this research paper focuses on bounce back nature of human being and hope in the time of crisis. as in the past few years the world faceses huge crisis inthe time of pandemic, how we can balance ourselves in this type of situations.

1. E-CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE
AND SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS
PRACTICES IN PREVALLING COVID
ERA
AT
STEP-HBTI
KANPUR
11TH NOVEMBER’2021

2. Investigate the association
between perceived resilience,
hope and subjective well being
among adults during pandemic
covid-19
PRESENTED BY
APARNA SINHA
RESEARCH SCHOLAR
AMITY BUSINESS SCHOOL
LUCKNOW, UTTAR PRADESH

3. INTRODUCTION TO VARIABLES
VAIRABLES NATURE
PERCEIVED RESILIENCE INDEPENDENT VARIABLE
HOPE INDEPENDENT VAIRABLE
SUBJECTIVE WELLBEING DEPENDENT VARIABLE

4. Objectives of the Study
• Main objective
• To investigate the association between resilience, hope and
subjective wellbeing during pandemic.
• Other Objectives
• To find-out the association between resilience and hope.
• To find-out the association between resilience and
subjective-wellbeing during pandemic
• To find-out the association between hope and subjective-
wellbeing during pandemic.

5. HYPOTHESIS
• H01: there is no cause and effect relationship
between perceived resilience and subjective
wellbeing.
• H02: there is no cause and effect relationship
between hope and subjective wellbeing.
• H03: there is no dependence of perceived
resilience and hope on subjective wellbeing.

6. Research Methodology
• The Study- Causal
• Sampling Design
• Population- Adults in India.
• Sampling Element - Individual adult was used as the
sampling elements of the study.
• Sampling Techniques - Non-probability purposive sampling
technique was used.
• Sample size- 170 individuals

7. • Tools for Data Collection
• The Nicholson McBride Resilience Questionnaire (NMRQ).
• ADULT HOPE SCALE (AHS)-Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M.,
Sigmon, S. T., et al.(1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-
differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 570-585.
• The Flourishing Scale is a brief 8-item summary measure of the respondent's self-perceived
success in important areas such as relationships, self-esteem, purpose, and optimism. The scale
provides a single psychological well-being score. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi,
D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2009). New measures of well-being: Flourishing and positive and
negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 39, 247-266.
• Tools Used for Data Analysis
• Reliability test was applied for checking the reliability of the Questionnaire. Cronbach’s reliability
test was used to compute reliability coefficient to check whether data inputs measure the variable
they are supposed to measure and the measures are stable when used for repeat measurement.
• Regression linear test was applied to find out relationship between independent variable
(Subjective-wellbeing) and dependent variables (Resilience and Hope).

8. Result and Discussion

9. Reliability
variable Cronbach’s alpha value
RESILIENCE 0.640
HOPE 0.469
SUBJECTIVE-WELLBEING 0.60

10. Regression analysis
Correlations
ttlsubwelbign ttlhope ttlresili
Pearson Correlation ttlsubwelbign 1.000 .468 .518
ttlhope .468 1.000 .442
ttlresili .518 .442 1.000
Sig. (1-tailed) ttlsubwelbign . .000 .000
ttlhope .000 . .000
ttlresili .000 .000 .
N ttlsubwelbign 167 167 167
ttlhope 167 167 167
ttlresili 167 167 167
Model Summaryb
Model
R R Square
Adjusted R
Square
Std. Error
of the
Estimate
Change Statistics
Durbin-
Watson
R Square
Change F Change df1 df2
Sig. F
Change
dimension0 1 .582a .339 .331 2.59068 .339 42.102 2 164 .000 2.123
a. Predictors: (Constant), ttlresili, ttlhope
b. Dependent Variable: ttlsubwelbign
ANOVAb
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 565.148 2 282.574 42.102 .000a
Residual 1100.708 164 6.712
Total 1665.856 166
a. Predictors: (Constant), ttlresili, ttlhope
b. Dependent Variable: ttlsubwelbign

13. Suggestions
• The study can also be performed on other
situation also not only in pandemic.
• The sample size can be increased to ensure the
generalization
• Similar kind of study can also be done in different
region, as well as comparative study can be done
between various states.
• As subjective wellbeing contains many factors so
we can perform this study by taking any other
parameters too.

14. Sample References
• [1] Devika Duggal,1 Amanda Sacks-Zimmerman,1 and Taylor Liberta (2016),” The Impact of Hope
and Resilience on Multiple Factors in Neurosurgical Patients”, Published online 2016 Oct
26. doi: 10.7759/cureus.849
• [2] The protective effects of resilience and hope on quality of life of the families coping with the
criminal traumatisation of one of its members. Wu HC. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20:1906–1915
• [3] Seydi Ahmet Satici 1 & Ahmet Rifat Kayis2 & Begum Satici1 & Mark D. Griffiths3 & Gurhan Can
(2020), “Resilience, Hope, and Subjective Happiness Among the Turkish Population: Fear of COVID-
19 as a Mediator”, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00443-5
• [4] Manuel Rivera, Valeriya Shapoval and Marcos Medeiros(2021),”The relationship between career
adaptability, hope, resilience, and life satisfaction for hospitality students in times of Covid-19”.
• [5] Emma Pleeging1 & Martijn Burger2 & Job van Exel3(2019), “The Relations between Hope and
Subjective Well-Being: a Literature Overview and Empirical Analysis”, Applied Research in Quality of
Life https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-019-09802-4
• [6] jolize joubert and tharina guse; june (2021),” A Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT)
Intervention Model to Facilitate Hope and Subjective Well-being Among Trauma Survivors”, Journal
of Contemporary Psychotherapy. doi:10.1007/s10879-021-09511-w
(More references can be studied from the paper)

15. THANK YOU FOR LISTENING