The order of the district court On 02/19/2019, the District Court of Karlsruhe decided to discontinue the proceedings. No care was ordered. Alas, I was deceived from the beginning by several persons including the lawyer Dr. David Schneider-Addae-Mensah.

1. Copy
File number:
1 XVII 1148/18
District Court of Karlsruhe
CARE COURT
Order
Care for
Andreas Marcus Pfefferle, born on 10/23/1965, Im Eichbäumle 18, 76139 Karlsruhe
- Concerned person -
Representative:
LawyerDr.DavidSchneider-Addae-Mensah, Kantstraße4,76137 Karlsruhe,Gz.:72/18
The District Court of Karlsruhe decided by the judge at the district court Dr. Kitanoff on
02/19/2019:
The proceedings for an order to supervise are discontinued.
Care is not decreed.
Reasons:
The investigations have shown that the decree of care according to §§ 1896 and et seq.
German Civil Code (BGB) is not necessary and the person concerned refuses care.
This results in particular from the report of the care authority of the City Karlsruhe of
02/18/2019 and the statement of the authorized representative of the person concerned of
01/16/2019.
The mere fact that the person concerned is able to instruct a lawyer to represent his

2. - Page 2 -
1 XVII 1148/18
interests within the context of a care procedure clearly shows that there is currently no need
for care.
Care is therefore not necessary and also not proportionate.
Instructions on legal remedies:
Complaints may be lodged against this decision.
The appeal must be filed within a period of 1 month with the
District Court of Karlsruhe
Schlossplatz 23
76131 Karlsruhe
If the person concerned is domiciled, he may also lodge the complaint with the district court in whose
district he is domiciled.
The period begins with the written announcement of the decision. If the written notification is made by
notification in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, the date of notification
shall be decisive. If the written notification is made by posting and if the notification is to be effected in
Germany, the document shall be deemed to have been made known 3 days after posting unless the
party concerned provides prima facie evidence that he did not receive the document or received it
only at a later date. If written notification to a party cannot be effected, the period shall commence no
later than 5 months after the adoption of the decision. If the deadline falls on a Sunday, a public
holiday or Saturday, the deadline shall end at the end of the next working day.
The appeal shall be lodged by filing a notice of appeal or by writing to the Office. The appeal may be
declared to be recorded by another local court; however, the time limit for lodging an appeal shall be
observed only if the record is received in due time by the court before which the appeal is to be
lodged. The notice of appeal or the minutes shall be signed by the appellant or his authorized
representative.
The appeal shall contain the name of the contested decision and a statement that an appeal will be
lodged against that decision.
The appeal shall state the grounds on which it is based.
Appeals may also be filed as electronic documents. An appeal by e-mail is not admissible. How to file
an appeal electronically with a court is described at www,ejustice-bw.de.
Dr. Kitanoff
Judge at district court

3. - Page 3 -
1 XVII 1148/18
Adoption of the resolution (§ 38 ¶ 3 sentence 3 FamFG):
Handover to the office on
02/19/2019.
Raunser, clerk of the court
Registrar of the office
Issued
Karlsruhe, 02/19/2019
Raunser
Registrar of the office