1. MEMORANDUM
TO: Clients and Entrepreneurs
FROM: Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP
RE: Patents – When, Why & How
DATE: 2011
___________________________________________________________________
This Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) memo addresses typical questions from companies regarding
patents and intellectual property (IP). This document is authored by the Intellectual Property Group of
Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP (www.mmmlaw.com). The following questions are commonly asked
by technology and business services companies. We hope this information is helpful to you. Please
note that there are additional questions that will be relevant in this area and you should consult an IP
attorney at MMM (contact information listed at the end of this memorandum) with any other questions.
1. Why should I consider filing a patent application?
Answer: There are several reasons that filing one or more patent applications could be important. A
few of the common reasons are listed below:
a. Protection against competitors – Having an issued patent (or patents) grants the
patent holder the right to stop others from making, using, or selling the patented invention. Thus,
if you believe you have a successful product, a patent may be the only way to prevent potential
competitors from copying that technology and marketing it themselves.
b. Adding value to your company – For many early-stage companies, patents (and
pending patent applications) are a way to boost valuations and make a company more attractive
to a potential investor. In fact, many investors and acquirers often comment that patent
protection is a key component to a successful valuation. Further, pending patent applications can
be just as important (if not more so) than issued patents, as a pending application carries with it
the possibility of obtaining broad patent coverage.
c. Discrete assets – Patents and patent applications are properties that can be bought,
sold, and licensed like any other asset. Accordingly, patents can be used to generate revenue
through licensing, or put a “wrapper” around a technology in an agreement.
2. When should I begin thinking about patent protection?
Answer: Generally, you should begin considering patent protection once product design or
development begins in earnest. There is no requirement that a technology actually be “built” before
applying for patent protection (as long as the applicant can define with particularity how the
technology will function), and thus you do not have to wait until after a technology is complete to
begin preparing a patent application. Further, as described below, waiting too long to apply for patent
protection can bar you from obtaining a patent. Additionally, there are ways to file a patent
application relatively quickly and cheaply (see discussion of provisional patent applications below) to
provide temporary protection while product development, marketing, and the like are finished.

2. Memorandum - Patent FAQs
2011
Page 2
3. What is the difference between a “provisional” and a “non-provisional” (regular) patent
application?
Answer: There are two primary types of U.S. patent applications—provisional applications and non-
provisional (or regular) patent applications. The critical distinctions between the two are described
below:
a. Provisional Application – A provisional patent application is a temporary application
that acts as a placeholder and grants its applicant(s) a priority filing date for one (1) year. If a regular,
non-provisional application is filed within one year of the provisional application, then the applicant(s)
can claim priority back to the filing date of the provisional application. If no non-provisional
application is filed, then the provisional simply “expires” one year after its filing.
Provisional applications are advantageous in that they do not have to meet the strict, formal
requirements of a non-provisional application, and thus can typically be prepared more quickly and
cheaply than non-provisional applications. Also, because there are no formal formatting requirements
for provisional applications, and because they are not required to recite specific “claims” (i.e., the
legal language that defines the scope of an invention), provisional applications can consist entirely of
inventor-supplied materials, such as technical specifications, white papers, internal diagrams and
screen shots, and the like.
There are downsides to provisional applications, however. Mainly, a provisional application is
only as good as the content contained therein. Thus, a short “cover sheet” or “abstract” provisional
with limited technical substance that only sets forth a high-level concept or idea will likely not be
deemed sufficient to support a filing date for a later, non-provisional application.
b. Non-Provisional Application – A non-provisional application is a regular application that
is examined by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) and must meet all formal requirements
of a patent application. A non-provisional patent application includes drawings that show, in detail, a
given invention, a detailed description of the invention, and claims that set forth the legal scope of the
invention. Non-provisional applications require careful planning, consideration, and drafting to be of
sufficient scope, clarity, and content to adequately and accurately describe an underlying technology.
4. What is the timetable for preparing a patent application?
Answer: The time it takes to prepare a patent application depends on a variety of factors, including
the complexity of the underlying technology, the scope of patent protection desired, whether any
potential deadlines are on the horizon (e.g., timing with product release), etc. Generally, preparing a
high-quality, non-provisional patent application requires about three (3) months, but this time can be
(and often is) shortened due to timing and budgetary constraints. Quality non-provisional patent
applications can be prepared in less than a month in certain circumstances, but this approach is not
recommended.
On the other hand, provisional patent applications can be prepared in much shorter amounts
of time, especially if they consist entirely or almost entirely of inventor-supplied materials. Provisional
applications consisting of majority inventor-supplied materials can often be filed within a few days.
5. What is the approximate cost for preparing a patent application?
Answer: The cost for preparing a patent application can vary greatly depending on many factors,
including the type of application (provisional versus non-provisional), the complexity of the underlying
technology, the importance of the technology to the company, timing and budgetary constraints, and
other factors. Some provisional applications can be filed for as cheaply as $500, whereas some very
high quality and complex families of non-provisional applications can cost upwards of $300,000.

3. Memorandum - Patent FAQs
2011
Page 3
As a general rule of thumb, a provisional application with limited attorney-supplied content
costs approximately $1,000 - $2,000. For non-provisional applications, the typical cost is
approximately $15,000 per inventive concept. Keep in mind, however, that these estimates are just
that, estimates, and a patent application can be crafted to fit any situation and budget.
6. I am preparing to launch a new product very soon—do I need to file a patent
application before I do so?
Answer: Not necessarily, but there are certain actions that can make it time-critical to file a patent
application. Specifically, a patent application must be filed within one (1) year of any public use,
public disclosure, or offer for sale (even private) of a given technology, or else the right to obtain a
U.S. patent for that technology is lost. This is known as a “statutory bar.” Thus, any of these
activities (including a new product launch) begins a one-year time period during which a patent
application must be filed. It is also important to note that many foreign countries do not afford patent
applicants with this one-year grace period. Thus, for example, a public disclosure of a given
technology (e.g., a white paper or doctoral thesis) may bar patent protection in many countries if a
patent application is not filed in those countries prior to that public disclosure.
7. Will a U.S. patent provide protection in foreign countries?
Answer: Unfortunately, no. Every country has its own patent system with specific laws and rules
regarding examination and issuance of patents. Thus, if you plan to conduct business in any foreign
countries, you must file for patent protection in each individual country (with some limited exceptions,
such as the EU).
A patent applicant may file, however, an international “PCT” (Patent Cooperation Treaty)
application within one year of filing a first patent application (e.g., a U.S. provisional application),
which provides a temporary priority date to file later foreign patent applications. Typically, a PCT
application provides thirty (30) months for an applicant to decide whether he or she wishes to pursue
patent protection in any foreign countries. If so, the applicant can file in those countries and claim
priority back to the filing date of the first filed patent application. If no foreign patent applications are
filed, the PCT application merely “expires.”
8. How do I know if my technology is patentable?
Answer: Whether a given technology is patentable or not depends on a variety of factors, but the
most important issues to consider are (i) whether the technology comprises patent-eligible subject
matter, and (ii) whether any “prior art” exists that teaches, suggests, or discloses the technology.
Regarding the patent-eligible subject matter issue, most technologies are patent-eligible, but this
question often arises in the software and business method contexts. This question is still somewhat
unanswered, but for now most experts are taking the position that software technologies will
ultimately prove to be patentable, and most companies in the field cannot afford to gamble that all
software patents will ultimately be held invalid. The scope of this patent-eligibility question is beyond
the scope of this memorandum, but please contact an IP attorney at MMM for further information.
Regarding the “prior art” issue, conducting a patent search is one way to begin to understand
the relevant prior art that may exist in your field. A search is never guaranteed to identify any and all
relevant prior art, but it does help in identifying whether your technology area is a “crowded field,” and
also provides a sampling of what patents in your space “look like.”
9. Whose name should appear on a patent application (i.e., who is an “inventor”)?
Answer: U.S. patent applications require that individual inventors be named on a patent application.
An “inventor” is one that contributed to “conception” and “reduction to practice” of the claimed subject
matter in the application. Of these two criteria, conception is generally considered to be the most
significant. For example, a pure “bench engineer” or programmer not involved in the design of a

4. Memorandum - Patent FAQs
2011
Page 4
technology is likely not an inventor, whereas one who develops the architecture or design of a
technology but does not necessarily contribute to actual construction or programming of the system
might be an inventor.
It is important to note that, absent an agreement to the contrary, patent rights of an employee
do not automatically assign to the employer. This is true even if a “work for hire” agreement with an
employee is in place. Accordingly, it is very important to obtain patent assignments from all inventors
named on a patent application.
10. What happens after I file a patent application?
Answer: After a patent application is filed, it is initially examined by the USPTO to ensure that all
formatting and technical requirements have been met, and if so, it is passed along for examination by
a patent examiner. Unfortunately, due to USPTO backlog, it can often be more than a year (or two)
before a patent application is examined. Once examination begins, an applicant is often required to
narrow the scope of his or her patent “claims” and argue with the USPTO regarding why a patent is
deserved. After this negotiation process is complete, if the examiner deems the subject matter is
worthy of patent protection, then a patent is issued. If the examiner believes the subject matter is not
worthy of patent protection, then it is ultimately rejected. If this happens, and a patent applicant still
wishes to pursue patent protection, then he or she can appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and
Interferences. Please see MMM’s Patent Law Overview memorandum, or contact an MMM IP
attorney for more information.
11. Is there a quick and easy way to apply for patent protection?
Answer: Yes, as described above, provisional patent applications can be prepared and filed
relatively easily, quickly, and cheaply in some limited circumstances. However, it is important to note
that these provisional applications only provide temporary protection, and they must include sufficient
content to support a later-filed non-provisional application to have any significant value.
12. What alternatives do I have to obtaining a patent to protect my technology?
Answer: In some cases, patent protection may not be possible (e.g., it has been more than a year
since an offer for sale of a technology), and thus you may want to consider alternate forms of
protection. The type(s) of alternate protection best suited for you may depend on the subject matter
of the technology, but for software and other computer-implemented technologies, the following forms
are most typical:
a. Copyright – Protects “original works of authorship.” In the software context, source code
is protectable via copyright. Registering copyrights is not required to obtain protection, but is
necessary to file a lawsuit.
b. Trade Secret – A trade secret is a process, technology, formula, etc. that is not generally
known or readily ascertainable. Trade secrets are advantageous in situations in which you are
relatively confident that your technology cannot be easily “reverse engineered.” To maintain a
trade secret, certain procedures and protocols must be implemented to show efforts keep the
technology or subject matter a secret.
*****
For more information regarding any of the above-listed questions, or any others relating to patents or
intellectual property, please contact one of the following attorneys in the MMM IP Group:
John R. Harris - 404-504-7720 - jharris@mmmlaw.com
Daniel E. Sineway - 404-364-7421 - dsineway@mmmlaw.com