File available for download at https://journalistethics.com/ This dossier provides an online point of reference for all known official court documents that relate to legal challenges against Electoral College results from America’s 2020 Federal Election. Web links point to reputable official databases such as a court .gov website or a recognized law authority such as Justia. All documents obtained from non.gov sources have been cross referenced for accuracy. Some privately issued official court documents are not yet available via .gov sites. Reduction in staffing for the festive season Shutdown and COVID19 may explain this. This directory has three main parts. Part A lists cases that were filed prior to the Federal Election on November 3, 2020. Part B lists cases that were filed after the Federal Election on November 3, 2020. Both sections list these cases by state jurisdiction, in A-to-Z alphabetical order. Part C annexes a page of the website titled ‘Democracy Docket’. This directory lists cases that relate to Federal Election challenges that predate 2019. Most of these cases are not listed in Parts A or B. This booklet guides readers to consult official documents at the source to freely draw informed conclusions. Corrupt, phony entities such as Wikipedia and mainstream corporate fake news such as CNN and The New York Times are biased. They selectively cite and omit developments. This dossier is correct as of December 29, 2020. Any omissions or errors are honest oversights. Key words : Sidney Powell, Donald Trump, Rudolph Giuliani, Democrats, Republican, US Supreme Court, Dominion, Voting Machines, foreign interference, ballots, covid 19, covid-19, coronavirus, supreme court

1. USA Election 2020
Electoral Litigation
Directory of Cases
Part 1
Dec 29, 2020

2. www.journalistethics.com 1 Public Consultation Draft
Summary p. 2
Outstanding lawsuits:
Political Parties as Plaintiffs, Co-plaintiffs, Defendants or Co-defendants p. 3
Part A Pre-election lawsuits p. 4
Overview p. 5
Arizona, California, District of Columbia p. 6
Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada p. 7
New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania p. 9
Tennessee, Texas p. 11
Washington State p. 12
Part B Post-election lawsuits p. 13
Arizona p. 14
Georgia p. 18
Michigan p. 20
Nevada p. 22
New Mexico p. 23
Texas p. 24
Wisconsin p. 25
Part C Democracy Docket – 50 states plus DC p. 27
Forthcoming p. 28

3. www.journalistethics.com 2 Public Consultation Draft
Summary
This dossier provides an online point of reference for all known official court documents that
relate to legal challenges against Electoral College results from America’s 2020 Federal Election.
Web links point to reputable official databases such as a court .gov website or a recognized law
authority such as Justia. All documents obtained from non.gov sources have been cross-
referenced for accuracy. Some privately issued official court documents are not yet available via
.gov sites. Reduction in staffing for the festive season shutdown and COVID19 may explain this.
This directory has three main parts. Part A lists cases that were filed prior to the Federal Election
on November 3, 2020. Part B lists cases that were filed after the Federal Election on November
3, 2020. Both sections list these cases by state jurisdiction, in A-to-Z alphabetical order. Part C
annexes a page of the website titled ‘Democracy Docket’. This directory lists cases that relate to
Federal Election challenges that predate 2019. Most of these cases are not listed in Parts A or B.
This booklet guides readers to consult official documents at the source to freely draw informed
conclusions. Corrupt, phony entities such as Wikipedia and mainstream corporate fake news such
as CNN and The New York Times are biased. They selectively cite and omit developments.
This dossier is correct as of December 29, 2020. Any omissions or errors are honest oversights.

4. www.journalistethics.com 3 Public Consultation Draft
Outstanding lawsuits:
Political Parties as Plaintiffs, Co-plaintiffs, Defendants or Co-defendants
1. Bognet et al. v. Boockvar (see page 9)
2. Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar (see page 5)
3. Scarnati v. Pennsylvania Democratic Party (see page 5)
4. Bowyer v. Ducey (see page 14)
5. Pearson et al. v. Kemp et al. (see page 18)
6. King v. Whitmer (see page 20)
7. Feehan v. Wisconsin Elections Commission (see page 25)

5. www.journalistethics.com 4 Public Consultation Draft
Part A
Pre-election lawsuits

6. www.journalistethics.com 5 Public Consultation Draft
Overview
Lawsuits relating to the voting process were filed in at least eleven states prior to America’s
Federal Election which occurred on November 3, 2020. Most of these lawsuits relate to measures
taken by state legislatures and electoral officials in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The order of this section is by ‘state’ jurisdiction in A-to-Z. These 12 states are: Arizona, California,
District of Columbia (i.e., a District not a state), Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New
York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, and Washington State.
Two cases remain ongoing on December 29, 2020. These are Case Nos. 20-542 and 20-574.
Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar – Appealed to the US Supreme Court.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-542.html
Scarnati v. Pennsylvania Democratic Party – Appealed to the US Supreme Court.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-574.html

7. www.journalistethics.com 6 Public Consultation Draft
Arizona
Arizona Democratic Party v. Hobbs
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Status: Ruled – October 6, 2020
www.ca9.uscourts.gov/content/view.php?pk_id=0000001053
Mi Familia Vota v. Hobbs
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Status: Ruled – October 5, 2020
www.ca9.uscourts.gov/content/view.php?pk_id=0000001054
California
Gallagher v. Newsom
Court: California Superior Court, County of Sutter
Status: Ruled – November 2, 2020
www.suttercourts.com/sites/default/files/press_releases/Gallagher%20and%20Kiley%20v.%20
Newsom.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3IFtoCj0OMacgoZu8QcxnnqUi1fGa1__9DjOXG9TC_IjAk42D1Mcs_17E
District of Columbia
Michigan Welfare Rights Organization et al. v. Donald J. Trump
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Status: Ongoing
https://dockets.justia.com/docket/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2020cv03388/224322

8. www.journalistethics.com 7 Public Consultation Draft
Wisconsin Voters Alliance v. Pence
Court: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Status: Withdrawn
https://dockets.justia.com/docket/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2020cv03791/225330
Michigan
Michigan Alliance for Retired Americans v. Benson
Court: Michigan Court of Appeals
Status: Ruled – November 23, 2020
https://dockets.justia.com/docket/michigan/miwdce/1:2020cv00948/99148
Minnesota
Carson v. Simon
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
Status: Deadline extension suspended by 8th Circuit
https://oag.ca.gov/sites/default/files/Carson-v-Simon-Amicus.pdf
Nevada
Kraus v. Cegavske
Court: Nevada Supreme Court
Status: Dismissed – November 10, 2020
* Trump campaign is also listed as a plaintiff
http://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/public/caseView.do?csIID=60237&combined=true

9. www.journalistethics.com 8 Public Consultation Draft
The Election Integrity Project of Nevada v. The State of Nevada
Court: Eighth Judicial District Court in and for Clark County, State of Nevada
Status: Dismissed – December 11, 2020
Complaint: www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/09/200910-
Motion-to-Intervene-on-OST.pdf
Decision:
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/09/document.pdf
Corona v. Cegavske
Court: First Judicial District Court in and for Carson City, State of Nevada
Status: Voluntary Dismissal
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/07/Complaint.pdf
Trump v. Gloria
Court: District Court Clark County Nevada
Status: Voluntary dismissal – November 9, 2020
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/NOE-DJT-2.pdf
Paher v. Cegavske
Court: United States District Court of Nevada
Status: Dismissed – July 31, 2020
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/07/Order-1.pdf
Silberkraus v. Woodhouse
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Status: April 19, 2019
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/07/Nevada-Recall-Effort-
Nevada-Supreme-Court-Decision.pdf

10. www.journalistethics.com 9 Public Consultation Draft
New Jersey
Donald J. Trump for President v. Way
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
Status: Dismissed – Filing date October 22, 2020
www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-njd-3_20-cv-10753
New York
Trump v. New York (20-366) (Per Curiam)
Court: United States Supreme Court
Status: Dismissed – December 18, 2020
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-366_7647.pdf
Pennsylvania
The first two cases listed in this subsection remain active on December 29, 2020. The third listed
case, Mike Kelly et al. is an inactive (dismissed) case.
Complaint: Bognet v. Boockvar
Filed in Pennsylvania on November 9, 2020
Decision, United States Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit
http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/203214p.pdf
Docket: Supreme Court Appeal, Petition date November 20, 2020, Case No. 20-740
Status: Active
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-740/161431/20201120145219303_2020-11-
20%20Bognet%20Cert%20Petition.pdf
www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public%5C20-
740.html

11. www.journalistethics.com 10 Public Consultation Draft
Complaint: Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar
Filed with the United States Supreme Court on December 20, 2020
Case Nos. 20-542 and 20-574
Status: Active
https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/trump-v-boockvar-motion.pdf
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Donald-J.-Trump-for-President-v-
Boockvar-3rd-Cir-Doc42-1.pdf
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-542/159651/20201104151441413_20-542%2020-
574%20PA%20Mot%20to%20Intervene.pdf
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-542_i3dj.pdf
MIKE KELLY, U.S. Congressman; SEAN PARNELL; THOMAS A. FRANK; NANCY KIERZEK; DEREK
MAGEE; ROBIN SAUTER; MICHAEL KINCAID; and WANDA LOGAN, Applicants v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY; THOMAS W.
WOLF, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and KATHY
BOOCKVAR, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
Respondents.
Court: United States Supreme Court
Status: Dismissed
US Supreme Court Case No. 20A98; Linked with case No. 20-810
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20A98/162968/20201208090425848_20A98%20Respo
nse%20in%20Opposition%20efile.pdf
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20A98/162962/20201208084935306_20A98acDemocr
aticCaucusOfPennsylvaniaSenate.pdf
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20A98/162573/20201203162739451_Final_Emergency
%20Application%20for%20Writ%20of%20Injunction.pdf
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20A98/162823/20201207125434553_Cert%20of%20co
mpliance.pdf
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20A98/162823/20201207125419788_2020-12-
7%20Amici%20-%20combined.pdf

12. www.journalistethics.com 11 Public Consultation Draft
Tennessee
Memphis A. Philip Randolph Institute et al. v. Hargett et al.
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee; U.S. Court of Appeals 6th Circuit
Status: Dismissed – October 15, 2020
www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ca6-20-06046
Texas
Harris County Drive Through Voting Suits
Court: Texas Supreme Court et al.
Status: Dismissed – November 2, 2020
Multiple cases – for example see the ruling of Judge Hanen
www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/judge-rejects-gop-effort-to-throw-out-127000-houston-votes
This case does not appear to be reported in the public domain by the court.
Hotze v. Hollins
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit
Status: Dismissed – Order dated November 3, 2020
http://www.search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=08021d83-2702-442c-
9753-cb1d1ea39b57&coa=cossup&DT=BRIEFS&MediaID=b3627ee2-3263-464a-b40b-
e5bb0907f7fb
Re: Steven Hotze, Harris County Republican Party, Hon. Keith Nielsen, and Sharon Hemphill
Court: Texas Supreme Court
Status: Dismissed – October 7, 2020
www.txcourts.gov/supreme/orders-opinions/2020/october/october-7-2020/

13. www.journalistethics.com 12 Public Consultation Draft
Re: Steven Hotze, M.D., Wendell Champion, Hon. Steven Toth, and Sharon Hemphill
Court: Texas Supreme Court
Status: Dismissed – November 1, 2020
www.txcourts.gov/supreme/orders-opinions/2020/november/november-1-2020/
Texas Democratic Party v. Abbott
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
Status: Ruled – June 26, 2020
www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/19a1055.html
Texas League of United Latin American Citizens v. Abbott
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit
Status: Ruled – October 12, 2020
www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/20/20-50867-CV0.pdf
Washington State
Washington Vs. Trump et al.
Court: District Court, E.D. Washington
Status: Ruled – September 17, 2020
www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-waed-1_20-cv-03127
www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-waed-1_20-cv-03127/context

14. www.journalistethics.com 13 Public Consultation Draft
Part B
Pre-election lawsuits

15. www.journalistethics.com 14 Public Consultation Draft
Arizona
Bowyer versus Ducey is a lawsuit launched by Sidney Powell.
Status: This case remains on appeal to United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
www.courtlistener.com/docket/18707812/bowyer-v-ducey/
This link above lists dozens of documents that relate to this in progress appeal.
The Arizona District Court presided over the initial case. Documents related to this case, below,
were sourced from: https://electioncases.osu.edu/case/bowyer-v-ducey/
Complaint (12/2/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc1.pdf
Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (12/2/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc2.pdf

16. www.journalistethics.com 15 Public Consultation Draft
Order Reassigning Case to Different Judge (12/2/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc7.pdf
Plaintiffs’ Notice of Errata in Motion for TRO and PI (12/2/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc8.pdf
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Seal Document (12/2/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc14.pdf
Motion to Intervene by Arizona Democratic Party (12/3/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc26.pdf
Motion to Intervene by Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (12/3/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc27.pdf
Plaintiffs’ Opposition to AZ Democratic Party's Motion to Intervene (12/3/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc29.pdf
Arizona Democratic Party's Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to AZ Dem Party's Motion to
Intervene (12/4/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc31.pdf
Defendants’ Request for Pre-Hearing Order (12/4/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc33.pdf
Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Request for Pre-Hearing Order (12/4/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc34.pdf

17. www.journalistethics.com 16 Public Consultation Draft
Order regarding witnesses and exhibits (12/4/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc35.pdf
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors’ Motion to Dismiss and Response in Opposition to
Plaintiffs’ Motion for TRO and PI (12/4/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc36.pdf
Arizona Democratic Party’s Motion to Dismiss and Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for TRO and PI
(12/4/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc37.pdf
Defendant Ducey’s Motion to Dismiss and Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for TRO and PI
(12/4/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc38.pdf
Defendant Hobbs’ Motion to Dismiss and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for TRO and PI
(12/4/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc40.pdf
Defendant Hobbs’ Notice of Supplemental Authority (12/5/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc41.pdf
Plaintiffs’ Reply to Responses in Opposition to Motion for Injunctive Relief (12/5/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc44.pdf
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike AZ Democratic Party's Motion to Dismiss and Response to Plaintiffs'
Motion for TRO and PI (12/5/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc45.pdf

18. www.journalistethics.com 17 Public Consultation Draft
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Modification of Hearing Schedule (12/5/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc46.pdf
Arizona Democratic Party’s Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Opposition to Motion to
Strike (12/6/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc52.pdf
Reply in Support of Gov Ducey’s Motion to Dismiss (12/6/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc53.pdf
Maricopa County Intervenors’ Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss (12/6/20)
https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc54.pdf
Defendant Sec of State Hobbs’ Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss (12/6/20)
Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc55.pdf (osu.edu)
Order Granting Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (12/9/20)
Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc84.pdf (osu.edu)
Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal (12/10/20)
Bowyer-v-Ducey-Doc85.pdf (osu.edu)

19. www.journalistethics.com 18 Public Consultation Draft
Georgia
Status: One case remains on appeal to the United States Supreme Court.
This is Pearson et al. Versus Kemp et al. The Wood case was dismissed on December 28, 2020.
Wood Versus Raffensberger, US District Court Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-
courts/georgia/gandce/1:2020cv04651/283580/54/
Wood Versus Raffensberger, US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202014418.pdf
Complaint Wood Versus Raffensberger, Supreme Court
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-
799/163004/20201208115323647_201205a%20Petition%20for%20efiling.pdf
US Supreme Court Order – December 28, 2020
https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Order-Denying-
TRO-and-Dismissing-Case-Wood-III.pdf
Complaint: Pearson et al. Versus Kemp et al.
https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-
KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf
Dismissed cases
Complaint: Boland v. Raffensperger,
Superior Court of Fulton County State of Georgia
https://election.conservative.org/files/2020/12/2020-11-30-Verified-Complaint-2.pdf
Ruling
https://election.conservative.org/files/2020/12/2020.12.8-Final-Order-Granting-MTDs-
2020CV343018-Boland-v.-Raffensperger-et-al.-KH623927x9D7F4.pdf

20. www.journalistethics.com 19 Public Consultation Draft
Complaint: Trump v. Raffensperger
https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/verified-petition-to-contest-georgia-
election.pdf
Emergency motion: Trump v. Raffensperger
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/2020.12.08-As-Filed-
Emergency-Motion-to-Intervene-with-Exhibits-KH623787x9D7F4.pdf
Emergency injunction
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/2020CV343255-MOTION-
to-Add-Electors-and-for-Interlocutory-Relief-KH623682x9D7F4-1.pdf
Oral argument
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/2020.12.09-Petitioners-
Objections-to-Intervenors-Motion-for-Oral-Argument-KH624112x9D7F4.pdf
Oral argument
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Intervenors-Emergency-
Motion-for-Dec.-8-Hearing-KH623743x9D7F4.pdf
Notice of appeal
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Trump-v-Raffensperger-
Notice-of-Appeal-SCoGA-12-14-20.pdf
Supreme Court Emergency Petition
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/2020-12-11-S21M0561-
Emergency-Petition-For-Writ-of-Certioraripdf.pdf
Supreme Court or Georgia Ruling
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/D97B3026-6647-46A7-
B909-B137A938BC43-converted.pdf

21. www.journalistethics.com 20 Public Consultation Draft
Michigan
Active cases: King Versus Whitmer (Case No. 20-815)
Original petition, US District Court Eastern District of Michigan
https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf
Petition lodged with the US Supreme Court of the United States for writ of certorari.
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-
815/164238/20201218233109254_King_v._Whitmer_Bank_Amicus_Brief.pdf
Several dozen documents about this active case are available at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/18693929/king-v-whitmer/
Others are available direct from .gov website searches, such as these petition examples:
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-
815/164119/20201218094817656_SCOTUS.FINAL..GA.MI.Motion%20for%20Expedited%20Con
sideration.pdf

22. www.journalistethics.com 21 Public Consultation Draft
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-
815/163621/20201211163936285_Petition%20Michigan%20.pdf
Dismissed/dropped cases
Complaint: Donald J. Trump for President v. Benson
https://courts.michigan.gov/Courts/MichiganSupremeCourt/PublicInfoOffice/Documents/2020
1105%20Rspn%20Mtn%20Intervene.pdf
Court: State of Michigan Court of Claims
Status: Dismissed – November 6, 2020
www.michigan.gov/documents/ag/20201106_Opin_and_Ord_707156_7.pdf
Trump Versus Benson, Case 1:20-cv-01083
Court: Michigan Court of Appeals
Status: Withdrawn
Dozens of documents about this case are available at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/18619867/donald-j-trump-for-president-inc-v-benson/

23. www.journalistethics.com 22 Public Consultation Draft
Nevada
Complaint: Jim Marchant Versus Gloria
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/201123-Order.pdf
Court: Eighth Judicial Court in and for Clark County, State of Nevada
Status: Withdrawn
Complaint: Donald J Trump for President Inc. the Nevada Republican Party v. Gloria
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/NOE-DJT-2.pdf
Court: District Court, Clark County Nevada
Status: Withdrawn
Complaint: Law vs. Whitmer
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/nov-17-doc-2.pdf
Court: First Judicial District Court Carson County, Nevada
Status: Withdrawn
Complaint: Rodimer vs. Gloria
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Rodimer-v-Gloria_A-20-
825130-W_Writ-of-Mandamus.pdf
Court: District Court Clark County, Nevada
Status: Withdrawn – November, 2020
Becker vs. Cannizzaro
Court: District Court Clark County Nevada
Status: Dismissed – November 20, 2020
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Notice-of-voluntary-
dismissal.pdf

24. www.journalistethics.com 23 Public Consultation Draft
Becker vs. Gloria
Court: Nevada State Court
Status: Dismissed – November 16, 2020
Complaint:
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Complaint-Becker-v.-
Gloria.pdf
Stokke v. Cegavske
Court: Federal Ninth Circuit
Status: Dismissed – 5 November, 2020
https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=352
Complaint
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Stokke-v-Cegavske.pdf
New Mexico
Complaint: Donald J. Trump for President v. Oliver
Filed in the United States District Court of New Mexico on 14 December, 2020
www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/NM-Trump-v-Toulouse-
Oliver-Complaint.pdf
Court: United States District Court for the District of New Mexico
Status: Withdrawn

25. www.journalistethics.com 24 Public Consultation Draft
Texas
States of Texas et al. Vs. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Court: United States Supreme Court – Case No. 22O155
Status: Dismissed – December 11, 2020
Motion
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163470/20201210212807008_Motion%20for
%20Leave%20to%20File%20Amici%20Curiae%20with%20Brief%20and%20Appx%20A%20attach
ed.pdf
Motion for leave
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163393/20201210150111653_Brief.pdf
State of Texas, Plaintiff, v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Georgia, State of Michigan,
and State of Wisconsin
Original action
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163387/20201210145404465_22O155%20Tex
as%20MI%20BIO%2012-10.pdf
Motion for leave
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163383/20201210145849997_Georgia%20--
%20Brief%20in%20Opposition.pdf
Motion to intervene
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163234/20201209155327055_No.%2022O155
%20Original%20Motion%20to%20Intervene.pdf
Decision
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163048/20201208132827887_TX-v-State-
ExpedMot%202020-12-07%20FINAL.pdf

26. www.journalistethics.com 25 Public Consultation Draft
Wisconsin
Feehan vs. Wisconsin Elections Commission
Case dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction on December 9, 2020
Plaintiff also lacked legal standing.
Appealed to the 7th Circuit – December 16, 2020
www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/37598572/William_Feehan_v_Wisconsin_Elections_Com
mission,_et_al
Trump Versus Evers
Case No. 2020AP1971-OA
Court: Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Status: Petition denied
Complaint
https://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/supreme-court/2020/2020ap001971-oa.html
Response
www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311669
Trump et al. vs. Biden et al.
Court: Circuit Court Milwaukee County
Milwaukee County Case No. 20-CV-7092 (Consolidated)
Dane County Case No. 20-CV-2514 (Consolidated)
Status: Petitioned to bypass the Circuit Court system
Submission
www.thewheelerreport.com/wheeler_docs/files/120720mcctrumpcomplaint.pdf

27. www.journalistethics.com 26 Public Consultation Draft
Defendant’s response
www.thewheelerreport.com/wheeler_docs/files/120920mccfof.pdf
Trump Versus Biden
Court: Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Case No. 2020AP2038
Status: Ruled in favor of the respondents Biden et al. dated December 14, 2020
https://wscca.wicourts.gov/appealHistory.xsl?caseNo=2020AP002038&cacheId=36A70859E0B1
FC49830A4DADD92DC75F&recordCount=3&offset=0&linkOnlyToForm=false&sortDirection=DE
SC
Response: Supreme Court of Wisconsin
www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315395

28. www.journalistethics.com 27 Public Consultation Draft
Part C
Democracy Docket
50 states plus DC
www.democracydocket.com/state/nevada/

29. www.journalistethics.com 28 Public Consultation Draft
Forthcoming
This author may author a mini booklet – Part II – that summarizes specific allegations of election
fraud types. This classification may occur via theme e.g. alleged algorithm interventions.
December 28, 2020
Draft public consultation feedback
Dr J Jericho
Jay@Journalisthics.com
Tel. + 1 774 203 9920