Quick Upload

Loading...
Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view slideshows. We have detected that you do not have it on your computer.To install it, go here
Post to Twitter Post to Twitter
Share on Facebook
Myspace Hi5 Friendster Xanga LiveJournal Facebook Blogger Tagged Typepad Freewebs BlackPlanet gigya icons
SlideShare is now available on LinkedIn. Add it to your LinkedIn profile.

Enterprise 2.0 Adoption Models.

From kevinshea, 5 months ago Add as contact

An outline of various models that can be used to launch Enterprise 2.0 -- and some caveats.

364 views | 0 comments | 0 favorites | 14 downloads | 1 embeds (Stats)

Categories

Groups/Events

Embed in your blog options close
Embed (wordpress.com) Exclude related slideshows Embed in your blog

More Info

This slideshow is Public
Total Views: 364 on Slideshare: 347 from embeds: 17
Most viewed embeds (Top 5): More
All Embeds: Less
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate

Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this slideshow as inappropriate.

If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Slideshow Transcript

  1. Slide 1: Adoption Models for Enterprise 2.0 In Black and White Kevin Shea 1 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  2. Slide 2: There are at least three (3) different models for Enterprise 2.0 adoption Kevin Shea 2 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  3. Slide 3: Generally, only two (2) are talked about Kevin Shea 3 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  4. Slide 4: The Standard Model Hierarchical Top-down Information flow Generally considered a “forced- on” approach, in which, organizational controls manage the introduction Kevin Shea 4 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  5. Slide 5: And, the most talked about…. Bottoms up, Grass roots model. In which, a good idea is typically spread through the efforts of a single early adopter. Desired by most practitioners. Kevin Shea 5 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  6. Slide 6: The grass roots model is often called the emergence model. Kevin Shea 6 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  7. Slide 7: Let’s call it the single initiation point model “SIP model” Arises from a single point Kevin Shea 7 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  8. Slide 8: Now….. since “a good idea has many fathers” Kevin Shea 8 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  9. Slide 9: Solutions can arise from many locations Kevin Shea 9 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  10. Slide 10: Creating a “MIP model” of adoption Kevin Shea 10 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  11. Slide 11: The Multiple Initiation Point (MIP) Model Bottom up, Grass roots, informational flow. In which, similar ideas are spawned simultaneously across a wide audience Kevin Shea 11 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  12. Slide 12: What can happen in a MIP Model? A dispersed Individual divisional units or units with less global unit can capable communication skills can come up with have the idea the same idea, in isolation. Kevin Shea 12 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  13. Slide 13: If a MIP model is left unchecked, it can lead to Kevin Shea 13 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  14. Slide 14: Competing solutions, information segmentation, confusion Which solution is the “right” one? Siloing ? ? ? ? A dispersed Individual divisional units or units with less global unit can favorable communication skills can come up with Kevin Shea idea have the the idea. 14 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  15. Slide 15: History shows that the MIP model contributes to problems in collaboration software installations that end up as “messy”/“file share only” solutions. Kevin Shea 15 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  16. Slide 16: Which model would most likely occur at your company? Kevin Shea 16 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  17. Slide 17: A MIP model requires some controls or guidance to succeed. Growth needs to be coordinated. Kevin Shea 17 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  18. Slide 18: So, there are at least three(3) different models for Enterprise 2.0 adoption Standard Single Initiation Point Multiple Initiation Point Kevin Shea 18 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  19. Slide 19: If you expect growth to occur as a result of an organically arising SIP model, Kevin Shea 19 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  20. Slide 20: And, You don’t at least plan to respond to a MIP scenario Kevin Shea 20 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  21. Slide 21: Then, Your execution strategy is in jeopdary. Kevin Shea 21 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series
  22. Slide 22: For a more detailed explanation and insight into the changing nature of Knowledge Management, visit my blog at http://kevinshea.typepad.com/ Other item in my In Black and White series. • Enterprise2.0: a Simple Explanation in Black and White http://kevinshea.typepad.com/kevin_shea_process_collab/2008/06/enterprise-20-a.html • Knowledge Management in Black and White http://www.slideshare.net/kevinshea/knowledge-management-in-black-and-white/ Kevin Shea 22 Part of the Kevinshea.typepad.com “In Black and White” series