🫀 Listen up, ladies! It's time to take charge of your heart health! Forget what you think you know about heart disease – this ain't just a "man's problem" anymore. ♀️ In "Heart Disease in Women: 1st Edition," Dr. Nanda, Navin C. cracks the code on women's unique cardiac risks and empowers you to fight for a healthy, vibrant life.
Russian Call Girls Kota * 8250192130 Service starts from just ₹9999 ✅
Heart Disease in Women by M.D. Nanda, Navin C
1.
2. 🌟Welcome to Your Journey of Ultimate Wellness! 🌈💖
Thank you for choosing our ebook/magazine! 📘✨To enhance your health and beauty
experience, we've curated some phenomenal products that promise to elevate your
well-being. 🌺🌟
Skincare Saviors:
Hydrossential - Unique Beauty Serum: 💦One Simple Way To Maintain A Flawless
Skin. Link: https://mas.so/hydrossential
Sun-Kissed Confidence:
Totally Bangin' Tan by Turbo Babe: ☀️Go From “Pale Princess” to “Golden Goddess”
with this Anti-Aging Sunless Tanning. Link: https://mas.so/bangin
Hairraisingly Healthy:
FoliPrime - The Natural Egyptian Hair Balm: 💆♀️Supports Hair Health. Link:
https://mas.so/foliprime
Men's Wellness Wonders:
Endo Pump - Male Enhancement MONSTER: 💪U.S. Scientists Discover Secret For
Stamina & Virility At Any Age. Link: https://mas.so/endopump
African “Sex Monkeys” Unveil How To Reverse Erectile Dysfunction So You Can Have
A Rock Hard Erection Again And Last At Least 30 Minute In Bed! (Note: Due to the
potentially offensive language, I recommend considering revising this title and
description.) Link: https://mas.so/edprotocol
Conquer Health Concerns:
MenoRescue: 🧘♀️Support healthy hormone levels with MenoRescue™. Formulated
using the latest Ivy League research. Link: https://mas.so/menorescue
GlucoFence - Blood Sugar Support: 🛡️#1 Most Hated By Big Pharma , Rogue Doctor
Fixes Type 2 Diabetes. Link: https://mas.so/glucofence
Bonus Goodies:
NEW '23: Archangel Health Prayers for 400 Diseases, Weight Loss... Link:
https://mas.so/archangels
Natural Therapy With Killer VSL & Captivating Hook That Converts Like Crazy For
Both Health & PD Niches! Powerful Therapy Based On Acupuncture. New Non-
Invasive Alternative. To Electro-Acupuncture, Producing Astounding Results… Self-
Application Is Easy, Rapid Response. Link: https://mas.so/naturaltherapy
Every Morning This Ancient Amazonian “Drip Method” Is Being Used To Support
Healthy Weight Loss. Link: https://mas.so/ignite
The "Hidden Survival Muscle" In Your Body Missed By Modern Physicians That Keep
Millions Of Men And Women Defeated By Pain, Frustrated With Belly Fat, And
Struggling To Feel Energized Every Day… Link: https://mas.so/hipflexors
Meditation - "InnaPeace Meditation Program" : The InnaPeace Program for Anxiety
Sufferers, Discover why thousands are flocking to what experts are calling “the most
advanced self-development method known to human kind”. Link:
https://mas.so/innapeace
Don't miss out on these amazing products! Click the links above and start your journey
to a healthier, happier you!
Don't let shortened links with mas.so send shivers down your spine! 🥶It's just a friendly
URL shrinker, like a superhero packing superpowers into a tiny suit. 💪👀Fear not, visit
https://mas.so and see what mas.so is. ✨Then, click with confidence and discover your
favorite products! 🗺️Trust needs to be built on the first click. Thanks!💎
5. Heart Disease
in Women
Editors
Navin C Nanda MD DSc(Hon)
Distinguished Professor of Medicine and Cardiovascular Disease
Division of Cardiovascular Disease and
Director, Heart Station/Echocardiography Laboratories
University of Alabama at Birmingham and the University of
Alabama Health Services Foundation
The Kirklin Clinic, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
President, International Society of Cardiovascular Ultrasound
Nurgül Keser MD
Professor of Cardiology
Sakarya University Medical Faculty
Sakarya, Turkey
Foreword
Prof (Dr) Muzaffer Elmas
New Delhi | London | Philadelphia | Panama
The Health Sciences Publisher
7. Dedicated to
My late parents
Balwant Rai Nanda MD and Mrs Maya Vati Nanda
My wife
Kanta Nanda MD
Our children
Nitin Nanda, Anita Nanda Wasan MD and Anil Nanda MD
Their spouses Sanjeev Wasan MD and Seema Tailor Nanda, and
our grandchildren Vinay and Rajesh Wasan, and Nayna and Ria Nanda
Navin C Nanda MD DSc(Hon)
My mother and father
Zehra Keser and Mehmet Keser
who made all things possible
Nurgül Keser MD
8.
9. Contributors
Sahar S Abdelmoneim MBBCH MS MSc
Cardiovascular Ultrasound Imaging and
Hemodynamic Laboratory
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases
Assiut University
Assiut, Egypt
Kul Aggarwal MD
Professor of Clinical Medicine, University
of Missouri
Chief, Cardiology Section, Harry S
Truman Veterans Hospital
Columbia, Missouri, USA
Michelle A Albert MD MPH
Howard University College of Medicine
and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine,
Department of Medicine, Howard
University Hospital
Washington DC, USA
Ezra A Amsterdam MD
Distinguished Professor of Medicine
Department of Internal Medicine
Associate Chief (academic affairs)
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
Master Clinician Educator
University of California Davis Medical
Center
Sacramento, California, USA
Zinzi Bailey MSPH
Department of Social and Behavioral
Sciences, Harvard School of Public
Health
Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Kunal Bhagatwala MBBS
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Division of Cardiovascular Disease
Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Joseph R Biggio Jr MD
Professor
Director, Division of Maternal Fetal
Medicine
Medical Director, Obstetric Services
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Lori A Blauwet MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Peter C Block MD FACC FSCAI
Emory University Hospital
Emory University School of Medicine
Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Uğur Canpolat MD
Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Training and
Research Hospital
Cardiology Clinic
Ankara, Turkey
Sibel Catirli Enar MD
*Associate Professor of Cardiology
Turkey Hospital/Memorial Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey
Kelli Chaviano DO
Philadelphia College of Osteopathic
Medicine
Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Reema Chugh MD FACC
Cardiologist
Specialist in Adult Congenital Heart
Disease and
Heart Disease in Pregnancy
Department of Internal Medicine
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center
Panorama City, California, USA
Anne B Curtis MD FACC FHRS FACP FAHA
Charles and Mary Bauer Professor and
Chair
University at Buffalo Distinguished
Professor
Department of Medicine
University at Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, USA
Mackram F Eleid MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Interventional Cardiology Fellow
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Stephanie El-Hajj MD
Department of Internal Medicine
Louisiana State University Health
Sciences Center, Baton Rouge
Louisiana, USA
Cevdet Erdöl MD
Professor of Cardiology
Member of the Grand National Assembly
of Turkey
Ankara, Turkey
Keith C Ferdinand MD FACC FAHA
Professor of Clinical Medicine
Division of Cardiology
Tulane University School of Medicine
New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
Charu Gandotra MD
Assistant Professor
Division of Cardiology
Department of Internal Medicine
Howard University Hospital
Washington, DC, USA
Gopal Ghimire MD DM MRCP
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Division of Cardiovascular Disease
Birmingham, Alabama, USA
10. viii Heart Disease in Women
Fadi G Hage MD FASH FACC
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases
Department of Medicine
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Rachel R Huxley DPhil
School of Population Health
University of Queensland
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Aryana Jacobs BA
Howard University College of Medicine
and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
Department of Medicine, Howard
University Hospital
Washington DC, USA
Nidhi Karia MBBS
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Division of Cardiovascular Disease
Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Tugba Kemaloglu Oz MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Division of Cardiovascular Disease
Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Nese Keser MD
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Research and
Training Hospital
Department of Neurosurgery
Istanbul, Turkey
Nurgül Keser MD
Professor of Cardiology
Sakarya University Medical Faculty
Sakarya, Turkey
Anant Kharod MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Department of Internal Medicine
Birmingham, Alabama
Jennifer Kiessling MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Division of Cardiovascular Disease
Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Juliana M Kling MD MPH
Department of General Internal Medicine
Mayo Clinic
Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
Anand Kulkarni MD FACC
Robert Wood Johnson Physician
Enterprise
Somerset, New Jersey, USA
Rachana Kulkarni MD FACC
Medicor Cardiology and
Chairman of Department of Medicine
Somerset Medical Center
Somerset, New Jersey, USA
Rebecca D Levit MD
Emory University School of Medicine
Department of Medicine, Division of
Cardiology
Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Rekha Mankad MD FACC
Instructor of Medicine
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Francesca Mantovani MD
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases
Cardiovascular Ultrasound Imaging and
Hemodynamic Laboratory
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Luis D Meggo Quiroz MD
Third Post-graduate Year, Department of
Internal Medicine
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama USA
Ankit Mehra MD
Cardiovascular Fellow, University of
Missouri and Harry S Truman Veterans
Hospital, Columbia, Missouri, USA
Virginia M Miller PhD
Departments of Surgery and Physiology
and Biomedical Engineering
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Sobia Mujtaba MD
Medical Resident
Jacobi Medical Center
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Bronx, New York, USA
Sharon L Mulvagh MD FACC FAHA FASE
FRCP(C)
Professor of Medicine
Director Women’s Heart Clinic
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Deepika Narasimha MD
PGY-3, Internal Medicine
Department of Medicine
University at Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, USA
Chitra Narasimhan MD FICPC
Assistant Professor of Clinical Pediatric
Cardiology
Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular
Sciences and Research
Bengaluru, India
Samar A Nasser PhD MPH PA-C
Director of Research Partnership
UM-Dearborn/Oakwood Healthcare
Research Partnership
The University of Michigan-Dearborn
School of Education
Dearborn, Michigan, USA
Navin C Nanda MD DSc(Hon)
Distinguished Professor of Medicine and
Cardiovascular Disease
Division of Cardiovascular Disease and
Director, Heart Station/Echocardiography
Laboratories
University of Alabama at Birmingham
and the University of Alabama Health
Services Foundation, The Kirklin Clinic
Birmingham, Alabama, USA
President, International Society of
Cardiovascular Ultrasound
Sanne AE Peters PhD
Julius Center for Health Sciences and
Primary Care
University Medical Center Utrecht,
Utrecht, The Netherlands
The George Institute for Global Health
University of Sydney
Sydney, Australia
Ileana L Piña MD MPH
Associate Chief of Academic Affairs
Division of Cardiology
Montefiore Medical Center
Professor of Medicine
Professor of Epidemiology and
Population Health
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Bronx, New York, USA
11. ix
Contributors
Amy West Pollak MD MS
Department of Internal Medicine
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases
Women’s Heart Clinic
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Julie J Ramos MD
Attending Cardiologist
Montefiore Medical Center
Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Bronx, New York, USA
Mary L Rosser MD PhD
Assistant Professor and
Attending Physician
Department of Obstetrics and
Gynecology and Women’s Health
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Montefiore Medical Center
Bronx, New York, USA
Kumar Sanam MD
Division of Cardiovascular Disease
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Anita Saxena MD DM FACC FAMS
Department of Cardiology
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
New Delhi, India
Anurag Singh MD
Fellow, Electrophysiology
Department of Cardiology
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, USA
Necati Sirmaci MD
Professor of Cardiology
Turkish Heart and Research Foundation
Istanbul, Turkey
Akila Subramaniam MD MPH
Maternal-Fetal Medicine/ Medical
Genetics Fellow
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Aylin Sungur MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Division of Cardiovascular Disease
Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Manish Tandon MD
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, USA
Suman Tandon MD
Yale University School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, USA
Cynthia C Taub MD
Director, Non-Invasive Cardiology
Einstein Division
Montefiore Medical Center
Associate Professor of Clinical Medicine
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Bronx, New York, USA
Jane S Titterington MD PhD
Emory University School of Medicine
Department of Medicine, Division of
Cardiology
Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Lale Tokgozoglu MD FACC FESC
Professor
Department of Cardiology
Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine
Ankara, Turkey
Yvonne T van der Schouw PhD
Julius Center for Health Sciences and
Primary Care
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, The Netherlands
IB Vijayalakshmi MD DM FICC FIAMS
FIAE FICP FCSI FAMS DSc
Professor of Pediatric Cardiology
Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular
Sciences and Research
Bengaluru, India
Nanette K Wenger MD
Emory University School of Medicine
Department of Medicine, Division of
Cardiology
Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Mark Woodward PhD
The George Institute for Global Health
University of Sydney
Sydney, Australia
Department of Epidemiology
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Victoria Zysek DO MBA
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases
Women’s Heart Clinic
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, USA
12.
13. Foreword
The Sakarya University, founded in 1970, has become a world class institution with several schools, institutes and as
many as 14 centers performing research in various scientific fields. During the past few years, it has been recognized for
"excellence" and has won several awards including the European Commission and National Quality Awards. Last year, it
received the "sustainability in excellence" award as well as an award for innovations and supporting innovative studies.
The University is also sensitive to national and international problems and issues and one of its missions is to collaborate
actively with other international organizations towards solving them on a global scale.
During the International Congress on Women and Health organized by the Sakarya University in Sakarya, Turkey
in 2010 with Dr Nurgül Keser as the Director and Dr Navin C Nanda as the International Director, it became clear that
there was a need to publish an up-to-date book on heart disease in women taking into account the fact there was hardly
any book on this subject. On our recommendation, Dr Nanda and Dr Keser undertook this difficult task and have come
up with a book that will emphasize and focus attention on various aspects of heart disease in women and how they
are underdiagnosed and undertreated compared to men. This will increase awareness and may spur efforts by various
government agencies to tackle these mostly unrecognized issues affecting women throughout the world.
Our heartfelt thanks to Dr Nanda and all the national and international contributors of this book for taking time off
from their busy schedule to collaborate on this very important project.
Prof (Dr) Muzaffer Elmas
President, Sakarya University
Sakarya, Turkey
14.
15. Preface
Cardiovascular disease represents the most common cause of death in women in both developed and developing
countries affecting high, middle and low income social strata. According to some data, more women die from
cardiovascular disease than men. Despite these impressive statistics published by the World Health Organization,
misperceptions are prevalent among both the lay public and medical professionals that cardiovascular disease is an
uncommon entity in women. This unawareness coupled with the fact that women may present with atypical symptoms
results in reduced surveillance, misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis and consequently under treatment of cardiovascular
disease, especially ischemic heart disease, in women. These issues were highlighted during an international conference
on women and health organized by the Sakarya University and the International Society of Cardiovascular Ultrasound
in Sakarya, Turkey in 2010. During this conference, it became clear to us that a book focusing on all aspects of heart
disease in women could prove invaluable to medical and paramedical professionals given the paucity of such books on
this subject. With this in mind we contacted several nationally and internationally renowned physicians, scientists and
cardiologists who readily agreed to contribute and we are most grateful to them for sharing their expertise by writing
excellent chapters for this book.
This book consists of a total of 34 chapters organized into 8 sections. The first two chapters by Rachana and Anand
Kulkarni deal in a succinct manner the myths and facts about cardiovascular disease in women and the important topic
of cardiovascular disease prevention. Both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors and guidelines for prevention
are discussed, with special reference to women. The third chapter by Sanne Peters and associates emphasizes
sex differences in the effects of leading and most prevalent risk factors in women. This is followed by a chapter on
dyslipidemia by Lale Tokgozoglu from Ankara, Turkey. Gopal Ghimire in the next chapter discusses various aspects of
familial hypercholesterolemia with special focus on women and highlights the guidelines proposed by the National Lipid
Association.MetabolicsyndromeisnextcoveredbySibelCatirliEnarandcolleagues.Theepidemiology,pathophysiology
and management of hypertension in women are elegantly summarized by Keith Ferdinand and Samar Nasser in the
following chapter (Chapter 7). They also cover the important topics of resistant and refractory hypertension. Cardiac
and non-cardiac causes of stroke in women are detailed in the next chapter by Nese Keser from Istanbul, Turkey. The
relationship of oral contraceptive pills and hormone replacement therapy to stroke as well as risk factors for stroke during
pregnancy are also discussed. Professors Nurgül Keser and Cevdet Erdöl in the next chapter discuss the deleterious effects
of smoking in women, especially younger women in whom the prevalence of smoking is alarmingly increasing in many
parts of the world. A special mention is made of the increasing use of waterpipe tobacco smoking in several countries of
Europe and the Middle East. Measures taken by government agencies to curb smoking are also mentioned. Job stress,
strain, burnout, unemployment and biomarkers and their relationship to some of these factors are delineated in Chapter
10 by Aryanna Jacobs and colleagues. The following chapter by Mackram Eleid and associates from the Mayo Clinic in
Rochester describe the role of autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and
antiphospholipid antibody syndrome in atherosclerotic plaque formation in the next chapter. The last chapter in this
section by Juliana Kling and associates is also from the Mayo Clinic and explains the effect of pregnancy and menopause
on cardiovascular function and points to the controversial relationship of menopausal hormone therapy to progression
of cardiovascular disease.
The second section of the book pertains to with coronary heart disease. The first chapter by Ezra Amsterdam provides
a perspective and overview of coronary heart disease in women. The second chapter (Chapter 14) by Kumar Sanam and
colleagues outlines the approach to assessment of chest pain in a woman presenting to the Emergency Department. The
clinical presentation, diagnostic testing, the use of biomarkers and differential diagnosis are given in detail. The third
chapter, from the group of Nanette Wenger, a renowned expert in heart disease in women, details all aspects of stable
ischemic heart disease in women including pathophysiology of gender differences in women, different terminologies
used, the scope of the burden, challenges in diagnosis and treatment strategies. The last chapter in this section, by Ankit
Mehra and Kul Aggarwal, explains different aspects of acute coronary syndromes including the pathophysiology of
16. xiv Heart Disease in Women
atherosclerotic plaque rupture and erosion and different modalities of treatment with special reference to management
in a pregnant woman.
Section 3 of the book deals with noninvasive testing. Jennifer Kiessling and colleagues from the University of
Alabama at Birmingham outline the use of echocardiography in the diagnosis of various acquired and congenital
structural heart lesions in women. In particular, the use of stress echocardiography in the assessment of coronary artery
disease is highlighted. Echocardiography in the pregnant woman and its usefulness in the assessment and management
of fetal cardiac anomalies are also delineated. The next chapter in this section (Chapter 18) by Francesca Mantovani and
associates outline factors affecting the accuracy of diagnostic testing in women and the advantages and disadvantages
of various modalities used for noninvasive stress testing including contrast stress echocardiography. The last chapter in
this section by Suman and Manish Tandon focuses in detail on the use of radionuclide stress imaging techniques in the
evaluation of ischemic heart disease. Radiation considerations are also mentioned.
The fourth section of this book relates to heart failure, cardiomyopathy and pericarditis in women. Cynthia Taub
and colleagues from Ileana Piña’s group provide a comprehensive review of the etiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic
assessment and management issues of heart failure in women in the first chapter of this section. Heart failure in
pregnancy is also covered. In the next chapter (Chapter 21), Anant Kharod reviews myocarditis and pericarditis with
particular emphasis in women. The etiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment options are discussed.
The last chapter of this section by Keli Chaviano and colleagues covers all aspects of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy which
is characteristically seen in postmenopausal women.
Section 5 of the book deals with arrhythmias in women. Deepika Narasimha and Anne Curtis describe in great detail
sex-based differences in the epidemiology, prevalence, clinical manifestation, and management of various types of
arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia. This chapter is followed by another one (Chapter 24)
by Anurag Singh which specifically discusses ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death in women.
The next section (Section 6) consists of chapters on rheumatic heart disease and valvular heart disease in women.
The first chapter by Anita Saxsena from New Delhi, India, highlights the problem of rheumatic heart disease in the
developing countries and the fact that rheumatic mitral stenosis is much more prevalent in women than men. Various
sequele of rheumatic heart disease including its management in pregnancy are given in this chapter. The next chapter
by Vijayalakshmi and Chitra Narasimhan provide a detailed review of valvular heart disease in women and this is
supplemented by a large number of illustrations depicting various pathological findings. Prosthetic valves are also
covered in this chapter. The last chapter in this section (Chapter 27) by Peter Block deals with gender differences in the
outcome of the relatively recently developed technique of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Section 7 of the book describes heart diseases in pregnancy and congenital cardiac lesions frequently seen in women.
The first chapter by Akila Subramaniam and Joseph Biggio mentions various physiological changes in the cardiovascular
system that occur during pregnancy as well as evaluation and management of acquired and congenital cardiac diseases
during pregnancy. A different perspective on the same subject is provided by Reema Chugh in the next chapter (Chapter 29).
Next, Lori Blauwet elegantly discusses all aspects of the important topic of peripartum cardiomyopathy. The last chapter
in this section, also by Reema Chugh, deals with congenital heart lesions in women. It represents a detailed review of
issues pertaining to acyanotic and cyanotic women with congenital heart disease.
The last section (Section 8) of the book covers miscellaneous topics. Peripheral arterial disease in women is reviewed
by Amy Pollak and Sharon Mulvagh. Diagnostic testing including the use of ankle-brachial index, gender differences
in its values and guidelines used in the management are provided in this chapter. Charu Gandotra, in the next chapter,
discusses cardiovascular implications of cancer in women. He focusses on commonly used chemotherapeutic agents
with potential for cardiac toxicity and various strategies employed for its identification and management. The last
chapter of this section and book (Chapter 34) by Stephanie El-Hajj, Navin C Nanda and Fadi G Hage provides a summary
of recently published literature on heart disease in women.
Because of the large number of contributors, some overlap of content and chapters is inevitable and does exist in
the book. However, deliberately, no attempt was made by us to correct this as it was felt that some of it could provide a
different perspective to the reader and would serve to reinforce important concepts and issues in the assessment of heart
disease in women.
Navin C Nanda
Nurgül Keser
17. AsmentionedinthePreface,wearemostgratefultoallthecontributorswhoprovidedexcellentchaptersforthisbook. We
also appreciate the encouragement provided by the Sakarya University and the International Society of Cardiovascular
Ultrasound in the preparation of this book. Special thanks to Shree Jitendar P Vij, CEO and Group Chairman of
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd, New Delhi, India and Mr Ankit Vij (Managing Director) for their help in
publishing this book and all their associates especially Ms Chetna Malhotra Vohra (Senior Manager–Business
Development) and Ms Saima Rashid (Development Editor). We also deeply appreciate the help of Lindy Chapman
(Administrative Associate) and Kanta Nanda.
Acknowledgments
18.
19. Contents
Section 1: Prevention and Risk Factors
1. Cardiovascular Disease in Women: Myths and
Facts about a Silent Epidemic 3
Rachana Kulkarni, Anand Kulkarni
2. Prevention of Heart Disease in Women 10
Rachana Kulkarni, Anand Kulkarni
•
• Unmodifiable Risk Factors 10
•
• Modifiable Risk Factors 11
•
• Lifestyle Risk Factors 12
•
• Guidelines for Prevention of CVD in Women 12
3. Sex Differences in the Effects of Leading and
Most Prevalent Modifiable Risk Factors 17
Sanne AE Peters, Yvonne T van der Schouw, Mark Woodward, Rachel R Huxley
4. Dyslipidemia in Women 30
Lale Tokgozoglu, Uğur Canpolat
•
• Evaluation and Treatment of Women with Hyperlipidemia 30
•
• Management of Dyslipidemia in Women: Translating
Evidence from Clinical Trials into Practice 30
•
• Management 33
5. Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Women:
Its Identification and Management 36
Gopal Ghimire, Navin C Nanda
•
• Identification of FH 37
•
• Management of FH 40
6. Cardiovascular Dysfunction in Women with Metabolic Syndrome 47
Sibel Catirli Enar, Anant Kharod, Navin C Nanda
•
• Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome 47
•
• Metabolic Syndrome in Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndrome 48
•
• Congestive Heart Failure 48
•
• Left Ventricular Dysfunction 48
•
• Diastolic Dysfunction 48
•
• Right Ventricular Dysfunction 49
•
• Left Atrial Dysfunction 49
•
• Atrial Flutter and Fibrillation 49
•
• Carotid Atherosclerosis 49
•
• Endothelial Dysfunction 50
•
• Hypertension 50
20. xviii Heart Disease in Women
•
• Hypothyroidism 51
•
• Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome 51
•
• Obstructive Sleep Apnea 51
7. Hypertension in Women 57
Keith C Ferdinand, Samar A Nasser
•
• Epidemiology Hypertension: Focus on Women 57
•
• Pathophysiology of Hypertension in Women 57
•
• Dietary Considerations 58
•
• Pharmacotherapy of Hypertension in Women 59
•
• Current Aspects of Resistant Hypertension: Definitions, Prevalence, and Outcomes 60
•
• Recognition of Refractory Hypertension: A Newer Concept and Call-to-Action 61
8. Stroke and Women 64
Nese Keser, Necati Sirmaci, Luis D Meggo Quiroz, Navin C Nanda
•
• Hormonal Effects 64
•
• Pregnancy and Stroke 65
•
• Oral Contraceptive Pills and Hormone Replacement Therapy 66
•
• Prevention of Stroke in Women 66
•
• Coronary Artery Disease and Aspirin 66
•
• Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke 66
9. Women and Smoking 70
Nurgül Keser, Cevdet Erdöl, Luis D Meggo Quiroz, Navin C Nanda
•
• Smoking: A Global Burden 70
•
• Pathophysiology 70
•
• Gender and Age Differences 71
•
• Clinical Implications 71
•
• Associated Exposures 72
•
• Public Policy 72
10. Job Burnout, Job Strain (Stress), and
Cardiovascular Disease: Selected Review 75
Aryana Jacobs, Zinzi Bailey, Michelle A Albert
•
• Common Theoretical Frameworks and Definitions Related to Job Stress and Job Burnout 75
•
• Job Burnout and CVD Studies 76
•
• Job Strain and CVD 77
•
• Influence of Psychological Status and Social Support on Job Strain and CVD Risk 78
•
• Unemployment and CVD Outcomes 78
•
• Job Strain and Select CVD Risk Equivalents 79
11. Atherosclerosis and Autoimmune Disease:
Mechanisms and Emerging Treatments 83
Mackram F Eleid, Sharon L Mulvagh, Rekha Mankad
12. Hormonal Transitions and the Cardiovascular System in Women 93
Juliana M Kling, Virginia M Miller, Sharon L Mulvagh
•
• Regulatory Mechanisms Contributing to Sex Differences in
Cardiovascular Physiology 93
•
• Sex-Specific Conditions Affecting Cardiovascular Disease in Women 94
21. xix
Contents
•
• Guidelines and Recommendations 96
•
• Phenotypic Expression of Cardiovascular Disease in Women 96
Section 2: Coronary Heart Disease
13. A Perspective on Women and Coronary Heart Disease 105
Ezra A Amsterdam
•
• Epidemiology 105
•
• Management 105
•
• Risk Factors for CHD 106
•
• Clinical Presentation 106
•
• Stress Testing 107
•
• Pathophysiology of Myocardial Ischemia 107
14. Chest Pain Evaluation in Women Presenting to
the Emergency Department 110
Kumar Sanam, Kelli Chaviano, Navin C Nanda
•
• Clinical Presentation 110
•
• Diagnostic Tests 111
•
• Imaging Studies 113
•
• Differential Diagnosis 116
15. Stable Ischemic Heart Disease in Women 118
Rebecca D Levit, Jane S Titterington, Nanette K Wenger
•
• Pathophysiology of Gender Differences in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease 118
•
• Terminology 120
•
• Epidemiology—Scope of the Problem 120
•
• Diagnostic Testing for SIHD 121
•
• Treatment of SIHD 122
•
• Burden of Angina 128
16. Acute Coronary Syndromes in Women 134
Ankit Mehra, Kul Aggarwal
•
• Pathophysiology 137
•
• Plaque Disruption 137
•
• Clinical Presentation 139
•
• Management 139
•
• Treatment 140
•
• Antiplatelet Agents 140
•
• Fibrinolytic Therapy 142
•
• Anticoagulants 142
•
• Oral Medications 143
•
• Coronary Angiography and PCI 143
•
• Outcomes 144
•
• Pregnancy and ACS 145
•
• Conditions Mimicking ACS 146
•
• Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection 146
•
• Aortic Dissection 147
•
• Pulmonary Embolism 148
22. xx Heart Disease in Women
Section 3: Noninvasive Testing
17. Echocardiography in Women 155
Jennifer Kiessling, Nurgül Keser, Navin C Nanda, Tugba Kemaloglu Oz,
Aylin Sungur, Kunal Bhagatwala, Nidhi Karia
•
• Ischemic Heart Disease/Stress Echocardiography/Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome 155
•
• Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy 160
•
• Echocardiography in Pregnancy, Peripartum Cardiomyopathy, and Fetal Echocardiography 162
•
• Congenital Heart Disease 168
•
• Pulmonary Hypertension 170
•
• Structural Heart Disease: MVP, Mitral Stenosis, and Mitral Annular Calcification 170
•
• Differences in Echocardiographic Measurements and Technical Considerations 176
•
• Other Echo Examples of Pathological Conditions Seen in Women 181
18. Noninvasive Stress Testing in Women 192
Francesca Mantovani, Sahar S Abdelmoneim, Victoria Zysek, Sharon L Mulvagh
•
• Exercise Electrocardiography 193
•
• Imaging Techniques during Stress Testing 195
•
• Stress Echocardiography 195
•
• Stress Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT 199
•
• Cardiac PET 199
•
• MPI vs SE 200
•
• Emerging Stress Test Imaging Modalities in Women with
Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: MRI 200
•
• Recommendations for Noninvasive Testing in Women with
Suspected Coronary Artery Disease 200
19. Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging—Diagnosis and Risk Assessment in Women 206
Suman Tandon, Manish Tandon
•
• Evaluating Clinical Risk 206
•
• Exercise Treadmill Test in the Diagnosis and Risk Assessment of Suspected CAD 207
•
• SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging 209
•
• PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging 211
•
• Flow Quantification with PET 212
•
• Radiation Considerations 213
Section 4: Heart Failure. Cardiomyopathy. Pericarditis
20. Women and Heart Failure 221
Cynthia C Taub, Julie J Ramos, Mary L Rosser, Sobia Mujtaba, Ileana L Piña
•
• Sex Differences in the Manifestation and Outcome of Cardiovascular Disease:
Experimental Evidence from Animal Models 222
•
• Conditions that Contribute to Heart Failure 223
•
• Assessment of Heart Failure 228
•
• Management of Heart Failure 229
•
• Transition of Care 240
•
• Implications from Clinical Trials 241
23. xxi
Contents
21. Myocarditis and Pericarditis in Women 252
Anant Kharod, Navin C Nanda
•
• Defining Sex and Gender 252
•
• History And Epidemiology of Myocarditis 252
•
• Sex Differences in Normal Cardiac Physiology 253
•
• Sex Hormones and the Immune System 254
•
• Myocarditis, What We Know 254
•
• Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Treatment 255
•
• Pericarditis in Women 257
•
• Pericarditis: Symptoms and Diagnosis 257
•
• Pericarditis: Treatment 257
22. Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy in Women 262
Kelli Chaviano, Kumar Sanam, Navin C Nanda
•
• Variants 262
•
• Epidemiology 263
•
• Etiology 263
•
• Precipitating Events and Risks 264
•
• Presentation 265
•
• Diagnosis 265
•
• Treatment 266
•
• Prognosis 266
Section 5: Arrhythmias
23. Arrhythmias and Implantable Devices in Women 271
Deepika Narasimha, Anne B Curtis
•
• Cardiac Electrophysiology 271
•
• Diagnostic Testing 272
•
• Specific Arrhythmias 273
•
• Pharmacotherapy 280
•
• Implantable Device Therapy 281
•
• Arrhythmias in Pregnancy 283
24. Ventricular Arrhythmia in Women 288
Anurag Singh, Navin C Nanda
•
• Gender Differences in Mechanism of Ventricular Arrhythmias 289
•
• Coronary Artery Disease 289
•
• Dilated Cardiomyopathy 289
•
• Long QT Syndromes 289
•
• Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 290
•
• Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy 290
•
• Brugada Syndrome 291
•
• Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia 291
•
• Idiopathic Ventricular Tachycardia 291
•
• Special Considerations in Management of Female Patients 291
24. xxii Heart Disease in Women
Section 6:Valvular Heart Disease
25. Rheumatic Heart Disease in Women 295
Anita Saxena
•
• Burden of the Disease 295
•
• Gender Differences 295
•
• Etiopathogenesis 296
•
• Clinical Features 296
•
• Mitral Stenosis 296
•
• Mitral Regurgitation 297
•
• Aortic Regurgitation 297
•
• Aortic Stenosis 298
•
• Tricuspid Valve Disease 298
•
• Multivalvular Disease 298
•
• Diagnostic Evaluation 298
•
• Echocardiography in Rheumatic Heart Disease 300
•
• Cardiac Catheterization 305
•
• Management of Women with Rheumatic Heart Disease 305
•
• Gender and Prognosis 306
•
• Pregnancy and Rheumatic Heart Disease 306
•
• Risk Assessment 307
•
• General Principles of Management 307
•
• Pregnancy with Mitral Stenosis 307
•
• Other Valvular Lesions during Pregnancy 308
•
• Pregnancy with Prosthetic Heart Valves 308
26. Native Valvular Heart Disease in Women 311
IB Vijayalakshmi, Chitra Narasimhan
•
• Mitral Stenosis 312
•
• Mitral Regurgitation 316
•
• Aortic Stenosis 318
•
• Aortic Regurgitation 323
•
• Tricuspid Stenosis 324
•
• Tricuspid Regurgitation 325
•
• Pulmonic Stenosis 326
•
• Pulmonic Regurgitation 326
•
• VHD in Pregnancy 326
•
• General Management of Women with VHD 329
•
• Infective Endocarditis 337
27. Gender Differences in Outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement 344
Peter C Block
•
• Gender Differences in Cardiac Surgery 344
•
• Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement 344
•
• Possible Mechanisms 346
25. xxiii
Contents
Section 7: Pregnancy. Congenital Heart Disease
28. Pregnancy and Heart Disease 351
Akila Subramaniam, Joseph R Biggio
•
• Physiologic Changes in the Cardiovascular System during Pregnancy 351
•
• General Evaluation and Management of Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy 352
•
• Congenital Heart Disease 355
•
• Pulmonary Hypertension 357
•
• Valvular Heart Disease 357
•
• Cardiomyopathy 358
•
• Idiopathic Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 359
•
• Ischemic Heart Disease and Coronary Artery Disease 359
•
• Cardiac Transplantation 360
•
• Arrhythmia 360
•
• Genetic Causes of Cardiovascular Disease 360
•
• Infective Endocarditis and Prophylaxis in Pregnancy 361
•
• Artificial Heart Valves and Pregnancy 361
29. Management of Heart Disease in Pregnancy:
A Clinician's Approach 368
Reema Chugh
•
• Common Cardiovascular Management Issues in Pregnancy 369
•
• Hypertension in Pregnancy 369
•
• Deep Venous Thrombosis 372
•
• Anticoagulation 373
•
• Endocarditis 374
•
• Heart Failure 374
•
• Arrhythmias 379
•
• Aortic Root Dilation 387
•
• Pulmonary Hypertension 389
•
• Common Heart Diseases/Defects during Pregnancy 390
•
• Valvular Heart Disease 391
•
• Coronary Artery Disease 393
•
• Cardiac Surgery in Pregnancy 396
•
• Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Pregnancy 397
•
• Preconception Assessment and Counseling 397
•
• Maternal Risk Assessment 397
•
• Fetal Risk Assessment 398
•
• Antenatal Cardiac Assessment and Management 398
•
• Labor and Delivery 400
30. Peripartum Cardiomyopathy 407
Lori A Blauwet
•
• Epidemiology 407
•
• Risk Factors 408
•
• Genetics 408
26. xxiv Heart Disease in Women
•
• Proposed Etiologies and Pathophysiological Mechanisms 409
•
• Clinical Presentation 410
•
• Diagnosis 412
•
• Natural History 414
•
• Treatment 414
•
• Labor and Delivery 419
•
• Breastfeeding 420
•
• Contraception 420
•
• Prognosis 420
•
• Subsequent Pregnancy 421
31. Congenital Heart Disease in Women 427
Reema Chugh
•
• Transitional Issues in Females with CHD 427
•
• Medical Records 428
•
• Gynecological Health and Contraception in Women with CHD 429
•
• Pregnancy in CHD 430
•
• Common Medical Issues in CHD 430
•
• Exercise Counseling 430
•
• Congenital Heart Defects 430
•
• Shunt Lesions 431
•
• Congenital Valvular Heart Defects 438
•
• Complex Congenital Heart Defects 450
•
• Cyanotic Congenital Heart Disease 465
Section 8: Miscellaneous
32. Peripheral Arterial Disease in Women: The Unmet Challenge 479
Amy West Pollak, Sharon L Mulvagh
•
• How is Peripheral Arterial Disease Diagnosed? 479
•
• Who Should Be Screened for PAD with an ABI? 479
•
• Cardiovascular Risk Factor Modification in PAD 480
•
• Treatment of Symptomatic PAD 481
•
• Is There a Sex-Based Difference in the Burden of PAD? 481
•
• Why are Sex-Based Differences Important? 482
•
• What are the Critical Steps Needed to Raise Awareness about PAD in Women? 482
33. Cardiovascular Implications of Cancer in Women 485
Charu Gandotra
•
• Incidence and Mortality of Cancer in Women 485
•
• Disparities in Cancer Epidemiology 485
•
• Common Risk Factors for Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease 485
•
• Cancer Chemotherapy Cardiotoxicity: Spectrum of Cardiovascular Effects 487
•
• Breast Cancer Chemotherapy 488
•
• Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy 491
•
• Lung Cancer 492
•
• Thoracic Radiation Therapy 492
27. xxv
Contents
•
• Monitoring and Diagnosis of Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity 493
•
• Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Related Cardiotoxicity 494
•
• Cancer Survivors 494
34. Heart Disease in Women: An Update on Recently Published Literature 499
Stephanie El-Hajj, Navin C Nanda, Fadi G Hage
•
• Risk Factors 499
•
• Pregnancy 503
•
• Awareness 503
•
• Symptoms 503
•
• Stress Testing 504
•
• Noninvasive Management 505
•
• Invasive Management 506
Index 515
30. Rachana Kulkarni, Anand Kulkarni
Cardiovascular Disease in
Women: Myths and Facts
about a Silent Epidemic
1
C H A P T E R
INTRODUCTION
Cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly, ischemic heart
disease, is the leading cause of death among women in
the United States and around the globe. As the average
life span is increasing in the developed countries, so is the
prevalence of heart disease. In the United States, because
of an aging population, the absolute number of deaths
due to CVD in women is actually increasing.1
As the risk
of CVD increases linearly with age, CVD is the leading
cause of hospital admissions as well, and has significant
financial implications. Because of the sheer magnitude of
this problem, there is a need for increased awareness of
the importance of CVD as a major public health issue for
women across the world.
Let us start by examining some statistics about heart
disease in women in the United States.
Each year on an average 43 million American women
are affected by heart disease. It roughly translates into
heart disease killing one woman per minute. Center for
Disease Control (CDC) data indicate that heart disease is
the leading cause of death among women in the United
States, killing 292,188 women in 2009—i.e. one in every
four female deaths.
Since the last scientific statement on this topic in
1993, when the gender gap in various aspects of CVD was
brought to light, a lot of attention has been given to a better
appreciation of the influence of gender on heart disease
and its management. In spite of that effort, however,
important gaps in knowledge remain.
Heart disease in women presents a decade later as
compared with men. But as women have a higher likeli
hood to survive longer, the death rates in women due to
CVD tends to be equal or higher as compared with the
men.1
Also, as indicated by the Framingham Heart study, two-
thirds of the women who had sudden cardiac death had
no previous symptoms. Since majority of the women never
make it to the hospital, presumably because of the lack of
awareness of their heart symptoms, raising awareness of
heart disease in women and directing the focus on primary
prevention seem to be the best approach.
Cardiovascular disease has been the leading cause of
death among women worldwide. It has been shown very
well in the data presented by World Health Organization
(WHO) in 2011. The organization studied the 10 leading
causes of death among women in the countries with
different income levels. The results are outlined below
(Figs. 1A to E).
It is evident from the above-mentioned data that heart
disease is the leading cause of death in women around the
globe, regardless of the level of income.
Because of the worldwide extent of this health problem
and its implications on the world health economics, in 2010,
the WHO launched a worldwide effort to draw urgent
attention to the number one killer for women. WHO Assis
tant Director-General Dr. Catherine Le Gales-Camus poin
ted out that.
“Although most women fear cancer, particularly breast
cancer, they do not make the same efforts to safeguard
themselves from heart disease, which is eminently preven
table.”
As Dr. Le Gales-Camus has stated, heart disease is the
most common cause of fatality in women everywhere.
However, in spite of clear evidence, most women still con
sider breast cancer as their number one threat.
We, as physicians, know that the anatomy and physio
logy of the heart is the same in men and women. Then, we
wonder, why would there be a difference in heart disease
31. 4 Section 1 Prevention and Risk Factors
Figs. 1A to E: WHO Media center—Women’s health, Fact Sheet
N0 334, September 2013, Data source for charts: Cause specific
mortality: regional estimates for 2000-2011.
A
C
E
B
D
in men and women at every step from the diagnosis to
prognosis.
The differences in heart disease in men and women are
due to the differences in the perception and presentation
of the disease which then leads to the differences in the
treatment and follow ups. These in turn ultimately result in
the differences in prognosis and survival.
Let us examine some of the common myths that
women and communities harbor about heart disease.
Myth—Heart disease is a man’s disease.
32. 5
Chapter 1 Cardiovascular Disease in Women: Myths and Facts about a Silent Epidemic
Fact—Heart disease kills more women than men. Since
1984, each year more women have died of heart disease
than men (Fig. 2).
Since 1984, women have outnumbered men in cardio
vascular mortality, and the gap continues to widen each
year. Yet only one in five women thinks that heart disease
is a real threat to them.1
Despite increased awareness over the past decade,
only 54% of women recognize that heart disease is their
number one killer2
(Fig. 3).
Myth—Breast cancer kills more women than heart
disease.
Fact—Most women perceive breast cancer as their
biggest threat and are diligent about their yearly breast
examination and mammograms. However, the fact is that
heartdiseasekillsmorewomenthanallcancerscombined.
Studies show that on an average one in 25 women will die
of cancer and one in two women will die of heart disease.1
Myth—Heart disease is a disease of old men.
Fact—Increased incidence of smoking and use of
birth control pills have increased the incidence of heart
disease in women under 55 years of age. More than 50%
of myocardial infarction (MI) in women is attributable to
smoking.
Althoughtheprevalenceofsmokinghasbeendeclining
in the United States, the rate of smoking cessation is lower
in women than men;1
and after 2000, smoking rates have
been higher in women (23%) than men (20%).3
The increased prevalence of smoking and the increas
ing trend of smoking particularly in young women have
definitely contributed to the higher rates of CVD and
cardiac deaths in women. Deaths of young women have
significant implications on the families and economics
alike. Smoking also increases their risk for hypertension.
A Norwegian study conducted by Meyer et al.4
demons
trated that smoking significantly increases cardiovascular
and stroke risks in all the age groups in the 54,000 patients
studied over three decades. However, it also showed that
women who smoked had a higher incidence of cardio
vascular mortality and morbidity as compared with the
men who smoked.4
The longitudinal study showed that
two-thirds of the men who smoked had CVD, whereas half
of the women who smoked suffered with cardiovascular
disease (Fig. 4).
Another variable known to have increased the risk
of heart disease in women is the lack of physical activity
leading to the increased incidence of obesity. The preva
lence of obesity has increased steadily in women over the
last two decades; and according to the 2007 estimates from
the National Center for Health Statistics of the Center for
Disease Control and Prevention, 60% of the adult women
in the United States are overweight. Just over one-thirds of
the overweight adult women are obese.5
In the last decade,
approximately 34 million American women are classified
as obese. Obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, is an
important risk factor for CVD in women.6,7
The figure
below (Fig. 5) illustrates the CDC data on obesity trends
among the adults in the United States in 2011–2012.8
Age-adjusted prevalence of obesity, by sex and age
group, among adults at the age of 20 years and over: United
States, 2011–2012.
Fig. 2: AHA Statistical Update. Heart Disease and Stroke Statis-
tics—2011 Update. A Report from the AHA. Circulation. 2011;123:
4e18-e209.
Source: Adapted from Rosamond 2008 and Roger 2011.
Fig. 3: National Center of Heart Statistics and the American Heart
Association. Mosca et al. Circulation. 1997;96:2468-2482.
33. 6 Section 1 Prevention and Risk Factors
Increased prevalence of obesity has translated into
increased risk of type two diabetes, which then increases
the risk of heart disease, several folds.9
Diabetes is asso
ciated with a threefold to sevenfold elevation in coronary
heart disease risk among women, compared with a twofold
to threefold elevation among men; this gender-based
difference may be because of a particularly deleterious
effect of diabetes on lipids and blood pressure in women.5
Approximately 50% of the deaths in patients with type two
diabetes is usually due to ischemic heart disease.10
In addition to the above-mentioned misperceptions,
the symptoms of heart disease in women could be atypical.
In addition to the traditional symptom of chest pain,
women present with shortness of breath as a common
presenting symptom. Other common symptoms are jaw or
shoulder pain, dizziness, nausea, unexplained fatigue, or
flu like symptoms.11
Obviously these symptoms are vague
and so a lot of women tend to ignore them and do not seek
medical attention. Because of the ambiguous and atypical
nature of the symptoms, they are likely to be ignored by the
healthcare professionals as well. So, it comes as no surprise
that the Framingham Heart Study revealed that two-thirds
of the sudden cardiac deaths occurred in women with no
“known” previous symptoms as compared with only half
of the sudden deaths in men.1
The 2012 statistical report
from the American Heart Association (AHA) confirms the
same finding.12
As for physicians, most of our practice guidelines and
textbooks use data obtained in major clinical trials. Since
women were involved in less than 25% of clinical trials, the
data derived from them comprised of symptoms mostly of
men, which then became the basis of traditional medical
teaching and practice guidelines. As a result of that,
physicians also did not identify and associate the above-
mentioned symptoms with heart disease.
This gap in acknowledging symptoms of heart disease
by patients and physicians has led to delays in diagnosis
and seeking and delivering care by patients and physicians
alike. So, it is no wonder that more women than men have
cardiac arrest as their presenting symptom. It may explain
why treatment is less likely to reduce death rate in women
as most of them never reach a hospital.13
However, a recent
review of literature about the evaluation of chest pain in
women suggests that it is advisable to stratify patients in
low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories based on
their cardiovascular risk factors, which will then guide the
physician to seek appropriate diagnostic measures in a
cost-effective manner.14
The 2011 updated effectiveness-
based guidelines for primary and secondary prevention
of CVD in women provide a very helpful algorithm for
the workup to evaluate cardiovascular risk in women.
This flow diagram is illustrated in the chapter by the same
authors about the prevention of heart disease in women.15
Fig. 4: Stampfer MJ, Hu FB, Manson JE, Rimm EB, Willett WC.
Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women through
diet and lifestyle. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jul 6;343(1):16-22.
Source: Adapted from Stampfer 2000.
Fig. 5: CDC data—Age-adjusted prevalence of obesity, by sex
and age group, among adults aged 20 and over: United States,
2011-2012.
1
Crude estimate 35.1%.
2
Significant difference from the age of 20 to 39 years.
3
Significant difference from the age of 40 to 59 years.
Note: Estimates are age adjusted for all adults of the age 20 years
and over by the direct method to the 2000 U.S. census population
using the age groups 20–39, 40–59, and 60 and over.
Source: CDC/NCHS, National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey, 2011–2012.
34. 7
Chapter 1 Cardiovascular Disease in Women: Myths and Facts about a Silent Epidemic
Heart disease in women presents a decade later
as compared with men. As a result, women have more
com
orbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, and hyper
lipidemia among others. This puts them at a higher risk
for having a more complex clinical picture at the time of
presentation and makes them more likely to have com
plications. Sometimes, the advanced and diffuse nature of
the disease at presentation can limit the treatment options
for the physicians.
The NIH study performed in 2012 shows a clear gender
gap in the treatment of heart disease. The study indicates
that for a variety of reasons women get less invasive
treatment as compared with men.16
They are less likely to
be offered with less-invasive therapy, and when offered,
they are also more likely to decline the invasive treatment.
If they undergo invasive procedures, they are more likely
to have complications. After cardiac surgery, they are less
likely to opt for rehab and are less likely to follow up.
These findings were almost replicated in a French
study by Leurent17
of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
in Rennes, France. Compared with men, women had a
significantly higher rate of intrahospital mortality from MI
at 9% versus 4.4% (P <0.0001). The study further identified
the lack of timely aggressive treatment in women. Women
also had a significantly longer median delay between
onset of MI symptoms and calling for medical assistance
(60 versus 44 min, P <0.0001). Female patients also had
significantly more STEMI (S-T elevation myocardial infarc
tion) complications than men, including atrial fibrillation
(7% versus 3%, P <0.0001). Leurent et al.17
also found that
women were less likely to be discharged on recommended
therapies than men:17
• Aspirin: 95% versus 98%, P <0.0001
• Clopidogrel/prasugrel: 93% versus 95%, P <0.0001
• Beta-blockers: 88% versus 91%, P = 0.001
• Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors: 62%
versus 67%, P <0.0001
• Statins: 89% versus 95%, P <0.0001
• Cardiovascular rehabilitation: 27% versus 47%,
P <0.0001.
All of these factors translate into worse prognosis for
women. They have higher fatality rate than men with the
first MI. It is very interesting to see how the gender gap
continues through the course. In the Framingham study
and the more recent Multicenter Investigation of the
limitation of Infarct Size study, women have been shown
to have higher in-house mortality rate (13%) as compared
with men (7%). By the first year after MI, the mortality
was 44% in women as compared with 23% in men. By the
second year, the gap continues, as mortality in women
was 36% as compared with 21% in men.18
Women were
also more likely to have subsequent cardiac events as
compared with men.19
The data from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and
Intervention registry also indicate that the gender gap
in mortality in patients presenting with acute MI can
be attributable to women receiving less-acute coro
nary interventions.20,21
Similar findings were noted in a
community study—Atherosclerotic Risk in Communities
study.22
A national survey shows that women are also less likely
to enrol in cardiac rehabilitation after MI (6.9% versus
13.3%) and coronary artery bypass surgery (20.2% versus
24.6%) than men.23
In addition to lower attendance rate,
dropout rates from cardiac rehabilitation are also higher in
women than men.24
World Health Organization and the Indian Council
of Medical Research collaborated to study heart disease
in women.3
The study showed that urbanization in deve
loping countries has added several new variables to the
traditional risk factors. As more women are entering the
office work force, it has led to a lack of physical activity
and an increased consumption of fast food and restaurant
cooked food, which tends to have higher caloric content,
which can translate into weight gain. Other factors
that may increase cardiovascular risks are increased
prevalence of smoking, rise in the use of birth control
measures, and consumption of alcohol. All of these factors
have contributed to the increased risk of heart disease in
the urban women population in the developing countries.
In 1997, the AHA commissioned a survey to study
the awareness of heart disease in women and the health
care community. The study identified and recognized a
significant gap and lack of awareness about heart disease
in women in the general population and healthcare
providers alike.25
“This is a missed opportunity,” said Lori
Mosca, MD, MPH, PhD, lead author of the study. “Habits
established in younger women can have lifelong rewards.
We need to speak to the new generation, and help them
understand that living heart healthy is going to help them
feel better, not just help them live longer. So often the
message is focused on how many women are dying from
heart disease, but we need to be talking about how women
are going to live—and live healthier.”
As a result of this gap, in 2003, AHA started the “Go Red
for Women” initiative. The purpose was to raise awareness
of heart disease in women, physicians, and communities.
35. 8 Section 1 Prevention and Risk Factors
The “Red Dress,” which is a symbol of the “Go Red for
Women” initiative, is meant to be a red alert for women
to be aware of the risks of heart disease in them and to
take action to protect them. Fortunately, this initiative
has been a great success. It has helped to bring this issue
at the forefront of scientific discussions and has captured
the attention of news media. A comparative analysis of
the awareness in women about the aforementioned issue
in 1997 and 2012 shows that in 1997, only 30% of women
identified heart disease as the leading cause of death. By
2012, however, the percentage of women acknowledging
the same rose to 56%. In 1997, 35% women listed breast
cancer as their biggest threat and by 2012 that number had
dropped to 24%. The number of women who identified
heart disease as a leading cause of death in women has
doubled in the last 10 years.
With WHO recognizing the impact of heart disease in
womenasapreventableglobalissue,manyothercountries
have started taking measures to evaluate this problem at
their national level.
Heart disease is a threat to women and their families
across the globe. As is evident from the data presented
here, it is mostly preventable. Because of the enormous
social and economic implications of heart disease in
women, more countries need to dedicate resources to raise
awareness of heart disease in women and physicians alike,
so that measures can be taken to stop this silent epidemic.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are thankful for the support and guidance of Dr. Navin
Nanda. We appreciate the assistance of Mr. Aditya Kulkarni
BA, MPH.
REFERENCES
1. American Heart Association. 1997 Heart and Stroke Facts:
Statistical Update. Dallas, Tex: American Heart Association;
1996.
2. Mosca L, Mochari-Greenberger H, Dolor RJ, et al. Twelve-
year follow-up of American women’s awareness of cardio
vascular disease risk and barriers to heart health. Circ
Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3:120-127.
3. Surveillance for selected tobacco-use behaviors—United
States, 1900–1994. Morb Mortal Week Rep. 1994;43(SS-3):
1-43.
4. Meyer H. Tremendous impact of smoking on mortality
and cardiovascular disease,. Europian Society of Cardio
logy University of Oslo and Norwegian Institute of Public
Health; 2009.
5. Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public
health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention and the American College of
Sports Medicine. JAMA. 1995;273:402-07.
6. Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, et al. A prospective
study of obesity and risk of coronary heart disease in
women. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:882-9.
7. Folsom AR, Daye SS, Sellers TA, et al. Body fat distri
bution and 5-year risk of death in older women. JAMA.
1993;269:483-7.
8. National Institutes of Health. Clinical guidelines on the
identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and
obesity in adults: The evidence report. Obes Res. 1998;6
suppl 2:51s-209s.
9. Manson JE, Spelsberg A. Risk modification in the diabetic
patient. In: Manson JE, Ridker PM, Gaziano JM, Hennekens
CH (Eds). Prevention of Myocardial Infarction. New York,
NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.pp. 241-73.
10. Geiss LS, Herman WH, Smith PJ. Mortality in non-insulin-
dependent diabetes. Diabetes in America. National Insti
tutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive
and Kidney Disease; 1995. pp. 249-50.
11. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. What are the
signs and symptoms of heart disease? [online]Available
from: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/hdw/signs.
html. [Accessed July, 2013].
12. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and
stroke statistics—2012 update: a report from the American
Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125(1):e2-220.
13. Kochanek KD, Xu JQ, Murphy SL, et al. Deaths: final data
for 2009 [PDF-2M]. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2011;
60(3).
14. Douglas PS, Ginsburg GS. The evaluation of chest pain in
women. N Engl J Med. 1996;344:1311-15.
15. Mosca et al. Circulation. 2011;123:1243-62.
16. Claassen M, Sybrandy KC, Appelman YE, et al. World J
Cardiol. 2012;4(2):36-47.
17. Leurent, G, Garlantézec R, Auffret V, et al. Gender differ
ences in presentation, management and in hospital out
come in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial
infarction: data from 5,000 patients included in the ORBI
prospective French regional registry. Arch Cardiovasc Dis.
2014;107(5):291-8.
18. Kannel WB, Wilson PW. Risk factors that attenuate the
female coronary disease advantage. Arch Intern Med. 1995;
155:57-61.
19. Tofler GH, Stone PH, Muller JE, et al. Effects of gender
and race on prognosis after myocardial infarction: adverse
prognosis for women, particularly black women. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1987;9:473-82.
20. Kudenchuk P, Maynard C, Martin J, et al. Comparison of
presentation, treatment, and outcome of acute myocardial
infarction in men versus women (the Myocardial Infarc
tion Triage and Intervention Registry). Am J Cardiol. 1996;
78:9-14.
36. 9
Chapter 1 Cardiovascular Disease in Women: Myths and Facts about a Silent Epidemic
21. Douglas PS, Ginsburg GS. The evaluation of chest pain in
women. N Engl J Med. 1996;344:1311-15.
22. Weitzman S, Cooper L, Chambless L, et al. Gender, racial,
and geographic differences in the performance of cardiac
diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for hospitalized
acute myocardial infarction in four states. Am J Cardiol.
1997;79:722-26.
23. Thomas RJ, Miller NH, Lamendola C, et al. National survey
on gender differences in cardiac rehabilitation prog
rams:
patient characteristics and enrollment patterns. J Cardio
pulm Rehabil. 1996;16:402-12.
24. Cannistra LB, Balady GJ, O’Malley CJ, et al. Comparison
of the clinical profile and outcome of women and men in
cardiac rehabilitation. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:1274-79.
25. Allender S, Lacey B, Webster P, et al. Level of urbanization
and noncommunicable disease risk factors in Tamil Nadu,
India. Bull WHO. 2010;88:297-304.
37. Rachana Kulkarni, Anand Kulkarni
Prevention of
Heart Disease in Women
2
C H A P T E R
An apple a day, keeps the doctor away. But does it prevent
heart disease? Is it true that increased consumption of
fruits can prevent heart disease? What about antioxidants
then? What works? And does it matter? Isn’t heart disease
a disease of men and women who need not worry about it?
There are many myths about heart disease in women.
Let us try to get some clarity on this.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the number one killer
of women. CVD kills more women than stroke, lung cancer,
breast cancer, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(COPD) combined.1
Statistics state that every third death
is from CVD. One in six deaths results from coronary artery
disease (CAD). A great deal of progress has been made
since 1999 in the prevention and treatment of heart disease
in women.2
The good news is that age-adjusted mortality
from heart disease decreased from 1980 to 2002 in men
(52%) and women (49%). The badnewsis thatwe areseeing
a reversal in that trend. Heart disease death rate among the
women of 35–54 years of age in the United States is now
increasing. This may be because of the changes in several
risk factors leading to CAD.3
Women all over the world are
now entering the work force. More sedentary life style is
being adopted, leading to obesity and diabetes. Smoking
rates are on the rise. A lot needs to be done to reverse this
trend.
To decrease CVD related mortality, it is not enough to
work only on prevention. Along with the measures to be
taken to prevent heart disease in women, it is also necessary
to increase awareness of this leading cause of death. In the
United States, for example, public awareness of CVD as
the leading cause of death has increased to 54% in 2009. It
was only 30% in 1997.4
It is important that women should
call for help at the onset of cardiac symptoms to improve
survival from cardiac events. In a recent survey by the
American Heart Association (AHA), only 53% of women
said that the first thing they would do if they thought they
were having a heart attack was to call 911.4
Women need to
be aware of high prevalence of heart disease, symptoms of
heart disease, and of the need to seek immediate help at
the onset of symptoms.
Prevention of heart disease hinges on understanding
the risk factors and then efforts to modulate them. These
risk factors are commonly divided into those that can be
modified to decrease the risk and those that cannot be
modified.
UNMODIFIABLE RISK FACTORS
Age
Prevalence of heart disease increases with age. This is
true in men as well as in women. It is seen that the first
presentation of CAD occurs approximately 10 years later in
women than in men. The INTERHEART study performed
in 42 countries around the world shows that a difference
of 8–10 years in age at the onset is seen widely around the
world (Table 1).5
It is thought that before menopause, women are protec
ted from development of atherosclerotic cardio
vascular
disease (ASCVD) because of the presence of estrogen. This
explanation is very attractive but it should be remembered
that in clinical practice, the replacement of estrogen after
menopause does not prevent cardio
vascular events and is
a Class 3 indication according to the Effectiveness Based
Guidelines for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in
Women.6-10
38. 11
Chapter 2 Prevention of Heart Disease in Women
Family History
Genetic contribution to heart disease is well-known and it
is well documented that CAD and death from CVD have a
hereditary component.
The genetic transmission in families is rarely monogenic
with a Mendelian pattern. More commonly, it is complex
reflecting multiple genes, each contributing modestly to
a predisposition to atherosclerosis and atherothrombotic
events. The statistical association of gene variants with
coronary disease differs in men and women, suggesting
that different pathways may operate in the manifestation
of CVD between men and women. In women, stromely
sin 1 (a member of matrix metalloproteinase family of
enzymes) and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) are
thought to be important. In men, two different genes are
associated with MI—the gap junction protein Connexin
37 and p22(phox), a component of NAD(P)H redox
system.11
The different manifestations may be because
of the presence of circulating estrogens or presence or
absence of the Y chromosome. Only limited work has
explored sex differences in gene expression, proteomics,
or metabolomics. Further work in these areas may provide
important insights into the development, diagnosis, and
tailored treatment of CVD in the two sexes.12
MODIFIABLE RISK FACTORS
Hypertension
High blood pressure (BP) is long known to be associated
with risk of development of CVD and CAD. In a meta-
analysis of 61 prospective studies published in the journal
Lancet in 2002, more than one million healthy adults were
studied between the age of 49 and 89 years. CAD risk was
slightly higher in women than men. Hypertension (HTN)
is increasing in the United States in both sexes but more so
in women who have 15% higher prevalence than men.13,14
Under the age of 35 years, HTN was more prevalent
in men than in women. The prevalence of HTN increases
with age in both sexes, but from the age of 45 to 54 years,
the rate of rise was greater in women than in men. After the
age of 65 years, a higher percentage of women than men
have HTN and the gap increases with continued age.15
The difference in prevalence reaches statistical significance
at 75 years of age.
The problem does not stop there. Not only the preva
lence increases with age, women are more likely to be
undertreated. In the National Health and Nutrition Exami
nation Survey (NHANES) over time (1988–1994 and
follow up survey 1999–2000), in men, the treatment rate
increased by 9.8% and control rate by 15.3%. In women,
the treatment rate increased by a mere 1.9% and control
rate by only 0.5%.16
This lack of improvement is really
concerning.
Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk of CVD in
women. Diabetes is a risk factor for the development
and severity of CAD in both men and women but carries
a greater risk in women that completely eliminates “the
female advantage.”17,18
CVD is twice as common in women
with DM compared with those without DM. Diabetic
women are four times as likely to be hospitalized as com
pared with nondiabetics.
Prevalence of DM is increasing rapidly in the United
States. Between 1990 and 2001, it rose by 61%.1
In 2006, out
of 17 million patients with known DM, 9.5 million were
Table 1: Comparison of age at first myocardial infarction
Region
Median age
women
Median age
men
Western Europe 68 61
Central and Eastern Europe 68 59
North America 64 58
South America and Mexico 65 59
Australia and New Zealand 66 58
Middle East 57 50
Africa 56 52
South Asia 60 52
China 67 60
Southeast Asia and Japan 63 55
Ethnic origin
European 68 59
Chinese 67 60
South Asian 60 50
Other Asian 63 55
Arab 57 52
Latin American 64 58
Black African 54 52
Colored African 58 52
Other 63 53
Overall 65 56
Source: Modified from Yusuf S et al, the INTERHEART Study.5
39. 12 Section 1 Prevention and Risk Factors
women (more than 50%). It is also seen that women are
less likely to be treated to HbA1c goal than men are.1
Hyperlipidemia
Hyperlipidemia, a known risk factor for the development
of CAD, is not much more common in women at a young
age. According to a statistic from the AHA, 47% of the
women have total serum cholesterol of 200 mg/dL or more
and 31.7% have low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol
level of 130 mg/dL or more. This is similar to the general
population. Only 6.7% of women have high-density
lipoprotein (HDL) of less than 40 when compared with
15.5% of overall Americans.
Things begin to change around menopause. Total chol
esterol and LDL cholesterol increase on an average by
about 10% from levels at 6 months before menopause.
Menopause affects HDL cholesterol less dramatically.
HDL concentration declines gradually in the two years
before menopause and then levels off after menopause.
The postmenopausal increase in CVD risk may result
partly from these lipid profile changes.
LIFESTYLE RISK FACTORS
Obesity and Sedentary Lifestyle
Obesity, described as body mass index (BMI) greater than
30 kg/sq meter, has been rapidly increasing. Prevalence of
obesity increased from 12.2% in 1991 to 20.8% in 2001.19
It increased further to 35.3% in the 2005–2006 NHANES.
There is an epidemic of obesity in the United States.
Vigorous physical exercise is needed to modify several
riskfactorsandtodecreaseriskofheartdisease.Prevalence
of physical exercise is very low in women. National Center
for Health interview survey reported in 2007 that 66.3%
women never performed vigorous physical activity and
only 9.8% engaged in vigorous physical activity, 5 days
or more per week. Objective accelerometer data from
NHANES were even more concerning with only 2.5%–3.2%
women doing 30 minutes of exercise at least 5 days per
week.20
Smoking
Smoking is a strong independent risk factor for CAD in
both men and women. Estimated prevalence of smoking
in women 18 years of age or older was 18%–23% in 2006.1
Although smoking rates in the United States are falling
overall, they are increasing in women.21
This risk is not
improved by low nicotine cigarettes and is present even
with minimal exposure.22
Women using contraceptive pills
and smoking are at particularly high risk especially after
the age of 35 years.23
Women find it harder to quit smoking
than men, probably because of the weight gain seen
with stopping smoking. Smoking can also lead to earlier
menopause, a risk factor that is unique to women.23
GUIDELINES FOR PREVENTION OF
CVD IN WOMEN
Identifying the fact that heart disease in women presents
differently, behaves differently, and requires a different
consideration for prevention is an important step. In 2004,
AHA along with several other organizations sponsored the
“Evidence Based Guidelines for Cardiovascular Disease
Prevention in Women.” Initially, the guidelines challenged
the conventional thinking that women should be treated
the same as men. Concerns were also raised about lack
of representation of women in clinical trials. Since then,
over time, more women have participated in clinical trials
and more gender-specific analysis has become available.
Considering the health implications and economic costs
associated with CVD in women, sustained efforts are
needed to apply evidence-based therapies that work.
In2007,theguidelineswereupdated.10
Anewalgorithm
for risk classification in women was adopted. This was
revised when 2011 AHA guidelines were published.24
Three
risk categories were identified—(1) at high risk, (2) at risk,
and (3) at optimal risk (ideal cardiovascular health).
Among the high risk, the rate of MI, CHD death, and
stroke was 19%, at risk 5.5%, and at optimal risk 2.2% per
10 years. A major difference from prior guidelines to 2011
updates is that instead of limiting recommendations to
evidence based (benefits observed in clinical research),
effectiveness-based (benefits and risks observed in clinical
practice) recommendations were considered.24
The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and AHA
in 2013 came up with a new tool to calculate 10 year
and lifetime risk for ASCVD.25
Along with traditional risk
factors of age, DM, hyperlipidemia and hypertension,
various other parameters like race, and sex were also
introduced into the calculations to get to this prediction
and determine the need for further work up as well
treatment. New recommendations from ACC/AHA guide
lines for lipid management came in November 2013.26
Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC8) guidelines for
HTN management came online in December 2013 and
40. 13
Chapter 2 Prevention of Heart Disease in Women
print published in 2014.27
It is expected that these will be
incorporated in the next AHA update for guidelines for
prevention of CVD in women.
Major Risk Factor Interventions
Hypertension
Treatment of HTN can go a long way in helping prevent
CVD as well as stroke. JNC8 recommendations set some-
what different targets for BP levels.27
• For patients less than 60 years of age, drug therapy
should be considered for systolic BP ≥140 mm Hg or
diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg. The goal is <140/90 mm Hg.
• For patients 60 years or older, drug therapy should be
considered for systolic BP ≥150 mm Hg or diastolic BP
≥90 mm Hg. The goal is <150/90 mm Hg.
If pharmacologic treatment for high BP results in
systolic BP <140 mm Hg and treatment is well tolerated
and without adverse effects, there is no need to adjust
therapy.
• For patients with diabetes and patients with chronic
kidney disease (CKD), the threshold to initiate drug
therapy is 140/90 mm Hg. The goal is <140/90 mm Hg.
• In nonblack patients, including those with DM initial
drug-classchoicesarethiazide-typediuretics,calcium-
channel blockers (CCBs), angiotensin-converting
enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and angiotensin-receptor
blockers (ARBs).
• In black patients, including those with DM, acceptable
initial drug-class choices are thiazide-type diuretics or
CCBs.
• Patients with CKD generally should receive ACE inhi
bitors or ARBs. This is true for all patients with CKD,
regardless of race or presence of DM.
Diabetes Mellitus
Lifestyle modifications and pharmacotherapy are recom
mended in women to achieve HbA1c <7, if this can be
achieved without significant hypoglycemia. A lot of litera
ture is available in medical and endocrine journals on this
issue. At this point, achieving HbA1c below 6 does not
seem to confer extra protection.
Hyperlipidemia
Pharmacotherapy is recommended for LDL-C lowering
in high risk women. While prior recommendations set
specific levels as targets, new 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines
usedtheintensityofstatintherapyasthegoaloftreatment.26
Four groups of individuals were identified for whom an
extensive body of evidence from randomized controlled
trials demonstrated a reduction in ASCVD events with a
good margin of safety from moderate- or high-intensity
statin therapy:
• Individuals with clinical ASCVD
• Individuals with primary elevations of LDL-C ≥190
mg/dL
• Individuals 40–75 years of age with DM and LDL-C
70–189 mg/dL without clinical
• ASCVD
• Individuals without clinical ASCVD or DM who are
40–75 years of age with LDL-C 70–189 mg/dL and have
an estimated 10-year ASCVD risk of 7.5% or higher.
High-intensity statin therapy reduces LDL-C by appro
ximately 50% and includes Atorvastatin 40–80 mg and
Rosuvastatin 20–40 mg. Moderate-intensity statin therapy
lowers LDL-C by approximately 30%–50%. Low-intensity
statin therapy lowers LDL-C on average by 30%. Although
high-intensity statin therapy reduces ASCVD events more
than moderate-intensity statin therapy, lower-intensity
statin therapy has also been shown to reduce ASCVD
events, although to a lesser degree. Therefore, individuals
that merit guideline-recommended statin therapy should
be treated with the maximum appropriate intensity of a
statin that does not cause adverse effects.
Because evidence from randomized controlled trials
shows that the absolute benefit of statin treatment is
proportional to baseline ASCVD risk, treatment decisions
for women should be based on the level of ASCVD risk.
This conclusion is a departure from previous approaches
that focused on LDL-C levels to guide treatment decisions.
Statin treatment based on estimated 10-year ASCVD
risk avoids the overtreatment of lower-risk groups such
as younger, non-Hispanic White women who, despite
moderate elevations in LDL-C, are typically not at
significantly increased risk for ASCVD in the next 10 years
in the absence of substantial risk-factor burden. However,
ignoring the increased ASCVD risk in African American
women might result in the under treatment of some
individuals who are at significantly higher ASCVD risk at
the same LDL-C level. Thus, this guideline recommends
statin therapy for individuals in whom it is most likely to
provide ASCVD risk reduction based on the estimated
10-year risk of ASCVD.
41. 14 Section 1 Prevention and Risk Factors
Non-statin therapy for hyperlipidemia, with or without
statin, may sometimes need to be considered. Use of
nia
cin, bile acid sequestrates, fibrates, omega 3 fatty acids,
and agents like Ezetimibe that inhibit cholesterol absorp
tion may be monitored as carefully as in men.
Cigarette Smoking
Smoking cessation is one of the most effective and cer
tainly the least expensive approach to disease prevention.
It does not cost anything and may in fact save money.
Women should be advised not to smoke and to avoid
second hand smoke as well. After smoking cessation, the
risk for MI quickly declined and the risk for CAD became
similar to nonsmokers at about 3 years. Despite this, not
many women who smoke are advised to quit by the health
care providers. Data from Centers for Disease Control
indicate that only close to 50% smokers who had at least
one visit to their health care provider were advised to
quit.28
It has been estimated that each year an additional
1 million smokers could be helped to quit smoking if
they got a brief counseling.29
Brief counseling should
include determining whether a patient smokes, advising
any patient who smokes to quit, assisting the patient in
quitting, for example, by setting a quit date and providing
self-help material and scheduling follow-up visits to
reinforce adherence.30,31
Providers should counsel women
at each encounter, advise behavioral program or formal
smoking cessation program, nicotine replacement, and
other pharmacotherapy.
Physical Activity
Physicalactivityandvigorousregularexerciseisamainstay
of staying healthy. Women should be advised to achieve at
least 150 min/week of moderate exercise and 75 min/week
of vigorous exercise. More benefit is obtained by increasing
moderate intensity aerobic physical activity to 5 h per
week, 2.5 h of vigorous intensity exercise, or an equivalent
combination of both.24
Women should also be advised to
do muscle strengthening exercises 2 or more days of the
week. Women who need to lose weight should be advised
to do a minimum of 60–90 min of at least moderate
intensity exercises on most and preferably all days of the
week.24
Prudent exercise programs are cost effective and
have a low potential for adverse effects.32
Exercise should
be individualized to accommodate the patient’s level of
physical fitness, cardiac status, and preferred activities.
Weight Maintenance/Loss
Women should be advised to maintain or lose weight
through a combination of lower caloric intake, physical
activity, and formal behavioral programs to achieve an
appropriate body weight (e.g. BMI <25 kg/sq meter).24
Dietary Intake
Women should consume a diet rich in fruits and vegetables
and to choose whole grain high fiber foods (Table 2). They
should be advised to eat fish, especially oily fish at least
twice a week. They should limit intake of saturated fat,
cholesterol, alcohol, salt, sugar, and avoid trans-fatty acids.
Effectiveness-based guidelines in the 2011 update
have excellent recommendations24
What Does Not Work/May Be Harmful
The effectiveness-based guidelines also came up with
recommendations on the things that do not work (Class 3
indication).24
Menopausal therapy: Hormone therapy should not be
used for primary or secondary prevention of CVD.
Antioxidant supplements: Vitamin C, E, and beta caro
tene should not be used for primary or secondary preven
tion of CVD.
Folic acid with or without B6 and B12 supplements
should not be used for primary or secondary prevention of
CVD.
Aspirin for MI in women <65 years of age: Routine use
of Aspirin is not recommended for prevention of MI in
healthy women less than 65 years of age.
A very helpful approach to primary and secondary
prevention is outlined below as recommended in 2011
update to effectiveness-based guidelines for prevention of
CVD in women (Flow chart 1).
Thus, an apple a day may not keep the doctor away but
a diet rich in fruits and vegetables and nuts is definitely
recommended to prevent heart disease in women. Anti
oxidants, despite the hype in the last few years, are not.
Aspirin, while routinely recommended in the past, is not
recommended in women younger than 65 years of age. As
the epidemic of obesity is increasing in the United States
and as CVD is increasing in some age groups in women,
a prevention strategy involving dietary intervention and
increasing physical exercise is essential to combat this
growing threat.
42. 15
Chapter 2 Prevention of Heart Disease in Women
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We appreciate the guidance and support of Dr Navin C
Nanda. We are grateful for the support provided by Aditya
Kulkarni MPH.
REFERENCES
1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M et al. Heart dis-
ease and stroke statistics—2009 update: A report from
the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and
Stroke-Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2009;119:w21.
2. Mosca L, Grundy SM, Judelson D, et al. Guide to preventive
cardiology for women: AHA/ACC Scientific Statement
Consensus panel statement. Circulation. 1999;99:2480.
Table 2: Dietary intake recommendations for women
Nutrient Serving Serving size
Fruits and
Vegetables
>4.5 cups /day 1 cup raw leafy vegetables,
½ cup cut-up raw or cooked
vegetables, ½ cup vegetable
juice, 1 medium fruit,
¼ cup dried fruit, ½ cup
fresh frozen or canned fruit,
½ cup fruit juice
Fish 2/wk 3.5 oz, cooked (preferably
oily types of fish
Fiber 30g/d(1.1g/10g
carbohydrate)
Bran cereal, berries,
avocado, and so on
Whole grains 3/day 1 slice bread, 1 oz dry cereal,
1/2 cup cooked rice, pasta,
or cereal (all whole-grain
products)
Sugar <5/wk (450
kcal/wk
from sugar-
sweetened
beverages
1 tablespoon sugar, 1 table-
spoon jelly or jam, 1/2 cup
sorbet, 1 cup lemonade
Nuts, Leg-
umes, Seeds
>4/wk 1/3 cup or 1 1/2 oz nuts
(avoid macadamia nuts and
salted nuts), 2 tablespoons
peanut butter, 2 tablespoon
or 1/2 oz seeds, 1/2 cup
cooked legumes (dry beans
and peas)
Saturated fat <7% total
energy intake
Found in fried foods, fat on
meat or chicken skin,
packaged desserts, butter,
cheese, sour cream, and so on
Cholesterol <150 mg/day Found in animal meats,
organ meats, eggs, and so on
Alcohol One drink or
less
4 oz wine, 12 oz beer, 1.5 oz
of 80 proof sprits or 1 oz of
100 proof sprits
Sodium <1500 mg
Trans-fatty
acids
0
Mosca L et al. Circulation, 2011; 123:1243-1262.
Flow chart 1: Prevention of CAD in women24
43. 16 Section 1 Prevention and Risk Factors
3. Ford ES, Ajani UA, Croft JB, et al. Explaining the decrease
in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980–2000. N Engl J
Med. 2007;356:2388-98.
4. Mosca L, Mochari-Greenberger H, Dolor RJ, et al. Twelve-
year follow-up of American women’s awareness of cardio
vascular disease risk and barriers to heart health. Circ
Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3:120-7.
5. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, et al. Effect of potentially
modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarc
tion in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Case Control
Study. Lancet. 2004;364:937.
6. Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, et al. Randomized trial of
estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coro
nary heart disease in postmenopausal women. JAMA. 1998;
280:605.
7. Grady D, Herrington D, Brenner V, et al. Cardiovascular
disease outcomes during 6.8 years of hormone therapy:
Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study follow-up
(HERS II). JAMA. 2002;288:49.
8. Manson JE, Hsia J, Johnson KC, et al. Estrogen plus
progestin and the risk of coronary heart disease. N Engl J
Med. 2003;349:523.
9. Women’s Health Initiative Steering Committee. Effects of
conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal women
with hysterectomy: The Women’s Health initiative rando
mized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291:1701.
10. Mosca L, Banka CL, Benjamin EJ, et al. Evidence-based
guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women:
2007 Update. Circulation. 2007;115:1481.
11. Yamanda Y, Izawa H, Ichihara s, et al. Prediction of the risk
of myocardial infarction from polymorphisms in candidate
genes. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1916.
12. Newby LK, Douglas PS. Cardiovascular Disease in Women,
Braunwald’s Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular
Medicine, 9th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders;
2012. p. 1757.
13. Fields LE, Burt VL, Cutler JA, et al. The burden of adult
hypertension in the United States 199 to 200: A rising tide.
Hypertension. 2004;44:398.
14. Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance
of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: A meta-
analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61
prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360:1903
15. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and
stroke statistics—2011 update: a report from the American
Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:e18.
16. Hajjar, I, Kotchen TA. Trends in prevalence, awareness,
treatment and control of hypertension in the United States,
1988–2000. JAMA. 2003;290:199.
17. Wang XL, Tam C, McCredie RM, et al. Determinants of
severity of coronary artery disease in Australian men and
women. Circulation. 1994;89:1974.
18. Spelsberg A, Ridker PM, Manson JE. Carbohydrate meta
bolism, obesity and diabetes. In: Douglas PS (Ed). Cardio
vascular Health and Disease in Women. Philadelphia: WB
Saunders Company; 1993. p. 191
19. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman, BA, et al. Prevalence of
obesity, diabetes and obesity related health risk factors,
2001. JAMA. 2003;289:76.
20. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, et al. Physical activity
in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci
Sports Exerc. 2008;40:181.
21. Fried LP, Becker DM. Smoking and cardiovascular disease.
In: Douglas PS (Ed). Cardiovascular Health and Disease
in Women. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1993.
p. 217.
22. Colditz GA, Bonita R, Stampfer MJ, et al. Cigarette smoking
and risk of stroke in middle aged women. N Engl J Med.
1988;318:937.
23. Shapiro S, Sloane D, Rosenberg L, et al. Oral contracep
tive use in relation to myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1979;
1:743
24. Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, et al. Effectiveness-based
guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease
in women—2011 update, a guideline from the American
Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:1243.
25. Goff DC Jr, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, et al. 2013 ACC/
AHA guide
line on the assessment of cardiovascular risk:
a report of the American College of Cardiology/American
Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am
Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 Pt B):2935-59.
26. Stone NJ, Robinson J, Lichtenstein AH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA
guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce
athero
sclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of
the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Asso
ciation Task Force on Practice Guideline. J Am Coll Cardiol.
2014;63(25 Pt B):2889-934.
27. James PA, Oparil S, Carter B, et al. 2014 Evidence-based
guideline for the management of high blood pressure in
adults. Report from the panel members appointed to the
Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC8). JAMA. 2014;
311(5):507.
28. Physician and other health-care professional counselling
of smokers to quit—United States, 1991. MMWR. 1993;
42:854.
29. Public Health service: Healthy People 2000: National health
Promotion and disease prevention objectives—full report,
with commentary. (DHHS publication no PHS 91-50212.
Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human
Services. Public Health Service, 1991.
30. Glynn TJ, Manley MW. How to help your patients stop
smoking: A national cancer Institute manual for physicians.
(DHHS publication no. PHS 92- 3064. Bethesda, MD: US.
Department of Health and Human Services, National
institute of Health, National cancer Institute 1992.
31. Farmer JA, Gotto AM. Dyslipidemia and Other Risk Factors
for Coronary Artery Disease. Braunwald’s Heart Disease.
Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; 1997.
32. Levine GN, Balady GJ. The benefits and risks of exercise
training: The exercise prescription. Adv Intern Med. 1993;
38:57.
44. Sanne AE Peters, Yvonne T van der Schouw, Mark Woodward, Rachel R Huxley
Sex Differences in the Effects
of Leading and Most Prevalent
Modifiable Risk Factors
3
C H A P T E R
Despite substantial progress in the awareness, treatment
and prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) over the
past decades, CVD remains the world’s leading, and argu-
ably the most preventable, cause of death and disability.1
Moreover, despite considerable efforts to raise awareness
of CVD and its symptoms, there is still a widespread per-
ception, particularly in lower and middle-income coun-
tries, that CVD is a disease that predominantly affects
men.2
However, as women have a greater life expectancy
than men, the cardiovascular burden in absolute terms,
is actually greater in women than in men; in 2004, almost
32% of all deaths in women were due to cardiovascu-
lar causes compared with 27% in men.3
These estimates,
and the notable sex difference in cardiovascular burden,
are likely to increase further due to population aging,
a higher life expectancy and the decade delay in the
development of symptomatic CVD in women relative to
men.4-7
Sex differences can be identified throughout the entire
life course of CVD. Compared with men, women are
less likely to receive pharmacological treatment for the
management of cardiovascular risk factors;8,9
coronary
ischemic attacks present differently in men and women,
such that women are more likely to delay seeking medical
attention than men;10-12
women are less likely to be referred
for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures;13
and the
prognosis for women with CVD is usually worse than it is
for men.14-16
Moreover, despite the significant anatomical,
physiological and behavioral differences between men
and women, it is commonly assumed in medicine that the
effects of risk factors on disease outcomes are the same in
women as in men. This assumption largely stemmed from
the historical fact that (with the rare exception) most of
the early cohort studies and randomized trials that were
initiated in the mid-20th century were comprised solely
of men.17-20
However, since the initiation in the 1980s and
more recently, of large prospective cohorts comprising
both men and women,21,22
or solely women,23-26
we are now
in a position to better test the hypothesis of an equivalency
of risk factor effects on cardiovascular and other outcomes
between the sexes.
Determining reliably, whether there are clinically
meaningful sex differences in risk factor–disease asso
ciations is important, not solely to better understand the
etiology of CVD, but also from a population and public
health vantage. Convincing evidence of whether sex
differences exist in the effect of the most prevalent and
modifiable risk factors, including elevated blood pressure,
cigarette smoking, diabetes mellitus, excess weight and
raised cholesterol, is necessary since these risk factors are
among the leading causes of CVD.3
Current estimates of
the burden of CVD, which are used to inform public health
policy, assume that these risk factors effect cardiovascular
risk similarly in women as in men.1,3
However, if this
assumption is proven to be invalid, then it would neces
sitate the revision of the estimates to more accurately
reflect the true nature of the relationships in women
and men. Moreover, just as possible racial differences
in the relationships between risk factors and diseases
are considered when tailoring specific interventions for
different communities, so could information on important
sex differences be used to provide an added impetus
for targeted interventions aimed at the treatment and
management of these risk factors in both sexes.
The objectives of the present review are two-fold.
First, we aim to provide an overview of the most current
evidence on sex differences in the prevalence of major CVD
risk factors. Second, we examine the evidence pertaining