Presented in ISTIC-KISTEP S&T Policy Training Program for High Level Policy Makers 2012, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 5-9 November 2012

1. COUNTRY REPORT :
STI Indonesia
Dr. Tatang A. Taufik
Deputy Chairman
Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology (BPPT) - Indonesia
ISTIC-KISTEP S&T Policy Training Program for High Level Policy Makers 2012
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 5-9 November 2012

2. OUTLINE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 COUNTRY BACKGROUND
3.0 POLICY ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (STI)
3.1 COUNTRY’S POLICY ON STI
3.2 STRUCTURE OF COUNTRY’S STI SYSTEM
3.3 FUNDING FOR RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION
3.4 STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT IN FORMULATION OF STI POLICY
4.0 FRAMEWORK OF COUNTRY OR ORGANIZATION POLICY
5.0 PROCESS/ACTIVITIES FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT
6.0 POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
6.1 HOW IT IS IMPLEMENTED AND MONITORED
6.2 CHALLENGES IN POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
7.0 NATIONAL INNOVATION PROGRAMS AND FORESIGHT INITIATIVES
7.1 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN GOVERNMENT
7.2 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVE IN INDUSTRY
8.0 RECOMMENDATION FOR ENHANCEMENT OF COUNTRY/ ORGANIZATION STI POLICY
9.0 CONCLUSION

3. OUTLINE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 COUNTRY BACKGROUND
3.0 POLICY ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (STI)
3.1 COUNTRY’S POLICY ON STI
3.2 STRUCTURE OF COUNTRY’S STI SYSTEM
3.3 FUNDING FOR RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION
3.4 STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT IN FORMULATION OF STI POLICY
4.0 FRAMEWORK OF COUNTRY OR ORGANIZATION POLICY
5.0 PROCESS/ACTIVITIES FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT
6.0 POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
6.1 HOW IT IS IMPLEMENTED AND MONITORED
6.2 CHALLENGES IN POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
7.0 NATIONAL INNOVATION PROGRAMS AND FORESIGHT INITIATIVES
7.1 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN GOVERNMENT
7.2 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVE IN INDUSTRY
8.0 RECOMMENDATION FOR ENHANCEMENT OF COUNTRY/ ORGANIZATION STI POLICY
9.0 CONCLUSION

4. 1.0 INTRODUCTION
• I hold an engineer degree in Industrial Engineering from
Bandung Institute of Technology – Indonesia. I obtained a
Master Degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering, and
Ph.D. in Resource Economics from the University of Florida -
USA.
• I have worked at BPPT since 1986. Prior to the current
position, I was a director at some centers at BPPT.
• I have been involved in introducing and initiating national
and regional innovation system development, industrial
cluster, innovation networks, technopreneurship, regional e-
development and competitiveness, including developing
regional competitiveness councils, and in various science &
technology policy, R&D policy, and innovation policy reform
initiatives in Indonesia.
• I was an author and co-author, and editor/co-editor of
several books, proceedings, and papers related to the
aforementioned topics.
Dr. Tatang A. Taufik
Deputy Chairman,
Agency for the Assessment
and Application of
Technology (BPPT) -
Indonesia

5. OUTLINE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 COUNTRY BACKGROUND
3.0 POLICY ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (STI)
3.1 COUNTRY’S POLICY ON STI
3.2 STRUCTURE OF COUNTRY’S STI SYSTEM
3.3 FUNDING FOR RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION
3.4 STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT IN FORMULATION OF STI POLICY
4.0 FRAMEWORK OF COUNTRY OR ORGANIZATION POLICY
5.0 PROCESS/ACTIVITIES FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT
6.0 POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
6.1 HOW IT IS IMPLEMENTED AND MONITORED
6.2 CHALLENGES IN POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
7.0 NATIONAL INNOVATION PROGRAMS AND FORESIGHT INITIATIVES
7.1 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN GOVERNMENT
7.2 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVE IN INDUSTRY
8.0 RECOMMENDATION FOR ENHANCEMENT OF COUNTRY/ ORGANIZATION STI POLICY
9.0 CONCLUSION

6. 2.0 COUNTRY BACKGROUND
• South East Asia, Equator,
average 27ºC, 90% humidity
• Archipelago (stretched 5,200 km East to West, 67% sea)
• 1,904,569 square km landmass (13,466 islands ~ 400
inhabited, main islands : Java, Sumatera, Kalimantan,
Sulawesi, Papua, Maluku, Nusa Tenggara)
• ± 108,000 km coastline
• ± 257,516,167 people (est. 2012, 4th most populated country,
~ 60% in Java)
• ± 300 ethnic groups (major ethnics : Javanese, Sundanese,
Melayu, Bugis, Balinese)
• 16th largest economy.

7. OUTLINE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 COUNTRY BACKGROUND
3.0 POLICY ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND
INNOVATION (STI)
3.1 COUNTRY’S POLICY ON STI
3.2 STRUCTURE OF COUNTRY’S STI SYSTEM
3.3 FUNDING FOR RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION
3.4 STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT IN FORMULATION OF STI POLICY
4.0 FRAMEWORK OF COUNTRY OR ORGANIZATION POLICY
5.0 PROCESS/ACTIVITIES FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT
6.0 POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
6.1 HOW IT IS IMPLEMENTED AND MONITORED
6.2 CHALLENGES IN POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
7.0 NATIONAL INNOVATION PROGRAMS AND FORESIGHT INITIATIVES
7.1 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN GOVERNMENT
7.2 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVE IN INDUSTRY
8.0 RECOMMENDATION FOR ENHANCEMENT OF COUNTRY/ ORGANIZATION STI POLICY
9.0 CONCLUSION

8. 11 National priorities
1. Bureaucracy Reform and Governance
2. Education
3. Health
4. Poverty reduction
5. Food security
6. Infrastructure
7. Investment and business climate
8. Energy
9. Environment and disaster
management
10.Marginal areas, outer
islands/regions, post-conflict ridden
areas
11. Culture, creativity and
technology innovation
15 President’s specific priorities
1. Eradication of court law’s “mafia”
2. Revitalization of defense industry
3. Terrorism prevention
4. Nation-wide electricity availability
5. Increased food production and strengthened food
security
6. Revitalization of fertilizer and sugar factories
7. Regulatory improvement in land-use and regional
planning
8. Infrastructure development
9. Financial/credit support for SMEs amounted to
~US$ 200 Mio/year
10. Financing and investment scheme
11. Reformulation of Indonesia’s contribution to
climate change and environmental challenges
12. Public health reform
13. Harmonization between education and
employment
14. Disaster mitigation and management
15. Central and provincial/district governments
synergy.
3.0 CURRENT GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT POLICY
(2010-2014)

9. 3.1 NATIONAL POLICY ON STI : INNOVATION SYSTEM AS NATIONAL
COMMITMENT
• PERISKOP study - 2001, BMBF – MRT
• BPPT study since 2004
• National Long Term Development Plan 2005 – 2025 (includes
strengthening the National Innovation System/NIS to
support knowledge-based economy development)
• National Coordination Meeting on Research and Technology,
2008
• National Medium Term Development Plan, 2010-2014
• National Innovation Committee, along with National
Economic Committee, 2010
• Master Plan for the Acceleration and Extention of the
Indonesian Economic Development (MP3EI), 2011.

10. 3.2 STRUCTURE OF THE STI SYSTEM
Coord. Min of
Economy
House of
Reps.
Min. Just &
HR
NRC
10 Previous State-owned
Co’s (Strategic
Industries) :
1. PT. DI
2. PT. PAL
3. PT. PINDAD
4. PT. K. STEEL
5. PT. INKA
6. Perum Dahana
7. PT. INTI
8. PT. BHARATA
9. PT. BBI
10. PT. LEN
Finance-
related SOCs
Other
SOCs
Other Ministries
Ministrerial R&D
Organizations
Industrial R&D
Agency
Agr. R&D
Agency
NM Organizations
BPPT
LAPAN
BSN
BAKOSURTANAL
LIPI
BATAN
BAPETEN
Extention Services
Extention
Services
Extention Services
Min. of
Finance
Academy
of Sc. Ind.
Private
Univs.
Private R&D
Insts.
Min. Of Educ. &
Cult.
Ed. R&D Org.
State Univs.
Other R&D
Organizations
Extention Services
PRESIDENT
S&T Park
Other Coord. Min.
Nat. Dev.
Planning
Min. of SOC
Other
Ministries
MRT
NIC & NEC

11. 3.3a NATIONAL BUDGET 2011
10 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
1.Higher economic growth
2.Fewer unemployment and better job
3.Reduced poverty
4.Increased income/capita
5.Maintained economic stability
6.More significant domestic financing
7.Improved food and water security
8.Improved energy security
9.Higher economic competitiveness
10.Greener development.
BUDGET
• Rp.1,086.4 Trillion (120.67 Bio US $ at
9000/USD)
• Loan interests, domestic Rp.80.4, foreign
Rp.36 T (10.7%)
• Central government Rp.401.4 Trillion
(37%)
• Regional government total Rp.409.4
trillions (37.7%)
– Disbursed to 524 autonomous regions; 33
provinces, 398 Districts, 93 Municipalities - Rp.
378.4 Trillion
– Special autonomy regions- Papua and Aceh- Rp.
10.3 T
– Shared revenue to regions- tax, natural resources,
Rp. 82 T
– Adjustment for school grant/BOS and civil servant
Rp. 39 T
Presidential Remarks, 16 August 2010

12. GERD Rp. 4,720,341,818,344
GDP Rp. 5,613,441,700,000,000
GERD/GDP 0.08%
National GERD and GERD/GDP Ratio, 2009
0.03%
0.02%
0.04%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.02%
0.02%
0.03%
0.03%
0.04%
0.04%
0.05%
Higher Education Manufacturing Industry Government
GERD/GDP, 2009
Source: LIPI (Dec, 2011) based on R&D survey in University sector (2009), Industry sector (2010), and Government sector (2006)
Note:
1) Based on R&D Survey in University Sector, 2010
2) Based on R&D Survey in Industry Sector, 2010
3) Based on R&D Survey in Government Sector, 2008*
* the estimates with an average growth rate Goverment R&D
budget since 2005-2008.
Shows the breakdowon of R&D expenditure by
sector in 2009. Government and Higher
Education shares to the R&D expenditure were
higher (with ratio of GERD 0,04% for
Government and 0,03% for Higher Education)
compared to that of Manufacturing industry
(0.02%).
3.3b FUNDING FOR RD&I :
GROSS EXPENDITURE ON R&D (GERD)

13. GERD INDONESIA
Source: UIS, August 2010 Note: +1 = 2008, -1 = 2006, -2 = 2005, -3 = 2004, -5 = 2002.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
SouthAfrica
Sudan-2
Morocco-1
Botswana-2
Tunisia-2
Zambia-2
Uganda
Seychelles-2
Ethiopia
BurkinaFaso
Madagascar
Senegal-2
Malaysia-1
Israel+1
Japan
Rep.ofKorea
China
Singapore
Philippines-2
HongKong-1
Kazakhstan+1
Thailand-2
LaoPDR-5
India
Kyrgyzstan
Azerbaijan
SriLanka-1
VietNam-5
Iran-1
Cambodia-5
Indonesia-2
Mongolia
Armenia
Tajikistan-2
Brunei-3
Pakistan
Georgia-2
Australia-1
NewZealand
Business enterprise Government Higher education Private non-profit Unknown
www.uis.unesco.org
A breakdown of R&D investment in Africa, Asia and the Pacific. GERD by sector of
performance, 2007 or latest available year

14. Program
Administration/
Implementation
3.4a STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT IN FORMULATION OF STI POLICY :
INNOVATION GOVERNANCE
High Level
Policy Design/
Decisions
Program Design
Program
Management
Level 1
High Level Cross-
sectoral Policies
Level 2
Coordination
Centered on
Ministerial’s Mission
Level 3
More Detail Policy
Coordination &
Development
Level 4
R&D, and Innovation
Actors
Government Policy Councils
Research
Councils/
Institutes and
Academies
Innovation and
Technology
Agency
Other Supporting
Program
Organizations
Producers:
Company,
Farms,
Hospitals, etc..
Universities
R&D
Institutions
Program
Contractors
Ministry of
Industry
Ministry of
Research &
Technology
Other Ministries
BPPT’s
Strategic
Role
NIC

15. BPPT’s Relationships with Key
Stakeholders
STI
Partnerships
Universities/HEs,
Other R&D
Organizations, Ass
ociations
Private
Companies
Consulting
Policy
Recommendations &
Technology Audit (by
requests)
Program
Implementations
Ministries &
Government
Institutions
State owned
Companies
Audit & STI
Partnerships/
Services
Program
Inputs
MRT
Reports
President
BPPT
Reports & Policy
Recommendations/
Assignments
3.4b STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT : ORGANIZATIONAL LEVEL
House of
Representative
STI
Partnerships
STI
Partnerships/
Services
Foreign STI
Organizations

16. 3.4c ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

17. 3.4d THE ROLE OF BPPT
Intermediary
Technology
Solution
Technology
Clearing House
Assessment
Technology
Audit
Tech State
of the Art
Self-reliance
Competitiveness
Wealth,Prosperity,
Sustainability,Civilization
TECH. SERVICESROLES VALUE
PROPOSITIONS1. Recommendation
2. Advocacy
3. Tech. Transfer
4. Consulting
5. MSTQ
6. Operational Serv.
7. Pilot Project
8. Pilot Plant
9. Prototype
10. Survey
11. Technical
Reference
12. Tech. Audit
13. New Startup
1. Food Technology
2. Health and Medicine Technology
3. Energy Technology
4. Earth & Environmental Technology
5. Disaster Early Warning & Mitigation Technology
6. Advanced Material Technology
7. Information and Communication Technology
8. Transportation Technology
9. Security and Defence Technology
10.Manufacturing Technology
11.Innovation System
BPPT’s Priorities:
http://www.bppt.go.id

18. OUTLINE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 COUNTRY BACKGROUND
3.0 POLICY ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (STI)
3.1 COUNTRY’S POLICY ON STI
3.2 STRUCTURE OF COUNTRY’S STI SYSTEM
3.3 FUNDING FOR RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION
3.4 STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT IN FORMULATION OF STI POLICY
4.0 FRAMEWORK OF COUNTRY OR ORGANIZATION
POLICY
5.0 PROCESS/ACTIVITIES FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT
6.0 POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
6.1 HOW IT IS IMPLEMENTED AND MONITORED
6.2 CHALLENGES IN POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
7.0 NATIONAL INNOVATION PROGRAMS AND FORESIGHT INITIATIVES
7.1 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN GOVERNMENT
7.2 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVE IN INDUSTRY
8.0 RECOMMENDATION FOR ENHANCEMENT OF COUNTRY/ ORGANIZATION STI POLICY
9.0 CONCLUSION

19. Advanced Material
Food Security
Health & Medicine
Constitution
UUD -1945
Act No. 18/2002
National System on S&T
Act No. 17/2007
NLTDP 2005 - 2025
S&T Vision
2005 - 2025
Defence & Security
Information & Communication
Transportation
New and Renewable Energy
White Papers
2005 - 2025
NMTDP 2010-2014
S&T National Strategic
Policy
KIB II (Cabinet)
Vision & Mission
Regional Strategic Policy
Ministerial Agency’s SP
Non-Min. Agency’s SP
MRT’s Strategic Plan
ABP of Regional R&Ds
ABP of MAs
ABP of NMAs
ABP of MRT
AB of Regional R&Ds
AB of MAs
AB of NMAs
AB MRT
NRA 2010-2014
National Innovation System
4.0 COUNTRY POLICY FRAMEWORK ON STI
AnnualGovt.Budget
AnnualGovt.
Avtivity&
BudgetPlan

20. 4a. FRAMEWORK OF POLICY ON STI (BPPT)
1. Develop conducive general
framework/conditions for inovation and
business.
2. Strengthen knowledge institutions and S&T
supports, and enhance absorptive capacity of
industry (esp. SMEs).
3. Develop synergetic collaboration for innovation
and its diffusion, and increase knowledge-/
technology-based services.
4. Foster innovation culture.
5. Develop and strengthen integrated efforts of
innovation system and industrial cluster
development (at the national and regional
levels).
6. Develop and adapt strategic responses to global
changes and challenges.
Innovation Policy Framework :
The Hexagon
• National R&T Coord. Meeting 2008
• Strategic Plan of MRT 2010-2014
Academic Draft of the White Paper on the National Innovation System
1. Strengthening Regional Innovation System
(RIS) : as a vehicle to strengthen pillars for
fostering creativity-innovation at regional
levels (as an integral part of the National
Innovation System).
2. Industrial Cluster Development : as a vehicle
to develop the best potencies and to enhance
industrial competitiveness.
3. Innovation Network Development : as a
vehicle to develop linkages and partnerships
among actors, and dynamizing the flow of
knowledge, innovation, diffusion, and
learning.
4. Technopreneurship Development : as a
vehicle to modernize business/economy &
society, and to develop innovation culture.
5. Strengthening Thematic Pilars : as a vehicle to
improve the thematic and contextual
elements of the innovation system.
4
5
1
6 2
3
Strategic Initiatives:

21. Vision & Missions
of the National & Regional
Sustainable Development
4b. INNOVATION POLICY FRAMEWORK
AND STRATEGIC INITIATIVES
Flagship Programs
Innovation
Policy Framework
Strategic
Initiatives RIS
Industrial
Cluster
Innovation
Network
Techno-
preneurship
General conditions
Institution, S&T support, Absorptive cap
Interaction, knowlegde-based services
Innovation Culture
Focus & Coherences
Adaptability to global changes
Thematic
Pilars
Academic Draft of the White Paper on the National Innovation System

22. OUTLINE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 COUNTRY BACKGROUND
3.0 POLICY ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (STI)
3.1 COUNTRY’S POLICY ON STI
3.2 STRUCTURE OF COUNTRY’S STI SYSTEM
3.3 FUNDING FOR RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION
3.4 STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT IN FORMULATION OF STI POLICY
4.0 FRAMEWORK OF COUNTRY OR ORGANIZATION POLICY
5.0 PROCESS/ACTIVITIES FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT
6.0 POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
6.1 HOW IT IS IMPLEMENTED AND MONITORED
6.2 CHALLENGES IN POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
7.0 NATIONAL INNOVATION PROGRAMS AND FORESIGHT INITIATIVES
7.1 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN GOVERNMENT
7.2 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVE IN INDUSTRY
8.0 RECOMMENDATION FOR ENHANCEMENT OF COUNTRY/ ORGANIZATION STI POLICY
9.0 CONCLUSION

23. THE POLICY CYCLE
Agenda
Purpose
Assessment/
Analysis
Formulation
(Reformulation)
Implementation
Monitoring &
Evaluation
Participation
of Key
Stakeholders
Policy
Instruments
Control
Key
Performance
Indicators
• Data
• Good Practice
• Analysis, etc.
Policymaking

24. STAGES IN PROGRAM/ACTIVITY PLANNING
(MINISTRY/ORGANIZATION LEVELS)
IDENTIFYING
VISION, MISSI
ON
AND
STRATEGIC
GOALS
OF MIN./
AGENCIES
FORMULATING
INDICATORS
OF STRATEGIC
GOALS
(IMPACTS)
FORMULATING
INDICATORS
OF
PROGRAMS
(OUTCOMES)
PROGRAM
FORMULATION
FORMULATING
INDICATORS
OF ACTIVITIES
(OUTPUTS)
FORMULATING
ACTIVITIES
RECAPITULATING
PROGRAMS,
ACTIVITIES
AND
INDICATORS OF
MIN./
AGENCIES
STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 STEP 7
MAIN TASKS
OF
ECHELON 1
MAIN TASKS
OF
ECHELON 2
PROGRAM PLANNING STAGE ACTIVITY PLANNING STAGE
RECAPITULATING
STAGE

25. OUTLINE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 COUNTRY BACKGROUND
3.0 POLICY ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (STI)
3.1 COUNTRY’S POLICY ON STI
3.2 STRUCTURE OF COUNTRY’S STI SYSTEM
3.3 FUNDING FOR RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION
3.4 STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT IN FORMULATION OF STI POLICY
4.0 FRAMEWORK OF COUNTRY OR ORGANIZATION POLICY
5.0 PROCESS/ACTIVITIES FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT
6.0 POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
6.1 HOW IT IS IMPLEMENTED AND MONITORED
6.2 CHALLENGES IN POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
7.0 NATIONAL INNOVATION PROGRAMS AND FORESIGHT INITIATIVES
7.1 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN GOVERNMENT
7.2 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVE IN INDUSTRY
8.0 RECOMMENDATION FOR ENHANCEMENT OF COUNTRY/ ORGANIZATION STI POLICY
9.0 CONCLUSION

26. Important
considerations
Generic Strategy 
Priority SettingFocus
Significant
contributions
in
“strengthening
innovation
system” in
Indonesia
National Innovation
Policy Reforms
Legal Reference (incl.
assessment, technology
audits, policy
recommendations, academic
drafts, etc.)
Capacity building & Building
community of practice
Regional Pilot Projects
as Success Stories
Learning, Good/Best
Practices, Difussion, Scalability
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
IN STRENGTHENING INNOVATION SYSTEM
KPIs

27. 6.1 HOW IT IS IMPLEMENTED & MONITORED (1)
1. A Deputy Chairman propose the main themes of priority programs to the
Chairman. Based on the Chairman’s approval, the programs
(subprograms) are assigned to the centers/implementing units (IUs).
Centers/IUs can also propose the programs to the Chairman, through the
Deputy Chairman.
2. Every program (subprogram) is designed in more detail (by the “troika” :
Program Head, Chief Engineer & Program Manager) & should be
documented in a Program Manual.
3. Deputy Chairman is responsible for programs assigned/approved by the
Chairman, and proposed Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to the
Chairman.
4. Directors are responsible for program (sub-program) & activity
implementation, and proposed KPIs to the Deputy Chairman.
5. Participatory planning (with partners & key stakeholders), such
FGDs, workshops, etc. are conducted for detail activities.

28. 6.1 HOW IT IS IMPLEMENTED & MONITORED (2)
6. BPPT & Regional partners assign :
a. “Points of Contacts”/PoCs (Liasson Officers/LOs) to facilitate coordination &
communication
b. Implementation Teams/ITs (for particular programs/activities).
7. Monthly Individual Performance Targets (IPTs) are assigned hierarchically.
IPTs are used to monitor/evaluate individual achievements.
8. Activities are directed to contribute to the improvement of the Innovation
Policy Framework (IPF) relevant to the region. In some cases, regulatory
impact assessments are carried out in the program/activity
implementation.
9. Program/Activity Monitoring Process :
1. Internal Ad hoc Monitoring/Evaluation Teams (led by Directors and/or the
Deputy Chairman)
2. Independent Monitoring/Evaluation Teams :
• Inspectorate Team (Reports directly to BPPT Chairman)
• Bureau of Planning Team (reports to BPPT Chairman through the Principal
Secretary).

29. • 10
• 20
• 30
INITIATIVE 5
TAHUN 2012
• 10
• 20
• 30
INITIATIVE 4
TAHUN 2012
• 10
• 20
• 30
INITIATIVE 3
TAHUN 2012
• 10
• 20
• 30
INITIATIVE 2
TAHUN 2012
AN EXAMPLE OF A SIMPLIFIED ROADMAP IN STRENGTHENING
INNOVATION SYSTEM IN A REGION 2012 - 2015
• 10
• 20
• 30
• 40
• 50
• 60
INITIATIVE 1
2012
• 1B
• 2B
• 3B
• 4B
• 5B
• 6B.
2014
• 1C
• 2C
• 3C
• 4C
• 5C
• 6C.
2015
ESTABLISH & REVITALIZE THE PILARS OF INNOVATION SYSTEM THROUGH STRATEGIC INITIATIVES
• 1A
• 2A
• 3A
• 4A
• 5A
• 6A
2013
INITIATION UPGRADING EXTENTION RESTRENGTHENING

30. AN EXAMPLE OF PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IN BPPT’S PROGRAM ARCHITECTURE
FOR A PILOT PROJECT IN A REGION 2012
RISI – Stage 1
1. Revitalisze IPF to
support creative
city (regional
development)
2. Improvement of
Regional
Innovation Infra &
Suprastructures
Regional Innovation
System Initiative
1. Knowledge Transfer
2. Policy/Technical
Assistance
3. Fora
4. Other Technology
Services
• Teams
• Legal Documents
• Budget, etc.
NATIONAL PILOT PROJECTS IN AN AUTONOMOUS REGION (CITY/REGENCY)
TI – Stage 1
Industrial Cluster Initiative
Innovation Network
Initiative
Technopreneurship
Initiative
IMPACTS
OUTCOME
OUTPUT
ACTIVITY
INPUT
PROGRAM
ACTIVITY
SUB
ACTIVITY
Centers/Implementing
Units
ECHELON 1
INI – Stage 1ICI – Stage 1
STRENGTHENING THE INNOVATION SYSTEM IN INDONESIA
Thematic Initiative
Them. I – Stage 1
Centers/Implementing
Units
Centers/Implementing
Units
Centers/Implementing
Units
Centers/Implementing
Units

31. 6.2 CHALLENGES IN POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
• Political related issues
• Leadership – short-sighted vision/interests
• Capability - Human resource related issues (incl. regional
brain drain phenomenon)
• Bureaucratic system
• Very limited budget supports
• Limited basic infrastructures
• Limited involvement of local universities/HEs & business
communities

32. OUTLINE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 COUNTRY BACKGROUND
3.0 POLICY ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (STI)
3.1 COUNTRY’S POLICY ON STI
3.2 STRUCTURE OF COUNTRY’S STI SYSTEM
3.3 FUNDING FOR RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION
3.4 STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT IN FORMULATION OF STI POLICY
4.0 FRAMEWORK OF COUNTRY OR ORGANIZATION POLICY
5.0 PROCESS/ACTIVITIES FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT
6.0 POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
6.1 HOW IT IS IMPLEMENTED AND MONITORED
6.2 CHALLENGES IN POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
7.0 NATIONAL INNOVATION PROGRAMS AND
FORESIGHT INITIATIVES
7.1 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN GOVERNMENT
7.2 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVE IN INDUSTRY
8.0 RECOMMENDATION FOR ENHANCEMENT OF COUNTRY/ ORGANIZATION STI POLICY
9.0 CONCLUSION

33. 7.1 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN GOVERNMENT
The Minister of Home Affairs
and the Chairman of BPPT
REFERENCE MODEL
COMPACT E-ID READER
ISO/IEC 14443
TESTING THE SMART CARD
ISO/IEC 7810, ISO/IEC 7816,
ISO/IEC 14443
E-ID AND COMPACT CARD READER
Current Status :
• Model integration of
electronic components
and data reading of e-ID.
• Component integration to
verify finger prints.
• An initial compact model
of the e-ID reader.A National Dialog on e-ID 2012

34. 34
DRE (Direct Recording Electronic) System with an
activation by a smart card.
E-VOTING
VVPAT (Verified Voter Paper Audit
Trail) or audit paper with a barcode
security contains voice, Vtoken, and
digital signature.

35. STRENGTHENING INNOVATION SYSTEM IN THE CITY OF PEKALONGAN
Strengthening RIS Innovation Network
Batik Industrial Cluster
Technopreneurship Development

36. 7.2 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN INDUSTRY
‘Speech-to-Text’ technology
(“Perisalah”®) as a “Bahasa
Indonesia” speech recognition
system to produce documents &
meeting summaries automatically
and in a real time. The prototype
was introduced by BPPT.
Partner : PT. INTI (Limited)
• Was tested in various organizations
• Current progress : technology & product
development for various applications

37. FORESIGHT INITIATIVES
• Still very limited
• Some initiatives : energy, herbal medicine
• Midterm ~ Technology roadmap initiatives (in BPPT’s
technology programs) :
– ICT
– Energy
– Food
– New/advanced materials
– Etc.

38. OUTLINE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 COUNTRY BACKGROUND
3.0 POLICY ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (STI)
3.1 COUNTRY’S POLICY ON STI
3.2 STRUCTURE OF COUNTRY’S STI SYSTEM
3.3 FUNDING FOR RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION
3.4 STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT IN FORMULATION OF STI POLICY
4.0 FRAMEWORK OF COUNTRY OR ORGANIZATION POLICY
5.0 PROCESS/ACTIVITIES FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT
6.0 POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
6.1 HOW IT IS IMPLEMENTED AND MONITORED
6.2 CHALLENGES IN POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
7.0 NATIONAL INNOVATION PROGRAMS AND FORESIGHT INITIATIVES
7.1 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN GOVERNMENT
7.2 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVE IN INDUSTRY
8.0 RECOMMENDATION FOR ENHANCEMENT OF
COUNTRY/ORGANIZATION STI POLICY
9.0 CONCLUSION

39. 8.0 RECOMMENDATION FOR ENHANCEMENT OF COUNTRY STI POLICY
1. A clear & formal comprehensive innovation policy framework to
address the most essential systemic failures and to lead STI
advancement and utilization to contribute to high economic
growth, inclusiveness, and green/sustainable development.
2. Significant improvements in budgeting system :
a. Improvements in government budget mechanisms & supports
b. Better funding supports for STI advancement & utilization
(including effective incentive schemes).
3. Strong commitment to support innovation in
– industries important to enhancing competitive advantages,
– regional & the youth creativity-innovation development.
4. STI human resource development.
5. Better coordination & collaboration among key stakeholders.

40. OUTLINE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 COUNTRY BACKGROUND
3.0 POLICY ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (STI)
3.1 COUNTRY’S POLICY ON STI
3.2 STRUCTURE OF COUNTRY’S STI SYSTEM
3.3 FUNDING FOR RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION
3.4 STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT IN FORMULATION OF STI POLICY
4.0 FRAMEWORK OF COUNTRY OR ORGANIZATION POLICY
5.0 PROCESS/ACTIVITIES FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT
6.0 POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
6.1 HOW IT IS IMPLEMENTED AND MONITORED
6.2 CHALLENGES IN POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
7.0 NATIONAL INNOVATION PROGRAMS AND FORESIGHT INITIATIVES
7.1 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN GOVERNMENT
7.2 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVE IN INDUSTRY
8.0 RECOMMENDATION FOR ENHANCEMENT OF COUNTRY/ORGANIZATION STI POLICY
9.0 CONCLUSION

41. CONCLUSION
• Indonesia as a large country is moving forward, but needs
to move faster & in a much better pattern
• Significant improvements in STI policy are required
• Strong commitment & consistency to invest in innovation
may be among the most leveraging factors
• Collaboration/partnership within the country and
internationally is a must.

42. Dr. Tatang A. Taufik
Deputy Chairman
Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology
Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi (BPPT)
Gedung II BPPT, Lt 13
Jl. MH. Thamrin 8, Jakarta 10340 - INDONESIA
Telp. (021)-316 9441 / 9442
Fax. (021)-319 24127
E-mail: tatang.taufik@bppt.go.id
... in harmony we progress ...
Thank You
Gerakan Membangun Sistem Inovasi, Daya Saing
dan Kohesi Sosial di seluruh Wilayah Nusantara
(National movement to develop innovation
system, competitiveness, and social cohesion
through out the Country)