3. What is Connect the Dots?
• A collective effort to build a large social movement for children
and families
• Developing, promoting, and connecting actions that can be taken
by individuals, groups, communities, and policymakers
3
4. What motivates organizations
to get involved?
• New strategies and resources to help you engage the public in your
work in your state or community
• Concrete way for businesses and other non-traditional partners to
connect to child and family issues
• An inroad for engaging faith-based organizations and other
community institutions in building protective factors
• An opportunity to make a collective impact on issues we care about
4
5. What does it mean to call this “building a
movement”?
• Building a movement is more than marches and protests and enacting
laws; it is about developing leaders, building trust and mobilizing action
toward a common purpose.
• Building a social movement includes a variety of actions by individuals,
groups, organizations and others mobilizing to achieve a particular social
change.
• Actions may include specific campaigns and tactics as part of the
broader movement, but a social movement has a broader social impact.
6. How do you build a movement?
• Affirm
• Empower
• Educate
Individual
Actions
• Sense of
connectedness
• Relationships
Community
Engagement • Engage in
issues
• Mobilize
Policy
Advocacy
6
11. Examples: Individual dots
• “I volunteer as a mentor for parents who are involved in the child
welfare system”
• “I serve on my local school board”
• “I watch my neighbor’s toddler and preschooler when she has a
doctor’s appointment or just needs some time to herself”
• “I get together with other home child care providers once a month.
We help each other with ways to provide the best care we can to the
kids and how to take care of ourselves too!”
13. Examples: Community dots
• Family night at the laundromat – free laundry with pizza, child care
and parenting information provided
• Campaign to get to know your neighbors through trick-or-treating
• Training adults on how to prevent child sexual abuse
…and what’s happening in your neighborhood, community, state?
17. A case example: Baptist Convention
of New Jersey
In October of 2014, the General Baptist Convention of New Jersey voted to become
Strengthening Families churches. The pastor of each of these churches will sign a covenant
to promote the protective factors of families in their congregations. Reverend Darrell
Armstrong, an early adopter of Strengthening Families, developed the covenant as a tool to
engage clergy of any faith tradition in helping families to build protective factors as part of
their ministry.
• Over 300 churches in NJ will sign the covenant
• Protective factors have been aligned to key passages from scripture
• Training available for clergy and lay faith leaders on how to implement a protective
factors approach in their work with parishoners
Community
Institutions
18. A case example: Magnolia Place
What would it take to have the 35,000 children living in the neighborhoods within the 5-
square mile/500 blocks of the Magnolia Catchment Area break all records of success in their
education and their health, and the quality of nurturing care and the economic stability they
receive from their families and community?”
• Use SF protective factors as a philosophy to align practice among a network of 75
providers
• Baseline survey of 800 individuals on PFs
• Café conversations with community members about what PFs mean to them
• Dashboard—to examine monthly success in engaging families around PFs
• Using EDI to measure impact on school readiness
Service
Programs
19. Shared
Outcomes and
Measures
Magnolia Community Dashboard
15 August 2011
% of 3rd Grade Children Who are Proficient in Reading
% Parents of Children 0-5 with Protective Factors % Parents of Children 0-5 Achieving Family Goals
% Parents Reporting Reading to Their Child Daily Parent Experiences with Care (in the Community Overall and % Parents Reporting Ties to Neighbors
Overall and in Actively Improving Provider Settings)
% Parents Reporting Positive Relationship with Child % Parents Reporting Use of Bank Account % Parents Reporting Family-Centered/Empathetic Care
% Parents Discussing Resources for Families % Parents Asked About Developmental Concerns % Parents Asked About Family Stressors
% Parents Discussing Resources for Social Support % of Children Reached % Parents Asked About Depression
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
2010 2011 2012
AtLeast1Neighbor
YouCouldDiscuss
PersonalProblem
With
CanGet
MedicalCare
WhenNeeded
FlexibleWhen
LifeDoesn'tGo
AsPlanned
Social
Connections
(% with both)
Concrete
Support in
Times of Need
(% with all 6)
Resilience (%
with all 5)
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%100%
Through child care
% receiving care from this system
% reached by Magnolia Network partner
SafePlacesfor
ChildtoPlay
NotDepressed
FoodHasNot
RunOut
CaregiversSee
ChildRegularly
Social
Conditions
Parent
Health
Economic
Stability Parenting
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
2010 2011 2012
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
2010 2011 2012
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
2010 2011 2012
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
2010 2011 2012
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
2010 2011 2012
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
2010 2011 2012
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
2010 2011 2012
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
2010 2011 2012
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
2010 2011 2012
Has IEP
Area No. Comm Phys Lang Soc Emo 1+ 2+ (%)
Northwest 137 12 10 17 17 7 30 18 7
Southwest 15 27 0 0 13 13 40 13 --
Proportion of Kindergarten Children:
Developmentally vulnerable (%)
0 20 40 60 80 100
All children
"Children with parent <HS
educa on
No. Total number of children assessed
Comm Communication and general knowledge
Phys Physical health and wellbeing
Lang Language and cognitive skills 1+ Vulnerable on one or more domains
Soc Social competence 2+ Vulnerable on two or more domains
Emo Emotional maturity Has IEP Has special education plan
In actively improving doctor offices
In actively improving child care programs
In community overall
In actively improving family support programs
Goal
EDSI . EARLY
DEVELOPMENTAL
SCREENING
ANDINTERVENTION
INITIATIVE
20. Elderly poverty in the U.S. decreased
dramatically.
Between 1960 and 1995, the poverty rate of
those aged 65 and above fell from 35% to
10% and remains steady despite economic
recessions.
• Social Security
• Medicare
• Homestead exemptions
Policy
Advocacy
A case example:
Poverty Rates for Seniors
21. How can we
Connect our
Dots more
effectively to
achieve a
Collective
Impact?
23. Help us Connect the Dots
• Encourage others to join the movement by signing up at
http://www.whatsyourdot.org
• Spread the word with #whatsyourdot
• Let me know what resources and tools would be most useful to you
Jim McKay
TEAM for WV Children / Prevent Child Abuse WV
304-617-0099 – jim@teamwv.org
23
Editor's Notes
What would it look like…?
BRIEF comment on what norms theory means (success in other fields, now working into child maltreatment prevention)
Perceived norms vs. actual norms
Reclaiming a norm of connectedness
“Less cowboy, more barn-raising” (Lynn Davies)
Need to reclaim the norm that “we’re all in this together”
Public doesn’t understand how to prevent child abuse, but they do have ideas about how to support families
Each organization’s perspective on why this work matters
Starting with getting people to commit every day actions that make their communities better places for children and families:
Helping them to see the things they already do that strengthen families (their own and those around them)
Educating about what families need (framed in protective factors)
Empowering people to see that they can make a difference
Then engaging them at the community level
Fostering a sense of connectedness
Connecting with others who share their commitment to children and families
Building relationships with each other and with the organizations that can advance this work at the local and state level
Once people are engaged at the community level, we can start to engage them in issues and mobilize them to advocate for or against particular policies
You can have even more impact – touching the lives of many more children and families – when you share, get inspired by others, and connect to something bigger than yourself by being part of a national movement.
Mechanism we use to collect the stories
Highlight the strengths we can build upon
Motivation for collective action
Blue dots for organizations
Orange dots for specific actions taken
What would it look like if a community embraced Connect the Dots?
Individuals sharing their dots
Individuals connecting to each other based on those dots
Organizations sharing their dots
Organizations reaching out to the individuals who have shared their dots
Businesses sharing their dots
---all leading to
a greater sense of community
pride in being a community where children and families thrive
Increased opportunities to get involved and connect with others who care about children and families
Things we see happening at the community level that you could get involved in…
Bridge to policy advocacy – connecting the dots between policies and the effects they have on children and families
Julia Isaacs, Kathrine Toran, and Health Hahn, “Kids; Share 2012: Report on Federal Expenditures on Children through 2011,” Urban Institute, July 19, 2012. Retrieved from www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/412600-Kids-Share-2012.pdf.
Gary V. Engelhardt and Jonathan Gruber, “Social Security and the Evolution of Elderly Poverty,” National Bureau of Economic Research, pp.32. Retrieved from urbanpolicy.berkeley.edu/pdf/Ch6SocialEG0404.pdf .