Reflections On The Revolution In France

Reflections on the Revolution in France
Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790)
Edmund Burke published the Reflections on the Revolution in France in 1790; after the Bastille had
been stormed by the Paris mol. He reflects upon about how France was very chaotic. Burke opposed
the values of his contemporary revolutionaries; and he predicted that the French revolution would
cause problems of fear and chaos to the country. Burke also believed that the revolutionary leaders
were more interested in themselves and that they wanted power, however; and really did not care
about the well–being of the French people. He believed in the concepts of liberty, equality and the
right for everyone; he argues that people should have the opportunity to own their private property.
Furthermore, Burke viewed the revolution as a violent takeover of the government, emphasizing that
citizens should not have the right to do this. He also argues about importance of tradition in that
tradition is what holds society together.
When reading Burke's book, we can see that he is making an argument against the enlightenment; it
encourages revolution and the destruction of traditional values: "The power of perpetuating our
property in our families is one of the most valuable and interesting circumstances belonging to it,
and that which tends the most to the perpetuation of society itself" (Burke 43). Private property is
the basis of a great working society. At the time French society was divided into social classes prior
to revolution.
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Summary Of A Reflection On The Revolution In France
After watching The Square and reading the Reflection on the Revolution in France, I find it's
plausible to say that Edmund Burke will disagree with the Egyptian revolution for three reasons.
First of all, regarding the purpose of revolution, Edmund Burke holds a different view with the
Egyptian revolutionaries. In the Reflection on the Revolution in France, Burke points out "The
revolution was made to preserve our ancient indisputable laws and liberties, and that ancient
constitution of government which is our only security for law and liberty... the very idea of the
fabrication of a new government is enough to fill us with disgust and horror"(Burke, 117). Edmund
Burke believes that the goal of revolution is to secure the inherited rights and forefathers' legacies.
He suggests that instead of demolishing the castle, which means to depose the former government, it
is better to repair it, which means to reform and improve its imperfect parts, laws for example
(Burke, 121). Thus, in his prospective, the idea of overthrowing the regime is extremely undesirable
and ineffective, comparing to the idea of reforming the old system and "making compromises" with
different political forces (Burke, 122). However, according to The Square, for Egyptian
revolutionaries, the ultimate purpose of the revolution is to completely abandon the old regime, to
remove the whole political system, together with its laws, its ruler, its government, institutions and
militaries, and to rebuild it by

Kenneth Burke Dramatism
One of my favorite rhetorical theorists, Kenneth burkes need completed wonders to correspondence.
Not main may be he proficient to correspondence theory, at he will be also referred to inventive
writing, social psychology, and semantic dissection. As much the vast majority noted theory, in
which I will make examining for this paper, will be that of dramatism.
Burke needs finished stunning things on state the thing that we realize something like
correspondence theory. As stated by Littlejohn (2002), any individual who may be composing
around correspondence today, somehow is restating something that burke required generally made.
Burke composed a few books in a period of fifty a considerable length of time managing principally
with typical theory.
Concerning illustration I said earlier, a standout amongst Burke's the majority noted hypotheses may
be dramatic. That primary idea of dramatism may be broken less than two parts: activity Also
movement. Activity may be something individuals do intentionally in method for their voluntary
conduct technique. Motions are practices that need aid non–purposeful what's more non–
meaningful. Littlejohn (2002) demonstrates that best people have activities and Questions Also
animals bring movement.
Activities manage the fundamental types from claiming thought. As stated by burke over a standout
amongst as much books entitled, "Grammar from claiming Motives" (1945), fundamental types for
thought cam wood a chance to be constructed predominant

A Political Philosophy Of Erich Przywara 's Analogia Entis
There is no explicit political philosophy found in Erich Przywara's Analogia Entis. While he seems
to analyze nearly every school of Western philosophy, the one philosophical movement he barely
acknowledges is the Enlightenment, which arguably lays the groundwork for much of Western
political thought. However if one compares Przywara with political thinkers of the Enlightenment,
he shares quite a lot with Edmund Burke, the father of conservatism. Before analyzing their
ideologies, it is important to recognize both men lived through similar circumstances. Burke and
Przywara both lived through a turbulent time of political instability. During the French Revolution,
Burke recognized the faults with the French. In his Reflections on the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
With this being said it is not the midpoint between these positions; Przywara uses Lateran IV's
formula "for every similarity there is an ever greater dissimilarity." Burkean conservatism, similarly,
is almost a spanning of other political philosophies. Take two other political philosophers Thomas
Hobbes and Jean–Jacques Rousseau, specifically regarding the nature of the state. Hobbes seems to
take the univocal position; the state is the unification of the people, the body, and the king as the
head, forming the Leviathan. With this being said the position flips into equivocity, because the king
is seen as the "greater dissimilarity." The problem Hobbes runs into is his absolutism; if the king
becomes a tyrant, all the citizens can do is to wait for a new king. (Duncan) On the other hand
Rousseau seems to take the equivocal position, believing the formal nature of the state is almost
unnatural. Rousseau however falls into the same dialectical flipping, switching to a univocal
position, specifically his notion of the social contract. Since all men are created equally, it becomes
the duty of the citizenry to depose of tyrannical ruler. (Bertram) These two ideologies lack the
"rhythm" of analogy, leading to the ideological collapse. Przywara explains this collapse as the
"either–or abrupt change" cause by the dialectic (Przywara 206). Burke, however, does not seem to
make the same

The Influence Of Edmund Burke On The French Revolution
The major ideas that Burke points out are, that society requires order and structure, like hierarchy.
He didn't think that everyone should or could be made equal, and he saw a purpose for the natural
divisions in society. Burke points out that the revolution would bring about anarchy, which in turn
would break down the social order that had held the society together for so long. Another point that
Burke makes is the value of tradition. He believed that you couldn't change a society quickly and
erratically because it destroys the values of the past. He didn't agree with the complete break from
the Old Regime because it had stabilized the society for so long. Instead of that he found importance
in building on what the country already had, and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
First starting with their political perspectives with Burke being very Conservative and Robespierre
being a Revolutionary. One of their main points in which they disagree is about change. Burke
would have highly disagreed with Robespierre's quick and destructive change of government. Burke
would rather see the slow change of government to preserve tradition and values of the past. Burke
saw the quick and messy change as radical. Burke also thought they should only remove what was
wrong and keep the rest so it's not a chaotic, and dramatic change. Burke believed that tradition kept
ties to the past and England instead of changing everything, changed from an absolute monarchy to
a constitutional monarchy keeping tradition intact. Burke thought people needed to learn from the
past. Whereas, Robespierre meant for it to be a rapid change because he didn't want anything to stop
in his opinion the dire need for change in the government, and he believed the entire political system
needed to be changed, with nothing of the old

Thomas Paine And America A Prophecy
Thomas Paine and America a Prophecy William Blake, poet of the Romantic Era, wrote in 1793 the
prophetic story America a Prophecy. The story begins with Orc breaking the chains that held him
down and sexually assaulting a young woman that has been taking care of him. The woman is
revealed to represent America and that she has been waiting for Orc to help her. Soon Orc and other
colonies under British rule attack the Prince of Albion and King George III. Alongside Orc are
historical figures such as; George Washington, Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Paine who fight for
the liberty of their country. The story ends with Orc liberating America from tyrannical rule and
influencing other countries to rebel.
The mention of Thomas Paine's in the prophetic story is not coincidental, as he and Blake were
involved with one another in real life. I believe that by having Thomas Paine appear in the prophecy
shows the importance of Paine's work to the American Revolution and Blake's own political views
and writing. I will analyze the text of America a Prophecy to have a better understanding of the
prophetic book and then give historical context to Thomas Paine's work and beliefs. By doing this I
will finally analyze the two writers and see where Blake's America a Prophecy, and Paine's own
work, specifically Rights of Man, agree and differ from one another.
In America a Prophecy, Blake has mixed his own mythology with historical figures and events. Orc
is a positive figure in Blake's

The French Revolution And The Enlightenment
The Enlightenment was an extensive intellectual, philosophical, and cultural movement that spread
throughout Europe, predominantly England, France and Germany during the 18th century. The
Scientific Revolution, which began in the 16th century, gave way to a new and revolutionary way of
thinking. It encouraged independent thought, the capacity to ask questions, and a progressive
attitude. Additionally, the enlightenment arose during a time when there was absolute monarchy and
an extremely powerful church. Political, philosophical, cultural, and religious ideas were in the need
of reform. The French Revolution was arguably an effect of the growing ideas of the enlightenment.
People within France finally had enough of absolute monarchy and wanted reform. Philosophers and
thinkers were crucial to the progress of the enlightenment. Thinkers such as Immanuel Kant, Jean–
Jacques Rousseau, John Locke, and Adam Smith were prominent figures of the enlightenment. They
questioned religion, promoted secularism, and freedom. Most believed that the government was to
be an extension of the people and should not be totalitarian. Locke and Rousseau were focused on
protecting the people's rights. Adam Smith focused on the economic aspects and promoted a free
economy without restrictions from the all powerful monarchy. He is the founder of modern
economics. Immanuel Kant focused on the problem with government and how the absolute
monarchy had been detrimental to the people. He argued that the

Edmund Burke Qualities
When election time comes around, the question everyone should be asking is, "What are the
qualities of a good leader?" Edmund Burke said "All persons possessing any power ought to be
strongly and awfully impressed with an idea that they act in trust, and that they are to account for
their conduct in that trust to the one great Master, Author, and Founder of society." Edmund stated
here that he believes a leader of any sort should trust in God, and give Him the glory for their
accomplishments, for He is sovereign over society. However, in a country like this where the
opinions of the people really do matter pertaining to the future human leadership, the people must be
sure to have the right ideas of what a leader should look like. Generally, qualities that ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
They must be committed to following God's Word in their life. For example, how a person leads
their own family is a tell of their ability to lead wisely. 1 Timothy 3:5 says, "If a man does not know
how to manage his own household, how will he take care of the church of God?" Although the
position in consideration in this verse is a church leader, this verse can be applied to any sort of
leader. If a person lives their own life and leads what they are already in control of according to the
standards set in God's Word, this commitment will likely continue in office. They will try to
establish rules based upon God's Word, stand up for God when faced with unbelieving opposition,
and stay committed to being the biblical type of good leader. What does the Bible say a good leader
looks like? In the Old Testament, Moses was told by God to choose men to be judges over the
children of Israel; these men were to be "able men who fear God, men of truth, those who hate
dishonest gain" (Exodus 18:21). If a leader is committed to God's Word, there he or she will find all
the answers to tough questions that come up in a position of

Comparing Burke And Wills
Introduction/Background Information Burke and Wills both came from very different backgrounds,
but despite this, they both found themselves in Australia attempting to explore the continent from
South to North. Robert O'Hara Burke was born in Count Galway, Ireland, in 1821, he was the
second of three sons of James and Anne Burke. After leaving school he decided to migrate to
Australia and in 1853 he entered the Victorian Police force. Then in 1860 he was appointed the
commanding officer of the exploration expedition to cross Australia from South to North
(Fitzpatrick, 2015). Having not been in the field of exploring and having no experience as a leader
of an expedition it was quite puzzling how he was appointed the principal of such a significant
operation. On the other hand John William Wills was born in 1834 in Devon, England, he was an
only child to William and Sarah Wills. As John's father, Dr William Wills, was interested in
Australia, he decided to buy a share in a Melbourne gold–mining company and because of this his
entire family moved to Australia. In Australia Wills studied surveying and later become an ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The men had left notes of their own at the dig tree which stated that "they had travelled down the
creek and were in need of food and clothing". Brahe and his other explorers had conferred in Bulloo
and eventually decided to return to Camp LXV. They arrived on the 8th of May, however, after only
three hours, concluded that there was no sign of Burke and his fellow explorers having been there,
and therefore didn't bother to dig up the cache which now contained the letter from Burke. As if this
wasn't enough, Wills returned to Camp LXV for one last look on the 30th of May. After searching
the site he was also completely unaware that anyone had returned to the dig tree after they departed
on the 22nd of

Edmund Burke And Conservatism
Edmund Burke
Edmund Burke was one of the leading voices and supporters of the conservatism philosophy in late
18th century Europe. An English Wig and Parliamentary, he was the author of Reflections on the
Revolution in France. A document in which he vocalized his conservatism ideology, expressing his
disapproval for the french revolution, which he argues was against tradition and popular authority.
The individual behind burkean conservatism, Burke was anti–enlightenment and anti–rationalist,
instead supporting traditional ideals. He claimed that ultimate wisdom and insight is found by
looking back on the lessons our ancestors have to teach us. Conservatism was a widely adopted
philosophy following the french revolution and in the middle of the industrial revolution. It was was
supported most often by those in power, who strived to maintain the status quo, and by the religious
community, as conservatism was paired with religion.
Communist Manifesto ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The pamphlet, aimed at the proletariat population strived to inspire a communist revolution that
would empower the very people that supported it, the working class. Marx and Engels believed the
working class, who lacked power individually, but collectively held the valuable commodity of
labor, could change the current political and economic system. The manifesto provided concrete
steps to obtaining this change, unlike the utopian socialists who came before the manifesto. The
pamphlet highlighted how the current economic system did not serve the majority of people. Marx
believed the working class would revolt out of

Edmond Burke Vs Rousseau
Rousseau vs Burke
Jean Jacques Rousseau and Edmond Burke may appear to fall on opposite extremes of political
ideology. Credited with having inspired the French Revolution, Rousseau is seen a proponent of
liberalism. Denouncing the French revolution on the other hand Burke is seen a strong advocate of
conservatism. As far removed from one another as these political ideologies may be, in some key
areas, some of the fundamental elements constituting the building blocks of of Rousseau and
Burke's individual political thoughts are to a certain degree comparable. Highlighted in this paper, is
their understanding of the freedom and liberty of man.
In the Discourse on Inequality, Rousseau states that in–order to understand man and the ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Man experiences the same impulsion but recognizes that he is free to comply or resist (Rousseau,
33)."
Like Rousseau, Burke too believes in freedom liberty of man in the broad sense of the word (Burke,
3). Liberty and freedom are important, but not enough to be allowed to completely upset the natural
order. Burke sees man as being born constrained by the and traditions of his ancestors. These
traditions include the institutions by which man is governed. Burke attributes the further
development and flourishing of society to the maintenance of the natural order and the respect and
upholding of these traditions. (Placeholder1)
Rousseau too acknowledges that deviation from the laws of nature can be detrimental to man. He
points out that though freewill places man at an advantage over other species, and perhaps even
other men, but he does not necessarily see it as being all good:
"Man, often deviates from such laws to his own detriment. A pigeon will die of hunger next to dish
filled with choice meats and a cat next to a heap of fruit or grain. Thus, desolate men give
themselves over to excesses that bring fevers and death, because the mind perverts the senses and
the will continues to speak when nature is silent (Rousseau, 33)"
With reference to emerging from the state of nature and entering into society, Rousseau highlights
that free–will brings with it reason. As reason develops, man becomes more industrious and begins
to adapt to

Romanticism Era
The Romanticism era of 1785–1825 was an age of which many people had their own idea of how
the period worked. Writers, philosophers, poets, artist and musicians all explored their mediums of
music, art and writing to express their own concepts. The key themes and ideas of romanticism
involves emotional expression, nature/natural worlds, imagination and individualism. A common
interest for many of these illustrator was to reveal something that we usually don't notice, similar to
showing the ordinary in extraordinary event. Within the romanticism period the French revolution
broke out a plethora of commentary; good and bad on this historical matter. Writers and
philosophers like William Wordsworth, Edmund Burke, and Samuel Taylor Coleridge ... Show more
Burke's associating the liberty and government system of France to that of a crazy person suggest
that he really opposes, as he so boldly gives his opinion.
Burke again reassures us that he won't do anything until it can be proven. As if the French revolution
was not enough 'proof' of reestablishing new social and political views. He actually argues that the
Revolution should have does not deserve his applaud suggesting that it should cherish the traditional
principles to get an applause. These statements challenge the work of the Revolution, which should
have been a resolution instead of a temporary fix that won't last. Burke uses those words
"congratulate", "power" and "blessing" to convince that high praise are to desire. (2) Burke uses
vocabulary such as "doubtful" and "do they/these" to question their decision and maybe consider his
claims, as this tone of wisdom draws attention he directly makes the argument that he is right and
the revolution is wrong. (6) While Coleridge was apologetic of his hopes, Burke want to control
them. In England the government ordered with a parliament. There were revisions and management
in the monarch, but Burke plays it down. As though the Parliament was created as a

Tradition in The Lottery, by Shirley Jackson Essay
Tradition in "The Lottery"
There are many things that people do every day without questioning why they do them. These are
our habits and traditions, and though for the most part they are unimportant they can be a crucial
part of our culture and our interactions with each other. Sometimes there are traditions that can
cause harm or are morally unacceptable. What should be done in this case? Edmund Burke, a
nineteenth century politician and author, argues that it is best to stick with tradition rather than
causing dramatic changes in people's behavior. This is a key component in his argument against the
French Revolution in his essay "Reflections on the Revolution in France." In this essay he argues
that the revolution will only lead the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Families stand together and
there is quiet conversation between friends. Mr. Summers, who runs the lottery, arrives with a black
box. The original box was lost many years ago, even before Old Man Warner, the oldest person in
the village, can remember. Each year Mr. Summers suggests that they make a new box, but no one is
willing to go against tradition. The people were willing to use slips of paper instead of woodchips as
markers, as the village had grown too large for the wood chips to fit in the box. A list of all the
families and households in the village is made, and several matters of who will draw for each family
are decided. Mr. Summers is sworn in as the official of the lottery in a specific ceremony. Some
people remember that there used to be a song and salute as part of the ceremony, but these are no
longer performed. Tessie Hutchinson arrives in the square late because she has forgotten what day it
was. She joins her husband and children before the lottery can begin. Mr. Summers explains the
lottery's rules: each family will be called up to the box and draw a slip of paper. One of the villagers
tells Old Man Warner that the people of a nearby village are thinking about ending the lottery. Old
Man Warner laughs at the idea. He believes that giving up the lottery would cause nothing but
trouble, and a loss of civilized behavior. A woman responds that some places have already given up
the lottery. Everyone finishes drawing, and each

Analysis Of The 2011 Riots
A 'riot' is commonly defined as a disorderly behaviour, which often involve violence and the
destruction of property (Andrews, 2014, p. 292). Riots can be viewed from a Conservative point of
view and from a Radical point of view. Conservatism and Radicalism are both political ideologies.
Although ideologies are 'explanatory frameworks that help to make sense of society' (Andrews,
2014, p. 306), conservatism and radicalism contrast in many ways. Conservatism is associated with
wisdom, limited politics, and natural hierarchy, legitimising the existing order. Radicalism is linked
to progress, universal rights and popular sovereignty, suggesting alternative to the existing order
(The Open University, 2016b). Conservative view and radical view on ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The conservative view is illustrated by then Prime Minister David Cameron, in his 2011 speech on
the riots where he disregarded social poverty and unemployment as motive for the 2011 riots.
Cameron then stated that: "And this riots were not about poverty", furthermore blaming
'Irresponsibility. Selfishness. Behaving as if your choices have no consequences' (Cameron, 2011
cited in Andrews, 2014, p. 309). This is an example of conservative ideology on riots. Geoff
Andrews in his analysis of David Cameron's speech, highlights how Cameron is using words such
as irresponsibility and selfishness, and is placing the blame on individuals rather than social
inequalities (The Open University, 2016b). Although this was not a new idea. In Reflection of the
Revolution in France, published in 1790, Edmund Burke argues that French Revolution was
'motivated by self–interest and disruptive elements' (Burke, 2003 [1790] cited in Andrews, 2014, p.
304). Burke further pinpoints that the riots were induced by 'greed and violence', citing the actions
of the 'mob' (Burke, 2003 [1790] cited in Andrews, 2014, p. 305). This reference to the power of the
mob is still used today when Ian Kinsella describes the 2011 riots on the BBC in the film
'Newsnight on the 2011 riots' (The Open University, 2016a). Mr Kinsella, a Business Man from
Manchester with conservative view, pinpoints the fact that there were no rules and that the disorder
was reflected in the power of the mob. In summary, the conservative view of riots stresses the
disorder, the irresponsibility, the individual lack of moral, the threat to private

Edmund Burke's Concerns For The French Revolution
Burke, Edmund Burke is an Anglo–Irish politician and a writer. He wrote a controversial book based
on his reaction about the French revolution in England. Burke supported conservation that everyone
should have a leader (monarchy) and continue to have right given upon you by the king. Burke's
main concerns for the French revolution was rebellion. He didn't like the French revolution based it
would create chaos and violence. Wordsworth was a poet who expressed this emotion on paper. He
was also optimistic about the revolution, he thought the French might help the poor. For instance "O
pleasant of exercise of hope and joy! ...but to be young was very heaven" He was advocate of
conservation. Both would agree that even though everyone yarns for

How Does Edmund Burke Reflect On The French Revolution
Edmund Burke was a British statesman who was deeply involved in English public life. He was
born in Dublin in 1729. He was a prominent political thinker and took part in many political issues.
Burke became a significant character in political theory. He was also a Whig politician and served in
parliament from 1765–1794. While Burke served in Parliament, he became convinced that the
government responds to the practical needs of the people in which they govern. Burke anticipated
that the French Revolution would cause anarchy.
France was ignoring the very institutions that upheld order in their society. The chaos this was
creating caused corruption. Burke believes that the French revolutionaries were destroying the
French society. Throughout ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even though a tradition may have worked for the people at one point, it is not guaranteed to work
for the people at another time. The world is always changing around us. However, instead of
throwing away a whole tradition that has been used in the past, and clearly worked, just repair the
tradition for it to fit the way of life. Moving on, I completely agree with Burkes argument on private
property. The government cannot unfairly portion a man's property. Burke's "Reflections on the
Revolution in France" was such an interesting text to read. His ideologies may have seemed absurd
at the time, but they have been used through out history. Burke involved a lot of philosophy in his
writings and this is why his ideas were unheard of at the

Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France and...
In this paper I will compare the theories and ideas from both Edmund Burke's Reflections on the
Revolution in France and John Stuart Mill's On Liberty. In comparing these two philosophers, I will
be paralleling their ideas and my own ideas I will be attributing them towards the modern day
whistleblower, Edward Snowden. Political figures, government representatives and philosophy
advocates have carefully studied Burke's and Mill's writings over hundreds of years to better
understand their theories on governmental control in a society. One of, if not the most noteworthy
concept in both their famous writings revolved around the concept of governmental control in a
society. Both Burke and Mill have their own theories; they also have many ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He was a committed advocate of utilitarianism. Mill made it known that he was a strong supporter
of giving the power back to the minorities. The minority citizens in a society are the people who
always challenge the system and keep the society advancing and evolving. He recognized that the
only way we as a society can evolve and prosper is to find a way to give the minority a voice.
Edward Snowden is an infrastructure analysis for the NSA. Snowden disclosed classified
information to the general public and confidential government mass surveillance programs to the
press. He was announced as the NSA's public whistleblower. His views for these actions are based
upon the underlining truths of both Burke and Mill's theories. He believed that giving the minorities
a voice in what their superiors are doing is the right thing to do. As Snowden stated in his interview
"The public is owed an explanation of the motivations behind the people who make these
disclosures that are outside of the democratic power." (Kevin M. Gallagher) It is with his great
power that they had to make a decision. Knowing he did not like the fact that the public does not
know what he is capable of doing, does he tell everyone openly and possibly put himself at risk? Or
does he keep everything still to himself and not worry about the following consequences or what
could happen to him.
Edmund Burke was a true leading figure of the conservative party. While he was writing his piece

Analysis Of Edmund Burke's Intend To Have Been Sent To A...
Edmund Burke was a political theorist and statesman. During this time period a lot of changes were
taking place all around the globe including the French Revolution. In 1790 Burke began writing his
Reflections on the Revolution in France in the form of a letter addressed to "Intend to Have Been
Sent to a Gentleman in Paris" to share his point on the issues that were going on. After completion
of his writing it quickly became popular selling thirteen thousand copies in the first five weeks and
later having gone through eleven editions within the first year. Today Reflections has become a very
important piece that helped voice the people during that time and has said to be "the most eloquent
statement of British conservatism favoring monarchy, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Throughout the reading I get the feeling that Blake believes that the French Revolution was
ridiculous and absurd and believes in the idea that life is not fair. For example Blake states:
"Everything Seems out of nature in this strange chaos of levity and ferocity, and of all sorts of
crimes jumbled together with all sorts of follies" (187). At this point Blake was saying that good
things can be brought out from the most absurd and ridiculous things, meaning the revolution.
During the revolution officials were being challenges as well as the rules. People were arguing about
who the authority should go to. Burke said: "From the Magna Carta to the Declaration of Right, it
has been the uniform policy of our constitution to claim and assert out liberties, as an entailed
inheritance" (188). This meaning that from the very beginning laws were set to prevent arguments
such as these but yet they continued to argue amongst themselves over these issues. From the very
beginning it stated that the line succession must be passed down and through that prevents future
generations of heirs from making their own decisions. This can be tied into another quote Burkes

Edmund Burke French Revolution
Summary Assignment Reflections on the Revolution in France by Edmund Burke depicts the French
revolution as an event which is both dreadful and prone to ridicule. The author goes further by
describing the French revolution as an incident varying disdain and atrocities. To start off his
reflection, Burke asserts that liberty is a legacy left to us from our ancestors, not as a human right,
but rather as a belonging. He then depicts the incidents involving the King and Queen as a
bloodshed by describing the scene of the kidnapping of the royal family in a rather violent manner.
The author thinks of the death of the king and queen of France as a disgrace. Burke claims that a
king is nothing but a man and that his murder is similar to the murder ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He claims that human beings share a common ancestor with other mammals. To start his work,
Darwin states that the structure of a human at an early embryonic stage is very similar to the ones of
other species which hints that humans and animals are somehow genetically connected. He then
asserts that in many species, the males are the most active in courtship and that the decision of
whether coupling occurs or not is left to the female. The author believes that man's unconscious
selection towards certain caracterisitics would result in offsprings being modified in such a way that
the said caracteristic is present in the offsprings. Darwin then claims that the female in many species
also plays a role in sexual selection by knowing which caracteristics to look for in a male. The
author explains that not all genetic modification has the same purpose. He then precises that our
cerebral system indirectly affected the way we now are physically and mentally. In conclusion,
Darwin states that humans still carry physical traces of their less intelligent

The Man Of The Modern Conservatism
Burke, the father of the modern conservatism, is well known for his criticism, or contempt of the
French Revolution; assuming so, it is not hard to doubt that he in fact sympathized with the
American cause. If he is the true father of the conservatism, then the reader may be surprised to hear
that he sided with the colonists; however, his decision makes a sense if we acknowledge that Burke
regarded the American Revolution as a revolution that is not too far apart from that of the Glorious
Revolution, unlike the French Revolution. Paine would argue otherwise by using the Universalist
language that the French would used; however, in the eyes of Burke, the colonists are the true
Englishmen, who are asking for returns that are entirely rational, and perhaps historical to the
English culture of pursuing liberty. French, in the other hand, did not have any concrete foundations
for their pursuit of liberty. The rule by the mass under equal findings were never heard of nor
realized, which makes Burke to beg the question of feasibility. In short, Burke, who finds the
justifications from the traditions as a conservative, fully acknowledges that the American colonists
are articulating their needs of self–governance and liberty within reason and within reach; in
contrast, Burke despises the French Revolution, since it is to dispose the traditions and the societal
mechanisms that France developed over time, through complete overturn of the society and denial
of the past. Turning to

Language Analysis : The Big Screens
The Big Screens
Language is our ability to understand the systems of communication. Language helps shape how we
perceive the world around us. Language can be used in various forms of text, speech and written
communication to inform, engage and even persuade. The focus of this analysis however will be on
the persuasive aspect of language. The use of language to persuade is interesting because it can
unconsciously filters our view of reality. Terministic screen is a term attributed to Kenneth Burke
which describes this concept of persuasive language. Terministic screens are also used to identify
who we are and what we believe. Viola Davis's Emmy Acceptance Speech uses elements of
terministic screens to persuade her audience to create more opportunities on television for women of
color. The use of terms impacts how we come to understand an act or person. As Burke sates
terminology is a reflection of reality, by its very nature as terminology it must be a selection of
reality; and to this extent it must function also as a deflection of reality." (Terministic Screens, 45). A
reflection of reality can be defined as our perception of reality what we believe is to be true.
However, in the same sense we must also understand that our truth may not be what someone else
believes. Nonetheless, the acts that we question are but a selection of reality. For example, in Viola
Davis's acceptance speech she starts off with a quote by Harriet Tubman. The quote reads " 'In my

What Is Edmund Burke's Idea Of The American Revolution
Edmund Burke was very against the idea of Revolution in France and Enlightenment movement as a
whole. He believed that they were both detachments from the old government and ideas that kept
France functioning for hundreds of years. He believed that revolution would turn France into a
chaotic state, and the countries future after the revolution would be uncertain. He believed that a
Republic could not provide France with peace and would destroy the morals that had existed in
France for hundreds of years. Burke thought that a Republic would just cause more problems that
the people of France could not understand/handle. Burke believed that principles of monarchy and
Christianity of the Ancien Régime helped French society function and stay a reputable society. He
states that the last French Revolution was complete chaos that did nothing but kill people and
destroy rationality and morals. Lastly, he asks the reader if the chaos another revolution would bring
is worth obtaining equality. Though I disagree with Burke, I can understand that his point; his
opinion is definitely a product of the time he lived. I do agree with him on his point of the previous
Revolution being surrounded by chaos; it was truly a circus. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This is an abuse of liberty as well as freedom and it goes against the natural rights of humanity. By
silencing an individual, you may as well be silencing mankind; just like a monarch who is not able
to suppress the opinions of the people under a liberal constitution, the same goes for the entire
nation that should not have the right to suppress the beliefs of any one man. I find Mill's beliefs to
be refreshing, and I think it is the beginning of the freedom of speech as a widely accepted belief in
the Western world. I agree that though some people's beliefs are toxic and may be infuriating (for
example, Trump) it is unfair to silence

Delphia Burke Analysis
Philadelphia Burke, known as P. Burke throughout the story, goes through a series of electronical
implants and body modifications that allow her to mentally control another body that was artificially
created from a modified embryo. With her perfectly ideal body, she takes on months of training in
charm and etiquette and eventually meets the higher–ups of the corporation in charge, who explain
that her new job is to be a celebrity traveling all over the world buying and using products as a way
of product placement. Delphi, her new name and identity, is brainwashed into accepting a life of
constant product sponsorship and then escorted out of the meeting room to begin her new life. This
short story takes place in the distant future, where everything ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Cantle, a fatherly man. Mr. Cantle asks Delphi if she knows what advertising is and "Delphi's eyes
widen and her little chin goes up" (Tiptree 7). She is shocked by the dirty talk, knowing that
anything advertisement–related is tabooed, but proceeds with her answer. Mr. Cantle then gravely
explains the history of how advertising became illegal, providing more background for the reader.
After his explanation, he then asks Delphi a series of questions related to consumer products, finally
getting to his primary point of celebrities and product placement. When Mr. Cantle tells Delphi that
she is not only going to be advertising products for them, but also keeping this ordeal a secret,
Delphi is baffled by this illegal task. However, Mr. Cantle reassures her by pointing out the perks of
advertising and how it boosts the evolution and efficiency of society. Mr. Cantle's "inner fire is
showing" (Tiptree 9) through his speech and suggests to the reader how passionate Mr. Cantle is in
defying the Huckster Laws. To finally convince Delphi to comply, Mr. Cantle mentions the parties,
clothes, and suncars that she'll get to experience which causes "the ethics of product sponsorship [to]
float far away" (Tiptree 9) from her head. Delphi's desire for a new life, incomparable to that of her
old one, causes her to disregard the legality and ethics of her

Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine's Views on the French...
Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine's Views on the French Revolution
Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine were two of the several strongly–opinionated individuals writing
back–and–forth in response to what the others were saying about the French Revolution. Burke, a
critic, writes first. Paine, a supporter, responds. In the excerpt from "Reflections on the Revolution
in France", Burke argues in favor of King Louis XVI and his wife, Marie Antoinette. When Marie
was murdered, Burke says, "As a man, it became him to feel for his wife and his children, and the
faithful guards of his person, that were massacred in cold blood about him; as a prince, it became
him to feel for the strange and frightful transformation of his civilized ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
My favorite point that he made is that if the arts are lost (and I think this still applies), we'll become
"a nation of gross, stupid, ferocious, and at the same time, poor and sordid barbarians, destitute of
religion, honor, or manly pride." Thomas Paine retorts in an excerpt from "Rights of Man" with an
argument that can be boiled down to this line: "It is the living, and not the dead, that are to be
accommodated." He argues that the current generation needs to be in control of their society, and not
under the control of a society formed by the past generation, most of which is dead. He says, "The
vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave, is the most ridiculous and insolent of all
tyrannies. Man has no property in any man; neither has any generation a property in the generations
which are to follow." He attacks Burke's motive, saying Burke never believed there would even be a
revolution because the French lacked the spirit and the fortitude, "but now that there is one, he seeks
an escape by condemning it." In my opinion, Burke is the far more persuasive one. Burke uses real
arguments against the Revolution, but Paine resorts to exaggeration and personal attacks. Burke
makes a very convincing argument for chivalry, the proof of its validity being in the current

The French Revolution And The Revolution
When people think of the French Revolution, they immediately think of the country of France and
how the Revolution affected it. What most people do not think about however, is how the
Revolution affected other countries, specifically the country of England. England was affected
positively and negatively by the Revolution in that there was an increase of political involvement,
but there was a collapse in the economy due to war declared by France. The French Revolution
created a battle of conflicting ideologies in England that did not only last the entirety of the
Revolution, but caused the formation political divisions that would last for many years (Mather).
The majority of people of England seemed to be quite supportive of the Revolution at first. When
news of the Storming of the Bastille reached them, they were hoping that it would be a new start for
France, and a chance for a more friendly relationship between the two countries (Tombs 383).
The first major response was given by a Preacher named Richard Price, when he gave his keynote
address, A Discourse on the Love of our Country, to the Society for the Commemoration of the
Revolution of Great Britain at the Old Jewry, a meeting house, in London November 4, 1789. He
thought positively about the ordeal in France, comparing the revolution to a light that would
illuminate Europe and a warning against oppressive governments, as well as an encouragement to
those who strived for liberty (HistoryGuide).
A few intellectuals

Edmund Burke Sublime
The sublime moment: a moment of total tranquillity and wonderment, a rare but overwhelming
experience that mankind is blessed to behold. Originally imagined by Longinus as far back as 300
BCE, it exists as beauty of the most profound degree, and is so very exquisite that it cannot be truly
recreated by man, as Edmund Burke wrote in his essay "A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of
Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful." Burke believed that we must experience the sublime
physically, and witness that which is beautiful with our own eyes to truly appreciate its splendour.
On the other hand, in her essay "FOAM," Anne Carson argues that through the art of language, a
sublime moment could be recreated by allowing a reader to mentally envision ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
While the sublime began as something traditionally beautiful and natural, like a sunset, it was
Burke's belief that something does not necessarily have to be appealing to be sublime. When
experiencing a sublime moment, one is overcome by passion, and therefore can ironically be
extended to that which is grotesque. The feeling of complete terror, for instance, can be described as
sublime according to Burke. In his essay he writes, "No passion so effectually robs the mind of all
its powers of acting and reasoning as fear. For fear being an apprehension of pain or death, it
operates in a manner that resembles actual pain. [It] is sublime too." Indeed, pure and utter terror is
sublime for the vastness and power of its effect. According to Burke, the feeling of power, too, is
sublime; even the actual feeling of being overpowered. This he compares to the concept of God: the
fact that we love God despite being afraid of God and bowing down to the power He has over us,
meek and humble servants in His presence. Our feelings of worship and loyalty are linked to fear.
We do not fully understand God, Burke claims, hence making Him obscure and elliptical, yet we
love Him all the same, and the paradoxical nature of our worship makes it sublime, too. This clearly
deviates from Longinus' original philosophy of the sublime being

Causes Of The French Revolution
Bloodshed, hunger, anger, chaos, and abuse. These were all things that characterized the French
Revolution. Through the terrible depression of this time, many people were driven to rise up against
the French government, resorting to violence and inciting chaos, as this seems like the only way for
the voices of the French citizens to reach the ears of the nobility. The simplest thing such as the
hunger of the people and the prices of bread are being ignore by the ruling class of the nation.
Though the weight of these issues is quite hefty, there are better ways to go about addressing them
than nonsensical violence. The French Revolution brought many issues to the country, it came to
quickly causing instability from rapid change to radical new ideas based on somewhat flawed views
of human nature, and as the Revolution progresses the violence will get worse, causing the
government to strike back at its own people.
One of the main issues with the French Revolution is that it's trying to incite change to quickly,
causing a rapid expulsion of traditions and in turn causing the civilization to become unstable.
Civilizations are built over centuries and much of the foundation for a country are built over time
with the buildup of the traditions of that country's people. These beliefs and traditions are what
made that country function and flourish in the first place, so if you remove them, in essence the
nation is being forcefully returned to a previous state which in turn causes a

Chivalry in Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution...
Chivalry in Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France
...But the age of chivalry is gone...
Amidst a wealth of metaphors and apocalyptic maxims, this line is perhaps the most memorable
from Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France. He masterfully employs the concept
of chivalry to express his anti–revolutionary sentiment, and he dramatically connects it to images of
land, sex, birth and money to express the widespread disorder that accompanies a loss of chivalry.
Nowhere is this idea more explicit than in the following passage:
...–But the age of chivalry is gone. –That of sophisters, oeconomists,
and calculators, has succeeded and the glory of Europe is extinguished for
ever. Never, never more, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
What it does imply is that the glory and bond of Europe as a conglomerate in which England and
France are leaders may have been severed.
Furthermore, it is unlikely that Burke believes either of the aforementioned statements. Subsequent
lines in the essay like, "...we still bear the stamp of our forefathers" and "We have not (as I conceive)
lost the generosity and dignity of the fourteenth century..." suggest that English society still clings to
its heritage and manners to some extent (18). Additionally, one cannot overlook the prophetic nature
of Burke's claims; he predicts what will happen if chivalry is lost. He and the reader both recognize
that chivalry survives at least in the minds of men and sometimes even in the practice of men (like
Burke who acts chivalrous by defending chivalry), but also because Burke's motivation for writing
his essay would be significantly diminished if the revivification of chivalry were an impossibility.
Similarly, if he truly believed that the glory of Europe were gone forever and the ties permanently
severed, it is less likely that he would choose a Frenchman as the recipient of his philosophical
letter.
To comprehend Burke's argument based on chivalry, one must ascertain the meaning that chivalry
holds for him. The language of the passage at hand unveils terms such as "loyalty," "dignified
obedience" and "proud

Burke Litwin 1992
Juiimul lit MuiiagL–mcni )992,Vi>!. IK. No. 3, . '52.1–545 A Causal Model of Organizational
Performance and Change W. Warner Burke Teachers College, Columbia University George H.
Litwin The Graduate Center To provide a model of organizational performance and change, at least
two lines of theorizing need to be explored–orgatiizational ftuictioning and organizational change.
The authors go beyond description and suggest causal linkages that hypothesize how performance is
affected and how effective change occurs. Change is depicted in terms of both process and content,
with particular emphasis on transformational as compared with transactional factors.
Transformational change occurs as a response to the external environment and ... Show more
It was from these experiences that our model took form. As a case example, we refer to the work at
British Airways later in this article. For a more recent overview of that change effort, .see Goodstein
and Burke (1991). Other Organizational Models Frotn the perspective of both research about
organizations and consultation to organizational clients, we have experienced some frustration about
rnost if not all current organizational tnodcls that do little more than describe or depict. A case in
point is the 7S model developed by Pascale and Athos (1981) and futthcr honed by Peters and
Watertnan (1982). Parenthetically, lot us quickly add that by cotnparing our tnodel with others,
particularly those the teader may be familiaj" with, if not fond of. we wish to clarify the nature of
our thinking and. ideally, its distinctive contribution, not cast our comments in a competitive
manner. The strengths of the 7S model arc (a) its description of organizational variables that convey
obvious importance–strategy, structure, systems, style, staff, skills, and shared values (as will be
seen, we have incorporated these dimensions in one form or another in our model)–and (b) its
recognition of the importance of the intenelationships among all of these .seven variables, or
dimensions. The 7S model, on the

Edmund Burke Sublime
Tracing the roots of this highly significant bond, however, if to adapt them in any historically
meaningful way, would then require us to explore the central values that have resonated most,
generally speaking. For Edmund Burke, a political philosopher who was noteworthy still for
excursions into what's dubbed "aesthetic theory," and resulted in the foundation laid for some of the
earliest discourse on the sublime, with its specified grounds in beauty and terror. To traverse this
line, then, and possibly even indulging onto one side over another, is, as per Burke's treatise, quite
indicative of such a sublime experience, or, "it is productive of the strongest emotion which the
mind is capable of feeling" (Burke 36). Unnecessarily that which

Critique Of Marx And Burke
This essay will be arguing that Marx and Burke held heavily contrasted views in regards to the role
of religion in political. The topic of religion in politics has been highly debated throughout the ages,
and the viewpoints held by these two scholars is meant to exemplify the struggle of opposing
political ideologies. Marx believed that religion should be abolished and entirely separated from the
state, and Burke believed that church and state should remain united in governance. To support this
argument the use of their books the Reflection of the Revolution in France and the Marx–Engels
Reader will be referenced to provide evidence. In order to accurately compare and contrast the
thoughts of these two political theorist one must first ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He viewed this new and blossoming ideology flawed, and the inherent abstractness of its concepts to
be something that could easily see abuse. Without a proper physical form like a constitution for the
rights of man he asserted the new society created by the revolution would quickly crumble into
anarchy. He argued the tradition created from the continuity and reform of the laws since the time of
their ancestors is what gave civil societies real and legitimate rights. The traditions of society
allowed for it to achieve the ultimate goal of the social contract: the preservation of all of its
members. The destruction of this ancestry through the abolishment of the monarchy and the
separation of church and state would cause the very fabrics that held the previous society together to
break apart. He also argued that through the use of violent methods to achieve the revolution they
had left themselves open to usurpation from a greater military might, be it their own or a conquering
force. In all aspects of life he believed tradition to be an integral part, and by extension religion was
meant to be active in the political life of society by the prejudice that all men have the right to
conform. Burke's opinion on religion in the daily political life can be summarized in one quote, "We
know, and what is better, we feel inwardly, that religion is the basis of civil society and the source of
all good and of all comfort.(Burke)" Burke argued heavily in favor of governments having

Edmund Burke An Enlightened Thinker Analysis
The first three weeks of this course have focused on 18th century political and aesthetic treatises, on
what we would call Enlightenment thinking. Use Kant's definition of 'enlightenment' in his essay
"What is Enlightenment," and evidence from his speeches in the trial of Warren Hastings, to argue
whether Burke is actually an enlightened thinker.
In a lecture about 'The Burkean Outlook' at Yale, Dr. Ian Shapiro states that Edmund Burke was
anti–enlightenment. This lecture was based on Burkes's book called 'The Reflections of the French
Revolution'. This text provides a deep insight into the political philosophy Burke believed in and can
help us to make analysis about Burke's point character. This outlook, as the professor describes, is
based ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To Burke, putting Hastings to trial was equal to putting the entire machinery of East India Company
on trial. However, a racial bias that Burke holds inside him soon surfaces in another of his
addresses. He blatantly criticizes the Indian agents, and them them for enticing Hastings as he
otherwise would not be able to act as he did. Hastings' agent, Krishna Nandy, was the target of
Burke's greatest contempt, and in doing so he generalized Nandy's caste to the same fate. He went so
far as to call them 'low caste'.
Edward said in his book about orientalism explains the problem with orientalism. The two aspects of
orientalism are to sexualize and simultaneously brutalize the east. Enlighten requires one to wash of
such notions about people, places, cultures etc. and to focus purely on rationale, something that
foundations of orientalism opposes.
The biggest evidence of this is in one of the charges he presented against Hastings regarding the
treatment of the two begums of Awadh and their property, and the treatment of the women in
Rangpur of northern Bengal. The latter report was yet unconfirmed, but the spectacle that was
created out of the event was unlike any other. He asked a playwright to help him write the speech for
recounting the happenings of the case. If there has ever been a case of romanticizing the harassment
eastern women had to face at the hands of British officers,

A Vindication Of The Rights Of Men
Mary Wollstonecraft's epistolary essay "A Vindication of the Rights of Men" acts as a direct,
scathing response to Edmund Burke's opinionated piece regarding the French Revolution,
"Reflections on the Revolution in France". This essay will examine the use of satire as a mode in the
opening sections of Wollstonecraft's "Vindication", as well as comparing her lexical choices to those
of her addressee, Edmund Burke. The Oxford English Dictionary states that "satire" is "... [A] work
of art which uses humour, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize prevailing
immorality or foolishness, esp. [sic] as a form of social or political commentary." Humour is too
exaggerated to relate to Wollstonecraft's work, but ridicule as a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
However, her use of "manly" is not designed to encourage masculinity, but instead parodies his
ideas of political masculinity. "You see I do not condescend to cull my words to avoid the invidious
phrase, nor shall I be prevented from giving a manly definition of it, by the flimsy ridicule which a
lively fancy has interwoven with the present acceptation of the term" By refusing to be "prevented"
from "manly definitions", she is defining and rejecting the gender stereotypes that are pressed upon
her by being a woman whilst simultaneously parodying Burke's use of the term. There is a sense of
sarcasm within this that accentuates Wollstonecraft's subtle use of satire. She refuses to
"condescend", thus refusing to lower herself to his level, which is an attempt to invalidate his
arguments by drawing attention to Burke's own condescension within "Reflections". As Conniff
argues; "she adopted from classical rhetoric the stance of a virtuous and honest commentator intent
on revealing Burke 's corruption" – she places herself above Burke with her style of argument and
her semantic choices, working to deconstruct the core of Burke's argument and break down his
elevated political stance.
When writing "A Vindication of the Rights of Men", Wollstonecraft was a woman in a "man's
world". Her voice was a lone female amongst the opinions and politics of men and she "went up
against two of the

Compare And Contrast Burke And Thomas Paine
Two men, both fighting for the same cause during the American Revolution took different sides in
the French Revolution because of their political views. Thomas Paine took the side of the French,
opposing his own country, because he believed in a system where people can govern themselves.
Edmund Burke took the side of the English because he was supporting his country and believed in a
system where there needs to be a higher power to keep people in their place. Thomas Paine was a
radical in the way he thought and believed in a total reform of the way people were living at that
time. Burke was a Conservative and believed that things were fine just the way they were. Paine
also believed in Thomas Jefferson's statement all men are born equal ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The second contrasting point is that Paine believed in the total reform of society and Burke believed
that things were fine just the way they were. Paine thought that if people wanted something to
change, they could get it done. He wrote in his book Rights of Man that "revolutions were necessary
to destroy this "barbarous system" in order to create the conditions for peace, commerce, lower
taxes, and the "enjoyment of abundance." He was referring to the American and French revolutions
to get rid of the monarchy hold on them. Burke believed that wisdom of the past generations should
rule current generations. He believed that everything set up by the past should not be reckoned with.
He thought that laws, religious commandments, scriptures, and general ways of living were perfect
just the way they were. Paine attacked this theory once again in his book Rights of Man by stating,
"Governing from dead generations is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies." Paine
continuously attacked everything that Burke supported. These two men disliked each other very
much. They continued to spread their theories though. The third contrasting point is that Paine
believed that all men are created equal and they should be able to make something of themselves no
matter their level of class.

Feminist And A Work Of The Sublime
Kathy Acker: Postmodern Feminist or a Work of the Sublime?
Much has been said about Kathy Acker who was known as a punk feminist who dared to cross the
line between writing about living in a patriarchal society and becoming a patriarchal writer herself.
Acker is known for her novels such as Blood and Guts in High School and her retelling of George
Bataille's My Mother to the last novel that was a retelling of Robert Louis Stevenson's Treasure
Island. A common divide among the critics of Acker is whether she was a true postmodern feminist
writer or if she failed to achieve postmodern feminist status. Another argument is that Acker was, in
fact, a post–modern feminist but that she worked under the Sublime as detailed by Edmund Burke in
his 1757 book entitled The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, Vol. I and later
Immanuel Kant in his novel entitled Observations of Feeling of the Beautiful and The Sublime.
Although Kathy Acker is known as a postmodern feminist, she was also a writer of the Sublime
through her works such as Blood and Guts in High School, My Mother: Demonology, and Pussy,
King of The Pirates. Acker was, in fact, a postmodern writer who "created fictions that were
theories–in–performance, speculative fictions that act out suppositions of poststructuralism and
feminism" (Sciolino, 438). Each of the characters in her novels was a mix of sex–positive women
who have power while also not having power over their own bodies. Kathy Acker would often take
an

John Locke And Edmund Burke 's Political Rebellion
Both John Locke and Edmund Burke support political rebellion under specific circumstances. What
differentiates these two political theorists in their discussions of revolution? Please make reference
to both Second Treatise of Government and Reflections on the Revolution in France when
answering this question. Cite the texts and be specific.
Many philosophers and theorists have spoken on the value, or lack thereof, of revolution. In Second
Treatise of Government, John Locke builds the concept of a "social contract," which outlines
responsibilities of the government and what can be done if the state fails to uphold its duties.
Edmund Burke views political rebellion in a different light. He writes in Reflections on the
Revolution in France that upheaval does excessive harm to the state, and, by extension, the people.
While both Locke and Burke agree that rebellion is useful to the growth of a state, they differ on a
few main points. First, they disagree in terms of what circumstances warrant revolution. Second,
they each believe it should take different forms and work to different extents. Finally, Locke and
Burke believe revolution tends to have positive or negative effects, respectively. Their views on each
of these points will be discussed in turn. To understand their views on revolt, and when it is justified,
one must first review the responsibilities each believes the government to have. To Locke, the
government works to preserve innate rights, that is, rights

Party Of Three: A Narrative Fiction
Party of Three Detective James Campbell watched as Heinz walked out the door. "That man is such
a nuisance I'd kill him," he thought to himself. The two were the best detectives around but could
never come to an agreement. It seemed the only one who could make them work together was the
genius police officer Rebecca Scott. They both seemed to admire her cunning wit and skill. As he
walked out of the office, Heinz knew he was being watched by Campbell. He felt the man's stormy,
grey eyes on his back, imagined his face wrapped in a snarl. Despite all of this he was not
intimidated. He knew that he wouldn't have to put up with his snotty attitude for much longer. "It
was a beautiful day in Georgia," thought Sav as he walked down the luscious ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Who? When?" Shouted Campbell. "Last night he was found at the bottom of a hill. He was at a
party that night. The Lights were found with several gunshot wounds. Daffy says the best team to
solve it is the three of us. Said that because of your strength, my quick wit, and her smarts."
Campbell looked at him with a determined look on his face. "Then let's get started" said Campbell.
They all set off to solve the mystery. First they found out who was at the party. "Alright, so Sav
Stephen, Carl Tumilson and Nick Crane were all at the party. What were their motives?" asked
Campbell. After brooding over it for several minutes Rebecca came up with something. "A few
months ago, Crane and Tumilson attempted to industrialize a few parks and the Lights stood against
him. I remember Burke using his social influence to back them up." "Excellent," said Campbell
"What about Sav? Did he have a motive?" asked Campbell. Rebecca lingered on it for a moment
and then replied. "Not that I know of," responded Rebecca. It was getting late. Each went their
separate ways, promising to investigate the mansion the next morning. The next day, Campbell
walked up the lawn into the marble sanctuary of Sav Stephen. Rebecca Scott and Carter Heinz were
already there, sitting peacefully in large armchairs. Campbell smiled, they were lost in sanctuaries of
their

Michael Burke
The son of a fireman and the brother of a hero, Michael Burke, a writer for the Wall Street Journal,
exposed his feelings about the firemen and first responders that were not invited to the ten year
anniversary of the September 11 disaster in his persuasive article: "No Firemen at Ground Zero This
9/11?" To assist him in persuading his audience, Burke used various techniques to prove that Mayor
Bloomberg was unjust for not allowing the firemen and first responders to participate in honoring
their deceased brothers and sisters. Burke utilized pathos, imagery, and organization to prove his
point. There are several tactics a writer can use to connect with an audience; one can appeal to logic
and statistics, one to character and credibility, and one to emotion and feelings. Michael Burke chose
to connect with his readers through all three of these methods; however, pathos – appealing to ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Throughout the article Burke was providing detailed stories about the firemen's experiences during
the 9/11 attacks. As a side note, Burke writes for the Wall Street Journal, and a majority of the
readers are wealthy, influential individuals. Because Burke knew his audience, he used it to his
advantage. If he would have begun with his argument the readers would have immediately taken the
opposing side. Since he started with vivid and disturbing details, the audience adopted their opinions
before knowing what the argument even was. By the end of the piece, Burke had the audience on his
side. The audience – wealthy New Yorkers – may have tides to politicians who can make a change
to back up the real heroes. Michael Burke chose to anger the audience about the terrible ordeal so
that they would want to avenge the firemen and first responders. Burke wrote this piece to make a
difference, and ending with his main idea may have been the

Essay On The Sublime By Edmund Burke
While Edmund Burke posits the sublime as a passive feeling elicited in the viewer in the presence of
the superior powers of nature, William Wordsworth challenges this passivity by demonstrating the
role of viewer participation and active imagination in the creation of the sublime experience, thereby
reversing the power dynamic between man and nature, of which man is now in control.
Outline:
This essay examines the concept of viewer participation (or lack thereof) and by extension, the
power dynamics between man and nature through Burke and Wordsworth's work. Firstly, I will
demonstrate Burke's argument that the sublime is a passive feeling of the viewer through his
emphasis on the sense of 'sight' in his discussion of the sublime as a way ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
By analysing the structure (shift from external to internal landscape), language (tenses, pronoun),
and presentation of the experience of seeing the daffodils, I seek to demonstrate that feelings of the
sublime are only evoked when the narrator's imagination participates in the scene he has internalized
in his memory. While the first three stanzas exemplify a merely physical stimulus and response
mechanism to nature, the last stanza shows how active poetic imagination enables man to recreate
and amplify emotions encountered, thus resulting in feelings of the sublime. Why does the observer
not recognise the 'wealth' the scene brings in that moment? How does poetic imagination connect
the physical eye and the inner eye to allow for sublime, transcendental experience? Hess argues that
the poem "depend[s] for [its] power on the narrator's ability to fix a single, discrete, visually defined
moment of experience in his mind, to which he can later return in acts of private memory and
imagination" (298). An example of the recapturing of emotions is seen where "gay" (I. 15) is
recaptured as "pleasure" (I. 23) at the end. Active imagination, which draws inspiration from
memory of the initial encounter, is now a permanent possession that

Reflections On The Revolution In France

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Stefanie Yang

More from Stefanie Yang (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Reflections On The Revolution In France