Presented at the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Annual Meeting 2014 at the Gaylord Resort & Convention Center in Grapevine Texas, by Spencer Keralis, Kris Helge, and Laura Waugh. Abstract: The Open Access movement is transforming scholarly communication. Federal mandates for sharing the products of federally funded research drive scholars to rethink traditional scholarship models. The OA movement has been bedeviled by questions and misconceptions about intellectual property and copyright, peer review and quality control, predatory publications and other issues. This panel will address these concerns and help equip the AACP community with the resources to understand how Open Access can serve their scholarly endeavors.

1. AACP Annual Meeting
#RxOA #PharmEd14

2. #RxOA #PharmEd14

3. What is Open Access?
 Spencer D. C. Keralis
Research Associate Professor
@hauntologist
Institutional Repositories
 Laura Waugh
Repository Librarian
Intellectual Property &
Copyright
 Kris Helge
Scholarly Communications
Librarian
@KrisHelge
Discussion
#RxOA #PharmEd14

4. Spencer D. C. Keralis
Research Associate Professor
@hauntologist
#RxOA #PharmEd14

5. A set of principles about author rights and public
access that guide scholarly communications
strategies.

6. Scholars should be able to retain the rights to their work
Access to scholarship – especially publicly funded
scholarship – should be free
Public access to scholarship is good for society
Public access to scholarship is good for scholars
Transparency in research helps maintain the public trust
Transparency in research helps ensure good
science/scholarship

7. phdcomics.com

8. Scholars
 Retain the rights to your work
 Ensure the widest possible
dissemination of your work
 Teach with the best possible
research in your field
 Maintain the public trust in
higher education
Students
 Learn with the best possible
research in their fields
 Affordable or free access to
scholarly publications
 Model behavior as scholars and
educators

9. Open Access informs distribution model for journals
Evaluating publications
The double-dip
Subscriptions + APCs – your rights = Profit$
Green vs. Gold OA
Predatory OA

10. NIH and NSF led with mandates for open data and published
results in 2003 and 2010 respectively
Feb 2013 OSTP Memo expanded mandate to most federal
funding agencies
Agency guidance should arrive Fall 2014 – Spring 2015

11. SPARC
COAPI
R2R
Sherpa/Romeo
OASPA

12. Laura Waugh
Repository Librarian
@lauraswaugh
#RxOA #PharmEd14

13. What is an institutional repository?
 Institution/University-hosted
 Digital Infrastructure
 Research and Scholarly Output

14. What do institutional repositories do?
 Store, manage, and provide access
 You know where all of your files are
 You can permanently link to them
 Your research extends to the world

15. Types and Examples:
 Subject-based/Disciplinary Repositories
 National Repositories
 Institutional Repositories

16. Common Goal:
 Storage
 Management
 Preservation
 Re-use and Access

18. How does one develop an institutional
repository?
 Interest in Open Access grows
 Early Stages:
 UNT Open Access Policy
 Institutional Repository

19. Key Provisions:
 Peer-reviewed Journal Articles
 Promote greater access and impact
 Recognize societal responsibility
 Long-term preservation and curation

20. Key Challenges:
 Toothless
 Lack of Interest
 So, this doesn’t affect my promotion and tenure?

21. UNT Scholarly Works:
 Launched 2010
 Over 50 Colleges, Centers, Institutes
 Over 3,000 items + datasets!

22.  Articles
 Papers
 Reviews
 Books
 Chapters
 Posters
 Presentations
 Reports
 Patents

23. Versions of Work:
 Pre-Prints: submitted, not peer-reviewed
 Post-Prints: accepted, peer-reviewed
 Final PDFs: published version

24.  Submitted Version
 Before Peer-review
On the Solubility of Quercetin
Michael H. Abraham, a* William E. Acree, Jr b
a Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon St., London WC1H
0AJ, UK.
b Department of Chemistry, 1155 Union Circle Drive #305070, University of North
Texas, Denton, TX 76203-5017, USA
Abstract:
There is a considerable disagreement over the solubility of quercetin in water.
Experimental values of log Cw with Cw in mol/L range from − 2.52 to − 5.89, a
difference of over three log units. We have applied a methodology based on linear
free energy equations for water-solvent and gas-solvent partitions to study
solubilities. These are related to partition coefficients through Ps = Cs/Cw where Cs
and Cw are solubilities of a given solute in a solvent and in water. We find that
known solubilities of quercetin in methanol and ethanol at 298 K and a known
water-solvent partition coefficient can be accommodated in the same model if the
water solubility at 298 K, as log Cw, is taken as − 3.90, that is near to the middle of
the range of experimental values. Our model successfully predicts solubilities of
quercetin in water–ethanol mixtures near to the ethanol rich mixtures.
Keywords: Quercetin; Water-solvent partition coefficient; Gas-water partition
coefficient; Solubility; Linear free energy relationships; Abraham descriptors

25.  Accepted Version
 Peer-reviewed

26.  Published Version
 Typesetting
 Logos
 Formatting

28. Green Open Access:
 Self-archiving in a repository
 Certain versions of work
 No fees to authors or funding agency

29. Gold Open Access:
 Publishing in journals for a fee
 Fee = Article Processing Charges
 Paid by author or funding agency

30. Open Access Journal Definition:
 Funding model that does not charge
readers or their institutions for access
 Read, download, distribute, print, link-to, put
online, etc.

32. Most Common Questions:
 Why should I bother?
 Increased citations
 Wider access to research
 Benefits society and research innovation

33. Most Common Questions:
 What do IRs have to offer?
 Long-term preservation of your work
 Permanent URLs
 Item-level statistics

34. Considerations:
 Impact Factors
 Promotion & Tenure
 Metrics
 Copyright?

35. Kris Helge
Scholarly Communications Librarian
@KrisHelge
#RxOA #PharmEd14

36. Reproduce
Prepare Derivatives
Distribute
Perform
Display
Sound Recordings
 perform publicly by means of a digital audio transmission

37.  www.slubdd.de/oaw2013

38.  https://www.flickr.com/photos/rnjacobs/14490805681/in/photolist-nNj672-o5vaFg-o5iMu4-o4txL2-nJ3rdv-o1e2oL-nKZL1A-o3etzF-o4VvFA-nL7dk5-o1ym2u-nL6Zfi-nPgKuT-o4VVqQ-nKJZJC-
nL6jMC-o6P2Xa-o1ebYx-nMxYC6-nNjy62-o4gwbQ-o5aH5v-nMSZkU-nJi7Kh-o1K1cd-nLUMNh-o52ne6-nL6fT4-nKJMGw-o1GMya-nJbHHC-o2dM7T-nKYWgC-nMweXE-o472Z6-nMxRx6-
o3gzYq-nMxvum-o1bXUq-o5H6ft-nNjmDL-o3UZnt-o6Pjr2-nKJXGG-o1bTow-nMxQVz-o1bVoo-o2GSp6-nM4sb3-o1BxkG

40. Creative Commons
Getty Open Content Program
FreeDigital Photos
Wiki Commons
Morgue Files

41.  Allows creators to:
 Maintain their choice of rights
 Have freedom of use in their scholarship
 Freely distribute
 Have a lever for negotiating with publishers
 Also give publishers equal benefits

42. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pirate_Flag.svg

43.  https://www.flickr.com/photos/opensourceway/4638981545/in/photolist-7ZRTUP-82djZx-84VZAr-dZ2y6b-7fNVzm-azTdMo-4EvWY9-822bu2-4jkHD-axwagd-4WrJkA-eARcff-66r3T6-dRuMzt-
iCz9t-a9eGCW-9Mcwzt-46PRKe-5V3xR3-5V3uK5-7Cc8Ki-5V3u3N-48ybNM-5UYfeK-5UYfNP-Bcz4z-5UYdcT-5V3Csj-5V3x5C-5V3vo7-5V3zBJ-5UYaBc-5UYb7a-5V3Aoy-5V3BTy-5UY85p-
5UYhhB-5V3ECU-5V3wDh-nazSQM-hypjha-asybHk-acAJ26-4G4A74-tBVvp-6m1CYz-8346Yd-fMhdNU-ahk6nh-aov2Xi

44. #RxOA #PharmEd14