Fundamental Differences Between Strong Mayor And...

Fundamental Differences Between Strong Mayor And...
Discuss the fundamental differences between weak mayor, strong mayor and council–manager
forms of government. In the United States of America, there are two forms of government that most
cities adhere to, Mayor–Council and Council–Manager. However, there is a third form of
government that a smaller few adhere to call the commission. Moreover, approximately 59% of the
cities in the United States utilize the Council–Manager form of government; conversely 33% utilize
the Mayor–Council form of government, which means the remaining 8% more than likely utilize the
commission form of government. Council–Manager Government In the State of Texas, the Council–
Manager form of government is preferred by all of the major cities, except for Houston who prefer
the Mayor–Council form of government. Under the Council–Manager form of government, the
voters are at the top of the hierarchical structure. In this capacity, the voters elect a small City
Council, including a mayor, who is the presiding officer over the City Council. Although the Mayor
is symbolically the "Head of State", he or she is not the head of government. The Mayor and City
Council have the authority to appoint four of the city's government officials: the City Manager, the
City Attorney, the City Clerk and the Municipal Judge (some cities elect this position). Moreover,
although weak in this form of government, the Mayor has a vote on many issues impacting the city;
however, lacks any type of veto authority (except in a few cities), which means that laws are passed
by on a majority–rule voting system of the total City Council Members, meaning all City Council
Members must vote in order to pass a law. Most importantly, the Mayor and City Council primary
role lies in the establishment of a strategic vision for the city. Once this is accomplished, the Mayor
and the City Council are responsible for generating a strong mission statement that aligns with a set
of clear goals, resulting in effective government policy guidance for execution by the City Manager
to run the city. Collectively, the Mayor and City Council hire the City Manager who has full
management authority, to execute the Mayor's and City Council's vision for the city. However, a
City
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Right Form Of Government
When Alexis de Tocqueville had begun noticing the way that his native country France had been
slowly but surely moving towards a more democratic ideal, he searched for a place where he could
find solutions to hopefully benefit France. What he found was the United States. There he looked
into studying the prison system but instead found himself perplexed by the state of equality that
seemed to thrive there. In America he observed how "equality of conditions" strongly affected
American society, and how the people lived (3). He saw that over the past 700 years events
seemingly beyond anyone's control had been driving the nation towards that specific form of
government; not to the extreme of America, but drawing closer and closer. He believed that
eventually the rest of France would follow at least in the principles of equality shown in the New
World. There was almost no way to fight this force that seemed to bring equality closer and closer
every fifty years. Tocqueville did not think that democracy was the right form of government for
every nation, nor was he advocating for it (12–13). He simply aimed to explore the way that
democracy had formed in America, so he could observe the benefits and the detriments to his
country. Alexis de Tocqueville knew that in order to control democracy, one had to develop the
system of government for it; socially, democracy was an unstoppable force beyond control, but
institutionally, it could be regulated, and shaped to fit the needs of its

Thomas Hobbes ' Theory That Absolute Monarchy Is The Best...
Human nature signifies the set of principles that define how mankind operates on a daily basis.
Generations have often debated the nature of man, with both optimistic and cynical views.
Government represents the organized structure that controls man. In Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes
advocates for an absolute monarchy to keep citizens well behaved because man is inherently self–
interested. John Locke, on the other hand, depicts in Second Treatise of Government that a bipartite
political society is the ideal form of government because we are in a state of nature and are free to
do as we please. Hobbes ' theory that absolute monarchy is the best form of government because
man is in a constant state of war is a sound assertion because humans have conflicting desires that
create a state of war, humans form government to alleviate the state of war, and absolute monarchy
provides the most efficient means of providing security that is absent in a state of war. Hobbes
articulates a "materialist" view of man, which asserts "life is but a motion of limbs," (Leviathan 3)
and that all men are composed of the same materials. It thereby follows that men, or simply matter
in motion, desire the same things because they are composed of the same things. Man's similarities
go beyond merely his composition. Man relies on certain necessities in order to maintain life. These
necessities, such as the need to eat food and drink water, correspond to all of mankind. Therefore, in
order to preserve life,

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Parliamentary And...
INTRODUCTION
Democratic government can be parliamentary or presidential. The difference between these two
forms of governments depends upon the relationship between the executive and legislative organs of
the government. If the executive and legislature are unified and controlled under the control of same
persons, so that there is assurance of harmony between these two branches and also the executive is
responsible to the legislative body for his policies and actions, such a system is parliamentary . If the
executive and legislature are separate and the executive is not responsible to the legislature, it is
called presidential form of government.
In parliamentary form of government, the head of the state and the head of the government are ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In this way, it is ensured that the government is, at all times, conscious of fulfilling its
responsibilities and promises regarding general welfare of the public without fail because failure to
do so will affect the electoral prospects of the government in the next elections. There is flexibility
in the parliamentary system as it is highly adaptive to changing situations. For instance, if there is
situation of emergency the leadership could be changed without any kind of hassle. As in England it
happened during World War II when Mr. Chamberlain had step down for Mr. Winston Churchil to
handle the war. Moreover, the elections can be deferred till normalcy is restored. Such flexibility can
only be seen in the parliamentary system whereas there is no flexibility in the Presidential system
which is a highly rigid system.
Another important characteristic of this system is swiftness in decision – making and policy
formulations for the purpose of governance of the country as pointed out by Lord

Thomas Hobbes : The Best Form Of Government
The philosopher, Thomas Hobbes, started out on with philosophy of political science while on his
trips and visits to other countries outside of England to listen to other scientists and learn different
forms of government. While studying, Thomas Hobbes wondered about why people were allowing
themselves to be ruled and what would a great form of government for England. He reasoned that
people were naturally wicked and shouldn't be trusted to govern themselves because they were
selfish creatures and would do anything to better their position and social status. These people, when
left alone will go back to their evil impulses to get a better advantage over others. So Thomas
Hobbes concluded that the best form of government would an absolute monarchy, which is a
government which gives all power to the king or queen to provide direction and leadership to make
sure the country doesn't go into turmoil.
To support his ideas, Thomas Hobbes asked the question," If men are naturally in a state of war, why
are they carrying arms and need keys to lock their doors." In other words, even when the country is
at peace, people are still using things which can get them a better advantage over others and keeping
their own interests a secret from others. According to Thomas Hobbes, the reason that this is the
case is because people are selfish and evil and that they must protect their interests really well by
using certain tactics to make sure other people devastate their needs and wants. Also,

Analysis Of The Article ' Corporations Versus The Market,...
Introduction
In the article "Corporations versus the Market; or, Whip Conflation Now," Roderick T. Long argues
that, there is a misconception between both the defenders of the free market and the critics of
libertarianism. To explain, those who believe in the misconception think that the libertarian society
is aligned with the capitalism society. However, this misconception prevents them from observing
how corporations pervert and twist a natural free market. Ultimately, he argues that there can only
exist an antithetical relationship between free markets and corporate power when libertarianism
advocacy is not misperceived or is correctly perceived as pro–corporate apologetics.
Roderick T. Long claims that the Wal–Mart Corporation is receiving direct beneficiary through
government intervention. He claims the reasons behind his assumption is due to the fact that Wal–
Mart uses the tax–funded highway system and provides low prices to its consumers while its
employees receive minimum wage. I argue that Long is being extremely abstract on the examples he
has provided in which case, he provides poor and insufficient evidence behind the government's
involvement with Wal–Mart's corporation. In other words, Long's reasons tie a poor connection of
Wal–Mart having government intervention.
Summary
Roderick argues that corporate power and the free market are actually antithetical and explains that
big businesses fear genuine competition. He explains that competition exercises downward

Compare And Contrast The Four Forms Of Greek Government
Introduction This assignment describes the character of the four ancient governments in order to
compare and contrast the five government forms in the Ancient Greek city–states. They are
monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy.
Monarchy A monarchy is a form of government in which the ruling power is in the hands of a single
person. Monarchy comes from the Greek terms monos and arkhein. It is a form of in which the
people are led by a king, usually with the help of a council of advisors. He takes power legally and
his sovereignty hereditary. The ruler is empowered to remain in power for life. One citystate whose
government was a monarchy was the city–state of Corinth. Aristocracy ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
A form of government very similar to monarchy, Tyrannies usually grew out of oligarchies. The
word tyranny comes from the Greek word tyrannos (usurper with supreme power). Many states,
particularly in the 6th century BC, were ruled by a tyrant. It first appeared in Argos or Corinth, then
Sicyon, Megara, Mytilene and Miletus. However, A tyrant usually doesn't pass power to his son, and
despite common stereotypes, not all tyrants were bad leaders. Oligarchy An oligarchy is a form of
government in which the ruling power is in the hands of a few leaders. The word oligarchy comes
from the Greek terms oligos (few) and arkhein (rule). These "few" are rich, powerful or both, and
are usually nobles, aristocrats, military groups or any distinguished group that rules tyrannically
with their own interests at heart. Thus it did not benefit the mass population. It is highly championed
by the Spartan government. In Sparta the Spartan who rose through the ranks and eventually serve
as Ephor and Gerousia or is a direct descendant of the royal family Agiads and the Eurypontids get
together to

Analysis Of The Article ' Corporations Versus The Market,...
In the article "Corporations versus the Market; or, Whip Conflation Now," Roderick T. Long argues
that, there is a misconception between both the defenders of the free market and the critics of
libertarianism. To explain, those who believe in the misconception think that the libertarian society
is aligned with the capitalist society. However, this misconception prevents them from observing
how corporations pervert and twist a natural free market. Ultimately, he argues that there can only
exist an antithetical relationship between free markets and corporate power when libertarianism
advocacy is not misperceived or is correctly perceived as pro–corporate apologetics.
Roderick T. Long claims that the Wal–Mart Corporation is receiving direct beneficiary through
government intervention. He claims the reasons behind his assumption is due to the fact that Wal–
Mart uses the tax–funded highway system and provides low prices to its consumers while its
employees receive minimum wage. I argue that Long is being extremely abstract on the examples he
has provided in which case, he provides poor and insufficient evidence behind the government's
involvement with Wal–Mart's corporation. In other words, Long's reasons tie a poor connection of
Wal–Mart having government intervention.
Summary
Roderick argues that corporate power and the free market are actually antithetical and explains that
big businesses fear genuine competition. He explains that competition exercises downward pressure
on

Democracy Is A Form Of Government
In 1787, when the Constitution was being written, the people of the United States decided they
wanted a democratic form of government. A democracy is "a form of government in which the
people rule themselves either directly or through freely elected representatives" (American
Government & Politics, pg. 5). Furthermore, a democracy is broken down into two more forms: a
direct democracy and a representative democracy (also can be considered a republic). A direct
democracy is a form of government, originally founded in ancient Greece, in which the people
directly pass laws and make other key decisions. A representative democracy is a form of
government in which the people choose their leaders through free elections in which candidates ...
According to Federalist #10, a majority faction is when the majority of the people brought together
by a common passion or interest adverse to the rights of other citizens or to the permanent and
aggregate interests of the community. A direct democracy simply cannot can't solve the problem of
faction because the majority can simply have whatever way they want. It's too easy to get want they
want. History has shown that majority faction is a real thing. An example is slavery. The African
Americans were the minority so people took advantage of them and used them for their work. The
majority of the people wanted to use them as slaves so that's what happened. Even though slavery
was abolished, it took a lot of work and has forever changed how we view ourselves and our past.
These are two examples of why a direct democracy wouldn't have been a good form of government.
But James Madison does suggest a representative democracy or republic would be a good form of
government for the United States. A representative democracy is also known as a republic and a
republic is where the people rule themselves through elected representatives (American Government
& Politics, pg. 7). The first reason why a republican or representative democracy form of
government is better for the United States is that it could, "refine and enlarge the public views, by
passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens, whose wisdom may best discern the

Best Form Of Government
Democracy is the type of government that is used in the United States, however, this doesn't mean it
is the best type of government. In fact, some may say it is the worst form. Democracy is defined by
many concepts, some of which are logical, and others that need to be revised. Democracy has many
solid concepts that make it a good form of government. One concept is the idea that everyone has
some fundamental worth. This concept explains that everyone has some amount, big or small, of
worth and dignity. This is important because if people felt like they didn't have any worth or dignity,
they would not contribute to society and they would overall be very unhappy. Another logical
concept is the idea of equality among all people in regards of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For example, one of democracy's most important concepts is the belief in majority rule. This is the
idea that the majority of people are right more often than they are wrong, and they are right more
often than any single person is. This concept is also contradictory to democracy's focus on
individuality. With the system of majority rule, whatever the majority says goes. This can be
problematic, especially when two sides are voting and one side wins by a very small percentage. For
example, if the people are voting on whether or not guns should be banned, and one side wins 51%
to 49%, that means that close to half of the people are going to be upset with the outcome. Also,
who is to say that this was the right answer? Another problem with the democratic system is that
voting can turn into a popularity contest. This can be seen with the latest election. Before the
presidential campaigns began, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton were names that your average
American would most likely recognize. Many people voted for these candidates simply because they
knew the name, not based on how qualified they were. This is not fair because it is likely that there
was a different candidate that was more qualified for the position. Also, democracies believe in the
concept of equal opportunity, but in reality, the concept doesn't always exist. This concept says that
anybody is allowed to run for president, but if

Compare And Contrast The Pros And Cons Of Democracy As A...
As diverse as states were in ancient Greece, their forms of government evolved along with them.
States like Sparta kept oligarchic form of government for the most of its history, while Athens
changed from somewhat monarchic state what we know as democracy today. So it's worth
examining each form of government in order to better understand their pros and cons.
MONARCHY: Monarchy can be defined as "political system based upon the undivided sovereignty
or rule of a single person." (Kostiner, par. 1, 2016) While monarchies weren't most popular forms of
government in the Ancient Greece, some states like Athens still went through this transformation
before becoming a democratic state. Yet, there were states where power was in hands of only a
single individual who worked alongside other governmental bodies to run the country. "The most
famous monarchies were those in the states of Macedonia and Epeiros, where the ruler shared power
with an assembly, limited though these were in practice." (Catwright, 2013). Nowadays, we
commonly refer to UK or Sweden as a monarchy since those countries have kings and queens.
However, they are very different monarchies compared to those in Ancient Greece. OLIGARCHY:
Oligarchy can be defined as "government by the few, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I believe it's reasonable to argue that most of the Greek states, at some point, had a small privileged
group of people running the state with a focus on selfish purposes. However, it was rather hard for
those individuals to sustain the power. Even Sparta, that was run by a few kings and the Ephors still
can't be fully considered an oligarchy since all of the rulers focused on decisions in best interests of
the state, not themselves. Overall, oligarchic forms of government seems to be more applicable in
extremely corrupt and unregulated states. Yet, most of the states in Ancient Greece had some form
of regulation and control over its

Government In Rousseau As A Form Of Government
In Rousseau's social contract, the people must submit some of their individual wills to the collective
or general will, created through the agreement with the other free and equal people of society. This
implies a direct democracy as Rousseau's form of government. The general will depends on the
coming together of the entire democratic body to collectively decide what laws to create. The
problem with his social contract is, in order for the general will to continue; to keep up with
changing societal beliefs, the individual people of society must be able to come together regularly.
Therefore this form of social contract would only be possible in small states where they can come
together regularly, and they must live in similar geographical circumstances, as to be able to unite
under common laws, otherwise, it is not a realistic form of government. This direct democracy
would also mean that the people would have to be able to let go of their individual identities to
create laws that will benefit the good of everyone. This would require for everyone in society not to
think selfishly, which is just not realistic. Therefore, if a governing body cannot even be formed, if
people cannot all agree to the general will, then the government is essentially failed, and therefore,
cannot be legitimate. Although Rousseau claims that the government must exercise executive power
in order as these responsibilities consist of "particular acts which fall outside the competency of the
law, and

A Parliamentary Government Is A Form Of Government
A parliamentary government is a form of government that consists of two different systems. The
legislative system and the executive. The supremacy of the legislative government has been replaced
with a cabinet and has since been called a cabinet government. A parliamentary system has a head of
state, also known as the president in some countries. According to Shively, 2014, the president or
head of state is merely symbolic and only carries out ceremonial functions and has no governmental
control.
Description of India's Parliament
Indian Parliament is the highest legislative body of India. The parliament is comprised of the
President and two houses. The first house, is the Rajya Sabha the Council of States. It is also called
the upper house. The second house is Lok Sabha, the House of the People, or the lower house. The
Rajya Sabha is a permanent house and cannot be dissolved. There is a maximum of two–hundred
and fifty seats in the Council of State. There are two–hundred and thirty–eight members, all of
which are elected members and representatives of each state and two union territories. The other
twelve are members who have been nominated by the president. Each council member serves a
maximum of six years (Shubhangi, 2017). According to Shively, 2014, the president is directly
elected by the electoral college consisting of the members of both houses of Parliament plus the
members of the state legislature. He/she is able to call a meeting between the two houses when

Best Form Of Government
Out of all of the forms of government, the best form of government is a democracy. It is the best
because the leader is elected by the people, the people have rights, and laws are voted on by the
people. The first reason that democracies are the best form of government is because of the leaders.
Take the United States of America for instance. The President is elected for a 4 year term unless he
is re–elected for another term with a two term limit. The President is elected by the people of
America by voting on the candidate that they want to be the President.
The second reason that democracies are the best form of government is because of the rights that the
people get. Some rights in the United States of America include the

Forms of Government Essay
Many different forms of government have existed throughout civilization. Theocracy, dictatorships,
democracy, and many others have all had periods of time where they reigned as the government of
choice. Arguments could be made in favor of each form of government. The key to finding the most
viable form of government is to consider this: which form of government provides the most stability
for the state? The stability of the state is based upon the foundation of the government. Shaky
foundations lead to short–lived or miserable nations. Governments based upon religion, birthrights,
or one man generally do not have solid foundations. The greatest foundation a government can have
is the support of its citizens. Governments which cater to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The two dominant forms of government are democracy and authoritarianism. The two socio–
economic policies are capitalism and communism. Democracy is a form of government which
dominates the western world. In democracy, every person is given equal input into matters of the
state, although this does happen to varying degrees. There exist many different types of democracy.
Absolute or direct democracy occurs when each citizen personally participates in all decision–
making processes. This system is difficult to maintain due to the vast number of people and the
necessity for all people to be informed, logical, and educated when making many decisions. This
form of democracy has not existed in significant sized populations. Representative democracy is a
type of government in which the people elect government officials to make decisions concerning the
state. The two most prevalent types of representative democracy are democratic republics and
parliamentary democracies. In a democratic republic, such as the United States or Canada, the
people elect both their representatives in government and their head of state. In a parliamentary
democracy, such as the United Kingdom or Australia, the people elect their representatives and their
representatives elect their head of state. Authoritarianism is a form of government in which the
leader or leaders have exclusive power concerning matters of the state. Although these

Disadvantages Of Government
A perfect functioning government is something that societies have been trying to achieve for
thousands of years. Throughout time, different types of government have implemented such as
monarchies, aristocracies, and democracies. Each type has its strengths and weaknesses and
although each type has been altered over time, the original principle remains. Cicero and Hobbes
state the pros and cons of different as well as state the role of government on society and the role of
society under government. A monarchy is when all direction depends on one person who is called a
king. A aristocracy is when the power is in the hands of the privileged delegates who rule over the
State. Finally, a democracy is when the people are all in all, or ruled under a popular constitution.
These systems are used to figure out what the correct definition of a commonwealth is, why it has
been necessary historically, and how it can best be implemented. The first idea that has to be
discussed is; what actually is a commonwealth?" This is basically the ideal form of government that
would function perfectly in a utopian society. Cicero describes this as, "...a commonwealth is a
constitution of the entire people." (Cicero XXV). Cicero is saying that a commonwealth is a
decision of the entire people, where everyone has an equal voice as to what happens to them under
the rule of the government. According to Hobbes, "This done, the multitude so united in one person
is called a commonwealth..."

Totalitarianism : A Totalitarian State, Public And Private...
Totalitarianism is a political system in which the government has the authority to regulate every
aspect of public and private behavior. Since totalitarianism is based off of a specific ideology, every
totalitarian government or group can be different from each other. There is no single established
definition for the term, however all definitions of totalitarianism contain commonalities. New World
Encyclopedia states that these commonalities include getting a mass population to follow a specific
ideology, instituting control, and setting up repercussions for those who go against the totalitarian
state. By defining totalitarianism, it displays the difference from a democracy and the similarities to
the government of North Korea. (Totalitarianism).
Totalitarianism is a means of total control. Under a totalitarian state, public and private behavior is
regulated and there is an attempt to mold individuals into the desired type (Totalitarianism). There is
no choice in this type of political system, all decisions are predetermined by the main force. Michael
Kleen states in his study that "Totalitarianism is therefore not specifically a system of government,
but a way of organizing society by means of a powerful, centralized state" (Kleen). Things needed to
maintain this type of modern state include mass media, education, and political culture. The key
component to a functioning totalitarian state is access to this control. Kleen reiterates that
"Totalitarian goal is not just

St. Thomas Aquinas : Tyranny : The Worst Form Of Government
In St. Thomas Aquinas' discussion on the various forms of government, he came to the conclusion
that others before him have; tyranny is by far the worst form of government. He also agreed that
monarchy was the best possible form. However, unlike his predecessors, he did not believe that a
monarchy held the greatest risk of tyranny, instead pointing to the rule by the many or by the few.
Overall, Aquinas' view on tyrants and dealing with tyrannical rule is flawed in terms of what type of
government is endangered, how the populace should respond, and how the tyrant should ultimately
be dealt with. He begins the discussion by bringing up the common good, a goal every proper
government should be striving for. Aquinas is an advocate for the monarchy, not only because it is
deemed to be the best form of government, but because it also does not hold the risk of tyranny as
others believe. In this he states that "When many people are exercising rule and one of them ...
[ignores] the common good, there is danger of strife among their subjects because dissension among
the rulers leads to general dissension", which brings up his original statement that the rule of the
many is less favorable than the rule of the one (22). Aquinas favors this form of government due to
the lack of dissension among the rulers, but by giving one person all that power the ruler would be
able to enact any law and state it is for the common good. Should a monarch follow Aquinas' logic,
the monarch would

Democracy As A Form Of Government
"Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains." ("The Social Contract Book 1"1) These chains
symbolize the constant pulls and ties the people have in their every day life. The chains can
symbolize: taxes, education, healthcare, democracy, social norms, and political authority. The chains
can symbolize anything that makes man more obedient to the state rather than himself. Rousseau
opens his book with the question if there is such thing as a legitimate political authority that will
work for everyone in the society or if there really is no such thing. Democracy as a form of
government has many different definitions for the philosophers but I found that the common theme
of the definition of democracy is the people; the body politic.
Aristotle states his theory as democracy as a deviant constitution; Rousseau's democracy refers to a
social contract between the people and their rulers, James Cairns and Alan Sears explain democracy
as disrupting everyday reality and developing new practices of popular power, and lastly Ranciere,
Ranciere describes democracy as, "the reality of the power of the people that can never coincide
with the form of a State." These four political theorists all agree, democracy would not exist without
the people. Through Aristotle, Rousseau, James Cairns and Alan Sears, and Ranciere I will explain
what democracy is and the values and virtues essential to democracy as a form of government and
as a practice.
Aristotle gives his definition of

Form Of Government In The 17th And 18th Century
For over 5,000 years of human civilization, there has always been a need for societal structure and
stability. People developed governments in order to guarantee that structure and stability are present
within the region. While there are various forms of government, some are more effective than
others. Yet the effectiveness of that form of government is mostly dictated by the time period it is
being used in. Even though democracy is widely regarded as the best form of government in the 21st
century, the same cannot be said for the 17th and 18th centuries. The most effective form of
government for the 17th and 18th centuries in Europe is absolutism because of the power of
religious unity, the importance of fear, and the focus of the overall well–being of the state.
Where democracy falls short is in the power of religious unity. Democracy promotes secular values
which would have been extremely unsuccessful at the time while the very foundation of absolutism
is based on a religious concept called the theory of The Divine Right of Kings. As explained by
King James I of England in 1609, the theory of The Divine Right of Kings states that "for kings are
not only God's lieutenants upon Earth, and sit upon God's throne, but even by God himself they are
called gods." The theory explains that the King was sent from God and is accountable to nobody but
God. This connection between religion and policy allows for unanimous agreement for any course
of action. In the 17th and 18th

Comparing Mill's Representative Government and Locke's...
Even though academic study has frequently engaged with the question as to what form of
government is ideal and what should be the goal of the government , there cannot be one absolute
answer to this question , not merely because there has been no consensus among the scholarly
community but because these questions cannot be detached from the polities which will bear the
implications of the answer. Hence , it is pertinent that they must be looked at in a particular context.
Mill argues for a representative government where sovereignty is vested in the aggregate of the
community while Locke advocates majoritarian rule where legislative is supreme, though he
prescribes certain limitations on it, and is coupled with a powerful executive. At the ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
This , I believe will rob people of their right to decide for themselves what values they want to
pursue and be in opposition with individual liberty, which Mill itself is a proponent . Hence, the
government will work towards a predetermined goal but the way to go about it might result in
promoting certain framework or ideologies which would result in the production of a homogenous
people. Critics say that it gives the state unnecessary power and people must have a right to a
democratic say in their government, even if their exercising of such rights leads to worse outcomes
than might have been obtained. But it is often refuted that since the government will be truly
representative, and people must have wisely chosen good representatives , all the policies that they
advocate will be justified and supported. If we only talk public space this argument holds strong
ground , but to improve the masses the government might have to step upon the private sphere of
society which will inhibit individualism and might entice averse reactions. The state may even step
outside its mandate and make give directions to other institutions like the education or healthcare
systems which are privately administered , so that they follow a certain framework which the state
thinks will better the people. The danger in this is that it might result in

Different Forms Of Government Treat Their Citizens
The amount of power that a government should have within a country has been argued throughout
history. A mutualistic relationship between a government and its people is clear in almost every
society in the world, yet, the dominance one entity has over the other varies from case to case. The
United States' foundation is based upon the fact that the Government works for the people in which
actual citizens take part in maintaining a fair, unified authority, but this modern democracy has
many pros and cons and is still not agreeably the best form of government. People's opinions differ
on how much say any given person should have on the decisions his or her county makes and the
relationship a government should have with its people is very ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The most shocking part of the novel in which doublethink is implemented is when the Party
suddenly announces that Oceania is at war with Eastasia and no longer Eurasia. The part that is
shocking is that once the announcement is made about the change of countries, the people
unquestionably change their previous hate towards Eastasia and immediately despise their once
allies Eurasia. The unconditioned trust in the government truly shows how brainwashed the
population is, and because of this trust the society is able to function successfully. The true
patriotism of the citizens facilitates a lack of anguish over the harsh injustices from the government;
everyone in Oceania is content with a brutal lifestyle and none dare to revolt against The Party.
Winston shares how society functions successfully behind such a corrupt government when he says,
"In a way, the world−view of the Party imposed itself most successfully on people incapable of
understanding it"... "By lack of understanding they remained sane. They simply swallowed
everything, and what they swallowed did them no harm, because it left no residue behind" (Orwell).
Since the decisions that are made in society are done completely by the government, the citizens of
Oceania have to absorb whatever the Party announces as fact. With no thoughts about how life could
become better the people coexist in a habitat in which they truly believe could not be improved. All
injustice and conflict is diminished once people

The Different Forms Of Government, Friendship, Trust, And...
Within Aquinas' political writings, he shows us the six different forms of government and the reason
why some are better than others. Government was created not just for organization but so people can
come together to form a community. A community works best when the governing only want well–
being for the governed. Aquinas not only compares the different forms of government by showing
their benefits and drawbacks, but also argues about the supremacy of a monarchy, and how it's the
best form of government. The purpose of government is to look out for the well being of the
community so that it can keep all the basic values of human nature like religion, friendship, trust,
and prosperity. Aquinas states that government is to serve the people while taking into account peace
and unity because "the good and wellbeing of a community united in fellowship lies in the
preservation of its unity" (p 10). He explains that without fellowship there can be no unity and that
we can find fellowship through trust and well–being. Peace gives community a sense of harmony
through nonviolence and the freedom from war. We find that government can be broken down into
six different regimes, each having a different way of ruling and a different objective. Each are
different in ways yet some worse than others. Aquinas describes each regime with a certain sense of
reality and gives us an idea of what the rulers are like within each government.
There are six forms of government; all compose of

Zander Form Of Government
Zander is a midsized country composed of about thirty million people with approximately one
hundred fifty thousand square miles of land. The country is a moderately developed country with
little farming within the state. The state of Zander will be a land dedicated to the prosperity and
wellbeing of its people. The government shall be composed of unicameral legislature and an
executive branch. Having only two main bodies within the federal government will allow for a faster
response to pertinent issues. The form of the government will be a constitutional republic. The
legislature will be a senate composed of one hundred elected senators; four from each of the twenty–
five districts across the state. Each district will elect one new senator ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Every citizen will have the basic right to be treated fairly and equally without discrimination. To be
a citizen a person must have be born in Zander while their parents are residents of Zander or have
lived in Zander for five years and applied for citizenship. Citizens will have the right to religion,
press and land. They will have the liberties of free speech, privacy, the right to vote, the right to
marry and the right to pursue their dreams. Zander will follow a Capitalistic ideology to promote
competition and increase growth, but withholds the right to interfere if a corporation starts to
become detrimental to the citizen of Zander. To vote a person must have completed high school or
achieved an equivalent or greater education. The people will also have the right to own weapons, but
must maintain an education in gun safety and basic marksmanship. Parties for elections will be
allowed and will not be intervened by the government. This will allow for the building of ideas.
These rights and liberties will protect the people Zander from its own government and ensure their
freedom. Travel to other districts within the state will be unhindered to allow for easier trade and
growth within the

Forms Of Limited Government
There are many types of modern and historic governments. The form of government a nation has is
influenced by their past government and the specific circumstances in the country. There are many
variations of essentially similar forms of government. All forms of government can be simplified
into a classification as either limited or unlimited. Limited government is regulated by a constitution
and a functioning legal system. This places restrictions on the nation's leaders and limits their power.
One of the characteristics of a limited government is that the leaders are chosen in free and fair
elections. Because of the restrictions on a limited government, the citizens in these countries tend to
have more rights and liberties. Unlimited government happens when a single person, or a small
group controls power. Unlimited governments retain power by controlling virtually every aspect of
the country. Their rule is often by force with little say by citizens. If elections occur, they are
controlled, not fair, and the outcome may be predetermined. Unlimited governments do not abide by
constitutions, if they exist, or leaders change them to suit their needs. A survey of governments
shows that most unlimited governments come to an end because of civil unrest. This can be seen in
the historical government of East Germany, also known as the German Democratic Republic. The
use of the word "democratic" in this countries' name is something of a farce. In reality, the country
operated under a communist model, similar to the Soviet Union. This was an unlimited government,
which did not have free elections and the leaders having consolidated control of everything. The
government essentially planned the economy, which lead to food shortages. Even basic necessities
were rationed to the extreme. Despite these shortcomings, East Germany had the strongest economy
of all communist countries. Their output was centered on industrial production of a variety of goods.
Like other communist countries, since the government owned most of the capital, it controlled the
wealth created. The citizens existed just above sustenance. The strong military played a vital role in
defining and keeping the government in

Aquinas' view of kingship and the Aristotelian response....
St. Thomas Aquinas takes many of Aristotle 's ideas from The Politics in order to create his idea of
the best regime. He revisits the good and bad forms of each type of government Aristotle introduced,
and then makes his decision that the best regime is a type of monarchy that he calls kingship. This
decision stems from his definition of a king as "one who rules over the people of a city or province
for the common good" (17).
Kingship is beneficial because it is the rule of one person. Aquinas states that the correct and most
useful way to carry out an objective is "when it is lead to its appropriate end" (15). The incorrect
way would be the opposite––to lead something to an inappropriate end, or not to lead it to an end at
all. In light ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He, however, believes that kingship is so important, that a slight change of the type of monarchy
would not be that bad. This is interesting, because Aquinas also says that tyranny is the "worst form
of government" (18) because it seeks only the good of the tyrant, and is therefore further from the
appropriate end of government, which is the common good and unity. The reasons Aquinas seems to
change his mind about the idea of tyranny seem

Religion Is A Form Of Government
"Democracy is a form of government, where a constitution guarantees basic personal and political
rights, fair and free elections, and independent courts of law." (Democracy 2004). Religion and
politics have been long viewed as partners for many and yet some find the relationship a struggle.
Religion usually pertains to an individual or a community of like minded members in the private
sector. An example of such a body of individuals includes church or social organizations. As part of
Western civilization, Americans typically embraced the separation of church and state as they
believe that religion has no place in politics at all. Politics usually apply to the public sector where
individuals serve as members of a wider community such as ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
How do they impact each other?
According to Wikipedia 2014, "Religion is an organized collection of beliefs, cultural systems, and
world views that relate humanity to an order of existence. It is also the most intensive and
comprehensive method of valuing that is experienced by humankind". Religion is often difficult to
identify or define because it overlaps on many different boundaries in human experience. This
complex phenomenon has led many theorists to attempt to form a cohesive definition, however,
every theory has its limitations thus making this task utterly impossible to complete. Religion can
also resolve matters on the private and public sector such as issues regarding life and death, love and
sex, authority and freedom. Although religious traditions often challenge each other, they also offer
individuals with a sense of security and direction. It can also dictate those who are in power versus
those who are not, and often provides validation for imbalances in social, economic, and political
power, as well as structure for advancement and revolutionary change.
According to Fairlax 2014, "Politics is the art or science of government or governing, especially the
governing of a political entity, such as a nation, and the administration and control of its internal and
external affairs", the debate or conflict among individuals or parties having or hoping to

Government : Forms Of Government Essay
Forms of Government
Nigeria is a federal republic, with a presidential system of government which includes the three
arms of government namely the executive, legislative, judiciary.
The executive arm of government is found at both the federal and state level. The federal level
consist of the president, the vice president and members of the executive council. At the state level,
the executive arm consists of the governor, deputy governor and members of the executive council.
The main function of the executive arm of government is to implement laws made by the legislature,
maintenance of law through the police department etc.
The legislative arm of government is found both at the federal and state levels. The legislative arm
of government at the federal level comprises of 109 senate member and 360 house of representative
members elected from different states in the country but the president, deputy president, speaker and
deputy speaker. The two house combined together makes up the Bicameral national assembly of the
federation of Nigeria. At the state level the legislative arm is known as the house of assembly. The
legislative arm has the power to make enact laws for the peace, order and good government of the
federation of Nigeria. Laws made by the national assembly takes precedence over laws made by the
house of assembly.
The judiciary arm of government interprets the law and adjudicates if conflicts arises between the
executive and legislature. It carries its function

Comparing Monarchy And Democracy In Ancient Greece
Introduction
The ancient Greece consisted of over 1000 poleis (Cartwright, 2013). Each polis was sovereign
community and operated as a state. This variety of city–states in the ancient Greece made it possible
for a range of governmental systems to form, while allowing people to experiment with various
types of political structures. In this essay, we will study the similarities and the differences between
some of these types of government such as monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy, and
democracy. Discussion
Monarchy or 'Rule by one' is a system of government in which the city–state is ruled by one king.
The power is entirely his and the claim to this power is inherited. In monarchies, the king has the
last say in any matter and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Tyrannies and Monarchies generally depend on the actions of one person at the top, while the power
is shared by Oligarchies and Aristocracies the power is shared among a few and the rest of the
citizens are excluded. There are elements of heredity in Aristocracies that is similar to that of a
Monarchies; Aristocracies is somewhat dependent on the wealth and the family history which is
passed to an Aristocrat.
Differences
A Democracy in Ancient Greece would allow for the majority rule while a tyranny and Monarchy,
or Aristocracy wouldn't. A democracy had to go through a far slower process of change due to
participations of the masses, while other forms of government could go through changes far faster,
simply because the number of rulers and decision makers were limited.
Conclusion
As we saw, the line between different forms of government in the ancient Greece could get blurry
and it wasn't always the case that one form of government necessarily guaranteed the interests of the
masses. The common theme in all of these political battles was the present of strong and privileged
groups who by law or force exercised power. However, from all that political experiments,
democracy emerges; although not perfect, but that first attempt at getting it right paved the way for
future reforms and improvements that affected the sociopolitical lives of many democratic nations,

A Republic Form Of Government
A republic form of government and a democracy affects the role of the criminal justice administrator
the following ways. While we consider the country and what we have as a democracy, we do not
have a democratic form of government. We have a republic form of government. If everything was
democratic, there would be no laws to enforce. Everyone would have free reign to do whatever they
want and in that instance, our country would be very chaotic. If I did not want to stop for a stop light
or a stop sign and proceed through, then I could. This would make it very difficult for a criminal
justice administrator because there would be no need to have a criminal justice agency. However,
with the republic form of government that we are, laws are made.

Best Form Of Government In Lord Of The Flys
What is the Best Type of Government? Monarchy, Democracy, And Anarchy are the three main
forms of government the schoolboys used in Lord of the Flys. What are their strengths? What are
their weaknesses, And why is that type of Government the best? The best type of government is
Monarchy, as there is the rule of one, everything he says gets done.
Democracy is only good if everyone does their part, which the schoolboys do not. Anarchy has no
rules, and that's chaotic. Over time Monarchy prove to be the best form of Government for the
Schoolboys. Democracy fails to be the best form of government for the schoolboys. At the start of
the story, the boys had no rules at all. They were separated and mostly alone. Then Ralph found the
conch ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Anarchy proves to be the worst, most unorganized, most chaotic, and absurd form of government
out of all for the schoolboys. Anarchy has killing and hunting, and breaking things up. Some of
Piggy's last words are some of the most important ones in the text. Piggy said
"Which is better, law and rescue, or hunting and breaking things up." (p180). Piggy is yelling at the
savage boys using the anarchy form of government. By Anarchy comes hunger for power.
Roger is becoming Jack, Jack is becoming Ralph, Ralph is becoming Savage. Eventually Roger will
become the chief and Jack will soon be in Ralph's spot if it continued. However thankfully the
officer came and saved the boys from going any further. Anarchy is a terrible form of government
and probably in general the worst type of government. Is the best form of government Monarchy?
Monarchy proves to be the best forn of government followed by democracy, and then Anarchy. The
rule of one, the mind of one, and the rule of many is what monarchy is and the fact that Monarchy
got the most done is why it proves to be the best form of government, for the schoolboys. Monarchy
proves to be the

Tyranny In Ancient Greece
Monarchy: means the government of a person. In the context of ancient Greece it was hereditary and
the power was exercised by a king, a Polis whose government was a monarchy was the city–state of
Corinth. The power was recognized and had been taken in a legal manner. In ancient Greece this
form of government was rare and was distinguished from tyranny by the benevolence of the
hereditary ruler (Cartwright, 2018). Tyranny: means power to a Lord, the Tyrant. This definition has
a negative value and in ancient Athens was considered an abuse and the fear of a tyrant reinforced
the desire for democratic forms of government. It is a government very similar to the monarchy,
with a negative meaning of the term, in fact a tyrant does not take power

The Form Of Government In Bangladesh
Government is the most important one among the elements of a state. Without a government, a state
cannot be formed. The government may be changeable and can be formed in different types. In the
world, the government varies from state to state. The thinkers have argued the classification in a
different way at different times. Lots of discussions have been taken part over the form of
governments. They mainly focused on that which form is the best one among all the forms of
government. Every form of government is different from another. As a consequence, it is very
difficult to pin down the single factor that most closely ties to "goodness." The form of government's
values may determine its agreeability to a particular individual or group. On the contrary, its
corruptibility determines how likely it is to adhere to those values in the real world when subjects to
the rigor of human nature.
Government History And System Of Bangladesh:
Political governance in Bangladesh began with the independence from Pakistan in 1971. In 1971,
there was a government which was formed to lead throughout the war and it was the "Mujibnagar
Government". After the declaration of independence on 26 March 1971,Mujibnagar Government
was constituted at Mujibnagar to conduct the Bangladesh war of liberation. It was formed on 10
April 1971 . The Mujibnagar government was headed by Tajuddin Ahmad. Mujibnagar government
was mainly formed consisting of the top ranking leaders of awami league.On 26

Examples Of Dystopia In The Maze Runner
If a society is somehow all content and happy with the way things are, then most modern day
problems would be solved. If there were some way to achieve this dream of a community, political
conflict would become a thing of the past. The desired goal is a utopian society. A utopia is a place
or stat gcxhe of order in which everything is perfect. The more that we fight for this dream, the more
apparent it becomes that such a society is impossible. When government tries to create a utopia, the
image of a perfect life could evolve. The result of this could be a dystopia. A dystopia is when the
opposite of a utopia is established when trying to create a utopia. In The Maze Runner, a group of
teenage boys are trapped in the center of one giant maze. An exemplary dystopian effect is given
within the book when one of the boys states: "If you ain't scared, you ain't human"(Dashner 9). The
author really helps the reader engage in how it really felt to be trapped and scared. No matter ...
They both centralize the power in one area and do not let the people have rights or a say in what is
going on. When a dystopia occurs, it is usually due to unequal distribution of power. When too
much power is put in the wrong hands, the society could spin out of control like a car on the
highway. A utopia is not realistic goal to have for any type of government. The best thing that a
government can do is to avoid becoming a dystopia. It all comes down to who has the power and
what they are doing with it. If the government has too much power, the people might rebel. The
result would be a dystopia. But if the people have too much power, there would not be enough order,
also leading to a dystopia. This scale needs to be balanced to where the government and the people
have just the right amount of power to keep the system in order. With so many flaws, the utopian
dream could result in a dystopian

What Form Of Government Would I Choose?
What Form of Government Would I Choose?
How can anyone honestly say this is a form of Government I want? Throughout history, there have
been many types of governments. How will mine be any different? Since the time of Adam and Eve
being kicked out the Garden of Eden, man's struggle to establish order, safety, and justice not only
for himself, but his neighbor, as well. Also since about that time, some men have been forcing their
will upon others. How do you choose a Government style? Let's look at the different types that have
been in place or have been tried.
Communism–Seek to create a classless nation, what does that mean? There will be no upper,
middle, lower class. This is the same practice that used by Russia and China. If Communism ...
Socialism–just as in communism, there is no private ownership. This type of system is a
redistribution of wealth.
Tyranny–A form of government with a single ruler with absolute power.
After reviewing the types of governments how can one decide, which is truly the best to govern by
and to convince everyone to live by? In my view, there is only one. To fully understand we must
travel back in time to November 11th, 1620. This is the date of the signing of the Mayflower
Compact. "....do by these presents solemnly and mutually in the presence of God and one of another,
Covenant and Combine ourselves together in a Civil Body Politic, for our better ordering and
preservation and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by virtue hereof to enact, constitute and
frame such just and equal Laws, Ordinances, Acts, Constitutions and Offices from time to time, as
shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general good of the Colony, unto which we
promise all due submission and obedience." These men understood the importance having to get
together and work out the problems facing the Colony. They had broken away from the Church of
England and want to be free to do what they wanted, practice religion the way they want, but yet
understood they needed to have boundaries and laws to live by. As our Country

The Five Forms Of Government In Ancient Greece
The Greece has tried various types of government, they know how to reform the systems and how to
corrupt, grow, decline. The rule forms in the ancient Greek took extraordinarily diverse forms. This
article will briefly describe the fifth forms of government in ancient Greece. That are monarchy,
aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy.
The first forms of the rule in the ancient Greek is a monarchy. it means the ruling power is in the
hands of a single person, in other words, one person inherits power. This person must be male and
there is not queen.
At the first, the kings were chosen by the people. After death the king, another leader was selected to
take his place. Eventually, the Kings become inherited the power and rule of his children, usually
the eldest son takes the thorn. The king relied on heavily armed soldiers to enforce his rule and to
ensure that the people paid taxes and obeyed his laws. When the king does not have a male, the
military advisers of the king battled among them to become the new monarch. (Duignan, n.d.)
This form of government disappeared in Greece since the fighting between kingdoms in Asia Minor.
This fighting limited the arrival of raw materials to these kingdoms. As a result, they lose their
ability to make weapons and conquer ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Athena has an assembly, group of rich and poor citizens with power to pass the law. It was open to
all but less than of the people attended. They met about 40 times in a year to discus and make the
decision. Assembly members reached all their decision through public debate and vote. A smaller
important executive body, the Council of 500, was responsible for the day–to–day running of the
state. The members of the assembly could lose their rights once they lose their citizenship. The
assembly was the weakest public office in Sparta. (Brand,

Framers Form Of Government
The United States Constitution created a form of government intended to balance government power
and individual rights through checks and balances. A sense of a limited form of government is
created through this principle as the Framers wanted a government that would be effective but not
too powerful. A limited form of government is effective as it may limit what the government may do
but it gives citizens certain rights that cannot be take away. The separation of powers allows duties
and responsibilities of the government to be able to be divided into three co–equal branches:
Legislative, Executive, and Judicial. Each branch has certain powers to check or stop actions of the
other branches. This is similar to a game of American Football shown ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This can be related to the Judicial Branch declaring executive actions unconstitutional or declaring
laws by the Legislative Branch unconstitutional. The point of view of the cartoon's artist resembled
that all three branches of the government have equal and balanced power and have a fair role. The
two teams portraying the legislative and executive branch are being checked by the referees
portraying the judicial branch. The roles of the legislative and executive branch are shown on each
team's players and the referees are seeing holding the U.S. Constitution determining if the play is
fair or in this case, if the acts of each branch are constitutional. The purposes of government may
include protecting individual rights, promoting the common good and providing economic security.
The Founding Fathers did not want to take away these individual liberties and let the leaders gain
too much power, becoming an authoritarian–type government. The 22nd amendment is an example
that limits the power of the Presidency, causing a check to the Executive Branch. The 22nd
amendment restricts the President to only two four year terms in

The Philosophy Of Political Science
Ohlone College The philosopher, Thomas Hobbes, started out with the philosophy of political
science while on his trips and visits neighboring countries outside of England to listen to other
scientists discuss and learn about different forms of government. While studying, Thomas Hobbes
wondered about why people allow themselves to become ruled by the government and would be the
ideal form of government best for England. He answered that questioned by stating that since people
were naturally wicked and shouldn't become trusted to govern themselves because they were selfish
creatures and would do anything to better their position and social status, it would be best to have an
absolute monarchy, which would stop the people when left alone to go back to their own evil
impulse to be led into the right direction and leadership to make sure the country doesn't go into
turmoil. To support this viewpoint, Thomas Hobbes asked the question," If men are naturally in a
state of war, why are they carrying arms and need keys to lock their doors." In other words, even
when the country is at peace, people are still using things which can get them a better advantage
over others and keeping their own interests a secret from others arms to protect their interests and a
lock to lock away their secrets so no one can get to it. According to Thomas Hobbes, the reason that
this is the case is because people are selfish and evil and that they must protect their interests

Essay about Absolutism vs. Constitutional Monarchy
In the upcoming United States Presidential Election it is possible to see a woman become elected as
President. This would be a first for the United States and also for most of the world. Throughout the
world different types of governments have survived, faulted, or have been altered. Many of these
governments came from early European countries. Two of the most popular types of governments to
come from Europe are Constitutional Monarchy and Absolutism. Traces of Constitutional Monarchy
and Absolutism are still seen today in different parts of the world. Constitutional Monarchy and
Absolutism have its roots set in England and France respectively. Much of original regulations that
have been put in place by these governments have ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Much of the English goods were imported from other countries as well. Beginning in the mid
seventeenth century England went through many changes including moving to a commercial and
urbanizing country. The first set of changes occurred as England began producing different types of
goods. Originally England was making thick types of clothes that were made for the colder
weathers. In the late seventeenth century lighter fabrics began to be created. As the change shifted in
clothing construction, goods of other markets began taking over the industry. "A wide range of
English products replaced imports on the English market and began to compete successfully
abroad." This shift to exporting goods instead of importing greatly improved England's economy.
These goods included sugar, glass, pottery, iron, ships, and different typed of mined goods. Instead
of paying to import these goods, England began exporting goods and bringing in a huge amount of
money to the English economy. As the economy began to boom, a change in the way society lived
had also changed. Instead of living in large cities, citizens began moving outward in the urban areas
further away. Although most of the urbanization movement can be contributed to the raise in
population, there were also many other changes that were occurring. Stagecoaches began having
more frequent routes to all of the major cities and also most of the smaller outlying cities.

Fundamental Differences Between Strong Mayor And...

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Lisa Fields

More from Lisa Fields (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Fundamental Differences Between Strong Mayor And...