People’S Beliefs On How Individuals Become Leaders Affect

People’S Beliefs On How Individuals Become Leaders Affect
People's beliefs on how individuals become leaders affect the way they evaluate leadership
potentials. If people believe that leaders are born, it is likely to result in selecting or identifying the
right people for leadership positions rather than developing the leaders. Leadership refers to the
exercise of influence over others on behalf of a specific purpose, goals, and aims of the leaders.
Some leadership theories such as Trait theory and Great Man theory believe that individuals inherit
some traits and qualities that make them suited for leadership (Lussier & Achua, 2015). However
Gentry, Deal, Stawiski & Ruderman (2012) believes that a good leader is developed through
constant growth, mentoring, experience, and learning. Such leaders ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Additionally, leaders need to be smart to evaluate situations and come up with courses of action.
This makes social intelligence an important leadership trait. An aspect of empathy and ability to
understand followers is important to leaders. These traits are believed to be natural within an
individual.
However, differentiating between leadership emergence and effectiveness is important in
understanding the issue of inborn leadership traits (Gentry, Deal, Stawiski & Ruderman, 2012).
Leadership effectiveness refers to the performance of the leader while emergence refers to being
valved into a leadership role. In many cases, inborn leadership traits are associated with the
emergence of leadership. Meaning that within a group of peers, those who are more intelligent or are
more extraverted tend to have a better influence on a group. However, this does not mean that these
individuals perform better than others when placed in a formal leadership position.
Most studies investigating the relationship between leadership and extraversion have found a weak
relationship, making it difficult to draw conclusions from such positions. However, some studies
have indicated a strong relationship when looking at specific job types. In this case, extraversion
predicts that performance in jobs with the competitive social element such as sales. On the other
hand, extraversion would predict other less desirable outcomes such as absenteeism. Further, when
investigating the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Are Leaders Born Or Made
Identify and Share Your Leadership Story
Christina Faulk
Northcentral University
November 19, 2017 Abstract
This paper adds insight to whether leaders are born or made. In this paper you will find my beliefs
on this topic, as well as my personal leadership story. The meaning of leadership is varied based on
individual viewpoints and experiences. Many characteristics of a leader can be said to be based on
behavior, influence and one's interpersonal skills (Yukl, 2006).
Are Leaders Born or Made?
"Leadership is both a research area and a practical skill encompassing the ability of an individual or
organization to "lead" or guide other individuals, teams, or entire organizations" ("Leadership",
n.d.). Survey ten (10) people on their definition of a great leader and you will most likely receive ten
(10) different definitions. How leaders come about can be argued several different ways. 361 C–
level executives (those at the top of organizations) were asked whether they thought leaders were
born or made. While 28.5% believed that they are both born and made, 19.1% believed they are
born, and 52.4% believed they are made (Gentry, Deal, and Stawiski, 2016).
Leaders are Born
One may be able to argue that a leader can only be born. Born leaders have the charisma which
cannot be taught or learned. They are natural inspirers, and can often be given a task and can
develop a team around it. Born leaders can take this team and have everyone on board and believing
in

Are Leaders Made or Born: a Critique of Great Manand Trait...
ARE LEADERS BORN OR MADE:
A critique of Great Man and Trait theories.
Assignment prepared by Philip Barry 387169
August 08
Introduction
Leadership continues to be one of the most debated and studied topics in management and indeed
society as a whole. This can be evidenced by the fact that if you search for leadership on Goggle
175,000,000 worldwide hits are recorded. Success in many arenas, whether it be business, the
military, politics or the wider community is often primarily attributed to good leadership. Equally,
organisational failure or under–performance is just as readily attributed to poor leadership.
Leadership has been the subject of intense interest and debate for over two and a half millennia,
from Plato ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Thirdly the two schools of thought dismiss the leader follower relationship, portraying a very one
way relationship where followers have little to no impact on leaders. While such a model may have
some relevance in a highly centralised command and control organisation in the public and
voluntary sector (The NHS in particular) as well as LEAN organisations such as Toyota the leader
follower relationship is much more complicated.
Most importantly, however "Great Man" and Trait theorists ignore the situation and context that the
leader is operating in. As Stoghill 1948 argues it is difficult to isolate a set of traits and
characteristics of leaders without factoring in the situational effects.
Importantly too, much of the research on traits is not directed at understanding the impact leaders
have on outcomes or on those they lead. Hence while the research looks at traits that may be
important in leader emergence the research tends not to explore the relationship between leadership
traits and employee productivity or employee satisfaction.
A significant criticism of the schools is that they romanticize the great leader presenting both a one
sided portrayal of leadership as well as often conveniently glossing over their failings of

Leaders , Are They Born or Made?
Q 3. Organizational success depends ultimately on the qualities of its leaders. But are leaders born
successful or can they be trained? Use theories and evidences to support your discussion.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Leadership is the competency and capability to influence and motivate people towards the fulfilment
of goals .Thereby, leadership within any organization, is most definitely a critical factor of
organizational efficacy.
Leaders also embody a vision for future, and a good leader possesses the quality to cope and evolve
with change.
The need of a leader in any given organizational setup, is imperative to the growth and future of the
organization. "Leadership is the ability of an individual to influence, motivate, and enable ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
|
| The crux of the model states that low and high LPC leaders are each effective if |
|placed in the right situation. |
2.3.2 Hersey and Blanchard's Model
This model of leadership requires the leader to identify the demands of the situation and then choose
and implement the appropriate leadership response. The theory also lays emphasis on the readiness
of the followers and their reaction to a specific task.
It also asserts that an effective leader assess the changing situations , and guages the readiness of the
followers to the same and implements necessary changes in the pattern of leadership , in order to
accommodate the change.
Fig 2.2
[pic]
Source: Killian
The above diagram illustrates the different patterns of leadership behaviour
Table 2.4 –Interpretation

S1– telling style– gives specific directions and closely supervises the followers.
S2–selling style– explains decisions and provides opportunity to clarify
S3–participating style– shares ideas openly and involve sin decision making.
S4–delegating style– provides little in terms of direction and support for

Leadership As A Theory Of Leadership
Literature Review
The first research on leadership in 1910 gave rise to the notion those there certain individuals that
have traits that they are born with that make them great leaders. That is natural born leaders as other
are not born with such traits, however; much research followed to verify the 1910 conclusion. Max
Weber identified charismatic leadership as a theory on leadership that was new and emerging, As per
Max, charisma is a personal magnetism or charge in the sense that leaders are those that can attract
others to them. While other concluded that leaders are not born, they are made (Malphurs, 2003).
Leaders are made where a lot of effort and hard work is put, and this is the price of leadership, in
other words, leaders are ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is about speaking softly but carrying a big stick and it is obvious that what you cannot separate are
leadership and learning. It is about learning to the condition in the sense that one can reveal a
glorious and power inner self. Many people hold the truth that leaders are born to lead, and this is a
notion made by a mysterious confluence of events or both de (Vries & Engellau, 2004).
Personal view of the literature
Research conclusively indicates that effective leadership is much more on specific principles that get
easily followed by anyone and leaders that are effective depend less and less on an innate trait. Such
research has prompted a lot of excitement in the sense that people can easily share the views of their
purpose. However, there are many with their opinion on the matter (Gardner & Laskin, 2011).
In history, we have seen the great leader, and one of them is General Hoyts. He and Vanderberg were
one of the most dominant military commanders. He becomes the U.S Air force's second chief of
staff. General Vandenberg was not a natural leader this is per Commandant Cadets at West Point. In
fact, there was one time he almost being dismissed from the Academy for his lack of leadership
ability during his first year at the academy. However, he got counseling, and he took note and by the
time he completed his training and graduated he was a very competent

Leadership As A Leader And Gaining Leadership Qualities
As a result of living in a society that puts a great deal of importance on becoming a leader and
gaining leadership qualities, work places and organisations have now resulted in investing large
sums in sponsoring employees take part in leadership programs and training courses. The term
leadership is broad and open to interpretation. Peters and Waterman (1982, P. 79) define leadership
as "meticulously shifting the attention of the institutions through the mundane language of
management systems. It is altering agendas so that new agendas get attention. It is being visible
when things go awry and invisible when they are working well. It is building a loyal team that
speaks more or less with one voice. It's listening carefully most of the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
There are many theories that contribute to the discussion of leadership some of which are: Trait,
Behavioural, Contingency, Relational theory and the Style theory. The contingency theory claims
that there is no set way to lead an organisation. This is due to the fact that both external and internal
factors need to be considered by the leader and need to be handled accordingly. The Relational
theory looks into how relations within an organisation develop leaders and at how leaders are
required to be accustomed to others within the organisation. The Style theory of leadership proposes
that they style of leadership is the key to good leadership. It looks at leaders and their style of
leadership for example Steve Jobs would lead in a very autocratic manner whereas Richard Branson
is seen to be a democratic leader. The managerial grid is also part of the style based theory; it allows
people to embrace a leadership style that is both people friendly and achieve target production.
However this theory has been criticised of being too simplistic as different people would prefer to be
lead in different ways. Having said this there are two main theories that have become the result of
this debate: behavioural and trait. The trait theory believes that people are born with leadership
characteristics such as imagination, determination and enthusiasm. The analysis of mental, physical
and social attributes of leaders resulted in the trait theory being developed. Whereas the behavioural

Characteristics Of A Great Leader
To be a great leader one must have many attributes or qualities. Some of the most important are
flexibility, communication, courage, humility, and responsibility. A great leader must be flexible as
being a leader usually consists of dealing with new challenges all the time, especially in the
technological age. Communication consists of effectively conveying expectations and understanding
how people will interpret the leader's directions. A great leader must have the courage to see the path
that the group must take to complete the goal regardless of the consequences. When a great leader
does not correctly handle a situation he or she must have the humility to admit that he or she was
wrong. Also, this leader must be responsible for the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Part of the reason that the idea of great leaders being born is appealing is that a great leader is so
hard to define. It can be discussed what great leaders do and how they act. Sometimes all we are
good at though is identifying who a great leader is outside of ourselves. It is difficult to answer the
question "Why aren't you a great leader?". The initial reaction would most commonly be that you
just aren't. It seems that you weren't meant to be. With that the idea that great leaders are born to be
that way seems appealing. If we look at history many great leaders came seemingly out of nowhere.
George Washington and Abraham Lincoln did not need to attend leadership seminars to lead the
nation. With all that is done for leadership nowadays and the mixed results, it seems that there is
something intrinsic that great leaders have. Many companies focus their efforts on trying to develop
leaders from within the company to fill critical roles. Many times though there is a leadership talent
gap from where the company would like the given leader to be and where he or she actually is. A lot
of what is attributed to a leader begin great is luck. To be truly great the leader usually is presented
with a monumental opportunity to lead in the face of adversity. The leader is lucky to have come
upon this situation and be given the chance to rise to the occasion. By capitalizing on this lucky
situation the

Why Is It Important To Say That Leaders Are Born Not Made
"Leaders are Born, Not Made" Discuss.
Introduction
Whether leaders are born and not made is a discussion that has been debated for centuries and yet it
still divides opinion today. Like many, on receiving this assignment my instinctive gut response was
that they are! However, over the course of my exploration into the subject matter and in greater
reflection of my own personal experiences, my contention is now similar to that of the famous and
successful American football coach Vince Lombardi who said "Leaders are not born, they're made.
They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is
worthwhile"
This sentiment will form the basis of my argument and my position on the topic. ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
They just seemed to have the 'leadership' x factor within them. They were the leaders we all grew up
with, and at an age that was impossible for them to have received any formalised training or
development.
Another angle to discuss is personality and the very plausible belief that we are born predisposed to
certain personality traits. If this holds true then surely certain personality types are better suited to
positions of leadership. Therefore. an introvert is unlikely to feel comfortable leading, commanding
and being followed, nor are they likely to possess the necessary communication and influencing
skills required to garner support and followers.
A person born with a lack of confidence is also unlikely to ever seek out leadership or be
comfortable if it is thrust upon them. Desire, another personality trait, in my opinion is also a very
important quality in that it essential prerequisite trait that must be possessed by those that go on to
become great leaders. Those that do not have the necessary desire to succeed – rarely do.
Leaders are Made – The evidence
The root of my position stems from another debate. A discussion which, in many ways, runs in
parallel with this one – the discussion of 'nature vs. nurture', on this topic I passionately sit on the
side of 'nurture' and therefore would feel somewhat hypocritical if I were to advocate the notion that
'leaders are born!'

My support of 'nurture' is based on personal circumstances. I am

What Makes A Great Leader?
What exactly makes a great leader? Do certain personality traits make people better–suited to
leadership roles, or do characteristics of the situation make it more likely that certain people will
take charge? When we look at the leaders around us, be it our current boss or the President, we
might find ourselves wondering exactly why these individuals excel in such positions. People have
long been interested in leadership throughout human history, but it has only been relatively recent
that a number of formal leadership theories have emerged. Interest in leadership increased during the
early part of the twentieth century. Early leadership theories focused on what qualities distinguished
between leaders and followers, while subsequent ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Have you ever heard a leader described as "born to lead?" According to this point of view (Great
Man Theory), great leaders are "simply born with the necessary internal characteristics such as
charisma, confidence, intelligence, and social skills that make them natural born leaders." Have you
ever heard that leaders are made, not born? Consider this the flip side of the Great Man Theory
(Behavioral Theory). This leadership theory focuses on "the actions of leaders not on mental
qualities or internal states, people can learn to become leaders through teaching and observation."
We have learned that the brain 's neo–cortex, which governs analytical and technical ability, grasps
concepts quickly, while utilizing an expanding network of association and comprehension. It
operates with magnificent efficiency and supports the Great Man Theory. We have learned that the
brain 's limbic system manages our feelings, impulses, and drives. The limbic system is a much
slower learner and is accomplished through lots of repetition and practice, motivation, and feedback.
It operates at a slower, more cautious pace and supports the Behaviorial Theory. The Great Man
Theory of leadership states that some people are born with the necessary attributes that set them
apart from others and that these traits are responsible for their assuming positions of power and
authority. A leader is a hero who accomplishes goals against all odds for his followers. The theory
implies that

Trenton Leadership Style Analysis
Leadership
Review of Subject
Leadership has a variety of meanings to different individuals, often based upon the circumstance and
situation which defines the term leader or leadership. Northouse (2016) defines leadership as, "a
process by which an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal." (p. 6).
Sammi Caramella writes, "Leadership is critical to every company. Workers need someone to look
to, learn from and thrive with. Every leader has their own style and strategy. Further, leadership
styles and methods vary because of outside influences and personal challenges. While leadership is
unique to everyone, there are some common ways to define the term." (2017). According to Peter
Economy (2018), also known as "The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I was not sure I could handle the position, but I had a Chief Petty Officer who took me under his
wing and began a rigorous on the job training program as the ship was deploying to the
Mediterranean within a matter of weeks. I learned years later the Chief was using a variety of
leadership techniques to help with my progression as a leader. He began with a skills approach and
later moved to more of a situational approach to help me learn my new role.
A skills approach takes a leader centered perspective on leadership with more emphasis on the skills
and abilities that an individual can learn. Using Katz's 1955 model, the three–skill approach
suggests that effective leadership depends on three essential personal skills: technical, human, and
conceptual. The technical skill is knowledge and skill in a type of work or activity while the human
skill is the ability and knowledge around working with people. Human skills involve people,
technical involve working with things, and conceptual skills involve working with ideas (Northouse,

The Theory Of Leadership Development
Introduction In this paper, the writer will discuss the concept of leadership development, whether a
person is born or developed to be a leader, what role mentoring has on follower's, and what being a
leader and follower mean. The writer will relate personal experience as well as scholarly research to
validate her perception of leadership development. The writer will provide enough information for
the reader to have a good understanding of leadership development, mentoring followers, and what
he or she believes is a leader and/or follower.
Is a Leader Born or Developed? One must be able to understand the definition of leadership before
making the determination is a leader is born or developed. Leadership is defined as "the process of
influencing an organized group toward accomplishing its goals" (Bethel University, 2011, p.16).
There are myths that tend to stand in the way of people fully understanding leadership development.
One would say that good leadership is having common sense, or leaders are born rather than made
or developed. Leaders have certain traits that make he or she be a good leader. One may assume that
a person is born a leader because of one's actions or attributes he or she maintains. A person can
have traits and behaviors that point in the direction of leadership. However, those traits and
behaviors do not necessarily mean that the leader was born that way nor developed that way.
Leadership is can be acquired in different ways. The important

Theories Of The Great Man Theory
Great man theory
This theory evolved around the 19th century, and was originally proposed by Thomas Carlyle. The
great man theory is basically assuming that, only an individual that was born with greatness is
indeed great. The focus on great leaders were limited to only men, as women were not seen as
leaders in any way. "Leaders are born and not made" (leadership theories). From this statement,
Thomas Carlyle is making it clear that a person cannot be made a great leader by any extrinsic
means, but it must be intrinsic traits of leadership that this person was born with, that can enable him
to become a great leader. "Great leaders will arise when there is a great need" (leadership theories).
By this, Carlyle meant that you may see a great leader every day without even knowing that this
person is a great leader, but as soon as the need arises for a great leader you will then recognize the
individual that was gifted to be the great leader in completing that specific task. This theory ... Show
This leadership theory argues that there is no specific way of leading, rather a leadership style
should be based on the situation. This means that when a person is set to lead, they will perform at
maximum level, however as soon as they are taken out of their element this level of performance
may fall. Also, a leadership style that worked well in one situation may not work well in another
situation and so it's based on how a leader adjust in various situations. "To a certain extent
contingency leadership theories are an extension of the trait theory, in the sense that human traits are
related to the situation in which the leaders exercise their leadership." (leadership theories). I agree
with this statement, since an individual in leadership mode would indeed possess better
characteristic traits than when they are not leading. This theory also assumed that leaders are more
likely to express their leadership when they feel that their followers will be

Characteristics Of Effective Leaders Have A Scientific Study
The traits that effective leaders have has always been a scientific study, the understanding of trait
theory is that effective leaders are born that way, not made, in early study it was called "The Great
Man" theory. Many scientific studies were done in from the 1930's to the 1950's.
The scientific studies that were done examined the mental, physical and social characteristics of
people, predominantly men. Most of these studies tried to find associations between individual traits
and leadership effectiveness. During these studies, physical traits like mental skills, social skills,
personality and even height were also studied. The conclusion that was eventually found from these
studies was that was no universal trait that separated effective leaders versus non leaders, or the
"Average Joe."
Early trait studies had several problems though; the measurement theory when these studies were
done was not at all sophisticated. There was very little known about the physical studies used to
operationalize traits. Due to this, different studies most likely used many different forms of
measurement to assess the same study, since there may have been different ways to assess the same
thing, the results cannot be valid. Due to the inconsistent findings from the studies that were done
trying to link individual traits to leadership effectiveness, most all studies of leadership traits were
abandoned in the 1950's. Still even today, the question still remains, are leaders born or

Leaders Are Born Not Made?
In modern day business, leadership has become an issue that is given far more attention and
investment than ever before. Leadership involves establishing a clear vision, sharing that vision with
others so that they will follow willingly, providing the information, knowledge and methods to
realise that vision, and coordinating and balancing the conflicting interests of all members and
stakeholder. This essay will discuss whether leaders are born not made, with varies of theories being
compared and contrasted and the strengths and limitations of leaders itself. Further this essay will
analyse the future aspects of theories which would establish whether a leader was born with
leadership qualities or made into a successful leader.
In the research carried out by Bass (1990), they found out that trait leadership theory believes some
people are born to lead because of their personal qualities, while others are not. Trait theory also
suggests that leadership is only accessible to the chosen ones and not available to all. In the past
researchers focused on traits that were able to measure such as physical characteristics, aspects of
personality and aptitudes. The current trait research has pointed the focus to more specific traits like
stress tolerance, energy level, emotional maturity, integrity and self–confidence. Reviews of the trait
research have found all of the above traits to be related to managerial effectiveness Bass (1990) and
Marques (2010). When looking at the results of

Are Leaders Made Or Born?
Are leaders made or born? The ever–persistent question asked when someone starts talking about
leadership. To this I say we were all born, correct? Leaders and the leadership role are not inherited
traits passed down through the DNA genome pool of the extraordinary powerful leaders. No, they
build upon their naturally skills and abilities, and observe behaviors of great leaders before them.
Believing in themselves that their best is yet to come. So the answer is neither, great leaders adapt
and learn from their surroundings, the best leaders are the beast learners.
As an avid learner, I too was using the concepts from chapter nine before I even knew about this
class or book. I have also loved and enjoyed learning about new ideas, concepts, or skills. I was that
child growing up that learning came natural, so I was not the traditional student; do the homework
and learn the new idea. Instead I read and then read even more, beyond what was ever the "required"
reading, because I wanted to. I was all ways trying to fulfill that thirst for knowledge, having this
feeling that one day it would pay off. Without even realizing, I transitioned this same mentality into
my career field. I was learning to be a strong leader even before I knew I wanted to lead.
The book says Learning is the Master Skill, I agree one hundred percent with this. Working in a fast
paced kitchen as head chef for a higher end restaurant, your leadership qualities are constantly being
tested. I love to read,

Are Leaders Born or Made? 3
Table of Contents
Abstract..........................................................................................3
Introduction.......................................................................................4
Great Man Theory...............................................................................4
Trait Theory.......................................................................................6
Great Man and Trait Theories..................................................................8
Are Leaders Born or Made?...........................................................................................8
Conclusion.........................................................................................9
References.........................................................................................10
Abstract
Leadership itself has been accompanied throughout time, by numerous theories, all claiming to
answer the question, Are leaders born or made? The leadership theory which concentrates on this
point is the Great man theory. The other theory in which I chose is trait theories and ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The idea of the Great Man also strayed into the mythic domain, with notions that in times of need, a
Great Man would arise, almost by magic. This was easy to verify, by pointing to people such as
Eisenhower and Churchill, let alone those further back along the timeline, even to Jesus, Moses,
Mohammed and the Buddha. Are some people born to lead? If we look at the great leaders of the
past like the one's that were mentioned earlier we will find that they do seem to differ from ordinary
human beings in several aspects. The same applies to the contemporary leaders like George W. Bush
and Mahatma Gandhi. They definitely possess high levels of ambition coupled with clear visions of
precisely where they want to go. These leaders are cited as naturally great leaders, born with a set of
personal qualities that made them effective leaders. Even today, the belief that truly great leaders are
born is common. Top executives, sports personalities, and even politicians often seem to possess an
aura that sets them apart from others. According to the contemporary theorists, leaders are not like
other people. They do not need to be intellectually genius or omniscient prophets to succeed, but

they definitely should have the right stuff which is not equally present in all people.
Trait Theories Trait leadership theory is actually a range of theories which share the belief that all
leaders are born with, or at least display, certain key personality

Leaders Are Born Not Made
Assessment Name: 'Leaders are born not made'. To what extent you agree or disagree with this
statement? Justify your answer using leadership theories and relevant example
s.
Word Count:
I disagree with this statement as leaders are made not born. If leaders were born than there will be
still the
Leadership is a process by which a person influences others to accomplish an objective and directs
the organization in a way that makes it more cohesive and coherent.
Leaders carry out this process by applying their leadership attributes such as beliefs, values, ethics,
character, knowledge and skills. When we think of leadership, we often think first of famous
individuals. We think of great political leaders: George Washington, Nelson Mandela, and Abraham
Lincoln. We may think of the leaders of social movements: Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther
King. We may think of spiritual leaders: Jesus Christ, Muhammad and Mother Teresa. We may think
of management leaders like Steve Jobs, Bill Gates and Richard Branson. We also include in our
definition some of the infamous leaders such as Adolf Hitler, Idi amin, or Saddam Hussein.
Obviously, leadership is not always or automatically good in and of itself.
Most of leadership is made, not born. Believing leaders are mostly born could have dangerous
consequences. Good leaders develop through a never ending process of self–study, education,
training and experience.
The executives, who believe that leaders are born, give less

Biography Of Martin Luther King, Mahatma Gandhi, And...
Leadership.The word leadership was once thought of as something that you were born with, hence
the very popular saying "Great leaders are born, not made" ("What Makes An Effective Leader").
Martin Luther King, Mahatma Gandhi, and Nelson Mandela were all great examples of people who
were natural born leaders. These three leaders were very charismatic, which enabled them to gather
many followers. To some extent, being born a leader was true because according to David Celeste,
"Qualities such as charisma with which one is born", is a leadership quality that cannot be taught nor
learned. If a person is not born with charisma then they 'll have a tough time finding people to lead.
Certain qualities that people are born with enable them to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Maintaining the peace and enforcing the law, requires officers to have leadership qualities. An
example of a great leadership is having the ability to set the bar high. According to Morreale,
"leaders set high standards of conduct and become role models, gaining trust, respect and
confidence from others;..." (Preparing Leaders for Law Enforcement, 2004). A leader wouldn 't do
the bare minimum that their job requires them to do. Leaders know that they are being watched and
aren 't afraid to be observed because they want to be observed. Morreale described how leaders that
set high standards of conduct end up becoming role models. This according to him inspires others to
do the same. Essentially, a leader inspires others to practice leadership qualities. A role model
inspiring others to set the bar high for themselves is an example of how leadership can be developed
and learned even within the lower ranks. For management, in order to develop the ability to set the
bar high, they themselves must set the bar high for themselves. Leaders must be able to accept
change. The criminal justice system is constantly dealing with new situations that requires
individuals to know how to deal with change. Unfortunately, the FBI reported that the law
enforcement often frowns upon those who try to change things and that there is a "tremendous"
emphasis to "do the job the way it 's always been done". Law enforcement officers aren 't
encouraged to

Trait Theory Is Flawed: The Style Approach To Leadership
The critique with the most supporting evidence to suggest that trait theory is flawed is possibly the
Style approach to leadership. The style approach was developed in the 1940's and is centralised
around the idea that it is not what traits and characteristics the leader possesses, but rather the in the
behaviours they exhibit (Roberts, 2013). This argument analyses the types of behaviours, which the
leader has, and they ways in which they carry out their business, as opposed to the trait they may
have been born with.
Stodghill was one of the founding writers within Style approach theory, and similar to Allport, many
have since developed on his work using it as a basis for their argument, Mcaffery being one of them.
In 2004 Mcaffery analyses ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When beginning to study this debate I found a whole host of information on both Trait Theory and
also The Style Approach. Having read a lot around this topic I believe that the both theories have
credible points that they raise, as well as both having some flaws which I believe discredit the work
of the theory. I personally believe that there is some form on "inner knowledge" that leaders possess
which enable them to become successful in their role, however I think that situational and
environmental factors play a big part as to whether they individual is likely to achieve this leader
status. However I do also believe that through extensive study there is the possibility for someone
who does not hold this gene to learn the skills and techniques that are needed to be able to become a
successful leader. Which appears to be a view that I share with Nielsen et al, 2015, as they state that
Leaders are both born and made, some traits are inherited and emerge over time and others are
learned through experience (Nielsen, Et Al,

Are Leaders Made or Are Leaders Born?
The age old question. Are leaders made or are they born? My belief on this – I believe that a leader
is made, not born. Why do I say that? Before going further, lets be clear on one distinction – when
we say a leader is made, it does not mean that someone can be taught to become a leader by
attending leadership courses. While it helps, it is not enough. Warren Bennis (a leading leadership
researcher) believes that one cannot be taught to become a leader but one can learn to become a
leader over the years through life and work experiences, through mentors, personal reflection, etc.
What is a leader by the way? For the purpose of this discussion, lets define it as someone with
formal leadership authority in an organization. There is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, if I'm aware that I am not optimistic enough and tend to think of the downside more
often than the upside, I can learn to become more optimistic because I know doing so helps
strengthen that leadership trait in me. As a side point on the topic of optimism, evidence from
decades of research by Dr Martin Seligman shows that people can learn to be optimistic. The topic
is examined in great depth in his bestseller "Learned Optimism" – another excellent book I would
recommend as well.
In summary, I would reiterate that while there are natual born leaders, leaders can indeed be "made"
or developed if one adopts a growth oriented

Are ‘Great’ Leaders Born or Made? Illustrate Your...
The question of whether exceptional leaders are born with their strong leadership skills or if they
develop them over their (sometimes quite short) lives has been a point of controversy for a long
time, making many scientists scratch their heads. In the 20th century there was a strong belief that
we are able to become whoever we want to, nowadays, due to rapid progress in genetics we are
being told that our genes can make us prone to be more aggressive, have diabetes, cancer...but does
it actually mean we can be predetermined to be good leaders as well? In order to make my essay as
impartial as possible, I will analyze examples of leaders of different backgrounds, varying from
Osama Bin Laden to Arnold Schwarzenegger and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
At an early age of 12 he was already engaging himself in conversations with religious leaders in
Jerusalem, which clearly indicate his gregarious nature and emotional intelligence well beyond his
age. Throughout his life he also kept his commitments, which is something that few leaders can
boast about, since many of them tend to adjust to constantly changing circumstances. He also
preached humility and love to each other. He practised what he preached too – by washing his
disciples' feet – something that would normally be carries out only by slaves. If we were to classify
his type of leadership even further, we could use University of Michigan Study which identifies two
behaviour characteristics associated with effective leadership: 'Employee oriented' or 'Production
oriented'. Since religion can be compared in certain aspects to any other industry, describing Jesus as
an "employee oriented" leader would be the most suitable comparison due to his sensitivity to
followers needs. In spite of him displaying all those leadership traits, I think it is important to
remember that he grew up knowing that he was special. If we look back at the very beginning of his
life, right at his birth he was visited by the Magi (Three Wise Men). Various passages of the bible
indicate that Jesus was a scholar learned in the scriptures and religious literature which was widely
available at the time. Having all of this in mind, we can clearly see that he was obviously

Why Leaders Are Born Or Made?
There is a well–known and often asked question of whether leaders are born or made. While the
origin of the question is unknown, the answers in response to the question are numerous. The terms
leadership and management have become increasingly prevalent in today's workplace. They are
often used in place of each other and in some cases the terms leadership and management are used
identically to each other. This has not always been the case. Leadership has a long history that dates
as far back as biblical times. According to Bass, "it is one of the world's oldest preoccupations"
(Bass, 1990). On the other hand, management as it relates to the workplace is a relatively new
concept in that it became more visible in organizations around the time of the Industrial Revolution.
It was during this time that large scale industrial plants with their high number of employees were in
need of people and processes that would make their complex and disorganized organizations operate
smoothly and more efficiently (Kotter, 1990). As a result, management as it is known today became
commonplace. The evolution of management since the Industrial Revolution has undergone many
changes. It was the catalyst that brought about changes in the way management was perceived and
administered in the workplace (Kotter, 2013). The management needs of organizations since the
Industrial Revolution still require regulation, order, and consistency. Many modern day
organizations often use

The Interview With Sara Watkins
Introduction Every individual has their own perception on what a leader is to them. What is a
leader? What characteristics does a leader have? Are leaders born or made? These questions, along
with many more throughout the process have given a general idea of what a good leader entails.
This grouped included 17 anonymous interviews that provides the thoughts and opinions of what
leadership is, which include similarities across the board along with some differences.
Analysis
There are two different kinds of leaders. One would be a team player and the other is more of a
dictator. Going through the interviews it was clear to point out which were more of a team player
when it came to leadership as opposed to one who would just call the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Key words and phrases that I found in the research that correlate are anyone who influences, who
sets a good example, and is a great communicator.
There was also good feedback on whether a leader can be born or made. A majority seemed to think
that the answer is both. Nature vs. Nurture was brought up on multiple occasions throughout the
interviews saying that both are important. This made sense because just like any trait, if you don't
use it then you lose it. One might be born with the right traits and characteristics but it is ones
experiences that really brings them to light. It was brought up more than once that being born with
those traits just makes the path to being a leader easier. Though there was one who thought one
could only be born to be a leader.
James: "I honestly think you are rather born with it because you cannot force somebody to lead
somebody else no matter how much knowledge you have about a subject does not mean that you
can actually do it..."
James has a good

The Great Man Theroy
The Great Man Theory
This term paper explains the leadership style of "The Great Man Theory", by Thomas Carlyle, a
historian of nineteenth century. The idea of the theory is leader and leadership. The basic idea of the
theory is that leaders are born and not made.
Thomas Carlyle, a historian in nineteenth century presented his ideas on leadership, named "The
Great Man Theory." Carlyle focused on the influence great men had on historical events. Like great
people such as Mohammad, Shakespeare, and Napoleon among others (Goleman).
The basic theme of The Great Man Theory is that "Leaders are born and not made" (Bass). Research
done in the nineteenth and early part of twentieth century on the leadership primarily focused on the
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The distinctive feature is a gift or talent, according to some scholars including Carlyle. The theory
strongly asserts that leaders are born having such mystical abilities and are different from their
followers.
"Personal Factors: Cognitive– pluralist, radical and unitary ideologies, orientation of social
domination: Motivational– authoritarianism: Moral– egalitarianism and moral development along
with moral scope (Goleman, 48)."
"Situational Factors: Deep structures– norms, roles, history, distribution of wealth and hierarchy:
Goal Interdependence; and Culture (Goleman, 48)."
From mid–nineteenth century to the decade of 1940, the research on leadership was dominated by
efforts to show that there are characteristics or qualities that leaders have that set them from
followers. The research shows that leadership abilities are that of an effective and successful leader.
Studies have focused on the measurement of leadership traits and the relationship that is between
criteria and traits of leader

My Collaboration Process
Collaboration Process: Before this year I had no idea that there was more than one skill to
collaboration at all. I was fresh off of learning what collaboration was when I was introduced to the
skills that made it up. However, as the year went on I learned what the skills in collaboration were,
how it is important to leadership and to master it. Collaboration is made up of Decision–Making and
goal setting. What I learned about this skill is that Decision–making is very important to
collaboration because collaboration depends on people working together. Working together means
that people have to know how to make a decision in a group. I also learned that goal setting helps
the group who is collaborating have a vision that guides the group for ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The first piece of evidence was the definitions of Democracy and Articracy. This is important in
knowing about leadership because it is two of the most common types of leadership. This shows I
learned the skill because it allowed me to see the differences in the two and then I was able to decide
which one seemed to work in different circumstances. The second is the egg drop we did in class.
This egg drop was good at expressing the pros and cons of each of the two types of leadership. It
shows I mastered these skills because I could see that Artiscracy had it's uses if a group had to rush
and had certain things to get done fast and that democracy also had it's uses but it had to require the
whole group to agree. It really showed me the differences of the two. The final piece of evidence
was the debate of leaders born vs. made. Mastering this skill shows that now I know that some
leaders have traits while being born while most get their skills through experience. It helped me
realize that leaders are made and that anybody and everybody can become a

Leadership And Leadership : Effective Leadership
This chapter teaches us knowledge of how effective leadership can provide positive ways to
influence others in order to accomplish goals. Managers could use trait leadership perspectives to
become better leaders. As a leader, motivating your employees is key to an organizational structure.
Leadership is a process which commences by following. Skill set born with or learned. As a
follower one can learn and improve in their performance to be an effective leader. According to the
text, leadership influence can be located in one person or be distributed throughout the group (pg.
282).
Formal v. Informal Leadership
The difference between them both, to my understanding is, is simply that one is related to a position
held by and individual (i.e., professors, ministers, politicians). Informal is a leader not needing to be
in a titled or authoritative position. They just have set skills to be effective leaders and influential on
others.
Leadership as Social Construction
Leadership role constructed in a social setting. Depending on the interaction in a social setting
needing a leadership role.
Leadership as Identity Construction
The leadership identity construction involves the following process:
Claiming refers.
Granting.
These traits help to identify between leaders and followers. A model designed by DeRue and
Ashford's. FOLLOWERSHIP
In this part founded interesting how there is such an infatuation with the studies of leadership and
not on followers. Especially,

George Washington: An Example Of An Effective Leader
When being asked if a leader is "born" or "made", I always say it is both. I believe a person needs to
be born with certain personality traits in order to be effective leader, but also they have to be taught
different skills so they know how use their personality traits. By combining the different theories, I
believe we can see what it takes to be leader. They must have the traits of emotional stability, open
to experience, conscientious, and intelligence. They also need to go through different experiences
and situations in life in order to be taught more leadership skills. I think an excellent example of a
leader was the first United States President, George Washington. I will use George Washington's life
to show a leader needs to be both ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He gained a reputation for himself after enduring a 900 mile journey in the dead of winter, risking
his life. I believe he learned many skills on this journey including endurance, motivation, and
willpower. All of these skills which a leader needs but not necessarily born with. If Washington had
not taken or survived this trip, he would not had been made Commander in the Revolutionary War
and eventually, become the first United States President. He showed Congress and the new formed
United States what a real leader was. Fiedler's Contingency Model says a leader is either task
motivated or relationship motivated. I believe George Washington wanted the United States to be its
own country, and even though it kept him from a peaceful life with his family, he led as President
because he knew he was

Are Leaders Born Or Made?
"Are leader born or made?" I still remember the first time I had to seriously ponder that question. It
happened in August of 2011. I was roaming through a roomful of tables showcasing all the
extracurricular activities of my new community college. Suddenly, I stopped in front of a table with
a one–word poster: "L.E.G.O.". What attracted me to that table was the feeling of familiarity of the
word to my native language, Spanish. It is not really a word in Spanish and at that time, I didn't
know if it was an actual word in English. When I finally got near the table somebody gave me a
brief overview of what LEGO was and told me I could fill out an application and write a short essay.
The question of the essay was "are leader born or made?" and I decided to give it a shot. That was
the day I officially began my quest in finding out who I was as a leader. Today I believe leaders are
made and not born because my experience in life has shown me that being a leader is more than
having an extrovert personality is about being able to learn, recognize and follow great leaders, and
learn to be a follower as well as a leader. If leaders were born and not made my personality would
suggest I was anything but a leader. Some people say that depending on the child personalities, a
person could be a leader or not. As a child, I was not social nor shy. Normally, extroverted children
would spend their time calling their parents attention, but I spent it exercising my curiosity. At home
and in

The Importance Of A Leader And The Process Of A Leadership
As Northouse (2013) mentions, there are phrases as 'he was born to be a leader' or 'she is a natural
leader' which suggest that people tend to think good leaders are born and not made. Can people learn
how to be a leader, or they are born to be a leader? This question possessed the minds of many
researchers for many years, and often asked by the top managers. Long–term studies did not give a
satisfactory answer; however, teachers of management tend to believe that most of the leadership
skills can be developed by people themselves. Although, it is needed to have the appropriate
personality traits from the beginning. There are a lot of various leadership theories which may help
to understand the characteristics of a leader and the process of a leadership.
Fiedler and Garcla (1987) stated that leader is defined as a person who is "appointed, elected, or
informally chosen to direct and co–ordinate the work of others in a group". According to trait
theories, effective leaders share a number of common characteristics or 'traits'. The first studies have
tried to identify the qualities that distinguish the great leaders in the history of the masses.
Researchers believe that the leaders had some unique set of stable traits, which do not change as
time pass. For this reason, scientists have tried to define leadership qualities, learn to measure and
use them to identify the leaders. This approach is based on the belief that leaders are born, not made.
For example, Smith and Foti

My Leadership Philosophy
To be a leader in today's society, in my opinion, one must possess genuine abilities that empower
and strengthen those they wish to lead or mentor. The idea that an individual is born with the skill
set and talents of someone that has spent the majority of their life "evolving" through priceless
experience is both extremely farfetched and a bit unbelievable. However, throughout my own
experiences, I have seen others achieve leadership positions through training and or personal
development. Moreover, I am sure that there are some "would be leaders" that have a natural talent
for leadership but I use the term "some" lightly. Research has shown that the qualities of a leader are
not necessarily tied to one or the other but leaders have shown

Leaders Are Born Or Made?
The question of whether leaders are born or made, is one that has been asked just as much as which
came first, the chicken or the egg. It is a question, which all of us ponder through our own journey
in leadership. For most of us, becoming an effective leader is hard and daunting work. Some of us
grow up wanting to be leaders, while others sort of just fall into leadership, without really realizing
when or how they became leaders. For some, leadership begins at an early age, perhaps during
childhood. Others begin their journey later on in life, as they enter the workforce and co–workers
are naturally drawn to them, going to them for direction, advice or guidance. Whatever, the start of
one's leadership role, I believe we all show leadership at some times in our lives, some just are in
those roles for most of their lives. Being an effective leader is about transforming ourselves, from
what we are to what we want to be. As leaders we must be able to embark on a deep and personal
journey of self–growth, in order to realize great results in ourselves and our organization. Before
being able to call ourselves great leaders, we must be able to lead ourselves, to believe that we have
the ability to impact others in a positive way and more importantly, we must believe that our actions
have the power to motivate others and inspire them to do and accomplish great things. I think it is
important to remember that how we exercise authority or leadership over others is an

Managers Can Be Developed, but Leaders Are Born, Not Made.
Managers can be developed, but leaders are born, not made.
Table of contents
Table of contents ii
1 INTRODUCTION 1
2 BODY OF ARGUEMENT 1
2.1 THE ROLE OF THE MANAGER 1
2.2 THE ROLE OF THE LEADER 1
2.3 OVERLAP BETWEEN THE ROLES OF MANAGER AND LEADER 2
2.4 CAN THE ROLES OF THE MANAGER AND LEADER BE DEVELOPED? 2
2.5 CAN GREAT LEADERS BE DEVELOPED, OR ARE THEY BORN? 3
3 CONCLUSION 4
4 REFERENCES 4
1 INTRODUCTION
To debate the statement 'managers can be developed, but leaders are born, not made' we first need to
gain an understanding of the roles played by managers and leaders, outlining the perceived
differences and how these have evolved over time. This will provide the context for discussion of ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Zaleznik (1977) contends there has been a shift from the leader being viewed as an idolised head of
business, to an artist. This has been summarised by Angelucci (2005: 12) as leadership revolving
around the art of managing people "which requires willingness to accept and understand their
human aspects and diversity".
Singe (1997: 32) went further by suggesting we have "to surrender the myth of leaders as isolated
heroes commanding their organisations from on high". In future, leadership "will be distributed
among diverse individuals and teams who share responsibility for creating the organisations future".
These findings suggest the isolated roles of manager and leader should cease to exist, and that all
organisations need elements of leadership throughout.
2.4 CAN THE ROLES OF THE MANAGER AND LEADER BE DEVELOPED?
Management in its basic technical form is tangible and can be developed. Budgeting, resource
allocation and human resource management courses are widespread. Interestingly Bennis (2009)
found throughout his study that United States organisations were under–led and over–managed. He
placed fault with the management schools, suggesting they trained candidates technically but not as
leaders. Hence, the difficulty lies in developing the leadership skills necessary throughout

organisations.
Parks (2005) argues that leadership is not reliant on having appropriate natural

Basketball Legend Kobe Bryant
Basketball legend Kobe Bryant, once said, "If you're going to, you're not going to please everybody.
You gotta hold everybody accountable, even if you have that moment of being uncomfortable."
Kobe Bryant was a basketball player who played for the Los Angeles Lakers his whole career. He
was not just a basketball player but a captain and leader for his team. But he wasn't always this way.
When he first started it out he was very shy, immature, and very comfortable, not leadership
material. But through trial and error, consequences and repercussions, he grew to become a very
successful leader and player. The results speak for themselves, multiple MVPs, Championships, and
many other accolades. A leader comes in all shapes and sizes. From basketball players to politicians,
and even presidents and dictators. A leader is a leader no matter what the job may be and anyone can
become one. Leaders are born and not made because of skills, experience, and development.
According to Merriam–Webster, "leadership is the office or position of a leader recently assumed
the leadership of the company; capacity to lead." The key word is the capacity to lead. Anybody and
anyone can lead, it just takes experience and training. In a recent 2017 journal, the author states,
"We all have talents, some which make it easier to step into a leadership role, but without the right
situation, development, and awareness, those talents may be wasted. Not everyone has the talent to
be a great leader, but every great leader needs more than just skills to fulfill that role." (American
Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2017; 81 (3) Article 58). A person can have all the skill and
talent in the world, but if they are not put in a certain position to go out and demonstrate those
talents, then all those abilities they have don't matter. Anyone can lead, they just need to be in the
right situation to do so.
A 2015 study stated 50% of Employers felt it was difficult to find candidates with the skills they are
seeking. The main reason for this is because people really don't know the difference between a skill
and a trait. Merriam–Webster's dictionary defines a skill as: "the ability to do something that comes
from training, experience, or

Leadership Development In today's business world, organizations will tell you there are numerous
factors that contribute to the overall success of the company. These factors include great people,
great culture, great leadership, great operations, and a great vision for the organization. In my
opinion, great leaders are the ones who inspire and motivate the employees to be the best they can
be. We have all heard the saying that "leaders are born not made", but I would argue great leadership
takes a heavy dose of self–reflection and discipline, along with consistent and constant educational
and mentoring experiences. Having been in leadership roles for over 22 years of my life, I can
assure you I am not the same leader today, that I was 20 years ago. The key for organizational
success is to have people that want to be developed while developing others. Great leaders typically
breed great leaders, and these successors are the future leadership of one's organization or the next.
Dubrin (2016) stated that leadership development programs are widely practiced in a variety of
ways across a variety of organizations. My research proved him right when comparing leadership
programs from the healthcare, fire, and education industries. In this paper, I will explain how leaders
develop through self–awareness and self–discipline. In addition, I will also discuss how leaders
develop through education, experience, and mentoring, along classifying the nature of these
leadership

Two Approaches Of Leadership And Leadership
Leaders throughout history have displayed many characteristics and traits which make them who
they are, and influence the decisions they make. Whether or not the leader was born with these traits
has never been scientifically proven. However, it is within human nature that we learn through trial
and experience to improve our mental cognitive ability, and therefore leaders are, until proven
otherwise, made not born. Whether a leader is born a leader, or made a leader is not relevant to the
end result. What is relevant is if one of the two approaches of leadership produces a better leader.
Leaders play a large role in society, and great leaders play a large role in history. Trying to
hypothesise whether leaders are born or made is ironic, as by studying that topic, you are effectively
helping to make future leaders. Leaders are crucial to the continuing development of the human
race. Without leaders, the world would hardly change from when humans first inhabited it. Leaders
inspire change, with goals and aims in place to further develop the human race. While not all leaders
have the same ideology as others, they are still reaching to enhance the population. Leaders have
been present throughout all history, and many have played a large role in how society operates
today. Leaders usually show many similar characteristics to each other, and for this reason, many
believe that a leader must have these same qualities or traits to be a successful leader. Of interest
however, is

The Great Man Theory Of Leadership
The Great Man Theory of leadership dates back to the early 1900s where it was strongly believed
that great leaders are born, not made. The basic premise of this theory has been contested since the
inception of leadership study. While recent studies show some evidence to the contrary, the
fundamental principle of the theory does retain some validity. The historian Thomas Carlyle coined
the Great Man Theory as he argues the world's history is simply a collection of biographies
belonging to great men (U, 2016). Although referred to as the Great Man Theory, the foundation of
the theory is gender neutral. It has more recently been termed the Great Man/Great Woman Theory
of leadership, removing the gender associated bias. The lack of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Executives, military leaders and senior government officials often possess a similar charisma that
empowers them to lead effectively. Although they have all likely attended a slew of leadership
seminars and workshops, there remains a certain x factor they all possess. To gain a worldwide
perspective on the question born or made, the Center for Creative Leadership posed the question to
executives spanning 53 countries. The results indicated a consensus to the contrary of the Great Man
Theory. More than half, 53.4% of respondents believe that leaders are made, referred to as "Mades"
while only 19.1% believe that they are born, "Borns". Interestingly, about a quarter of the executives
surveyed, 28.5%, think leaders are both born and made. (Mascone, 2013) Analyzing further, a
combined 47.6% think there is some validity to being born a leader. Thus, it proves difficult to
arrive at a conclusion with empirical data in support of either theory.
The survey expanded on various leadership topics in an effort to determine what Borns and Mades
believe are important characteristics of leaders. Both Borns and Mades believe that leaders should
be humane, charismatic, participative and team oriented. Borns are more likely to believe that
following protocol and behaving in traditional ways in accordance with the status and position of a
leader will make them more effective.

LEADERS ARE BORN NOT MADE There have been an age long debate, and humans since
beginning of time, have tried to come up with an answer to this question – Are Leaders born or are
they made?. This question has generated an age long debate, which in turn has resulted in various
school of thoughts, some believe that leaders are born, while others think otherwise. My
contribution to this lifelong debate will serve as a pointer to my position on this issue. I strongly
believe that leaders are born and not made. Who is a Leader? – "A leader is a person who guides
others toward a common goal, showing the way by example, and creating an environment in which
other team members feel actively involved in the entire process. A leader is not the boss of ... Show
I believe creativity is one of the top qualities that born leaders posses, its the ability to tap into the
subconscious to bring out great ideas. "Creative leaders have the ability to re–think their business
models and come up with ideas to drastically change their enterprise". (Stephen 2011) Although
Creativity is considered as one of the most prominent qualities that great leaders possess, another
key innate ability is Confidence. Confidence is among the traits of great leaders, confidence cannot
be taught; confidence for most great leaders is inborn. Francisco Dao in his article wrote– "Without
Confidence there is no leadership; leadership is about having the confidence to make decisions. If
someone is afraid to make and commit to decisions, all of the communication and empowerment in
the world won't make a squat of difference". (Dao 2008) Another quality that great leaders are born
with is Passion. Leaders always exhibit this quality in any area they find themselves. Being
passionate about an idea, a project, a business is just learnt in the confines of the four walls of a
classroom, it's a trait that is inborn. "Passionate leaders spread passion to others
through their love of life, doing new things, taking risks, being motivated, having a sense of
urgency, and reinventing

Leaders Are Born Or Made?
There is a well–known and often asked question on whether leaders are born or made. While the
origin of the question is unknown, the answer in response to the question are numerous. The terms
leadership and management have become increasingly prevalent in today's workplace. They are
often used in place of each other and in some cases the terms leadership and management are used
identically to each other. This has not always been the case. Leadership has a long history that dates
as far back as biblical times. According to Bass, "it is one of the world's oldest preoccupations"
(Bass, 1990). On the other hand, management as it relates to the workplace is a relatively newer
concept in that it became more visible in organizations around the time of the Industrial Revolution.
It was during this time that large scale industrial plants with their high number of employees were in
need of people and processes that would make their complex and disorganized organizations operate
smoothly and more efficiently (Kotter, 1990). As a result, management as it is known today became
commonplace. The evolution of management since the Industrial Revolution has undergone many
changes. It was the catalyst that brought about changes in the way management was perceived and
administered in the workplace (Kotter, 2013). The management needs of organizations since the
Industrial Revolution still require regulation, order, and consistency. Many modern day
organizations often use

People’S Beliefs On How Individuals Become Leaders Affect

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to People’S Beliefs On How Individuals Become Leaders Affect

Similar to People’S Beliefs On How Individuals Become Leaders Affect (13)

More from Miles Priar

More from Miles Priar (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

People’S Beliefs On How Individuals Become Leaders Affect