Jewelry Has A Strong Case Against Jennifer Lawson

Jewelry Has A Strong Case Against Jennifer Lawson
Memo Introduction
In paper, Greene's Jewelry has a strong case against Jennifer Lawson because Jennifer breached the
confidentiality agreements that she signed with Greene's Jewelry. In the agreement, it specifically
indicated that Jennifer could never disclose any information regarding "Ever–Gold" creating
process, which is patented and owned by Greene's Jewelry. Jennifer not only stole a draft letter that
contains the details of creating Ever–Gold but also took it to Greene's competitor Howell Jewelry
World in order to obtain a job offer from the company. The employment contract that Jennifer
signed with Howell is a certain evidence of her unjust enrichment. Regarding Jennifer Lawson's
claim that she encountered wrongful termination at Greene's, it is simply a misinterpretation of
Greene's legitimate reduction in force. The company no longer had a need for any junior executive
secretaries. The downsizing was unfortunately but legal.
Facts and Laws
Jennifer alleges that she was terminated because of her pregnancy. She neglects the fact that
Greene's discharged her because her position, junior executive secretary, is redundant to the
company. It is transparently that Jennifer is a member of protected class and was dismissed. Yet
Greene's did not violate The Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) under Title VII. According to
Title VII 42 U.S.C. § 2000e–2(a), it is an unlawful employment practice if an employer discharges
any individual because of such individual 's race,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Cjhs400 R1 Individual Case Studies Essay
University of Phoenix Material
Individual Case Studies
Case One: Violet
Violet is a 20–year–old woman with a history of difficult relationships. She was in foster care from
12 to 18 years old. She attended a career college and is employed as a dental assistant. This is her
first real job. She was referred to you after a patient at her dental office had a stalking complaint.
She apparently began dating a young man (John) after meeting him at the dentist's office.
When she arrives for her appointment with you, she is dressed provocatively in a low–cut blouse
and tight pants. She has heavy eye makeup on and seems to be very needy, becoming tearful several
times during the session.
At the start of the interview, she states that this ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They met for dinner, and she ended up going to his apartment where they had sex. She reports that
they saw each other every day for about 3 weeks, which often ended in sex. She states that he said
he needed more space and asked that they not see each other any more. She then reported trying to
get him back and calling him up to 20 times a day. He asked for a restraining order and phoned the
dentist's office asking for a referral to another dentist–he no longer felt comfortable coming into that
office. Violet has had five other restraining orders in the past.
Case Two: Max
You are completing your graduate work at a local university by participating in an internship at a
private mental health clinic. As a part of your internship, you were asked to cofacilitate a group for
men and women with relationship difficulties.
While cofacilitating the group, you meet Max, who was court ordered to participate as a result of
allegations of assault. After a careful review, you find that he has six past charges of assault. Max is
an attractive man in his mid–thirties. He is charming with both the males and female in the group.
Although it is clear that he does not feel he should be in the group, you find that he adds dimension
to it.

After some time, Max discloses that he has been involved in multiple sexual relationships and says
he "can get in any woman's pants." He also brags that he is smarter than anyone in the group,
regardless of the fact that one person has a PhD in

Greene's Jewelry Case Study Example
Memo Introduction
Greene's Jewelry, the plaintiff in the case of Greene's Jewelry v. Jennifer Lawson (2016), is owned
by Mary Jane and Allen Green and located in Derry, New Hampshire. The company was originally
started in 1957 and has expanded over the last five decades. Greene's Jewelry currently employs
over 500 individuals including Jennifer Lawson who has been employed with the company for the
past three years. Greene's Jewelry is best known for its process for creating a synthetic gold–colored
material called "Ever–Gold." Ever–Gold is resistant to scratches, discoloration, and oxidization. The
defendant in this case who was rightfully terminated, Jennifer Lawson, had been employed as a
junior executive secretary in the research and development department of Greene's Jewelry. The
defendant was let go from the company during her pregnancy because of the company's decision to
downsize which eliminated the defendant's role. Prior to the defendant's departure, it is believed the
defendant stole documents pertaining to the process of creating the company's Ever–Gold product
and released the information to one of the company's competitors, Howell Jewelry World. Although
the defendant signed a confidentiality agreement, the defendant has claimed that she was wrongfully
terminated due to her pregnancy.
In addition, please keep in mind the decision to eliminate the previous position held by the
defendant, in this case, was decided prior to the defendant notifying the company's

Gun Violence And Domestic Violence
November of this year in Rancho Tehama, California, eighteen people were injured, and five people
were killed at eight separate crime scenes including an elementary school. The gunman had charges
against him including robbery and false imprisonment, as well as assault with a deadly weapon and
was out on bail for two felonies and five misdemeanors. He was also known by the local authorities
to have a history of violence against women. Earlier this year, he was instructed to give up his
firearms due to a protective order for two women which he had a physical confrontation with in
January 2017. Else ware in the United States, more than 50 people were killed in October when a
gunman opened fire on a crowded country music concert in Las Vegas, while more than 20 people
were killed when a gunman opened fire in a Baptist church in Texas in the past few months.
The most recent mass shootings are just the latest reminder that domestic violence and guns are a
deadly combination. The link between guns and fatal domestic abuse is so strong, research shows
that just by a woman living in a state with a high rate of firearm ownership increases the risk of
being fatally shot in a domestic violence incident. Many factors contribute to the domestic violence
epidemic. The use of firearms in mass shootings usually expands the number of victims and
increases the fatalities. With the intentions on killing, if the abuser is using a gun, other people on
the scene or in the line of fire like

An Emergency Motion Filed By Sga Presidential Candidate...
A court order has ruled to deny an emergency motion filed by SGA presidential candidate Jacob
Milich in his constitutional challenge case against UCF.
The ruling was made on March 15, a day before Sen. Milich was scheduled to appear before the
SGA elections commission for alleged campaign violations.
On March 10, Milich filed a lawsuit against the University of Central Florida Board of Trustees,
UCF's Student Government Association, SGA's election commission, student body president Cait
Zona, supervisor of elections Whitney Barnes and Maribeth Ehasz, vice president of Student
Development and Enrollment Services.
The case complaint cited violations of Milich's First Amendment rights, violations to the federal
Family and Educational Rights and Privacy Act and violations of the state's Sunshine Laws,
according to court documents.
Milich requested the emergency motion in the initial filing in which he maintained that "unless he
received preliminary injunctive relief, defendants will imminently and continuously violate his
rights," according to court documents.
Although his request for injunctive relief was denied, Judge Janet Thorpe of the ninth judicial court
did grant a motion for an expedited hearing.
David Oglethorpe, communications coordinator for the Office of Student Involvement, said that
although election violation hearings have traditionally been open, the hearings scheduled to occur on
March 16 and 17 were closed.
"At the request of the client, SGA presidential

A Restraint Of Trade Clause
A restraint of trade clause is a provision inserted into an employment contract to regulate the
conduct and activities of an employer and employee once the employment relationship has ended.
Often, a restraint of trade provision prohibits a former employee from competing against the
business of the employer for a defined period of time after the termination of employment, or within
a certain geographical location. Where a restraint of trade is found to be valid but unjust, an
employee may seek recourse in equity for relief. Although, there is no one significant equitable
remedy for resisting the enforcement of restraint of trade clauses in employment contracts, certain
authorities tend to indicate that the most effective equitable remedy is an injunction, paired with
declaratory relief.
An injunction is an equitable remedy commonly used to prevent interference with equitable rights
(in its exclusive jurisdiction) or to assist in the enforcement of legal obligations (in its auxiliary
jurisdiction). The remedy will only be available where the applicant's right has been infringed and
there is no adequate remedy at law to correct the wrong (although it may be awarded in conjunction
with other remedies). Further, the remedy is discretionary.
An injunction is a remedy in which the court orders a party to perform some positive act (a
mandatory injunction) or refrain from performing a particular act (a prohibitory injunction). In a
situation where an employee

The Organization 's Structure, Mission Purpose, And Role /...
Analysis of the organization's structure, mission purpose, and role/function within the CJ System
During the Fall 2016 semester I had the opportunity to intern with Centro La Familia Advocacy
Services, Inc in Fresno, California. Centro La Familia is one of a few organizations/agencies in
Fresno County that not only provides social services, educational programs, but they also have
advocacy and intervention services in rural and urban areas in Fresno County. I was allowed to
intern within the victim services department of Centro La Familia, which is responsible in assisting
victims of all crimes.My primary task as an intern was to learn and to help the victim advocates of
Centro La Familia.Over the course of my internship I have participated in community outreach and
attended meetings. In addition, I have done numerous filings, copies, translations, interpretations
and filling out forms for clients. I worked closely with two very experienced victim advocates that
help me transition to working in this environment, but also worked with other victim advocates to
gain even more insight about the victim services they provide. Centro La Familia began as a small
agency in 1972, that served mostly in the city. Over the decades it had developed into a multi–
serving agency that serves both rural and urban areas of Fresno County. For example, they have
satellite locations in Firebaugh, Mendota, Coalinga and Kerman.These locations are attended by a
few victim advocates of Central La

The American Fear of Being Sued Essay
The American Fear of Being Sued
Something basic has been stolen from American life. We have lost much of our individual freedom
due to the theft in our society. Our thieves come in the form of "sue happy" Americans. Doctors are
paranoid, teachers are weakened and religious consultation is decreased. You would have to be a
fool to say what you really think in the workplace. Increasingly, people believe that they cannot
make a difference. Today, the medical industry has been transformed. Doctors must live by a
different code of ethics other than their oath. Legal fear has put the doctor–patient relationship in
jeopardy. Today, physicians view patients as potential malpractice litigants. Therefore, doctors order
unnecessary ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The girls mother got angry and had words with the other mother. The angry mother then sued for a
restraining order to keep the boy off the same playground. Could you believe the judge issued an
injunction? What we once considered harmless childhood play is no longer allowed on our
playgrounds. Seesaws, monkey bars, and merry–go–rounds are considered dangerous and a sign of
the past. When considering the past, faith has been an integral part of how society functions. No
matter what faith, lawsuits do not discriminate. Philip K. Howard stated, "Nothing is sacred.
Ministers now are increasingly told not to counsel troubled parishioners because, who knows,
maybe someone will sue if the couple ends up getting divorced." How can we as fellow parishioners
allow this to happen? When did we develop a fright for participating in a faith? Lets permit
ministers to counsel as they have for centuries. Church and State have always been separate, lets
keep it that way! Sociologist Orlando Patterson asked the question, "Do you think whites are afraid
of discrimination claims? Frozen with fear is more accurate." The sociologist observed, "no Euro–
American person…dare say what he or she really means." Fear of a discrimination claim
hangs over all black–white relations in the workplace. A lawsuit that favors no cultural background
is sexual harassment. Trying to be fair, American law, has shut out our ability to be ourselves in

Non Disclosure Agreement And Non Competition Agreement Essay
Non–Disclosure Agreement and Non–Competition Agreement This Employment Agreement (the
"Agreement") is entered into as of the _22nd__ day of _____December_, 2016 (the "Effective
Date"), by and between Christa Jones ("Employee") and HELPING HANDS HOME
HEALTHCARE AND STAFFING AGENCY, LLC; HELPING HANDS HOME HEALTHCARE
AND STAFFING AGENCY, LLC d/b/a ELYSIAN HOSPICE; KRAY PROPERTIES, LLC; and
KOUNTRYVIEW ESTATE, LLC, collectively Illinois Limited Liability Companies and any entity
that is wholly or partially owned by the Member or otherwise affiliated with the Member, (the
"Company"). Recitals: WHEREFORE, Company desires to employ Employee as its Manager' ; and
WHEREFORE, Employee desires to be so employed; WHEREFORE, Company desires to maintain
a level of control over the dissemination of information relating to the Company's processes,
policies, strategies, marketing, advertising, and pricing information, as well as any other kind of
information which provides the Company with a competitive advantage, whether real or perceived;
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this
Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Non–Compete: Employee agrees that he will not,
singly, jointly or otherwise, directly or indirectly, whether individually, or as a director, stockholder,
partner, owner, employee, consultant, LLC member or agent of any

Non Athletes Clauses And Confidentiality Agreements
Non–compete clauses and confidentiality agreements are very popular these days. They can be
restrictive, or nothing to worry about at all. It generally depends on the industry, the employee, and
the documents. Some have prevented people from working in their specific industry for years; some
have stayed in a folder after signing, for years. There is no rhyme or reason to them, but one thing is
certain; the company that insists on using them is trying to protect themselves, not the employee, so
it's best to read them very carefully before signing. Non–compete clauses are agreements that an
employee will not directly compete with their former company for a specific length of time.
Confidentiality agreements are agreements that an employee will not disclose private or confidential
information about the former employers' products or its process to a new employer, as asserted by
Paul Barada in Monster.com. Non–compete clauses are popular in highly competitive industries,
such as fashion design or new technology. As Jessica Hullinger described in Fast Company, Sandra
Contipelli is a woman who started her own denim company and required her designer to sign a non–
compete agreement. However, Contipelli also signed one for solidarities' sake and to her dismay
found herself constrained by it when her company sold. She was unable to do business in her
industry for five years. This was all quite legal, much to Contipelli's consternation. According to an
overview in

Gang Injunction
This week's reading was a chapter from the book Police, Power, and the Product of Racial
Boundaries by Ana Muniz analyzed the function and outcomes of gang injunctions, specifically the
Glendale Corridor Gang Injunction. From what I understood, gang injunctions were used as a
modern peculiar institution that reestablished the definition of race and normalized forms of racial
inequality to fit their societal needs. Society's wishes to gentrify lead to the displacement of certain
people of color and justified the use of violence against individuals through police action. This is
similar to slavery and the separation between white and black to justify the use of violence and
dehumanization by reducing African Americans to objects of labor when

Gangs and Injunctions
Gangs and Injunctions Criminal activities and gangs have mostly always been an on going problem
in the United States. Gangs and gang members are frequently involved with a variety of different
crimes. The 2008 National Youth Gang Survey reported that there are approximately 774,000 active
gang members in the United States (Egley, Howell, & Moore, 2010). The 2008 National Youth Gang
Survey also states that there are about 27,900 active gangs in the United States (Egley et al., 2010).
The active gangs in California have caused a major impact on the state in many ways. According to
the California Department of Justice, approximately 300,000 gang members are living in California
(Crawford, 2009). California also attributes more than 25 ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The police force may be looked at negatively for setting such heavy restrictions on regular
neighborhoods because there are injunctions set upon the area. The people from the neighborhoods
would be the individuals that believe gang injunctions should not be enforced. One of the many
problems involved with gang injunctions is that there is not a clear definition of what a gang is.
Numerous definitions of gangs have come about through the decades. For example, the 2006
National Youth Gang Survey defines a gang as "a group of youths in your jurisdiction that you are
willing to classify as a gang" (Egley, O'Donnell, 2008). This definition of a gang is very vague
because any group of youths can be seen as a gang. This definition does not always work. For
example, a group of people who share a common interest like reading books or collecting baseball
cards can be labeled as a "gang." The National Gang Center and federal law define a gang as "any
ongoing group, club, organization, or association of five or more person: A) that has as one of its
primary purposes the commission of one or more of the criminal offenses; B) the members of which
engage, or have engaged within the past five years, in a continuing series of offenses; and C) the
activities of which affect interstate or foreign commerce (Brief review of Federal and State
definitions, 2009, p.1). Another problem closely associated with gang injunctions are the violations
of constitutional rights.

Information on Laissez-faire and Court Injuction
1. Court Injuction
2. Laissez–faire
Recording to the Union County College "Laissez– faire an economic and political doctrine that
holds that economies function most efficiently when unencumbered by government regulation.
Laissez faire advocates favor individual self–interest and competition, and oppose the taxation and
regulation of commerce." ""Leave it alone" The concept came from the economic theories of Adam
Smith, the 18th–century Scot whose writings greatly influenced the growth of American capitalism.
Smith believed that private interests should have a free rein. As long as markets were free and
competitive, he said, the actions of private individuals, motivated by self–interest, would work
together for the greater good of society. Smith did favor some forms of government intervention,
mainly to establish the ground rules for free enterprise. But it was his advocacy of laissez–faire
practices that earned him favor in America, a country built on faith in the individual and distrust of
authority. Laissez–faire practices have not prevented private interests from turning to the
government for help on numerous occasions, however. Railroad companies accepted grants of land
and public subsidies in the 19th century. Industries facing strong competition from abroad have long
appealed for protections through trade policy. American agriculture, almost totally in private hands,
has benefited from government assistance. Many other industries also have sought and received

Royal Palm Beach Case Study
Timeshare Attorney
Royal Palm Beach Florida Timeshare Attorneys
Residents of Royal Palm Beach FL who are unhappily locked into a timeshare agreement are
encouraged to contact Aaronson Law Firm. We represent clients all over the state of FL, including
Royal Palm Beach.
Timeshare developers often utilize shady practices to entice individuals to agree to purchase
timeshares. This behavior often results in timeshare owners finding it nearly impossible to take
advantage of the benefits that they were promised.
Aaronson Law Firm can assist timeshare owners in Royal Palm Beach who find them in this type of
situation. They will be happy to speak with you about your situation to determine what the best
course of action will be.
With timeshare

Custody Court : The Custody
Custody Court
I decided to go through the courts to determine custody because of several reasons. The first reason
was because my son's father was on the birth certificate and, the police stated that if he took my son
from me, it would be considered kidnapping. So, it was in essence to protect my son first. Secondly,
it was part of the process of getting child support as well as my restraining order. The restraining
order was done through the civil courts and, the originally gave me full custody temporarily until the
actual custody process could begin. While, I was planning on going through the custody court at
some time, I had to begin the process early because of several court standards. Before I was able to
put my son on CCAP, I had to put his father on child support or else I would be noncompliant with
their orders. Also, with the severity of the reasons for the restraining order, the judge believed that it
was necessary for me to begin it immediately. But, going through the process, I understand why
many young mothers like me do not go through the courts to deal with this manner. To start the
custody paperwork, I had to go to the clerks for the information which told me that I had to pay a
starters fee of over two–hundred and fifty dollars. Luckily, I had a fellow friend with me who is a
family advocate whom knew how to wave the fees. There is a massive amount of paperwork to fill
out such as parenting time, financial assets, and responsibilities. The

The Civil Injunction Process Essay
Running head: THE CIVIL INJUNCTION PROCESS
The Civil Injunction Process
STUDENT'S NAME
PROFESSOR'S NAME
The Civil Injunction Process
The following scenario presents key players in any law enforcement agency, possible dialogs, inter–
agency politics, and concerns when change is proposed. The facts come from an actual experience in
Redondo Beach, California. This study is about using the "Civil Injunction Process" against street
gangs.
I believe that the North Side Protectors gang was allowed to continue with their roles and
delinquency in the community of Rio Sellas for so long because the Police Department didn't file a
civil injunction order against the gang members sooner. In the past the police department didn't put
their ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They would also get a law order to protect the entire city against the gangs in the city. With this
tempo getting started and showing positive results the Police Department was able to request other
agencies to get involved where needed. Like for instance the task force that maintained surveillance
with provided and eye on these gang members and created reports that would help the police
department know of all activities of these gangs that would result in future sting operations and
raids.
This temporary restraining order is often also called an exparte restraining order because it is
assigned in a hearing that is held without the defendant being given the opportunity to present his
case. The Temporary Restraining Order can give the gang a rapid pause on their situational
awareness. They will soon understand that they will not be able to operate as they have been in the
past. Whether they find a way around the order sanction by the Justice Department to continue doing
their crimes in the communities or they will most likely move to another city that they don't have to
deal with the Law enforcements and the orders that have been applied in the community they are
living I
While using a Temporary Restraining Order you can receive resistance from the gang members or
close family, or their lawyers saying that their rights are being violated.

Restraining Order Research Paper
We have all heard of a restraining order, and have at least a basic understanding of how they work.
Like all legal processes though, there is a complexity beneath the basic appeal of it. In order to get a
restraining order for instance, you must have an applicable reason, and a restraining order will only
be valid for so long until it either expires, or a court determines that it should stay in place. It also
depends on the situation about what form of restraining order you will get, and for how long. Some
may only last while a divorce proceeding is going on, others may be a permanent arrangement.
Before we get into the legal reasons to request a restraining order, we will get into exactly what a
restraining order is.
Restraining Order: ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They also have the same purpose, to protect someone who has been harmed, or feels threatened by
another. If you feel you fall under one of the following situations, Lauren Koleilat of Koleilat &
Miller can help you get a permanent restraining order.
Physical Abuse: If you can supply evidence that you, or your children have been harmed or
threatened with harm by another, you can file for a restraining order against the person in question.
A basic restraining order will require the person it has been filed against to stay a certain distance
from the one who filed it, as well as resist contacting them in any form. Some restraining orders can
also prohibit the person it is filed against from approaching the filers place of employment, or from
owning a firearm.
Psychological Abuse: If your spouse is constantly degrading, humiliating, or otherwise mentally
stressing you, a restraining order can be placed against them. Forms of psychological abuse can
involved the beforementioned degrading of a person, along with causing a person to live in fear of
something, turning family members against them, or tries to control your actions. A restraining order
will prohibit contact between the one who files for it and the one it is

Against Restraining Orders
Legally speaking, a restraining order works in one direction. If you file a restraining order against
someone, they are not allowed to contact you, or be in a certain distance of you. You on the other
hand, can freely contact them without violating the restraining order. While you can legally contact
them, it is highly advised not to unless absolutely necessary. Restraining orders are put in place for a
reason, and contacting the person you have filed one against may throw suspicion on your motives.
Enough contact and the one you filed a restraining order against can go to court to get the restraining
order terminated. If you are on the other end of the restraining order, having one filed against you,
then make sure you understand what all

The State Of Tennessee Defines Domestic Abuse Essay
The State of Tennessee defines Domestic Abuse as "inflicting or attempting to inflict physical injury
on an adult or minor by other than accidental means, placing an adult or minor in fear, physical
harm, physical restraint, or malicious damage to the personal property of the abused party including
inflicting, or attempting to inflict, physical injury on any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or
held by an adult or minor, or placing an adult or minor in fear of physical harm to any animal
owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by the adult or minor" (Tennessee Code Annotated §36–3–
601 (F) (3)). This definition for many civilians is open to interpretation. As many officers have
observed, verbal altercations become heated and law enforcement is called at times by a third party.
In most cases this he said, she said occurs without witnesses (willing to cooperate) or unfortunately
evidence of an assault, the officer is therefore hard pressed to make a determination as to the
primary aggressor. Many times, as I have noticed, the aggressor has left the scene by the time
officers arrive and if there is no physical sign of abuse, a report or memo is done. Although the
complainant is advised to follow through with the necessary documentation to pursue legal
remedies, they often do not either from fear of retaliation by the individual, fear of the legal system
as they have been negatively involved in some aspect of the judicial system or lack of confidence in
the legal system and

Drafting Note For Recitals ( A )
Drafting Note to RECITALS (a) Confidentiality agreements typically do not describe the
contemplated transaction in detail to avoid the implication that the parties have come to any
agreement on the terms of the transaction. Nonetheless, the definition of "Transaction" should be
drafted carefully to prevent potential misuse by the Receiving Party of the Disclosing Party's
information. For instance, the Receiving Party may abandon negotiations and launch a hostile bid
for the Disclosing Party using the Disclosing Party's information in formulating the bid. This form
defines "Transaction" as a negotiated transaction, and thus the use by the Receiving Party of the
Disclosing Party's information to launch a hostile bid would be a breach of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The definition of "Proprietary Information" in this form provides that information can be considered
Proprietary Information regardless of whether it is marked "confidential." Including such a provision
can help the parties avoid an overly burdensome diligence process and any accidental failures to
mark information as confidential. Drafting Note to Paragraph 1(a) This provision contains each
party's confidentiality and non–disclosure obligations with respect to the Proprietary Information. It
also permits each party to disclose the other party's Proprietary Information to its Representatives
who need to know such information in order to advise such party in doing the deal. Each party will
want to ensure that the other party's Representatives are also bound not to disclose the Proprietary
Information. Note that some parties may be uncomfortable with explicitly assuming responsibility
for any breach of this agreement by its Representatives. The party may require certain of its
Representatives to enter into a joinder or separate confidentiality agreement with the Disclosing
Party. Alternatively, each party may

Legal Professional Personal Values And Ethics
Ethics
Introduction
What is ethics, and what does it have to do with personal and professional points of view? This
paper will address how one's personal and/or professional point of view influence ethical decisions
in the work place and the leadership traits that are necessary to make those decision. Also provided
in this paper will be several examples of cases where individual personal point of view caused them
to make professional decisions that had an adverse reaction on those they serve.
Ethics Defined
Black law dictionary defines ethics as; 1. A system of moral tenets or principles; the collective
doctrines relating to the ideals of human conduct and character. 2. The study of behavior as judged
by moral right and wrong, including ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The second condition for ethical dilemma is that there must be different courses of action to choose
from. Tyler has to decide whether to refuse to work on the case, because it goes against his values,
but prevents him from fulfilling his professional responsibilitiy or working on the case ,and
compromising his personal values for his professional responsibility. Third, in an ethical dilemma,
no matter what course of action is taken, some ethical principle is compromised. In other words,
there is no perfect solution. Either decision bares consequences for the individual making them,
consequences that they alone must endure.
Brown et al, propose that leaders become attractive, credible, and legitimate as ethical role models
in part by engaging in ongoing behaviors that are evaluated by followers as normatively appropriate,
and that suggest altruistic (rather than selfish) motivation (2005, p. 120).
The following court cases offers a view of individuals in positions of leadership who stood by their
convictions, and chose to live with the consequence of those decisions.
Ethics
Personal views v. Professional views
In the summer of 2015, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
David ERMOLD and David Moore, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Kim DAVIS, Individually and in her
Official Capacity as Rowan County Clerk, Defendant–Appellee.
No. 16–6412 Decided: May 02, 2017 Kim Davis, the County Clerk for Rowan County, Kentucky,
generated national and international

Case Study Of Edina Broward's Facts
The statute of limitations does not prevent Edina Broward from bringing an action against Dr.
Warren in order to return her stolen painting if Edina makes diligent efforts to search for her
painting. Relevant Facts Supporting Edina Broward's Position Everett v. Rogers Facts My client's
Facts The defendant informed the police about the theft and was going to hire a private investigator
No inquiry was made about the painting before it was sold. IFAR was informed by the defendant
after he found out about it. Edina reported the theft to the police as well as hiring private
investigator. Letters describing the painting were sent to art museums, some of local art dealers and
auction houses. Edina offered $25,000 to obtain useful information related

The Universal Declaration Of Human Rights
In accordance with article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, created in 1948,
American citizens are entitled to, "the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and
wellbeing of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and
necessary social services..." (Universal Declaration of Human Rights). This declaration also goes on
to give a special mention to mothers and children, and their need for additional assistance. With this
in mind, states commonly have many health policies to protect these human rights described in the
above declaration. However, some states go against this declaration by restricting access to certain
health services, namely abortion, on the basis of moral, political, or religious objection. In the
following pages the topic of reproductive rights will be broached, and the associated cases that are
centered on both sides of the issue will be discussed. While most health related policies and laws
aim to protect the health of women, some serve to impede access to health services and cause harm
to women through a lack of access to care. The issue of women 's autonomy and ability to make
their own reproductive decisions has been a polarizing subject since the dawn of the women 's rights
movement. One of the landmark cases for reproductive rights is Roe v. Wade, in which an unmarried
pregnant woman brought a class action suit against the state of Texas ' abortion laws which made it a
criminal offense

A Short Note On Non Disclosure Agreement ( Nda )
4.708 International Business Law assignment1
Wang anqi 20142345
Summaries of non–disclosure agreement
A non–disclosure agreement (NDA), also known as a confidentiality agreement (CA), is a legitimate
contract between no less than two that frameworks secret material, learning, or information that the
parties wish to impart to each other for specific purposes, yet wish to limit access to or by outsiders.
It is an agreement through which the parties concur not to unveil information secured by the
assertion. A NDA makes a classified relationship between the parties to secure any sort of private
and exclusive information or prized formulas. In that capacity, a NDA remedies nonpublic business
information. (Non–disclosure agreement, 2015)
Non–disclosure is made under the will of the organizations and contracted between no less than two
parties. For the most part, parties comprise of a boss and a worker, however there could be more
unpredictable parties, for example, such as partners, subcontractors or even the Board of the
company. The context are connected changes from job to ensuring privacy of mergers and
acquisitions, joint endeavors and different business exchanges.
The most common and obvious is a non–disclosure agreement. A non–disclosure agreement, also
known as confidentiality agreement, confidential disclosure agreement, proprietary information
agreement, or secrecy agreement, is an agreement between an employer and a former employee that
forces

Pros And Cons Of Discharge Of Contract
Discharge of contract can be defined as the termination of a contractual relationship between the
parties. A contract may be discharged by agreement, frustration, performance or breach. 2.0.1
Discharge by agreement A contract may be discharge by agreement, where, both party agreed to
discharge the contract or end the contract without any unsatisfying feeling. Under section 64 of the
Contracts Act 1950 (Act 136), it is stated that every promisee may dispense with or cancel, wholly
or in part, the performance of the promise made to him, or may extend the time for such
performance, or may accept instead of it any satisfaction which he thinks fit. 2.0.2 Discharge by
frustration A contract is frustrated when after the contract is made, the contract become unlawful or
impossible to perform. There are some events that the promisor could not prevent from such as
natural ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The defendants were informed that "the article to be carried was the broken shaft of a mill, and the
plaintiffs were the millers of the mill." As a result of the delayed delivery, the plaintiffs' mill was
inoperable for much longer that it would have been without delay. The plaintiffs' claim for loss of
profits as rejected by the court on the ground that it was too remote. Under the first limb, the losses
suffered by the plaintiffs were not the natural consequence of the defendants' breach; where the
court found that in a great majority cases, the mill–owner would probably have another shaft. Under
second limb, the loss of profits was not within the contemplation of both parties at the time they
made the contract, the plaintiff did not mention that his mill not able to operate without the shaft. In
determining what was reasonably foreseeable by the parties, regard must be had to the knowledge
possessed by the

Education Act 1996 Case Study
1.1.8 The Education Act 1996 Education Act 1996 places a legal duty on the parent or guardian of a
child aged five to sixteen years (known as compulsory school age), to ensure that their children or
child attends and receives full–time education, either in a traditional school or any other means that
is appropriate for their age, ability, and aptitude, taking into account any special needs they may
have. The Act makes it a criminal offense for a parent or guardian to take their child out of school
without authorisation from the school, and an offense for parents who are aware that their child is
failing to attend school to not take reasonable action to ensure that the child attends. The offense of
failing to ensure regular attendance at school is punishable by up to three months' imprisonment
and/or fine up to one thousand pounds. 1 Where a child is not attending school regularly, the Local
Education Authority (LEA) has the option of taking criminal or civil action against the parent or
guardian. It may then decide to mount a prosecution for breach of s 444 of the 1996 Act, just as it
can for breach of s 443. Before the 1989 Children Act, the LEA was obliged to consider whether it
was appropriate to bring care proceedings based on truancy and failure by the parent or guardian. A
review by DHSS reasoned that care proceedings were inappropriate where the problem was the
child's absenteeism. Where the child's absences were part of the wider family problem and the child

The Legal Team Of Greene 's Jewelry
5. Greene's Jewelry will prove that they did not wrongfully discharge Ms. Lawson in light of her
pregnancy news by submitting documents backing their decision to remove the junior secretary
position. The Application of the Law to the Facts We the legal team of Greene's Jewelry has the
opportunity to evaluate all the necessary details of the case and overlooked what the strengths and
weaknesses of our argument would be presented in the Court. To assist our argument we have
decided to utilize the regulations, substantive laws and case laws. The case precedents will provide
multiple directions for the arguments to be assessed in the Court. Greene's Jewelry is more likely to
receive a favorable judgment by applying these laws, in the claim against Ms. Lawson. After
numerous evaluations and examinations, we the legal team has assessed the elements of the case and
concluded that the primary reason of the lawsuit against Ms. Lawson is due to her breach of the
non–disclosure agreement. The manner in which Ms. Lawson violated her contract depicts her true
intention in her activities. Ms. Lawson's behavior led to an interruption in Greene's Jewelry daily
business operation process. Howell acquired confidential information from Ms. Lawson on Greene's
secret trade process of Ever–Gold makes it a criminal offense. The State of New Hampshire has
established laws to "protect private and public bodies from misappropriation of secret trades; these
are laws that copy the Federal Uniform

Legal Aid In Criminal Justice
One thing that needs to be changed within the civil justice system is a victims right to counsel,
especially involving domestic violence victims that have a low–income. The President of the Legal
Services Corporation, James J. Sandman quotes that "Most Americans don't realize that you can
have your home taken away, your children taken away and you can be a victim of a domestic
violence, but have no constitutional right to a lawyer to protect you" Basically, the abuser is entitled
to free legal assistance if they are charged with a crime, but there is no legal right to an attorney for
victims that try to get a restraining order or a protective order in civil cases. As the article would say,
"there is no right to counsel in civil cases." Victims ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Communities should work together, communicate, organize and help their fellow neighbor more
often. It is great to see that some victim assistance programs are funded through good will
contributions. However, sadly we live in a world where a large majority are consumed with
selflessness, or are forced to do so to live.
References
Bergmark, M. (2016, January 4). How to reduce domestic violence with legal assistance. Fox News.
Retrieved from http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/01/04/how–to–reduce–domestic–violence–
with–legal–assistance.html
Legal Services Corporation. (2017). The unmet need for legal aid. Retrieved February 15, 2017,
from America's Partner for Equal Justice, http://www.lsc.gov/what–legal–aid/unmet–need–legal–aid
Rizos, C. (2016, May 17). MLAC urges state senate to increase investment in civil legal aid –
Massachusetts legal assistance corporation. Retrieved February 15, 2017, from Massachusetts Legal
Assistance Corporation, http://mlac.org/mlac–urges–state–senate–to–increase–investment–in–civil–
legal–aid–2/
Voices for Civil Justice. (2013). What is Civil Legal Aid? Retrieved February 15, 2017, from

Kristin Lardner's Case Study Essay example
Kristin Lardner's Case Study
MPA 5400
Public Administration Theory
Abstract
There are two main theories in public administration that apply to Kristin Larnder's case study. They
are the bureaucracy theory and the client responsiveness theory. In this paper these theories will be
discussed in detail as to how they relate to public administration theory. The internal and external
environment relationships of Kristin's case will also be discussed. Public administration affected this
case study greatly and there were many factors that could have been prevented, but instead led to
Kristin's murder. There are many theories that ultimately should have been applied to Kristin's case
study that could have prevented her murder.
Table ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Rose Ryan was granted a restraining order against Michael Cartier, but it took the police over a
month to pick Cartier up and arrest him. Cartier was in and out of mental hospitals on several
occasions and finally he was sentenced to prison for a year, but only had to serve 6 months. He still
stalked Rose from prison and he had some of the inmates write her obscene letters. Cartier was
released from prison on good behavior, but immediately began violating his probation by injecting a
vial of blood into a ketchup bottle in a restaurant. He should have served 6 months in jail for that
incident and a burglary incident, but the charges were dropped and he only had to serve 49 days in
jail (Stillman, 2010).
While dating Kristin, Cartier continued to harass Rose Ryan. Cartier was ordered to appear in the
Boston Municipal court for violating his probation and for contacting Ryan while he was still in jail.
Instead of being sentenced to serve the year in jail that he received for attacking Rose Ryan with
scissors, he was ordered to attend an anger management class called, Alternatives for Violence. It
was a six week class that was strictly educational. It did not involve any type of therapy. It taught
people how to handle stress without using violence. Cartier showed up for the first class, skipped the
second class, and then his probation was revoked for skipping the class. Yet again Cartier had to
appear in court

Child Abuse Case Study Michelleman
Michelle Coleman is a 25–year–old Caucasian divorced mother of three children ranging from ages
1 to 6. She is currently receiving services at The Arc of Bradford. Michelle has been divorced from
her ex–husband James for three months due to domestic violence. There has been several incidents
reported to the police and she now has a standing restraining order against James, he is prohibited
from seeing her and the children. Michelle and her three child have been receiving regular public
assistance to include housing vouchers, food stamps, and she is also utilizing the TANF program to
enable her in providing for the children without the assistance of ex–husband James. Michelle is a
high school graduate but has never worked. With aid from the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Michelle states that he started drinking once the child was born, but was never physically abusive
just yelling and put downs in front of the children. She states that his drinking had gotten worst
when she became pregnant with the second child and so did the abuse. He begin to get in her face
more, which soon became physical leaving bruises. Over the years the abuse would slow down but
did not stop. Michelle is afraid for the safety of herself and her children. The oldest two children had
made statements of hating their father and wanting mommy to move away so they can be a happy
family. Michelle states that she had not heard from James for some time but thinks that him
receiving the papers in the mail concerning her requesting sole custody of the children may be the
cause of him seeking her out. Michelle states that she final has gotten her life on track and is afraid
he will hurt her or the children. During her initial session Michelle reviewed and signed an Intake
Form stating in writing that her ex–husband James is not to have access to her file information.
According to NOHS (2015) Standard 3: "Human service professionals protect the client's right to
privacy and confidentiality except when such confidentiality would cause serious harm to the client
or others, when agency guidelines state otherwise, or under other stated conditions (e.g., local, state,
or federal laws). Human service professionals inform clients of the limits of confidentiality prior to
the onset of the helping

The Legal Team Of Greene 's Jewelry Essay
We the legal team of Greene's Jewelry have the opportunity to evaluate all the necessary details of
the case and overlooked what the strengths and weaknesses of our argument would be presented to
the Court. To assist our argument we have decided to utilize the regulations, substantive laws and
case laws. The case precedents will provide multiple directions for the arguments to be assessed in
the Court. Greene's Jewelry is more likely to receive a favorable judgment by applying these
resources in the claim against Ms. Lawson. After numerous evaluations and examinations, we the
legal team has assess the elements of the case and concluded that the primary reason of the lawsuit
against Ms. Lawson is due to her breach of the non–disclosure agreement. The demeanor in which
Ms. Lawson violated her contract depicts her true intention in her activities. Ms. Lawson's behavior
led to an interruption in Greene's Jewelry daily business operation process. With Greene's biggest
competitor, Howell acquiring confidential information from Ms. Lawson on their secret trade
process of Ever–Gold makes it a criminal offense. The State of New Hampshire has established laws
to "protect private and public bodies from misappropriation of secret trades; these are laws that copy
the Federal Uniform Trade Secrets Act" (Stim, 2016). There is a patent on the information shared by
Ms. Lawson, which contain the secret trade process of Ever–Gold. By providing Howell's with the
stolen patent information makes

The Battle Of The Attack Of Pharmaceutical Company
It's been nearly 2 weeks now and his family hadn't heard a word. Were they wrong? Did they not
understand the situation? Was this person not as important as they had believed him to be? He was
tired of waiting. They had practically destroyed his entire family. The start of the hostile takeover of
his parents' pharmaceutical company was vicious and was only the beginning and had yet to stop or
slow down. One of their family members company after another were falling like flies near a bug
zapper and all anger was pointed at him. They had tried court injunctions to forestall the purchase of
stock and tried to use the assault charges they had as a not so subtle way of forcing his family to
drop the charges, but it was countered by asking for a court date to show cause for the attack. The
attorneys for their side was quick to point out the vicious and continue acts on his part which was
the emotional damage it had caused to his daughter that would give any father reason to think
unreasonable. In other words, there was no father who loved his daughter deeply wouldn't have done
the same or worse. They also pointed out that this same person just happens to be the same man who
was still trying to marry his daughter. They wanted an immediate ruling by a judge for their motion
to have the whole situation ruled a domestic disturbance. His attorney stressed strongly that if this
were too happened the best that would occur is a fine and a restraining order against her father.

Disadvantages Of Antitrust Law
Chief Justice Roberts stated courts in the U.S. have historically granted injunctions upon a finding
of infringement since the 19th century. The Antitrust Division in the U.S. also admits a patent
owner's "rights to exclude are similar to the rights enjoyed by owners of other forms of private
property" in the Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property. Therefore, as a
fundamental principle, "antitrust law does not generally prohibit the holder of any other property
right from seeking an injunction to vindicate that right." The FTC has the right to regulate "unfair
methods of competition" and "unfair or deceptive acts or practices" under Section 5 of the Federal
Trade Commission Act. During the past two decades, the FTC has been heavily involved in several
high–profile SEP disputes, including Dell Computer Corp., N–Data, Rambus Inc. v. FTC, Motorola
Mobility, and Bosch GmbH. The FTC generally invokes competition law as a basis for investigation
over these cases under Section 2 of the Sherman Act and Section 7 of the Clayton Act. The
particular concern ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These consent agreements mostly impose strict requirements for an SEP holder to seek injunctive
relief. For example, in Bosch GmbH, the FTC dictated that Bosch GmbH can only seek injunctions
against an unwilling licensee. The unwilling licensee shows unwillingness by refusing to accept the
SEP holder's offer of a license on F/RAND terms, or a court's determination. In Motorola Mobility,
the order prohibits Google/Motorola from making any future claims for injunctions over a F/RAND
Patent against a potential licensee. This unwilling licensee similarly should refuse (1) a F/RAND
offer either in writing or in sworn testimony, (2) a court order, (3) a binding arbitration–determined
F/RAND terms, or (4) simply not replying to the written confirmation requested in a F/RAND
Terms from an SEP

Applicability of Greene’s Jewelry Wholesale, Llc vs....
TO: Supervisor FROM: Andrew ToussaintDATE: January 27, 2016RE: Applicability of Greene's
Jewelry Wholesale, LLC vs. Lawson MEMO INTRODUCTION Jennifer Lawson, who was
rightfully terminated during Greene's Jewelry Wholesale's downsizing effort for consistent tardiness
throughout her three years of employment with Greene's Jewelry Wholesale, breached the
confidentiality agreement to not share any information regarding the process used to create "Ever–
Gold," by sharing key process elements in producing Ever–Gold to a competing business named
Howell Jewelry World. Ever–Gold is the primary asset of Greene's and is sold exclusively through
Greene's. Greene's employed 502 individuals and was exclusively located to the state of New ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Lawson agrees and physically hands over the Ever–Gold's patent draft to Naomi White, the hiring
manager employed with Howell. Laws Defining Unlawful Termination and Contracts Regarding
Unlawful Termination: New Hampshire is considered to be a "work at will" state. Which means an
employee can be terminated at any time for any reason. Of course there are exceptions to this rule,
specifically regarding the following acts, which are pertinent to Lawson's termination. New
Hampshire is covered under the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN)
Act. Greene's falls under the WARN act since it employs more than 100 full time employees, or 100
employees that work a combined 4000 hours a week. WARN explicitly states that if a reduction of
33% or more of employees are laid off in a 90 day period, then a 60 day notice is required. New
Hampshire also has its own mini WARN Act, which covers the same basic principles with some
slight alterations to suite smaller businesses. In either case Greene's falls under both the federal and
New Hampshire's WARN act. New Hampshire also falls under the federal Family and Medical
Leave Act (FMLA), which states that once the employee meets certain criteria that employee is
allowed to take up to 12 weeks of leave every 12 months to recuperate from serious health
conditions,

The Safety Of The Client
First, assess the situation and evaluate the critical needs to be addressed. o The safety of the client is
first. o Regardless of client's disorders one must believe, the client believes that the physical and
financial abuse occurred.
Stabilize the client and have her explain what occurred on the night she left her home at 4am to go
and sleep in a shelter. o The client states to her counselor the attendant violently shook her awake
and spoke to her in in a psychotic manner and client said money has been missing from her home
too. o Client stated she did report the physical abuse to the workers at the shelter, where she spent
the night. o Shelter reported the matter to the police;
 Client would not file a report and said she was worried about attendant losing her job (more than
most likely, client may have feared loneliness, since she has abandonment issues).
 Police did not file a report about the accusations of abuse, since the client would not press
charges.
Counselor knows this client is in possible danger o It is necessary to remind the client, the counselor
is a mandated reporter. o It will be required to report physical and, or financial abuse, if proven, for
the safety of the client. o Share with great care, the importance of protecting the client with the
client.
Due to this client having schizoaffective disorder, PTSD and abandonment issues and has had no
known incidents of recent alcohol or drug use; o For the safety and well–being

Essay about Gang Injunctions
1
First California, Then Utah, Should Idaho Follow Suit?
Effectiveness and Constitutionality of Gang Injunctions
Ryan Jacobsen*
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1
GENERAL STANDARD FOR ISSUING AN INJUNCTION .................................... 3
WHAT IS A CIVIL GANG INJUNCTION? ............................................................... 4
HISTORY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF GANG INJUNCTIONS .............................. 6
A. Brief History ........................................................................................................... 6
B. Effectiveness ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
a, New Mexico, and Illinois.9 It is further estimated that, on average, gang members in the United
States commit approximately 50% of total violent crimes, while some states and jurisdictions report
much larger percentages.10 California and Illinois, who rank closely with Idaho, report that gang
members commit approximately 90% of violent crimes in their states.11 These violent crimes
include assault, extortion, home invasions, drug trafficking, homicide, weapons trafficking,
intimidation, shootings, etc.12 Other crimes routinely committed by gang members include
vandalism, graffiti, personal drug possession, petty theft, and simple assault.13 Law enforcement is
also beginning to report a recent evolution in criminal–gang activity from traditional gang crimes to
alien smuggling, human trafficking, prostitution, and even white–collar crimes.14
Idaho law enforcement emphasizes that the majority of gang–related crimes in Idaho come from
local, neighborhood–based gangs,15 which pose the greatest threat to communities according to the
national gang threat assessment–greater than national–level street gangs, prison gangs, and outlaw
motorcycle gangs.16 Idaho has a gang task force, known as the Treasure

Valley Metro Gang Taskforce, to help tackle the gang violence problem in the Boise area, known as
Treasure Valley.17 While gang–related drive–by shootings have become common in Treasure
Valley, it is estimated that communities outside that geographical area are only

Proprietary Business Information is Confidential
Not every report, memo, e–mail or plan is a secret; however, there are some kinds of business
information that we cannot share with anyone outside of our company – sometimes not even with
other employees outside of a small team. Any information that we must protect is referred to as
proprietary business information or confidential information. We continually gather, store, retrieve,
and analyze a large volume of information that we use for many purposes. Requests for information
arrive from many sources – both within the company and from outside the company – via e–mail,
telephone inquiries, surveys, during meetings with customers and vendors. We share some
information in the course of conducting business, while other information is closely guarded. This is
true whether the information was gathered from customers, vendors and partners, or if it was
generated within the company, as plans, designs and reports. Although it is essential to be able have
ready access to information and to share it when necessary, we must take steps to ensure that we
protect confidential information because: It is good business. It is the right thing to do. It is required
by law. Failure to properly secure and protect confidential business information can result in a loss
of business or clients: Disclosing confidential business information that provides an economic
benefit or competitive advantage may result in a financial loss. Disclosing sensitive business
information can result in lost trust,

Essay on comm 320
Cases Comm 315
Case1 : King v.BioChem Therapeutic Inc. Fact: Dr King is hired by Bio Chem. She signed a special
contract that specifies a period of probation. During this period, she can be let go but you have to be
known the wrong behavior in order to be able to rectify it. If the wrong behavior persists then your
contract will be terminated.
Issue: Is the termination of the contract of Dr King for fault justified?
Ratio
Employer version of facts:
1st meeting: after 5 months and a half, during this meeting, the management team are saying that
they told her that she was being unsubordinated
2nd meeting: after 10 months, the management team told her that her behavior was still being not
acceptable and that constitutes a second ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hasanie is arguing that Dynergie is not a competitor of Kaufel.
He is also arguing that he asked his direct superior if he could take this opportunity, and he agreed.
However, the direct supervisor is denying. There is not writing evidence of this authorization.
The last argument of Hasanie is that he was a victim of constructive dismissal. Basically a
constructive dismissal happens when an employer changes your working environment, inviting you
to leave. However, Kaufel argues that they offered opportunities for growth within the group and
that Hasanie was only waiting for his package. Finally they are arguing that they needed more time
to reorganize the group and assign responsibilities.
The judges conclude that Hasanie did not establish his case of having been dismissed without cause,
or having been constructively dismissed.
Case 4: CopyFax v. Lambert
The different injunctions
Institution of Proceeding Final Judgement
Provisional Injunction Interlocutory Injunction Permanent Injunction
The provisional injunction is given based on emergency criterias. It is used to maintain the status
quo. The provisional injunction is valid for 10 days. Within these 10 days, the individual has to

The Issue Of Domestic Violence Homicides Or Gun Surrender...
B. Interview format:
In an attempt to better understand the barriers in getting perpetrators to surrender their guns, and the
possible solution in remedying them, I conducted interviews with different members of the King
County community. The goal of these interviews was to generate information regarding the
experiences of DV victims, and their advocates as well as law enforcement agencies on the issue of
gun surrendering. Interviews were done primarily in person with the attorneys, and primarily over
the phone with the DV advocates. Due to the political sensitivity of this issue, the majority of the
interviewees have requested to remain anonymous.
C. Interview Questions:
The following questions guided each interview: Background:
1. Can you tell us a bit about the work you currently do, and how it is related to the issue of
domestic violence homicides or gun surrender laws?
a. How long have you been working in this capacity?
b. In which County has most of your work been in?
c. How often do you work with clients that are the victims of Domestic Violence?
2. Did any of your clients have a judge order their perpetrators to surrender their weapons, and if so,
can you tell me about an instance where this has happened?
Recent Policy Changes and their impact:
3. Washington enacted a law in 2014 that mirrors federal law by prohibiting gun possession by
anyone subject to a protective order. The protective order must have been issued after a noticed
hearing

Jewelry Has A Strong Case Against Jennifer Lawson

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jessica Tanner

More from Jessica Tanner (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Jewelry Has A Strong Case Against Jennifer Lawson