Socialism Vs Capitalism

Socialism Vs Capitalism
"Something is wrong with capitalism... There must be a better distribution of wealth, and maybe
America must move toward Democratic Socialism" – Martin Luther King Jr.
Can a society with both billionaires and in–work poverty really be considered 'successful?'
Do you ever feel like you are underpaid at work? Is it too challenging to even find a job? Do you
disapprove of the great divide between the rich and the poor? Do you care about protecting the lives
of women and racial minorities? Do you care about protecting the environment for future
generations? These are the issues that Socialists care about most deeply. Come join us as we fight
for liberty!
It is a fact that our current society is built upon profit. Socialists argue that this profit comes from
the produce of the workers. For example, if a worker builds a table out of wood, the value of the
table is equivalent to the labor that the worker puts in, plus the labor necessary to get the refined
pieces of wood to the worker. This theory, dubbed ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Essentially, Socialists wish to construct a society in which the profit motive is gone, and in which
society as a whole democratically plans the economy. Money will be replaced with labor vouchers,
bosses by workers' councils, and shops with communal stores wherein proceeds of labor are
exchanged for vouchers. The traditional profit–driven capitalist 'firm', along with class society, will
be entirely vanquished. Socialists understand that revolution is necessary to put the working
enterprises into the hands of the workers on a mass scale.
We suggest that you join the Party for Socialism and Liberation (http://www.pslweb.org/about), as
they are currently the most popular Socialist party in the United States. The Principles of
Communism by Friedrich Engels is a slightly lengthier introduction to Socialism, and Karl Marx by
Vladimir Lenin is another good introductory reading for aspiring
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Capitalism Vs Communism
Capitalism and communism are two polar views of economic structure. Since I have been
influenced by capitalism, my worldview is different from an individual who lived in a communist
country. I would think the mature 'self' would be viewed differently between capitalism and
communism. In capitalism, there is personal material belonging and the aspiration towards the
American Dream that anything is possible to achieve. In communism, material and economic wealth
is spread among the people equally. The goal in communism is to meet the basic needs of all
individuals and people may strive less for self–actualization. Also, the view of a full and satisfying
life would be different. In capitalism, there is a balance of giving and taking. There is

The Dispute Of Communism Vs. Capitalism
The dispute of communism vs. capitalism
Coming from an Americans perspective it is difficult to comprehend that anything other than
democracy, a mixed system, and the way the United States operates would be suitable. However,
this is exactly why I very much enjoyed this task. While at first I was reluctant to believe that there
are any pros of either system due to the constant negative stereotypes linked with each system, I am
now able to broaden my horizon and see things from a different perspective. After conducting some
research I was able to see that there are indeed some benefits to both communism and capitalism.
While I managed to see these pros, the cons were still very prevalent and prove just why a mixed
system works best in the world we live in today. When it comes down to comparing the two systems
though, based upon the information that I gathered, I would say that I prefer capitalism highly to
communism.
Communism was initially established way back with the ancient Greeks in attempt to essentially
create a more equal state. Since then it has passed the test of time, but is being used less and less to
date. Communism on paper seems like a great idea; everyone receiving the same wages. Therefore,
there is no drastic range of rich or poor people. However, in practice, this is not the actual truth. The
problem that occurs here is that once this is set in place nobody can ever make any economical
improvements. So, in a predominantly lower class society poverty will

Capitalism Vs Capitalism
Capitalism is a system based on freedom, based on individual autonomy and rights .it is essentially
the economic result of a free market. Marx explains capitalism as a means of production based on
private ownership and no government interference. For capitalism to be successful, prices of goods
have to be competitive or lower than the market value, and sources of labor have to be completely
saturated to its carcass. Capitalism distinguishes itself from the feudal and the modern systems in
that its exploitation is more transparent. The exploitation of previous systems was hidden behind
religion, morality, and sentiments, whilst capitalism is maintained purely on money and naked self –
interest.
Over the past decade, the United States has arguably moved to a more capitalist economy, where all
property, goods, and services are owned by private individuals. Prices of commodity and labor are
allowed to fluctuate based on the forces of supply and demand, and industries are allowed to
function and thrive independent of government restrictions or interventions. (Ross, 2017). However,
their adoption of a capitalist economy is one which domination, vertical and horizontal monopoly
triumphs.
Capitalism in the United States has gradually transformed. It has become an economy where
domination, vertical and horizontal monopoly triumphs. The economy is not only now intertwined
with other aspects of society but sets the stage on the direction the nation should go. The free market

In the modern era, all people have subconsciously accepted "money slavery" because of the media
and environmental influences. Society at large has accepted that the rich people get wealthier, the
poor people get poorer, and brutality and ruthlessness are a "normal" part of the world. Also, in the
social class structure in a capitalist system, that everyone should have freedom, human rights,
choice, and equality in the society. However, the capitalist class must constantly be in search of
greater and greater profits; therefore, they will always tend to reduce the wages of their workers.
The capitalism system of private ownership can satisfy the individual ego and identity needs of its
participants. In social perspective, some families living in poverty–level wages and in the capitalist
social class system, the poverty is often overlook in the society.
In "Pointing to trends such as the growing competitiveness of foreign workers and the education gap
between rich and poor" (Glazer 346), the foreign workers, have education and language problems.
Therefore, they don't get reasonable remuneration in the society. The owners believe that they are
paying decent wages for the worker and that they are creating job opportunities for the workers as
well. Obviously, from the perspective of the capitalist, the poor families should be satisfied because
they have a career and money, but the wages the poverty families amount to little to meet that their
basic needs. Yet, the poor families

Capitalism Vs. Socialism And Socialism
Capitalism vs Socialism Capitalism and socialism have been two school of thoughts in economics
that have opposing factors, and there have been a lot of criticisms and comparison on which
economy is better in terms of economic equality, and the role that the government plays in the
society. In most situations, a society with a better economic opportunities and choices, with more
technological advancement and private owned businesses would be a better option to a society that
is collectively owned, and operated by all members of a society. While the socialist believe that
economic inequality is inappropriate for a society, and the government playing the role of providing
"free education, subsidized health care for the elderly, and higher taxes on the rich", the capitalist
believe the government; a socialist economy lacks the effective use of economic resources, therefore
providing a system of government that provides individual rights, objective laws, and a free market
economy would be more efficient. In a capitalist economy, an individual is allowed to own a
property, and have the freedom to organize and operate for profit purpose; emphasis on individual
profit rather than on workers or the society as a whole, therefore encouraging firms to be more
efficient and innovate new products that acknowledges the interest of the people without the
interference by the government or any regulation necessary to protect public interest, and at the
same time, keeping the national

State Capitalism vs Liberal Capitalism
Overview
Capitalism is the combination of many actions that provides the economic structure such as the
changing balance of output, trade, income and employment. This is based on private ownership by
means of corporations or individuals. There are many types of capitalism. This essay discusses two
types of capitalism that are currently being debated in the media, State capitalism and liberal
capitalism.
This essay also investigates whether the South Africa is really state capitalism or are they using
Major Private Sectors to socially develop the South African economy, being Neoliberal capitalism?
State Capitalism VS Liberal Capitalism
State capitalism is when the government takes control over the commercial economic environment.
The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By increasing the number of firms and projects will shift the demand curve to the right and therefore
increasing the number of labours from L1 to L2.
Transportation and Water
Government is planning to develop and integrate rail, road and water infrastructure in various parts
of South Africa. This is increasing the production of minerals; namely coal, platinum, palladium,
chrome and other minerals. This will also expand the rail transport thus connecting coalfields to
power stations.
The government is planning to link South Africa's major cities, such as Gauteng, Durban and the
Free State with each other and with the major sea–ports to improve exports. The government is
implementing this integration with their state owned enterprise, Transnet. Thus implying that the
upgrade of transportation is state led capitalized. Further to this, Transnet is reducing port charges to
decrease the cost of doing business.
Furthermore the reason for government intervention in transportation and water development is to
increase the production of minerals which is our primary GDP driver. Mining Industry contributes
8.8% directly to the country's gross domestic product (GDP) and another 10% indirectly. (Brand
South Africa 2012)
Health and Education
Government is implementing National health insurance systems such as the refurbishment of
hospitals and nursing homes. As well as spending a large amount of money for schools and
universities in poor areas such as Mpumalanga and the

Capitalism Vs. Socialism In The Industry Of Healthcare
There is a vast difference between the economic systems of capitalism and socialism. While both are
ways to govern a country's market, they vary tremendously when looked at in depth. Capitalism is
more effective and it encourages business growth and economic risk.
First, Capitalism is a much more effective form of governing due to the free markets created in areas
of industry. Free markets create competition and jobs, which, in turn creates more wealth and drives
prices and quality up. For example, Capitalism is very effective in the industry of healthcare.
Healthcare under a Capitalist system is privatized, and care is treated as a product that is provided
by different companies. Because companies must be competitive in order to survive, prices

Capitalism vs Democracy
Capitalism and Democracy The political system and the economic system of the United States have
been intertwined since the very founding of our country. Although there are many different views on
how well the systems work or how they function, this has been a common thought shared by all
different sides. Some have an optimistic view of capitalism, while others feel as though capitalism
favors too few people. Two major points of view, the conservative and the "reform" liberal, describe
how capitalism works, and the role for the government in managing the marketplace, in two similar,
yet very different ways. First, we look at the thoughts of Milton Friedman, of the conservative point
of view. According to Friedman, capitalism is a free ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It would also be the function of the government to regulate "public goods", or something where it is
difficult or impossible to determine the particular user or the amount used. For example, a
lighthouse is a public good, because it is almost impossible to identify who uses the light to guide
them or how often they use it. Friedman ultimately believes that the government should stay out of
economic affairs as much as possible, for every time the government acts the freedom of the people
shrinks, and all government interventions have more costs then they do benefits. When the
government regulates the way a business operates, for example, requiring steel plants to put filters
on their smoke stacks, it increases the cost of doing business, which increases prices and decreases
sales, production, jobs and wages. Capitalism, according to Friedman, has a way of efficiently
working things out on its own, and needs very little government intervention. Many programs we
have today, such as social security, Medicare, and welfare to name a few, Friedman would do away
with, as they are the responsibility of the individual, not the government. The marketplace is even
more proportional to public demand than the political system is, and will constantly cycle through
different phases and work itself out without the need of government regulation. Milton Friedman
looks at capitalism as a free and voluntary system that should be driven by the consumer not

Robert Reich Capitalism Vs Capitalism
Capitalism? More like CRAPitalism Robert Reich begins his book by asking the question of if the
reader remembers a time when "the income of a single schoolteacher or baker or salesman or
mechanic was enough to buy a home, have two cars, and raise a family," and as college students
reading this book, the answer is a resounding no. The image of the American Dream, where all
people can prosper regardless of their situation, is simply not possible in the United States today.
The economic system where the beloved "free market" reigns, has evolved into a system that
benefits the wealthy, and doesn't think twice about those who have little economic power. Rhetoric
in the United States regarding economic policy is based around the ideal level of involvement by the
government, but this discourse simply distracts those who are not benefitting from capitalism from
the fact that the system does not benefit them. In theory, a democratic government should pass laws
that benefit the largest amount of its citizens possible, yet the United States' government has
continued to pass laws that benefit the select few at the very top. The "free market," has become
accepted as the norm–– and so have the systemic inequalities that accompany it. The system is not
questioned, simply, because those in power have used their power in order to cement the system into
place. Wealth disparity is seen as natural because the dollar amount on your paycheck correlates to
your worth in the "free market." To

Plain Capitalism Vs Democratic Capitalism
Capitalism is an omnipresent system that has taken on many unique and defined forms throughout
its existence. While capitalism comes in a variety of disguises, one thing about capitalism has
always remained the same – the nature of its selfish being. Capitalism thrives on hard work.
Individuals that work hard will undoubtedly be rewarded. On the contrary, those that are not able to
work are left in a dreadful predicament. Even with two distinct versions of capitalism – plain
capitalism and democratic capitalism – both involve the necessary component of free enterprise.
Capitalism considers free enterprise something to be achieved individually with rewards intended
for just oneself. Adam Smith came along and challenged that notation ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
To further illustrate this concept, I will share with you my time working in an undisclosed animal
park compared to my time working as a Certified Nursing Assistant at a hospital. The animal park
was innovative and practically screamed free enterprise. There were rules, regulations, and an
ethical code of conduct – all necessary components for democratic capitalism. However, higher ups
were not elected – they were appointment by the owner. Likewise in the hospital setting, supervisors
were also appointed from upper management. Something unique about working in the hospital,
however, was that there were elected members of a resident government – needed for democratic
capitalism. Following Adam Smith's theory, the hospital I worked for had many incentives in place.
At the hospital, I could accumulate paid time off and earn additional bonuses for picking up
unscheduled shifts. As Smith would have predicted, I undoubtedly worked harder at the hospital
because the only incentive to work at the animal park was for my check and nothing additional. At
the hospital, I felt more involved with my work. Although one might argue against healthcare and its
intentions, I worked hard because I believed that I personally was helping

Capitalism Vs. Socialism
The debate between Socialism and Capitalism is one that is very hot these days. President Obama
just spent the last eight years taking the United States closer and closer to Socialism, while President
Trump is doing everything in his power to reverse this trend and move the country back to a more
Capitalistic society. Even though I may not agree with all of President Trump's decisions or the way
he conducts himself, I am very pleased with the direction he is taking our country, because,
Socialism is simply not a long–term replacement for Capitalism. I do not believe that pure Socialism
will work for a couple reasons. One reason is that socialism, as well as Communism, are both based
on the idea that the government is in charge of distributing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
It is not possible to give a percentage of the world that is either Socialist or Communist because
most countries are a combination of two or three of these systems. It is, however, safe to say that
there is room for it to spread and as long as there are politicians offering free stuff, there will be
socialism. The biggest threat to Socialism is Capitalism.
There is no perfect economic system. They all have flaws because they are made up of people.
Greece and Venezuela are examples of where Socialism did not succeed, whereas China and Cuba
are considered by some as a success. On the other hand, the United States of America has been
around and continued to grow to over 200 years as a predominantly Capitalistic

South Towers Vs Capitalism
Capitalism Vs. Humanity in the North and South Towers In chapters 1–5 of 102 Minutes by Jim
Dwyer and Kevin Flynn, the theme of capitalism over humanity in the North and South towers is
examined. For instance, capitalism was put ahead of humanity as the proprietors of the towers
reduced stair space to create more rentable space (Dwyer and Flynn 64). With more rentable space,
the proprietors could produce larger profits, even though it was against the safety code(Dwyer and
Flynn 65). The South tower was evacuated during the 1993 terrorist attack, causing an executive
from Cantor Fitzgerald to be livid as it disrupted their business (Dwyer and Flynn 79). Despite the
fact that it was the safest option to evacuate the towers, many businesses

Communism vs Capitalism
Is Communism a better economic system than capitalism? By Michael Kujawski
Since the beginning of the 20th century many countries have favored the economic system of
communism over capitalism many political partys around the world that are communist based have
the term "workers party"incuded in their name because communism is a system for the working
class and capitalism is a competitive system for the upper class society to benefit. Communism was
not envisioned by one person but molded and perfected by many one of the key contributors to the
creation of communism was Karl Marx who wrote The Communist Manifesto which heavily
criticized capitalism "The flaws Marx found in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
,145).Also like communism, capitalism benefited the economy and because of the free markets
people are most likely more pleased with filling their own quota Than that of a controlling and
demanding communist state who owned all of the land like lords owned land and surfs were brought
to farm it in the feudal age
Both capitalism and communism were positive in their own ways and also negative in their own
ways but to find the dominant force one must compare the pros and cons of both economic systems
that are the most popular in the world today. "The primary point of difference between capitalism
and communism is regarding the ownership of 'means of production' or resources in general" (
Phatak.,1). Capitalism is based on the profit motive as the main factor that drives the economy.
Capitalism motivates individuals and companies to strive and gain profits, to accumulate wealth and
in the process contribute to building the economy. Capitalism is a system where those with greater
ability and will to accumulate more profits are rewarded by the system, while the losers are those
who fail to strive for profits this system dominates the western world .In The Communist economic
system people are never unemployed because the government owns production. Meaning the
governments owns all the factories and stores because there are no private owners in a Communist
system. This is good because the government

Capitalism Vs. Socialism
Capitalism vs. Socialism Capitalism and Socialism have very around a long time since the Industrial
Revolution and some of their characteristics still continue to be in use today in many countries
around the world. Capitalism was mainly used in nineteenth century England and created
widespread poverty and many people disagreed with the way Capitalism worked. They thought it
created an unfair balance between the rich and the poor and overall made a widespread class
struggle against poverty. Socialism rose up as an economic theory because of all the problems that
Capitalism was having. It was based on the fact that many people wanted to diminish the separation
between the rich and poor and make them equal.
Capitalism was the economic system based on money and in which property and the means of
production (like factories) were owned by businesses and separate people. This system functions
when people follow their own self interest and beliefs so progress will result. The government
doesn't interfere in the economy because the rules of the market–place benefit everyone. This ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In socialism they think that the government should own all property and all of the means of
production. The government also should be acting to protect workers since employers often take
advantage of them. This system also works so that all goods will be distributed according to each
person's individual needs. It also works by progress results when producers of goods cooperate for
the benefit of all without any competition at all. In the early 19th century socialists believed that the
spirit of cooperation could replace the market–place competition of capitalism but late 19th century
socialists like Karl Marx believed cooperation wasn't possible and the conflict between the owners
of capital and those who worked for them was

Feudalism Vs Capitalism
Feudalism differs from capitalism because there was no imperative to increase productivity. In
capitalism, the pressure of markets forces workers to become more efficient. There is a perpetual
competition between manufacturers for who can best meet the demands of the consumer, so workers
are constantly trying to improve their productivity. As laborers increase productivity, there is
technological advancement. If a worker or a business in a capitalist society fails to be efficient, it
will struggle to subsist because the consumer would accept cheaper deals from more efficient
manufacturers who could afford to offer lower prices. In contrast, there were specific rules, laws,
and customs in feudalism that prevented the demand to increase productivity. Peasants were not
driven to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Land was too influential to how much status one had in feudal Europe to be manipulated as a
commodity (p. 46). In capitalism, land is bought and sold for economic profit, and whoever can
manipulate the real estate market the best makes the most money. Money is a major source of power
in capitalism, so one who successfully buys and sells land gains status in a capitalist society. In
feudal Europe, the King granted land to vassals that were the lords of large estates, who granted land
to vassals who were the lords of other estates, and all of the lords granted land to peasants (11/22
Notes). Peasants pledged an oath of fealty to their lords in exchange for land and military protection.
The amount of status a person had in feudal Europe was measured by the amount of people willing
to obey him (Feudal Europe Quiz), and the subservience of peasants came from a need for land,
which only lords possessed. Therefore, land was the currency of power, and power was not to be
manipulated like a

Capitalism Vs Marxism
Capitalism We living a society running as a (mercantile capitalism) The pursuit of profit through
enterprise and trade existed long before 15th century. It is not that capitalism was suddenly invented,
but rather than beginning in the 15th century capitalism began to expand rapidly in some societies
including ours. It all started in Europe during the Create an inherent inequality owners who Marx
called the bourgeoisie power over the workers called proletariat. In Marxism, to fix this inequality,
society must shift to a model where the proletariat get to hold this power instead. By collectively
controlling more of the productions. According to Marx, socialism is precursor to communism and
the next logical step after capitalism. In socialism, instead of competing with each other as in a
capitalist society, the workers contribute as much as they can to greater productions and goods. Final
result, the all share equally in that good. There are no true communist country and there never have
been. All countries have their states controlling the employment and the economy in some degree.
Even Russia, the country ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The people with power took advantage of that and make people pay for it. Water is everywhere on
Earth.
It suppose to be a natural resources that all people should have access to. Water is now put in bottles
and sell for money. We have to pay for the water we use everyday. Food is also an important
resource that people need for their everyday life. Exclude the local farmers who actually grow their
vegetables and their meat naturally, there are people that just want to make profit will do anything to
fasten their income.
Profit– We living in a society where they value profit over people nowaday. They would do anything
to maximize their profit without caring about how others might be affected. They would put
fertilizer into their crops to make it grow bigger and create the attractive

2.2 Capitalism is chaotic
Marx also criticizes capitalism because of its chaotic nature. In this regard, the author states that
capitalism only allows economies to thrive on crises that tend to stimulate them. As a result, Marx
argues that the reliance on this crises was an avenue for creating economic havoc in the long run
which is risky for the economy and the country as a whole. For that reason, Marx advocated for a
planned community which will be an essential replacement for such spontaneous, erratic and
freewheeling system (AllAboutWorldview.org, 2017). Even in periods when capitalist economies
seem to function relatively smoothly, without incidences such as recession or inflation, the Marxian
theory depicts capitalism as a destructive economic system (Wolff & Resnick, 2012).
2.3 Capitalism breeds inequality
Karl Marx, a renowned philosopher and economist is against capitalism because he believed that
created conditions that promoted inequality (Alfarsi, 2016). Capitalism creates two classes of people
in society. In this regard, Marx states that capitalism results in a class of people known as
proletarians who are majorly composed of the working class as well as the bourgeois which
comprises of the capitalists who are the owners of the factors of production. As a result of the
competing interests, capitalism creates a struggle between these two classes of people hence the
reason as to why it is undesirable.
3.0 Neoclassical
Officially coined in 1900, the neoclassical

Capitalism Vs. Socialism : The Transitional Period Between...
Capitalism versus Socialism
In the theories developed by Karl Marx, socialism is considered the transitional period between
capitalism and communism. For a long time, capitalism versus socialism has been argued and
debated. Socialism is an economic system in which goods and services are provided through a
central system of government and aims to make everyone equal. They have different forms of
socialism that have different beliefs. Some of the biggest disadvantages of socialism are that it relies
on the cooperative effort of the people to work. Another downside would be that the people would
be as innovative in a socialist society. But in this society, no one lives in poverty and the people
work at what they are best at and what they ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Socialists reward those who treat money poorly and penalize those who treat money well. Another
disadvantage is that because everyone earns the same amount, not many people would be as
innovative as a capitalistic society. Socialism is unassumingly limited, so that if workers are done
with this type of economic system, the people could try and overthrow the government. Another
issue is inflation, socialism by itself cannot. Usually, the socialists in power view money as morally
bad and don't consider that money is a limited resource. As a consequence, a lot of socialists that
gain power rapidly increase public debts and print money to finance their actions. "Without
fundamental reform to restore a stable currency and private incentives, the people of Venezuela will
continue to suffer. Venezuela is at the mercy of world oil prices, despite sitting on top of the world's
largest proven oil reserves. Chávez implemented policies to expand access to housing, education,
medical care, and food and paid for them with revenue from oil exports. This complete dependence
on oil left Venezuela vulnerable to changes in its price. In 2014, oil prices began a steep decline,
falling from over $100 a barrel in the summer of 2014 to a low of around $33 dollars a barrel in
early 2016. Printing money closed the budget shortfall. Hyperinflation took hold, destroying the
savings of

Capitalism Vs. Socialism And Communism
Capitalism VS. Socialism/Communism Analysis The industrial revolution changed the way people
lived. Before the industrial revolution all the work that is now done by machines was done by hand.
It also allowed the ambitious working class man to join the rich at the top. This was done through
capitalism and laisses–faire economics which gave businesses the ability to operate in a free market
without government regulation. Capitalism deserves its share of criticism because of the abuses it
caused during the industrial revolution. These abuses were the origins of other economic systems
such as socialism and communism. Socialism and communism are not perfect systems either, they
promise equality but do it in a way that brings people down. Economic systems were very
controversial during the industrial revolution and they need to be further analyzed to be understood.
Capitalism according to Merriam–Webster is: an economic system characterized by private or
corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and
by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a
free market. In summary, capitalism is a system in which every man is making decisions for their
personal gain without the government getting involved. This ideology along with new machines
created a surplus of goods. Goods were available to everybody due to the surplus and exportation.
The result is more goods sold and more money

Communism Vs Capitalism Research Paper
Communism and capitalism are two completely differential economic systems. Capitalism is
defined as freedom of the market, & the ability to privatize and create profit. Communism can be
described as where facts of production are collectively owned and directed by government. There
are many pros and cons to both communism and capitalism. But there are widely viewed as
opposing economic systems. In capitalism, each person is free to choose a career in which best suits
the individual with absolutely no government interference. This means that everyone is not
guaranteed an occupation. in a free enterprise economy we are able to own private property, race for
success, & choose are place in society. An enterprise organizes and directs production. ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Everybody gets the same pay, and there is no chance of corporations decreasing the quality of
something for profit. The characteristics of capitalism reflect a system where the people at the
bottom stay there most of the time when the top 10% owns more than half of the nations wealth.
Communism sees the dangers of greed and inequality, and outlaws corporations. Communism was
set upon Marxism ideology. Karl Marx gave the importance to the labor and labor power. People
that had to sell their labor were referred to as proletarians and the ones who bought labor were
capitalist.
In other words the cost to make something was always lower than the price of something in order
for economic success. The difference is called "surplus value", this has is its source in surplus labor,
as in the difference of the wages of the workers making the product and what they can produce. This
is the capitalists profit. The profit was made by the proletarians labor. So this is why it should
belong to the proletarian. Communism fixes this problem due to the equal distribution of pay. The
major downfall of communism was the dictator that ruled over it. It made communism seem evil
because of which the evils that Mao did, when it is actually just another way of living that can be
executed thoroughly if carefully examined and modified as it

Considering the way in which people live their lives these days, it can be noted that they are not
living a balanced life; if a balanced life is to be considered as the life which includes both
capitalistic involvement and family–time in equal portions . Every average–individual favors a
capitalistic world, and this desire brings many complications which result in unbalanced lifestyles.
That is mainly because capitalism requires time dedication which people willingly dedicate, and this
obstructs the gateway to the balanced life. Hence, people are unable to spend an equal amount of
time with their families as they are at their workplace. Families and friends can provide the people
with genuine–happiness and a stress–free environment, the two factors that capitalism fails in
providing even if the people, like Adam Gopnik, love the career life they're living. people's minds
are soaked with the idea that capitalism will lead them to success, to living the life they want in the
future, so they continue to become an active part of the capitalistic world. However, although
capitalism rewards the people with money, which is the number one concern for many, it fails in
rewarding the people with a balanced lifestyle. Due to the increasing interest in joining the
capitalistic life, individuals believe successful capitalists have to be very productive and so they
spend hours and hours of their valuable time putting their maximum effort in becoming successful
capitalists. Readings from

Responsible Capitalism Vs Crony
The quote introduces conflicting discrepancies between, one party posses astounding levels of
power whereas the secondary party being peasants render powerless with all exercisable rights
demised. Given the underlying circumstances, deeming these peasants helpless, taken into account
the inability to produce ownership to the land they once occupied. There's no need for Government
to justify forward exertion as everything is permissible. Arguably an adequately constructed plan
under these pretenses warrants successful execution.
There are approximately four forms of capitalism one which identifies actions brought forth within
the present scenario. Rather, than choosing Crony Capitalism, I suppose Responsible Capitalism was
more related given

Dbq Essay On Communism Vs Capitalism
Edit with the Docs app
Make tweaks, leave comments, and share with others to edit at the same time.
NO THANKSUSE THE APP
CC Essay
Timp
Jacob Timp
Mrs. Armstrong
Introduction to College Writing
21 February 2018
Capitalism v Communism Economic Systems
Two of the world's most popular and diverse economic systems are Communism and Capitalism.
Capitalism, or a free enterprise economy, is an economic system constructed by the freedoms of the
marketplace. The capitalist economy has several promising advantages. The capitalist government
subtly changes and adjusts to the current conditions with ease. A communist system can be defined
as an economic system where many, if not all, factors of production are controlled and owned by the
government. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, everyone is not always guaranteed employment. The government may or may not offer
support in search of employment. It is often dependent upon the occupation, employer, and career
length of an individual. In a free enterprise economy, there is an unrealized freedom to choose.
People are granted the ability to select an occupation based upon their education, experience, and
personal preference. People choose whether to pursue entrepreneurship or to be employed by a third
party. They can choose to change positions and employers whenever they would like to which is
often not true of a communist system. An additional significant advantage of a capitalist system is
private ownership and control of property. The government also provides services and support to its
entire population. In a capitalist economy, the government often syncs with the desires of its
citizens.
In a communist economic system, decisions are made by the overall community. In practice,

attempts to implement a communist system have developed state–driven economies benefiting only
single–party political elitists not accountable to their citizens. Capital assets are owned collectively
by the state rather than private parties. Labor rates and the prices of goods are established by the
government rather than supply and

Capitalism Vs Industrial Capitalism
What is capitalism? According to the Merriam–Webster dictionary capitalism is an economic system
characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined
by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined
mainly by competition in a free market.
Transitioned from mercantile capitalism later expanded to joint stock companies moving into
industrial capitalism. Industrial capitalism was larger in scale and different in practice. Joyce
Appleby's definition of industrial capitalism: "An economic system that relies on investment of
capital in machines and technology that are used to increase production of marketable goods."
In The Wealth of Nations, published in 1776. Smith advocated that the production of wealth would
increase if people were allowed to pursue their self–interest, with little intrusion from government.
In serving their own interests, people would serve the public interest, unconsciously, as if guided, as
he said, by an "unseen hand." Capitalism is built on self interest, it's a system of give me more and
can never inspire admiration. Today there seems to not be a better alternative to capitalism, but anti–
market feelings persist. The current market system is more proficient at constructing wealth and
fulfilling desires than any other system currently known. Capitalism encompasses the legal,
political, economic and cultural systems all working together to create wealth

Business Ethics vs. Capitalism Essay
The concept of business ethics has tried to change the way businesses operate over the years.
Business ethics is a form of ethics that governs the actions of businesses to circumvent the affects
business has on every day society. But some question its effectiveness in the application of
capitalism. Several case studies have shown that this is the case; many companies place the pursuit
of money in front of the pursuit of virtue. Although, the majority of companies are not in the
spotlight of acting unethically, can we conclude that they follow the ethical norms? It is natural for
normal human beings to act ethical but businesses are on a completely different playing field. But
could business ethics be clearly possible in capitalism? ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Businesses will compete with each other giving consumers the advantage and therefore help the
economy profit. Friedman believes that capitalism the economy will take care of itself and any
outside forces would disrupt its process. In capitalism the worker is a commodity in so as to produce
the products needed for the market. Each individual does what they are best at producing and if
everyone does this then each person's needs are taken care of. When each person is working they are
paid money for their labor. With this money they can buy goods, which can fulfill their own desires,
and so the trading of money for goods can take place in a capitalist market driving the economy
forward (Smith 158). Capitalism depends on a free economy but does business ethics shake the very
structure of a free economy? Some critics agree that business ethics infringe on the right of a free
capitalist economy but others say that businesses are not following their social responsibility and so
there should be a place for business ethics in a capitalist economy. But what kinds of ethics would
be applicable to a free market economy such as capitalism? In business ethics there are several
different types of ethical behavior that exist. Although there are many different kinds of ethical
behavior, three are the most prevalent within society; these are utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue
ethics. In Utilitarianism ethical

Socialism Vs Free Market Capitalism
Socialism and Free Market Capitalism are two very different economic schools of thoughts. The
biggest disagreement between these two schools is economic equality and the role of the
government. Socialisms' originated as a social organization based on the holding of most property in
common, with actual ownership given to the workers and their main principle is equality. In
contrast, free market capitalism is a theory based around a free market and privatization in which
ownership is given to the individual people and their main principle is individual rights.
Socialism was developed by Karl Marx in 1848. Socialists believe economic equality is bad for the
society and the government is responsible for reducing it.Real socialism, by definition, is
democratic. There are many different types of socialism, like democratic socialism, revolutionary
socialism, utopian socialism, libertarian socialism, market socialism, eco–socialism, and Christian
socialism. The former Soviet Union and Nazi Germany are historical examples of a socialist
economy. And today's examples consist of Cuba, Venezuela, and China. Their main focus is on
profit being distributed among society/workforce to complement individual ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
An economic system where the four factors of production(entrepreneurship, capital goods, natural
resources, and labor) are owned by private entities, not the government. The United States, Hong
Kong, Singapore, and Australia are big projectors of free market capitalism. They feel that society
would be better off with the free market determining economic winners and losers. Capitalists main
focus is having individual profit rather than society as a whole profit. Two famous capitalists are
Robert Rubin and Alan Greenspan. Capitalists need a free market to succeed. This is where parts of
supply are priced and then distributed according to the laws of supply and

Communism Vs. Capitalism : Rough Draft
Jack Clendenen
English 1A
Professor Roffel
October 10th, 2014
Communism vs. Capitalism Comparison Rough Draft Throughout the history of the United States,
capitalism has always been a staple in American society. Would the country we live in today be an
enhanced, more equal place to live if it were a communist one? Communism, by definition, is more
or less an economic system of society in which the major resources and means of production are
owned by the community and are not monopolized. Whereas in capitalism, private businesses and
firms are generally in command concerning the trading of goods within what is considered a
multifaceted system of prices and markets. Though Capitalism is not perfect, it is the best option the
United States has to date according to many analysts. During the times of the industrial revolution,
the idea of communism was very popular, and for good measure. While the factory owners are
sitting back and collecting their riches, men, women and children are working 18 hour days in
unfathomable working conditions. This uneven distribution of wealth evoked government
intervention and prevented monopolies from further dominating the economic world. During the
20th century, a plethora of countries had declared themselves as communist, though only five
remain today. There have been countries that have tried this form of government. The results of
these countries' experiences with communism were largely unsuccessful. When Russia became
communists, it

Capitalism Vs Religion
Exam #3
Capitalism thrives in the United States in a manner different than anywhere else in the world. As
time passed, it became apparent that spending and creating secured the power it currently possesses.
While this country appears to be secular in the way it is regulated, it in actuality owes its economic
success to religion. Reality is, the notion of capitalism and the American work ethic is owed to
Protestants, despite the secular worldview Americans have held in more recent times. Weber argues
that the Protestant work ethic provided a foundation for the success of capitalism in the secular
sphere of collective society. The "calling" derived such practicality in terms of economics through
its individualistic approach to eternal salvation. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Worshippers of the faith were now more inclined to save and invest wisely in all their economic
endeavors. Because of the practicality implemented in their faith, the Protestants became committed
to practicing smarter tactics to obtain a place in Heaven. The role that these ideas played in the
formation of their economic success, was integral to not only their success, but the rise of capitalism
in the United States. The ideas that were derived from this faith soon became the spirit of capitalism.
This spirit was easily applicable to capitalism, and the practices and methods the Protestants
developed soon became more commonplace within collective society. The ascetic practices that
were being implemented in the United States were now integral to credit and value, which is a core
belief of Protestantism. However, despite the success that the United States now possessed due to
the rise of capitalism in their society, they reached a level of idleness in their spirit. By complying to
economic modesty, the average American worker was now trapped in an "iron cage". This "iron
cage" refers to the over rationalization of the United States with their money. By becoming
conscious of their actions and aware of the result that followed, the workers' spirit died a little. The
calling soon enough became an illusion that existed long ago in a different society, but is now

Capitalism Vs Socialism
Socialists are all about giving and sharing("Socialism"). An example of socialism that most people
use is this: If everyone combines their money together and divides it equally amongst one another,
then it is fair. But after realizing that the person with one dollar receives ten dollars by doing
nothing, and the person who has twenty dollars and now has ten, one would say that that it is unfair.
It is the same thing with socialism and capitalism. The socialists have the mindset of sharing no
matter what, and this is where most people disagree. The Bible says we are to give. Proverbs 28:27
says, "Those who give to the poor will lack nothing, but those who close their eyes to them receive
many curses" (The Bible NIV). We are all called to give ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
America is the largest wealthy group in the world, and it can be used to help people if used right.
Statistics show that the top 1% of income owners in the world make $34,000, and the top 14% of the
world make $11,000 which is more than what the majority of America makes ("Cap. Vs. Soc.",
Ramsey). It is not luck or random that America is one of the wealthiest nations in the world, but it is
because of capitalism. Tying freedom and capitalism together is like tying faith and service together.
Freedom, when it comes to capitalism, is the essence of legal and economic capitalism when done
correctly. This is biblical. For example, the Bible says to say the truth and to serve others.
Colossians 3:9 says, "Do not lie to one another, seeing that you have put off the old self with its
practices," and 1 Peter 4:10 says,"Each of you should use whatever gift you have received to serve
others, as faithful stewards of God's grace in its various forms." People of faith have worship service
and companies who tell the truth have customer service ("Cap. Vs. Soc.", Ramsey). Dave Ramsey
says, "Serving at the core of capitalism when it is done right, does not always make the news, but
you can always show appreciation by leaving a tip when you go out to eat." In this example, you are
giving a prophet to a server, and the money can be used to benefit that person and their family.
Telling the truth and serving are judeal traditional ethics. Judael Christian ethics does not speak for
all religions, but when it is combined with the freedom that America has, it gives the "little man" the
best shot he or she has ever had in the world ("Cap. Vs. Soc.", Ramsey). Dave Ramsey also says,
"Capitalism gives the little man the best shot at not only survival but prosperity. Communism has
yet to do so, and the government has provided nothing ("Cap. Vs. Soc.",

Free Market Economy Vs Capitalism
Over the centuries, society has debated the most effective and economical methods to solving
poverty within politics and government. This debate has carried over into the Christian community
as well, with modern day Christians falling into two categories: those who are for free market
enterprise, capitalism, and those who agree with the redistribution of wealth, socialism/communism,
for fixing the problem of poverty. In looking at both sides of the argument, it can be determined that
there is a decidedly faith–based approach to understanding the intersection of politics and
economics. One could even argue that the failure to view politics and economics through a Christian
perspective can have hazardous consequences. When mankind seeks to repair ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
This side favors a more socialistic/communisticoutlook arguing for more government intervention
and a redistribution of wealth to the masses. Although on paper, socialism/communism looks ideal;
in reality the system is ineffectual. Samuel Gregg addresses this point in his critique of Democratic
presidential candidate Bernie Sanders remarking on Sanders lack of attention to other factors of
poverty such as "...family breakdown, single–parent households, and mental illness. Addressing
these issues requires much more than just giving people more material things, and often has little to
do with economic inequality. They often require moral, even spiritual solutions." Those who
subscribe to the quixotic ideals of socialism disregard the rights of the individual to ownership.
Communism works much in the same manner attributing the source of evil to the institution of
private

Capitalism vs Socialism
Outline:
Essay question: What is the best policy for any country: capitalism or socialism?
Introduction:
Thesis statement: It is much better to live in the country where the gap between poor and rich people
is sharply noticeable, than to know that a person will never differ from the mass of people or feel a
real freedom in his/her own country.
Body:
A. Capitalistic policy gives an equal opportunity to everyone to become a wealthy person. * Person
can have his own business and develop it in the future. * The nation becomes rich B. Market
economy is the base of capitalism. * Foreign investments * Business cycle. C. Advantages of
capitalist mode showed by Adam Smith. D. Socialism lost its popularity in ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Thus, entrepreneur satisfies the demand and makes profits. Of course, there is nothing eternal and
everything will lose its importance, but the mechanism of capitalism is great. (The history of
capitalism: from feudalism to Wall Atreet, Beattie, 2011).
To justify capitalism, such a great person as Adam Smith represented five main advantages of
capitalism:
1. With little interference by the government, problems like corruption, lack of incentives and poor
information do not arise. We end up with these problems only when governments attempt to control
the economy. This is one of the main benefits of capitalism. 2. Cost effective allocation of resources
being the 'invisible hand of the market', capitalism ensures that resources are distributed according
to consumer choice. No firm is rewarded for producing goods that people don't desire.
3. Successful Production. One of the advantages of capitalism is that as firms have incentives to be
efficient in production, in a market system, cutting costs, improving competitiveness and
productivity are their top priority. They will go out of business if their efficiency and productivity
fails.
4. Dynamic Efficiency. Firms in a capitalist system need to respond to the flux in consumer
preferences and respond according to the new consumer trends. This improves and maintains their
efficiency over time. 5.

Capitalism is at the forefront of the global economy, and some of the wealthiest countries in the
world take part in that system. Many think capitalisms afford those in society an opportunity to earn
a good life because those who can provide substantial service to society in whatever capacity will be
rewarded based on merit. Proponents of capitalism think it gives equal opportunity to make
something of oneself no matter people differences because all will be on an equal playing field when
it comes to opportunity. However, many that will not receive that equal opportunity and will be
stuck on the negative side of capitalism, which was explained by Karl Marx in his essay on
Alienated labor. In this piece, Marx thinks capitalism alienates workers from the object of
production, the production process, human's species beings, and other humans. I concur because
capitalism can rob many that take part in this economic ideology of their self–worth, minimize
workers to an object, and reinforce the permittance of greed.
Many workers in a capitalistic system are disconnected from nature and fulfillment. According to
Marx, humans understand who they are and finds their fulfillment, which is their species being, in
life through their work. Animals naturally interact with nature to survive and reach their potential as
a creature without any impediment. Humans are meant to interact with nature no differently.
However, because workers in capitalism do not own the means of production,

Capitalism Vs Crony Capitalism
CRONY CAPITALISM – GENERAL ELECTRIC
The majority of people doesn ' t know the distinction of the capitalism and crony capitalism , and so
the problem starts here . People who don ' t know the distinction of these phenomenon are against to
capitalism .
Let's first , start with defining the '' Crony Capitalism '' . '' Crony capitalism '' refers to capitalist
society that's hinged on the close relationships between businessmen and the government . An
economy that is nominally free – market , but allows for preferential regulation and other favorable
government intervention based on personal relations . Instead of success being determined by a ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
''
GENERAL ELECTRIC 2001 – 2017
In October 2017 , Jeffrey Immelt announced his retirement from General Electric after being a CEO
and the chairman of the massive company that he has led since September 2001 . After Immelt 's
retirement various speculations have risen about General Electric's activities during Bush and
Obama Terms . I am investigating whether these speculations are true or they will just stay as
speculations .
Immelt was a major supporter of Obamanomics . He upheld the Obama organization ' s endeavor at
monetary jolt , the section of Obamacare , and natural controls . He has for quite some time been
one of corporate America ' s most vocal supporters of arrangements went for checking
environmental change , especially through tops on carbon discharges . In 2011 , President Barack
Obama doled out him to head another board on work creation . Amid the Bush and Obama
organizations , GE turned into the organization known as the encapsulation of " Crony Capitalism " .
" Immelt is a classic example of a rent–seeking CEO who may know what is good for his own
company but not what produces economic growth and private sector job creation , " Fred Barnes
wrote in 2011 .
Past the grasp of globalization , environmentalism , and enormous government , Immelt changed GE

Capitalism Vs Communism Essay
The source shows that within society there are those who have the heart of a capitalist which is
generous and those who have a communist heart which is greedy. The ideological perspective in this
source is that of a capitalist, because it speaks positively about capitalism and negatively about
communism which is its polar opposite. Furthermore the source specifically describes the
differences between capitalism and communism that can also exist within a christmas party. For
instance, in a communist society government controls all aspects of society and limits the actions of
individuals and corporations. Furthermore, individuals are encouraged to pursue their own self–
interests in a capitalist society, because it is believed that individuals' ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For instance, all aspects within a communist society are controlled and limited by the government.
Contrarily, individuals are encouraged to pursue their own self–interests because it is believed that
individuals' selfishness and competitiveness will improve the society within a capitalist society.
Moreover, during christmas time two types of individuals are usually evident around pile of gifts,
the first are the capitalists and the second are the communist. As a result, I agree fully with the
poster on the differences between capitalist ideologies and communist ideologies, even within our
daily

Government Capitalism Vs Socialism
Government is a well–known topic debated on over and over in life. There is no economic system
because both capitalism and socialism have their perks and downfalls. Capitalism provides a fair
economy whereas socialism shows an equal economy. Capitalists give to citizens what they deserve.
Socialists give to citizens what they need. Government limits their involvement to business in
capitalism but is in total control in socialism.
Capitalism became the dominant economic system is industrialized nations and is built in 3 major
principles. There is a limited involvement of government is a capitalist economy. This idea is known
as laissez–faire. The government refrains from getting involved in the control of businesses. Citizens
of a capitalist

Communism Vs Capitalism Essay
When it comes to the economic systems that are found in government there are a wide variety with
many different views on how a government should be ran economically. Two of the most popular
economic systems that are found throughout the world are communist and capitalist. Within these
two come many differences pertaining to how they were created and the fundamentals that they are
based on. Along with this, there is a very large difference in the kinds of government that these
economic systems are found in with capitalist economies being found in democracies and
communist being found in more central, authoritarian governments. Because of the differences that
these two systems have, it has caused much conflict between two of the most powerful ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A capitalist economic system is one that lets its citizens have their own individual rights to what
they own, how they accumulate profit, and overall how they live their lives. This means that the
citizens whose government promotes this kind of economic system can do anything with their lives
based on the funding that they have. This form of economic system promotes the use of social
classes to show whether you are in an upper, middle, or lower class and gives you the overall right
to choose what you do with your life. Of course, this freedom is granted, but there still are laws,
rules, and regulations to help guarantee that a capitalist democracy doesn't collapse. According to
William Ebenstein, the "close link between capitalism and democracy can best be seen in the fact
that both first developed in one country, Britain" (Ebenstein 139). This overall being the form of
government that the United States would adopt being why citizens are granted the rights to "life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." For citizens living in this form of government it is much
different than those living in a communist government because of the rights that are granted. Due to
the rights that citizens have, there are many who become quite successful along with many who are
not. Overall this gives an even distribution across the charts because

Capitalism Vs Communism
'Capitalism' as opposed to communism is an economy which is controlled by private individuals
rather than the government. In Britain, the development of a capitalist economy took place over the
course of six centuries. How, then, did Britain attain this free society? How did this transition from a
feudalist society occur? What factors contributed to this transition? In order to understand this
transition – we must start at the beginning– starting with the 14th through 16th centuries. Barrington
Moore, one of the world experts on the subject believes that a necessary aspect of this transition was
violence. Britain is not the only place where violence is seen as a step towards the beginning of
democracy. Another example of revolts seen is a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This was the general idea that instead of importance being gained by the amount of power a person
had, people began to see money as the key differentiator. Because of the sudden interest in income
the lord lost interest in keeping their workers on the land and decided instead to begin making
investments and accrue money instead. This change in attitude surfaced because of the growth of the
wool trade and the demand of this from other countries. This trade was easy for the lords and
provided them with wealth. Soon the lords became more interested in this than in sustaining the
peasants living with them on their land. The lords were more interested in economic prosperity than
the amount of power that they had. Additionally, now, each bit of land had more of an impact and
therefore the tenants were forced off of the land so that they could produce more. The victims of this
development were the peasants who had relied on the former order for

Essay on Capitalism Vs. Socialism
Comparisons between countries and regions before and after the advent of capitalism in Eastern
Europe, Russia and Central Europe as well as a comparison of Cuba and the ex–communist
countries provide us with an adequate basis to draw some definitive conclusions. Fifteen years of
"transition to capitalism" is more than adequate time to judge the performance and impact of
capitalist politicians, privatizations, free market policies and other restoration measures on the
economy, society and general welfare of the population.
Economic Performance: Growth, Employment and Poverty
Under communism the economic decisions and property were national and publicly owned. Over
the past 15 years of the transition to capitalism almost all basic ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Moreover economic inequalities have grown geometrically with 1% of the top income bracket
controlling 80% of private assets and more than 50% of income while poverty levels exceed 50% or
even higher. In the former USSR, especially south–central Asian republics like Armenia, Georgia,
and Uzbekistan, living standards have fallen by 80%, almost one fourth of the population has out–
migrated or become destitute and industries, public treasuries and energy sources have been
pillaged. The scientific, health and educational systems have been all but destroyed. In Armenia, the
number of scientific researchers declined from 20,000 in 1990 to 5,000 in 1995, and continues on a
downward slide (National Geographic, March 2004). From being a center of Soviet high technology,
Armenia today is a country run by criminal gangs in which most people live without central heat
and electricity.
In Russia the pillage was even worse and the economic decline was if anything more severe. By the
mid 1990's, over 50% of the population (and even more outside of Moscow and St. Peterburg –
formerly Leningrad) lived in poverty, homelessness increased and universal comprehensive health
and education services collapsed. Never in peace–time modern history has a country fallen so
quickly and profoundly as is the case of capitalist Russia. The economy was "privatized" – that is, it
was taken over by Russian gangsters led by the eight billionaire oligarchs who shipped over $200
billion dollars out of

Socialism Vs Capitalism

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jessica Tanner

More from Jessica Tanner (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Socialism Vs Capitalism