The Most Serious Problems Facing Humankind

The Most Serious Problems Facing Humankind
The Most Serious Problems Facing Humankind The world today suffers numerous woes, many of
which have been present throughout human history. Human trafficking traps its victims in modern–
day slavery. Countries declare war for political or ideological reasons, unleashing chaos and death
upon the innocent. Starvation and disease run rampant while governments turn a blind eye.
Terrorists commit hijackings and suicide bombings upon everyday civilians. Many more
unmentioned obstacles exist throughout the world. Even more ominously is the fact that all of these
problems are not confined to one culture or continent. It is clear that all of humanity shares similar
problems with each other, despite the fact that our modern world should be more ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The theory of depravity is a more accurate understanding of our fallen world.
The Theory of Depravity as the Root Cause of Humanity's Problems
The theory of depravity explains that the world's problems are caused by the natural evil in every
person, regardless of a lack of resources. Not only has every person sinned in their lives, but every
person also has an inborn desire to sin. Even the most righteous people have evil desires. This
plague was brought to the world after Adam and Eve sinned against God, which caused the biblical
Fall of man. Their selfish desire to become their own gods was their own free choice, regardless of
the fact that God's garden satisfied their every need. As a result of man's disobedience to God, he
and his descendants constantly succumb to temptations and quarrel amongst each other for their own
personal gain. Thus, the only way to defeat evil is for people to freely choose God instead of their
own carnal pleasures. There is no man–made society that can cure evil through political restrictions,
since the external world is not the cause of man's internal rebelliousness.
According to Colson, the fall ruined the holiness of nature, brought death upon the world, and
required Jesus Christ to die for every person's sins. Those who humbly ask Christ for forgiveness
will be saved, and can help restore the world to Christ one step at a time. In contrast, Colson
explains that those
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Importance Of Moral Belief In God
This essay defends the claim that it is not illogical to believe in a God even in with the existence of
evil, this is called a theodicy (Creel, 2013, p.154). For the duration of this essay the following words
will be used: evil is anything that can destroy or ruin the natural functioning's of a human or that
interferes with the implementation of those functions, this does not mean a bad headache, for
example, but rather cancer, hurricanes and murder (Creel, 2013, p.152). Moral evil is described as
the misuse of free will, and the evil that pursues, on the part of a moral being in which the being
becomes responsible for the outcomes of that evil (Trakakis, 2005). Natural evil, then, are evils that
are out of the control of man and manifest in natural disasters such as cyclones, like the 1970
Bangladesh cyclone that claimed half a million lives (Jackson, 2014, p.129). In this essay the belief
in God will be explored, both the logic and the validity of arguments for and against the belief.
There are eight reasons that are often used to explain how both God and evil can coexist and that
defend the rational belief in God. First, the argument is that God is not responsible for evil as He is
not technically a person and for this reason cannot carry the blame for evil (Creel, 2013, p.154). The
next two ignore the problem of evil, the first saying that evil is merely an illusion, it is simply the
absence of goodness, just as darkness is the absence of light (Creel, 2013, p.155;

Evil And Innocence In Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales
Evil is a word that is rooted in thoughts and actions. The concept of evil is a convoluted force. In
Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales, morals are reexamined through each tale. Chaucer discusses moral
evil and its relevance to innocence, specifically in the The Pardoner tale, with the three rakes, and in
the The Prioress tale, with the young boy. The seducing of innocence to become dishonorable is evil.
All things wicked start from innocence. Innocence is beautiful. The three rakes and the young boy
illustrate the most simplest form of innocence, which reserves the revelation of evil. In The
Pardoner, the three rakes insist on discovering who "smote the man's heart in two" (Chaucer 349).
The murder, Death is dangerous and the rakes courageously took this opportunity to help themselves
and others from the danger. This demonstrates the rakes ability to want to improve other people's
lives while also showcasing the righteousness they contain. The murderer, Death, "shall be slain"
and the three men "pledged their word of honor to live and die for the other, / As though each were
the other's brother born" (371–374). Chaucer demonstrates the virtue these men have for themselves
and for each other. Although, they drink too much, they still embody supportive and honorable
friends. The hope that "death shall be dead, if they catch him" (381) depicts the beauty in their hopes
and innocence. The beauty of the widow's son, seven years of age, in The Prioress tale, it paints the
unknown

Aristotle and Hobbes on the Nature of Man
Why do men do what they do? Do some just have the right natural morals or do they just have a
beast within their chest. To know the true facts of how the world of the boys, in Lord of the Flies
turned from utopia in to a dystopia the reader must understand what Natural Actions of Men are.
Therefore the introductions of Aristotle's theory of Natural Man vs. Hobbes's theory of Natural Man
are placed on characters within the novel. Aristotle lays down two key ideas with in his theory of
"Human Nature". The first idea is the ethnic qualities of man, which included the features of thought
and body and is a development for contemplative excellence. The Second part of this theory is
Aristotle gives the outlook that life with contemplations is the basis of a truly good life. This
includes his views of how human incentives and the role of one's qualities will lead one to living the
good life. In "The Politics" Suzie Sparague introduces Aristotle's well thought out argument, in
which Aristotle argues that specific conceptions of "Human Good." At the same time as the reader
gets to this part of the book he/she is probably wondering what Aristotle means by human good.
Human good as seen through the eyes of Aristotle is the ability to be morally sound, or to be just in
the actions we make as humans. May Hope states almost the same thing from the book "Aristotle's
Ethics: Moral Development and Human Nature." She along with the arguments of Sparague states
that Aristotle's theory

Problem Of Evil In David Hume's Concerning Natural Religion
Carolina Ornelas
Professor P
Essay #4
18 May 2015 Problem of Evil In this dialogue of Concerning Natural Religion, there is an argument
that concerns many as to why there is still evil in the world when God is supposed to be infinitely
powerful, good, and wise. In order to understand Hume's philosophy of religion, it was crucial to
understand the basic beliefs of his theory of knowledge. It was believed that all knowledge of
matters of fact come through experience because you had to go out and investigate the world in
order to understand it instead of hoping to come up with really great knowledge on your own. I will
explain in detail the problem of error considered in this argument and its solution to it. After I
evaluate ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I recognize that God can work in mysterious ways and there must be a reason to why there is still
evil in this world. I believe that God takes part in, both, good and evil and is still infinitely powerful,
wise, and good. It is true that God has the power to remove evil acts but the problem with this
possibility is that there would be no one left and God would have to remove us all since we all sin
and commit evil acts. Ultimately, all evil causes harm to others whether it is people who are more
evil or people who are less evil. God could change everyone's personality so that they cannot sin but
this would also mean that we would not have a free will. We would not be able to choose right or
wrong because we would be programmed to only do right. If God had chosen to do this, there would
be no meaningful relationships between Him and His creation which is why, instead, he has chosen
to create a real world in which real choices have real consequences. God's desire is that for all of our
sakes we would obey Him but, instead, what happens is that we choose our own way, and then we
blame God for not doing anything about it. God does prevent and restrain some acts of evil, for this
world would be much worse without Him restraining

Theme Of Imperfection In The Scarlet Letter By Nathaniel...
Nathaniel Hawthorne was an author during the 1800s. Hawthorne was obsessed with the history of
the 1600s and the puritan societies that were short lived. In The Scarlet Letter, Nathaniel Hawthorne
writes about a small puritan village in New England, Massachusetts, set in the 1600s. In his novel,
The Scarlet Letter, Nathaniel Hawthorne uses the symbolism of a Wild Rosebush, Hester's Cabin,
and Sunlight & Forrest to contribute to the overall theme of Imperfection. First, Hawthorne utilizes
a Wild Rosebush to contribute to the theme of Imperfection. Hawthorne says, "...A Wild
Rosebush...Might be imagined to offer their fragrance and fragile beauty... to the condemned
criminal...that the deep heart of nature could pity and be kind to him" (Hawthorne 46). He writes
this quote explaining how when people enter the jail in this town, before they enter, the Wild
Rosebush is the last thing they see. When they see the Wild Rosebush, they take it as a nature having
pity for them by showing one more beautiful and elegant thing right before they get cast away into
the dark coldness of prison, which is one half of the imperfection. Not much later, Hawthorne also
exclaims, "This rosebush ... It may serve, let us hope, to symbolize some sweet moral blossom ... or
relieve the darkening close of a tale or human frailty and sorrow" (Hawthorne 46). Hawthorne
continues to talk about the Wild Rosebush, and along with the Rosebush having a positive spin, but
also being able to have a meaning of sorrow and

The Pros And Cons Of Natural Evils
Good can come from evil
Evil is the extreme moral wickedness that results in the suffering of others. This can come in two
forms, physical evils and moral evils. Good is moral right that strengthens and brings joy to people.
One of the greatest evils of humanity was killing Jesus Christ the Son of God. However, this
resulted in one of the greatest goods in our world. Good Friday occurring meant that the world could
be saved from death. No matter the degree, I believe that all evil can result in some good.
Natural evils can result in solidarity amongst communities and love and support to those affected. A
natural evil is a tremendous suffering that wasn't inflicted by humans and was due to the nature of
our world. These include events such as natural disasters like Typhoon Haiyan and Ash Wednesday
Bushfires. This type of evil brings traumatic effects and devastate communities through loss of lives
and destruction. Typhoon Haiyan occurred in 2013 and caused a devastating 6,340 fatalities. The
Ash Wednesday Bushfires took place in 1983 causing 75 deaths and injuring thousands more.
After the terror of Typhoon Haiyan and Ash Wednesday, countless people around the globe shared
their love, aid and support to the affected. This is evident through volunteers helping relief activities
through programs like Caritas. People around the globe also donated resources. I personally
experienced the compassion given to the Philippines from Typhoon Haiyan. My parish and school
community

The Nature Of Evil In The Lottery And A Good Man Is Hard...
While there are many natures of evil throughout the world, the reoccurrence of social injustice
throughout previous generations have laid the foundation for many writers in the early twentieth
century. Authors Flannery O'Connor and Shirley Jackson grew up in the thick of racial diversity that
America was enduring. "The Lottery" and "A Good Man is Hard to Find" help exemplify the
importance of moral and natural evil and its effects on the world by using traditional and
untraditional forms of these immoral actions.
In "A Good Man is Hard to Find" there are two main characters who fit the description of evil.
Whether it is the pretentious grandmother or the unlawful Misfit, "O'Connor touches upon the
violence and grotesque" that she witnessed in her youth (O'Connor). The grandmother is a woman
who grew up during the times when racial diversity was more prevalent and clearly was brought up
by a successful family. A little sympathy could be shown towards the grandmother since most of the
narrative is through her eyes, but like The Misfit she has cruel intentions. The sophisticated lifestyle
she lived isolated her from all the harshness in the world and led to her to believe that her way is
always right. This is until The Misfit approaches her and his acquaintance takes the remaining
family to the woods to be murdered. The Misfit has his own internal logic leading him to believe he
is killing because that is what makes him happy, not because he is blood thirsty. In fact, he is

Moral Evil vs. Natural Evil Essay
Evil can be categorized into two forms, moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil is brought about by
bad choices that stem from our free will. Natural evil is bad things that happen to people, whether
they deserve them or not. The problem with evil is,
"Either we must say that God is not wholly good, and that he permits or is even the author of evil.
Or we must say that God is not omnipotent, and although he is wholly good and would prevent evil
if he could, he is powerless to stop it." (Fitzgerald 340).
This is a significant problem to the revealed religions because they believe in a wholly good and
omnipotent God. Why then, would this God allow evil? In this paper, I will provide, explain, and
evaluate St. Augustine of Hippo's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This would be similar to taking pieces out of a wooden wheel. The more slices that are removed, the
worse the wheel becomes, but it is still a wheel. Likewise a good person can become less good by
being corrupted, but he still exists as a person as long as there is some form of good left. This small
incorruptible good inside of us is like a piece of God in every living thing. Man can be corrupted
like this because we can make morally wrong choices that deprive us of good. This is due to our free
will. God created mankind with the ability to make choices based on our own wants; this is known
as free will. If free will did not exist, the world would be a very boring place. Imagine never being
able to make your own decisions. God did not want this so he gave us the power to think on our
own. We are rational beings and mostly make good decisions, but the bad decisions are what lead to
evil. Consciences act like a moral compass in our heads, trying to steer us away from the evil
choices and towards the good. Our consciences could be part of that small incorruptible good that is
inside of us. Sometimes a conscience is not enough to guide us, though, and evil choices stem from
our free will. Free

Are We Born Good or Evil Essay examples
Since the beginning of time, our mere existence has created a number of questions we cannot seem
to forget nor answer. Where did we come from? How was the universe created? What is our
purpose? Are we innately good or bad? Assumptions, theories, evidence, faith, and science have all
been used to try to answer these questions accurately. Specifically the question whether we are born
good or bad will be addressed. Locke says that we are born good with a blank slate. Whatever we
learn and how we learn it from society is what fills the slate. However Hobbes believes that we are
born bad and because of this we need a ruler to control that attribute with fear of punishment. I
believe that Hobbes is right in the sense that we are born ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The idea of killing someone never would have crossed the children's minds until the natural instinct
to survive replaced the want to do right. The children in sense became barbaric when they let their
natural instincts override their domestic upbringing. Also, just apply what we do from day to day as
humans. One day we will go out to eat have a lovely dinner, and though we are full, precede to a
dessert that is not needed. Comes number less ominous. When that woman with a model figure
dressed in BeBe walks by you grudgingly wish you were she. Hearing these inconsequential things,
you would think nothing of performing them from day to day. These sins do not necessarily strike
you as a good reason why we are innately born evil. Yet, according to the Bible gluttony lying, and
coveting are all sins. In which every sin is weighed the same. Looking at sin this way, we begin to
see how much we really do sin in a day. However, in order for that argument to have meaning to a
person, they would first have to believe in the truth behind the Bible. See this is where the argument
of society creating our out looks on right and wrong comes from. In earlier ages it was less heard of
to not trust the Bible as your source of right and wrong. Throwing out the Bible as the only source,
now a days we have seen the change in what is considered "acceptable" in sexuality and morals.
Society has said no to the Bible as

The Nature Of Human Nature In King Lear
Shakespeare's King Lear questions the inherent nature of human nature: is it good or bad?
Shakespeare argues that human nature, or general characteristics considered to be shared by all
humans, is driven by love, secrecy, betrayal, and ignorance. Therefore, Lear's story maintains that
human nature is evil and when one does do good it is often only because of a realization of the
malice of his or her human nature. Although there are a few purely good characters in Lear, they end
up being overcome by evil – by unjust banishment or violent death – and while in the end, order
restores itself, good has to first accept defeat by evil. Shakespeare uses the power and control of his
villains to stress the malevolence of human nature. The first force of wickedness that Lear examines
is love. Beginning with the first scene, the story shows how twisted and fake love can be when Lear
cannot recognize that his daughter, Cordelia, loves him the most. Cordelia tells him "I love you
according to my bond, no more nor less," and although the reader realizes this is the most honest
form of love, Lear dismisses it as inadequate and kicks his closest daughter out of his kingdom
(1.1.102). Lear doesn't understand that there is more to love than verbal expression, which shows the
philosophy of many of the evil characters in the play: that love only consists of loyalty and honesty.
Edmund, a source of evil in the play, says "it is his hand, my lord, but I hope his heart is not in the
contents," in reference to a fake letter in which his brother, Edgar, plots to kill their father (1.2.71).
This shows that he wants his father to believe love is equated with loyalty and honesty. While love
has a slightly different meaning for each character, it's obvious that Edmund doesn't really believe
that love means loyalty and honesty because later in the play he says "to both these sisters have I
sworn my love, each jealous of the other as the stung are of the adder," claiming he loves both
Regan and Goneril, while he still lies to each one about the other (5.1.63). Here, Edmund's natural
instinct to misinterpret love is what causes wickedness to form. Next, Shakespeare investigates the
corruption caused by honesty and secrecy. Most

Analysis Of The Article ' Rebellion '
Does God exists? If He does exist, why does he allow evil? Why doesn't He prevent bad things from
happening? Since the origin of the world many people have doubted their faiths. When it comes to
answering the question about God's existence people have been divided into three different groups;
theist, atheist, and agnostic. Theists are those who believe in God without doubting. Atheists do not
believe in God at all. Agnostics cannot make up their minds because they do not have enough
evidence from either side. In his article "Rebellion", F. Dostoevsky present Ivan who does not
understand the reasons for human sufferings and sacrifices in order to go to heaven after people
died. On the other hand, in his article "Why Does God ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Ivan believes that children are innocent and therefore they should not suffer aggression and torture
from adults. When aggression, maltreatment, and torture are done to children, there is where Ivan
might ask himself questions like, where is God?, why doesn't he interfer? Ivan said that he wants to
be present the day that Jesus come back to earth to judge dead and alive because he is curios and
therefore, he would like to know what are all the sacrifice of humans for. Ivan believes that Jesus
makes justice but, he can not simply understand why God doesn't have mercy of defenseless
children who are unreasonable torture. "I just most respectfully return him the ticket"( Ivan, 245).
According to religion we have to forgive our enemy as well as God forgives us. Ivan does not
support the idea that one must forgive the actions of someone who made us suffer. He uses the
example of a mother who saw her son been torn into pieces by the dog of the child tormentor. Ivan
claims that "if she wants to, let her forgive the tormentor her immeasurable maternal suffering; but
she has no right to forgive the suffering of her child who was torn into pieces"(Ivan, 245). Ivan
thinks that if the mother forgive the tormentor of her child, she would be paying an extremely high
price in order to satisfice God. He said that if it is the price he has to pay in order to go to God, then
he prefer not to pay it and give it

Good People Are Inherently Evil
While they are not necessarily evil – nor are they necessarily good – I believe humans are inherently
conceited in a way that makes them lean more towards doing evil than good. This manifests itself as
a fundamental need to exercise control over others and to raise one's own status. Classically evil
people express this need as a desire to be the most powerful, wealthy, and venerated person on
Earth, controlling large groups of followers and having them bend to his or her will. Meanwhile,
even people deemed the most selfless in charity and in love have an underlying selfish motivation to
their actions. Firstly, I have noted that individuals whom are almost universally recognized as the
most evil people in politics – totalitarian dictators like Hitler and Ghaddafi – ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Not to mention, of course, the boost in social status generous people enjoy. Next, my experiences
with helping others develop romantic relationships has taught me that the participants are ultimately
using their partners as a service to fulfil personal attention and affection needs rather than a duty to
fulfil their same needs. As always, the subconscious control appears in the concept of 'feeling
needed' which, as I have learned from evolutionary science publishings, was crucial to establishing
civilization. In a relationship, the evil logic is "if I leave my partner, s/he will never be as happy as
he/she was with me." Thus, even the most submissive partner can assert dominance over a human
like a boss–man over a yes–man. While my worldview is almost certainly skewed by an utter dearth
of perspective and experience, I conclude that all humans possess greater capacity for evil than

Lord Of The Flies : Evil : A Natural Desire?
Evil: A Natural Desire? Imagine a society where there are no rules or order. What would living there
be like? Would it be successful? In the novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding, a society
without stable rules and order is put to the ultimate test. Ralph and the other characters in the novel
put the importance of rules and order to the test when they are stranded on an island alone, without
adults, and without any of the structure of civilization they are accustomed to having in their day to
day lives. In the novel Lord of the Flies, Golding uses Ralph as a character to show that order and
structure are a necessity for a society to function properly; and that the Id can easily take over the
superego and return society to its primitive nature. Within a functional society rules are a key aspect
to allow for a thriving society. Lost on an island in the pacific it is up to the boys in Lord of the Flies
to create and maintain rules in an effort to establish a functioning society. Throughout the novel the
notion of rules are challenged by other characters, such as Jack, as they further remove themselves
from the last notions of society. This is seen in Ralph's response to Jack challenging his authority
and insistence on maintaining rules and order. Ralph continues to insist this, "Because the rules are
all we've got"(Golding 91). Ralph's constant reassurance on rules and order is what allowed him to
hold onto the aspects of society that shaped and taught him what is

Christian View Of Evil
Ask a person from any culture around the planet and they will say that evil has always plagued
humanity. However, when different people are asked to identify the source of evil found in their
culture, the answers will differ from one another, maybe even drastically. This is most likely due to
the varied experiences of their culture and faith traditions among other factors. Due to my lack of
knowledge about other various perspectives of evil found around the world, I strive to articulate
solely from my own Christian perspective.
To begin, I will discuss what I believe evil to be. Conceptually speaking, there are two forms of evil,
natural and moral. Natural evil consists of phenomena which occur due to natural sources within
creation. This form of evil includes weather disasters, cosmic barriers such as asteroids or collapsing
stars, planetary movements such as earthquakes and volcanoes, animal instincts such as viral
outbreaks or bear attacks (i.e. anything that drives self–preservation in the animal world), and so on.
Conceptually, natural evils are not affected by human involvement. In other words, these
phenomena would occur regardless if humanity existed in creation or not. Once an otherwise
naturally occurring phenomenon happens as a result of human behavior, i.e. global warming, it no
longer fits this form of evil, conceptually speaking. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This tradition is also problematic in a way similar to the source of natural evil. If God created
humanity with free–will than God is to blame for creating the potential for moral evil to occur. Some
theologians attempt to remedy this by connecting moral evil with salvation. In other words, they see
moral evil as the means to a salvific end, i.e. there is no reason to save the morally perfect, only the
morally evil. This persuasion does not settle my discomfort with moral evil, especially when the
experiences of others are

Essay on The Mayor of Casterbridge by Thomas Hardy
"The Mayor of Casterbridge"
In The Mayor of Casterbridge by Thomas Hardy, a person's future lies in the hands of his or her past
actions. The intelligent or ignorant decision that they make places an immediate or long–term effect
on the rest of person's life. Michael Henchard, whose interactions with the people of Casterbridge
lead to his demise, is only one of the people who decide their own destiny through their actions. The
decisions that the residents of Casterbridge make affect the rest of their lives. The good and evil
characteristics which society possesses determine their fate.
The good qualities which a human holds leads to their future happiness. Initially, a person who
understands their natural area results in a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Farfrae's superior reasoning skills and wit in his grain business and in his life deliver a most
luxurious future. A person's intellect basically results in an enjoyable life and future. Newson makes
up a plan that if Susan "thinks me dead she'll go back to him, and the child will have a
home" (285), this shows his love for Elizabeth–Jane and in turn guarantee him a good life. Yet
as the positive qualities of humans determine people's destiny, the negative attributes of people
decide their own fate.
As the good brings success, the evil characteristics of mankind insure a life of unhappiness and
suffering. People's natural desire to seek revenge causes their own demise. Jopp's obsession to force
Farfrae out of business was so strong that Jopp "was as unsafe a colleague as Henchard could
have chosen" (179). Henchard's own anger toward Farfrae for stealing Lucetta and initially
causing Henchard to lose his business leads to Henchard challenging Farfrae in a fight to ones death.
Henchard defeats Farfrae, but spares his life. Without doubt, irresponsibility causes painful
situations that people must deal with, Henchard's negligence to keep a close eye on his business
results in the bankruptcy of the business. This unruly and negative behavior by Henchard and Jopp
lead to both Jopp's unemployment and Henchard loss of everything in his life that was important to
him. Undeniably, the deceitfulness of humans' result in serious consequences, Susan's

Lord of the Flies by William Golding and the Philosophy of...
Rousseau and Golding are both philosophers and are both known for different similar topics.
Rousseau is known for his first book, A Discourse on the Sciences and Arts, about his philosophies
saying that man is good. Golding is known for his bestselling novel he ever wrote, Lord of The
Flies, also expressing his philosophies saying that man is evil. Rousseau and Golding have many
contrasts that fight against each other's philosophies but was never spoken to each other because
they lived in different time periods. My view on the spirit of a human without order is that humans
are all good even though some don't show it. Jean–Jacques Rousseau's philosophies were published
in 1762 to explain the good of man. His philosophies explained reasoning is what causes societies to
corrupt the good of man and humans are just naturally good by themselves. Also Rousseau's beliefs
show that humans are good physically and mentally also believes," modern man's enslavement to his
own needs was responsible for all sorts of societal ills,"
<http://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/rousseau/th emes.html>. All of his philosophies are based
of the ideas of modern philosophies saying that if humans didn't have a governments or societies,
what would their natural characteristics be and saying those characteristics are permanent and would
never change. So Rousseau took this philosophy and added on to it saying humans are good
naturally so the characteristic of being good is permanent and will never

Natural Evil Research Paper
"The existence of natural evil in the world makes it impossible to believe in a God who is all–loving
and all–powerful." Assess this view
The statement is basically saying that God is not omnipotent or omnibenevolent or he does not exist
for natural evil to occur however evil does exist therefore God must be evil, impotent or non–
existent.
The first response to this point of view is the free will defence. Most evil exists in the world because
we have the free will to create it and this does affect the world around us. The more we pollute our
world, the more it will destruct. This is because when God created us he did not desire for us to be
robotic, he wanted us to be free agents which is seen as more valuable than a world of robots.
Despite

The Existence Of Evil Lance Marrow Analysis
Evil is the act of intentionally effecting another person's life negatively. I have come to this
conclusion in my life because I feel the bad in my life that is the most difficult to recover from is the
kind caused by humans. We can not control natural disasters or diseases for the most part, they are
inevitable. These may devastate people's lives, but it is all simply the order of nature. Humans
though, can control their actions. When they hurt, they choose to do so. Their evil acts are never
inevitable or natural they are malicious and horrible.
Lance Marrow attempts to work out the complicated opinions and ideas on the concept of evil in his
scholarly essay. He begins by giving an overview of the evil that exists in the world right now, along
with questions on the existence of evil. Marrow then goes on to addressing the main definitions of
evil supported by stories that follow those definitions. Finally the essay concludes with the
questioning of the existence of evil in collaboration with God and on what the world would be
without the existence of evil. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The first definition or description of evil brought up is evil as a mystery. It explains how evil is not
scientific logic we can explain, rather we only can be sure of abstract ideas of it. Some of the
abstract ideas Marrow talks about include evil as dehumanizing, merciless, relentless, categorizing,
a disease, and charismatic. These descriptors all seem contrasting so it interests me how easily they
can all apply and make sense. Finally Marrow ties all of the thoughts together by stating that even
with all of these definitions the concept of evil is still confusing and "rounds back again into its
favored element, mystery. Seeing all of the different ways evil can be defined interests me because I
feel as though it is a perfect example of human curiosity and

Catherine Keller's Tehomic Perspective Natural Evil
The Negative–yet–Positive Ubiquity of Natural Evil in the Universe and God's Kenotic Presence in
Creation
With regard to the ubiquitous prevalence of pain, suffering, and death in the course of evolution,
Pecocke sees both positive and negative aspects of natural evil. The increase in complexity that led
to the emergence of consciousness was actually the consequence of the competition among species
for better survival in natural selection. In that vein, the increase of entropy contributed the
diversification of living organisms in the interplay of chance and law. For the emergence of higher
complexity natural evil is inevitable with both positive and negative aspects, and this leads Peacocke
to conceive a dual mode of divine ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Chaos theory engages with the certain physical systems, which are extremely sensitive to the
changes in initial conditions. The equations describing a system are highly interdependent.
Therefore, even a small change in the system can result in a large effect on the later condition of the
system. Since it is impossible to measure all the initial parameters exactly, the trajectory of the
system's operation is inherently indeterminate. That is, this theory is represented by the
interdependence among constituents of a system and the uncertainty of the possible conditions of its
stages of development. In the highly complex interrelatedness and indeterminacy, this cosmos
evolves as a self–organizing creation through "the interplay of chance and law." In that sense, as Ilya
Prigogine and Stuart Kauffman hold, our cosmos is in the continuous process of the emergence of
complexity and order in nonlinear systems at the edge of chaos. The dissipations and emergences of
complexity and order in nonlinear systems go on and on in this cosmos. "Every beginning is a
beginning–again."
The Entangled Universe as God's Creation in Keller's Tehomic Perspective In Keller's re–reading of
the creation narrative, the hermeneutical key is the fact the cosmos is in the constant process of
contingent self–organization. To be specific, "Tohu va bohu" in the first verse is literally translated
into "waste and

Moral Correctness And Its Effects On Society Essay
Societies have traditionally set up a system of laws that a culture learns to accept as the moral and
just norm. Cultures and societies then learn right and wrong from this system of laws and rules and
soon accept them as the moral truth. However, some individuals choose to side with innate morals
of emotions and of nature, rather than the learned system of moral 'truths'. These people would
believe that there is no such thing as inherent good and evil in the world, as defined by law, that
those labels are simply artificial constructs of their society. Right and wrong are so often determined
by the people who hold positions of authority: that is the way it has always been so how then can
anyone know the 'truth' of right and wrong or the 'truth' or morality? The world is, in fact, one big
moral 'grey area'; it cannot be carefully categorized into good and bad or good and evil as people
would like it to be. Moral correctness cannot be as simple a matter of obeying the laws and rules set
up by authority while ignoring one's emotional and natural code of ethics. This idea of good and evil
and of moral correctness is explored within Herman Melville's novella, Billy Budd, Sailor. Captain
Vere, who serves as the authority aboard the ship, Bellipotent, although believing he was upholding
the proper morals of the situation at hand, from the view of the laws upon his ship and under the
king and country he serves, made the morally wrong decision in sentencing Billy Budd, an ethically

Natural Instincts Or Evil Trap
Natural Instincts or Evil Trap
On the night of August 8, 1969, actress Sharon Tate, nine months pregnant, and four other people
were brutally murdered in her Hollywood home. One night later, Leno and Rosemary LaBianca
were murdered in their home nearby. By December the world knew that Charles Manson and some
of his followers were behind the killings. The question was why would they have murdered people
they did not know and in such a horrible way. The answer many gave was that Manson and his
followers were evil. From the classical Greek era to 18th century Scottish enlightenment to present
day, the nature of evil has been written about by numerous philosophers, such as Plato, Aristotle,
and St. Augustine, and psychoanalysts, such as Carl ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Sociopaths are begrudging and restful having been emotionally denied when young. They also do
not feel empathy or sympathy toward strangers but do toward those they care for and are loathe to
hurt those in their inner circle (Mountjoy). They are quick to display anger, nervousness and act out
in an inappropriate manner without regard to consequence. Sociopaths are deemed by some the
result of societal and environmental factors. Psychopaths are thought to be born with compromised
genetics and have negative temperament, poor judgment, lack social responsibility, guilt, anxiety
and shame and unlike sociopaths, have no empathy, sympathy or remorse often with family
members or those in their sphere of so–called love (Mountjoy). A society is capable of a variety of
people and everyone is living under different social status, living environment and conditions since
this society or people themselves. Some people have their own culture, some people have no
culture; some people have a high income, some low income; there are some people who are
physically strong, some people body weak; some people love art, some people love sports, and so
on. Thus, human constitutes a colorful society. In the case of Charles Manson, his childhood brought
to him an irreversible harm. Charles Manson was born Charles Milles Maddox on November 12,
1934, in Cincinnati, Ohio, to Kathleen Maddox, a 16–year–old girl who was both an

Are Humans Naturally Evil In Lord Of The Flies
People have questioned whether humans are naturally good but corrupted by society or humans are
naturally evil and the surrounding people keep them in line. Lord of the Flies is a book that
showcases humans are naturally evil. Little boys have been stuck on an island and while trying to
survive their natural ways of evil start to show. In "Lord of the Flies" William Golding showcases
throughout the book that humans are naturally evil, this allegation is supported by symbolism, plot
development, character development, and historical evidence. First, Golding uses symbolism to
show the reader that humans are naturally evil. "Maybe there is a beast... maybe it is only us." the
beast symbolizes the evil within the human race, the kids on ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Just like Jack Hitler found power when Germany was at its lowest point. Jack waited for the boys to
become tired of Ralph and his rules and then just like Hitler, Jack uses his charm to persuade the
littluns to become part of his group and work with him. Jack uses his traits of persuasion to make the
kids join him. The kids don't know that Jack wants them to be in his group because they are quite
clueless and don't realize Jack is deceiving them. Humans are and always have been naturally evil,
but what keeps us from showing our natural ways is society keeping us in check. In conclusion,
humans are naturally evil. Golding shows this in Lord of the Flies by using symbolization, plot
development, and character development. Humans are naturally evil when they are taken away from
any civilization and society this is when their inner "beast" comes out. The beast inside of them is
the devil in society. People have tried to answer whether humans are good or evil for a long time.
Lord of the Flies is a great way of showing that humans are naturally

Moral Evil Vs Natural Evil
There are many people who believe that God is all knowing, all–powerful and all loving. These
people never ask why is there so much evil in the world in fear of testing their faith to God. Moral
and natural evil are kinds of evil that we see in the world but have no explanation as to why God
would allow these to happen. J.L. Mackie claims that any explanation for how evil can exist with the
onmimax God has many faults and because of this the "omnimax" is only fictional. By defining and
identifying various amounts of evil in the world, an omnimax God is contradictory; characteristics
previously ascribed to God are not actually consistent.
Oxford Dictionary defines evil as "doing or tending to do harm". There are two very distinct types ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mackie claims that the existence of evil and the existence of an omnimax God are not compatible
therefore, an omnimax God cannot exists. He looks into solutions that might prove that these two
elements are compatible and dissects them into proving that they are faulty. He shows that the "good
cannot exist without evil" proposition fails that God is god of omnimax because it restricts Gods
power. If he cannot make something happened without doing something else, he is not all–powerful.
J.L Mackie takes possible solutions for the existence of God and presence of evil and shows how
characteristics ascribed to God are faulty. God is believed to be able to discard all evil if he attains
the omnimax characteristics. He does not do so in this world, which shows how evil and the
presence of omnimax god cannot exist

Human Nature And Savagery In William Golding's Lord Of The...
"Man is at bottom a wild and terrible animal. We know him only as what we call civilization has
tamed and trained him to be; hence we are alarmed by the occasional breaking out of his true nature.
But whenever the locks and chains of law and order are cast off, and anarchy comes in, he shows
himself for what he really is." – Arthur Schopenhauer
In today's world, human behaviours are driven by the civilization preset by society. In the rare
occasion that the civilization is taken away, humans unveil their true selves: animals with a savage
and evil nature. In 1954, after leaving the Royal Navy, William Golding wrote his story Lord of the
Flies, which focuses on a group of young boys stranded on an island after their plane crashed. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I thought, by myself'– The madness came into his eyes again.'I thought I might kill'" (51). This
quotation shows the change in character from innocent to savage. Jack, who started the story off as
simply a "selfish" British boy now has a "compulsion to kill". Jack's evil nature is starting to appear
and this nature is "swallowing him up". This connects to The Garden of Eden because in that story it
is shown that Adam and Eve start out innocent, but as time goes on their natural evil is released and
they sin by taking the apple from the tree. The allegory shown by Jack's action exhibits how this
story is an example of the unveiling of evil and savage when taken from civilization. The boy's
natural savage appears moments after they are released from civilization.
In Lord of The Flies, Golding also uses the characterization of Ralph to illustrate how the natural
savage is inescapable and that no matter one tries they can't change that. For a majority of the story
Ralph is seen as the most innocent and civilized. From the moment they arrive on the island, Ralph
spends a lot of time trying to keep order and stop the savage actions of Jack and his group. Though
he tries to stay completely innocent, even Ralph begins to reveal evil traits on the island. When the
hunters are on a violent man chase for Ralph around the island, Ralph fights back and "launche[s]
himself like a

Natural Evil
Short Essay on Hamartiology God created a world free of sin and where we could co–exist with
wild animals, the lion with the sheep eating side by side and with us, without fear. I want to start
form the beginning so we can understand how and when sin and evil entered the world. This
happened when man (Adam) sinned against God; Adam disobeyed God by eating the fruit that God
had said not to eat. There is way's to see this problem of what we call evil, not sin since sin is
against God. We can see in Job all the evil that came to him (it wasn't from God but God let it
happened) it was from Satan. Satan went in God's presence and God told him about how Job's
faithfulness towards Him, and Satan replied because you have blessed him stretch ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
I strongly belief that one should never try to dispute God. We should accept His will no matter the
circumstances just like Job. I believe God would not like that since through out the bible He teaches
us to obey His orders and not once He tells us to dispute not even to question Him. Word count:
#800 Bibliography Holy Bible NIV, Evangelical Dictionary of theology Walter A Elwell Theology
of Today Elmer L

The Problem Of Suffering Is Not Limited
The problem of suffering is not limited to human society. The awareness of evils, present not only in
human society but also in the physical and biological levels, is raised among scientists and
theologians who participate in theology–science dialogue. Not only animals but also plants
experience sufferings and pains to a certain extent. On the physical level, the increase of entropy
according to the 2nd law of thermodynamics is regarded as analogous to the notion of evil on the
physical level. Even though the prevalence of evil in the world raises a question as to the goodness
of a god in any religion, "The problem is particularly pressing for Abrahamic faiths that insist on
God's fairness, love, and goodness." In that vein, Veli–Matti Kärkkäinen appositely and acutely
points out, "Rampant suffering and acts of evil in the world, both in relation to humanity (moral
evil) and to nature (natural evil), constitute a major atheistic challenge concerning the existence of
God." In this paper, rather than presenting a full–scale theodicy, I engage with the problem of
theodicy through careful comparative study between Wolfhart Pannenberg's and Catherine Keller's
theodical arguments in the context of their dialogue with modern physics and biology. Pannenberg
sees that theology and natural science are to be placed in hypothetical consonance , whereas Keller
takes an assimilationist approach to theology–science dialogue. The divergence of their
interdisciplinary

Theme Of Imperfection In The Scarlet Letter
The Scarlet Letter
Nathaniel Hawthorne was an American author that lived in the 1800's. Hawthorne was also part of
the anti transcendentalism movement. Do to the fact that his great uncle was John Hathorne,
Hawthorne became somewhat obsessed with the Puritan time of the 1600's. This was a time period
in which as his books are written in, including his most famous The Scarlet Letter. In The Scarlet
Letter Hawthorne uses the symbolism of Pearl, Hester's Cabin, and Dimmesdale to contribute to the
overall theme of imperfection.
To begin, Hawthorne uses Pearl to contribute to the overall theme of imperfection. Pearl is the
beautiful daughter of Hester the main character, and Dimmesdale a minister. Even though Pearl is
beautiful she was born in prison as a child of adultery. As regular child would commonly be pure,
for they had just come from the hands of God, Pearl was more wicked as if she had been presented
by the devil to the hands of her mother because of her adultery. Hawthorne says, "God, as a direct
consequence of sin... had given her a lovely child..." (Hawthorne 81). This quote explains that Pearl
is a beautiful treasure that came from her mother's sinful act of adultery so she is imperfect. This is
just like how beautiful pearl that is made from the grinding together of sand inside of a dirty clam is
imperfect. As the story goes on it begins to talk about how Pearl is the living form of the A. Hester
says," She is my happiness!– She is my torture, none the less!"

The Existence Of Moral And Natural Evil
Theodicy is an attempt to address the existence of moral and natural evil with the perception of an
Omni–max god that encompasses three key properties; omnibenevolence all–good or all–loving,
omnipotence all–powerful, and omniscience all–knowing. High theology accepts that God does
exist in the universe as the greatest being of the Omnis, whereas low theology acknowledges the
existence of God without one of the key properties of the Omni–max god. The various defenses that
aim to solve the problem of evil that include the Soul–Making, Best of All Possible Worlds, and the
Free Will defense are not compatible with the existence of a Omni–max God. All three of these
defenses would have to surrender one or more of the key properties of an Omni–max god that is not
consistent with high theology. Low theology accepts that God has limitations to his powers in the
universe. In order to explain the existence of evil in the universe one or more of the Omni–
properties; omnibenevolent, omnipotent, or omniscient has to be surrendered that pertain to the high
theology belief system and the low theology should be acknowledged as the principal belief
structure. I argue that low theology is an acceptable conviction for the existence of God, because it
can solve the problem of evil by giving up one or more of the Omni–max God properties.
The Free Will defense states that God created a world in which humans could convey free will even
though he knew that evil would be produced from the actions

The Problem Of Evil In Richard Swinburne's Natural Evil
In Richard Swinburne's Natural Evil, he argues that the free will defense accounts for the existence
of evil. Following Swinburne's example, I will argue that the Problem of Evil does not give us good
reason to believe that an omnipotent, benevolent deity does not exist. To do so, I will first
summarize Epicurus' original question of the problem of evil. Then, I will defend my claim by
proposing the free will defense. Furthermore, I will discuss how the concepts of benevolence and
omnipotence are inconsistent with the definition of God according to the free will defense. Lastly, I
will address and respond to a possible objection to my argument. In David Hume's Dialogues
Concerning Natural Religion, he claims that "Epicurus's old question is yet unanswered." (Cahn, end
of page 958) The question he refers to are the following: "Is he willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is impotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing?
Whence then is evil?" (Cahn, end of page 958, beginning of page 959) The "he" specifies God.
Thus, the question can be translated to the following: God is good if he wants to prevent evil. If God
does not want to prevent evil, he is bad. If God can prevent evil, he is all powerful. If God cannot
prevent evil, he is not all powerful. Therefore, if God is both good and all powerful, then evil should
not exist. Furthermore, it concludes that because evil exists in the world, God is not both omnipotent
and

Argument Essay: Are People Naturally Good Or Evil?
The debate whether human is naturally good or bad has been argued for centuries. The debate
started hundreds of years ago and still is a big argument today. When the argument is really
dissected and looked at thoroughly correct answer is rather clear. Humans are naturally evil and the
evidence to support this claim is strong. People are greedy and perform evil acts to benefit
themselves. Laws are created to attempt to keep people in check, but they only work so well. Are
humans really as thoughtful and kind hearted as some people think? Mencius lived in a time where
Confucians were split on the question of human nature (Mencius 78). Some believed that people
were supposed to study their ancestors and take up their practices. Mencius comprehended this as
people were naturally good. On the other hand Tzu believed that people were inherently evil
because they needed rites to keep the people in check. Tzu believed that the rites restricted people
from going toward their natural disposition to be evil (Tzu 84). Much later in history Thomas
Hobbes and John Locke were still on opposing sides of this subject. Hobbes believed, like Mencius,
that humans naturally want power and that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
John Locke believes that most people keep their promises and are mostly good. Some people do
keep promises and do good in the world but it isn't natural. Yes, people do sometimes help others,
but there is a deeper reason for helping than helping just for the sake of helping. People that help
others benefit in some way. An example of my people would do good is for attention or to seem like
something they aren't. People want to appear like they are kind hearted but they always benefit from
getting some type of fame or praise for doing good. When people do god they have to sit back and
think about it first, it doesn't come first nature. Locke is correct in believing people do good, but it
isn't human's natural nature to do so and they don't do it just to do

Candide And Candide 's Attitude Towards Evil
Candide, ou l'optimism, is a picaresque style novel written by Voltaire and published in 1759. It
recounts the adventures and misfortunes of the eponymous Protagonist, as he lives by his mentor's
philosophy that we, as human beings, reside in 'le meilleur des mondes possibles'. This affirmation
has led to widespread interpretation of Candide as a response to 'le probleme du mal' , or the role of
God in the existence of evil. This concept sparked a great deal of curiosity amongst eighteenth
century enlightenment philosophers, who sought to rationalise the existence of evil in a world
created by an omnipotent and omnibenevolent God. Amongst these was Gottfried Wilhelm von
Leibniz, a German philosopher whose ideas regarding theodicy maintained that 'everything is for the
best' in this 'best of all possible worlds' and that evil exists in order to maintain a universal harmony
pre–determined by God. Voltaire's portrayal of Pangloss and Candide's attitude towards evil is
heavily based upon the Leibniz philosophy which justifies all forms of evil. Their empathetic
attitudes towards the presence of evil are relentless in the face of a wide variety of horrors such as
savage wars, rape, unwarranted executions and natural disasters. While this apparent justification of
evil is upheld in the majority of cases, Voltaire also offers alternative viewpoints towards the
existence of evil in order to further ridicule this outwardly empathetic stance. Furthermore, by
identifying the varying

The Lord of the Rings: Our Motivation in Committing Evil Acts
The following analysis deals with the nature and source of evil and whether, given our innate
motives and moral obligation, we willingly choose to succumb to our desires or are slaves of our
passion. From this argument, I intend to show that our human nature requires that we play into our
desires in order to affirm our free will. This is not to say that our desires are necessarily evil, but
quite the opposite. In some sense, whatever people actually want has some relative value to them,
and that all wanted things contain some good. But given that there are so many such goods and a
whole spectrum of varying arrangements among them, that there is no way we can conceive
anything as embodying an overall good just because it is to some ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Secondly, our actions are no more than effects of our prior desires, and changes result from some
pre–existing motives, thus preserving continuity in our personal identity. Thirdly, we cannot live
without some kind of morality, and every human culture functions with one. And fourthly, every
subject brought up by fantasy stems from reality.
The Argument:
Lord of the Rings conveys the longstanding struggle between good and evil and delves into its
relationship to the power of personal free choice. The novel by J.R.R. Tolkien has been brought to
life by the magic of computerized special effects as almost every element of the author's vision is
recreated in the film. Although Tolkien intended his reader to imagine through his words the fantasy
in which Lord of the Rings takes place, film allows us to hear and see more vividly the story, and
more importantly, "gives us the freedom to choose, to select one detail over another." As such,
whereas words are always the same in Tolkien's novel, the image on the screen changes continually
as we redirect our attention to different images each time we watch the film. Although, the film can
never be a substitute of the rich and complete experience of the novel, it complements it in ways that
we've anticipated for some time, and for Tolkien, would be unimaginable.
The story follows the journey of a hobbit, Frodo Baggins. When presented with the formidable task
of

Compare And Contrast Hyde And Frankenstein
Dantès is also shown to be similar to Frankenstein and Jekyll, in that the three are unable to escape
from their creations. Dantès and Jekyll are trapped more so than Frankenstein, as they are the same
person as their creations, whereas Frankenstein is trapped by being unable to bring himself to create
a female creature due to the effect it may have on society. Frankenstein's identity is called into
question here, as he becomes almost defined, in the Creature's eyes, as being unable to keep his
word. The Creature's words show a parallel between himself and Hyde and Frankenstein and Jekyll:
"You are my creator, but I am your master – obey!"
The verb "obey" causes the creator's identities to be reduced to that of slaves: Frankenstein is forced
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When Dantès is imprisoned, he loses his name, Hyde is known solely by his appearance, and the
Creature is never given a name. This contrasts with the socially accepted Monte Cristo, Henry Jekyll
and Victor Frankenstein. Their names allow them to be accepted by, not forgotten about, shunned, or
left incapable of joining, society. Unlike Hyde and Dantès, the Creature is never named. He is
constantly referred to as a "creature" and a "miserable fiend." This mainly comes through
Frankenstein's point of view, which suggests that the Creature's monstrousness stems from
Frankenstein's perceptions of him and the way he is originally presented to the reader. Had the novel
been written from his point of view, it can be suggested that the Creature would not be viewed as
such a monster by society, and readers would have more sympathy for him. The absence causes him
to be dehumanised in a similar way to Dantès, who is renamed "Number 34." Hyde, however, is
named, allowing Jekyll's view of his alter–ego being "natural and human" to be more accepted by
society. Hyde's naturalness can said to be due to his evilness as he represents the 'original sin' found
inside all of us. Dantès and the Creature are shunned by society when they are without a name
because they are distanced from society. Whilst Dantès' distance is literal as he has been taken away
from Marseille, the Creature's distance remains figurative – he follows Frankenstein and is in fact
very close to society. His distance stems from his hideousness and the absence of a name to
introduce himself by. He is left to forge his own identity which comes as an incredibly hard task.
Modern readers have felt sympathy for the Creature in his struggle to be accepted: Shelley's use of
his point of view in the novel aids this, however at the time of writing, readers generally viewed the
Creature as a

Lord Of The Flies Critical Analysis
What happens when people are separated from society? Some may think that the situation would be
fun and exciting since no laws holding them back. Others believe that the circumstance would be
chaotic and have catastrophic results. William Golding, believed in the latter point of view and
expresses this opinion in Lord of the Flies. Golding's novel Lord of the Flies, is the story of a group
of young boys who are stranded on an island with no adults after their plane crashed. The boys boys
must now establish a government and rules. Some of the boys also try to find help in order to get off
the island, while others are enjoying being all on their own. Although this seems like a fun
adventure, it is much more than that. In his critical review, E.L. Epstein states that Lord of the Flies
has "all of the characteristically twentieth–century methods of analysis of the human being and
human society and used this unified knowledge to comment on a 'test situation.'" The test situation
Epstein mentions shows how evil human beings can be. In his novel, Golding demonstrates how
humans act and behave once they are removed from civilization, and the results are pessimistic. In
Lord of the Flies, William Golding believes that all humans are born with a natural evil and society
prevents them from acting on this instinct.
Golding advances his idea of innate evil in Lord of the Flies through the use of archetypes. In the
beginning of the novel, Piggy and Ralph find each other soon after the

Natural Violence And Natural Evil In Lord Of The Flies
Natural Evil Within Us Violence is a behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or
kill someone or something. Everyone has some kind of natural violence in their minds even though
it is not shown on the outside. Every individual has the potential to let out their inner evil, and cause
some kind of violence as shown in the two stores. The theme of violence being natural is shown in
William Golding's novel Lord of the Flies. Set on an abandoned island, Golding shows readers how
a young boy named Jack uses violence as a way of entertaining himself while using power to
maintain his leadership. The story demonstrates these extremes by forcing young, civilized boys to
disjoint from their natural self. In addition, the topic of violence is also illustrated in Saki's short
story "Toys of Peace" by showing how violence can brain wash someone's mind, making it an
obsession. Taking place in a typical house, two young boys named Eric and Bertie have an
obsession and that is violence. Due to their behaviors, they are given civilized toys that were less
savage, and less violent. From their natural tendency, they convert these toys to something more
vicious. Through Jack's way of employing violence and Eric and Bertie's obsession to destruct,
Golding and Saki reveal that violence is a natural behavior, used as a way of entertainment and done
when no grownups are present.
Because of their need for violence, Jack's tribe and Bertie and Eric use of violence as a

Essay about Macbeth by William Shakespeare
Macbeth by William Shakespeare
As part of my GCSE English "Macbeth" coursework, I had to analyse how Lady Macbeth persuaded
Macbeth to murder Duncan, with a detailed reference to Act 1 Scenes 5, 6 and 7 and Act II scene 1.
Also, I needed to consider the events and themes of the play so far, the characters of Macbeth and
Lady Macbeth and the nature of their relationship.
At the beginning of Act 1 scene 5, Lady Macbeth is alone on stage with a letter, a letter from
Macbeth. The letter informs her of Macbeth's meeting with the witches and their report that reflects
there is more in them than mortal knowledge. Their greetings to him
"All hail, Macbeth! Hail to the thane of Glamis!
All ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Women are the gentle, loving comrades of their authoritative, powerful men. The traditional nature
of women would be of no help in the deed that was to be committed. Thus Lady Macbeth calls upon
the spirits of darkness to conquer her natural womanliness and fill her instead with the worst of
bitterness, wickedness and cruelty. She asks the powers of darkness to cover her thoughts and
overpower her, so that their may be no remorse, no natural feeling of regret or conscientiousness.
"Come you spiritsâ€¦..,unsex meâ€¦.fill meâ€¦..dirtiest cruelty; make thick my blood, stop up
th'access and passage to remorseâ€¦.come to my woman's breastâ€¦..milk for youâ€¦.murdering
ministersâ€¦..mischiefâ€¦..Come, thick nightâ€¦..dunnest smoke of hellâ€¦â€¦my keen knight see not
the wound it makesâ€¦.."
The nature of the call, its powerful language and vocabulary has a very strong, dark, shilling effect
on the reader. The suggestions of evil poison the reader.
The audience at these moments are reminded of the awful contrast this scene bears to the witches,
the evil looking, crooked faces, thunder and lightening, struggle and darkness. Clearly indicating the
play is a battle of the forces of good and evil.
Lady Macbeth says that Macbeth's thoughts are too apparent on his face. She advises him to be
double sided and two faced by deceiving the guests and hiding his real

Comparing Evil in Emerson, Hawthorne, and Melville Essay
Lionel Trilling once said, "A proper sense of evil is surely an attribute of a great writer." (98–99)
Although he made the remark in a different context, one would naturally associate Hawthorne and
Melville with the comment, while Emerson's might be one of the last names to mind. For the
modern reader, who is often in the habit of assuming that the most profound and incisive
apprehension of reality is a sense of tragedy, Emerson seems to have lost his grip. He has often been
charged with a lack of vision of evil and tragedy. Yeats, for example, felt that Whitman and Emerson
"have begun to seem superficial, precisely because they lack the Vision of Evil" (qtd. in Matthiessen
181).
There is no doubt that Emerson was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(1038)
There are Chaos and the Dark, but man can soar over them by "unfurling beautiful wings" and
become "an angel of wisdom." (Emerson, "American Scholar" 1083). It is a duty of Man Thinking
to guide men by "showing the facts amidst appearances" and accepting "poverty and solitude." He
can and should convert a mulberry leaf into satin and sometimes evil itself can be a guide for good;
"Drudgery, calamity, exasperation, want, are instructors in eloquence and wisdom." ("American
Scholar" 1082) Moral and natural evil appear in experience but they are not ultimate realities, only
relative and transitory.
But Emerson's belief and reality often clashed head–on with each other. Emerson knew the ideal
often exists only in thought and lived by and large only in the mind. In his later essay "Experience,"
his doubt is conveyed quite clearly. In this essay he wanted to reaffirm the hope of humanity and
presumably he didn't intend to express such a feeling as frustration, but it is certainly there. The
essay opens with a tone of bewilderment:
Where do we find ourselves? In a series of which we do not know the extremes, and believe that it
has none. We wake and find ourselves on a stair, there are stairs below us, which we seem to have
ascended; there are stairs above us, many a one, which go upward and out of sight. But the Genius
which according to the old belief stands at the door by which

Lord of the Flies (Human Nature Essay)
Human Nature in Lord of the Flies In the novel, Lord of the Flies, William Golding is able to use his
outstanding writing abilities utilizing metaphors, symbolism, and other literary devices to establish a
hidden message throughout the novel. The hidden message that Golding builds on is that there is a
natural evil inside every human being, which is suppressed in an organized society through laws,
rules, and punishment. The young boys in the novel are on an island all by themselves. There is no
punishment for their actions, therefore allowing that evil to come out of most of the boys. All
humans have an innate evil within them and that evil is brought out when there is a lack of
civilization and consequence as seen in Simon's murder, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, at one point in the novel, Roger throws rocks around Henry to scare him. "Round the
squatting child was the protection of parents and school and policemen and the law. Roger's arm was
conditioned by a civilization that knew nothing of him and was in ruins (Golding 65)." Back home,
Roger was punished for any bad behavior. On the island, without parents, nor adult supervision,
Roger is free to misbehave without any consequence. When Roger joins Jack's tribe, he has more
freedom, which led to his arm no longer being conditioned by civilization, rather through his own
will. Roger wanted to kill Piggy, not merely to scare him. This time Roger followed through with
the murder by throwing a boulder directly at Piggy's head, instead of around him. "The rock struck
Piggy a glancing blow from chin to knee; the conch exploded into a thousand white fragments and
ceased to exist. Piggy, saying nothing, with no time for even a grunt, travelled through the air
sideways from the rock, turning over as he went (200)." This ultimately led to Piggy's brutal death.
"His head opened and stuff came out and turned red. Piggy's arms and legs twitched a bit, like a
pig's after it has been killed (201)." Lastly, being in an uncivilized environment, without rules or
consequences, the innate evil is revealed once again when Jack and his tribe attack Ralph. At the
commencement of this book, it was one mighty group of young boys fighting for their survival and

The Most Serious Problems Facing Humankind

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Nina Vazquez

More from Nina Vazquez (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Most Serious Problems Facing Humankind