"Some Experiments in Peer Review" - the PeerJ presentation to the ITHAKA Sustainable Scholarship 2012 meeting (http://www.ithaka.org/conference/ithaka-sustainable-scholarship-2012). Video of the presentation is at http://vimeo.com/53343232
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Some Experiments in Peer Review - PeerJ at the ITHAKA Sustainable Scholarship 2012 meeting
1. Academic Publishing is Evolving…
Some Experiments
in Peer Review
Pete Binfield
Co-Founder and Publisher, PeerJ
@p_binfield
pete@peerj.com
https://peerj.com
3. • Covers all of science
• Considers Research Articles only
• ~ 4,000 submissions / month & ~2,500 publications / month
• Peer reviews for scientific validity only
• All submissions go through stringent submission checks
– All submissions that pass those checks are peer reviewed
• ~ 4,000 Academic Editors
– Editors can accept with no external peer reviewers
– ~2.8 peer reviewers/article (1.8 + the Academic Editor)
– 1st
decision in approx. 33 days
– Avg of 1.1 revision rounds
• Includes post publication user comments and article level metrics
• APC: $1,350 / paper
4. • Hosted on a Wordpress platform (Annotum)
• Submissions made through an online xml authoring tool
• Covers discrete subject areas
• Accepts any article type (or parts of articles)
• Rapid decisions via Editorial Board / Reviewers
• ‘Instant’ publication
• Submissions can be revised
• DOIs and PubMed IDs are assigned
• Includes post publication user comments and article level metrics
• Free to publish, free to read
5. • In Beta right now. Launching in late 2012
• Accepts all article types, and data papers
• Effectively a cross between a preprint server and a journal
– Articles go online immediately
– Reviews are then solicited
• Reviewers get 3 options
– “Approved”; “Approved with Reservations”; “Not Approved”
– All reviews are open and credited
• As soon as 2 positive reviews are received, the article is ‘indexed’
– Uses CrossMark
• Authors can subsequently revise articles
• Includes post publication user comments
– Only from ‘verified’ academics
• APC: $500 / ‘short’ paper , $1,000 / ‘long’ paper
6. • Launching in late 2012
• ‘Independent’ Peer Review outside of a journal
– To improve an article pre-submission
– Or to pre-qualify an article to journals
• Employing a standard peer review scorecard
– With numerical scores
• Charging authors and paying reviewers
– Double blind peer review
– 3 reviewers
• Rapid review turnaround
– “The one week review that can save months of waiting”
• Pays reviewers $100 / review, charges authors ~$600 / paper
8. • Launching in late 2012
• A broad, inclusive journal
• Encouraging of Open Peer Review
– Reviewers have option to be named / credited
– Authors have option to publish peer review ‘audit’ trail with the article
• Peer review is a condition of Membership
• Includes post publication user comments and article level metrics
• Coupled to a preprint Server (“PeerJ PrePrints”)
– Which can accept a wide range of content
– With a range of privacy and access controls
• Membership model starting at $99 for life
9. Academic Publishing is Evolving…
The PeerJ Membership Model
Unlimited
publications/yr
Great for
principal
investigators
Basic Plan
$99
Lifetime
One publication/yr
Great for
graduate students
* All contributing authors need a plan membership
12. Academic Publishing is Evolving…
Current Status
• Staff of 5 (London & San Francisco)
– Alf Eaton (ex Mendeley & Nature)
– Patrick McAndrew (ex clipDO.com)
– Jackie Thai (ex PLoS ONE)
• ~ 700 Academic Editors & Advisors
– 5 Nobel Laureates
• Public Submissions to PeerJ ~ Late 2012
• Public Launch of PeerJPrePrints ~ Late 2012
• 1st
PeerJ Publications ~ Jan 2013