The lie of the UNESCO education program in the United States. The un-humanism, ideology of the leaders, eugenics to remove undesirables, propagandizing the young and creating generations of collectivist, ignorant and Environmentally confused children. The three legs of the stool creating our today, and the future of dystopia. Not what American Parents expected as education. Uncivil Society, destroying individual, family religion, to create slavery of another kind, mental.
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
UNESCO : the UN Education deceit: Intentional mis-education & dis-education : pdf
1. UNESCO
1946 - 1948
Sir Julian Huxley -First Director-General declares the philosophy of
UNESCO:
The general philosophy of UNESCO should be a scientific world humanism,
global in extent, and evolutionary in background.
So
Who is Sir Julian Huxley
His Ideology
his Friends & collaborators
1
2. UNESCO
THE ROLE OF SIR JULIAN HUXLEY
One of the conceptual grand strategists of this process was a man named Julian Sorrel
Huxley (1887-1975). Celebrated as a biologist, and social reformer, Julian was a devout life-long
member of the British Eugenics Society serving alongside John Maynard Keynes as secretary and
later as its president.
Julian was a busy man, who along with his brother Aldous, worked hard to fill the very large shoes of
their grandfather Thomas (aka: Darwin’s bulldog). While simultaneously managing the post-WW2
eugenics movement, Julian found himself setting into motion the modern environmental movement as
founder of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature in 1948, co-founding the World
Wildlife Fund in 1961, created the term “transhumanism” and also founding an immensely influential
United Nations body called UNESCO (abbreviated for the United Nations Education, Science and
Cultural Organization) in 1946 which he ran as Director General from 1946-1948.
The mandate for the new organization was set out clearly in Huxley’s
1946 UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy:
2
3. UNESCO
The moral for UNESCO is clear
“The moral for UNESCO is clear. The task laid upon it of promoting peace and
security can never be wholly realized through the means assigned to it- education,
science and culture. It must envisage some form of world “political” unity, whether
through a single world government or otherwise, as the only certain means of
avoiding war… in its educational programme it can stress the ultimate need for a
world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer
of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization.”
T
o what end would this “world political unity” be aimed? Several pages later,
Huxley’s vision is laid out in all of its twisted detail:
3
4. UNESCO
4
dys·gen·ic | disˈjenik |
adjective: exerting a detrimental effect on later generations through the inheritance of undesirable
characteristics: dysgenic breeding.
Huxley cont: “At the moment, it is probable that the indirect effect of civilization is dysgenic instead of
eugenic, and in any case it seems likely that the dead weight of genetic stupidity, physical weakness,
mental instability and disease proneness, which already exist in the human species will prove too great a
burden for real progress to be achieved. Thus even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic
policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO
to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and that the public mind is informed
of the issues at stake so that much that is now unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
eu·gen·ics | yo ͞
oˈjeniks |
plural noun [treated as singular ]
the study of how to arrange reproduction within a human population to increase the
occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable. Developed largely by Sir
Francis Galton as a method of improving the human race, eugenics was increasingly
discredited as unscientific and racially biased during the 20th century, especially after
the adoption of its doctrines by the Nazis in order to justify their treatment of Jews,
disabled people, and other minority groups.
5. UNESCO
A WORD ON TAVISTOCK
Huxley also worked very closely with London’s T
avistock Clinic that received funding from both
Rockefeller and Macy Foundations throughout the 1930s-1950s.
Led by a psychiatrist named Brigadier General John Rawlings Rees, T
avistock can be best understood as
the “psychiatric branch of the British Empire” established in 1921 which innovated psychiatric techniques
using mixtures of Pavlovian behaviorism and Freudian theories to influence group behavior in a variety of
ways.
Early on, the clinic explored the extreme mental conditions of shell shock victims who suffered cases of
psychological deconstruction during the terrors of trench warfare recognizing the high degree of
malleability in these subjects. As outlined by a brilliant 1996 EIR report by L. Wolfe, the idea behind
T
avistock’s was always driven by a goal to figure out how the brain might be “depatterned” and
deconstructed in order to be reconstructed anew like a blank slate with the hopes that this insight into
individuals might be replicated later among broader social groups, and even whole nations. Many parts of
this research was applied in the form of MK Ultra within the USA.
5
6. UNESCO
G. BROCK CHISHOLM: TAVISTOCKIAN CZAR OF WORLD HEAL
TH
One prominent psychiatrist who spent years working with Rees at T
avistock was a Canadian
named G. Brock Chisholm.
In 1948, Chisholm founded a UN-affiliated body called the World Health Organization (WHO) with the aim of promoting mental
and physical health of the world. A noble endeavor carrying much responsibility and power requiring a leader with exceptional
insight into the nature of sickness and health. Sadly, based upon his own sick views of the nature of mankind and society,
Chisholm was certainly the wrong man for the job.
Among the greatest causes of war and mental sickness in Chisholm’s mind were not to be found in imperialism or economic
injustice, but rather in society’s belief in right and wrong. Writing in 1946 Chisholm laid out the purpose of “good” psychotherapy
and education saying: “the reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong which has been the
basis of child training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for faith in the certainties of old people- these are the
belated objectives of practically all effective psychotherapy”.
But it wasn’t simply the “concept of right and wrong” or “faith in the certainties of old people” which had to be eradicated, but
monotheistic religion, family, and patriotism. Speaking eight years later, Chisholm said:
“T
o achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their
individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism and religious dogmas”.
6
7. UNESCO & WHO
THE WORLD GOES MENTAL
Once UNESCO and the WHO were firmly in place, a third organization was created to drive the funding, and
the practice of global mental health.
As outlined by historian Anton Chaitkin, funded primarily by the Macy Foundation, the World Federation of
Mental Health (WFMH) was created in 1948. The Macy Foundation itself which was created in 1930 under the
leadership of General Marlborough Churchill (cousin to Winston) who had been in charge of covert military
intelligence from 1919-1929 in the form of the “Black Chamber”. His new foundation was a part of the
Rockefeller machine and used as a conduit to pour money into “health sciences” with a focus on eugenics.
The US technical coordinator to the conference that created the WFMH made the new organization’s origins
clearly known. Nina Ridnour wrote “the World Federation for Mental Health… had been created upon the
recommendation of the United Nations World Health Organization and UNESCO because they needed a
non-governmental mental health organization with which they could cooperate.”
And just who would become the first Director General of the WFMH?
While still acting as the head of London’s T
avistock Clinic, Brigadier General John Rawlings Rees was put in
charge of the new body by none other than arch-racist Montague Norman (head of the Bank of England)
who had created the operation out of his National Association for Mental Health run out of his London
Thorpe Lodge home.
7
8. UNESCO & WHO
Once UNESCO and the WHO were firmly in place-
a third organization was created to drive the funding, and the practice of global mental health.
Describing this strategic battle plan to reform society, Rees said:
“If we prepare to come out into the open and to attack the social and national problems of our
day, then we must have the shock troops, and these cannot be provided by psychiatry based
wholly in institutions. We must have mobile teams of psychiatrists who are free to move around
and make contacts with the local area.”
The idea of mobile teams of psychiatric shock troops was an idea advanced by leading grand
strategist Lord Bertrand Russell who had written in 1952’s “Impact of Science on Society”:
I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology…. Its
importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda.
Of these the most influential is what is called “education.” Religion plays a part, though a
diminishing one; the press, the cinema, and the radio play an increasing part…. It may be
hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the
patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment.” The
third leg of the stool was the World Federation of Mental Health
8
9. UNESCO - WHO - WFMH
THE BI-POLAR COLD WAR AND A NEW GLOBAL
PARADIGM
Over the coming years, UNESCO, the WHO and now WFMH
worked in tandem to coordinate hundreds of influential sub organizations, universities,
research labs, and covert science including the CIA’s MK Ultra in order to bring about the
desired “mentally healthy” society cleansed of its connections to Christianity, faith in
truthfulness, national patriotism or family.
By 1971, the world was ripe for a big change.
The baby boomer targets of this vast social engineering experiment had been inundated by a
vast arsenal of cultural warfare on every level. While LSD was spread across campuses of
America, and assassinations of western leaders who resisted the new age of wars in
Southwest Asia became the norm, the baby boomers watched as their loved ones returned
from Vietnam in body bags. “Not trusting anyone over 30” became the new wisdom as love of
country was suffocated under the unnatural spread of Anglo-American imperialism abroad
and COINTEL PRO-style operations at home.
9
10. UNESCO - WHO - WFMH
THE BI-POLAR COLD WAR AND A NEW GLOBAL
PARADIGM - Cont:
By 1971, the world was ripe for a big change.
The baby boomer targets of this vast social engineering experiment had been inundated by a
vast arsenal of cultural warfare on every level. While LSD was spread across campuses of
America, and assassinations of western leaders who resisted the new age of wars in
Southwest Asia became the norm, the baby boomers watched as their loved ones returned
from Vietnam in body bags. “Not trusting anyone over 30” became the new wisdom as love of
country was suffocated under the unnatural spread of Anglo-American imperialism abroad
and COINTEL PRO-style operations at home.
When the CFR and T
rilateral Commission unpegged the US dollar from the gold reserve, a new
age of deregulation, consumerism and radical materialism was ushered in causing the baby
boomer generation to quickly transmogrify into the 1980s hyper-materialist “me” generation.
On an ecological level, a new ethic of “conservationism” had begun to move from the fringes
into the mainstream replacing the former pro-industrial ethic of the producer-creator society
that had historically governed the best of western civilization.
10
11. UNESCO - WHO - WFMH
BI-POLAR COLD WAR AND NEW GLOBAL
PARADIGM - 1971, the world was ripe for big change.
The new / old Conservation Ethic
Chief among the creators of this new conservation ethic which replaced the idea of
“protecting humanity from empire” with “protecting nature from mankind”, was none other
than Julian Huxley himself. During the same year that he co-founded the World Wildlife
Foundation, Huxley drafted the Morges Manifesto (1961) as the organizing manifesto for the
modern ecology movement pitting human civilization in stark contrast to the supposedly
closed, mathematical equilibrium of nature.
Huxley co-founded the WWF with arch Malthusians Prince Philip “I want to be reincarnated
as a deadly virus” Mountbatten and Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands.
Prince Philip- one of the promoters of De-population
11
12. UNESCO - WHO - WFMH
The material in this powerpoint came in the vast majority from: RightsFreedoms.Wordpress.Com
Article Title: “How the Unthinkable Became Thinkable”
Eric Lander, Julian Huxley and the Awakening of Sleeping Monsters
by
Esteemed Author: Matthew Ehret
Note from Graphic artist: The article- “How the Unthinkable became Thinkable” begins prior, and continues past the point I
began and concluded this powerpoint. There are three parts to this subject. Note: This is part 1 of a 3 part series on the
modern history of eugenics which originally appeared on Strategic Culture. Parts 2 and 3 will be published on OffG in the near
future, and are already available on - RightsFreedoms.Wordpress.Com - https://off-guardian.org/2021/06/12/how-the-
unthinkable-became-thinkable/ One should avail themselves the articles, at the above site. My intent was and is, to expose
the people, malignant Ideologies, and perhaps more accurately their devotion to more manipulative controls of humanity in
the now dystopian continuance of this horror of depopulation, Green absolutism, and mental “mass” psychopolitical
education. Since UNESCO, was instituted in American Schools in 1946, the three legs of the milking stool, Eugenics, Mental
Health Manipulation, with the“political concept” of Environmentalism have been inculcated, and taught as virtual truth. As to
why I stopped? As an old analyst, the genesis of an issue, must be found, hidden among the debris of the “Buffalo Pit”, for
the young to gain objective understanding.
For “History is in fact the Engine of our future”. Since that is the known, reading of the rest of the article and parts 2 & 3 are
paramount to look out the upside down window of our today, with the incentive to have a humanist tomorrow. My work is
simply meant to be a warning to the young, those who use the visual arena. L
T Robert K. Powell Jr. GDO ( Ret )
PS: Any errors are mine, and I humbly apologize for them.
12