Hrm595Proposal Plan, Part Iv

Hrm595Proposal Plan, Part Iv
Proposal Plan Part III
HRM 595
2013
Proposal Plan Part III The purpose for the organization Walgreens is to stay put in a dynamic, self–
motivated and energetic business environment. Walgreens is a successful business looking to
progress overall presentation and place the company for potential expansion. In order for this to
follow through, a total rewards program needs to be created. The incentives and compensation plan
must connect with the goals of the organization. A solid rewards program will build motivation in
the work place. As the text states, "The notions that rewards are means to motivate employees
assuming that the rewards are distributed fairly. Rewards seem to be part of many different
perspectives in motivation ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Walgreens has the chance to brace the culture and form a complete employee development system
that supports the enterprises vision and goals for the future. To add to this the business has the
ability to explore other areas aside from the financial compensation to augment employee
motivation and job satisfaction. Executing a career development system will not be enough for
long–term enhancements. Management at Walgreens will need to center on building situations that
practice career development (Walgreens Co., 2013). Employees at Walgreens have different
interests. These interests can include financial compensation, career enhancement or development,
strong and effective communication and of course support from the management team. Employees
have the right to be rewarded fairly and be acknowledged for their efforts and hard work to the
organization. To add to this, employees have the right to be included in the organizations culture
instead of being part of teams that are divided up. This usually leads to a lack of direction.
Employees crave cooperation, a challenging working environment and dedication. That 's why
effective end state goals would be to make certain that employee motivation is being measured
effectively. Also, form career development plans and spot out important achievements within the
business. Not only employee motivation should be worked on, but also set up a comprehensive
rewards system. The
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Shakespeare
SHAKESPEARE: Shakespeare successfully establishes the nature of honour in his historical living
production Henry IV Part 1. The play embarks around the subject of honorable rebellion, primarily
through the duality of the two characters of Prince Harry (Hal) and King Henry IV as well as
Hotspur and Falstaff. Through different concepts of the major universal theme of honour displayed
by various protagonists, the interrelated ideas of power and responsibility are also made evident. As
this play unfolds, the importance of the soliloquy's, issues and conflicts are highlighted. Honour is
encapsulated from success on the battlefield to dealing with noble and respectable behaviour.
Shakespeare captures the essence of a historical tragedy and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He recognises the responsibility of his birth and reveals his true "beauty" by "breaking through the
foul and ugly mists," the kingdom will be positively stunned by his seeming transformation. The
idea is that his future subjects will be amazed, awestruck and, therefore, more loyal and obedient
when Hal is king. This strategy reveals Hal to be a rather insightful and clever politician. "My
reformation, glitt'ring o'er my fault... and attract more eyes". Hal is hiding himself underground for
now, but through his speech the audience knows that he will soon assume his rightful position as
heir to the throne. During the course of the play, Prince Harry reforms his behaviour and shows
himself to be a worthy Prince of Wales and successor to the throne. By the play's end, Hal redeems
himself on the battlefield by saving his father from Douglas. As a war hero, Hal shrugs off his
corrupt reputation, in a way gains Hotspur's honour from killing him and demonstrates his ability to
govern. In conclusion, Shakespeare clearly identifies the nature of honour through physical and
abstract concepts throughout King Henry IV Part 1. A clear glance into Honour, power and
responsibility is evidential through the protagonists, Prince Harry, King Henry, Falstaff and Hotspur.
By the end of the play, reformation and change is seen as a constructive concept which embodies a
large role in Henry IV Part

Henry Iv Part 1 Character Analysis
A leader tends to be a person you look up to, a person that you can trust and follow. In the play
Henry IV Part One by William Shakespeare there are many different types of leaders. Each one is
different because of the many different leadership qualities they possess. The story is about Prince
Hal the son of King Henry IV and the battle for the throne. Prince Hal was not well liked by his
father because he hung around in taverns all day with "drunks" instead of learning the ways of
becoming a king. Hotspur, the most well known warrior gets his family, the Percy's to challenge the
king into battle for the throne and for all of the pain the king causes their family. Hal tries to prove
to his father that he is fit to rule the kingdom one day. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During Shakespeare's time a book called The Prince was written by Niccolo Machiavelli. It was a
guide for princes on how to use power while leading. Most of Shakespeare's characters are based on
the Machiveal. In the Machiavel article it says, "The essential quality of a ruler was the effective use
of power to guarantee his own survival." Even though it sounds pretty cynical the play shows that it
is an important factor of leadership for Hal. In Shakespeare's mind, "A successful leader must have
some basic skills of the Machiavel." Some qualities of a Machiavel are being manipulative,
inventive, charismatic, and willingful. Shakespeare incorporated all of these characteristics into
Prince Hal to make him a great leader. In the article it also talks about how there is one particular
important quality to watch for. This is the Machiavelli's use of language. They use their words for
purposes of their own instead of being meaningful and honest while talking to someone. This tactic
is used by Prince Hal. While he talks with the commoners he makes them believe that he is there
friend and that he speaks the same language as them. He talks poorly about them behind their backs
but is able to gain their trust which is a good thing to have when he is running the kingdom.
Shakespeare incorporated a lot of the Machiavel figure into Prince Hal because that is what he
thinks makes an effective modern

The Role Of Self-Interest In Shakespeare's Henry IV Part One
Shakespeare's Henry IV Part One presents a world of social and political change and bloody civil
war where in the struggle for power and ascendency many individuals are motivated by self–
aggrandisement, seeking to better themselves and their reputations at the expense of others. Both the
King and his son Hal are opportunistic and self–interested, employing self–promotion and
expediency. Moreover, the desire for personal gain and power at others' cost permeates all echelons
of society, fuelling the actions of both the nobility and those from the inns and taverns. Self–interest
motivates nearly all, including those perceived as honourable and those who are known as
disreputable. However, whilst self–interest and expediency are foregrounded in ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
A pivotal individual in the world of the nobility, Worcester informs Hotspur of Henry's wrongful
acquisition of the throne, also admitting how the Percy family's "own hands have helped to make
[Henry] so portly", when it suits his purposes. With Henry no longer favouring the Percy family,
Worcester is again willing to turn on his king, highlighting his fickle nature and willingness to
support those he believes will provide power and favours, denouncing those who do not. Further,
Worcester carefully manipulates his impulsive and imprudent nephew Hotspur, only revealing that
King Henry is an imposter to the throne once Hotspur is furious with Henry –he calls him "ingrate
and cankered Bullingbrook" – and thus using Hotspur's anger to his own advantage against Henry.
On the eve of the Battle of Shrewsbury, Worcester's actions again reveal complete self–interest,
convincing Vernon that Hotspur "must not know" of Bullingbrook's offers of peace or single handed
combat between Hal and Hotspur, as he believes he will be "undone" if Hotspur accepts the king's
offers of peace. Worcester's lies to Hotspur cause the sacrifice of numerous men in battle including
the valiant Hotspur. Worcester himself understands his own self–serving intentions, admitting before
execution that "what I have done my safety urged me to". Self– interest also pervades the lower
echelons of society, which are filled with thieves such as Poins. Caring only about his own financial
benefit, Poins presents Falstaff and Hal with a plan to rob pious individuals, emphasising that the
"pilgrims going to Canterbury" have "fat purses", desiring monetary gain at the detriment of honest
people. Such self–interested behaviour is rife in the seemingly lawless world of the taverns,
powerfully seen in the two carriers at the Rochester Inn who are evasive, refusing to lend

The Role Of Context In King Henry Iv Part 1
Essay Format (Not Speech Yet) Introduction (100) Respective to the context, Shakespeare has
successfully composed his play, King Henry IV Part One, and thus had the ability to manipulate his
text into representing one particular view through various representations of people and politics.
Shakespeare's play utilises the power of words as a tool for manipulating characters to direct and
influence the responders view. Dramatic and language devices utilised by Shakespeare have clearly
been portrayed to achieve his purpose and representation of contextual influences. Overall, King
Henry IV Part One espouses the alteration of historical events to dramatise political situations and
their impact on individuals and society. Context – How context can affect representation (300) The
context, whether it may be personal, social, cultural and/or historical, greatly affected the
representation of Shakespeare's King Henry ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This has been effectively represented through Hotspur, as he undertakes roles as political deceivers
to manipulate and sway events in his favour. Within the beginning act of the play, Hotspur embraces
excuses and utilises political deceptiveness to shift the blame of withholding prisoners from Henry
IV onto another party. Hotspur reinforces that the individual who are in control of the prisoners was,
"Fresh as a bridegroom ... He was perfumed like a milliner" (Act 1, Scene 3, Lines 33–35).
Shakespeare's use of similes highlight a defensive tone for Hotspur, portraying that he is easily
provoked and arrogant by his way to divert himself out of trouble by manipulating certain events.
Also, through Shakespeare utilises nominative determinism to display Henry Percy as Hotspur as
within the play, he is seen to be very 'hot–headed' and quick to jump to a response to protect

Research Study Proposal
Research Study Proposal – Part IV: Target Population Selection Rationale for identified target
population The target population refers to the group(s) that the proposed study is designed and
intended to realistically serve. The application of the guidelines is aimed at enhancing the credibility
of the program establishment, and for which effective responses are not currently provided.
Research and experience have indicated that 68% of nearly 3.8 million retail establishments in the
U.S. believe that they are overburdened without strategic process guideline (National Retail
Federation (NRF). (2016). Hence, a strategic process guideline for establishing assisted living
program will serve well the intended proprietors in this category. I aim at providing strategic
information process guidelines for establishing assisted living program, the target population
includes proprietors who desire to establish assisted living for low to high levels of care. Moderate
care level programs accepts residents who require a moderate level of care. High level of care
program accepts residents who require comprehensive support for any number of daily activities.
(State of Maryland (Comar 10.07.14.02), 2013). Moreover, those who desire to establish an assisted
living program to improve the quality of the lives of the citizens will find the strategic process
information guideline extremely helpful and reduce the level of overwhelming frustration that
accompanies lack of clearly delineated

The Concept Of War In Shakespeare's Henry IV Part 1
Shakespeare Henry IV
Tiara Stewart–Todaro
Simon Fanning
603–101–MQ gr.00062
December 8,2017
Word count: 856
Shakespeare Henry IV
In Shakespeare's novel Henry IV Part 1, the concept of war is portrayed through different
individuals. Each character perceives war differently, leading them to take independent actions. In
this era, war was not perceived as a final solution to all their problems, but as a common event
between rulers. To die for ones' country was viewed as an act of honor, although, a certain individual
disfavored this act of honor. Throughout the novel, Shakespeare's attitude reveals the unnaturalness
of civil war, but also ties relationships together.
Shakespeare portrays that the role of being a king, and obtaining power, could be played by anyone
with the right appearance and behavior. According to King Henry, Hotspur (Lord Henry Percy) is
"the theme of honor's tongue," (1.1.80) implying that he is the ideal example of being an honorable
king, unlike his son, Prince Hal, who spends majority of his time at the tavern. King Henry and Sir
Walter Blunt agree that Hotspur would be the appropriate king of France because of his bravery,
successfulness in battles and his time spent with royalty. Although, Hotspur and his father, Earl of
Northumberland, and his uncle, Earl of Worcester, plan to overthrow the king by defeating his army
on the battlefield. Hotspur explains to his army how the king rejected and shamed his family.

Honor in Henry IV, Part One Essay
Honor in Henry IV, Part One
In Henry IV, Part One Shakespeare revels in the opportunity to suggest the idiosyncracy of character
through his command of a wide range of both verse and prose. As a result the play is full of rich and
different character parts (Wells 141). Two in particular, Falstaff and Hotspur, hold diverse beliefs
concerning the main theme of the drama, honor. In Shakespeare's time, honor was defined as the
special virtues which distinguish those of the nobility in the exercise of their vocation–gallantry in
combat with a worthy foe, adherence to the accepted code of arms, and individual loyalty to friends,
family, and comrades in arms (Prior 14). Throughout the play, honor plays an important role in ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The King complains that 'riot and dishonor' stain the brow of his son whereas Hotspur is the theme
of honor's tongue (Wells 141). Henry uses the successes in war of Hotspur, "Mars in swaddling
clothes," as a rod for Prince Hal's back (Wells 143), accusing his son of being unfit to inherit the
crown. To many critics, Hotspur is immensely attractive and rather comical in his impulsive
impetuosity–"he that kills some six or seven dozen Scots for breakfast, washes his hands, and says
to his wife, 'Fie upon this quiet life, I want work'" (2.5.102–6). Yet, this commitment to bright honor
is a dangerous obsession preoccupying Hotspur so much that he is blind to all else. To Hotspur the
more dangerous and perilous a situation, the more desire he has to throw himself helplessly into it.
To him there are no consequences; he sees no danger. All Hotspur can see is the possibility of
achieving great honors– "Doomsday is near, die all, die merrily" (4.1.134). Hotspur's life is no more
than a military commitment; he desires only to gain future glory, whether he wins or loses, lives or
dies.
For Hotspur, who glorifies the honor to be gained in battle against worthy foes, the more hazardous
the enterprise, the greater the chance of gaining honor (Prior 14). This concept of honor contrasts
greatly with that of Falstaff, a battered old soldier long turned against the nonsense of military glory,
who wanders about the Shrewsbury battlefield with a bottle of sack, not a sword,

An Analysis of Shakespeare's 'Henry IV Part 1'
One of the most appealing elements of Shakespeare's works is that, despite subject matter that is
hardly realistic in today's general society, the heart of each play retains much in terms of human
relationships, central conflicts, and humor. For the scholar the sheer poetry and beauty of
Shakespeare's language remain appealing. Hence, in a play like Henry IV, Part 1, the subject matter
of royalty and civil war from an interesting and dramatic backdrop to more common themes like the
conflicts between personal affection and the duties a person such as Prince Harry is expected to
fulfill. As such, Harry's person affection for Falstaff is ultimately overridden by his drive to regain
the admiration and affection of his father in the name of his concept of "honor" not only to the
palace, but also to England as a whole. As such, Harry claims that his affection for Falstaff and his
roguish world was simply appearance in order to more prominently return to the world of duty that
he knows is his right and destiny, which could, in today's terms, be viewed as ultimately
dishonorable. When the play opens, the young Prince Harry's major relationship is with the old and
fat knight, Sir Falstaff. The knight, however, is hardly representative of any type of knighthood that
might be expected from a person of the order. Instead, he is representative of the world of the tavern,
where thieves and generally lower–class members of society gather and pass the time either with
idle chatter or

Shakespeare Henry Iv Part 1
Throughout Shakespeare's plays Henry IV part 1, Henry IV part 2, and Henry V, Shakespeare
portrays the fictional character Hal as a loose, dangerous youth and a cold, calculating adult.
However in comparison to Hal's real–life historical counterpart King Henry V, Shakespeare
describes Hal in a harsher manner. Is it possible that Shakespeare is attempting to divulge an opinion
that he has about King Henry V's kinghood through details and characteristics he shares about his
fictional character Hal in his plays? Based on several of Shakespeare's plays, namely those that
include Hal as a character, it is clear that Shakespeare believes in the divine right to rule and is likely
injecting his view into the plots and characters of his plays. It appears

Essay on Falstaff in Henry IV Part I
The Character of Falstaff in Henry IV Part I
In Henry IV Part I, Shakespeare presents a collection of traditional heroes. Hotspur's laudable valor,
King Henry's militaristic reign, and Hal's princely transformation echo the socially extolled values
of the Elizabethean male. Molding themselves after societal standards, these flat characters contrast
Sir John Falstaff's round, spirited personality. Through Falstaff's unorthodox behavior and flagrant
disregard for cultural traditions, Shakespeare advocates one's personal values above society's.
Extolled as the "essence of Shakespeare's dramatic art" (Bloom 299) and ridiculed as the symbol of
self–indulgence and vice, the character of Sir John Falstaff, a loquacious knight, ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
But Falstaff's "heavily charged.. magnetism..and wit" (Stoll 485), surpasses the unpropitious symbol
Wilson and Stoll translate him to be. Whereas Wilson contends that critics who laud Falstaff as one
of "the most fascinating characters in literature" (Wilson 11) have been "bewitched by the old rascal
[Falstaff]...and have contracted the disease of not listening to the play" (Wilson 11), other
commentators such as Rupin W. Desai, William Hazlitt, and Harold Bloom believe Falstaff typifies
all that "we long to be and are not: free" (Goddart 75). Falstaff's jocular nature and piercing insults
disguised as humor symbolize "the supremacy of imagination over fact" (Goddard 75). Falstaff's
essence invigorate the unfettered spirit of man that resents tyrannical oppression of the mundane and
preordained expectations of society.
Of all the characters in Part I of Henry IV, "Falstaff alone changes and develops" (Desai 15).
Whereas King Henry IV remains guilt–ridden, Hotspur's "passion for honour, reputation, and
chivalry blinds him to every other consideraion" (Desai 15). Likewise, Hal, ostensibly transformed
from rebellious youth to valiant hero, acknowledges his consistent "princely nature" is veiled by
"foul and ugly mists of vapor that...strangle him" (Act I Scene III). Falstaff, alone, adeptly weaves
among his static contemporaries. This eccentric behavior and refusal to comply with society's
prevailing practices provides him with mobility often

Examples Of Diction In King Henry Iv Part 2
The poetic devices in Shakespeare's soliloquy "King Henry IV, part II" illustrates the King's resent
while having difficulties sleeping. When the man that could afford anything under the sun
encounters a circumstance his status had no control of, he proceeded to must and bargained to the
personification of sleep. Without immediate results, King Henry surrenders his pleading and lies
with demise. To portray this, Shakespeare utilizes diction, imagery, and syntax. By stating,"How
many thousands of my poorest subjects Are at this hour asleep! O sleep, O gentle sleep,Nature's soft
nurse, how have I frighted thee, That thou no more wilt weigh my eyelids down", the king "speaks"
to sleep, while expressing his thoughts through juxtaposition and diction.

"Honor" in Henry Iv, Part I – Falstaff vs. Hotspur
"Honor" In Henry IV, Part I – Falstaff vs. Hotspur
According to F. Scott Fitzgerald, "The test of a first–rate intelligence is the ability to hold two
opposing ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function." Indeed, very few
people have this quality, the playwright William Shakespeare being one of them. In many of his
plays, "Henry IV, Part One" among them, Shakespeare juxtaposes different worldviews, ideologies,
and even environments. His characters usually provide a clear example of a split among them in one
of many perspectives. One of his characters in "Henry IV"—Falstaff—is first seen as an endearing,
uproariously funny scoundrel and later reveals himself more of a lowlife with his view of honor—he
seems ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He says "I like not such grinning honor as Sir Walter hath: give me life, which if I can save, so; if
not, honor comes unlocked for, and there's an end." (V, iii) Thus, honor is, as Falstaff says, nothing
more than a word, for it expresses a concept, which can be conveniently twisted to support whatever
side of any battle that one is on.
Hotspur, on the other hand, is always seen as "honorable" even though he has caused this whole
war; there is no way, therefore, for anyone to correctly say what brings honor and what dishonors.
The second time the word "honor" appears in the play, it is on the lips of Hotspur, who is damning
the King and urging his father and Worcester to "redeem / [their] banish'd honors and [to] restore
[them]selves..." (I, iii). The reader can easily see Shakespeare's notion that the concept of honor and
its embodiment seldom come together in the reality of a single person—certainly the way that
Hotspur wants his father and uncle to redeem themselves (by dethroning the king) is not very
honorable, yet his honor is from battles won in the king's name. So despite his treasonous thoughts,
his honor from battle remains with him for the rest of his life, as even the prince calls him "valiant."
(V, i) Both Hotspur and the King believed in the undegenerate chivalric conception of honor, which
was a lofty one. Under it, trial by battle, and war, became religious affairs. Hotspur also talks of
"honor" as a symbol for a trophy of victory: he

Text Response: King Henry IV Part I
Year 12 English
Text Response – King Henry IV Part I
Prompt: Falstaff's antics can be seen as humorous, but his significance extends beyond comic relief.
Just as the Greeks incarnated in their god Dionysus with the paradox of wine; its combined power to
inspire and degrade, William Shakespeare has laced Falstaff with this same innate ability as the very
incarnation of charm and a liberator of the human spirit in his play King Henry IV Part I. Loosely
based upon the knight John Oldcastle, Falstaff's significance extends far beyond comic relief, as he
becomes the primary vessel through which Shakespeare subtly despatches his erudite commentaries
on politics upon his audience. Falstaff is both immortal and immoral, and as a self–interested
nominalist ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To those who have not dug deeper, and only choose to perceive Shakespeare's works for what they
are on the surface, rather than embracing the layers of subtleties such a text provides, they will only
ever see Falstaff's animality, and so the "vulgar Falstaff" will forever be just be vulgar. To the
enlightened, he is the embodiment of the human condition, both moral and immoral. He is what we
all long to be and are not: free. And hence he resonates strongly with our longing for emancipation,
allowing us to go on vicarious sprees in the presence of one who frequently commits all of the sins
that we do not dare to. His "immense" size is used by Shakespeare to exemplify the prospects of
living life fully as does his "love of sack" a drink humanity has often associated with longevity.
Though the ultimate reason that Falstaff has become such an icon over the centuries is because he is
the supremacy of imagination over fact. He forecasts man's final victory over fate itself. Facts stand
in our way and yet facts melt before Falstaff as they dissolve in the aqua regia of his resourcefulness
and wit. After the Gadshill Robbery, he describes how he fought off "two rogues in buckram suits"
one moment, then "eleven in buckram" the next, claiming he "'scaped by miracle" and yet when his
"gross"

Analysis Of Henry Iv Part 1
All of Shakespeare's considerable effort in the association of Henry with feminine aspects
eventually leads back to Elizabeth. During the time period Henry IV Part 1 was written during,
Elizabeth's legitimacy and authority was once again challenged. She was old and given to
confrontations with her advisors, and her line of succession was still in question as she had not yet
declared an heir. She experienced an attempted coup by the Earl of Essex and many waited for her
death and the restoration of a proper king to the throne (Smith 207–211). In writing Henry IV Part 1,
Shakespeare worked through not only the past anxieties of Elizabeth's reign, but also the current
ones. As Andrews puts it, "[i]ts depiction of an aging, infirm monarch, who worries a incessantly
over the succession and who is pressured by a young and hot–tempered but popular and militaristic
noble, provides an inescapable parallel to Elizabeth's situation at the close of the century" (381).

Turmoil In Shakespeare's Henry IV Part One
In Henry IV Part One by Shakespeare, the loathed king of England faces turmoil as his throne is
threatened. While rebel forces begin to revolt against the deteriorating king, the King's son, Prince
Hal, regularly frequents the Boar's Head Tavern where he lounges around aimlessly. Despite the
growing tensions between the court and the rebels, Hal remains loyal to his low–class friends while
disparaging the King and his authority. The strained relations between the father and son create two
vastly contrasting scenes which are presented interchangeably to demonstrate the stark difference
between the Court and the Tavern. The most notable difference, though, is the battlefield where the
King and his son experiences a sudden change in their dynamic ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The tavern is a place where laughter, alcoholic beverages, and impersonations are customary to
escape the failing leadership of the king. Although Hal is wealthy and noble, he joins the lively low–
class citizens of Eastcheap, London, where he completely disregards his obligations as a prince.
From spending too much time with his uneducated friends, Hal claims, "I can drink with any tinker
in his own language" (19.2.4). His "loose behavior" (1.2.215) is also clearly shown when he uses his
title to fool Francis, one of the waiters, by calling on him numerous times to ridicule his lower
intellect. When Falstaff, Hal's low life companion, simply asks Hal for the time, he boldly states,
"Unless hours were cups of sack, and minutes capons, and clocks the tongues of bawds, and dials
the signs of leaping–houses, and the blessed sun himself a fair hot wench in flame–colored taffeta, I
see no reason why thou shouldst be so superfluous to demand the time of the day" (3–130–30201–
9). Although this snarky comment is directed at Falstaff, it represents the laziness and inefficiency
that plagues the commoners of the Tavern as time and responsibilities are easily forgotten. After Sir
John Bracey appears at the Tavern to inform Hal of the imminent battle against the rebels, he mocks
his father, along with Falstaff, by enacting a play which illustrates the general discontent toward the
ruler. Instead of facing Henry's predicament, Hal yet again decides to escape the unattractive reality
which threatens his heir to the throne. While acting as the King, Hal insults Falstaff by claiming,
"Thou art violently carried away from grace. There is a devil haunts thee in the likeness of an old fat
man. A tune of man is thy companion. Why dost thou converse with that trunk of humors, that
bolting–hutch of beastliness?" (465–467.2.4).

Honor In Shakespeare's Henry IV, Part One
In Shakespeare's play Henry IV, Part One the theme of honour is strongly present in Falstaff's
speech, which takes place just before the battle of Shrewsbury. Although Falstaff holds a strong
opinion on the subject of honour his character's opinion is not the only one that is voiced throughout
the play. Honour frequently comes up amongst the characters of King Henry IV: Prince Henry (also
referred to as Hal), and Hotspur most prominently. It is Hotspur who embodies the purest form of
honour and thinks it is "an easy leap,/ to pluck bright honour from the pale–faced moon" (1.3.201–
202). This juxtaposes most strongly with Falstaff's view of honour which is to question "What is
honour? A word... Honour is a mere scutcheon" (5.1.133–139). Alongside ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This is not to say that Falstaff behaves honourably, but that he would rather achieve honour, and
everything that comes along with it, through deceit. Perhaps the most prominent example of
Falstaff's dishonourable actions is his willingness and quickness at which he jumps at the
opportunity to rob a group of pilgrims. At first glance this may not seem dissimilar to the royals
praising of violent acts, the difference is Falstaff's violence is a "barren pleasure" done for
"recreation's sake," as opposed to serving a greater purpose (3.2.14; 1.2.146). Falstaff also does not
have a problem lying and exaggerating the truth to make himself seem better than he actually is.
When he retells his experience of being attacked the number of robbers increases rapidly up to "A
hundred upon/ poor four of us" (2.4.155–156). The dishonourable lie contradicts the purpose it is
attempting to serve for Falstaff. It comes shortly after accusations of cowardice are thrown about
and Falstaff makes the claim that he would rather have a man "face" him (4.2.145). In order to make
himself seem braver and more honourable he tells a version of the story that will achieve this, not
realizing his audience knows the true story. At the end of the play, towards the end of the battle of
Shrewsbury, that readers see a distortion in Falstaff's actions and words. After the battle when
Falstaff sees Hotspur dead on the ground his first instinct is to assume that Hotspur, like himself, is
faking death so he stabs him in the thigh to ensure his death. This may just be another quick attempt
at gaining honour, but Falstaff may believe he is still alive. The readers know his opinion on honour
so perhaps he finds it hard to believe that anyone

Dishonor's Success In Henry IV: Part One
Falstaff's Fruits: Dishonor's Success in Henry IV: Part 1
In situations where a decision is a matter between life or death, is choosing death for honor worth
paying the price of life? In William Shakespeare's Henry IV: Part 1, the subject of honor is
repeatedly discussed throughout the development of the character of Prince Henry V, also known as
Prince Hal. Hal's father, King Henry IV, wages war on his former ally Sir Henry Percy, also known
as Hotspur, for not cooperating with his demands. Hal initially is a disappointment to the King
because instead of assisting him, Hal associates and partakes in illicit activities with thieves and
ruffians. As the play progresses, Hal promises to redeem himself in the eyes of his father by proving
himself ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
After feigning death to avoid being killed in combat, Falstaff explains that honor in death is much
worse than dishonor in life. "'Sblood, 'twas time to counterfeit... Counterfeit? I lie. I am no
counterfeit. To die is to be a counterfeit, for he is but the counterfeit of a man who hath not the life
of a man; but to counterfeit dying when a man thereby liveth is to be no counterfeit, but the true and
perfect image of life indeed" (5.4.115–122). Falstaff's remarks show that his actions, despite being
dishonorable in the eyes of others, are irrelevant to anyone but himself. Falstaff states that by
counterfeiting death, he is not a counterfeit, and this holds true as he survives because of his actions.
He does not attempt to appear honorable, because those who act honorably sacrifice the "true and
perfect image of life" in doing so. Falstaff uses his dishonor to his advantage and survive. This
allows him to find success in places where the honorable would never venture. Furthermore, upon
seeing the body of Sir Walter Blunt, Falstaff remarks upon the nature of honor in death. "Soft, who
are you? Sir Walter Blunt. There's honor for you. Here's no vanity." (5.3.34–36). Falstaff's initial
inability to identify Blunt proves that in death, honor is a title bestowed for a fruitless result. He
states that Blunt finally achieved honor in his death, and rather than be rewarded for this, he is left
lifeless, without vanity. Hal is doomed to follow the path of Blunt and other fallen nobles because
his quest for redemption through honor was never bound to yield fruitful results. Because of Hal
redeems himself, which is what he wanted in the beginning, he is compelled to continually fight on
the behalf of the King. Although this may seem like a reward for Hal's actions, this crusade is
doomed to result in his failure,

Father/Son Relationships in Shakespeare's Henry IV, Part One
Father/Son Relationships in Shakespeare's Henry IV, Part One
The relationship between a father and his son is an important theme in Shakespeare's Henry IV, Part
One, as it relates to the two main characters of the play, Prince Hal and Hotspur. These two
characters, considered as youths and future rulers to the reader, are exposed to father–figures whose
actions will influence their actions in later years. Both characters have two such father–figures;
Henry IV and Falstaff for Prince Hal, and the Earl of Northumberland and the Earl of Worcester for
Hotspur. Both father–figures for Hal and Hotspur have obvious good and bad connotations in their
influence on the character. For example, Falstaff, in his drinking and reveling, ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Falstaff is a tavern haunter, who partakes in the ìdrinking of old sackî (I.ii.4), lying, stealing, and
thinks of honor as merely ìa wordî (V.ii.74). Although Hal enjoys the company of Falstaff, it is clear
by his soliloquy in Act I, scene ii, that he intends to reform himself and act as a true prince:
ìreformation, glittering o'er my fault, Shall show more goodly and attract more eyes, Than that
which hath no foil to set it off, I'll so offend to make offence a skill, redeeming time when men least
think I will (I.ii.9).î This shift in character is exemplified in the final battle, where Hal makes the
chivalrous gesture of offering to ìTry fortune with [Hotspur] in a single fight (V.i.74).î
Hotspur on the other hand, begins the play in his father's good graces, and seems to represent the
chivalry that eludes Hal. Indeed, Hotspur, being in charge of repelling the Scots to the North, has
shown his fierceness in battle and has proven to be an accomplished military man, which are the
qualities that the King wishes Hal possessed. Hotspur, however, has a temper which worries his
father, Northumberland. In Act 1, Scene 3, he urges his son to be calmer: ìWhat, drunk with choler?
stay and pause a while (I.iii.13),î and calls his son ìa wasp–stung and impatient foolî (I.iii.16).
Northumberland is much more cautious than Hotspur, or Worcester, and

Falstaff And King Henry As Father Figures In Henry IV Part 1
In Henry IV Part 1, although Falstaff and King Henry act as father figures in Hal's life and are both
intelligent in their own right, the differences in their tone and diction showcase the major differences
in their personalities and relationship with pride. Although King Henry and Falstaff are extremely
different characters, both do act as father figures in Hal's life with Falstaff as a surrogate father and
King Henry as Hal's birth father. With King Henry, this fatherly relationship emerges as one of
blindly scolding and ordering around his son, an example being when the King criticizes Hal's
friends, "rude society" (3.2.14). The relationship with Hal and his surrogate father, Falstaff, though
is much more relaxed with Falstaff teasing Hal, by touching on Hal's slight insecurity of taking care
of his princely duties, calling Hal "true prince" (2.4.106). Although both these relationships are very
different in how relaxed they are, there is a similarity of King Henry and Falstaff acting as fatherly
figures in Hal's life. Both characters are also extremely intelligent in their own right. Falstaff often
references mythical beings and makes intelligent metaphors, one of these being when Falstaff says,
"thou knowest I am as valiant as Hercules" (2.4.106). Along with this reference to Hercules, being
very intelligent for a man as lower class as Falstaff, it also shows that Falstaff is prideful in a joking
manner. Falstaff knows that he is not as valiant as Hercules, shown in

The Hero In Shakespeare's Henry IV Part One
The Hero in Butter In Shakespeare's Henry IV Part 1, Shakespeare illustrates the future king of
England Hal's coming of age to becoming the king and Hal's journey to becoming hero that England
wants him to be. A hero is defined as a person who sees the wrong in things and denounces those
wrongs. A hero also cares for others and protects the people he or she cares for because it is what is
right. During the First Act of the play, a stout man Falstaff acts as a father figure to Hal and shows
Hal the glories and joys of life at the Tavern. Although Falstaff is a bacchanalian oaf who lives to
drink and pleasures himself with the pursuits of robbery, Hal learns a lot about the commoners and
creates connections with these people at the Taverns, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In his soliloquy on the battlefield, Falstaff questions what honor does for anyone: "Can honor / set to
a leg? No. Or an arm? No. OR take away the grief of a / wound? No" (Henry IV Part 1, 5.1.130–
132). Falstaff then concludes that "honor is a mere scutcheon" (5.1.138). Falstaff knows that Hal
like the others on the battlefield are fighting for "honor," but Falstaff sees that honor is really
nothing. His lifestyle is drink and thievery is worth more than the lives lost for the reward of that
honor. In "The Courage of Falstaff" from his an essay on the Dramatic Character of Sir John Falstaff
(1777), Shakespearean literary scholar Maurice Morgann argues that Falstaff found an issue with
honor "as well as every thing else, in ridiculous lights, and began to renounce its tyranny" (Maurice
Morgann). Morgann reveals how after finding the truth about the value of honor, Falstaff realizes the
other wrong things with what high class people valued most in their reputations: war. Falstaff saw
how death in battle was senseless and those who die trying to save honor should be pitied. This can
be seen through Falstaff's distribution of honor to Walter Blunt and others who died in the
battlefield. Also Falstaff is the hero in the bloody battlefield because he is the only character to grasp
the senselessness of war and honor. When he began to

Honor In Henry IV Part One
In Shakespeare's play, "Henry IV Part 1", the concept of honour plays a huge role in the characters.
Shakespeare's presents the concept of honour through the characters like Falstaff and Hotspur to
give readers a reflection on individual's personality and values. For Hotspur, honour feelings relate
to commitment towards his chivalric duty on the battlefield, an obsession about reputation and good
name. Whereas, Falstaff views on honour are totally opposite. Falstaff, a coward man lack the
concept of honour. For him it is a just a word that goes fades away with time and person. Falstaff
view honour dangerous to soldiers getting one nowhere and lastly, honour is just an image that he
wants to represent in the eyes of other. He is concerned ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Instead, he moves on thinking winning is an impossible victory he said, "To push against a kingdom,
with his help/ We shall o'erturn it topsy–turvy down./ Yet all goes well, yet all our joints are whole(
4.1.81–83). The absence of his father and Glendower is seen as a great chance for him to represent
himself. The things that made him seem honorable started to represent him as unfit in his position
and to lead a country, bringing him downhill. Hotspur was becoming impatient and rash. Defeating
the king army was seen as a challenge for hotspur which would make his honour more strong,
representing his reputation more strong in society and for himself. Hotspur view of honour is about
winning the battlefield by defeating king army, being in the good reputation even though King was
the main character who helped him to the throne at first place. For him, rather than being thankful
and paying off for the goodness to the king, he is going against the king by fighting his army, who
he think is effecting his honour. According to Hotspur, respect, commitment and truth is Honour.
Even though Hotspur found out that king army included forty thousand people, while his army
included less people, he was not afraid to dye as Hotspur said, " Forty let it be/ the powers of us may
serve so great a day/ Come, let us take a muster speedily/ Doomsday is

How Does Hal Change In King Henry Iv Part 1
Hal is often referred to as the "prodigal son" of Shakespeare's King Henry IV Part I. Wasteful and
lazy, Hal is seen more often drinking in a tavern or robbing others than serving as the next king of
England, though he claims that to be all an act in Act I Scene II, where he promises to redeem
himself. However, this claim seems dubious at best, Hal immediately going to then play a trick on
Falstaff and rob him. However, things seem to change in Act III Scene II. In this scene, King Henry
IV has called his son to his castle to discuss the future of England and how Hal is acting less like a
prince, and more like the wretched King Richard II, who Henry IV disposed to take the throne. Hal
replies to his father, promising that he will redeem himself in his father's eyes and in the eyes of the
English noblemen by killing Hotspur, one of the leaders of the rebellion against the king. This
speech marks a major character shift in Hal and his motivations shift from drinking and lounging
about, to that of redemption and honor through battle. This character shift is seen through many
literary devices, such as the religious and familial diction, the personification of Hal's actions, and
the juxtaposition between Hotspur and Hal. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
ii. 130–31). This biblical diction continues throughout . The religious diction also plays into the idea
of father and son, with Hal and King Henry mirroring God and his Son, Jesus. Though Hal seeks to
kill Hotspur to find his honor, he seeks to gain the approval of his father, that he will be "bold to tell
you that I am your son" (III. ii. 134). However, the king is never referred to as "father" or even by
his name, rather "my majesty" (III. ii. 132, 155), showing the disconnect between father and son
through Hal's wasteful

Henry IV Part 2 Diction
In the following soliloquy from William Shakespeare's "Henry IV, Part II," King Henry laments his
inability to sleep. As the poem progresses, so does the complex syntax. Shakespeare does this to
show King Henry's progression to madness.
Shakespeare introduces the reader to King Henry's mind by juxtaposing how Henrys "poorest
subjects are at this hour asleep" while Henry remains awake. By questioning Henry's ability to
remember, the simple task of sleeping, Shakespeare calls into question his ability to have a reliable
mind. The mental stability of the king becomes questionable as he proclaims "O sleep! O gentle
sleep!" as if sleep is a person. This apostrophe conveys the sanity that King Henry should express as
a political figure. By referring ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Henry informs sleep that he has "all appliances and means," yet his money and fortune are no match
for sleep. The nobility of the king is weak as he acts like a child who complains because he does not
get what he wants. For the second to last line of the soliloquy Henry surrenders, but also scrutinizes
sleep by informing him that he should "lie down" with the low. Henry's metaphor "Then, happy low,
lie down" represents Henry's idea that sleep will be happy with the low poor people. To display his
once apparent authority Henry commands the ever–shifting role of sleep to lie down. This remark
shows how Shakespeare views Henry's mind. At first, he believed it to be a person with a drop of
insanity, just as Henry viewed sleep in the first stanza. Then Henry was a ruthless god who
attempted to create order, but there were powerful forces, sleep, which had control over him. Finally,
Henry commands sleep to lie down like a dog who lies with fleas. Henry views himself as superior,
but Shakespeare views Henry as the uneasy "head that wears a crown." Although sleep had not taken
Henry's crown, it stole something much more important, Henry's

Relationships In Shakespeare'sTitus Andronicus And Henry...
Shakespeare lights a candle of conflict in the beginning of his plays and appeals to individual
opinions throughout his plot, only to cause the fire of confusion to engulf the reader's mind at the
end. He uses the themes of violence, bravery and lust in his plays, the Titus Andronicus and Henry
IV Part 1, to show the masculinity of the characters. Moreover, he portrays societal expectations and
the father's prejudices as the main culprits for the ill understanding between the father and the son.
How can a father's personal prejudice overpower his love for his child? Is it the father's greed for
respect and societal grandeur that causes a clash between him and his son? In Titus Andronicus and
Henry IV Part 1, Shakespeare sculpts unique and convoluted Father–Son relationships, which are a
result of the fathers' expectations and their perception of masculinity. Titus Andronicus introduces
the reader to a multifaceted relationship of a father and a son. In the very first scene of the play, just
after Titus says, "What, villain, boy / Barr'st me my way in Rome?" (1.1.295–96), he kills Mutius,
his own son. Titus is not concerned about his daughter eloping with Bassianus, rather he believes
that the ten–year long war has won him the ownership of Rome. His pride cannot let anyone, even
his son, stand between him and his prized possession. Shakespeare uses violence to depict the
masculine character of Titus. Titus' ego shines more brightly in these lines than his love for his son.

Part IV: Organizational Design
Part IV Organizational Design This section of the report covers several important topics. The first
part will cover the authority, structure and organization of the different personnel and departments
that are involved in the food survey for the hospital. The topics of how communication will be
conducted, how education of staff will be done and how annual evaluations will be handled and
external entities and their involvement will all be discussed as well.
Authority Structure Each dimension of the current personnel will have a different task and function.
The board of directors will make all major and "final" calls on things and matters of import and will
have a bit of veto power over the executive leadership. The executive leadership acts in partnership
with the board of directors with the major difference for the executives being that they explicitly
direct and guide the rest of the firm in terms of how the study is undergone and the implementation
of anything that is recommended and decided upon after the fact. The quality improvement
committee will be the primary source of review and feedback regarding the efficacy of the survey
itself and the implementation of everything done thereafter. The medical staff will serve as the front
line of the implementation of any plan and they will also be the eyes and ears of how the plan is
going including what is going right, what is going wrong and so forth. Middle management will
have the task of keeping the medical staff

The Conflicting Nature Of Power In Shakespeare's King...
When an individual is situated in a position of power, their actions are determined by their present
company. In this way, an individual may act in conflicting ways in order to please their present
audience and thus are removed from the power they are deemed to possess. The pivotal characters in
William Shakespeare 's King Henry IV Part 1 successfully portray the conflicting nature of power
throughout the play and ultimately comment on how aspects of politics are subject to the opinions of
spectators. Politics is defined as the process of making decisions applying to all members of each
group, involving a variety of groups resulting in the nature of politics changing depending on the
participants. The conflict between Prince Hal and King ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Henry laments over the fact that Hal is not the son he would have liked, religiously alluding to the
unruliness of his son that he has no control over is the punishment from God as a result of his
usurpation of the throne. This religious allusion reflecting on Henry's sins demonstrates the both the
political power the King obtains, as he deposed the previous King, but also the powerlessness he has
in correspondence to the Lord, and his own conscience. In addition, Henry use of the term "grafted"
describes Prince Hal's connection to Falstaff and the subsequent rejection of his more important
blood relations and thus his role as the heir to the English throne. It can be argued that Hal purposely
attempts to separate himself from the royal role that his father sets for him, understanding that his
father usurped the Divine Right of Kings and thus sought the company of individuals that would
successfully result in the disapproval of his father and the Royal Court. Hal finds companions in the
rouges in which inhabit the Boar 's Head Inn and Eastcheap, including the thieving surrogate father
Falstaff. However, while the two locations and companies are considered to differ starkly,
Shakespeare successfully mirrors the separate destinations in first two scenes between the Royal
Court and the "Rouge Court" found in the Boar's Head Inn. Whilst the occupants are of the Inn are
freely labelled as thieves, the occupants of the

Part Iv Issues On Chinese Language Teaching
Part IV Issues on Chinese Language Teaching
As a state school situated in a low SES area, Loganlea SHS's vocational education outperforms its
academic education. Its disadvantaged geographic location make it very hard for the school to
promote literacy and numeracy development among the majority of vocational students who are
with low level of general skills and academic aspirations and lack of motivations. It is likely that
subjects with cognitive engagement would not attract students by nature.
Loganlea SHS is my second practicum placement. In this school, my teaching subject is Mandarin
(Chinese). At Loganlea SHS, Chinese language subject is offered to students from Year 7 to Year 12.
Compared to other second languages, Chinese is very difficult for English speakers to learn, because
the language system and grammar structure are totally different from English. It is highly likely that
the level of difficulty can challenge students' confidence and capability and demotivate students
eventually. Moreover, students in low SES families and area tend to have low self–efficacy and
motivations in learning. Low expectations on education may exert negative influence on their
academic performance. In addition, relative low level of literacy and numeracy knowledge and skills
among a large number of students at Loganlea SHS may inhibit their second language acquisition
process. These factors may exert negative influence on student learning process and their behaviors
management. It

Honor In Henry IV, Part 1, And Achilles
The theme of honor can be found in many great works of literature. It is a theme that often plays
into who a character is and how they act. This is especially prevalent in the play Henry IV, Part 1 by
Shakespeare and the epic The Iliad by Homer. In these two works, there are characters who are
completely different concerning honor. The characters Falstaff, from Henry IV, Part 1, and Achilles,
from The Iliad, can be contrasted using the theme of honor. Falstaff can be contrasted with Achilles,
in relation to the theme of honor, because he is a dishonorable person. Falstaff is the most
dishonorable character in the play. He consistently does not give any thought to being honorable and
even goes so far as to say that honor is worthless. He just wants to take the easy path to having
money and being well thought of instead of working for it. So he will throw others under the bus to
either make himself look better or to make money. Falstaff makes many dishonorable decisions
during the Boars Head scene. Throughout the entirety of this scene, Falstaff lies and consistently
tries to make himself look better than what he actually is. Just before this scene Falstaff and his gang
had just robbed some merchants, which is a very ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When Hal gave Falstaff command over some soldiers, even Fallstaff himself said "I have misused
the king's press damnably," (Henry 4.2.12) when he was choosing his troops he chose "good house–
holders, yeoman's sons.../ contracted bachelors, such as had been asked / twice on the banns."
(Henry 4.2.15–17) He intentionally chose people who had money and were cowards because he
knew that they would bribe him into letting them go. Then after they had bribed him he filled the
empty spaces with people that "were never soldiers, but / discarded unjust serving–men."(Henry
4.2.28–29). He chose these people as they were all he could hire after all the able–bodied fighters
had bribed him out of their

Henry IV, Part 1, by Shakespeare Essay
In order for one to keep their political status and please their country, there are some qualities, traits
and skills required. For some, political skills may be a natural or intuitive trait. For others, it feels
uncomfortable and takes excessive effort. In either case, political skills must be practiced and honed
in order to recap its benefits. For instance, one may naturally possess skills such as listening to
others, communicating and commitment. On the other hand, one may not possess those skills and it
may require excessive effort to possess those skills. Prince Hal realizes that he must learn to possess
these characteristics if he wants to be a successful king. Henry IV, Part 1 by Shakespeare deals with
the struggle of King Henry IV ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Poins says that they will "set forth before or after them, and appoint them a place of meeting" but
they will "pleasure to fail" (1.2.144–146). Hal is able to plot a plan against anyone, whether it is
upper or lower class. He has the ability to manipulate anyone and feet no pity towards his "friend."
Secondly, Hal has different views compared to his father on governing and how to please his
country. Prince Hal is convincing his father that when it is time for him to take his responsibilities,
he will. Hal says that if he can demonstrate that he is not guilty of the false charges then King Henry
will forgive him when he does confess of the youthful indiscretions he actually did commit. Hal
says that these charges are "nothing pleaseth but rare accidents." (1.2.178) He states that he may be
acting like hooligan now, but when he does take up his duties he will begin to act like a king. He
clarifies that when he is done behaving in a foolish way and he accepts his responsibilities, he will
seem like a far better man to the society. Hal tries to give everyone a wrong expectation because he
thinks that by transforming into a completely different person, he will be able to please his country.
Thirdly, Hal is able to convince anyone to believe his word which is an important trait. King Henry
told off Hal for his foolish behaviour and Hal was able to convince his father that he had

A Summary Of Misogyny In Henry IV Part 1
In Henry IV Part 1, Shakespeare introduces two relationships that seem to be polar opposites of each
other, the married couple, Hotspur and Lady Percy and the newly wedded couple, Mortimer and
Lady Mortimer. Even though Lady Percy and Lady Mortimer did not have key roles in the play they
were significant to the portrayal of their male counterparts and Shakespeare's portrayal of misogyny
in the late 16th century. In the Elizabethan era, women were considered second class citizens, and
weren't allowed the same rights as men, and that misogynistic behavior resulted in many unhappy
marriages. In Shakespeare's play, Mortimer and Lady Mortimer are the only characters with a happy
relationship because they don't exhibit the same sexist attitude as the other characters; while Hotspur
and Lady Percy's relationship is an example of how England's misogynistic attitude resulted in an
unhappy marriage. Lady Percy and Hotspur's marriage is an example of misogyny because, even
though Hotspur is married to Kate, he refuses to treat her as his equal and instead insults her when
she shows concern for his strange behavior. When Lady Percy questions Hotspur's behavior,
Hotspur tells her that:
But hark you, Kate, I must not have you henceforth question me whither I go, nor reason
whereabout. Whither I must, I must, and to conclude, this evening must I leave you, gentle Kate. I
know you wise, but yet no farther wise than Harry Percy's wife. Constant you are, but yet a woman;
and for secrecy no

Hal, Hotspur, and Personality in Shakespeare's 'Henry IV,...
Hal, Hotspur and Personality in Henry IV, Part 1 Introduction: William Shakespeare's Henry IV, Part
1, composed during the last years of the 16th century, is as much as character study as it is a
retelling of a moment in history. Though the play is titled for one king, it truly seems to revolve
around the actions of the titular character's successor. Indeed, Henry IV is a story of the coming–of–
age of Prince Hal and of the opposition that he must face in this evolution. This process gives
narrative velocity to what is essentially a conflagration between two personality types. In Prince
Hal, the audience is given a flawed but thoughtful individual. Equally flawed but more given over to
action than thought is his former ally and now–nemesis, Hotspur. In the latter, Shakespeare offers a
warrior and a man of action and in the former, the playwright shows a politician in his nascent
stages of development. The contrast between them will drive the play's action. Discussion: Hotspur's
is decidedly not political or diplomatic in his orientation. Quite to the contrary, he is a figure
unafraid to express anger, resentment and hostility toward the King. As he does so, he speaks with
the tongue of a warrior, impassioned by his sense of honor and resistant to any calming reason. He
speaks sarcastically and derisively with his own father for being reluctant to turn his back on Henry
IV. Particularly because the Duke of Northumberland and his son had been so critical to helping
Henry

King Henry Iv Part 1 Analysis
In the creation of a text the composer's choices relating to the ways in which they construct the text
are used to position the responder towards a desired interpretation. This is particularly evident in
texts concerning people and politics as the composers shaping of the text manipulates the responder
to favour a particular political view or person's perspective. In the play 'King Henry IV Part One'
(c.1597) writer William Shakespeare constructs the text so that the audience conforms to his idea of
the rightful ruler as influenced by his personal and historical context. Similarly, in the television
series 'The Borgias' (2011) created by Neil Jordan the text is constructed so that the audience
favours the corrupt Pope despite his flaws, which ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This conflict is the result of the opposing views of who is the best option for the next Pope and
therefore what is best for Rome. Della Rovere believes that while Borgia has "organising genius" the
church more importantly needs "honesty, propriety" and "goodness", all of which he accuses Borgia
of lacking. Both Borgia and della Rovere are corrupt, however, the audience is positioned to support
the Borgia despite his flaws. He is portrayed as the Spanish "white Moor" and the despised
underdog. However his ambition and determination fuels him to achieve his goals and the audience
is positioned to admire this. This is particularly evident in a scene in the first episode between
Borgia and della Rovere where the two were sat next to each other in a darkened hallway. Della
Rovere threatens Borgia asserting, "I shall fight you to the end and beyond if that need be, with any
means necessary." Della Rovere is characterised through the used of lighting, he is shown in
shadows and darkness. Whereas Borgia is illuminated by the opposing window when he says, "I do
tend to win whatever battles I fight" before symbolically rising above della Rovere. Through this
characterisation the audience is positioned to align with Borgia over della Rovere in this

King Henry Iv Part 1 Essay
Passage Analysis – Act 5 Scene 1, lines 115–138.
Shakespeare's 'King Henry IV Part I' centres on a core theme of the conflict between order and
disorder. Such conflict is brought to light by the use of many vehicles, including Hal's inner conflict,
the country's political and social conflict, the conflict between the court world and the tavern world,
and the conflicting moral values of characters from each of these worlds. This juxtaposition of
certain values exists on many levels, and so is both a strikingly present and an underlying theme
throughout the play. Through characterization Shakespeare explores moral conflict, and passage
three is a prime example of Falstaff's enduring moral disorder. By this stage in the play Hal has ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Falstaff's soliloquy questioning the value of honour is an ironic contrast with how Hotspur and Hal
regard honour. By now the contrast between their highly ordered morality and Falstaff's own moral
disorder is obvious. Falstaff's inclusion at this point, when Hal has left his side and moved on, is
necessary to point out the differing morality between the two, which was once so similar. Falstaff is
of paramount importance to the sub–plot dealing with Hal's decision between continuing his
carefree lifestyle or maturing into the role he is destined to play as a respected prince and later king.
This soliloquy continues the theme of another of Falstaff's in Act 4 Scene 2, in which he is equally
undisturbed by his amorality, and shows that his highest concern is for his own well being.
Falstaff begins by remarking to himself how absolutely unnecessary it would be to go to one's death
before their time. He uses the metaphor of owing money, making a comparison between paying bills
and death. It is characteristic of a member of the materialistic tavern world to draw a metaphor with
such a concrete, solid and no–nonsense thing as finance. He simply cannot understand why one
would be willing to pay such a debt before it is owed – he himself is 'loath to pay' such a thing as his
life in what he sees as a worthless and empty cause. He personifies death in his metaphors, saying he
will not surrender to 'him' until he must, and will wait until

Falstaff's Role in Henry IV, Part One Essay
Falstaff's Role in Henry IV, Part One
Henry IV, Part One, has always been one of the most popular of
Shakespeare's plays, maybe because of Falstaff. Much of the early criticism
I found concentrated on Falstaff and so will I. This may begin in the
eighteenth century with Samuel Johnson. For Johnson, the Prince is a "young
man of great abilities and violent passions," and Hotspur is a "rugged
soldier," but "Falstaff, unimitated, unimitable Falstaff, how shall I
describe thee? Thou compound of sense and vice . . . a character loaded
with faults, and with faults which produce contempt . . . a thief, a
glutton, a coward, and a boaster, always ready to cheat the weak and prey
upon the poor; to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
No one can deny that he is
in fact a glutton and a thief. A coward is debatable. I choose to think he
is. He is self centered and cares only for his own profit and enjoyment. He
will protect himself at all costs including playing " possum" if necessary
to avoid injury. When he misuses the money intended to buy troops and
weapons, he turns it into profit for himself. Once again, with no concern
for anyone else, he potentially jeopardizes the troops, the battle and the

kingdom with substandard men and materials while making money for himself.
It makes the reader question, what kind of friend is he to Hal that he
would misuse the trust that has been given him. All the easier for Hal to
ultimately recognize that this is not the kind of person or people he wants
to associate himself with, let alone approve of.
Johnson's second assumption that you can detach Falstaff's frivolity
from the real drama is in fact true, but what would you have left? A less
interesting, less amusing drama with only one main plot. Falstaff is of
paramount importance to the sub–plot dealing with Hal's decision between
continuing his carefree life style or maturing into the role he is destined
to play as a respected prince and later king. This story would be pretty
dull if Hal didn't have to choose between an entertaining life like
Falstaff's or an honorable one as a gallant warrior and respected

King Henry Iv Part II Diction
In a very haunting soliloquy from "King Henry IV part II' by William Shakespeare the reader is
enthralled with the thoughts of King Henry, who is in the despairing clutches of a very common
chronic disorder named Insomnia. Through author's use of diction and imagery, we are able, as a
reader, to fully understand his state of mind in such a sleep–deprived and frustrating situation.
Throughout the entirety of the soliloquy, the author, William Shakespeare, uses contrast as a form of
imagery. When depicting settings in which sleep arrives and settings in which it does not, the reader
can understand the king's thoughts. For example, Shakespeare describes, in lines six through eight,
"smoky cribs" or huts that are fly–filled as the places where ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The author's diction is a reliable asset to the understanding of King Henry's emotions towards
himself, who has Insomnia, and towards others who do not have such a disorder. At the beginning of
the King's soliloquy, he questions sleep in a personifying manner. "O gentle sleep! Nature's soft
nurse, how have I frightened thee," makes it clear that King Henry feels himself is to blame for his
lack of sleep and that sleep being a "Nurse" can cure him of his disorder. It also reflects his own
frustration regarding the unresponsiveness of his sleep to come and claim him. As his soliloquy
continues it becomes evident that he begins to feel indignation and a feeling of being wronged by
sleep because others find it so easy to perform such action, while he struggles and gets nowhere.
This can be backed up by the constant negative connotative words being used by the author when
speaking of others who are able to sleep. For example, in line seven the author uses the word
"uneasy" to describe the setting of a place where sleep is present for people, and in line thirteen,
Shakespeare uses the word "loathsome' as a nab at the beds that are hardly any good yet are still able
to provoke sleep. The King's desperation is also shown when the author evokes an entity with the
utmost of negative connotation and

Father And Son In Henry IV, Part 1
Fathers and sons To me the relationship of a father and son is a deep bond that two beings can have.
From a young child's point of view, his father is his main male role model. As a result, many
children when young may want to be like their fathers when they grow up. Although this may
change as children grow up and are introduced to new ideas and try to figure out who they are, this
is where the father is either understanding of his son's choices or against them. As young adults, we
don't like to be told what to do or be criticized for our choices, so if we find solace in someone else
who understands us and does not judge us, we view that person more highly almost fatherly, but
though you view that person highly you know that he cannot take the place of your blood father. In
the play Henry IV, Part 1 we are introduced to King Henry, who is Hal's father and the new monarch
of Great Britain. Henry became the new monarch by overthrowing King Richard. I can only imagine
the amount of pressure he most have trying to prove that he is a worthy king since he did not obtain
the throne through bloodline. In Act 1, scene 1, Henry is talking to Westmoreland about Prince Hal.
From the first line Henry sets this tone of disappointment when speaking of his son Hal. "Yea, there
thou mak'st me sad, and mak'st me sin. In envy that lord Northumberland should be the father to so
blessed a son." Henry is not proud to have Hal as his son. Henry is so ashamed that he begins to
praise

Summary Of Father And Son Relationships In Henry IV Part 1
While almost any man can father a child, there is so much more importance of the father figure in a
child's lifetime. Fathers that are willing to be actively involved have a great importance in their sons
lives. They are able to add to their sons knowledge of manhood. Shakespeare made that certain in
his writing "Henry IV, Part 1". This play goes into depth of father son relationships between two
characters; Hotspur and Prince Hal. These two characters both posed fathers that had the capability
of affecting their life choices and not always for the right reasons. The two men had two father
figures to look up to. Falstaff, was an old drunk who revolved his life around partying and stealing.
Henry IV believed that Prince Hal was simply sent to him as a punishment. The two together both
made Prince Hal the man he was. Hotspur had the two conniving father figures; Thomas and Henry
Percy. Their overall plan was just to make Hotspur's life and living hell. Father and son relationships
have the capability to influence one's relationships with others and the choices made in their futures
and that is exactly what these men did. Henry IV Part one tells a story about Prince Hal, a heir to the
british throne and his "evolution" from wild child to an independent leader. However, Prince Hal
stated this whole wild child movement was just for show. He believes that acting like an immature
young adult and then having a big change will make the people enjoy his as a leader even more.

A Summary of William Shakespeare's 'Henry IV' Part 1
Henry IV, Part 1 William Shakespeare is considered the most important playwright of the European
Renaissance, if not the most important of all time. Each character in his collected works is uniquely
defined and highly memorable. In Henry IV, Part I, Shakespeare writes about the struggle for the
control of England during the time of the title king. Everything is in turmoil following his ascension
to the throne and his legacy is in question because of the perceived personality of his successor to
the crown. Not only does he endeavor to maintain his control of the throne, but also vying are his
son Hal who wants to takeover after his father and the rival Hotspur who wants it for himself but
also is representative of an entire faction of people who want to rebel against Henry IV and do not
feel loyal to him. Each of these men believes himself to be rightfully entitled to become the king and
this is a major theme that play out throughout the play, namely what it means to be worthy of the
title King of England; being king is far more than a matter of luxury and power, it is a burden that
only worthy men should be allowed to undertake. For the current ruler of England, King Henry IV,
he believes himself entitled because of what he was willing to do in order to obtain the throne. The
former king, Richard II, was murdered and his chosen heir passed over by the zealous Henry. This
perception of him as a usurper of the throne spreads out to those who had once supported him.
Hotspur

Hrm595Proposal Plan, Part Iv

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jennifer Wood

More from Jennifer Wood (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Hrm595Proposal Plan, Part Iv