When there is a contradiction between beliefs and actions questioning method and intent.

1. Behold the Pale Horse
Apostles of Deceit
Theology is generally considered to be information regarding God and religion. Theology is accredited as
a divine doctrine from a transcendental God-being directing the stipulations of our behavior for earthly
blessings and a heavenly reward in the afterlife. The human aspect of following these instructions and
implementing them is where the discrepancy of honoring them ruptures. So only by our words do we
have an abundance of believers while our deeds reveal no scarcity of deceivers. Therefore, is it a
problem of doctrine or deceit? Theological guidance or depraved behavior are demonstrated by the
cloak of our actions.
The vast majority of people have a religious compass of belief governing their behavior. However, the
veneer of religious affiliation often mask the consciousness it takes to feel like decent folk despite
commissions to the contrary. At what point does a believer’s actions expose them as a situational
believer incapable of restraint when tested? The profusion of religious righteousness escalates the
arrogance of entitlement based on assimilation and proximity of common belief, circumstances, or
objectives. The resulting tug of war absorbs those betrothed to capitulation by a hierarchy of
condemnation whose humanity is judged summarily as less valuable by religious belief or culture.
Although the cattle brand of religious ideology is responsible for many wonderful things it also has
instigated some of the most heinous acts ever committed. Conquest has always been the destructive
gene of humanity, but ideological conquest is a mirage whose invasion is of a thought or belief. Thoughts
cannot be exterminated by invasion, only the people holding them can. Thoughts must be persuaded
just as beliefs are convinced. Conciliatory actions are the persuasion which convinces opinions fostering
a truce of ideological hostilities. Accordingly, complementary actions must be sought instead of rhetoric
of divisiveness prolonging conflicts whose resolution will not be by force or vengeance.
While force can be met with force, it must also be met with reason. Whereas vengeance belongs to the
offended, similar to punishment and force it must not be measured by rage but by violation. The
punishment must correspond to the offense for the reaction to be considered appropriate. Frustration,
nationalism, or geo-politically influenced actions rarely exterminate ideologies, religious beliefs, or
resentment. Still, the drawing of first blood incites blinders of justification validating retaliation, but not
unrelenting vengeance exceeding the callousness of the provocation that initiated the retaliation.
Nevertheless, to abandon the core beliefs of one’s assertions betrayed by one’s actions invalidates either
the core belief or the action. It is our ideological identity that binds us beyond geographical boundaries
accept when geographically challenged. Then aggression, vengeance, or conquest overwhelms our
humanity, beliefs, and convictions suspending the means justified to ruthlessly secure the ends. From
biblical, ancestral, to historical conflicts an eye for an eye is a uniform equivalent as the reasonable
consequences and complications for acts of transgression.
This medieval inhumanity takes up the pale horse weapons of the sword, famine, pestilence by violence,
and animalistic thirst of human sacrifices to appease a justification of belief, outrage, or seizure by force,
suffocation, or exploitation. So we are indeed constantly living in the last days of the apocalypse due to a
penchant for power, control, and violence. Our masquerades of beliefs, morality, and echelons of
humanity disrupts every ecosystem on earth and now even threatens beyond our stratosphere. So

2. behold the pale horse of believers medieval weapons in hand accompanied by a twisted Ideological
famine employing a philosophy of genocidal conquest and vengeance bolstered by the righteousness of
subjectivity.
The Pale Horse of the apocalypse rode by death and followed by hades devouring humanity corrupts the
north star guided by ideologies imbedded psychologically and sociologically. Religious and cultural
differences are often the witches brew stirring atrocities shrouded by subjective validation. Therefore,
contradictory actions makes beliefs questionable but deeds clear. The harmonic principles of stimulating
war, starvation, or inhumanity while highbrow posturing reveals the sinister intent of the outcome and
the wayward deeds to achieve it.
A sentiment galvanized and mass produced triggers a manipulated hysteria disengaging the method from
the objective often leading to unconscionable subjugations of humanity. Those aligned with the
perpetrators of such inhumanity also bear the burden and sins for their complicity in their commission.
According to Leviticus 5:1 silence toward evil is accountable for those who remain silent. So the sin is
equally attributed to the action and the silence that witness it. We are often motivated by our cultural
affiliations, economics, or xenophobia to minimize our actions along with those who we hold allegiance.
Given the historical context of tenets of beliefs, especially the reigning doctrines, surely an ethical
acknowledgement should extend to reciprocate the same humanity we expect for ourselves. The nucleus
of an understanding is a concession to a settlement. Submitted by untenable circumstances,
suppression, or decimation beyond contention orchestrating terms of survival leaves no room for
options or concessions. However, it does amplifies the ideology sought to be exterminated beyond the
margins inviting pervasive condemnation and contempt.
The benefit of victory at the expense of the soul has been the traditional apocalyptic exchange
pulverizing the mind and spirit to exercise dominance and intent. The P.R. campaign of history continues
to unravel escalating conflicts instead of reevaluating the procession to clash and assigning name to
deed. So, for the sake of brevity pardon me for my indirect appropriation. In terms of ideology and not
identity, every belief system has its origin, journey, and circulation unique unto itself. Each distinctive
expression represents the bylaws, if you will, representative of that belief or ideology.
Many of the reigning doctrines navigate the globe beyond language, culture, class, or geography making
its ideological replication a thought amplified in theory and practice. As such, it is as fluid as it is
pervasive beyond extermination. The aforementioned belief systems have survived many attempts to
purge them for this reason, the robust rituals of religious and sociological integration. This ancestral
uniformity of automated perceptions harkens of their ancient necessity and limitations but these
ideological antiques of elapsed ignorance must be abandoned for future trajectory.
The resolution for the future is not in centuries and millennium old grievances, fallacies, or denials of
their occurrence or repercussions. Integrity and candor identifies the solutions estimated by the
adaptation to achieve its purpose. As many beliefs and celebrations or observances converge upon us
this holy season, contemplate what yours are by doctrine similar to others. The semantics of each basis
yields parallel principles of behavior regarding peace, love, and exemplary character. So, seemingly there
is no discord by doctrine on preferred code of conduct or bylaw behavioral comparisons despite worship.

3. However, the renunciation and aspersions emerge from the contradictory conduct overriding the lofty
directives and portrayals diametrically opposing the assertions of belief, intent, and character or prestige
biblical, historical, or otherwise. The voyeuristic trance of the past is a fetish of regressed infantile
development entombed by the expired limitations of knowledge and belief remaining confined to its
expression and stagnation. In other words, having outgrown the play box and frivolous fascinations eager
for exploration and expansion but restrained by nurture and circumstances. It is the essence and nature
of survival, of life to seek development.
So, primitive perspectives adhering to a history repelling transformation consents to the tunnel vision of
past discord. Self-preservation will always gravitate towards survival but so will errant beliefs and
ideologies morphing their definition and intent to ensnare a host or parasitic devotion. These are those
known by their words but exposed by their deeds. These are the trojan horses concealing the pale horse
of destruction double crossing believers by hijacking the sincerity of a belief to hide among them. By
their blasphemous contradictions of inhumanity, deceit, and destruction they corrupt the sanctity of the
belief.
The plight of further generations entrusted to rectify the colosseum remnants of our stagnation,
inhumanity, and ignorance will be to discontinue a legacy reduced to a rigid past rejecting a radiant
future. Many worn out concepts, practices, and justifications prevent the invigorating possibilities of our
transcendental progressions. The yellow brick road is a journey onward toward the conviction of our
actions, words, and belief to be obvious in the unity of our conduct and humanity. The blueprint is
known but the execution is still by guillotine instead of accomplishment.
The deed identifies the doer and dogma or doctrine. Our sin is not of sight but of silence cajoling the
apostles of deceit to discredit us by association to their betrayal of our belief and humanity. Consensus is
not always popular and many times is silent until outrage is popular. So, who is being deceived, us, them,
belief, or actions? Whichever, should not be determined by the sin of our silence or the silencing of our
sin but the universal tenets of our shared beliefs.