Nobel Acceptance

Nobel Acceptance
In William Faulkner's Nobel Acceptance speech he talks about how men and women singularly fear
one thing; death. He goes on to state that he wrote his texts so that the young populace might focus
on something other than the singular end to all living things, in hopes that the young men and
women would focus their attention back on the "problems of spirit" and not solely on the "physical
fear" that all humans endure of death. Faulkner uses his texts to bring to light that death is not the
only tragedy that can befall man. Through isolation, emotional conflict, and manipulation of human
emotion, Faulkner brings to life the human soul, and its legacy to the future, rather than focusing on
the inevitable outcome every person must ultimately face.
Darl represents isolation, lack of empathy, or even pity. Darl was a child born of hate, he knew no
love and therefore becomes the embodiment of isolationism that was a key component to the time
period in which the book was written. Fractured, broken Darl was Faulkner's personification of all
the injustice and hatred and pity people felt. Darl was one of the most outspoken characters in the
book but as a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He goes on to emphasize that humans have lost the sense of tragedy, true tragedy in the desire to
avoid fear. Compassion, sacrifice, pride, pity, honor, have been lost on the human race. Faulkers
basis for writing "As I Lay Dying" is to emphasize on these points, creating a true greek tragedy,
which causes one to doubt the sanity of his or her utmost desires and ambitions. Faulkner uses each
of his characters in "As I Lay Dying" as emphasis points of the human identity. Darl, DD, Cash,
Vardaman, even Anse, who should burn in the deepest pits of hell, represent a key component of
what Faulkner believed humans should be. By doing this humanity will "endure", it will flourish
and have meaning beyond the beset of animalistic instincts, lust, desire, and
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Rosalind Franklin and the Nobel Prize
In considering whether or not Rosalind Franklin should have been acknowledged, along with
Watson, Crick, and Wilkins, for the discovery of the double helix and awarded a Nobel Prize, one
must look what qualifies someone to win a Nobel Prize. In order for someone to be awarded the
Nobel Prize they must first meet the qualifications. The qualifications are endless, but somewhat
simple. In this case the Nobel Prize is for science. This prize is chosen by a group of people, and
they seek to choose people whom create different views of topics in the field they are studying. The
main candidate is consistently searching to find new ideas of the concerning topic, that could
enhance the knowledge that people already have on a problem or solution in the world. The Nobel
Committee sends persons who are believed to hold the qualifications of a Nobel Prize a form of
proposal. The candidates are not chosen at random, but are recommended by others who have
excelled in their field of work. The other nominations are not made public, but concealed for a
period of 50 years (NobelPrize.org).
Franklin should be awarded the prize because her work is both philosophical and instrumental.
Although it is hard to determine to what lengths Franklin contributed philosophically to Watson's
double helix discovery, it is apparent that she contributed immensely in the sense of instrumental
work. With out Franklin, Watson would not have the X–ray pictures that support the helical DNA
structure that he is

Analysis of William Faulkners Nobel Prrize of Literarure...
Caitlyn Buteaux
Mrs. Parham
English III AP 1st block
4 February 2013
Analysis of William Faulkner's Noble Prize of Literature Acceptance Speech William Faulkner was
an often misunderstood writer of many novels and short stories. ("William Faulkner's Nobel Prize
Acceptance Speech ") It was not until 1949 and after his death when he was given the Nobel Prize
in Literature that people began to acknowledge him and his works. ("William Faulkner") In his
Nobel Prize of Literature acceptance speech, at the city hall in Stockholm on December 10, 1950,
Faulkner uses a powerful tone and effective rhetorical devices to convey his purpose. In his Nobel
Prize of Literature acceptance speech, William Faulkner utilizes rhetorical devices such as ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This device helps him convey that people need to start writing about emotional conflicts with
themselves because that alone can make good writing. He also uses a metaphor to compare the
writing of something meaningful and important to something not when he states, "He writes not of
the heart but of the glands". This helps the effectiveness by comparing something major and
meaningful such as the heart to something less meaningful and pity as a gland. These were effective
by helping Faulkner relate to everyday situations and thing we are familiar in life therefore aiding
him in connecting with his audience.
Faulkner uses syntactical strategies throughout his speech to assist him in communicating his
message to his audience. In the third paragraph he emphasizes a syntax device known as anaphora,
when stating, "He must learn them again... He much teach himself... He writes not of love...He
writes not of the heart...".The anaphora helps Faulkner be effective in his argument by the repetition
of words to help him get his view of things across to the audience. To also succor his effectiveness
he uses polysyndeton, which is used to draw the audience's attention therefore adding the effect of
persistence and intensity to help keep his audiences attention, making his speech effective. An
example of polysyndeton is when he declares "love and honor and pity and pride and compassion
and sacrifice" This quote helps signify that authors need to write from their soul and

Rhetorical Analysis Of Alfred Nobel 's Speech
In his commencement speech in regards to winning a Nobel Peace Prize in 2007 alongside the
International Panel for Climate Change, concerned Albert Gore addresses the exacerbation of global
warming. Albert employs analogies, appeals to logos through cause and effect, metaphors, appeals
to ethos through biblical references in his speech. Through the utilization of these rhetorical devices,
Gore's clear purpose is to convince the audience that in order to repair and simultaneously prevent
the detrimental effects of global warming, worldwide cooperation –– through both political and
societal attitudes –– is vital for the sake of humanity, now and in time to come. Albert uses a formal
and suggestive tone throughout his speech. With the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Once again, it is the 11th hour". By analogizing the current brink of disaster to the 11th hour, Gore
shows the similarities of not only the situations, but how we must approach them. Now that
humanity is aware of the harmful effects of fossil fuel emissions, we must not feign ignorance
anymore and take action to make it through the 11th hour, like our successful predecessors –– also
showing that his methodology has a backing in history. In the utilization of his third analogy, Gore
relates the story of Cordell Hull, a man who won the Nobel Peace Prize because of his unification of
nations to deal with the crisis of fascism back during World War II, to his own: "Just as Hull's
generation found moral authority in rising to solve the world crisis caused by fascism, so can we
find our greatest opportunity in –– in rising to solve the climate crisis". Gore, being a Nobel Peace
Prize winner just as Cordell, follows a similar course of action that Cordell has in the past that was
successful; if we want to fix the climate, something must change in our current relations in order to
unify us to approach a common goal. In totality, by referencing historical anecdotes and relaying
their methodology used to resolve their plights, Gore assigns credibility to his preferred courses of
action to show that the outcome he wants to achieve is realistic and has been practical throughout
history. Correspondingly, Gore

William Faulkner's Nobel Prize Acceptance
In his Nobel Prize acceptance speech renowned author William Faulkner stresses the importance of
moving on and curing the human spirit. By using rhetoric Faulkner successfully gives hope to his
audience making them look on the bright side and reminding authors of their power. He proves that
if humanity does not move forward they will be stuck in the gefing pity of the past. William
Faulkner does a very good job at using pathos to show the importance of having hope when all hope
is lost. Making the point that humanity should not "live under a curse" (William Faulkner Nobel
prize Acceptance speech), the speaker reminds the audience of a time before the war. He makes the
claim that if humanity does not relearn and rebuild what was once there then the will be stuck in the
same old routine. By listening to his advice the audience starts to gain a sense of hope. Faulkner also
uses pathos when he says he refuses to believe that humanity is doomed; he gives them a message of
rehabilitation to endure and prevail. Not only is he giving hope but also he is using pathos to get the
audience to move forward. Throughout the speech he ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He uses his credibility as an author to influence others to work harder and help humanity move on.
He encourages them to write about better days and the hope that humanity still has. Speaking
directly to the poets and authors Faulkner states " It is his privilege to help man endure by lifting his
heart, by reminding him of the courage and honor and hope and pride and compassion and pity and
sacrifice which have been the glory of his past." Using ethos he emphasises the importance of poets
and how strong their connection really is with the rest of the world. Faulkner assures his audience
that the pain will be worth it and writing about hope will help people look forward. He proves that if
writer can make the first move then humanity will follow in becoming

Alfred Nobel Major Accomplishments
Alfred Nobel was a Swedish chemist who was born on October 21, 1833, in Stockholm Sweden. He
worked with his father in his arms factory; he was very experimental as a young man and went
experimenting with chemistry including explosives. In 1864 an explosion occurred went killing his
younger brother, this triggered him into inventing a safer more controlled explosive called the
dynamite. Alfred Nobel held over 355 different patents for different inventions that made a great
impacted still to this day. The dynamite is Alfred Nobel most famous accomplishments; including
the synthetic element nobelium was named after Alfred Nobel. The Nobel prizes each year that are
awarded are held in categories of physics, chemistry, medicine, literature and

The Nobel Prize for Literature: Argumentative Essay on Bob...
Dear Nobel Committee for Literature, The Nobel Prize for Literature was not rewarded to the
deserving writer. You have awarded Bob Dylan the Nobel Prize for Literature on October 13, 2016
degrading dedicated writers around the world. After dropping out of college in the 1960's to pursue
an occupation in which he was already well known as the times "most loved folk poet", he turned to
singing and writing rock–type songs with anti war messages. Whether he did "create new poetic
expressions within the great American tradition" he has not proven himself worthy of such a
significant award. Such a legendary award offered to many other brilliant writers, should be
received by someone who can and will continue to change the world. This award could help out
developing writers, developing countries, and should not be handed out single handedly. Newly
prospering authors and writers deserve as much a chance as anyone. As you may recall, a few of the
runner ups for the Nobel laureate were Adonis, Ngugi Wa Thiong'o, and Ko Un. All of these authors
shared unique talents in writing. In point of fact, Adonis, a Syrian essayist, translator, and poet,
experimented with essential elements in his poetry. He rebelled against the standard poets to say the
least, "I wanted to break the linearity of poetic text – to mess with it, if you will."
(poetryfoundation.org) He was not born into the wealthiest of families and found himself unable to
pay for education, yet he has pushed boundaries for many

Zanjeer: The Nobel Morality Prize
I am writing on behalf of Zanjeer to nominate them for the Nobel Morality Award. I believe that
Zanjeer should be awarded this because I think that even through his many tough experiences he
was still able to show morality through his acts. I am wanting for you to consider Zanjeer as a
possible nobel prize winner. I think that he deserves this prize because even though he had been
through hard times he still came out on top. Through these moments Zanjeer had to gain many
different character traits in order to do his best. Many of these traits had formed him into the dog
that he was, and even through all of the rough patches, he was able to help others who needed all of
the help they could get. One of the main character traits that he gained was courage. He was able to
go into the bombing area and was able to detect more than 3,329 kgs of the explosive RDX, also
known as Research Department Formula. He was also able to find 600 detonators, almost 249 hand
grenades and 6406 rounds of live ammunition. In this bombing 257 people ended up dying and
leaving 713 people injured. He found most explosives, but he wasn't able to get them all. Although
he could not find them all, he was able to help a lot by moving all of the explosives out that he
could. He also had to have a lot of determination and I believe that ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
I think that even though he is just a dog, he could still be a great example of a hardworking and
moral figure. I want you to consider Zanjeer as you nominate the winners. I believe that Zanjeer
would be the best winner for the Nobel Morality Award, and at the same time be remembered for his
legacy. He was a very hardworking dog, and even though Zanjeer is not with us, his mark was left
on the hearts of the people he helped saved. I want to have Zanjeer's hardwork and dedication be
able to inspire others, and to help with that you could consider Zanjeer for the winner of the Nobel
Morality

Alfred Nobel And The Nobel Peace Prize
When the word "peace" comes to mind, one usually thinks about tranquility or absent from violence
but when learning about Alfred Nobel, one learns that the products he invented were far from
"peaceful" in some eyes. The Nobel Peace Prize was created because Nobel left in his will that his
fortune was to be given as awards in the areas of: peace, chemistry, physiology, and literature.
Alfred Nobel himself started with nothing and ended with a large fortune, and as for The Nobel
Peace Prize, it has evolved over the last century into new ways no one saw occurring in the future.
Alfred Nobel was born into bankruptcy in 1833 to Immanual Nobel and Andriette Ahlsell.
According to Nils Ringertz, Alfred's father was eventually able to provide a "first–class" education
to his sons that taught them language, sciences, and literature. At the end of his academics, Nobel
was particularly fascinated with English literature and poetry. His father was not pleased by his
interests so he sent him overseas to study chemical engineering. In Paris, France, Nobel met and
worked with Ascanio Sobrero, the chemist who had discovered nitroglycerin [a highly explosive
substance]. Ringertz states that "Alfred Nobel became very interested in nitroglycerin and how it
could be put to practical use in construction work," with this new interest, Nobel took the chance
with the substance and worked with it for years. In his experiments with nitroglycerin, many
explosions occurred including one in 1864 that

The Nobel Science Challenge Of Malaria
CUNY Nobel Science Challenge Around 300–600 million people suffer from malaria each year, and
over one million people die from this disease every year, mostly children younger than five. This
disease is endemic to over 100 countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, and the
South Pacific, almost 40% of the world population. Malaria is caused by a parasite that is
transferred by the bite of an infected female Anopheles mosquito. The most deadly form of malaria
is known as Plasmodium falciparum because almost all deaths from malaria are caused by this
specific one. In addition to being the deadliest form of malaria, Plasmodium falciparum destroys red
blood cells along with causing complications with the kidneys, lungs, and brain. In more serious
cases, it can cause permanent neurological effects, and even death. As the Nobel Assembly said at
the announcement of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, "Diseases caused by parasites have
plagued humankind for a millennia and constitute a major global health problem. In particular,
parasitic diseases affect the world's poorest populations and represent a huge barrier to improving
human health and wellbeing". Youyou Tu, one of the winners of the prize, discovered Artemisinin, a
drug that has significantly reduced the mortality rates for patients suffering from malaria by killing
the malaria parasites an early stage of their development. The story on the creation of the drug
Artemisinin, is an interesting one.

Al Gore' Nobel Lecture
Al Gore, "Nobel Lecture on Global Warming"
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2007/gore–lecture_en.html Your Majesties,
Your Royal Highnesses, Honorable members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Excellencies,
Ladies and gentlemen. I have a purpose here today. It is a purpose I have tried to serve for many
years. I have prayed that God would show me a way to accomplish it. Sometimes, without warning,
the future knocks on our door with a precious and painful vision of what might be. One hundred and
nineteen years ago, a wealthy inventor read his own obituary, mistakenly published years before his
death. Wrongly believing the inventor had just died, a newspaper printed a harsh judgment of his
life's work, unfairly ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Major cities in North and South America, Asia and Australia are nearly out of water due to massive
droughts and melting glaciers. Desperate farmers are losing their livelihoods. Peoples in the frozen
Arctic and on low–lying Pacific islands are planning evacuations of places they have long called
home. Unprecedented wildfires have forced a half million people from their homes in one country
and caused a national emergency that almost brought down the government in another. Climate
refugees have migrated into areas already inhabited by people with different cultures, religions, and
traditions, increasing the potential for conflict. Stronger storms in the Pacific and Atlantic have
threatened whole cities. Millions have been displaced by massive flooding in South Asia, Mexico,
and 18 countries in Africa. As temperature extremes have increased, tens of thousands have lost
their lives. We are recklessly burning and clearing our forests and driving more and more species
into extinction. The very web of life on which we depend is being ripped and frayed. We never
intended to cause all this destruction, just as Alfred Nobel never intended that dynamite be used for
waging war. He had hoped his invention would promote human progress. We shared that same
worthy goal when we began burning massive quantities of coal, then oil and methane. Even in
Nobel's time, there were

Alfred Nobel: The Man behind the Prize. Essays
Alfred Nobel: The Man behind the Prize.
Alfred Nobel is known for starting the Nobel Prize. This prize is given every year to some of the
greatest minds in the world who through their work, help to better society. In opposition to the
improvement of society, is the fact that Nobel's other known inventions brought much death and
destruction to the world (Frost). This combination of inventions helps to pose the question who was
Alfred Nobel, and why did Nobel create this prize to help the world. In this paper I will find out
who was the man behind the inventions that brought so much death and destruction to the world. I
will also find out why he created this prize to have people work to better the planet and protect life
itself. Lastly ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Petersburg where he excelled in his studies, especially chemistry (Fant).
As Alfred Nobel grew into a young man he became well traveled, and consequently learned five
different languages fluently (Fant). In his spare time he wrote novels, poetry, and plays (Fant). As
Nobel got older, he started to help in his father's workshop. While working at the workshop Nobel
learned about and became fascinated by nitroglycerin (Frost). Nobel and his father became very
competitive in trying to find out who was better at creating a "massive explosion" (Frost). Young
Nobel finally won the competition with his father by using nitroglycerin to create a larger explosive
device (Frost). Afterwards, Alfred Nobel discovered how to utilize the power contained within the
nitroglycerin compound; however it was still a very volatile substance (Dynamite).
Nobel knew there was a huge potential for such an explosive but he needed to figure out a way to
make it safer. Nobel "worked 16 hours a day" to find out how to harness the power of this unstable
destructive substance (Dynamite). In 1864 a large amount of nitroglycerin exploded accidentally at
the factory where Nobel worked with the dangerous substance (Frost). Nobel's younger brother,
Emil, was killed in the accident. Determined to find a way to make this explosive safer to use,
Nobel returned to work the next day and worked day and night. Nobel never mentioned the accident
but did move his experiment to an offshore barge

Author of A Rose for Emily, William Faulkner's Nobel Prize...
All I have to say about A Rose for Emily is that she was a crazy person! Faulkner is a really worthy
and famous writer that has a lot to say in his writings and I think that he accomplishes that when he
writes. "On December 10, he delivered his acceptance speech to the academy in a voice so low and
rapid that few could make out what he was saying, but when his words were published in the
newspaper the following day, it was recognized for its brilliance; in later years, Faulkner's speech
would be lauded as the best speech ever given at a Nobel ceremony." (Padgett) When William
Faulkner gave his Nobel Acceptance Speech he had a quote in there and I think that he helped man
endure by lifting his heart in A Rose for Emily, he also shows how ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
There were a lot of different emotions that were represented in this selection, but Faulkner didn't tell
us that the characters were angry he used details to show us people's emotions. "Try to be better than
yourself. An artist is a creature driven by demons. He doesn't know why they choose him and he's
usually too busy to wonder why. He is completely amoral in that he will rob, borrow, beg, or steal
from anybody and everybody to get the work done." (Faulkner/Stein) When he talks he uses a lot of
emotion and that shows his style of writing. William Faulkner gave a Nobel Prize Acceptance
Speech and in it he wrote about A Rose for Emily he gives himself challenges when he writes and
one of the challenges is pity and sacrifice which has been the glory of the past. When he writes he is
saying that the people who have had pity thrown upon them and the people who have made their
sacrifices are the only ones who get the glory. "The human drama in Faulkner's novels is then built
on the model of the actual, historical drama extending over almost a century and a half." (Faulkner)
In A Rose for Emily this is shown when all of those people who left her life she didn't really make a
big deal out of it she kept to

Naipaul Does Not Deserve his Nobel Prize Essay
What makes an individual worthy of a Nobel Prize in a category as broad as literature? Is it an
immense knowledge of writing procedures that other authors have not begun to attempt to use? Or is
an appropriate representation of the author's subject that is solely objective, and lacks all personal
opinions? If that was the case, several Prizes should be taken away from some authors and handed
to other more deserving writers. V. S. Naipaul, who received a Nobel Prize in Literature for Miguel
Street, falls into the former category. Naipaul may have filled the technical requirements for a Nobel
Prize for his mastery of several difficult techniques, yet his writing neglects to explain the merits of
Trinidad while highlighting the negatives ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
What did Nobel actually mean by ideal? In fact, the history of the Literature Prize appears as a
series of attempts to interpret an imprecisely worded will.
A comparison with "Porgy and Bess" has been suggested. (C. Pierre) The parallel has at least the
merit of reminding us that the whole world is one. In that hospitable mood we might also remember
Mark Twain's tales of life on the Mississippi. But Miguel Street, in Trinidad, is not really very much
like Catfish Row, nor are reminders of nineteenth–century Missouri prevalent. What is true and, if
you will, significant about Mr. Naipaul's book is that it presents a world of its own excellently. Vivid
characters with tenuous means of support populate the place. They sing the latest Calypso songs and
interest themselves in cricket matches and collect junk and talk about migrating across the narrow
sea to Venezuela. If their attitude toward morals is informal it is shown openly, not covertly. Their
standards of courage are high. They speculate endlessly on the tremendous trifles and mysteries that
have troubled man's thinking throughout his tenure on our strange planet. A room with a view of a
mango tree may contain a boisterously quarrelsome family or a recluse devoted to carpentry or
scholarship. The popular beverage is rum, though the gay blades who enjoy it most turn to the
ostentatious patronage of a milk bar during an interval when joy through strength becomes
fashionable. It had so many

Squaws And Nobel Maidens
American Indians have been stereotyped in different forms of media for entertainment purposes for
centuries. The male stereotypes, such as the Nobel Savage, are widely known in literature. American
Indian women have also fallen victim to their own set of stereotypes. Two common labels regarding
American Indian women are Squaws, and Nobel Maidens. European–Americans have done their
best to pigeonhole American Indians into these stereotypes, however, American Indian women are
more complex than that. History dictates that these women had many roles in their respective tribes
to include prominent positions.
Since Europeans first arrived in the Americas in the late 1400s, they viewed American Indian
relationships through their own cultural biases. Women were observed working alongside men, each
contributing to the good of the tribe. Through the lens of cultural bias, Europeans immediately
labeled these women as slaves, who were no better than animals. The early settlers failed to
recognize that women were seen as equal to their male counterparts. Each sex had their own set of
tasks, but all tasks were valued without one out weighing another (Lajimodiere, 2013). The slave
stereotype continued to be perpetuated for centuries and became synonymous with the term Squaw.
It infected the way American Indian women were treated by white men not only in the media, but in
real life as well. In the media the Indian Squaw was routinely portrayed as a household servant, or a
hyper

Dr King Nobel Peace Prize Speech Sparknotes
Dr. King's Nobel Peace Prize Lecture was one of the most powerful reading assignments during my
first year in the United States. As an international student from Saudi Arabia, I never imagined that
one person could change the world. Dr. King believed in "non–violence" in order to obtain social
justice, racial integration, and civil rights. In essence, Dr. King's speech represented the progressive
nature of the United States and it motivated me to become a future leader in my home county, Saudi
Arabia.
Dr. Martin Luther King's Nobel Peace Prize speech is an academic piece of writing which
documents his beliefs on nonviolence over his career. It was my first experience with political
writing since this form of freedom of expression is illegal ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
King believed that violence is both impractical and immoral. King was an ordained Baptist minister,
who embraced the tenets of Christianity and wholeheartedly preached brotherhood, peace, and love
for all men–including white and blacks, alike. King believed "Violence as a way of achieving racial
justice is both impractical and immoral. I am not unmindful of the fact that violence often brings
about momentary results" (King, 1964, pg. 8). Subsequently, King did not believe in violence and
preached non–violence. King felt that nonviolence was the only means to fight oppression, racism,
and injustice. King preached tenets of universal love; moreover, King fought against despair, racial
separatism, and hate. King's message is extremely inspiring and speaks to be broad audience,
including residents of the Middle East. The equality of races can only be achieved through peaceful
arguments and demonstrations. For myself, nonviolence is the only legitimate weapon against
fighting social injustice. King's message could be interpreted and applied to any situation or
community. For myself, hate and revenge can be only be dominated through the application of
nonviolence. King also spoke about bringing about the end to war and poverty through collective

Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech
Al Gore's speech titled "Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech" is a powerful work of literature which
serves two purposes. The first purpose is stated in the title – to accept his award of the Nobel Peace
Prize. The second intent he had when writing the speech was to reiterate his points that awarded him
the honor in the first place. The speech explains his passion for the problem in our world that is the
climate change and how much we pollute our earth. To give a short gist of what his cause was, the
following quote offers much insight to the regretful aspect of our society that he is passionate about
fixing. He says "So today, we dumped another 70 million tons of global–warming pollution into the
thin shell of atmosphere surrounding our planet, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His call to actions is for us to "choose between two futures." He goes on to explain further by
challenging the reader to challenge assumption as well as repetition. Challenging us to question the
repetition that would eminently happen if we don't unify and majorly change our actions. His
persuasion is made very strong and hard–hitting when he says "we are standing at the most fateful
fork in that path. So I want to end as I began, with a vision of two futures – each a palpable
possibility – and with a prayer that we will see with vivid clarity the necessity of choosing between
those two futures, and the urgency of making the right choice now." Reading this quote gives the
feeling of being very inspired and feeling empowered. That being said, I feel Gore should have
given more concrete action that he proposes we take. He should have said things such as we should
stop allowing every person to drive a motor vehicle as much as they please. If he'd said something
along those lines, it puts a specific concern in mind and helps along the putting the reality of better,
healthier world into fruition. He also could have proposed that perhaps every person who owns a
vehicle be required to plant a tree once a year. His speech was powerful with lots of drawing of
parallels, a lot of analogies, and many accounts of making associations. While he is lacking a
concrete and specific remedy for our current situation, maybe it is okay. Perhaps all we need is to
see that we do have a choice in how we can influence the world, and the rest is up to us to draw
from the inspiration and coordinate our own, personal next move to attain the goal that has been

The Achievements Of The Nobel Peace Prize
Winning the Nobel Peace Prize is an amazing feat and accomplishments that very few people
receive. Only two US presidents, Theodore Roosevelt, and Barack Obama have received the award.
Roosevelt was the first ever American to win this award. His life story and eventful experiences
help shape him as the person we recognize as an impactful person in history.
Theodore Roosevelt was born on October 27th of 1858 into a Dutch family living in New York. As a
child, he struggled with his asthma. Many of his family members called him "Teddy", a name he
wasn't found of. However, that name latched on until people used his nickname to make a toy many
of us are familiar with, a Teddy Bear. His father, Theodore Roosevelt Sr., knew he was very
intelligent but thought he did not have the body to match. He told him to "make his body" by
exercising, so young Theodore did and became stronger. This led him to gain an interest in wrestling
and weightlifting. When Theodore became a teenager he also became interested in gymnastics and
continued to enjoy sports into his college years and beyond. Roosevelt went to Harvard College and
spent 4 years there. At Harvard, he studied natural science as his major at first, however when his
father died he switched his major to law. He excelled in sports and education and found a good
balance between the two. Roosevelt had an interesting and influential family that helped him be the
person we know starting with his first child. On February 12, 1884,

The 1981 Nobel Prize Of Physiology And Medicine
The 1981 Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine
In the year of 1981 three gentlemen were awarded The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
where the prize was divided and then shared amongst the three men. At the time of awarding, the
three gentlemen specialized in the field of neurophysiology while two also specialized in the field of
ocular physiology. One–half of the prize was awarded to Roger W. Sperry for his discoveries
involving the cerebral hemispheres whereas the other half was awarded and split between David H.
Hubel and Torsten N. Wiesel for their findings on the visual system. Therefore, together their
research altered how people originally thought the brain processed information by verifying how the
brain functions and why information is perceived in such a manner. The research conducted by
Roger W. Sperry began in the 1960's and dealt solely with the cerebrum. Before this time, society
only understood the left hemisphere of the brain to be dominant over the right hemisphere. In this
understanding, the cerebrum was composed of two halves, which were referred to as the
hemispheres. The cerebrum consisted of the two hemispheres and millions of nerve fibers that
allowed each hemisphere to distinguish what occurred in the other hemisphere. In the same sense, it
was understood that although both the left and right hemisphere were the same in structure, their
functions differed.
According to The Nobel Assembly at the Karolinska Institute press release, "Sperry has

William Faulkner's Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech and its...
William Faulkner's Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech and its Relevance
William Faulkner's Nobel Prize acceptance speech is a dynamic statement that challenges the writer
and man to not simply sit around and watch the end of man, but to help man endure and prevail.
Faulkner refuses to accept the naturalists theme that human beings are dominated, controlled, and
overwhelmed by their environment and nature. He does not accept the end of man, but rather says
that man will prevail. Though many have accepted the easy way out by saying man will simply
endure because one can hear his soft, inexhaustible voice even after death, Faulkner also refuses
this. He says man will not only endure, but he shall prevail or triumph over death. Man will ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Eliot. Eliot wrote about man's effort to transcend the force of time and man's effort to achieve the
timelessness of the eternal. His writings reflect his own personal themes and direction of his life: the
quest for eternal salvation. He believes one can "endure and prevail' as Faulkner does as evident in
"The Wasteland". "The Wasteland" emphasizes the decay of the western civilization, yet there was
hope and courage in the writings. Eliot joins William Faulkner in the argument that man controls his
own destiny.
Along with many other authors, Stephen Crane would disagree with Eliot and Faulkner on their
views because he was a naturalistic author. Crane saw human beings as wholly controlled by their
environment and their heredity. "The Open Boat" expresses Crane's naturalistic qualities showing
men having no control over their destiny as they are stuck in the ocean and are controlled by the sea.
Although Crane is seen as a naturalist writer, he is also seen as a Christian symbolist expressing
ultimate understanding of faith and the redemption of people.
Robert Frost, like Stephen Crane, also was a naturalist writer and would disagree with Faulkner. He
believed man had no free will and man would become the sum of your choices. Frost writes in
ordinary speech as Faulkner did in his Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech.
Like Frost and Crane, Eugene O'Neill also expressed a naturalistic point of view on his writings.
O'Neill's naturalistic

A Presentation Of A Swedish Man By Alfred Nobel
A Swedish man by the name of Alfred Nobel, is credited for designing the Nobel Prizes. This former
chemist, engineer, and inventor, known for being a technical genius, started giving these prizes in
1901. Alfred Nobel did this simply because he wanted to award and give back to those who had
done their best to benefit mankind in either one of the six categories; physics, chemistry, medicine,
literature, peace, or economic science.
Every year, on December 10th, there is a presentation speech on the laureates work and their
discovery. The presentation takes place after the King of Sweden hands the laureate their prize. The
prize awarded to the laureate consists of a medal, a personal diploma, and money. This yearly
tradition has been going on for over 100 years. It has been awarded 573 times to 900 different
people and organizations. Martin Luther King was 1 out of the 900 people who have been awarded a
Nobel Prize. Just like King, who specifically won a Nobel Peace Prize, Barack Obama, Jimmy
Carter, and Nelson Mandela are a few other laureates who have also had the pleasure of receiving
the same prize.
Martin Luther King, a negro leader during the civil rights movement, had one goal. His goal
consisted of ending racial justice and establishing a reign of freedom. King wanted to lead the
negroes in speaking out against the white race for the cruel punishment they received. On behalf all
negroes and their feelings, King finally thought it was time to speak up and share the

Ele Wiesel Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech
January 30, 1933 forever marks the beginning of the Holocaust, one of the most horrifying and cruel
events in the history of the world. It was the mass genocide of millions of innocent jews, gays,
Jehovah Witnesses, gypsies, and countless others. After the Holocaust, it is clear to society that we,
as people, cannot stand by and watch as other human beings suffer from cruel acts in which they
have no ability to defend themselves. In modern day, it seems as though ethnic cleansing is
becoming less common, however, there are still many instances of it occurring around the world. In
fact, the country of Myanmar is currently attempting to deprive its Rohingya citizens of their basic
rights and exterminate them from the population.
There were many things to be learned from the Holocaust, one of the most important including
apathy toward discrimination and ethnic cleansing. In Elie Wiesel's Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance
Speech about his experienced imprisonment in concentration camps, he explained that people "must
always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the
tormentor, never the tormented". According to Wiesel, someone who stands by and does nothing
while another person suffers is just as guilty as the offender. Additionally, he states in his speech
The Perils of Indifference that, "Indifference reduces the other to an abstraction". A lack of
compassion toward the victims of cruel treatment shows that they are of no concern. Prisoners

Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech Analysis
There is no denying conflict. Everyone faces conflict of some sort in their lives, whether it be an
argument over which sibling gets to sit in the front seat of the car on the way to school, or a
potentially dangerous confrontation that necessitates an immediate reaction. Writers such as Susan
Campbell Bartoletti and Elie Wiesel, who wrote "Hitler Youth: Growing Up in Hitler's Shadow" and
"Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech" respectively, portray such situations. Bartoletti writes about how
one German girl faced conflict during World War Two, and Wiesel shares his personal experience as
a Jew in a concentration camp. Both works show that the most important aspect of facing a conflict
is the way in which a person chooses to deal with it. One could react to conflict by becoming angry
or sullen, shouting or going silent, or simply pouting. None of these reactions are the best –– some
can even be counterproductive to one's goals. The best way to deal with conflict is to take a stand
for one's beliefs. First off, standing up for one's beliefs creates many positive effects, for large
groups of people as well as for the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Hitler Youth: Growing Up in Hitler's Shadow." Studysync: Reading & Writing Companion.
Sonoma, CA: BookheadEd Learning, LLC, 2015. 397–400. Print.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. "Underage Drinking." National Institutes of
Health. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, n.d. Web. 24 Apr. 2017.
Nobel Media. "Liu Xiaobo – Facts." Nobelprize.org. Nobelprize.org, n.d. Web. 24 Apr. 2017.
Town Hall Meetings. "What's New." Town Hall Meetings To Prevent Underage Drinking. Stop
Alcohol Abuse, 4 Feb. 2011. Web. 24 Apr. 2017.
Wiesel, Elie. "Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech." Studysync: Reading & Writing Companion.
Sonoma, CA: BookheadEd Learning, LLC, 2015. 416–18. Print.
WorkLife4You. Communication Skills for Healthy Relationships. N.p.: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Association, n.d.

Alfred Nobel : The Good Or Evil Contribution To Death
Your biggest fear just came true. Imagine seeing the one person you love, slowly and painfully
dying. As toxic gas fills the lungs of your loved one, he or she struggles and frantically gasps for air.
In a blank and cold stare, you see that the last thought he or she had was of you, before death takes
the last breathe. The death of your loved one is an unjustifiable death because we don't know what
caused their death. In 1866, a swedish chemist named Mr. Alfred Nobel, invented and perfected an
explosive detonator called dynamite! With the promise of building canals, drilling tunnels, blasting
rocks and building railroads, more quickly, the inventor also put the lives of millions of people at
risk on a global level. This invention created the perfect weapon for warfare. It was used to destroy
countries and for countless and merciless deaths. This invention left society to question whether it
was a good or evil contribution. This paper explores when and how did this discovery happen? What
were the pros and cons of this invention and lastly what was the outcome of this invention? In the
19th century, nitroglycerin proved to be extremely explosive and unpredictable when it was first
created. In 1866, Mr. Nobel, worked hard to stabilize and manufacture nitroglycerin at an industrial
scale. Alfred Nobel amazingly was able to chemically change nitroglycerin into a paste. This
chemical mixture produced dynamite and made it safer to handle. Mr. Nobel could add this paste
into

Alfred Nobel Essay 2
Informative Speech: Alfred Nobel Speech 1100 What would you say if one morning you wake up,
read by mistake your own obituary, and see what people think about you? How would you like to be
called:" the merchant of death, who built a fortune, by discovering new ways to mutilate and kill, is
dead". This happened to Alfred Nobel. The story is that when Alfred Nobel's brother died, a French
newspaper mistakenly published an obituary of Alfred. When he read this, he remained pained all of
his life. The purpose of my speech is to inform you who Alfred Nobel is. Although, I have not
known Alfred Nobel in person, by reading his biographies, along with my great interest in history of
inventors qualifies me to speak on this matter. Today ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Now that you know how Alfred Nobel became famous, I will tell you how the result of his
experiments along with the legacy he left behind affected our society. First, critics believe that
Alfred Nobel created his explosives for peace purposes only. His explosive substances were critical
to mining operations and communication systems, such as the construction of the railroads and
tunnels. Secondly, Alfred, himself said, "There is nothing in our world that can not be misused".
Thus, ballistite, recognized as one of Nobel's most disturbing inventions, revolutionized the
munitions industry. Moreover, three decades later, Krummel, one of his explosives factories became
the site of Germany's largest atomic reactor. In addition, the dynamite had its first use in 1870 when
the Franco–Prussian war broke out. At his death, in 1896, ninety factories of manufacturing
explosives and ammunition already existed. However, instead of all his "demonic devices" that he
created, Alfred never wanted to be remembered as the "merchant of death who kills and mutilate",
thereby he rewrote his will, creating the Nobel Peace Prize. Since 1902, every year in Sweden, the
Nobel prize is awarded for achievements in chemistry, physics, psychology, medicine or literature
and of peace. Today I had the pleasure to inform you about the life of Alfred Nobel, by also
mentioning

Nobel Prize Awarded to Randy W. Schekman, James E....
Each year, The Nobel Assembly in Karolinska Institutet distributes various Noble Prizes to
recipients who have demonstrated a monumental contribution to the sciences. In 2013, the 50
professors that constitute the Nobel Assembly awarded The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
to Randy W. Schekman, James E. Rothman, and Thomas C. Südhof for their contribution in
uncovering the details of vesicle transport within a cell. More specifically, these scientists have
elaborated on the knowledge of how cargo is delivered to the correct place within a eukaryotic cell
at the correct time.
The compartmentalized eukaryotic cell must retain the ability to ensure that correct vesicles are
shipped to the required destination at appropriate times. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In these mutant yeast cells, the typical vesicle transport system was abnormal, which allowed
detection of specific genes that were related to these mutations. These screenings eventually led to
the identification of twenty–three separate genes that could be classified into three groups based on
their effects on membranes involved in traffic. These membranes include the endoplasmic
reticulum, the Golgi Apparatus, and the plasma membrane (Novick and Schekman, 1979).
James Rothman dissected the transport mechanism by purifying and identifying proteins used in
transport. The NSF, SNAP and SNARE proteins act as docking sites to enable vesicles to fuse to
specific target membranes. This explains the precision of transport; the proteins only combined with
certain cargo. The ability to purify the NSF protein was made possible by the identification of the
VSV–G protein. The VSV–G protein is labeled by a sugar when it comes in contact with the Golgi
Apparatus, simplifying documentation. Genes code for proteins used in fusion, exemplified by how
the sec18 gene relates to NSF. Sec17 relates to the SNAP protein in a similar manner. The discovery
of the SNAP protein allowed for the revelation of SNARE proteins found in brain tissue. SNARE
proteins are a gateway to the fusion and docking of vesicles in a very specific manner: only an
exclusive number of target SNAREs (t–SNAREs) would bind to specific vesicle SNAREs, or v–
SNAREs

Impactful Use Of Figurative Language In Malala's Nobel...
Twenty–six whopping minutes. That's how long Malala Yousafzai's Nobel Prize speech was, and it
was jampacked full of rhetorical devices such as figurative language, repetition, and parallel
structure. You could go and watch it, but you'll get the same content from reading this paper, and it'll
take half of the time. There are many instances of figurative language that can be found within
Malala's speech, but I'm just going to highlight the ones that stuck out to me. One of the most
impactful uses of figurative language that I came across was a metaphor. In order to convey
determination to learn, she referenced her "thirst for education." I thought that this was very
impactful because it compares education to one of the basic necessities of life, water. Another great
use of figurative language within her speech was the use of symbolism. Throughout her speech,
Malala uses herself as a symbol for various issues that she cares about, but it's very evident when
she claims to be other girls that have had to fight for their rights. Malala uses ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Three times she says "so it becomes the last time" when referring to education deprivation. She does
this to ingrain the thought into our brains that if we take a stand, children will no longer have to
worry about education deprivation. As a result, the thought that more and more helpless children
will lose their rights to education if we don't decide to help them will be ingrained in our minds as
well. While talking about the same subject, Malala states that "it is not the time to pity them" twice
to emphasize the point that nothing will happen if we don't take actions to help the children.
Towards the end of her speech, she reveals that her goal is to see "every child in school." Twice
more, she repeats the phrase, "the last time," to show us that if we put all of our effort into achieving
her goal, we will never have to fight for education

Rhetorical Analysis Of Malala Yousafzai Nobel Peace Prize...
Malala Yousafzai Nobel Peace Prize Speech Analysis "I am those 66 million girls who are deprived
of education. And today I am not raising my voice, it is the voice of those 66 million girls." Malala
Yousafzai makes this statement in her speech to the Nobel Committee as the first Pakistani and, at
the age of sixteen, the youngest person to receive the Nobel Peace Prize Award. Malala was
unfortunately shot in the head by a member of the Taliban, due to the fact that she defied a culture
that did not allow girls to have an education. Despite her brush with death, she not only recovered,
but became a champion for the rights of children and girls around the world to receive an education.
Malala delivered a speech before the Nobel Committee ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Her use of pathos allows her to connect with the audience on an emotional level and helps drive
home her argument.
Additionally, her use of ethos allows her to present herself to t audience as a reliable figure by
saying, "some people call me the girl who was shot by the Taliban... some people call me a nobel
Laureate now." She convinces the audience of her credibility by reminding them of her personal
experience and that she stands as a credible source. Malala says that the award is not only for her,
but " the Nobel Peace Prize money [will be dedicated] to the Malala Fund", the official organization
led by Malala Yousafzai. She builds on personal examples from her life to support the issue, which
shows that she has first–hand experience with the problem and that she is dedicated to finding a
solution.
Together with strong appeals to pathos and ethos, she establishes the significance of this subject,
persuading the audience to listen to her call to action. She says "Dear sisters and brothers, dear
fellow children, we must work...not wait. Not just the politicians and the world leaders, we all need
to contribute. Me. You. We. It is our duty" (Malala). She reinforces her ideas and provides the
strength and seriousness that the topic deserves, while motivating the audience to unite and face this
issue. Furthermore, she says that

Thank Bob Dylan With The Nobel Prize
December 20, 2016
Dear Nobel Prize committee,
The Nobel Prize for Literature is an outstanding prize that honors extraordinary people for their
works in literature. It honors people that have changed literature. On October 13, 2016 you awarded
Bob Dylan with the Nobel Prize in Literature. This marks him as the first musician ever to win this
prize. Many people agree with your decision, while others are not delighted with this fact. I agree
with the committee to honoring Bob Dylan with the Nobel Prize in literature "for having created
new poetic expressions within the great American song tradition."
Bob Dylan was born as Robert Allen Zimmerman on May 24, 1941 in Duluth, Minnesota. While
growing up, Bob was influenced by Elvis Presley, Jerry Lee Lewis, and Little Richard. He was also
in a few bands while growing up. While he was in college he began performing folk and country
music at local cafes under the name Bob Dillon. In 1960, he dropped out of college and moved to
New York. In New York, Bob met his idol Woody Guthrie and visited him regularly and became
great friends with him. In 1961, he signed his first recording contract at Columbia Records and
became one of the most original influential voices in the history of American popular music.
Throughout his lifetime he 's been awarded with Grammy's, Academy and Golden Globe awards. In
2012, he received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Barack Obama. Bob Dylan
wrote music based on social issues, war and civil

Criteria For A Nobel Prize
Criteria for a Nobel Prize in Leadership Alan Weber (2009) wrote an article for the Washington
Post, that focused on the criteria that one might use to suggest a nominee. In his article, Weber
offered that candidacy for the prize should not be base upon "achievement broadly defined, or
abstract qualities that can be attributed to leaders, but clear and undeniable moral authority" (Weber,
2009, para.1). Cook (2009) added that he would choose a nominee "who has pretty much
transcended his or her own ego, and who sees humanity as interconnected in a vast system to which
we all, ultimately, are contributing"(Cook, 2009, para.4). While these points provide a good starting
point for selection the development of selection criteria, I have demined that any individual who
would be a candidate for a Nobel Prize in Pauline Leadership should be characterized by the
following the following:
Demonstrated Christ Centered Core Values
Unwavering Sense of Mission and Purpose
Alignment of Character, Ethics, and Actions (Bradberry & Greaves, 2012)
Servant Orientation
Leads by Example
Humility
Self Discipline (Lee, 2003)
Equipping or Developing Others (Lee, 2003)
Lasting Concern for the Broader Community
Influence and Impact
Explanation of the First Nobel Laureate As Lutheran Pastor, it should not be a surprise that I have
chosen the 16th Century Reformer Martin Luther as the first Nobel Laureate in Pauline Leadership.
Martin Luther was an Augustinian monk and priest,

Essay on Obama's Nobel Peace Prize
Obama's Nobel Peace Prize It was announced on October 9, 2009 that American President Barack
Obama is this year's recipient of the Nobel Prize for Peace. The Nobel Foundation states that Obama
was chosen "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation
between peoples." (Nobel Foundation) Controversy and debate ensued in the world wide media.
Critics have debated Obama's worthiness. Supporters have cited numerous examples of the current
U.S. Presidents' nobility. Obama does deserve this prestigious award. Nobel prizes are awarded for
Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature, Peace, and Economics. In his will, award
creator Alfred Nobel "specifically designated the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(MacDougall) Other notable past winners include the 2007 winners Al Gore and the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) "for their efforts to build up and disseminate
greater knowledge about man–made climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures
that are needed to counteract such change." In 2001 the United Nations and Kofi Annan shared the
award "for their work for a better organized and more peaceful world" and, in 1993 Nelson Mandela
and former South African President Frederik Willem de Klerk were each awarded half of the prize
"for their work for the peaceful termination of the apartheid regime, and for laying the foundations
for a new democratic South Africa" (Nobel Foundation) The question remains "What has the new
President actually done in a mere 10 months in office to put him in the same league as past laureates
such as Nelson Mandela and Mother Teresa?" (Savage) Savage cites four reasons the Nobel
Committee gave to defend their choice. "Obama's focus on strengthening international diplomacy
and supporting the United Nations, his "work for a world without nuclear weapons," his attention to
climate change, and his improvement of human rights. In each area, Obama has made a start."
(Savage) Obama supporters argue that "Beyond mere

Humorous Wedding Speech: The Nobel Peace Prize
Thank you. Thank you your Majesty, your Royal Highness, Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Thank you for this Nobel Peace Prize, a prize that was well fought for between me and my fellow
laureate, who is beside me today. I am here today, in Oslo, to accept this award, not for myself, but
for the global cause of environmental betterment. I accept this award on behalf of the people who
have fought to keep the earth green, and will continue to do so.
So far this year, 1.9 billion tons of waste have been dumped, 28.43 percent of coral reefs have
disappeared, 11.5 billion hectares of forests have been cut down or burned. 1.1 thousand species
have gone extinct. The year has not ended.
As we speak, mankind is engaged in a race against time ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Any person. I believe that if every one person were to use reusable bags, then the 8.9 million tons of
plastic will go down significantly. I believe that if people only purchased the amount of food they
consumed and did not waste food, then there would not be 6.5 tons of wasted fish.
I believe that people have the power to change, but we must we the one to encourage it, to play the
role of moderator to transition people to use more environmental friendly habits. This means a
global mobilization of peoples and organizations everywhere, working to educate and inform people
on global warming and their part in preventing this disaster.
Conservation is not a movement of the few, but a movement of the entire world population, of the
7.5 billion people that are alive today. I walk around and preach this message of safe consumerism,
but I know that I am only one person that, on the grand scale of the world, I am not much. But
together, all of us have the power to change everything.
Every day, I see people walking out of stores with their own bags, or people at the register declining
plastic bags. I see people who opt to ride bikes, walk, and take public transportation instead of
driving a personal vehicle. On a bigger scale, I see companies pushing for greener practices, aiming
to reduce their waste and use sustainable

The Importance Of Faulkner's Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance...
What defines a writer and their ability to deliver a message? Is it their level of eloquence? Or is it
the topic that they decided to dedicate their time to writing about? To simply answer, yes and yes.
Being a writer does require all of the above, but it necessitates something more. It requires the
passion and ardor that one has to bring into their writing. In a time of fear and anguish, most might
lose that passion that sparked in them, leaving behind a passionless and hopeless shell. In his Nobel
Peace Prize acceptance speech at the Nobel Banquet, these were the issues William Faulkner had to
address.
Using his platform for something greater, Faulkner delivered his speech, not only to accept his
award but to advise the future ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To the future generations of writers that Faulkner was speaking to, they would fulfill his wishes.
Over 50 years later, University of Chicago economist, Steven D. Levitt, and New York Times
journalist, Stephen J. Dubner, combined their knowledge and skills and created the book,
Freakonomics. The book follows an economist, Levitt, as he explores the "hidden side of
everything" and explains it all in a different, unconventional perspective. It takes on the topic of
morality and economics as he, along with Dubner, ask and answer many questions such as, which is
more dangerous, a gun or a swimming pool? What do schoolteachers and sumo wrestlers have in
common? Or why do drug dealers still live with their moms? As the reader can see, these questions
aren't the usual conventional ones. It takes on an unprecedented view as Levitt and Dubner research
and give a whole new perspective on how the world works.
As they answer these unconventional questions, it show the consideration, thoughtfulness, and
research that Levitt and Dubner went through in order to give the proper answer. Yet not only do
they give the answers but they give a thorough explanation as they navigate the readers through
their entire thinking process, showing the passion and deliberation that they put into making this
book. Consider the question that Levitt and Dubner asked in chapter five, which is more dangerous,
a gun or a swimming pool? Most

Does Bob Dylan Deserve The 2016 Nobel Prize?
On Thursday, October 13, 2016, Bob Dylan has been awarded the 2016 Nobel Prize in Literature.
Since then, it has been questioned whether or not he deserves this prize. Bob Dylan whose real
name is Robert Allen Zimmerman was raised in Duluth, Minnesota. He has been singing and has
been in bands since he was a teenager and has listened to songs from an even earlier age. He has
been given many awards for his songs and has grown a reputation. However, being awarded the
Nobel Prize had brought up a lot of arguments and questions on if Bob Dylan deserves it. The Nobel
Prize was created by Alfred Nobel who want to prizes to those who have done something incredible
in Physics, Chemistry, Medicine, Literature, Peace, and Economic Sciences. Winners ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Alfred Nobel wants "outstanding" literature from the Literature Prize winner which is stated in his
will, "...one part to the person who shall have produced in the field of literature the most outstanding
work in an ideal direction." Bob Dylan has created many outstanding songs which can be proven by
the awards he had won. Biography states some of the few awards, "The legendary singer–songwriter
has received Grammy, Academy and Golden Globe awards, as well as the Presidential Medal of
Freedom and the Nobel Prize for Literature." These prizes exhibit that Bob Dylan's work must be
very impressive to have won so many awards and it further supports the reason to give him another.
This also brings up the argument that Bob Dylan has too much spotlight and "real" literature writers
deserve. In the article "Why Bob Dylan Shouldn't Have Gotten The Nobel Prize" nytimes.com
states, "The legendary singer–songwriter has received Grammy, Academy and Golden Globe
awards, as well as the Presidential Medal of Freedom and the Nobel Prize for Literature...By
honoring a musical icon, the committee members may have wanted to bring new cultural currency
to the prize and make it feel relevant to a younger generation. But there are many ways they could
have accomplished this while still honoring a writer." This article is expressing that awarding a
writer would be more appropriate for the Nobel Prize and that Dylan has already won plenty of
awards. However, this would be saying that someone who is passionate and elaborate in their work
all time should not be recognized because someone else wants a chance. This is saying that a person
who gets 100 as their grade all the time should not be credit because someone who got a 90 deserves
a chance. In

Nobel Peace Prize Speech : Analysis Of Mother Teresa
Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech
Thousands of people struggling and were in poverty in India in the 70s, then a Catholic Nun named
Mother Teresa came to the rescue to fight poverty, abortion and comfort the dying in India,
specifically Calcutta. Mother Teresa, born Agnes Gonxha Bojaxhiu, was speaking in front of
hundreds if not thousands of people, giving her "Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech" in December
11, 1979 in Oslo, Norway. Mother Teresa received this prestigious award for her work, which she
give her everything to, also before receiving this award she also received numerous honour such as
Ramon Magsaysay Award and she also funded Missionaries of Charity. For all the works that she
done helping the poor in Calcutta, Catholic Church recognize her as "Saint Teresa of Calcutta". In
"Mother Teresa's Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech" by Mother Teresa, she used imagery,
polysyndeton and allusion to convince us of the importance of loving, sharing, giving and kindness.
Mother Teresa point out the importance of giving and kindness using imagery during her speech.
During the speech she talked about a man who was immobilize and smoking was his only
companion. She claims, "the other day I received 15 dollars from a man who was on his back for
twenty years, the only part that he can move is his right hand". Here we can see that even though the
15 dollars would've help the man with his cigarettes and he would've been happy for as long as it
last but instead he gave it to Mother Teresa because he knows that he wanted to help other people
too and giving the money to her made the man feels like he contributed in the poverty that Mother
Teresa is fighting. She also talk about how poor people can teach the rich and the fortunates. And
one day as continues on she talk about a woman who was dying and what the woman did and said to
Mother Teresa completely surprise her. She states, " I put her in bed and there was such a beautiful
smile on her face. She took hold of my hand, as she said one word only: Thank you and she died."
The source of her smile and words even as she died was the love that Mother Teresa had shown her
thus showing us the importance of love. Though both the man and the woman suffer a lot, Mother

Alfred Nobel : A Man Of His Life
Alfred Nobel was born in Stockholm, Sweden on October 21, 1833. He was one of eight children,
where he was the fourth of them all. Although he was often very sick as he was growing up, that did
not stop him from learning about all of the wonders of life. He was quite a bright child who was
very energetic and eager to learn. He had many accomplishments, such as his creation of dynamite
and the Nobel Prize. He lived a long life, a life of heart problems, but he continued to live his life
day by day. He was forced to leave his hometown due to the fact of dynamite being unsafe to
handle, but he made a living no matter what, leaving him to be one of the wealthiest men alive
during this time. Alfred Nobel was a man of his word, a man who would ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Although Alfred was mainly interested in chemistry and physics, his father Immanuel did like the
fact that Alfred was interested in poetry. He sent his son off to school to learn more about chemical
engineering since that is what he enjoyed most. By the young age of seventeen, Alfred was able to
speak fluently in five different languages which included French, German, English, Russian and his
own native language of Swedish.
While in Russia, Nobel began to travel to several different places around the world for his studies
and worked at several world–renowned laboratories. During the two year time period that Alfred
had been out studying chemical engineering, he traveled to Germany, France, back to his hometown
and even to the United States. Traveling to Paris, France is where he found to be home and he
genuinely liked it there the best. In Paris, he had the chance to work in the private laboratory of
Professor T.J. Pelouze who was a famous chemist. While in Paris he also met an Italian chemist
Ascanio Sobrero whom three years earlier had invented nitroglycerin which is a highly explosive
liquid. This was created when he mixed together three very unique substances, glycerin, sulfuric
acid, and nitric acid leaving him with a substance called nitroglycerin. Alfred Nobel became
interested in nitroglycerin after meeting Ascanio Sobrero, and he was curious how it could be put to
good use in the construction

Nobel Prize Research Paper
Nobel Prize
In this paper I am going to discuss the Nobel Prize. Firstly I will inform you of the history of the
prize, secondly its origin, and how it is awarded today. After that I will discuss the 2010 Nobel Prize
for Medicine, 1901 Nobel Prize for Physics, and the 1930 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.
Alfred Nobel
The Nobel Prize was named after a Swedish inventor and industrialist, Alfred Bernhard Nobel.
Alfred Nobel was born in Stockholm, Sweden on October 21, 1833. He was born into a wealthy
family, although due to the misfortune of losing building materials on sunken barges, Immanuel
Nobel, Alfred's father, was forced into bankruptcy the same year Alfred was born. In 1842 the
family moved to St. Petersburg, Russia. Alfred ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although he started working on IVF in the 1950s it took him about 30 years to make it successful,
and about 60 years until he won the Nobel Prize. Edwards is a professor at the University of
Cambridge England, he also founded Bourn Hall, the first IVF center. Today, vitro fertilization is
responsible for over 4 million births worldwide. Edwards discovered that an embryo can be
fertilized in a Petri dish in a laboratory ((4)
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2010/adv.html). The steps of IVF are started
by prescribing a fertility medication to control the timing of the eggs release. They monitor the
ovaries using ultrasound to make sure the multiple eggs can be collected and that they are
developing the eggs properly and that his is called ovulation induction. To retrieve the eggs a minor
operation is required, sedation and anesthesia is used to prevent discomfort. A hollow needle is
inserted through the pelvic cavity into the ovary to collect the eggs. Now the sperm is needed for
completion of the procedure, this is collected by ejaculation. The process of insemination now
begins; a single sperm is injected into the egg for fertilization. The egg is monitored to make sure
cell division is achieved. It is now considered an embryo after it is fertilized. Three days after the
egg is retrieved from the ovary, and fertilization is achieved then it is inserted into the women's
uterus. The two to four cell embryos is placed

How Did Takaaki Kajita Got The Nobel Physics Prize
There's the Nobel peace prize, There's the Nobel Chemistry Prize, There's even a Nobel Philosophy
Prize. But there's also a Nobel Physics prize, In 2015 A man named Takaaki Kajita won that prize
with Arthur B. McDonald. Ever since 1901 people have been able to win a Nobel Physics prize and
only 111 people have ever won one! You must be thinking, How did Takaaki Kajita get his hands on
one? Well, it's clearly Not easy he was 55 when he got it! Well In this essay Not only are you gonna
learn just exactly how Takaaki Kajita got the Nobel Physics prize but about his background in the
process to.
Takaaki Kajita was born on March 9th, 1959, in the city of "Higashimatsuyama" Which is located in
Japan. Ever since Takaaki Kajita was a child he'd been ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Each person shares the award with someone else so The award has been given 111 times. Out of the
population of 7.442 billion people in this world, Mr.Kajita won the award with Arthur B. Mcdonald.
Two people surpassed everyone else in physics in 2015! That's crazy, right? He received it for his
discovery of Neutrino oscillation. So He's been awarded Three times for his discovery of Neutrino
Oscillation. Looks like it's a big deal right? So they contribution that Takaaki Kajita made was
discovering that neutrinos weigh something more than nothing. So before 2015 Everyone had
believed they weighed nothing whatsoever, But until Takaaki Kajita and Arthur B. Mcdonald came
along they changed all branches of physics of and science forever. During the award ceremony,
Takaaki Kajita's wife and daughter were there. The Nobel committee said the discovery had
"changed our understanding of the innermost workings of matter and can prove crucial to our view
of the

Why Carter Center Won The Nobel Peace Prize
Nobel Peace Prize What would you do if your entire nation is being ravaged by a disease that you
don't know how to treat? That's where The Carter Center stepped in to aid struggling families in
Africa. Led by former president Jimmy Carter and his wife, they were able to bring cures to villages
that have none. Some people may say that the Carters just want to gain media attention but I will
prove that is not the case. The purpose of this essay is to show why I believe the Carter Center
should be awarded the "Nobel Peace Prize."
The first reason why The Carter Center should win the Nobel Peace prize is they assist people in
thousands of villages with diseases that don't have a cure in their country. The biggest epidemic that
the Carter Center was involved in was the Guinea worm disease. In just one years' time the Center
reduced the disease by a whopping 99 percent! That number decreased from 3.5 million to less then
11,000. Since the Center has many people to help throughout the world, they teach the people who
are at the center of the disease to cure it themselves. To do this, the Carter Center train volunteers
within the thousands of villages who are the main reason the diseases are cured. However, this not
the only reason the Carter Center should win the "Nobel Peace Prize." ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
To cure Guinea worm they took an extremely low–tech approach. One of the main ways they
stopped the disease was to keep people from drinking contaminated water. They built wells, treated
water to kill fleas, and also filtered water. The simplest way they destroyed the disease was by
handing out pipe filters. Pipe filters are small portable water purification plants that look like a piece
of jewelry. It has a fine screen at the bottom that filters out fleas making any water source safe to
drink. What more could they have done to help those

Nobel Acceptance

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Angie Brown

More from Angie Brown (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Nobel Acceptance