Non-Profit College Tuition

Non-Profit College Tuition
"The only way to be successful and make a good living you must go to college," I've heard that
millions time's during High School. Thousands of students graduate each year and apply to
Universities. Waiting to see if they are accepted or not to the school. Some attend For–Profit
Vocational college's and other's go to Non–profit Universities. But, with admission is tuition, that is
a required to be paid each semester for a student. The price of tuition has skyrocketed excessively
throughout history. What happened to the cost of education? Why is tuition rising, have schools
become a business rather than an institution? What is more significant money or graduation rates for
the schools? http://www.harvard.edu/about–harvard/harvard–glance/history There is Non–profit
Private University's located all over the world. Students can study in the States or abroad overseas.
Therefore, the very first school constructed in America is in Cambridge, Massachusetts; "Harvard is
the oldest institution of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Using the reputation of the school, for their profit. For Profit, vocational colleges promise faulty
certifications with nine weeks of training. The Vocational school using aggressive recruiting ads on
TV, containing high job placement after graduation propaganda. Students are taking out loans for
college each year. The loans cover the tuition, but only if you sell your soul to your lender. Money
lent and spent towards overpricing tuition and expensive books and supplies. Money is spent
everywhere in schooling business. All forms of colleges are dipping their toe in the money pool. The
high spike in tuition rates over the past years show, money over morals. Higher education will
always be around in the world. In America and overseas prices will continue to drive up, and state
officials will try to make it cheaper for the student. The only way to succeed in life is to sell your
soul and go to
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Old European Derived Model Of The American University
Although the present role of higher education is hotly contested, its origins aren't. Higher education
in the US was created as a way to maintain class distinctions. The old European derived model of
the American university was not the center of liberal intellectual curiosity it has evolved to today,
but rather a religious haven for students of wealthy families who attended in order to become
clergymen. Though the religious presence at these institutions has largely diminished, the
overwhelming presence of students of primarily wealthy backgrounds remains. Only recently have
colleges, with little avail, attempted to reverse this trend. Non–profit colleges, including two year,
four year public, and private colleges are still, on average ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Despite fluctuations, the funds that are invested, not including donations, have generally been been
on track for nearly 4% increases every year since 2000 and accounting for the losses during 2009.
Endowment funds, on average, are showing returns beyond the incremental increases in operational
costs, yet there seems to be no signs of increasing affordability within these institutions. This points
to a clear lack of intention of these institutions to allow the expansion of socioeconomic diversity
within these universities. However, statistics still indicate that socioeconomic mobility is facilitated
by the presence of these institutions. Most of the movement between classes happens between the
middle and upper class. In addition to minimal representation in these institutions, lower income
students find little to no opportunities for socioeconomic movement. In fact, 65% of the bottom two
fifths income stay in the bottom two fifths.
The structure of the college financing system is a root of the suppression of socioeconomic equality,
College financing is divided primarily into three options, aside from parental funding. Institutional
financial grants should provide the bulk of the unmet cost of attendance. However, financial grants
provided by universities are all contingent on how inclined the university is to broaden
socioeconomic diversity. The universities that generally provide this type of funding are the same
universities with high

For-Profit Colleges
"The Booming Business of For–Profit Colleges" Higher education is a very profitable field, and
because of that, for–profit schools have been placed under scrutiny. In the documentary College
Inc., Michael Smith, the correspondent, investigates the promise and tremendous growth of for–
profit colleges in the higher education industry. With the student's best interests in mind, many
people have begun to question the integrity of these schools. However, they do not take into account
the benefits that these for–profit colleges can offer to non–traditional students, giving them the
opportunity to obtain a quality education, and marketable job skills. For–profit colleges are
continuously accepting the abundance of students who have realized ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Sherry Haferkamp, a graduate from Argosy University–Dallas says she believed a lot of lies that
were told to her, and it was not until after the fact that she realized they were anything but the truth.
When she talked to an enrollment counselor at Argosy, he said "You know, instead of applying for
the master's program, go ahead and apply for the doctorate program. They've got two spots
available, so you better apply right now." After obtaining her degree, and accumulating over 100,000
dollars in federal student loans, Sherry finds out that her degree is not even accredited by the
American Psychological Association. She feels that she is at a dead end, and filed a lawsuit claiming
that she was defrauded. The documentary College Inc., was effective in its purpose of showing the
importance of for–profit schools. A large number of students who would never have been accepted
into a traditional college, have now been given the opportunity to obtain a degree. Investors who
have put money into these failing colleges have profited a great deal. Michael Clifford turned
traditional colleges that were in a downward spiral, and close to shutting down into successful for–
profit schools. Even though the documentary shows a few students who are unhappy with their
experiences, it seems that more people have benefited from these colleges than those who have not.

Essay Why Student Athletes Should Be Paid
Sports are one the best television programs that anyone can watch for entertainment. Anyone at a
young age until to their oldest time can participate in any way in sports. Some individuals can
participate as athletes, coaches, fan clubs, and team managements, however, participating or joining
teams can differ from pays or rewards. In college, students has been participating in clubs and sports
to get involved in school for requirements or due to scholarships. Specifically, student athletes who
plays sports in college seems to get the most attention in college due to their entertaining and
competitive games. As fun as it sounds, the universities whom student athletes play for gain huge
profits from revenues due to these events, yet the rise ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These two sports are the most popular sports across America especially for students from high
schools who are dreaming to become pro athletes. Due to its popularity, there are numbers statically
proven that the National Collegiate Athletic Association and universities itself gain huge profit from
their student athletes playing in their college leagues from advertisements and televising contracts.
Stanley Eitzen statically argued that "NCAA has signed a $6,200,000,000, 11–year deal," giving the
rights to CBS channel to televise the NCAA men's basketball championship and $930,000,000 with
ABC to televise the college football Bowl Championship (Eitzen,2005). Eitzen claimed NCAA is
gaining all the profit from college athletes participating in their sports which he argued that it's
unfair and college athletes should be paid as well due to NCAA or Universities earnings. 3)It is
understable why this argument can be valid due to the huge earnings that these association and
universities receives as athletes absorb more attention for them while these hard working athletes
devote their time to these sports.Clearly, it can be understandable why one might argue student
athletes deserve to get paid because of they are the reason these associations and universities attract
more profits for their school and also attract future student

College Athletes Should be Paid Essay
College sports are big business. For many universities, the athletic program serves as a cash–
generating machine. Exploited athletes generate millions of dollars for the NCAA and their schools,
and never see a dime. In terms of profit, if all ties with the university were eliminated, an athletic
program acting as its own separate entity could compete with some fortune 500 companies. So, why
do the vital pieces of the machine, the players, fail to receive any compensation for their
performance? The answer lies in the money–hungry NCAA and their practice of hoarding all the
revenue. College athletes should receive payment for their play to make their college experience
more bearable because they create huge profits and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Opponents against paying student–athletes say that they should not be paid because through
scholarships, they're already being paid. Yes, a scholarship is a form of payment. A scholarship is
nice, but it is not enough. A scholarship will not pay the bills. Moreover, unlike ordinary students
without athletics, student–athletes must also many times care for families and spouses. Actually,
approximately 24% of student athletes are married, and of that 24%, about 62% have children. Of
the students without their own spouses or children, many must care for parents and siblings. It
wouldn't hurt universities to give back a little. The average Division One School profits $6 million
per year on basketball and football alone. Consider that, some universities such as the university of
Florida or University of Michigan profit more than $10 million per year on their respective athletic
programs. At least three–college football teams; Michigan, Florida, and Notre Dame, are each worth
more than the NFL's Detroit Lions. Today, networks and cable channels pay hundreds of millions of
dollars for the right to televise college football games. NCAA basketball, which has its wildly
popular March Madness, is currently in the middle of a contract that pays almost $2 billion.

Should Students Pay For College? Essay
Being an undergraduate student and transferring from a community college I began to wonder the
cost to join a university. I know that it's rather cheaper to do the first two years at a community
college rather than going straight to Kinarda university. Each year, tuition is rising and more
students begin to take out loans to obtain their educational degree. After doing research I discovered
there is a lot that goes in to the price students pay to attend school. Paying for college is like a
partnership. The federal government, states, institutions, foundations and individual students and
their families all have a role in paying for college. The government ensures equal educational
opportunity through student aid programs. States also assure access by subsidizing public colleges to
keep tuition cost within reach of their citizens. Institutions also come into play for paying tuition.
Institutions aim to maximize quality and minimize tuition inflation. However institutions never
charge tuition equivalent to the full cost of a college education. We also discussed in class that
private foundations and other organizations provide private funding to institutions. Some donors
provide scholarships that are allocate directly to students.
Furthermore, what I really enjoyed discussing in this class was about for–profit institutions and how
they work. According to research, many observers of higher education opposed for–profit colleges
and universities spending high dollars on

15 Most Affordable Online Schools
15. Western Governors University
Western Governors University has 53 online degree programs to choose from, for an annual tuition
of less than $15,000 each. This school offers one of the most affordable online accounting degrees.
The annual tuition for the accounting program is $5,780. The Business degree program, also offered
at the same price, is one of the most affordable. This public, non–profit school is fully accredited by
the Distance Education and Training Council Accrediting Commission. Western Governors
University was founded in the year 1997 and offers 48 online degree programs as well as 6 online
certification programs.
14. Eastern New Mexico University
Eastern New Mexico University has an outstanding affordable Business degree program that costs
$4, 217 annually. The annual tuition for any of the 22 degrees offered there is less than $15,000.
This a public, non–profit institution accredited by the North Central Association of Colleges and
Schools, The Higher Learning Commission.
13. Fort Hays State University Online
This institution stands out for offering affordable degrees in Counseling, Human Resources,
Information Technology & Computer Science and Nursing. The annual cost of each of these degree
programs is $5,555, $5,778, $3,472 and $5,642 respectively. Boasting the most prestigious form of
accreditation, Fort Hays University Online is a public, non–profit regionally accredited school. The
accrediting agency is the North Central Association of

Nonprofit Vs. Non-Profit Research
In higher education, institution carry themselves differently depending on the mission and if they are
for–profit. The difference between for–profit and nonprofit is that for–profit institutions tend to be
concerned with making a profit even though it might not be for the best interests of their students,
nonprofit institutions are legally bound to put their profit back into the institution. Some in the for–
profit sector have been shifting from being for–profit to nonprofit. Some institutions are either
buying out the for–profit institutions or converting to nonprofit. Purdue University is planning to
acquire Kaplan University. The reasoning behind this acquisition is Purdue University plans to use
Kaplan University as a vendor for marketing, online education and technology, and student
recruitment. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Colleges and universities should be concerned with education the whole student so that when a
student completes their major that they can be critical think and analyze themselves, their chosen
profession, and lives. Nonprofit institutions to run efficiently must consider profits but, for the right
reasons. Big–time sports programs are a perfect example. Some college that have big–time sports
programs are concern mostly if their student athletes are eligible so that they can sell tickets and
merchandise for a profit. This works for the short term goals of revenue but, neglects that if the
student was educated and prepare for life that those would actually give back more money based off
their positive experience they had while attending the college, in hopes that other future students
could have a similar experience. This why higher education should be nonprofit because learning
and discovering should be about profit, rather developing the whole person so that they can
contribute to the world in a positive

Should Traditional Education Be At Fault Politically?
We have met the enemy and he is us (Kelly, 1953)! That famous line uttered by Pogo sums up my
feeling about public/ private universities, and the relationship that we have had with for–profit
schools. It has been very easy for us to place the blame on the for–profit sector as causing the
student debt crisis, but in this concept paper I wanted to discuss where traditional education might
be at fault politically. In other words, how were we responsible for helping to create the debt
monster through behavior and policy?
Students enroll in college to learn. This acquiring of knowledge is so important that most schools
like Marshall University have instituted a required general education program to teach composition,
communication, math, natural science, social science, humanities, fine arts, and critical thinking
(GED, 2015). Yet the same universities that make the assumption that students are ignorant in
general education, feel they are sophisticated enough to make major financial decisions that include
assuming several thousand dollars in student debt. It is too easy for students to borrow money and
colleges have embraced that fact. I used to blame the students for their financial misgivings, but
higher education institutions are as much to blame as anyone. We must ask ourselves when the last
time a university said, "we're making enough money so no tuition increase this year."
Students are marketed to relentlessly by banks telling them borrowing is the way to get

Essay On College Athletes Should Be Paid
In America people are paid for virtually anything nowadays; but for some reason we hold our
superiorly achieving college athletes to a different moral standard where they showcase their highly
profitable talents for free. College athletes such as Ben Simmons and Lonzo Ball, whose names
alone bring in sell out crowds everywhere they go, are not paid, yet bring in insurmountable of
profit to universities that not otherwise be possible. This begs the question: Do college athletes
deserve to be paid for their time, skill, and profit they bring to the universities? College athletes
should get paid for their play due to the fact that their job is working for their teams, the university
makes enormous amounts of money off of them, and sometimes a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Perhaps, if student athletes were paid for their time, the number of student athletes living below the
poverty line would decrease from 86%. A second justification for compensating student athletes is
also a more well known one which is tied to the amount of money universities bring in from the
sporting events these athletes perform in. According to Forbes, the University of Texas in Austin
Longhorn Football team brought in over 78 million dollars in profit for the football program and
university in a single year. While a portion of this profit certainly goes towards building the football
program, including scholarships for these athletes, there is certainly a pot of earnings remaining that
could be shared with these players who offered their talents for free, yet, helped to bring that money
into the coffers. This is especially true of culminating events in college basketball such as the very
popular end of the season tournaments. It is no secret that March Madness, the most competitive
display of basketball players in the world, brings in big money. Research completed by PR
Newswire explains how much money the NCAA profited from the three week period that is March
Madness: "Ticket sales, television, radio, alumni donations, royalties and NCAA distributions,
combined bring in over $6.1 billion in annual revenue to colleges." (Pulsamy 1) From the outside
looking in, there

College Vs University Essay
1.What is the difference between a college and a university? Explain in five or more sentences.
University is an institution of higher education that provides undergraduate studies that leads to a
baccalaureate degree. Also, graduate studies leading to advanced degrees in at least three academic
and professional fields. Universities offer full undergraduate and graduate programs, there are
multiple schools within its system.
College is a postsecondary educational institution that provides instruction beyond the 12th grade
level in programs that meets the requirements for a associate, bachelor's, or graduate level degree.
Colleges offer more options and often don't offer master's programs.
a.Name two local universities that were once colleges
University of Florida and Keiser University are two local universities that were once colleges.
2. What is the difference between a public and private institution? Five or more sentences please.
Private institutions don't receive funds from state legislatures they depend on tuition and private
contributions, this is why their tuition is much more than a public institution
The income of public money is why tuition is lower at a public institution. Private institutions are
much smaller than public institutions and may have only a few thousand students. Public
universities and colleges can be big, and some are huge. Private institutions keep classes small, with
easy access to professors. At public

Why Do You Think They Are Called For-Profit Colleges Summary
Why Do You Think They're Called For–Profit Colleges? Kevin Carey is direct with what he believes
is wrong with for–profit universities. He believes that they do offer classes that may be a better
option for non–traditional or low–income students. However, these universities are doing these
while scamming taxpayers throughout the country. These universities receive millions of dollars in
funding from the government in grants and are still able to make a profit, although, many students
are unable to repay their student loans in a timely manner. Some personnel within these universities
use tactics to convince students to apply for loans, knowing that it is not a financially intelligent
decision. Not only is this borderline unethical, but many students that receive these loans default on
the payments. The for–profit universities are even attempting to change the funding from the current
90/10 rule, which states, the amount of federal funding cannot exceed 90 percent of total revenue.
One quarter of all of federal aid is given to for–profits, even though, they account for less than 10
percent of students. Considering this information, government funding would be better served
elsewhere. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many of these schools provide night classes that accommodate students who have full time jobs.
There are also multiple fortune 500 companies who have partnered with for–profit schools to
provide educational opportunities for their employees. For–profit universities have also bought out
colleges that would had to close their doors for good. Accreditation is also becoming more common
among for–profit universities so some degrees will hold the same value as one from a traditional

College Athletes Should Be Paid
Every year, especially around the March Madness basketball tournament, the same question arises:
should college athletes be compensated for the time they put into their sport? Supporters state the
compensation of student–athletes is necessary in today's system of college athletics. However,
others argue payment of collegiate athletes should not become mandatory and is unnecessary.
Therefore, some believe student athletes should be financially compensated for their efforts because
they are not benefiting from their hard work, but others already consider college athletes to be be
paid because they are compensated in forms other than money. The issue of paying college athletes
has become increasingly debated recently– in the past not paying the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Because student–athletes devote hours of their time and hard work to the sport they play many
people argue that they deserve to be paid like it is their job. People in favor of paying college
athletes, like Howard P. Chudacoff, state "that most big–time athletes devote 40–60 hours a week
practicing, playing and traveling for their sport." Here, he explains exactly how much time athletes
do have to put into their sport: enough to make the sport like a full–time job. So if a student is
playing a college sport in putting in the same number of hours as a full–time job shouldn't the
athlete receive at least some form of financial compensation? Even though supporters provide a
persuasive argument for paying student–athletes, the critics provide an equally persuasive argument
relating to the scholarships athletes receive. Critics argue that "Although players are not paid, they
are often given athletic scholarships to attend college" ("Paying College Athletes"). Because players
receive scholarships to attend college some believe this is compensation enough and colleges should
not be required to compensate the students further. Most athletes who receive scholarships attend
college at no cost to them– an opportunity most young people would be grateful to have. Supporters
argue further that because of the hard work college athletes put in they make money for their
school– students should be financially compensated for their profit–producing effort. In today's
world of college athletics where colleges make millions of dollars every year, it is reasonable to
assume that the athletes producing that money should receive a portion of it. In the article "Paying
College Athletes," it expresses "that players should be paid simply because their

Athletes College Athletes
Should collegiate athletes get paid? Statistics show that an average college athlete spends 20 hours
per week on their sport (University of Notre Dame). All the time dedicated to their sport takes away
time to complete homework, eat, work, and rest. College athletes should receive compensation for
the amount of time dedicated to their sport, for the amount of revenue brought into the university or
college, to be able to better support themselves and their family and benefit from the profit made by
apparel company contracts with the university or college.
Playing a sport in college, especially at Division 1 schools are very time consuming between
practicing and playing games. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) allows 20
hours of practice a week for athletes, but practices often last longer ("How do College Athletes...").
Collegiate athletes often do not have enough time to set aside for their classes. Many of these
athletes are spending more time playing their sport than managing their schoolwork. If the athletes
do not show up to every practice, then they tend to feel uncommitted and disincluded. According to
an NCAA survey on college athletes, the most demanding sports are Division 1 and Division 2
baseball. Division 1 basketball and football are very demanding as well (O'Shaughnessy). All
athletes have to make sure they establish their priorities for their sport and academics. College
athletes should finish their most difficult tasks first, then they can

Student Debt Crisis And The Housing Crisis
There is a critical financial trend in the United States: student debt is at an all–time high. For the
first time in mid– 2013, student debt rose to 830 billion, surpassing the credit–card debt (Clemmitt).
Many economists and scholars compare the student debt crisis to the housing bubble, which resulted
in a nationwide recession 2008. In a senate hearing regarding the current student debt crisis, Illinois
Attorney General Lisa Madigan said, "The warning signs are there, just like they were before the
housing crisis, and congress needs to act before it is too late" (Bidwell). After graduation, many
students find it difficult to repay their debt, due to the bleak job market. According to a report
published on the financial website Smart money, ten percent student loans borrowers defaulted in
2010 (Clemmitt). The percent was larger for students that attended a for–profit educational
institution, like a career college; fifteen percent of these students defaulted (Clemmitt). Although the
default rates do not contribute to the increasing student debt, one can compare it to the mortgage
crisis when people stopped paying their mortgages and the American economy crashed. This
exemplifies the critical problem that the student debt bubble if burst; it can have devastating impacts
on the vulnerable American economy. Three causes for the increase in student debt are due to recent
trends in college attendance, the increase of for–profit colleges and the rise of tuition due to
spending

SNHU Case Study Essay
Southern New Hampshire University This case study discusses the differences between Southern
New Hampshire University (SNHU) and other well–known universities such as Berkley, Harvard
and Stanford. For instance, SNHU College of Online and Continuing Education is not vanity
project, unlike other big name colleges such as Harvard and Stanford who offers online classes for
its purpose of mostly a branding exercise (Pearce & Robinson, 2015). Furthermore, SNHU differs
from other colleges in their admissions processes, graduation rates, lower prices, and the way they
address quality in their programs (Kingkade, 2014). SNHU is one of the fastest growing and most
dynamic private, non–profit universities in the country (Pearce et al., 2015). According ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The quality of online college education and the value of one's degree is a prospective that online
students must always consider. Pappano (2011) states, prospective online students must always
weigh the "stigma in various industries about whether an online degree is 'as good as' ". Therefore,
SNHU should consider differentiating it brand to stand out from its competitors. The institution
should focus its marketing and online presence on areas of its admissions processes, lower prices,
graduation rates, and the way they address quality in their programs. According to Miller (2014),
"With the intense competition out there, colleges have discovered they must have some strong
academic niche or other type of distinctive identity that makes them stand out in the crowd, for the
purpose of attracting prospective scholars". Additionally, Dvorak and Busteed (2015) states, "By
strategically rethinking the three components of the institution's identity –– purpose, brand and
culture –– with the intention of establishing unique and outcome–focused values, leaders can create
clear and compelling statements that distinguish their institution from all

What Is Public Good?
An institution is an organization that is created in order to help structure and order society by
providing a framework for cooperative activity. In the United States, the institution of higher
education has played a crucial part in organizing and structuring society by providing the populace
with the soft skills they will eventually need on the job. This institution consists of three branches –
private non–profit, public non–profit, and private for–profit universities – that go about different
routes to acquire the essential resources to obtain substantial funding and increase enrollment. As a
result of being a guide for students of the U.S. to enter the workforce and a promoter of innovation
and social development, the institution of higher ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In return, they are given the perks of being exempt from taxes and eligible for public and private
grants. Nevertheless, both non–profit universities have too many expenses that are completely
unrelated to education, such as building absurdly expensive real estate and spending loads of cash
on their intercollegiate athletics teams. These unrelated and profiting activities seem to then become
the priority for these institutions. For example, NYU is the third largest landowner in NYC, but the
university does not pay a single penny in either property or income tax. However, the university
argues that while annual revenues for the year of 2014 were $2.6 billion, the estimated contribution
to the economy of New York City was $2.2 billion. By providing an education that will always have
value and that will last as a brand, these non–profit universities have gradually created more so an
asset than a public good. However, there is nothing wrong with providing an extremely valuable
asset for the people, as long as it can be provided to all with equal

Should Student Athletes Get Paid Essay
The crackle of pads and the sounds of whistles. Flags flying everywhere and bodies crashing each
other. Football players these days put their bodies and their lives on the line when they go out on the
field everyday. This being said, is it time for college athletes to get paid to play. As a result of sports,
universities are receiving hundreds of millions of dollars of profit and coaches and staff are getting
paid millions, yet the athletes that bring the university and coaches the wins and the success are
getting no additional funds. I believe that it is time that student athletes get paid for their
contributions to the success that they bring to their universities. One reason why student athletes
should get paid is because of the unfair financial gains that universities are making at the expense of
the athletes. College sports now is a billion dollar industry, with universities making hundreds of
millions of dollars every year from ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Is it right for college coaches to be making millions of dollars and the athletes that help bring
success to these coaches make nothing but receive an academic scholarship? Is it right for
universities to keep the NCAA and amateur enterprise in order to exploit athletes and the economic
system to avoid taxes and maximize profits? The answer to these questions is a precarious no. Some
may say, "Why mess with a system that has been working for ages and give money to athletes that
already are receiving a free education?" And although this may be true, maybe it is time to help the
athletes that help make this business a very profitable enterprise by sharing the billions of dollars
that college sports brings into universities and the NCAA to those that help make it

Essay on Paying College Athletes
College sports are big money makers now a days. For most universities, the athletic department
serves as one of the main sources of cash flow. Athletes are used to create millions of dollars for the
NCAA and the schools that they participate in, and never receive a penny. If we are talking about
profit, if all bonds with the university were removed, an athletic department representing itself could
compete with some of the most successful companies. So, why does the most important parts of the
machine, the players, do not receive any money for their training and participation? The answer lies
in the NCAA which keeps all the money and their practice of keeping all the revenue for future use.
College athletes should be paid for their ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This leaves basically give no time to earn money. The way life is for a student athlete is very
different from what a regular student's life is. A student–athlete is required to attend practice for 10
to 20 hours per week which is around 4 hours a day, traveling to games everywhere throughout the
season, and at the same time, having to deal with the same amount of academic work as regular
students. Everyone who is against paying student–athletes rely on the fact that they get paid through
scholarships, so apparently they're already getting paid. Yes, a scholarship indeed is a form of
compensation. A scholarship is good to have, but it is not enough to go through life as a student–
athlete. A scholarship will not cover the bills. Not only that but, unlike regular students without
athletics, student–athletes must also most of the time take care of their families and spouses. Believe
it or not many student athletes are married, and most of the athletes married have children. The
students which don't have spouses or children, most of them have to care for parents and siblings.
Universities would not get financially hurt if they would decide to pay players just a little. The
average Division One School profits around $6 million per year only on football and basketball.
Universities like University of Florida or University of Michigan have profits of more than $10
million per year on all their

College Scorecard Case Study
In a push for education equality and against exploitation by for–profit colleges, the Obama
administration has unveiled a "College Scorecard" highlighting schools with the biggest bang for
your buck.
The end–product of a two–year investigation of 7,000 institutions of higher education, the College
Scorecard differs from other university ranking systems by comparing college costs to graduation
rates, loan repayment rates, and average post–graduate salaries. The resulting college search engine
tool, available at collegescorecard.ed.gov, encourages recipients of Pell grants and student loans to
apply to schools with high graduation rates and post–graduate salaries.
The Obama administration is also sharing the data it found with major college ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
One of the purposes of College Scorecard is to make prospective students as business–minded as
these colleges: if schools only care about their bottom line, then students deserve to be able to use
the same logic, choosing a school based on how likely they are to graduate from it and find a well–
paid job, based on how much they have to pay for it.
Obama's Dream, Partially Realized
Obama first announced this plan two years ago. But back then, it was more ambitious: not only
would it rank all 7,000 schools based on their "worth" from a student perspective, but it would even
penalize high–cost, low–reward universities and for–profit colleges by restricting their access to Pell
grants and Federal student loans, shifting these benefits to more "worth–it" schools. The idea was
that taxpayers should not be subsidizing tuition that profits institutions more than students.
The idea garnered scathing criticism. Much of it came from presidents of the very high–cost
universities and for–profit schools who would have been penalized by the program. They paid to
lobby against the plan and save their backs. They seem to have

Should Athletes Have More Disposable Income Outside Of...
"The recent explosion of revenues flowing to NCAA member institutions and the relative pittance
going to the primary input–the players–for those participating in bowl games and the annual "March
Madness" men's basketball tournament have created growing unease over the distribution of the
largesse (Sanderson 116)." Players in the National Collegiate Athletic Association or NCAA are
looking for financial aid outside of their academics. The NCAA feels an increasing need to
distribute more financial aid towards student–athletes, and they would like "to consider changing
restrictions on athletes' opportunities to earn income beyond their grants–in–aid" (Sanderson 117).
This will allow athletes do have more disposable income outside of their studies. For a more
detailed study on the topic, Allen R. Sanderson and John J. Siegfried dig into the economic side of
paying college athletes in their Journal for Economic Perspectives: "The Case for Paying College
Athletes". With the rapid advancement of technology and social media, the National Collegiate
Athletes Association is becoming monopolistic in their large–scale commercialized sports programs.
The resources are being allocated to different companies involved in the profit making off of student
athletes. The NCAA is developing ways to make collegiate sports more competitive, and one of
these ways is to pay the athletes participating in big sports programs such as men's basketball and
football. Their argument is that college

Should Student Athletes Be Paid
One of the most controversial topics involving the NCAA and college sports is the issue of student
athlete compensation. Proponents of paying college athletes say that the student athletes who
participate in basketball and football bring in large revenues for their universities, the NCAA, and
the networks broadcasting games. Student athletes should not be compensated because most
universities do not gain revenue from college athletics, they are being educated, not exploited, and
athletes are treated like campus royalty and have far more perks than everyone else.
First of all, student–athletes should not be paid because not all universities make a profit from
college athletics. In an article by David Welch Suggs, Ph.D., the associate professor ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
A great example of this is the John E. Jaqua Academic Center for Student Athletes at the University
of Oregon. According to an article on Sirs Issues Researcher, this building is made of sparkling glass
and stainless steel, with 40,000 square feet of spaces for college education. These spaces include an
auditorium with 114 leather seats, 35 tutor rooms, 25 academic and life advising offices, a
conference room, a computer lab, a graphics lab, a library, and a lobby with a wide flat screen TV
and plush sofas (Chudacoff). Every one of these spaces is outfitted with state of the art equipment.
The author of this article, "Let's Not Pay College Athletes," states that virtually all the rooms,
technology, and staff are reserved for varsity athletes (Chudacoff). He also noted that the Jaqua
Center "may be extreme in extravagance," but it is similar to facilities at other elite sports schools
like Alabama, Michigan, and Nebraska (Chudacoff). Athletes in very popular sports like basketball
and football have benefits that compare with professional athletes (Chudacoff). College athletes
have the best coaching, the best medical care, the best trainers, the best weight and conditioning
equipment, therapy pools, and devices to speed recovery (Chudacoff). They also receive high
quality athletic gear from companies like Nike and are fed nutritious meals

Should College Football Players Be Paid
Blake Spradley
Prof. Campbell
English 102
7 April 2017
Should College Football Players be Paid In the United States, sports are seen as an escape from the
real world and have become a huge entertainment industry. One of if not the most popular and
profitable sports in the country is college football. In every state across the country, thousands of
people pack into stadiums on Saturday to see their favorite team play. For many universities, one of
the departments that makes the most revenue is the athletic department. Even here at Coastal, which
is not a big time college football program, the university makes large amounts of money off of the
football team and the players are not compensated monetarily. A majority of the time, the atheltes ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
College football rising to be one of the most popular sports has put a huge price tag on big game
tickets. The athletes never see a dime of the millions made off the championships that they grinded a
long season to get to. Under the management of the NCAA, there has been a drastic increase in how
popular college football is. Today, College football is only second in popularity to the most popular
sport in the country, the NFL. What makes the sport so popular is every single state has a college
football team to root for and most states have a big–name division 1 team. The large supply of
college football meets and equally large demand and the effect of every city having a home town
team makes this sport extremely popular. If you look at the top ranked football teams of last year,
none are in major cities. In the top five you have: Tuscaloosa, Columbus, Louisville, Ann Arbor, and
Clemson. In most of the cities mentioned football on Saturday is king. In these five cities on
Saturday night everyone stops what they are doing and watches their favorite team play. The fact
that these small towns can have nationally recognized programs plays a role in the popularity of
college football. TV contracts also boosts college football's popularity and increases revenue
exponentially. Games that are nationally televised gives national exposure to small town schools.
TV are actually what makes schools so much money off athletics. TV networks pay ridiculous
amounts of money for the rights to broadcast the schools football team, stuffing the pockets of the
university. Marc Tracy of The New York Times writes, "Under the championship playoff format that
began this season, ESPN is paying $7.3 billion over 12 years to telecast seven games a year"
(Tracy). ESPN and other networks are willing to pay billions of dollars to see college athletes
compete without any

College Culture
Culture is characterized differently at every university, depending on the type of institution,
academic goal/concentrations, and its mission.
At Grinnell College, being a small–private liberal arts university creates a culture of creating a well–
rounded student. The focus is in shaping a student's educations in all the areas of study for them to
be well–equipped for the ever–changing workforce. It also states that they seek a well diverse
student and faculty body with different cultural backgrounds.
The University of South Carolina is a larger public university and one of their main goals for
students is for them to be active in their community. In addition, the university serves students from
a diverse background and provides different types of education being in–classroom or ... Show more
Their main goal is to provide their students with a flexible form of education. Providing student with
a quick and affordable education is their main priority.
In the other hand, University of Phoenix is a for–profit institution and creates a different culture.
Part of their mission is, "To generate the financial resources necessary to support the University's
mission". Their mission statement of providing students with the best education is superficial. In
reality, based on the current issues that for–profit institutions are facing, their main goal is creating a
profit.
I have always liked the structure of liberal arts colleges, because of their main objective of shaping a
student's education in all areas of study. Grinnel College type of education is the most appealing to
me, as it provides students with a well–rounded education. I assisted student's through the
admissions process to private liberal arts colleges and something that makes their type of learning
ideal is the flexibility of their degrees. Students are given the option of even creating their own
degree, by blending different areas of

Pros And Cons Of For-Profit Universities
There are many individuals who believe, that for profit universities and colleges pose a significant
threat to American higher education, and that they should be banned, I also agree with this outlook
on for–profit universities. According to Sheffield's article, "For–profit schools enable low–income
and racial minority students, including many who are non–traditional, to gain practical, skills–based
training that better equips them for the marketplace relative to many traditional academic paths."
For–profit colleges and universities differ from non–profit colleges and universities because they
can be completed in a shorter amount of time. The training at these schools is typically focused on
only vocational skills, i.e. business and office, technical education and within the trade industry.
For–profit colleges can be seen in many different forms, there are online–schools such as the
University of Phoenix, technical schools, culinary schools, and etc. For–profit schools are profit
seeking schools, the price is high and some may say that the cost of the tuition is not always going
to the students. For–profit universities also come with big opinions for and against them. For–profit
colleges tend to be looked down upon because of the price tag that comes along with them. For–
profit universities are incredibly expensive and tuition dollars typically do not go towards the
students. These colleges survive on their marketing strategies, and approximately twenty–five

The Education Of Higher Education
The idea of Higher Education is a crucial thread in the fabric of this nation, woven through our
culture, beliefs and politics. The best of American Higher Education outstrips any others in the
world and the output of American Institutions is unparalleled. To stay competitive and expand the
current education horizon, different types of institutions, evolve and prioritize differently to ensure
the best education quality to targeted students. However, today Higher Education is facing more
challenges and critiques than at any other point in history. Indeed, when encountering the
unavoidable struggle between pleasing students and following government regulations, colleges
start to rouse from their academic wish–fulfillment fantasies and realize that the idea of Higher
Education does not swab away the realism of this materialistic world: higher education cannot
simply satisfy everyone. Three distinctive educational models, public universities, non–profit private
universities and for–profit universities, demonstrate the complex dynamic among schools,
government and students. Although the three educational models share different education
philosophy and serve multiple objectives, they all have the same purpose in the end: to help one
realize his or her own unique potential in order to manage the diversity of expectations and
challenges one would face in the society. As we know, each educational model strives to provide the
best education to its students with the resources it

For-Profit College Essay
The for–profit college and university (FPCU) is an institutional type that "'do[es]' education or
schooling but also 'behave[s]' like a business, while preparing students for occupational roles
(Hentschke, Lechuga & Tierney, 2010, p. 2). This paper will discuss history; cite changes in
curriculum, degree offerings, and institution classification; and explore current issues of financial
viability, accreditation, and fraudulent practices of the for–profit college.
History
For–profit colleges and universities began as private schools as early as "the Golden Age of Greece,
when anyone could open up a private school and teach" (Coleman & Vedder, 2008, p. 5). However,
it was during the Colonial Era that the first American for–profit schools existed. ... Show more
According to the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), one of the components of
academic freedom is "the freedom to discuss subject matter in the classroom" (Ruch, 2001, p. 128).
Nelson (2010) interprets this as a "faculty member's right to remain true to his or her pedagogical
philosophy and intellectual commitments and allows faculty members institutional latitude in
deciding how to teach the courses for which they are responsible." While the clergy and
entrepreneur faculty of the early for–profit schools possessed academic freedom through self–
management, academic freedom is somewhat constrained for faculty employed by the University of

Group Policy Paper For Profits Institutions
Group Policy Paper–For–Profits Institutions
Policy: Complete College Tennessee Act of 2010
Relevant History
Higher education attainment is one important parameter of national competitiveness in today's
increasing global world. Compare to 1990, today, the rank of U.S. in the world in four–year degree
attainment dropped from the 1st to the 12th. Therefore, President Obama set a new goal for the
United States to be first in the world again in college attainment by 2020, in order to remain global
competitive, and fulfill the needs of the growing new jobs which requires more education of the new
economy (The White House, n.d.).
President Obama and Secretary of Education Arne announced the United States Department of
Education's Race to the Top competition, a $4.35 billion incentive program designed to make drastic
reforms and improvements in education and student performance, as a part of the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. After a rigorous competition with other states, Tennessee
emerged as one of the two states awarded Race to the Top funding and will receive $501 million
over the next four years (The Public Agenda for Tennessee Higher Education 2010–2015, 2011).
For–Profit Institutions
Characteristics of For–Profit Institutions
For–profit institutions are different from traditional public and private institutions on educational
philosophy and business mission (Mmeje, Newman, Kramer II, & Peason, 2009). Traditional
universities receive funding and

For-Profit Universities Have Persuasive Jobs
Are you interested in a new career? Are you looking for specialized training and a high–paying job
in computers, fashion or health care? Earn you degree, pursue your dreams! You have talents most
students don't. Find out what else you can do. Start now! Is never too late! What are you still doing
sitting in front of the computer? Pick up the phone and call now, I did it, and you can too! Change
your life, with just one phone call.
"They tell people, 'If you don't have a college degree, you won't be able to get a job' " said Amanda
Wallace (Goodman). For–profit schools are educational institutions that are corporations and often
have shareholders. They operate as a business, and the product they sell is education. Their goal is to
provide ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Online or in class, most teachers are often not qualified to teach in their subject. Since the main
focus is recruitment a lot of the teacher tend to be barley qualified (DeFusco PBS). What drives
them? Money. Colleges such as Capella University, Brown Mackie and The University of Phoenix,
don't see students, they see customers. Because of the graduation rate of 5% (Press Release), for–
profit universities often struggle to pay back what they own to investors and to the state. Easy to
apply for loans often turn into debilitating debt for the many hopeful students that go there. Because
of this "They can't generate income needed to pay back their loans, and they're going to end up in
financial distress" (Goodman). A simple auto body refinishing and upholstering technology, a nine–
month program can cost as much as $30,000 (Goodman). With the multiple loans many take out,
combine with high interest rates, a $30,000 loan can quickly blow up. This is why is so important
for the for–profit universities to have as many new students as possible, so that they can make as
much money as they

The For-Profit Education Industry
For–profit education As with any business industry, the education industry is one big and diversified
with multiple options ranging from publicly own Universities, private nonprofit colleges to for–
profit schools. But today I am going to talk about specifically about for–profit educations. What is
for–profit education? What type of product and service do they serve and served? Who are the
biggest players and how do they affect the industry and control over price? What are the methods
used? What are the barrier to entry and exit? And last profitability. A brief history of For–profit
education. For–profit education can be traced back to the time of the founding fathers. In fact,
Benjamin Franklin was a big advocate of For–profit schools. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Regarding with any business, there are many barriers to entry to the For–profit education industry.
The first and for most barrier to entry to the For–profit colleges and universities is Money. As
reported by the Slate for–profit colleges and university need "First, raise a lot of money. Without a
pile of cash on hand, [if not] you won't be able to pay faculty and staff, or buy land, buildings, and
textbooks" (Beam). The second barrier faced by For–profit industries is licensing and accreditation.
According to the same article on the slate "...Before a college can start accepting students, it needs a
degree–granting license. Each state has its own process, but usually you need to submit your
university's curriculum to a committee for review". And get an accreditation from both regional and
national accreditation agencies. In the state of Texas agency such as the Accrediting Commission for
Community and Junior Colleges, Western Association of Schools and Colleges (ACCJC) or at the
national level you need an accreditation from Accrediting Commission of Career Schools and
Colleges (ACCSC). But at the basic level for–profit industries need to according to slate "... meets a
minimum standard for recognition by the Department of Education. Without it, a school isn't eligible
to receive federal funding nor can its students get Pell grants..." (Which grant is the main source of
revenue for the for–profit schools. Many more other more seemingly small but incremental
recognitions and requirements ranging from applying for copyright, tax exemptions, financial plans,
legal teams to applying the for the affix .edu. As to the exit, there is no such barrier as my research
conferred. As recently have seen on the TV, close your doors to a student as we have seen on TV
witnessed done by the ITT Technical Institute School which is one of the For–profit College.
Leaving as many as 40,000 students in

The Education Of Higher Education
Institutions of higher learning compete amongst each other, enabling them to focus on subjects that
do not pertain to education. The education system has become more of a business organization,
making learning their second priority and further shifting their focus from the quality of education
and students to the quantity of students and the popularity of their institution. The economy of the
country has also had a big impact on shaping universities operating systems. American modern
economy is based on knowledge, thus there is an increasing high demand for higher education.
Higher education has become a market system, and universities have to change their traditional
structure in order to become a valuable competitor; although education is in demand, the supply of
quality in education is decreasing. Competition among traditional universities and the increase of
for–profit schools have diminished the value of higher education. Educational instiutions are
evolving into businesses and primarily focusing on the profit aspect.Education is a very valuable
business, it creates a lot of free cash flow and there is a high rate of educational needs that continue
to grow. In the essay"The Sandbox Experiment" , by Peter Sacks, the author makes an argument that
professors are placed in situations where they are forced to moderate their course material in order
to please their students(Sacks 1–2). Sacks conducts the "Sandbox experiment" which demonstrated
how professors change their

For-Profit Colleges Essay
There are several characteristics of for–profit colleges that make them vastly different from two–
year community colleges or four–year state or private universities. The first major difference is that
for–profit colleges are run more like a corporation than traditional colleges. This allows them to hire
professors on short–term contracts, without requiring them to gain tenure. This practice is beneficial
to for–profit colleges because if the professor's statistics are horrible, he or she could be let go of
sooner without having to go through a review board process, the college could simply not renew
their contract. Another difference from tradition colleges is that classes can start at for–profit schools
more often and classes can continue all–year. This is due to the fact that most of the student body at
for–profits schools are online students who may be located thousands of miles away from the base
campus. Another major difference of for–profit colleges is that new courses can be ... Show more
This means that in order to have a decent job, you usually need some type of degree or training
beyond a high school education. Unfortunately, in years to come, this trend toward for–profit
colleges could devastate our nation's economy. The student loan debt in the US is roughly equal to
the amount of US credit card debt, they is a frightening fact because for–profit student are more
likely to default on their loans (they make up 44% of all student debt defaults), which could burst
our student debt bubble. This would have devastating consequences for our government, tax payers,
and possibly even the global economy. If our student debt bubble were to burst, like the housing
bubble back in 2007–2009, it would have the potential to plunge us into another Great Depression.
That, is

Essay On College Stakeholders
The key stakeholders of education include traditional four year non–profit universities/colleges and
for–profit colleges, state and federal government funding agencies, students and parents, and
employers of students who graduate college. The main alignment between non–profit
universities/colleges and for–profit colleges revolve around their desire for an increase in student
quality, increase in faculty quality, increase in student population, increase in prestige, and thus
consequently an increase in revenues. All types of colleges are trying to increase their endowment
by raising tuition charges, admitting more students, hosting fundraisers, and asking for donation
from their alumni. The main policy that colleges use to increase their endowment ... Show more
The companies give loans to students because of the high cost of tuition and in doing so, they also
charge a high interest rate. Students are then stuck in a difficult situation because they can either
deny the loan, thus denying their college education, or they can take the high interest loan, and be
burdened in debt, and receive their college education. Most students usually decide to take the loan
because of the policy of employers. Employers of students who graduate college align with non–
profit colleges, for–profit colleges, and government funding agencies with the idea of having a
higher number of students attending colleges. These employers want to hire people who are highly
skilled in their respective fields and want people who can apply their skills well in a corporate
setting. These employer institute policies such as requiring a minimum degree to apply for a job
position and offering internships to only college students, making it almost impossible for people
who have not attended college to obtain these

Western International University Is A Small, For Profit...
School Profile: Western International University
Western International University is a small, for–profit college. Only around 3,000 students enroll
every year in this private school. Western International University was only recently founded in
Phoenix, Arizona in the late 1970s. This college offers over 160 specialized associate's, bachelor's
and master 's degrees. Western International University maintains a continuous curriculum system
that allows incoming students to choose from 16 basic majors like business, accounting,
management, psychology and computer science. Western International University is focused on
helping working adults achieve professional certifications and degrees, so they keep up with
changing technologies, student expectations and education trends. The school may be small, but
they prioritize culturally diversity and student community.
Even though Western International University is a distance education school, they offer students
opportunities through their partnership with the online company Internships. Because Western
International University focuses on working adults, they offer plenty of career and alumni resources.
For example, the Career Resource program helps students explore, search and obtain employment.
They offer help with goal–setting, interviewing, networking and professional development. The
university regularly posts free online career development webinars and hosts live events about
current industry and career trends. The West

For-Profit Universities As A Social Problems
For–profit universities are recently being recognized as a social problem. A for–profit university is
defined as a school that is owned and operated by private corporations, whose top priority is to make
money (IPFW). These schools often only offer two–year associate degrees and certificate programs,
but they rarely offer general education and liberal arts programs. This means the students cannot
advance to a higher degree.
Also, for–profit lack accreditation, so most credits from an accredited college will not transfer,
limiting the ability to advance in school. These for–profit universities have exorbitant tuition costs.
Average tuition after grants at a for–profit school is about $31,000, compared to non–profit tuition
of $26,000. Another issue is that many for–profit schools have a low graduation rate. For example,
University of Phoenix had a 17.5 percent graduation rate in 2014, whereas Keiser University, a non–
profit school, had a 56 percent graduation rate in 2014 (College Scorecard). Therefore, proving that
for–profit universities fit the definition of a social problem, which is a social condition that has
negative consequences for individuals, our social world or the physical world.
Even if they do earn a degree, most do not find employment. A study from the National Bureau of
Economic Research shows applicants who had earned a bachelor's degree in business from a large
online for–profit university are about 22 percent less likely to get a call back from employers

Debt Free College Education
Although the present role of higher education is contested, its origins aren't. Higher education in the
US was created as a way to maintain class distinctions. The old Puritan model of the American
university was a religious haven for students of wealthy families who attended in order to become
clergymen. Graduates would then move on to becoming leaders in other branches of the church,
thereby leading their own communities and essentially generating essentially an upper class of
ministers. Though the religious presence at these institutions has largely diminished, the
overwhelming presence of students of primarily wealthy backgrounds remains as non–profit
colleges still consist of, on average, 70% students of middle–income and above (DOE, ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
State funded schools would see an increase in applications as well as enrollment of students that
would have taken out debt. Consequently, there would be a more competitive admissions landscape
for public colleges and for–profit schools would see a decline in enrollment as it is seen as a
cheaper, but much more risky option to two–year public colleges and the proposal would make a
superior option more affordable. It's unclear as to whether the proposal would lead to an increase in
available space at universities as creation of additional space at public universities would require
additional funding from the state governments, which, historically, has been declining. If additional
funding is allowed and public school capacity is expanded, for–profit schools would see a massive
decline in enrollment. In both cases, four–year non–profit universities would experience little to no
effect because the demographics within the four–year non–profit institutions, which typically have
the highest average tuition rates, are even more skewed towards the students of wealthier
backgrounds. The college student market is structured in that the students whose families can pay
sticker price or can afford college on little debt generally attend four–year nonprofit private schools.
In the middle market, the students

The United States Education System
The United States have long been held in high esteem by their peers for their higher education
system's ability to produce the best and brightest young adults that can impact the world. Students in
our nation have a choice whether or not to attend prestigious higher–level institutions in order to
educate themselves and prepare themselves for the job market. The U.S. has an outstanding
reputation of educating students as well as making education available to everyone in the country.
Whether it be a public university, private university or a for–profit institution, people can easily find
a way to pursue their academic goals. However, many students graduate college with the inability to
find a job because they weren 't properly trained and with massive debt due to the extremely high
price of tuition at most universities. College is viewed as a necessity, but is priced as a luxury. This
is leading to a drastic downturn to the success of the United States education system. Changes have
to be made in regard to how universities are funded as well as universities reevaluating where their
responsibilities truly lie–either making a profit or preparing students for the workforce in order to
ensure the growth and posterity of the United States. There are many different types of higher
education institutions and reasons to attend them. One of them is nonprofit private universities.
Nonprofit private universities are extremely attractive because of their prestige and reputation.
Students

Why College Athletes Should Be Paid
Why College Athletes Should Be Paid, and How The NCAA Can Do That The NCAA and the
universities represented by it are now making more money than ever through their athletic programs
than ever before. However, due to amateurism regulations set by the NCAA, the college athletes that
generate the massive revenue the NCAA receives are not paid at all. The article opens with the
argument that college athletes should be paid for their play. The argument is supported through
information proving that the NCAA undervalues athletes through the money they generate for their
school versus the amount of scholarship money the school provides them with. The article also
discusses how the NCAA also prevents athletes from marketing their own image and ... Show more
In fact, collegiate athletes are not permitted to use their own image for personal profit, as it violates
the NCAA's rules on amateurism. Paying college athletes has been debated and argued about for
years, with tensions increasing on both sides. However, one idea remains clear. The NCAA needs to
compensate college athletes, and can do so through salaries, compensation for games played, or
through endorsement deals. The NCAA is one of the largest sports organizations in the world,
representing college athletics through three divisions and over twenty different sports. It is a multi
billion dollar business that brings in revenue through ticket sales, television contracts, and sale of
memorabilia. However, with none of the profits going towards the athletes themselves, the NCAA is
using their students for personal gain within the organization. There are multiple ways the NCAA
profits off its athletes, by undervaluing players and giving them less compensation because of it, as
well as limiting their opportunities to make money on their own. Critics of compensating college
athletes claim that the scholarships the players receive is enough compensation for their play, as well
as earning an education. John Thelin of Time Magazine states that since scholarships are not taxed,
it becomes a better deal for athletes. He says an athlete with a $65,000 scholarship would be more
financially

College Football: An Economic Analysis
Because of the popularity of the sport, colleges and universities and occasionally local communities
have been investing an enormous money in infrastructure for their teams. According the star–
telegram site, "Nowhere is that more prevalent than in big–time college football, where 38 schools
spent more than $20 million on their programs last year. Alabama led with more than $41 million in
expenses, according to information obtained from the Department of Education. Auburn was second
with $36 million. TCU spent more than $31 million, the fifth–most in the country. "Like the major
professional sports leagues in America, colleges and universities have upgraded their facilities over
the past 13 years adding to both the number and quality of seats. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
However, does college football always give good effect to the Colleges and Universities? In 2011,
Jordan Weissman posted on the Atlantic site a report about the bad effect of economic on the
college. According the report, we can easily see lot of team get benefits from economic. However,
those teams are only one part of much larger and more complicated picture. The report pointed out
that "in August, the NCAA released a financial breakdown of college athletics programs from 2004
through 2010. In those years, hardly more than half of the roughly 120 teams in the Football Bowl
Subdivision, the old Division 1–A, generated a profit from football. Those teams netted a median
gain of $9.1 million. Among the programs stuck in the red, their median loss was $2.9 million. So
for elite football schools, the game is a cash cow capable of subsidizing less remunerative sports.
For the gridiron also–rans, it's just one more expense." Moreover, spending more money doesn't
guarantee better return. "Before his days in the White House, former Office of Management and
Budget Peter Orszag was part of a team commissioned by the NCAA to analyze the impact of
athletic spending on colleges. Looking at data from 1993 to 2001, his study found that spending
more on football didn't lead to a more profitable team. It also didn't lead to additional alumni
giving." Secondly, because the celebrity and wealthy of that sport, lot of teenager want to be football
player more than other fields. In 2014, Cardale Jones, a quarterback at Ohio State football team,
posted a message on Twitter: "Why should we have to go to class if we came here to play
FOOTBALL, we aren't come to play SCHOOL, classes are POINTLESS." Consequence, after 4
years playing without preparing for the worst situation. Majority of college football players who
couldn't go to NFL teams will become free agents and have to

Non-Profit College Tuition

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Nicole Gomez

More from Nicole Gomez (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Non-Profit College Tuition