4th OpenAIRE Workshop - Legal and Sustainability Issues for Open Access Infrastructures
Nov. Vilnius
Perspectives, Ideas, success and challenges of sustainability models
DOAJ - Lars Björnshauge, Director SPARC Europe & Managing Director, DOAJ
1. Sustainability – the funding
model of DOAJ
OpenAIRE workshop: Legal and
Sustainability issues, November 5th 2013,
Vilnius
Lars Bjørnshauge
lars@doaj.org
2. Brief Background
• Founded 2003 at Lund University – launched May
2003 with 300 journals
• Initially funded by minor project grants from SPARC
and Open Society Institute.
• Additional grants from among others SPARC Europe,
INASP and OpenAccess.se.
• Membership and Sponsor funding model introduced
2006.
3. Higher expectations
•
•
•
•
Situation 2010/2011:
Increasing expectations as OA gets momentum.
Difficulties in getting resources as expectations grow.
As OA matures demands from funders and libraries
increase and become more differentiated and
advanced.
• Increasing backlog and
lack of curation of the collection.
5. Improvements
• New platform launched
• Facets search:
– language
– publication year
– license
– business model (APCs or not)
• Very good feedback!
6. Streamlining back office
• Journals added Jan-Oct 2013:
• (Journals added 2012):
2007
1248
• We are removing journals as well:
• August 1st – October 31st 2013:
• Journals added:
• Journals removed:
485
481
7. Staffing
• Staff:
• 5 part time – 3 FTE
• Maintenance & development outsourced to
Sempertool (www.sempertool.dk)
• Working from Copenhagen, Malmö &
Stockholm
11. There is much more
work to be done!
•
•
•
•
Implementation of new tighter criteria
Facilitating uptake of persistent identifiers
Facilitating archiving solutions
Facilitating contributions from the community
– ”associate editors”
12. Why thighter
criteria?
• Better opportunities for funders, universities,
libraries and authors to determine whether a
journal lives up to standards – transparency!
• Enable the community to monitor compliance
• Addressing the issue of fake publishers or
publishers not living up to reasonable standards
both in terms of content and of business
behavior.
• DOAJ SEAL – promote best practice
13. New criteria
•
•
•
•
•
•
New tighter criteria will address:
“Quality”
“Openness”
“the delivery”
They will be more detailed
Publishers will have to do more to be included
15. Promoting DOIs
• Discussions with
– OASPA
– INASP
– PKP
– Redalyc
• as to how to work together on this and with
CrossRef for efficient and affordable
arrangements
16. The challenge
related to archiving
• Many, many journals
– lack the financial & technical resources to go
beyond just publishing the content.
– haven´t adressed the archiving issue yet, but
would like to do so, provided smart and cheap
solutions are available.
• Discussions with OASPA, INASP, PKP, Redalyc,
CLOCKSS, Keepers Registry and approached by
Portico
17. - more than a list!
• Going beyond being a list of OA-journals and a
hub for article level metadata
• Engaging with the community to assist OAjournals to enter the mainstream
– Archiving, persistent identifiers etc
• Opening up for crowd sourcing of the editorial
work
19. • Would like to become part of a OAinfrastructure package
• But have to continue and develop the current
funding while waiting for the global OAinfrastructure committee to emerge and
generate results – we will contribute to this
process