Group Evaluation Essay

Personal Reflection On Group Work
Personal Reflection
"Group work is a form of voluntary association of members benefiting from cooperative learning that
enhances the total output of the activity than when done individually".
Working in a group can be very difficult at times. Different people with different views may not
always agree which one another. Throughout the various task I played the communicator. I made
sure everyone was on track on what we wanted to do. I also made sure people was okay and
happy in the role they was playing in the group. My group worked together in collecting ideas
from one another and making it into one. My feelings about the group process was a little mix at
first but, at the end I felt like we actually brought it together. Beginning of the group member were
all over the place and had no direction, when we were able to take a breather in just think ideas
started to flow. I felt like that took the communicator to make it happen. By reinsuring the other
group members that everything will go smoothly if we just don't overthink everything. The things
I will have done differently in the group was to use my time wisely. I believe because we were on
a time frame, I tended to rush things just to say okay where done. Also, more support and trust at a
point of time I was kind of second guessing another idea. I feel that you have to have trust in your
group member to make it effective.
Group Dynamics
"Social integration can be seen as a dynamic and structured process in which all
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Evaluation Of Group Work : Evaluation
Evaluation of Group Work
1.Rate your group (not individuals in the group) and share what factors influenced you picking that
number and explain what it would have taken to move you up half a point up the scale.
I would rate our group as a whole with a 9, because we all took this project seriously and wanted
to do a good job. We all put effort into this project, even though we all thought at some point that
the others were doing more work than ourselves, however, we all put in more work than we
thought we did. Overall, I am happy that I chose to be in this group because I feel like we were
able to work together and not be afraid of sharing our opinions and feedback, even with this group
consisting of people who tend to be very opinionated.
2.Rate each individual and share what factors influenced you picking that number and explain what
it would have taken to move you up a half a point up the scale.
I would rate Kathi with a 9. I feel like she did an amazing job with the financial aspect of the
project and did a lot of research into the amounts and grants. She is also one of the main people
responsible for the name of our project. Kathi would also share her knowledge on any of the topics
as well. During the presentation, I feel like she was able to share at least some of the work that she
put into the financial section, although she was rushed because of the time limit.
I would rate Kristynna a 9. She was very passionate about this topic and was the person who had
originally

Post-Group Evaluation Design
Evaluation Design Our evaluation design will be based off of one group pretest post–test design.
Our experimental or treatment group will be all freshmen at Ohio State University (because our
program will be part of the survey class which all freshmen are required to take). For our purposes
we will not have a control group, due to the ethical issues of giving one group the intervention and
administering it to the other. We will also conduct a one year follow–up test to truly test the long
term effectiveness of our intervention. While it would be great to have a control group, ethically we
do not feel it is appropriate to only allow some students have the intervention and others (the control
group) not. Our group evaluation design will use pre and posttests measuring...show more content...
Taking the test once may make the students better at taking the test a second time; therefore
outcomes might reflect this improved capacity. Other limitations in general to our research are related
to the effectiveness of our intervention. The participants' exposure to the intervention is very
brief–just one hour–long seminar in their survey class. This might negatively affect the program's
ability to have any kind of positive long–lasting impact on students. When a freshman student has
eventually made it through college and graduates will they still be using the information they learned
from the seminar? What about post–graduation when the participant is now paying back student
loans?
Possibly an issue regarding validity is that the initial problem presented to us (the counseling office)
was stress and anxiety due to finances. However in our intervention we are measuring students'
financial knowledge and financial self–efficacy. Although we know according to research that
increasing knowledge and self–efficacy will likely decrease stress/anxiety associated with the matter,
we are not directly measuring students'

Racial Out-Group Evaluation
This study was does to determine if sharing a common in–group identity with a racial out–group
member would evoke more positive evaluations and behaviors. The study took place that the
University of Delaware football stadium, where the 183 white participants were attending the
football game against West Chester State University. The participants were asked to complete a brief
interview about their food preferences after either a white or black research assistant approached
them. The interviewers varied systematically with whether they wore University of Delaware hats or
West Chester State University hats, while the rest of their apparel did not represent the university
colors. The participants were selected by the similar clothing that identified

Group Reflection Report
Group Speech Reflection This speech was something that I had never done before. I had given
group presentations in the past but never anything as long or as formal as this. Overall I was
pleased with the way our presentation went and I am glad I was able to get experience in doing
activities like this one. First, the most difficult part of the project to research for us were the
reasons why each individual did what they did. We were able to find the details about the incident
but we struggled to find reasons why they did it. These bits of information were crucial for us to
be able to find ways to reduce the numbers of mass shootings across the country. One thing that I
learned from being a member in a group assignment is that not only am I depending on myself to
get my work done, but I am also depending on a number of others to finish their own work and vice
versa. I did not want to let down my partners and I also did not want them to let me down.
Something that made this project easy was the fact that I worked with people that I get along with
well. There were no conflicting personalities and we were...show more content...
Tyler, Bryan, and I became sidetracked often and frequently had to steer ourselves back in the
right direction. When we did this we were able to focus and get valuable work done. I felt a
positive to our speech was that we presented a good amount of facts from reliable sources and we
were able to show a variety of reasons that these terrible events occur. Something that could have
been improved was when we cited our sources. Both Tyler and I had to go back and cite sources of
information that had already been said due to forgetting. I would have to pick Tyler as the most
valuable member of the group. He brought a number of valuable ideas to the table and he put in the
most amount of time when it came to working on the outline and the

Group Evaluation Essay
As a group, it was important to us to have this in our FVC for a few reasons. One of the reasons
for this was because we did not want any member to show up and be under the influence or
complain the whole time. If this were to happen, we would have to deal with that problem which
would take away time from working and would cause possibly a bigger problem. Profanity and
complaining would not be tolerated also because that would then effect the environment and
atmosphere of the work place. It can be assumed that with one of those problems occurring work
would not be as efficient and scheduled as planned as we thought it would be. Thankfully, during the
semester none of my group members complained or appeared to be under the influence during...show
more content...
Even though there were problems with people pulling their own weight, I think that the outcome
was great. We were able to create a program and without the other group members, it would not
have been successful. I think it is important to keep in mind the end goal while going through
some difficult stages with group members. Evaluation of Group Members This part of the paper
will be about me and my peers and the grade that I think they deserve pertaining to their
performance and attendance within the group. I will grade them based off of a focus on their
participation, help with planning, attendance, and behavior. I think that these are crucial parts of
"pulling your own weight" in order to help with the group as a whole. Katie Krasinski: A+. I
believe I deserve this grade for a multitude of reasons. Immediately when we got the project, I
along with Mike took some charge of the group. We wanted to meet as soon as we could so we
could get a head start. As the semester continued and our group started getting more work to do, I
feel that if participation went down extremely in our group. Some members would not show up, or
would try to push back the dates we would meet just because they didn't feel like it. On the other
hand, there I was clearing my busy day and plans to make time for the

Example Of A Group Proposal
Meagan S McBride Group Proposal The proposed group is for adolescents that have been
discharged from the inpatient unit and group therapy with peers going through similar experiences
is offered as a continuation of treatment. At discharge clients will be screened by their treatment
team who will decide if the adolescent is best suited by individual, group, or family therapy as exit
inpatient treatment. The group would be held at the facility and referral and screening are
nessicary to enter the group. The group will be open and clients will be assessed for a six–month
period following their discharge from the center. Creating a climate of trust within a group is
imperative to the success of a group, that coupled with the fact that the members of this group will
have been diagnosed and been in treatment for a variety of emotional and behavioral problems
including mood disorders, psychcotic disorders, severe disruptive behaviors, anxiety disorders, and
suicide attempts makes the importance of creating trust all the more difficult and vital. As the group
leader it will be important to understand the goals of the group, knowing my co–leader, trusting in
my own competences as a co–leader in this group, my abilities to be present will all be major
factors in my abilities to lead and model as well as create a trusting environment. This trust will be
conveyed and then it is the goal that it will be conveyed to the group and also reciprocated. Group

Essay on Self Evaluation on Group Discussion
The group discussion has just passed, and it was really a hard work and challenging. There were
many precious lessons I got, and, hopefully, so did with my friends. Our group was consisting of
four students. As a quantity, reasonably, we had had enough power to do a better work and gained a
satisfying result. As I flashed back to the group discussion, it was enriching my memories. Some
were in high spirit, remarkable and enjoyable. Opposite to it, few were disappointing.
I still remembered that when we directed for the first meeting everyone was very enthusiastic and
really keened to do it sooner. It was a successful meeting. Unfortunately, I had to let my friend knew
that I would be late for fifteen minutes. It was reasonable...show more content...
Hopefully, we would get a wide point of view to the case. Happily, it was worked out. We
collected the problems and everyone got certain problems to look for more information. I, myself,
got to check out more for health insurance and law matters. Also, we had second meeting to
discuss about the report and presentation. At the meeting, we decided to give one or two topics
each. Everyone got the same chance to get the topics. Due to I got an introduction only, therefore, I
had to help other pals. In addition, I offered myself to edit the report and hope for the others'
contribution as well. At the end of the meeting everyone was told to send their parts to me, and we
would have an online meeting. Also, the part that we got at the day would be, automatically, his or
her responsibility for the presentation. This was a very interesting and incredible group.
Everyone had sent me their part to me. After I compiled and edited the report we would have
further meeting. We discussed about the next meeting online. Everyone had agreed to have the
meeting in the next two days. After class a day prior to the meeting, everyone was told the meeting
was going to be at nine o'clock next day. As usual, I came ontime. My friends weren't at the meeting
point yet. I thought they would be late for fifteen or twenty minutes. I started working with the
report. I wrote the whole report. I had finished the report at, less or more, ten in

Group Performance Assessment
Performance Assessment: Socialization and Group Interaction
In this paper I will discuss the types of groups and the different dynamics of this group. Then I'll
share my views on how I determined my leadership style. Then I will also explain the characteristics
of a formal organization and bureaucracies.
Types of Groups
The types of groups are primary, secondary, expressive functions and instrumental functions. All
these groups are small, they hold the same aspects just different individual needs. They hold
different settings as well like that are made for a bigger group as in a classroom. Then we have
outside groups as in dyad and triad that are designed for large groups such as fraternities and
sororities.
Leadership Styles
Leaderships are to focus on the goals of being a leader. An instrumental leader wants to ahead of
all task seriously. So, she will give it to her top worker that she knows will succeed. Expressive
leader is there to support you, they are there to make sure you have everything together emotionally.
Also, a democratic leader is the leader to make sure everyone is all happy with the decisions to the
point where it's a vote to accommodate everyone. The laissez–faire leader is the same as the
democratic but it's not really a debate it's just...show more content...
The organizations fall under three categories. The first is called voluntary organization this org is
based on shared interest that everyone is interested in as well for example, FFA organization.
You will join this org if you are interested in animals, plants and the care of the animals. Next is
the coercive organization is when your pushed to join not really having another choice per say
for example like a rehab where you go and get help because you need it. Lastly is a utilitarian
organization is when you join a group because you need to. Like receiving a diploma or moving up
in the workplace, more a reward as

Personal Evaluation and Reflection on the Group Project
Your performance both as an individual and as a member of a team in the light of your assessment
of other group projects.
As an individual myself as well as being part of a group member in this project, I understand that I
have areas to improve on which before this, never realized. T he most significant that I realize
needed improvement is constant adjustment of one self, no matter on project matter, or relational
matter. Project wise, what I fall shorts is follow the technology trend. For instance, I use to study
Adobe Flash, and all the while I'm using Actionscript 2.0 .Well of course, during that time this is the
hype, everyone is talking about interactivity, and the demands are...show more content...
We never implement this technique to our project due to not completely understand the nature of the
technique. I believe that our project would have benefitted if we tried to apply this technique.
Are there things that you feel you ought to have covered in OPM that you would have helped you
with the Grou p Project? What things and how would they have helped?
Put aside the topic in OPM, Extreme Programming is another topic that OPM can emphasize on.
This method inspires me because it breaks the conventional way of doing a project, which is to
assign role f or each members, like software analyst, architect, programmers, testers, and integrator.
Extreme programmers will participate in all part of the method themselves.
Amongst other things the Group Project is intended to simulate some of the real experience of
working on a project in industry. Drawing on your experience and/or your imagination, describe the
ways in which you think the exercise was realistic and the ways in which you think it was unrealistic.
Justify your opinions.
One of the exercises that
I think is realistic in OPM is to do a Resume. Which in real life I really done my resume base on
that. In Group Project wise the things that I think is not so realistic is the documentation part. I
believe most of the software at the market have just a p age or on their documentation.
How did you feel about your participation in your team's presentation to the class? Was the
experience

Group Facilitation Self-Evaluation
Group Facilitation Self–Evaluation As a group, our goal as facilitators was to help the individuals
attending the group with coping skills and to help them find support while exploring the grieving
process. Overall, I would rate my personal success in the facilitation as a seven or an eight.
Although I feel like I was an active facilitator, there is always something that could use
improvement. Some of the aspects that I feel like I could improve on include feeling more
comfortable speaking in front of groups and feeling more confident in what I am saying, and not just
going through the motions. This can play a role in how much eye contact I have with the group as
well. The more comfortable I am with the information and the more confident

Group Analysis Essay
Introduction An important part of our learning and growing experience must stem from our ability
to analyze and reflect upon the groups that we have been members in. This reflection can define our
understanding of the weaknesses both in ourselves and in the others within our group; and it can
help to shape the way that we act in future groups. Adjusting ourselves to compensate for our
weaknesses, based upon an honest and thorough examination of our actions within a group setting, is
one of most important thing for any person to do. It is only through this evaluation that we can
improve ourselves and our interactions with others. This paper will examine a group that was
required to make an important decision about adding a new member...show more content...
The discussions broke the team members into two distinct groups. The debate that was held
about the two candidates revolved main around the values that each member held to be more
desirable; friendliness and experience versus reliability and knowledge. The first group argued
that the friendlier candidate would be a better fit for the position mainly because the members of
that group tended to be more heavily involved in people oriented side of the organization, while
the other group and the other candidate were more versed in the technical side of the organization.
However, rather than this group meeting basing its agenda on the discussion of the values of the
candidates, it was a series of comparison arguments in which each side attempted to argue why the
other candidate would not do well in the open position. Both groups turned away from the civility
required for such a group discussion to be rational and productive, and instead adopted a hostile
approach. Group member cohesiveness was absent from the group meeting for several reasons, but
the primary reasons were due to the fact that the group members did not have a common description
of value or structure to the discussion. Each member viewed their own area of involvement within
the organization as being more valuable than any other area, and it was this exclusion of other
valuable traits that lead the group to begin to clash in such a

Pre-Group Evaluation Research Paper
Pre–group Evaluation The pre–group evaluation is an important part of the group process. The
facilitator will notify appropriate school officials, adolescent organizations, local career and
counseling agencies, as well as parents in the area about the proposed group. Referrals can be made
by anyone in contact with the applicant or the applicant themselves. During the individual sessions
for each of the potential group members, the facilitator will conduct an informal interview with the
group member and a legal guardian, should the member be under the age of eighteen. The facilitator
will address any concerns about the group process, listen to the individual about any hesitations or
fears they may have, and begin to initially deselect applicants for the created group. The pre–group
sessions will allow the facilitator to appraise the potential member for appropriateness through needs
assessment, behavioral issues, and level of development. Should an issue present itself, the proper
recommendation for additional services will be conveyed to the applicant or their legal guardianship.
Along with the interview, the facilitator will obtain informed consent, confidentiality and provide a
brief introduction about the transition to adulthood group....show more content...
The facilitator will encourage the group to participate and to share as much or as little as they
would like. The facilitator will also answer any questions or concerns the group members may have.
Lastly, the facilitator will administer the pre–evaluation form created by Chase Dudine for the group
effectiveness. The first 10–20 minutes: The facilitator will review confidentiality and answer any
questions the group may have during this

Teamwork Essay
Introduction
In this essay, discussion will be made critically analysing teamwork in organisation. A team is a
unit of two or more people who interact and co ordinate their work to accomplish a specific goal
(Larson & Lafasto, 1989). Teamwork clearly provides benefits for companies or else it companies
would not be using this structural mechanism. The team concept implies a sense of shared mission
and collective responsibility.
Firstly, discussion will be made on management theories in regards to teamwork. These discussions
will be made upon academic articles analysing characteristics of effective team in organisational
structure, criticising the clear purpose, appropriate culture, specified task and suitable leadership.
Individual contribution to teams will be put together as another antecedent condition. Ability to
maintain functioning of team will also be described in this essay. The second main point in this
essay will be about building teams for performance which include many points including the ability
of team member to contribute and ability to maintain. These concepts discussed will be applied to
NS Print, an organisation that I belong to as a team member. NS Print is an organisation that
supplies of printed material and stationary goods to its consumers such as to small to medium size
businesses. It was founded in the year 2007, and is considered to be a small business with currently
employees of 4–6. The print shop has busy operations running throughout the

Group Evaluation Essay On The Embalming Process
Laney All Group Evaluation (Embalming process: Laney All, Hannah, Ethan M., Victoria, Taylor,
Lalani, Tommy, and Tyson) 1.I felt like I did a good job helping out my group any way I could.
My role was to help Tyson brainstorm for his script, research about the embalming process, make the
mummy costumes, help out with painting the jars, and assist anyone in my group who needed help
doing their duties. I felt that the work I accomplished was detailed and well thought out. It came
together very well and sharing the responsibilities of the different roles was definitely the way to
accomplish the tasks. I contributed by bringing in cardboard, buying the mummy sheets, and getting
an extra costume just in case someone forgot to bring in theirs. Overall,...show more content...
As a group, I felt that we worked diligently and brought everything together very nicely. Everyone
accomplished their research and knew about the embalming process. Taylor worked on the
makeup and had an awesome final product. Tommy even researched and asked how he could
help! He brought in a costume and participated however he could; even though he still would get
a little distracted. Tyson did not use his notes on the day of presenting, and kept the kids focused.
Of course, there were natural leaders (Lalani, Hannah, and myself) that kept the group moving
forward and on track. The others in my group worked alongside us and pulled together an
awesome performance! Everyone used their talents in different ways while preparing for the
presentation. 3.If I worked with anyone in this group again, I would choose Hannah, Taylor, or
Lalani. I felt that these three were very diligent workers and strived to do their work to the
highest level possible. Also, they were natural leaders and took the initiative in the group to make
sure the tasks were completed. The others worked well too, but did not take as much initiative as
the others. We all got the job done, and it turned out amazing! 4.If I were to grade myself, I would
give myself a 100. I aimed to do the best I could and put forth 100% effort into this presentation. I
worked together well within my group and assisted the others if they needed anything else. I wanted
to make sure that this project turned out amazing, and I felt

Critical Analysis of Group Work Essay example
After completing the group task of preparing a presentation on, transferring individual facilitation
skills into a group work setting I will critically reflect upon my own participation. I will evaluate my
self–awareness while working in the group, as well as those around me. The way that I personally
dealt with any issues that arose within the group and how that affected the group dynamics. I will also
briefly discuss the roles in which each member of the group took and how role allocation affected,
the group dynamics and the working relationships. Finally I will evaluate my work having discussed
it with my fellow group members.
In order to evaluate my role within the group it is important to identify what makes a group. A group
must...show more content...
Similar to Tuckman's five stages of group development is Corey and Corey, they claim that the first
stage; Pregroup is "setting expectations, establishing group rules and procedures, role preparation
and skills building" (Corey, Corey, Corey 2010 p123). The group did well in this stage, as the
group was given a very clear aim, we discussed each members skill sets and while preparing a
group contract with our aims objectives and rules. A group contract is a very useful facilitation
tool as it sets out very clear guidelines for the group and defines what is acceptable and
unacceptable behaviour for the group members (Tuckman 1965). The group members were able to
gain clarity from the group contract, allowing them to identify the norms and boundaries of the
group. For example our group decided that if a member were for any reason not be able to attend a
meeting they would have to let the team know in advance, if this did happen the rest of the team
would relay the information via email to the missing group member.
The next time the group met they were in the storming stage (Tuckman 1965). This stage is where
any conflict happens, the group member explore their roles within the group. Within this stage there
can often be a struggle for power, status and control. Even though conflict

Group Evaluation Board Games
Group Evaluation/Board Games
Game Title: This Way to Court
Topic: Judicial Branch, Civil Liberties, and Civil Rights
Group Members & Responsibilities/Work (What was each person responsible for/what did they do?
Include yourself.)
Name: Lindsay Josephs. I was responsible for creating approximately forty–five percent of the
questions, providing the colorful index cards to write the questions on, and for writing all of our
group's questions and answers on the index cards. I typed up my questions about the judicial branch,
civil liberties, and civil rights in our shared Google Document, the answers to these questions, and
then wrote down all of our group's questions and answers on colorful index cards.
Name: Lisa Kwok. Lisa was responsible for creating approximately forty–five percent of the
questions, providing the game pieces, and for creating the final version of the game's instructions.
Lisa added her questions and answers about all three topics onto our shared Google Document and
created the final version of the game's procedure.
Name: Emily Reinoso. Emily was responsible for creating ten of the questions we...show more
content...
We each completed different aspects of the project which highlighted our creative and intellectual
strengths. For example, Emily is very artistic. Therefore, Emily utilized her artistic skills and
drew and decorated the game board. Although each member focused on different aspects of the
project which highlighted her strengths, we all worked together and did not leave one person
doing all of the work. Lisa and I spoke with Emily about the design of the game and we all shared
ideas about how the board should look and which elements of famous board games should be
incorporated into our project. All group members also brainstormed about what the game's
instructions should be and which elements of other famous board games our game should be based
off

Evaluating Group Performance
Overall, the performance was okay, however, there were many flaws. My own performance was
not at all perfect because I definitely could have done a lot better. I should have taken more action
to actually lead the group more, but instead I was a little shy because of the fact that I was the
youngest. For example, I should have pushed the group to rehearse more, so we would have been
better at our lines. However, I was not the strongest leader and did not do so. In my performance I
should have been louder and projected my voice more and I should have done more acting instead
of standing. I could have also spoke a little deeper to sound like a boy, but I did not think about that
and worried more about my lines than I did the quality of what I was saying....show more content...
The main problem with our performance was that not everyone was loud enough and some people
did not speak with enough emotion in there words. We also did not act as much as we could have
because most of the time we were just sitting or standing. I liked to work with the partners I had,
however, it would have been nice if everyone would not have put as much on me. I know I put a
lot on myself, but sometimes all someone has to tell me is not to do so much and I will stop. I
honestly loved this group, but we just had a few flaws that could have easily been

Group Assessment
Rodolfo Bonilla
Assessment
Role–playing, simulations and program activities allow the group leader/ staff the opportunity to
provide the group members with situations that require them to engage in a process where the leader
/ staff can make observations and assess the member's behaviors. For example, role–playing allows
the group leaders and other members the opportunity to watch the group members work through
various scenarios, taking note of the ways they respond to the given scenario as well as the ways in
which they interact with the other members. This also allows the staff/ leader and providing them
with feedback and the opportunity to process with the group. Simulations and program activities
also allow all members to participate in the given activity as well as the chance to work through the
simulation. In doing so, the members are given an opportunity to explore the new skills, which in
turn provides the group leader the opportunity to assess nonverbal behavior as well as their
interactions with others and their...show more content...
In assessing the group through observations, the group leader can assess the relationships and the
health of relationships of the group members based on the level of communication between members.
The leaders can also assess the cohesion of the group as a whole based off communication patters
and the level of engagement of its members. The leader can also assess the members individually
comparing the levels of communication over a period of time and can assess character traits that
may expose other areas to further assess. Moreover, the communication patterns will allow the leader
to assess the overall function of the group and will help the leader identify appropriate interventions
to further the assessment and work with the members on the given

Bully Survival Support Group Evaluation Paper
Evaluation tool The evaluation tools utilized with the Bully Survival Support Group is to assess
the outcome of members' participation in the support group. In order to properly evaluate the
effectiveness of the support group to members based on their experience/symptoms, the tool will
be utilized as pretest and posttest. The mood and feeling questionnaire was utilized at the baseline
as well as after intervention phase. This tool can be found at and page 10 (take reference). The
Mood and Feeling Questionnaire comprises of a series of descriptive expressions regarding how
members' has been feeling before and after participation in the support group. The coding of the
questionnaire replicates whether the statements were descriptive of the members

Group Evaluation Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Best Paper Writing Service Reviews

More from Best Paper Writing Service Reviews (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Group Evaluation Essay