Atlas Shrugged Quotes Reveal Heroes' Ideals

Atlas Shrugged Quotes
The main conflict within this novel is the conflict of ideals between the heroes and villains of Atlas
Shrugged surrounding their motivation to do business. The heroes seek profit and personal success
from advancing in the business world, while the villains wish to work to improve the public good.
The heroes resisted the villains' attempts to push their thinking on them and their responses can be
summarized in Hank Rearden's quote, "The public good be damned, I will have no part in it!"
The quote comes from Hank Rearden's trial where he is being tried for breaking the law that
mandates the production and distribution from his mill. In the trial, the judges keep trying to use the
idea of the public good as a source of motivation and Rearden ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Galt came up with this idea while working at the Twenty First Century Motor Company, when the
heirs of the company took over and implemented their new plan of, "work according to ability, but
would be paid according to need," Galt does not agree with this plan and threatens to end it by,
"stopping the motor of the world." To achieve this goal, Galt begins to recruit the businessmen and
industrialists for America who have similar ideals and values to his own and convinces them to go
on strike and instead work only to provide for their simplest of needs. This theme of working not for
the good of the others, but for that of yourself is the central them of the novel and is what Rearden
implies in his quote. Galt eventually does bring a stop to the motor of the world as he begins to take
more and more of the industrialists out of the world and into hiding, and life in the outside world
slowly begins to crumble. This illustrates the dangers of making people work for others as
motivation to work and succeed. Their effort begins to decrease as the rewards for their hard work is
given to others instead. The events of the books show the dangers a world where the good of the
group is supported not by the creations and works of the individual, but by the taking from the
individual and giving to the public. Galt gives this warning to the world and it is an important theme
of the book and the quote, "If it is now the belief of my fellow man ... that their good requires a
victim, then I say, 'the public good be damned, I will have no part in it,'" confirms and declares that
the heroes will not be used by others for the success and survival of those who have not earned it.
The quote relates to the theme, in sharing the idea that he heroes will not be forced to work for the
benefit of the public at harm
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Analysis Of Ayn Rand 's ' The Fountainhead '
Blake Stawar
Ms. Haskins
Honors American Literature
27 October 2017
Objectivism in The Fountainhead Not many authors create philosophies to include in their novels,
but Ayn Rand did. Ayn Rand used her philosophy in the main characters and influenced American
society during the Cold War with her novel The Fountainhead. Through the actions of the
protagonist Howard Roark, Ayn Rand demonstrates her philosophy of objectivism and her belief in
individualism which reflect her opposition towards communism. Ayn Rand was born in St.
Petersburg, Russia in 1905 under the name Alissa Rosenbaum ("Ayn"). Around the time of Rand's
childhood, Communism had taken over in Russia. During the Russian Revolution, Rand and her
family lost many of their ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"In the bitter civil conflict, millions died; the destruction was extraordinary, and the reconstruction
therefore had to be slow and painful. Famine ravaged the land" ("Soviet" 2395). It may have been
these post–war conditions that fueled Ayn Rand's opposition towards Communism. The Bolsheviks
"took it for granted that they were acting in the interest of the people even if the 'people' did not
understand their own interests. The repression of ideas and opponents started at the very moment of
the creation of the regime" ("Soviet" 2395). The Bolsheviks suspended all trade once they took over
("Soviet" 2396). In the late 1920's, Joseph Stalin forced peasants to join collective farms ("Soviet"
2396).
The Fountainhead greatly influenced American beliefs during the time in which it was written. The
Fountainhead was published just before the start of the Cold War. The Fountainhead uses a
promotion of individualism and a rejection of collectivism to show Rand's opposition towards
Communism. When people in the United States read the book, it fueled, in part, Americans
opposition towards Communism. Some people believe that Rand's pro–capitalist views in her
writing may have helped influence the collapse of the Berlin Wall ("Ayn").
Rand used her philosophy of objectivism in her writing and in The Fountainhead. Objectivism
stresses the importance of individuality and rejects collectivism ("Objectivism" 7). According to this
philosophy, humans have free will and

American Beauty Movie Review
Final Essay
Diva Denissov
American Beauty is a classic example of a family in deep seated conflict and conflict management.
The four horsemen are employed here regularly by the main character of Kevin Spacey who plays
the role of Lester Burnham, a depressed suburban father in a mid–life crisis and a badgered and
repressed husband who is absolutely contemptuous of his wife Caroline Burnham who is played by
Annette Benning. Caroline is likewise contemptuous of Lester and his laizze faire way of
negotiating through life. Caroline is a Realtor who is seeking status and approval from the outside
world, her friends and her peers. Lester on the other hand is not seeking anything but to be
comfortable and to find some semblance of balance in his ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The neighbors are mirrors of each other, but the express their dysfunctions differently. The main
theme here is the dysfunctional nature of these two families who live right next door.
Lester is a man of character and principles, but he is simply disempowered by his conflict styles and
tactics. He is out of touch with himself and his wife, because he does not know what he wants out of
his life. He is out of touch entirely with his world and hates his job, does not know his daughter any
more and despises his wife for how she has changed from the hippie girl he married 20 years
previously. They do not talk about anything of importance, they do not talk about plans or goals or
wants or things that make them happy. They only talk about or discuss the things that irritate and
annoy each other.
They are both confrontational and also avoiding of their feelings. Caroline is inflexible and
dominant but yet she is passive aggressive over things that are trivial and of no real consequence.
She is completely consumed with attaining the acknowledgment of her peers in her profession. She
thinks of that as being the most important thing she can work towards or attain. She is completely
unavailable for her daughter and her daughter is going though a very challenging

Atlas Shrugged Essay
In the movie adaptation of Atlas Shrugged, the story takes place in a grim society that is in a severe
economic decline. Dagny Taggart, the movie's main character, serves as the vice president of the
Taggart Transcontinental railroad company. One of the company's rail lines, the Rio Norte Line that
runs to Colorado, is not operational and has a lot of accidents, so Dagny works to make changes to
revive it. While Dagny thinks the company should cut ties with its existing steel provider, her
brother James, the president of Taggart Transcontinental, wants to maintain business ties with Orren
Boyle's Steel because of his own personal relationship with that company's leadership. Dagny
decides to cancel the company's order with Orren Boyle's and signs with Rearden Steel instead
because they are offering a new product called Rearden Metal that she thinks could improve the Rio
Norte Line.
Next, James uses his own political influence to try to make Rearden sell some of its mines so that
Orren Boyle's Steel will still be competitive. In exchange for this move, he asks Boyle to use his
political connections to force Phoenix Durango out ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Because the Rearden Metal product is unmatched by the government's own production efforts, the
government works to keep the product out of the market by trying to buy the rights to the material
and by making false claims about the product to the public. These strategies by the government
discourage innovation and most likely result in increased behind–closed–doors lobbying by private
firms who have new ideas. The government is able to force Rearden out of the market with the
"Equalization of Opportunities" law mandates that the company give up all of its mines. Based on
the movie's depiction, it seems like the government has too much power in private industry if it is
able to essentially select which businesses fail and which

Extraordinary Potential of Man Revealed in Atlas Shrugged...
The Extraordinary Potential of Man Revealed in Atlas Shrugged
Freewill is the tenet on which men founded the United States of America, and the glory of "America
the Beautiful" stems from the unlocked potential of its people. The callused hands of the laborers sip
from the cup of American wealth, not the lazy plowman demanding government help. The inventor's
mind synthesizes, theorizes, and designs the American dream, not the indifferent, insolent mechanic.
The steel will of the industrialists propels the nation to greater heights, not the selfish arrogance of
the beggar. The men who carry the weight of the world, Atlas and his proteges, do so by their
incredible strength, not because of weakness, just as Ayn Rand asserts in her ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The mighty dollar is criticized, and those who work for their own benefit are branded selfish and
evil.
Dagny's brother, Jim Taggart, is infected, and works against her plans to expand Taggart
Transcontinental. He claims his humanitarian conscience will not allow him to watch his sister
conduct business with sucessful industrialists to the exclusion of less competitive and successful
tycoons. As Dagny travels from the steel metropolis of New York to the deserts of the Southwest,
Jim and his "Washington man" slow her attempts to bring prosperity to the fragmented company,
while she also works on a new railroad line, the John Galt. Why should Dagny try to drive people
out of business in her quest for financial success, Jim asks, if she has any sense of morality or
responsibility for the American people?
Rand tosses this question around for a while, before answering it with resounding clarity. In essence,
Dagny refuses to satisfy the desires of the people simply because they demand such right. In fact,
she, Rearden, and their fellow torchbearer Francisco D'Anconia only trade items, ideas, and
emotions of equal value to their own. In this way man can grow, reach his potential, and realize that
a truly positive outlook on life requires that one lives life, no matter how difficult, in accordance
with one's own morality and integrity. So, Rearden, Taggart, and other

Who Is James Taggart In Atlas Shrugged
James Taggart in Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand In the novel Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand, one of the
major philosophies that is instilled is that there are productive people in the world and non–
productive people. Rand makes it apparent that there are increasing numbers of ineffective
individuals who take advantage of the constructive people in society. James Taggart is the main
symbol that Rand utilises to represent the individuals in society who are unproductive, weak and
who thrive off other's success. James' first words in the novel are, "Don't bother me, don't bother me,
don't bother me" {{15}}, these words strongly establish his personality and how he evades his
responsibilities as the president of Taggart Transcontinental. Throughout the ... Show more content
After Dagny's resignation from Taggart Transcontinental, James randomly without any consideration
put an inexperienced individual in her place, Clifton Locey. Locey had made arrangements for Dr.
Charles Morrison to travel on a diesel–engine train to an important business meeting. The president
of Taggart Transcontinental, James, did not inquire in any means about this schedule, and was
abruptly awoken in the middle of the night by Dr. Morrison himself through an angry telegram.
James was highly intimidated by Morrison's words and called Locey to tell him to fix the situation
immediately as well as to tell Locey that he was never called in the night when Dagny was in
control. These words from James support, once again, the concept that he relies on more competent
individuals of society, and how he does not take responsibility when it is necessary. The words that
James said to Locey also imply that the success of Taggart Transcontinental was completely due to
Dagny, and how she ran the company. This point is magnified in the following actions taken by
James once he finds out that the Taggart Tunnel has collapsed, as well as the explosion between the
diesel–engine train and the Army Munitions killed everyone on board. James immediately contacts
Dagny though her assistant Eddie, and then he destroys Dagny's resignation letter once she arrives at
Taggart Transcontinental. James' actions are seen as highly manipulative, as well as irresponsible.
James ignored the extreme situations that were occurring at the company and used it to entice Dagny
to return to Taggart Transcontinental. These previously mentioned actions taken by James were
foreseen by his first words in the novel, which implied his evasion of his obligations, and his
destructive and selfish

Individuality In Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead
Ayn Rand wrote The Fountainhead which revolved around the protagonist; Roark's struggle to
maintain his individuality. The realization of the novel is altruism, value, and individualism which
guides humans to egotistic decisions. Roark breaking the law created the explosion of the ethics and
moral of the novel. He doesn't break the law by demolishing the Cortland Homes, but instead he
crushed the mass opinion of the false virtuousness of altruism and collectivism. Roark's ego
throughout the novels stands firm against public opinion. Roark being a person who believes in
individualism, designs modernized buildings. Even though he was offered many jobs to design
traditional buildings, he declines them. His defining moral characteristics are his individualism and
integrity. He guides every aspect of his existence by his own judgment, making him successful.
Unlike Wynand, Roark believes the fully virtuous man ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Roark felt that dynamiting the Cortland Home was a moral necessity to preserve the housing
project's integrity. When Peter Keating came to Roark for help with his design, he agreed to help
Peter under one condition. Inevitably, that promise was broken, leaving him with no choice but to
break the law and make it a test case for the court and jury to decide. This shows how passionate he
is about his work and that he will not compromise his creativity in order to accomplish his personal
goals. He had not even desired monetary or any other form of payment, other than seeing it built, for
his creation: "I agreed to design Cortland for the purpose of seeing it erected as I designed it and for
no other reason. That was the price I set for my work. It was not paid." The features for the building
being changed shows that people have no respect for him. This devastated Roark making him have
not choice but to blow the building

Essay on The Necessity of Selfishness
Previously, parents quickly taught their children the importance of sharing and considering others'
needs before their own. They expected their offspring to submissively sacrifice incongruent desires
and wishes. Parents did not tolerate selfishness from anyone at anytime. Then came the millennials,
also called the me generation. The typical millennial, concerned only with his or her own happiness,
pursues self satisfaction relentlessly. They only reflect upon their fellow man's needs when it
benefits them. Millennials have been called lazy, selfish, and worthless by their peers. This leads one
to ponder selfishness' roots, how it became such an undesirable trait and whether or not it actually
impairs society. Through Atlas Shrugged, Ayn ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
She simply argues that they should embrace selfishness enough to align their values and their lives.
She sates that, "the most selfish of all things is the independent mind." (Rand 943)
With selfishness clearly defined, Rand uses the plot to illustrate her conviction. She begins by
calling destruction sacrifice's result. When United States citizens contentedly give control to the
government, everything falls apart. Businesses go bankrupt following corrupt laws in fairness' name.
People starve and disappear. The government mistreats and abuses the public in every form;
however, they refuse to question their actions or even think. "I feel as if...as if there's no people and
no human language left...I feel that someone is screaming in the middle of the streets, but people are
passing by and no sound can reach them." (Rand 406) Eddie wilders captures what happens when
people willingly sacrifice themselves because a stranger orders it without revealing why. When
humanity will not use their minds, think, analyze or even question, when they rely solely on
emotion, destruction will inevitably follow. "Any refusal to accept reality, for any reason whatever,
has disastrous consequences.

Essay on Objective Objectivism in The Fountainhead by Ayn...
Objectivism is defined as "an ethical theory that moral good is objectively (based on facts rather
than feelings or opinions) real or that moral precepts are objectively valid." (Webster).
Demonstrated by Ayn Rand in the book, The Fountainhead, objectivism seems to most, to be
morally wrong, and socially impractical, despite seeming to be a stress–free way of life. In The
Fountainhead, Howard Roark does not see relationships as necessary, but as a means to an end. For
America to be purely objectivist would tear the country apart, in the sense that "normal social
relationships" would no longer exist, but hatred and racism would become obsolete. A democratic
government would be unable to succeed because no one would look at issues from ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Under the standard of objectivism these values cease to exist. Not that people would be selfish, but
they would cease to be selfless, and the less fortunate of society would lack the small amount of
charity that was keeping them alive. "Men have been taught that the highest virtue is not to achieve,
but to give. Yet one cannot give that which has not been created. Creation comes before
distribution–or there will be nothing to distribute. The need of the creator comes before the need of
any possible beneficiary. Yet we are taught to admire the second–hander who dispenses gifts he has
not produced above the man who made the gifts possible. We praise an act of charity. We shrug at an
act of achievement." (Rand 680). In an objectivist's mind there's a question of "Why should I?" or
"What's in it for me?" that would annihilate any sense of charity people possess. Objectivism is
faulty in the grand scheme of things, simply because people need one another to survive. People are
forced to interact with one another on a day to day basis, so from that perspective objectivism is
simply not practical. However, from an opposite viewpoint objectivism has many positive attributes,
such as forcing people to take responsibility for their own success or failure. In an objectivist
country, programs like welfare, disability compensation, and healthcare would not exist, so families
would be responsible to take care of themselves rather than looking to the government to solve all of

The Public Good Be Damned, By Hank Rearden
At his trial, Hank Rearden declares: "The public good be damned, I will have no part of it!" What
does he mean? How does this issue relate to the novel's theme?
When Rearden declares: "The public good be damned, I will have no part of it!" he refuses the
looters' insistence of sacrificing his production and happiness for the sake of others. He is attacking
Collectivist philosophy by accepting reality; one must produce for their own self–interest in order to
pursue their own happiness. The Collectivist's persistently try to deny reality and thereby break
Aristotle's law of existence: "A is A (1038)". If one believes A is not A, logically they contend a
person's sole motive to live is not for himself, rather, to live for others. This premise of self–sacrifice
prioritize faith, charity, and force above all else. His declaration condemns the entirety of this value
system and coincides with the philosophy of Atlas Shrugged; Collectivism is evil because of it
ability to drain the mind of its "volitional consciousness (1012)" and the assumption of rights based
on need, as opposed to ability.
Although he is preaching Objectivism, Rearden lives according to this philosophy only partially. An
Objectivist believes a person's highest moral purpose is to pursue happiness through their values. He
obtains the values, but subjects himself to guilt and shame for them. As Francisco D'Anconia
attempts to make him understand this fault, he asks "Why don't you hold to the purpose of your

Examples Of Narcissism In The Fountainhead
The Fountainhead, Who's the happiest? In The Fountainhead, we see Rand's main character, Howard
Roark, and his ensemble of supporting characters go through different forms of what is known as
rational objectivism and it's antithesis, more specifically, egoism, altruism, and narcissism. In
Aristotle's Proud Man, we see characteristics of narcissism in the type of "proud man" Aristotle
describes, most specifically that a proud man thinks himself to be, and is, worthy of great things.
However, these people are also quick to show hatred, which certainly doesn't fit the idea of
happiness. In The Fountainhead we see both Roark and Dominique, good representations of both
Egoism and altruism. In order to judge who of the three types is the most productive and happiest,
one could be best suited to look at the outlooks on life and the overall moral of the characters they
represent. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He's kicked out of his architecture school for having rules against his ideals of making modernistic
buildings, (of which he doesn't enjoy) This shows a strong sense of self and identity and in turn, this
makes him happy. Roark repeatedly claims to have his own goals, and most importantly, he believes
in his own purpose. This is perhaps best laid out in Chapter three, "...I love this earth. That's all I
love. I don't like the shape of things on this earth. I want to change them...for myself." (Rand, 49)
Here, Roark is giving his reasoning for becoming an architect in life, showing purpose, and gives a
clear goal, he wants to change things on earth. While at times emotional, Roark shows a joy, he
loves doing what does, and is willing to do whatever necessary to achieve his goals, instead of just
following the pack and being a normal architect, which would make him unhappy by his own

Ayn Rand Anthem Analysis
Ayn Rand's ideas of how the world should work is a form of modern government called objectivism.
Objectivism is the belief that moral truths exist independently of human knowledge. People that
believe in objectivism believe that the greatest moral goal is to gain happiness. People that believe
this are very hard workers and strive to be the best they can be. This is a very exciting way to live
your life because you believe that you can always be more successful and happier. Ayn Rand's idea
of objectivism is her philosophy for life. Objectivism says that you have to be completely free to be
life–promoting and they must be able to act on thoughts. Ayn Rand wrote a book by the name
Anthem that explains her views in a way that you can understand objectivism without even knowing
what it is yet. The book explains how a man longs to be free even though he's government controls
his life and forces him to be a street sweeper. His name is Equality 7–2521 just like many of his
fellow men. The people in this world do not have a specific identity and do not say "I" but instead
"We". He starts to question the authority the government has over him when he meets a girl that he
calls the "Golden One." It was love at first sight for both of them and soon ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Having common sense is the only knowledge man needs, which means that it is a form of survival
for us. Equality uses his knowledge to be a free individual man, to gain a specific identity. Later on
in the book Equality gave himself the name Prometheus and saw himself as a god like figure
because he brought knowledge to people. If somebody becomes a terrible person it is no one's fault
but his own because he did not use his knowledge to be a good person, therefore he isn't one. It is no
one's fault but his own if he does not succeed in life; he will not flourish if he does not pursue his

Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged : John Galt's Strike Of The Mind
"John Galt is Prometheus who changed his mind. After centuries of being torn by vultures in
payment for having brought to men the fire of the gods, he broke his chains and he withdrew his
fire–until the day when men withdraw their vultures" (517). Francisco's metaphorical explanation of
John Galt's identity symbolizes the major conflict in Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged: John Galt's strike
of the mind. Throughout the novel, many characters ask "Who is John Galt?" as a rhetorical
expression that conveys a meaning similar to "who knows?" These characters live under the notion
that "knowledge is impossible to man" (133). They have shunned the mind as useless, and
established a collectivist society that caters to mindlessness through the exploitation of the mind.
These ideals are the antithesis to Rand's philosophy, Objectivism, which is developed around the
ideology that man's mind is the motor that keeps the world turning, and thus, the use of it is the
basic standard of morality. John Galt is the epitome of a man who lives and breathes Objectivist
ideals, and acts as Rand's cardinal mouthpiece for the philosophy and how it outlines the essential
rules for living on Earth. In response to the collectivists, John Galt vows to "stop the motor of the
world" (671)–to remove the fire, the men of mind, from society until the vultures, the exploiters,
understand that their backwards thinking will only lead to their demise, as well as, to the destruction
of civilization. The primary

What Are The Parasites Of Atlas Shrugged
The Parasites of Atlas Shrugged
In this world, and in the world of Ayn Rand's imagination, there are two kinds of people: those who
live to create, and those who wish to live as parasites feeding off the benefits of those creations. In
Atlas Shrugged, she explores what might happen when the creators of the world stop creating; the
parasites are left to try to live on their own. The novels that Miss Rand writes always reflect this sort
of thing. She writes of the battle between the two types of people as some write of the battles
between good and evil. In reality, each side of the battle can be equated in such terms. These
writings provide a detailed analysis of the two forces, and leave the reader with a profound sense of
vitality ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He had himself convinced that he was doing the world a favor by holding back his sister, Dagny, an
idealistic Objectivist. Other demonstrations of this ludicrous practice are displayed in the characters
of the family of Hank Rearden, a successful and very driven steel manufacturer. His own mother, an
advocate of such practices as indiscriminate charity and pity, informed him of his supposed social
responsibility. She firmly believed that it was the duty of every man to give to every other man.
"Virtue is the giving of the undeserved," she said (265). These second–handers are the villains of the
novel, the only enemies of the true genius. The looters are those who sit back, allowing others to do
the work for them, so that they may simply return it with accusations concerning a lack of virtue and
social concern. They believe that goodness arises from living on one's knees, begging forgiveness
for a transgression that should not be considered wrong: success, greatness. Jim Taggart repeatedly
says things such as, "Why does he think he's better than the rest of us – he and that sister of mine,"
(899) in reference to people such as Hank Rearden, and of course, to Dagny. The only cause for
these statements, and this fear of greatness, is the evasion of the lacking of it in his own character.
The looters attempt to steal that which they could never be able to – the integrity of the

Jeannette Winterson Weight Essay
In Jeanette Winterson's novel Weight, the author demonstrates how myths have modern personal
relevancies and can encourage each reader to investigate the three main subject matters in their
lives; boundaries, freedom, and guilt. The numerous references to walls throughout the novel signify
the boundaries, which make Atlas strive for freedom. Winterson's Weight, is a modern rewrite on an
old myth of Atlas and Heracles, and the challenges they endure can be interpreted by individual
readers for personal relevancies. Atlas, a father of daughters, is faced with the burden of carrying the
world on his shoulders. This can represent a feeling as if one is carrying a world of stress and guilt
on one's shoulders and conscience. Heracles, the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Atlas constantly is escaping into the limitless of his imagination, where he is not punished for
wanting the forbidden. The Gods hoped that by punishing Atlas to be trapped in his body under the
weight of the world that they would contain his mind, and they were mistaken. This can be
interpreted as the strength and perseverance from within an individual. The wall that Atlas builds
around the Garden of Hesperides is constructed in such a way that it explains freedom and
nothingness that can sometimes be unappreciated. Winterson writes, "I built a walled garden, a
temenos, a sacred space. I lifted the huge stones with my own hands and piled them carefully, as a
goatherd would, leaving tiny gaps to let the wind through. A solid wall is easily collapsed. My
mother stirring in her sleep could do as much. A wall well built with invisible spaces will allow the
winds that rage against it to pass through. When the earth underneath it trembles, the spaces make
room for movement and settlement. The wall stands. The wall's strength is not in the stones but in
the spaces between the stones. It's a joke against me I think, that for all my strength and labour, the
wall relies on nothing .Write it more substantially – NOTHING." (p. 16). On the contrary, carrying
the world doesn't only make one feel trapped, it also feels as if one is carrying stress and guilt on
their conscience, which

Money In Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged
In Ayn Rand's novel Atlas Shrugged the character Francisco d'Anconia views money as a tool and a
symbol; something that can only come about by the hard work and ambition of men. He feels that a
love of money is justified, and is liberal in his employment it because he sees no arbitrary value in
money itself. This contrasts sharply with the view of James Taggart who sees money as a necessary
evil; something that must be controlled, and forced to work with the people. James Taggart is afraid
of money and what it has the power to do, so he attempts to limit it. You can see how this reflects
Ayn Rand's own views on the difference between communism and capitalism.
The difference in views between these two men is at the most basic level; that Francisco wants to
make money while Taggart wants to have money. As I said before, to Francisco and to all the 'good'
characters money is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They see money as its own beast. It is a necessary evil that must be controlled. Because they cannot
draw the connections between the money and its source they cannot justify the love of money. They
either acknowledge and embrace that what they do is looting and decide not to care, or like James
Taggart they remain in denial and self–deluded that what they are doing is for the "public good".
This is a reflection of Ayn Rand's own views on communism; the belief that money must be
controlled, and that if left to its own it will undoubtedly become a negative force, a detriment to
society. Because they cannot understand why money is valuable (though they acknowledge that it is)
they seek to have money as opposed to making money. This is why they attempt to freeze the state
of the nation, so that they may remain in an eternal state of "having" not realizing that there must be
motion and progress for money to be made and to hold value. They have the effect without realizing
the

Cliff Davis's Development
Cliff Davis – Founder of Tampa, FL's Davis Development
A skilled and knowledgeable Tampa, FL–based property developer, Cliff J Davis has completed
more than $200 million in successful real estate projects over the course of his 25–year career. He
has held official certification as a contractor through the State of Florida since the mid–1990s.
Educated as an engineer and a business administrator, Cliff J Davis has demonstrated a proven
ability to identify, finance, obtain, entitle, and construct many commercial and multifamily
residential structures. He also owns and operates multiple commercial and residential developments.
Clifford J Davis currently directs his own development company that creates mixed–use retail
centers that are anchored ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He also serves as a board member for PARC, a community service group that is dedicated to
providing life–changing opportunities for children and adults with developmental disabilities. He
has been involved with various children's charities for over two decades.
Cliff Davis – Real Estate Developer Based in Tampa, FL
Currently living and working in Tampa, FL, Cliff J Davis has garnered more than 23 years of real
estate construction and development experience. Completing approximately $18 million in
horizontal site work over the years, he has demonstrated the ability to identify and capitalize upon a
range of opportunities in the field of commercial real estate. Cliff J Davis has also constructed a
number of multifamily residential complexes and custom–built houses such as the 20,000–square
foot mega–home that he erected in

Analysis Of John Galt 's ' The Eyes Of Dagny Taggart '
In the eyes of Dagny Taggart, Vice–President in charge of operations at Taggart Transcontinental
Railroad, John Galt is worthless. The simple thought of his name brings out a bitter taste in her
mouth. She thinks he is an empty shell of man who is below even the lowest of criminals. Taggart
may as well call John Galt an "it" because he is not worth being called a human being, at the time.
Nevertheless, John Galt is a man whether Taggart feels like he is a worthy one or not. Galt is the
definition of a mystery. Even citizens are not sure of the whereabouts of John Galt. He is simply
unidentifiable. It is as if he lurks in the shadows and not a soul can find him, but they
psychologically know he is there. The thought of his name only emerges an unanswerable and often
wondered question: who really is John Galt? Moreover, John Galt got his start from Twentieth
Century Motors as an engineer. He soon realized while working there that the exercise of communist
principles became a burden on the workers. Galt could see right through the business's actions
unlike any of the other workers. It was as if they were slaves that were bound to the company.
Consequently, he decided to take initiative and put it to an end by declaring "to stop the motor of the
world." It was as though the company were trying to embed evil practices into the worker's
monotonous workload. Galt's pure genius helped him devise a plan to stop these wretched
procedures, and what better idea for employees to

John Galt Is The Mysterious Man
John Galt is many people at once. He is the mysterious man alluded to in a pessimistic rhetorical
question, the inventor–and the terminator–of the motor, the second assistant bookkeeper, and the
ominous destroyer. Galt is extremely unwavering and determined in his adherence to the Morality of
Reason; he knows exactly who he is and what he lives for. Paradoxically, the other characters of
Atlas Shrugged would be hard–pressed to come to a consensus on who he is. Galt's existence means
very different things to the general public, to the men of the mind, to Dagny Taggart, to Jim Taggart,
and to Dr. Robert Stadler in the novel. Their numerous and sometimes conflicting definitions taken
together serve to paint a comprehensive picture of the man that John Galt really is.
From the very first page of Atlas Shrugged, Galt's identity is shrouded in mystery; the question "who
is John Galt?" is on everyone's lips (1). For those who utter it, this question is an indirect summation
of all that is wrong with the world. Whenever an unfavorable situation arises, logical problem–
solving is rejected in favor of this verbal equivalent of a shrug. This phrase conveys the
hopelessness of the masses, the ambiguity of their values, and their inability to find fault with
themselves, all of which prompts the subconscious transfer of responsibility to a third party through
a question with no answer. Ironically, the burden of the impractical ideal these people subscribe to is
shifted to its biggest

The Power of the Individual Revealed in The Fountainhead...
The Power of the Individual Revealed in The Fountainhead
The Fountainhead provided and continues to provide a powerful inspiration to the individualist
movement in America, and throughout the world. More than any other single work, The
Fountainhead revived popular enthusiasm for a way of thinking, and a way of life, that in 1943 was
regarded by virtually every sector of intellectual opinion as outmoded. Ayn Rand's courageous
challenge to accepted ideas was rendered still more courageous by her willingness to state her
individualist premises in the clearest terms and to defend the most radical implications that could be
drawn from them.
The romantic individualism of The Fountainhead is like DNA; it's present in ... Show more content
He leaves immediately, without informing Dominique; he doesn't tell her where he is going or even
who, precisely, he is. Understood as a doctrinal statement about the conduct of relationships–advice
about what one should do when love conflicts with work–the episode is somewhat over specific, to
say the least.... Treated as a symbol, however, Howard's seeming abandonment of Dominique
becomes an intensifying summary of Rand's belief in the complete independence and self–
responsibility of the individual.
The meaning of the episode is further emphasized by its integration with all the other symbolic
episodes in the novel in which Roark refuses to exalt the Other above the Self. One of the most
memorable of these episodes is a scene that might be called the Meeting of the Antipodes. Roark,
the individualist hero, and Ellsworth Toohey, the collectivist villain who for hundreds of pages has
been plotting against Roark and everything that Roark symbolizes, are finally brought together for a
conversation. It is Toohey, not Roark, who feels the need to talk, so we have not just ideological
conflict but the psychological conflict that underlies it: it is Toohey–not Roark–who needs to talk to
others, to discover their opinions, to know precisely how cruelly he has wounded them and how
much hatred they bear for him as a result. Toohey urges Roark to say what he thinks of him.

Nonconformity In Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead
It is all too common in today's society to follow the accepted standards rather than promote one's
own ideas. Even those who disagree with this mentality often do not make their ideas known for fear
of backlash. Ayn Rand presents Howard Roark as an incorruptible individual unafraid of
disagreement within her novel The Fountainhead. Roark and his creator share the same ideals:
individuality, nonconformity, and the individual pursuit of happiness. Roark's motives are simply to
seek his own satisfaction without interfering with the contentment of others, and he never falters in
his drive to achieve his ultimate desires. His behavior wholly reflects this outlook, making him the
perfect ambassador for Rand's philosophy. Because of this, Howard ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He realizes that in order to understand a situation objectively, he must confront it honestly and
purely. Doing this promotes his well–being because facing situations in this manner helps him gain
an insightful perspective, which gives him an advantage over those who do not understand the
whole picture. Ellsworth Toohey, for example, encourages others to abandon independent thought in
favor of a twisted sense of selflessness designed to turn them into drones feeding off the speculation
of others. While talking to his niece, Toohey declares that consciously focusing on one's own
emotions makes a person become selfish and egotistical. He explains, "That is why the mind is so
unreliable. We must not think. We must believe" (365). Essentially, Toohey preaches that people
must abandon free thought because it causes them to dwell on their own emotions, which makes
them egotistical. However, ignoring free thought requires that one ignore the truth. Roark, on the
other hand, believes that one must not reject his own emotions so that he may find the truth and
reach his or her goals, as long as those goals do not interfere with the well–being of another. In this
sense, Toohey and Roark uphold two totally opposing ideas, further establishing a contrast between
the two

Individualism in The Fountainhead Essay
Individualism in The Fountainhead
Individualism, the doctrine of free thought and action of the individual, forms the basis of Ayn
Rand's novel The Fountainhead. The major theme of her fiction is the primacy of the individual, the
unique and precious individual life. That which sustains and enriches life is good, that which negates
and impoverishes the individual's pursuit of happiness is evil.
The Fountainhead is Rand's fullest explication of the primacy of the individual. As she worked out
her interpretation of the inalienable rights: the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; and
what these entailed, she saw three areas of conflict where these rights were held in balance.
The Three Antipodes: ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He tries to explain to people that "...An honest building, like an honest man had to be one piece and
one faith; what constituted the life–source...... and why if one small part committed treason to that
idea, the thing or the creature was dead .... and why the high and the noble on earth was only that
which kept it's integrity."
Henry Cameron, Roark's mentor both in work and principles had been very successful, but had
gradually faded away into oblivion. He did not give in to others' demands on him and worshipped
and believed in the 'heroic' in man....... he wished to build as he wished, and for that reason only."
For him Gail Wynand represented "everything that's wrong with the world."
Peter Keating, a successful young architect, Roark's senior, possesses a modicum of talent but
guides his life by pursuing what other people want of him. Though openly successful he is actually a
bundle of anxieties. This he tries to obscure by amassing wealth and following proper public
opinions. In all his major works, it was Roark who provided him with ideas.
When he achieves everything he 'should' want, he doesn't understand the hollowness of it all. He can
never be satisfied because he has never gone after what he wants. He is a parasite, a 'second–hander'
as Roark calls him; incapable of self–direction.
Ellsworth Monkton Toohey again is a 'second–hander' but of a worse kind than Peter Keating. He
preaches self–abnegation, self–sacrifice, and self–surrender as

Don 't Bother Me By James Taggart And Hank Rearden
"Don 't bother me, don 't bother me, don 't bother me." James Taggart, President of Taggart
Transcontinental Railroad and one of the last descendants of the distinguished Nat Taggart, exists in
a constant state of irritation. He snaps at any interruption; he whines at any setback; he dissolves
into hysterics when faced with a problem of any size. More often than not, he foists accountability
and responsibility for action upon his capable sister and Vice–President, Dagny. Bother and its
avoidance are a central part of Taggart 's existence. His "bother" comes to him in many forms,
simultaneously referring with different shadings to different circumstances; however, they are all
symptoms of his deepest, greatest bother. If his bother is felt as annoyance and perplexity, he is
bothered by the idea of business and its embodiment in the competent industrialists Dagny Taggart
and Hank Rearden. Taggart is first introduced as he swats at these bothers; Eddie Willers, that
honorable "feudal serf" of the Taggarts and their railroad, had approached him with concerns about a
wreck on his Rio Norte Line and its consequences (15). Naturally, he ducks that responsibility,
pleading "don 't bother me" and instead taking the opportunity to argue with Eddie over the ethics of
his railroad. He has no use for the particulars of business when, it seems to him, "there are more
important things in the world than making money" (17). This vaguely moral realm is one where the
primary virtues are the

Difficult Conversations In Social Work
Final Paper
Difficult Conversations
By
Wayne State University School of Social Work
Social Work 6991
Professor Pauline Everette
Fall 2012
Conflict is everywhere we go, at home, school, church in the community and especially at work.
How we decide to handle the conflict at hand will determine whether we strengthen the relationship
or break it up. Each situation can be dealt with in a way that can bring healing instead of animosity
and further pain. Most of the time conflict is looked at as a negative experience that most people
refuse to be a part of because of their own lack of conflict management skills; but if both parties are
willing to sit down and discuss the issue, there is a possibility of a positive ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
B) John's intentions were to convince me that all they were going to do is study and if I allowed it
with some ground rules like leave the door open, only when parents are home and a time limit, he
would have followed those rules only until I got comfortable with the idea and slacked up on
looking in on them, then he would have tried to get intimate with the young lady, which eventually
could lead to having sexual intercourse in my home. (Not going to happen)
C) My contribution to the problem was as John grew up, I allowed my best friend's daughter, (who
was the same age and they grew up together), to visit/play with John in his room and even to date
when she comes over she freely would walk to his bedroom and they would sit up and watch TV on
his bed, sometimes with the door closed. I felt no harm in the situation because they would say they
were cousins and treated each other as such.
II. What happen? What is the other's story?
What happen was John threw that situation in my face, he said, "Mom what difference does it make,
Kim, (name change for confidentiality), comes over lays in the bed with me to watch TV and
sometimes when you and her mom go out, she spends the night and me and her are only friends."
John' story was "Kim isn't my only female friend, you don't trust me."
A) The impact for me was tough for me to swallow; I was lost for words because he was correct. I

Roark And Peter Gaining And Ayn Rand's Fountainhead, The...
"Live and act within the limit of your knowledge and keep expanding it to the limit of your life.
Redeem your mind from the hockshops of authority. Accept the fact that you are not omniscient...In
place of your dream of an omniscient automaton, accept the fact that any knowledge man acquires is
acquired by his own will and effort, and that that is his distinction in the universe, that is his nature,
his morality, his glory," a quote from Rand's "For the New Intellectual" that defines one of the topics
in Fountainhead; the American Dream. The characters Howard Roark and Peter Keating strive for
their dreams, reflecting different sides of the path of success society created of the communal mind,
and individuals created of the independent mind. "The upward journey and the viewing of the
upward world as the soul's ascent to the intelligible," a quote from Plato's The Republic: VII
Allegory of the Cave; his philosophy of stages of knowledge to turn the soul to right desires;
resonating with Roark's path, showing that what's more important is keeping your morals and self
virtue, growing your knowledge higher. By the demise of Peter Keating, Roark's path to success,
and Ayn Rand's portrayal of society in Fountainhead, Howard Roark has the true success. Growing
up in Tulsa, Oklahoma, people started in the dirt and oil and I feel that represented the disgraceful
desires and temptations of society. Peter Keating personifies the darker side of the "American
Dream" society

How Does Ayn Rand Use Gender In Atlas Shrugged
In her book, Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand uses a fictional story to critique the end result of several
commonplace ideologies. The book most closely deals with the ultimate result that stems from a
Marxist slogan, "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." The world that
Rand creates has few differences from reality at its start, but as the story progresses, real world
ideologies are taken to the extreme, and societal collapse appears to be imminent. Much of this is
revealed through the thoughts and actions of a character that appears to be Rand's self–insert, Dagny
Taggart. Dagny finds herself alienated from both her peers and those in charge of industry based on
her beliefs and her gender. Rand uses Dagny's struggle ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Her gender also seems to contribute to the disdain that many characters hold for her. Because of
Dagny's refusal to excuse shortcomings for any reason, she pays little attention to any sexism in her
profession. Since much of the book is written with her thoughts at its forefront, Dagny's alienation
based on gender is easily forgotten. However, it is still evident. Rand does not ignore sexism; she
merely refuses to overplay it. One of the rare mentions of Dagny's gender in her work is found on
page 771, where Bertram Scudder introduces Dagny on his talk show with, "––the last descendant of
an illustrious name in our industrial history, the woman executive possible only in America." This
comment is brief, and appears harmless, but there is a deeper significance within it. Scudder uses the
words, "only possible in America," to attribute Dagny's success to her circumstance, detaching it
from her own effort. This is one of the ways that several characters in the book justify their
prejudice against anyone who is better off than them; they attribute any achievement or detriment to
circumstance, minimizing the accomplishments of others and excusing their own behavior. The
characters who exhibit gender bias against Dagny are not limited to men. In fact, much of the
sexism of which she is subject comes from other women. Readers are exposed to this in a brief
encounter with a minor character named Betty Pope, who expresses her disdain for Dagny, calling
her a "grease monkey. . .posing around like a big executive," (Rand, 73). She then comments on
Dagny's femininity, or lack thereof, implying that running a railroad is a task that is beneath a proper
woman. The next obvious drag on Dagny's femininity comes from her brother's second source of
companionship, his wife Cheryl. Cheryl Taggart's first encounter with Dagny is not a friendly one,
as she seems to feel the need to put Dagny in her place. She

Atlas Shrugged And Brave New World
The book that I am comparing and contrasting to the extraordinary "Atlas Shrugged" is the book
"Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley. "Atlas Shrugged" is about socialism. The Men in
Washington want everyone to be equal which is socialism. "Brave New World" is about people
making babies to be the mastermind of the World State. Atlas Shrugged and Brave New World are
similar but different
" Brave New World" was published in 1932. Aldous Huxley also wrote the books Visions, Books
and Thoughts, Crome Yellow, Darkness, and Doors of the Temple. Most of the novels written by
Aldous Huxley are classified as dystopian. Dystopian novels are novels that describe an imaginary
society that is as dehumanizing and as unpleasant as possible. "Atlas Shrugged" is written by Ayn
Rand. "Atlas Shrugged" was published in 1957. Ayn Rand also wrote the books Three Plays,
Anthem, The Fountainhead, Capitalism, We the Living, and For the New Intellectual. "Atlas
Shrugged" also has some dystopian tendencies within its 1,000 plus pages.
"Brave New World" is the story that takes place in the Central London Hatching and Conditioning
Center, where the Director of the Hatchery and one of his partners, Henry Foster, are giving a visit
to a gathering of young men. The young men find out about the Bokanovsky and Podsnap Processes
that permit the Hatchery to create a large number of almost indistinguishable human incipient
organisms. Amid the incubation period the incipient organisms go in jugs along a carpet

John Galt Character Analysis
Who is John Galt? A question asked often throughout the course of the novel, John Galt is an
unknowable entity, raised to mythical status by those who do not understand. John Galt is the man
who stopped the motor of the world. He is the man who would not sit by while those thinkers, and
innovators, those people who cared about the world, were slowly eradicated from it. The general
masses of people, those sheep were willing to vilify those that threatened their sheltered lives, but
John Galt would not stand for it. John Galt was the avenging angel of those who had had their life's
work stolen from them by people claiming it was for the greater good, of those people who so
desperately wanted to save the world, that they were willing to sacrifice

The Picture Of Dorian Gray And Atlas Shrugged By Ayn Rand
It is a very well known trope of literature to pin characters against society or social expectations.
Nearly every piece of literature has some character who is displeased with how "everybody else"
does something, it does not make any difference what the thing is. Following this near necessary
pattern, The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde and Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand have vital
characters who act differently than society hopes and expects. In The Picture of Dorian Gray, Dorian
Gray and Lord Henry Wotton are the main characters who represent the struggle of the individual
versus society, each in their own way. Lord Henry's philosophy is very self–centered, with his own
pleasures being central to all aspects of his life. This belief system rubs off on Dorian early in the
novel and as it progresses, Dorian seems to care less and less about how society perceives him. He
hides his true self away from society and throws common practice, even laws, out the window.
Dorian becomes a being who lives only to please himself through whatever means. Atlas Shrugged
has some self–centered characters of its own, stemming from Ayn Rand's philosophy of objectivism
and her belief that self–preservation and self–interest are the truest goals in life. Dagny Taggart and
Hank Rearden represent this belief Rand holds so dear. On the other hand, Jim Taggart is shown as
weak and nearly pathetic due to his need to please everyone and fear of blame. He conforms to
society so as to avoid conflict

Keating And Roark Analysis
" A creative man is not motivated by the desire to compete but by the desire to achieve." the quote
by Ayn Rand draw clear lines of demarcation between Keating's and Roark"s perception of success.
Keating's desires and choices had been devoured by jealousy and envy. Even his decision to join
Francon and Heyer was influenced by the jealousy towards Shlinker as the best student of Stanton.
His thoughts were governed by the pursuit of greatness in other eyes; appreciation from alien lips.
Thus, others gave him the sense of his value. On the contrary, Roark was a man with a purpose, a
self–promoter, with the sole motive of his own individual happiness which come from the successful
erection of his buildings. He is a creative innovator with his ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Pursuing what you love will ask for compromise subordinating your mind to the whims of others,
which is no less than the assassination of your freedom and your faculty of independent judgement
ultimately merging themselves into a collective whole. But the thinking embodies a frightful error.
Indeed a reasoning mind cannot work under any compulsion but it doesn't mean that one can't
pursue his love for his work which can be proved by Roark's ideology that it doesn't matter who will
let him but the fact that matter is who will stop

The Effects Of Ayn Rand 's Philosophy, Objectivism And...
Gage Cherry 7 SEPT 2017 ENGL 1010 Section 463 Bioshock: An Objective Look at Objectivism
and Anarcho–Capitalism It is in this paper that we will explore the effects of Ayn Rand's philosophy,
Objectivism, as it has been expressed through her novels (e.g. Atlas Shrugged) and subsequently the
Socio–Economic Movement that has risen because of it, Anarcho–Capitalism. We will look at the
consequences, both positive and negative, of Objectivism by examining 2K Boston's 2007 award–
winning game, Bioshock, and assessing how the fictional city of Rapture can be compared to a
hypothetical model of 21st Century America should we choose to adopt the ideas and Socio–
Economic Theories that are explored at length within the game. It is early on in ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Andrew Ryan's utopia has fallen into absolute disarray, which clearly demonstrates that Bioshock as
a whole can be construed to be a criticism of the dangers of Objectivism and the step that logically
follows it, Anarcho–Capitalism. Now how this matters is not simply that a fictional city in a fictional
game fell into anarchy and subsequently disarray as a result of this moral philosophy and socio–
economic system. What makes this a concern is that these ideas are becoming more and more
accepted within modern society. There are continuous discussions regarding a number of things in
today's society, such as "Do Corporations have rights?" and "To what limit should Government be
allowed to impose regulation on the Private Sector?" which can accurately be assessed as being
partially symptomatic of this increasingly prevalent line of thinking. Upton Sinclair wrote "The
Jungle" as a criticism, not of the meatpacking industry as a whole, but of how the workers were
treated.2 It is safe to assume that if we were to implement the line of thinking evident in Andrew
Ryan's 'utopian' Rapture, that we would undo over a century's worth of progress in regard to
Workers' Rights, Health Regulations, and a slew of other things which have only served to
positively impact not only the quality of life, but the quantity of life, of Americans today. One of the
major innovations in Rapture was the discovery of ADAM and following that,

Howard Wynand The Fountainhead
Howard Roark, The Fountainhead's protagonist and Rand's quintessential ideal man whose
independent happiness, reasoning mind, and moral purpose of life are absolute, diverges from
mainstream society into a personal autonomy; thus, he becomes invulnerable to the irrationalities of
humanity. In contrast, Gail Wynand, a dominant self–made aristocrat, possesses morals that
coextend with Roark's objectivist attitude, yet he deprives himself of one key component that Roark
fully embodies: ethics. Wynand's obsession in seeking the approval of the public rather than using
his own self reasoning to be the proper judge of his own morals, cements himself between the two
contradictory worlds––the world swarming with mediocrity and the one impervious to ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Or his professional life: where he preaches compliance and the necessity for supremacy by using
popular consent to impress others, while pandering to the most nauseating ideals of society––the life
of a second–hander. Wynand wishes to possess both lifestyles, but "he can't eat his cake and have it
too." Reason is what embodies man's morals which can only be discovered by man's senses.
Wynand surrenders to the life of a second–hander because his integrity was destroyed; therefore,
without reason it is impossible to create a sense of individualism. He succumbes to society, realizing
that man's most prime asset is acceptance: the ability to play the cards they're dealt with the most
minimal concern for the well being of others. He caters to man's lowest values because his
illusionary ethics are replaced by the demand for social approval. It's because the morals of his
professional life mirror Peter Keating's. At the dawn of his life, Wynand is placed on the path to
become a fountainhead, but he chooses the life of a second–hander as it's much easier and he doesn't
have to consider the sensibility of others in his quest for total power, or for what he believes to be
total

Jealousy : The Strongest Form Of Self Destruction
Maddie Fender
Mrs. Monzel
Period 6
17 October 2016
Jealousy: The Strongest Form of Self–Destruction In A Separate Peace by John Knowles, Gene
Forrester and his best friend Phineas, or Finny, as Gene likes to call him, live and confront conflict
at the all–boys boarding school of Devon during World War II. Gene and Finny possess traits that
vary greatly, which cause both conflict and jealousy for both of them. A compare and contrast of
Gene and Finny's perception of self and others and their conflict management behavior reveals
Knowles' theme that jealousy lies at the heart of the creation of internal enemies. Finny and Gene
both perceive themselves differently, as Gene's insecurities draw back to internal turmoil while
Finny's humble confidence causes jealousy between the two boys and creates a force inside the soul
that must be controlled. One afternoon, Finny and Gene are walking past the record board when
Finny spots the record for the 50–meter freestyle and says: "I have a feeling that I can swim faster
than A. Hopkins Parker" (43). Finny's confidence appears strongly here because he immediately
believes that he can swim faster than the fastest swimmer in the history of the Devon school.
Because Finny automatically believes that he can beat the record, Gene becomes envious and his
internal conflict and enemy within him starts to come to surface. When Finny finishes, he says that
he could "hear [himself] going just a little bit faster than A. Hopkins Parker" (43).

The Contributions Of Atlas In The King Of The Titans
Due to the lose with the war against Zeus, he was punished for the rest of his lifetime. The
punishment was rather simple, but cruel in a matter. He was the one who challenged the gods and
failed. Atlas was punished for his wrongdoing, he is mentioned in many tales and myths, and he has
a well known family. Atlas is a Titan who represents the figure that holds the heavens upon his
shoulders. He was the leader of the Titans when they went to war with Zeus, but after they were
defeated his fate was to bear on his back forever, the cruel strength of the crushing world, and the
vault of the sky. Upon his shoulders the great pillar, that holds apart the earth and the heaven,, A
load not easy to be borne. The importance of Atlas in Greek Mythology was that he was the leader
of the Titans, he was the one who challenged the God Zeus. However after his defeat in the battle,
his new purpose to the Mythology was to bear the punishment of holding the heavens upon his
shoulder forever. Atlas and his brother Menoetius sided with the Titans against the other Olympians
and when the Titans were eventually defeated many of them were confined to Tartarus including
Atlas's brother. However Atlas had a different fate, and Zeus punished Atlas to hold the heavens on
his shoulders to prevent the earth from resuming its joints with the heavens. He was Atlas Telamon,
or 'enduring Atlas,' a name embodying his daily struggle and punishment. Gaia and Uranus gave
birth to many children and among them

Ayn Rand Individualism
Ayn Rand Ayn Rands critical thinking throughout life made her a very successful writer. Her three
major notions encouraged readers to be selfish using reason, reality, self–interest and capitalism. She
believed happiness could be achieved no matter what standards, and to be content in life is up to
oneself. When Ayn Rand was young she looked up to Maurice champagne the author of La Vallee
Mysterieuse, Victor Hugo author of Les Miserables, and Fredrick Nietzsche author of Beyond Good
and Evil. They "showed her the power of a complex story with larger than life characters, and taught
her about the importance of heroism and individualism."(grade saver). This inspired Rand to not do
nonfiction to get the point across however, to do it in a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Her family witnessed the communist take over the Russian government. When she was ___ she
decided to attend Petrograd state university and state technique for screen arts where she came to the
conclusion that her philosophy was not meant to fit with the communist ideas. To protect her family
from punishment done by communist, she changed her name before anything she wrote was
published, her original name was Alisa Zinouyevena Rosenbaum. Her pessimistic experiences with
communism made her become a competitor of them. In 1926 she decided to leave Russia and go to
America "The land of the free."
I can say–not as a patriotic bromide, but with full knowledge of the necessary metaphysical,
epistemological, ethical, political and esthetic roots–that the United States of America is the greatest,
the noblest and, in its original founding principles, the only moral country in the history of the
world.
Being a patriot of America, Rand loved that "America's founding ideal was the principle of
individual rights." She favored The Declaration of independence rights for the people. Her Ideas of
Objectivism were a constant concept in many of her books, she encouraged readers to think with
reason and self–interest. "Selfish" in her ideas is used with a positive connotation, telling the reader
to "pursue your own happiness at your highest moral aim" (Ayn Rand.

Theme Of Hercules In The Iliad
The theme of an epic poem or short story is arguably the literary element that has the greatest effect
on conflict in a story.
Theme is what the characters and the audience are supposed to take away after finishing the story. In
Hercules and The Iliad, the overall themes of each story help to almost determine the conflict to
come, and how that conflict will help to shape the character.
Many consider the main theme of The Iliad to be the very first line in the entire epic poem, in which
a muse sings a song about 'the wrath of Achilles'. This opening line of dialogue sets up the epic in a
way that enable a lot of conflict to be set up.
"No man alive could keep the dog–packs off you, not if they haul in ten, twenty times that ransom
and pile it here before me and promise fortunes more" (Beers 64).
In this quote, Achilles is brutally informing Hector that he will not return his body back to his family
once he has died. This reflects back onto the theme of 'the wrath of Achilles', demonstrates how one
person's wrath can lead to deadly conflicts.
In Hercules, one theme that is commonly found is persevering against all of the struggles that one
may encounter. In this epic poem, Hercules has to complete twelve challenges in order to prove he is
a virtuous man (Hamilton). These twelve challenges easily allows for one conflict after another to
occur throughout the entire story.
"By and by, no Geryon was there, but a huge snake, like one of those which Hercules had strangled
in his

Conflict Style Assessment
By the time you are an adult, your basic orientation to conflicts in particular context is in place. Dr
Hebbard, through your experience, How do we change this behavior under pressure, abnormal
circumstances and maintain consistency?
Conflict styles are patterned responses, or clusters of behavior that people use in conflict. My family
participated in the Conflict Style Assessment. Three assessments were performed and listed are the
results. Results 1(I assessed myself)= 15, 17, 17, 20, 19 Results 2(my oldest daughter assessment of
me)= 17, 15, 21, 17, 24 and Results 3(My wife assessment of me)= 9, 10, 16, 14, 22.
The author stated that the only way to really manage conflict is to work through it by engaging the
other person. According ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Dad immediately expresses is dissatisfaction by verbally stating that basically they are wasting time.
Mr. Wimpy appears to be focus on the issue and states that it will only take a minute.
The members voted and the results are the same until the Watch Maker changed his mind seconds
later. The Watch Maker is aligning with Architect, Mr. Ghetto and the Old Man.
The Watch Maker changed vote triggered Dad as he continues to explode and become very angry
and agitated. He stated very loudly that the kid is guilty why do you listen to the facts! Dad tries to
entice Wall Street to align with him in the dispute. Dad shifts for the issue and begins to focus on the
person. He stated, what is this love your under privileged brother. Dad's verbal Aggressiveness and
verbal abuse are forms of communication violence.
Dad approaches the Watch Maker and asked him a question. Why did you change your vote? Dad is
trying to be very dominating in his approach. The Watch Maker stated that he did not have to defend
his decision but mention that he had a reasonable

Objectivism and The Fountainhead Essay
Objectivism and The Fountainhead
How should we live our lives? Do you live for others or for yourself? What do you deem to be the
ideal: selflessness, or selfishness? Why? Ayn Rand's novel The Fountainhead addresses these issues
and her philosophy behind it called Objectivism. Her rebellious rhetoric is to convince us that the
only true virtue is selfishness and that we should abide by its standards and live for ourselves.
Ayn Rand was from the Soviet Union, and her background helps us to understand her rhetoric about
why she preached her philosophy. "Born in Russia, and a hater of the revolution, Ayn Rand dreamed
of America as an Eden of individualism. When she got there – becoming first a Cecil B de Mille
extra, later a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Objectivist states that this is the only world we can know. It is irrelevant if there is a heaven, or
a hell, or life elsewhere. We know what we do through our senses and reason. What we perceive
with our senses we know to be real (Garmong). "Existence exists – and the act of grasping that
statement implies two corollary axioms: that something exists which one perceive and that one
exists possessing consciousness, consciousness being the faculty of perceiving that which exists"
(Rand qtd. by Peikoff 1)
The second point addresses the idea that thinking is the path to knowledge. The Objectivist rejects
the idea, stated by Plato, that all we know is that we know nothing. Emotions, feelings, and
premonitions are not concrete and therefore are rejected as sources of knowledge. Concrete evidence
dictates certainty thus rationalizing knowledge (Garmong). The third point is the ethics of
Objectivism: rational selfishness and the pursuit of our own happiness. We are the beneficiaries of
our own actions, and we shouldn't let others dictate our lives (Garmong). "Thought requires
selfishness, the fundamental selfishness of a rational faculty that places nothing above the integrity
of its own function. A man cannot think if he places something – anything – above his perception of
reality" (Rand qtd. by Peikoff 5). Politically and

Not an Ayn Rand Essay
The fiction novel, The Fountainhead, by Ayn Rand is based off of her philosophy of Objectivism.
Ayn Rand defines and separates her philosophy of Objectivism into four different and distinct parts.
The first part Ayn Rand explains is Metaphysics. Metaphysics is an objective reality where you only
accept facts as reality and not fantasies or desires. The next part of Objectivism is Epistemology,
which is reasoning by perceiving reality by using knowledge or facts as your guide. The third part is
Ethics and self–interest. The final part of Objectivism is laissez–faire capitalism, which is equal
trade while the government acts as a police force only. The third part of Objectivism, Ethics and
Self–Interest, is explained by Ayn Rand as ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When Ayn Rand wrote The Fountainhead, she intended to keep the syntax simple so readers could
get an understanding of Objectivism and individualism. We can clearly see that the protagonist,
Howard Roark, is portrayed as an objectivist and individualist, who also rejects the worst of social
standards, while Lois Cook is seen as a radical, who objects the best of social standards.
When we go even further into The Fountainhead, we discover that Howard Roark loves his type of
modernistic design in architecture rather than referring to the older and more identifiable types of
architecture from history, such as Greek or Roman architecture. Because he prefers to modernize his
own designs, he is suspended from Stanton's institute of technology and has been removed from
several jobs. Roark was offered a job to build a new bank, but he won't change any of his own
designs. The worst part about Howard Roark's out of luck situation is that his designs are
brilliant.Even Peter Keating refers to Howard Roark in needs of assistance, because Howard Roark's
designs are wonderful and unique to the eyes of people. Even then, when Howard Roark isn't given
credit for designing the buildings, credit was all given to Keating, who didn't have enough faith for
himself to, at the least, attempt to create his own architectural designs. While we continue to look at
Howard Roark, we can see that while Ayn Rand created Howard Roark, he stays as his own

Atlas Shrugged Quotes Reveal Heroes' Ideals

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Lorie Harris

More from Lorie Harris (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Atlas Shrugged Quotes Reveal Heroes' Ideals