The North Central All-Hazards Emergency Management Region (NCR) for the State of Colorado contracted Critigen to develop a web-based GIS data portal where the ten NCR member counties could upload their spatial data to populate one common GIS database. Using a customized FME Server interface, users can upload spatial data and have it automatically translated into a common data model. Counties and other jurisdictions also reap the benefits when they download user-defined subsets of data for their own use into their own data schema. Additionally, the composite database supports an emergency preparedness planning tool, providing first response planners access to a continuous, region-wide dataset. In this session, you will learn how Critigen overcame the challenges faced in completing this project and will be given a view into the proposed next steps and potential applications beyond this effort.
2. Agenda
Introductions
Background and drivers for the project
Collecting information
Application design
System architecture
Challenges
Benefits
Next steps
Future applications
3. Introductions
Critigen– Denver, CO
Safe Software
The Colorado North Central All-Hazards
Region
Member Counties Boulder
Broomfield
Gilpin Adams
Denver
Clear Creek
Arapahoe
Jefferson
Douglas Elbert
4. Project Background
Emergency management planning focus
Need for continuous region-wide dataset
Coordination with member counties hard to
achieve
Homeland Security grant for 2007/2008
Additional grant for 2009/2010
6. Collecting Information
10 very different data schemas, from the very
simple to the very complex
PGDB
Coverages
Shapefiles
7. Collecting Information
Everything decided by committee, consensus
difficult to reach
Prototype application with 9 data layers
Roads
Parcels Phase 2 adds 15 additional
Parcel Owners layers including:
Census Blocks Parks/Open Space
Municipalities Trails
Address Points
Lakes FEMA Flood Zones
Streams Medical Facilities
Fire stations Etc.
Schools
8. Collecting Information
NCR data schema developed to house
translated data sets
Feature classes,
attributes, and
domains need to be
mapped and
translated
19. Data Download
Download Area Options
By Area – Drag a rectangle, define on map
By Point and Buffer, define on map
By Municipality – clip polygon
By County – by County field in attribute table
Schema Options
10 different counties plus NCR master schema
Coordinate System Options
UTM NAD83, 4 state plane, LL NAD83
Layer Options
Select any and all available data layers
22. System Architecture
Two servers, one primary, one redundant
Hosted at separate county locations
Douglas County – Primary
Denver County - Redundant
Automated replication between servers
FileReplication Pro replication software
Automated failover between the servers
DNS Made Easy
23. Challenges
Decision by committee
Lack of previous coordination between
counties
Disparities in GIS sophistication
Proprietary data concerns
Expanding beyond initial user community
24. Benefits
Unique planning tool with
seamless region-wide dataset
Dialog between counties
promotes better coordination
Edge matching
Data schema consolidation
Serve as a model for inter-region
and state wide coordination
25. Next Steps
Add more data layers
Medical facilities
Critical infrastructure
Etc.
Enhance existing data layers
Assist counties to identify and fill
gaps
Fire stations, schools
Add more viewer functionality
Geocoding service
Advanced spatial queries
Help counties work together to edge
match street centerlines