatically send to a emailing list. FAQs and Ask-the-Expert section (FAQs) should provide the most common questions and related answers. If the user does not find answers to his/her question in the FAQ list, he/she can access the “Ask-the-Expert” section, where to ask questions through on-line forms. The “Ask-the-Expert” section should be organized as a feedback section, in which general public can pose questions, make comments, and receive answers. The Links section should contain a list of useful links to other relevant websites, both at national, European and international level. The Contact section should provide the names and respective roles of the staffs in charge.. The Website could also be provided with discussion forums in order to collect general public opinions and feelings toward the issue. 46
  • 47. Another very popular way to promote data use is to set up competitions and prizes where citizens and programmers can work together on the data and make it more meaningful. The typical structure of these competitions is that a number of datasets are released and programmers then have a short time-frame - running from a couple of days to to a few weeks - to develop applications using the data. A prize is then awarded to the best application. Competitions have been held in a number of countries including the UK, the US, Norway, Australia, Spain, Denmark, Finland and Italy. Examples of open data competitions Apps for Democracy, one of the first competitions in the United States, launched in October 2008 by Vivek Kundra, at the time Chief Technology Officer (CTO) of the District of Columbia Government http://www.appsfordemocracy.org/ Abre Datos (Open Data) Challenge, first held in Spain in April 2010, where developers where invited to to create open source applications making use of public data in just 48 hours. http://www.abredatos.es/ Nettskap 2.0 launched In April 2010 by the Norwegian Ministry for Government Administration where Norwegian developers – companies, public agencies or individuals – were challenged to come up with web-based project ideas in the areas of service development, efficient work processes, and increased democratic participation http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/fad/kampanjer/nettskap.html?id=635971 Apps4Itlay, a competition open to all EU citizens, associations, developer communities and firms willing to develop innovative applications based on the re-use of Public Sector Information (Open Data) launched in 2011. http://www.appsforitaly.org/ 47
  • 48. These Guidelines were drafted as part of Activity 1.7 of the EU Twining project “Improving Data Quality in Public Accounts”. Resident Twinning Advisor: Mauro Barbini Component responsible: Yusuf Akkoyun The document was prepared by: Aline Pennisi (Ministry of economy and finance - Italy; e-mail: aline.pennisi@tesoro.it) Giuseppe Florio (Ministry of economy and finance -Italy; e-mail: giuseppe.florio@tesoro.it) Claudia Salvi (FormezPA - Italy; e-mail: csalvi@formez.it) Carlo Vaccari (FormezPA / Istat - Italy; email: vaccari@istat.it) 48