SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 33
Download to read offline
Brightcove whitepaper-online-video-and-media-industry-q2-2010
Background ........................................................................................................... 3
Methodology ......................................................................................................... 3
Key Findings ......................................................................................................... 4
      Online Video Streams .................................................................................... 4
      Engagement .................................................................................................. 5
      Discovery ....................................................................................................... 5
      Distribution & Engagement ............................................................................ 6
      Special Feature: Brand Marketers & On-Site Video Initiatives ...................... 6
Platform Usage ..................................................................................................... 7
   Video Stream Trend Data.................................................................................. 7
   Player Loads – Q2 2010.................................................................................... 9
Engagement, Discovery, Geography and Distribution ........................................ 11
   Discovery......................................................................................................... 12
   Distribution....................................................................................................... 13
   Geography....................................................................................................... 16
Special Feature: Brand Marketers & On-Site Video Initiatives ........................... 18
   Discovery......................................................................................................... 20
   Distribution....................................................................................................... 20
   Geography....................................................................................................... 22
   Brand Manager Survey Results ...................................................................... 24
      Online Video Investment.............................................................................. 23
      Online Video Strategy .................................................................................. 25
      Mobile Video Initiatives ................................................................................ 27
      Distribution & Social Media .......................................................................... 31




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                                                      Page 2
Background
Brightcove is an on-demand software platform that media companies and
marketers use to publish and distribute video on the Web, mobile devices, and
Internet-connected TVs. Brightcove has more than 1,800 customers in 48
countries, which operate video across nearly 10,000 websites, including many of
the most popular news and entertainment destinations on the Web.


TubeMogul is an online video analytics and advertising platform that processes
billions of video streams every month from the Internet’s top publishers. More
than 200,000 users rely on TubeMogul’s distribution and analytics, and hundreds
of marketing agencies and brand advertisers are among the company’s clients.


Brightcove and TubeMogul have teamed up to develop a new online video index
and quarterly research report, which will help identify key industry trends and
answer questions about the state of the industry.




Methodology
The data used for the analysis included in this report was taken from a cross-
section sample of Brightcove customers representing media industry verticals.
While the sample aggregates a sizable data set, it is not intended to be
statistically representative of the online video industry as a whole, or of
Brightcove’s entire customer base. Instead, the data analysis is intended to
provide a directional snapshot of media trends and inform additional research
initiatives focused on the online video industry.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                     Page 3
This research report draws on a number of data sources:


•   Platform data from a sample of Brightcove media customers; and
•   Consumer engagement reports based on TubeMogul’s online video analytics
    from this aggregate data set.


In this Q2 research report, Brightcove and TubeMogul have included a special
feature focused on brand marketers and on-site video initiatives. This analysis
uses:


•   Platform data from a sample of Brightcove brand marketing and e-commerce
    customers; and
•   An anonymous survey of more than 300 senior-level brand managers from
    leading business-to-business and consumer brands, including dozens of
    Fortune 500 companies.


Key Findings
Online Video Streams
Newspaper online video growth surges

•   In Q2, broadcast networks and pure-play Web media properties remained in
    the top two positions among media industry verticals for overall video stream
    growth.
•   Online video streams from newspaper websites surged in Q2 by more than
    65 percent. This can be attributed to the sustained coverage of the BP oil
    disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, which started on April 20th and ran through May
    and June.
•   Video stream growth slowed among magazine website properties, as well as
    music label and artist websites in Q2.

© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                   Page 4
Engagement
More people watching more videos

•   The volume of unique viewers accessing online video grew across all media
    verticals in Q2 by an average of 2.8 percent per month compared to .05
    percent month-over-month growth in Q1.
•   Viewers watched 11.8 percent more videos per month in Q2 than last quarter.
•   In Q2, across media verticals, the average viewing time per video stream was
    2:00 minutes.
•   Broadcast networks and magazine websites saw an increase in the average
    length of viewing time per video in Q2 by 3.1 percent and 2.1 percent
    respectively.
•   The online video content of media companies has an average completion rate
    of 38 percent per video view. Magazine website and pure-play Web media
    properties had the highest overall completion rates per video view.



Discovery
Referral traffic for online video from Facebook and Twitter growing faster than
search engines

•   Google continues to generate the highest volume of traffic to online video
    content followed by Yahoo!, Facebook, Bing and Twitter.
•   Referral traffic from Facebook and Twitter is growing faster than traditional
    search engines as a source of video views. At current rates, Facebook will
    surpass Yahoo! within the year to be second only to Google in referral traffic
    to online video content for media companies.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                    Page 5
Distribution & Engagement
On-site viewing generates deeper engagement than syndicated video players

•   Broadcast networks have the smallest percentage of video content viewed
    through embedded players on third-party websites. Newspapers, on the other
    hand, have the highest percentage of off-site viewing.
•   For the majority of media verticals, viewers watching videos via off-site player
    embeds tend to watch fewer minutes per stream than on-site viewers.
•   Facebook and Twitter generate the most engaged viewing audiences for
    online video content from media companies, followed by Bing, Yahoo!, and
    Google.

Special Feature: Brand Marketers & On-Site Video Initiatives


Platform Data

•   Viewers in Q2 watched brand marketing and e-commerce videos an average
    of 1:04 minutes per stream, compared to 2:00 minutes per stream of online
    video content from media companies.
•   2.6 percent of views for brand marketing and e-commerce video content was
    viewed off-site through embedded video players on third party sites as
    compared to 6.5 percent of off-site video for media companies
•   The average length of brand and e-commerce video views via embedded
    players on third-party sites in Q2 was 1:42 minutes compared to 1:02 minutes
    on the brand websites. By contrast, media companies generated an average
    of 1:00 minute per view for video content on third-party sites compared to an
    average of 2:00 minutes per view on the official news and entertainment
    websites.
•   Referral traffic from Facebook and Twitter lead to the longest viewing times,
    while the video views that originate from Yahoo! search and display ads tied
    for shortest.



© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                    Page 6
Survey Results

•   For the vast majority of brand managers (85 percent), website video is
    currently part of their marketing mix. More than 60 percent say they plan to
    invest more in on-site video initiatives in the next 12 months.
•   Survey respondents indicated that the primary purpose for their on-site video
    initiatives is branding and awareness (66 percent) followed by direct response
    / lead generation (21 percent) and e-commerce / sales (12 percent).
•   Brand managers have embraced blended distribution strategies with 80
    percent including video on their own brand sites, as well as YouTube and 90
    percent distributing video through Facebook.
•   While only 21 percent of brand managers indicated that their current mobile
    app strategy included video, 70 said they plan to add video to their mobile
    apps over the next 12 months.


Platform Usage
The following analysis is based on aggregated Brightcove platform data from a
sample of more than 200 media companies representing media industry verticals,
including broadcast networks, magazine publishers, music labels, newspaper
publishers, pure-play Web media properties, and radio broadcasters. The data
set spans 2008 to 2009, as well as the first half of 2010.



Video Stream Trend Data

Broadcast remains top media vertical for online video streams

In Q2, broadcast networks maintained their top position among media verticals
for the ninth consecutive quarter with 406 million online video streams. Video
stream totals for broadcasters in Q2 represent a 25 percent increase compared
to the same quarter last year.


© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                   Page 7
Pure-play Web media properties in second place, newspapers gaining

Pure-play Web media properties continue to show strong growth with nearly 300
million video streams in Q2. While relatively flat over the past five quarters, online
video streams surged in the newspaper vertical more than 65 percent to almost
225 million between Q1 and Q2 of this year as a result of the sustained coverage
of the BP oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, which started on April 20th and ran
through May and June.


Video stream growth slows for magazine publishers and music labels

After eight consecutive quarters of growth, online video streams for magazine
publishers declined by seven percent between Q1 to Q2 of this year. Despite the
decline, Q2’s 174 million video streams represent a 45 percent increase
compared to the same period last year. In the music sector, Q2 brought a
sharper decline of almost 40 percent in video stream volume from artist and label
sites with 134 million streams. This significant reduction in overall online video
stream volume on music label and artist sites could be attributable to the growing
popularity of the VEVO.com music video portal. Music label and artist stream
totals are still up by 13 percent compared to the same quarter last year.


Radio broadcasters continue steady growth in online video streams

Q2 of 2010 marked the tenth consecutive quarter of growth for the radio
broadcast sector with 9 million video streams.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                     Page 8
Player Loads – Q2 2010
A player load represents the graphics, data and other components rendered on a
webpage in order to view a video stream and monetize the content. Player loads
are an important measure for the amount of video content included across
website properties.


Newspapers and magazines continue to publish more online video than
any other media vertical

For the third consecutive quarter, newspaper and magazine websites featured a
larger number of videos than any other media vertical. In Q2, newspaper
websites generated 2.3 billion player loads, up 12 percent from Q1 and nearly 40
percent compared to Q2 of last year. Magazine websites generated 1.3 billion
player loads in Q2, a similar volume of player loads compared to Q1, but up 38
percent compared to Q2 of last year.


Broadcast networks and pure-play Web media properties increased video
publishing activity

In Q2, broadcast networks generated 685 million player loads, up four percent
compared to Q1. While slightly up in Q2, the player load number represents a
decline of almost 60 percent compared to the same quarter last year. The decline
seems to be further indication of a trend toward portal and aggregated video
player experiences around longer-form content, as compared to the distributed,
contextual and short-form nature of video content in the editorial and website
strategies represented by newspapers, magazines and other media industry
verticals.


Web media properties grew by three percent in Q2 with 788 million player loads,
which represents an increase of nearly 40 percent compared to the same period
last year.


© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                  Page 9
After four consecutive quarters of growth, radio broadcasters publish
fewer videos

In Q2, radio broadcast sites generated 90 million video player loads, which
represents the first decline after four consecutive quarters of growth. Despite the
decline in Q2, player loads on radio broadcaster websites are up 18 percent
compared to the same quarter in 2009.




Engagement, Discovery, Geography and
Distribution
The following section analyzes viewer behavior for a cross-section of media
companies (broadcasters, magazines, music labels, newspapers, online media
properties and radio).


Engagement
Overall, the number of unique viewers grew by an average of 2.81 percent per
month in Q2, up from 0.05 percent per month in the first quarter. Not only were
more unique viewers watching, but they were watching 11.2 percent more videos
per month. Audience engagement levels across all of the media verticals were
fairly consistent between Q1 and Q2, though some verticals saw a decrease in
both minutes watched and completion rates.


Between the first quarter and second quarter, average minutes watched held
steady across most categories at 2:00 minutes per stream, though growth was
achieved by television broadcasters by 3.1 percent to 3:01 minutes and
magazines by 2.1 percent to 1:21 minutes. Radio saw the biggest decline,
dropping from 1:32 minutes to 1:13 minutes in Q2.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                  Page 10
Completion rates, which refer to videos that were watched from start to finish,
were also steady across most of the media verticals, though broadcasters,
newspapers and radio saw a decline from Q1 to Q2. Newspapers saw the
sharpest decrease, dropping from 41 percent in Q1 to 33 percent in Q2.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                  Page 11
Discovery
Overall, 81.9 percent of video streams were discovered via direct traffic or
navigation within a publisher’s own site. From third party referral traffic, 64
percent comes from Google, followed by Yahoo (11.9 percent), Facebook (4.3
percent), Bing (2.6 percent), and Twitter (1.2 percent).

In terms of number of video streams referred per month, Facebook and Twitter
are growing much faster than traditional search engines as sources of video
views. At current rates, Facebook will surpass Yahoo! within the year to be
second only to Google in referral traffic to online video content for media
companies.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                     Page 12
Distribution
For the first time, this report will include analysis of off-site embeds across media
verticals, which varies widely by category. Broadcasters had the lowest
percentage of off-site embeds, which is not surprising given the premium, long-
form nature of their content. Newspapers, on the other hand, had the highest
percentage of off-site embeds, with 13.6 percent of all video content being
embedded on third party sites. Music videos represent the second highest
percentage, followed by radio broadcasters, magazine publishers and pure-play
Web media properties.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                    Page 13
Viewers watching videos via off-site embeds tended to watch less minutes per
stream than on-site viewers. Videos were watched for nearly double the amount
of time on broadcast sites (3:00 minutes) as they were from off-site embeds (1:59
minutes), but the numbers were less dramatic across the other verticals. Of note,
while pure-play Web media properties had the second lowest percentage of off-
site embeds, viewers watched off-site videos nearly 15 seconds longer than on-
site video content for this media vertical.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                Page 14
In most of the media verticals, Facebook and Twitter tended to refer more
engaged viewers than search engines. Broadcasters saw the highest
engagement levels from Facebook, while Twitter held the top spot in terms of
engagement for music videos. Google referred the most engaged viewers for the
newspaper vertical, while Bing was tops for the magazine and radio industry
verticals. Pure-play Web media was the only vertical where Yahoo! referred more
engaged viewers than Twitter, Google and Bing.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                  Page 15
Geography
Certain regions have outsized influence in specific categories. For instance,
viewers in the U.S. watched a larger share of videos from pure-play Web media
properties. 65 percent of the total views for radio content came from Asia-Pacific.
Music videos and radio content represent the lowest percentages for viewers in
the U.S. In Europe, music videos represent the largest share of total views,
followed closely by broadcast and magazine video content.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                  Page 16
U.S. viewers watched the greatest amount of content for the longest periods of
time across the broadcast, magazine, music video and radio verticals. Europeans
watched more video content on newspaper sites, but were slightly less engaged
than the U.S. audience. Europeans also watched the second highest amount of
broadcast video content, but were the least engaged, dropping off after 30
seconds on average. In the Asia-Pacific region, viewers tended to watch more
video from pure-play Web media properties than any other category, but were
most engaged when it came to radio content.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                   Page 17
Special Feature: Brand Marketers & On-
Site Video Initiatives
The following section focuses on a sample of brands and e-commerce sites
(referred to as “brands” below) powered by Brightcove. Media company averages
were not weighted by volume, but rather by type so as not to give any one type
(i.e. broadcasters) outsized influence.


Engagement
Viewers watched brand and e-commerce videos an average of 1:04 minutes per
stream in the second quarter of 2010, up slightly from 1:02 minutes in the first
quarter. Completion rates also held steady compared to the first quarter of 2010,
with around 38 percent watching a completed video.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                  Page 18
Discovery
Overall, the majority of video streams (92.1 percent) were discovered via direct
traffic or within a brand’s own site. From third-party traffic, 40.1 percent of video
streams came from Google, 16.8 percent from Yahoo, 13.1 percent from Bing,
7.9 percent from Facebook, 2.7 percent from AOL and 0.9 percent from Twitter.

In terms of growth in streams by discovery source, Facebook and Twitter are
growing much faster than the major search engines.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                     Page 19
Distribution
Only 2.6 percent of all brand views occurred through off-site embeds, which is
less than all media categories except for broadcasters. Viewers watching brand
and e-commerce videos off-site tend to watch longer than viewers watching on a
brand’s own site.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                Page 20
For brands, viewers coming from Facebook and Twitter lead to the longest
viewing times, while Yahoo! searches and display ads tied for shortest.
Compared to media companies, brands had shorter viewing-times, partly due to
the nature of the content and the fact that they tend to post videos that are
shorter in length.




Geography
In terms of geography, nearly 90 percent of brand views came from either the
U.S. or Europe. More than half of all brand / e-commerce views occurred in the
U.S. Brands also had fewer views coming from the Asia-Pacific region or the rest
of the world than media companies.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                      Page 21
U.S. viewers watched brand videos 20 to 54 seconds more than viewers from
other regions, demonstrating more time-spent with brand-related online video
content. Europeans watched news and entertainment video content even longer
than U.S. viewers, on average, but spent less time with brand videos than any
other region.



Brand Manager Survey Results

In Q2 of 2010, Brightcove and TubeMogul conducted a survey of more than 300
brand managers representing major consumer and B2B organizations, including
dozens of Fortune 500 companies, about their on-site video initiatives. The
sample included customers across North America and Europe.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                Page 22
Online Video Investment
Nearly 85 percent of brand managers surveyed indicated that they are currently
using online video on brand websites for marketing products and services.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                  Page 23
For those currently not using online video, 75 percent said they plan to add
online video to their websites within the next 12 months.


While brands devote a relatively small portion of their overall marketing budgets
to on-site video initiatives (50 percent devote less than 10 percent; 23 percent
devote less 25 percent; 22 percent devote between 25 and 50 percent), nearly
60 percent said they plan to spend more on their website video initiatives within
the next 12 months.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                  Page 24
Online Video Strategy
66 percent of brand managers said the primary purpose of their online video
initiatives are focused on branding and awareness, 21 percent are using video
for direct response and lead generation campaigns, and 12 percent to drive e-
commerce and sales initiatives.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                               Page 25
The majority of those using online video to drive e-commerce and sales initiatives
have found video to be highly effective at increasing customer engagement and
time spent on the brand website (53 percent) and increasing sales conversions
(35 percent). 12 percent of respondents noted that video has helped to reduce
product returns and customer support calls, while also reducing shopping cart
abandonment.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                 Page 26
Mobile Video Initiatives
The rapid growth of smartphone adoption throughout the world continues to drive
an enormous amount of mobile video consumption amongst consumers.
However, mobile video is still an emerging focus for many of the brand managers
that we surveyed. More than 60 percent said that mobile video is not currently
part of their marketing initiatives, though the same 60 percent also said they plan
to add mobile video to their marketing mix in the next 12 months.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                  Page 27
When it comes to mobile apps, 42 percent of brand managers indicated that they
currently have a mobile app to promote their brand, while 57 percent do not.
Those that do have mobile apps are primarily focused on building apps for Apple
iOS devices (100 percent), Android OS (27 percent) and other platforms
including Windows, Research in Motion BlackBerry and Symbian (47 percent).




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                Page 28
Of the respondents that do have mobile apps for their brands, only 21 percent
indicated their mobile apps include video content. However, a full 70 percent of
brand managers said they plan to add video to their mobile app strategy in the
next 12 months.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                 Page 29
Distribution & Social Media


80 percent of the brand managers surveyed indicated that they use a blended
distribution strategy that involves video content on their brand websites, as well
as on YouTube. 12 percent distribute video content exclusively on YouTube,
while three percent feature video content only on their brand websites.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                   Page 30
Nearly 90 percent of those surveyed distribute video content through social
media destinations like Facebook.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                                Page 31
Additionally, respondents were split down the middle when it comes to having
user-generated content as part of their online video initiatives.




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc                               Page 32
Contacts

Josh Hawkins
Director, Corporate Communications
Brightcove, Inc.
Phone: 617-395-0487
Email: jhawkins@brightcove.com


David Burch
Marketing Director
TubeMogul, Inc.
Phone: 510.653.0501
Email: david@tubemogul.com




© 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc   Page 33

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Macks space slideshow
Macks space slideshowMacks space slideshow
Macks space slideshowSueford
 
Our universe maddie!!
Our universe maddie!!Our universe maddie!!
Our universe maddie!!Sueford
 
Planting trees jay
Planting trees jayPlanting trees jay
Planting trees jaySueford
 
Space tom
Space tomSpace tom
Space tomSueford
 
Henry and jarred
Henry and jarredHenry and jarred
Henry and jarredSueford
 
Henry and jarred
Henry and jarredHenry and jarred
Henry and jarredSueford
 
Eva tree planting
Eva tree plantingEva tree planting
Eva tree plantingSueford
 
Mika tree planting
Mika tree plantingMika tree planting
Mika tree plantingSueford
 
Kat powerpoint
Kat powerpointKat powerpoint
Kat powerpointSueford
 
Saraiah and tallulah
Saraiah and tallulahSaraiah and tallulah
Saraiah and tallulahSueford
 
Kat powerpoint
Kat powerpointKat powerpoint
Kat powerpointSueford
 
Space dom
Space domSpace dom
Space domSueford
 
Kat powerpoint
Kat powerpointKat powerpoint
Kat powerpointSueford
 
Fin slid 2
Fin slid 2Fin slid 2
Fin slid 2Sueford
 
Tree planting ebony
Tree planting ebonyTree planting ebony
Tree planting ebonySueford
 
Henry and jarred
Henry and jarredHenry and jarred
Henry and jarredSueford
 
Aria room 4 tree planting
Aria room 4 tree plantingAria room 4 tree planting
Aria room 4 tree plantingSueford
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Triggered Email for Cross-selling
Triggered Email for Cross-sellingTriggered Email for Cross-selling
Triggered Email for Cross-selling
 
Macks space slideshow
Macks space slideshowMacks space slideshow
Macks space slideshow
 
Our universe maddie!!
Our universe maddie!!Our universe maddie!!
Our universe maddie!!
 
Planting trees jay
Planting trees jayPlanting trees jay
Planting trees jay
 
Space tom
Space tomSpace tom
Space tom
 
Henry and jarred
Henry and jarredHenry and jarred
Henry and jarred
 
Henry and jarred
Henry and jarredHenry and jarred
Henry and jarred
 
Fenix
FenixFenix
Fenix
 
Eva tree planting
Eva tree plantingEva tree planting
Eva tree planting
 
Mika tree planting
Mika tree plantingMika tree planting
Mika tree planting
 
Kyiah
KyiahKyiah
Kyiah
 
Kat powerpoint
Kat powerpointKat powerpoint
Kat powerpoint
 
Saraiah and tallulah
Saraiah and tallulahSaraiah and tallulah
Saraiah and tallulah
 
Kat powerpoint
Kat powerpointKat powerpoint
Kat powerpoint
 
Space dom
Space domSpace dom
Space dom
 
Kat powerpoint
Kat powerpointKat powerpoint
Kat powerpoint
 
Fin slid 2
Fin slid 2Fin slid 2
Fin slid 2
 
Tree planting ebony
Tree planting ebonyTree planting ebony
Tree planting ebony
 
Henry and jarred
Henry and jarredHenry and jarred
Henry and jarred
 
Aria room 4 tree planting
Aria room 4 tree plantingAria room 4 tree planting
Aria room 4 tree planting
 

More from Laura Morales

HM Research Panorama online del internauta deportista / fitness en México Jun...
HM Research Panorama online del internauta deportista / fitness en México Jun...HM Research Panorama online del internauta deportista / fitness en México Jun...
HM Research Panorama online del internauta deportista / fitness en México Jun...Laura Morales
 
IAB México. Estudio de Consumo de Medios entre Internautas Mexicanos 2011
IAB México. Estudio de Consumo de Medios entre Internautas Mexicanos 2011IAB México. Estudio de Consumo de Medios entre Internautas Mexicanos 2011
IAB México. Estudio de Consumo de Medios entre Internautas Mexicanos 2011Laura Morales
 
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama online Deportistas y Fitness en Méx...
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama online Deportistas y Fitness en Méx...Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama online Deportistas y Fitness en Méx...
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama online Deportistas y Fitness en Méx...Laura Morales
 
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper Panorama Online Jovenes y Teens Mexico julio ...
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper Panorama Online Jovenes y Teens Mexico julio ...Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper Panorama Online Jovenes y Teens Mexico julio ...
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper Panorama Online Jovenes y Teens Mexico julio ...Laura Morales
 
IAB MEXICO ESTUDIO CONSUMO DE MEDIOS SUPERINTERNAUTAS
IAB MEXICO ESTUDIO CONSUMO DE MEDIOS SUPERINTERNAUTASIAB MEXICO ESTUDIO CONSUMO DE MEDIOS SUPERINTERNAUTAS
IAB MEXICO ESTUDIO CONSUMO DE MEDIOS SUPERINTERNAUTASLaura Morales
 
Estudio de hábitos de uso de Internet enfocado a médicos y pacientes en Méxic...
Estudio de hábitos de uso de Internet enfocado a médicos y pacientes en Méxic...Estudio de hábitos de uso de Internet enfocado a médicos y pacientes en Méxic...
Estudio de hábitos de uso de Internet enfocado a médicos y pacientes en Méxic...Laura Morales
 
HM Research Whitepaper - Panorama Seguros en Social Media México y US Hispanic
HM Research Whitepaper - Panorama Seguros en Social Media México y US HispanicHM Research Whitepaper - Panorama Seguros en Social Media México y US Hispanic
HM Research Whitepaper - Panorama Seguros en Social Media México y US HispanicLaura Morales
 
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama Seguros en Social Media. México y U...
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama Seguros en Social Media. México y U...Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama Seguros en Social Media. México y U...
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama Seguros en Social Media. México y U...Laura Morales
 
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama Ventas por Catálogo en México
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama Ventas por Catálogo en MéxicoHarrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama Ventas por Catálogo en México
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama Ventas por Catálogo en MéxicoLaura Morales
 
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama de la Radio por Internet en México
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama de la Radio por Internet en MéxicoHarrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama de la Radio por Internet en México
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama de la Radio por Internet en MéxicoLaura Morales
 
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama online mercado de las mascotas en L...
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama online mercado de las mascotas en L...Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama online mercado de las mascotas en L...
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama online mercado de las mascotas en L...Laura Morales
 
Twitter en México. Marzo 2010. Estudio Realizado por Mente Digital
Twitter en México. Marzo 2010. Estudio Realizado por Mente DigitalTwitter en México. Marzo 2010. Estudio Realizado por Mente Digital
Twitter en México. Marzo 2010. Estudio Realizado por Mente DigitalLaura Morales
 
Panorama Jovenes y Teens en México. Febrero 2011
Panorama Jovenes y Teens en México. Febrero 2011Panorama Jovenes y Teens en México. Febrero 2011
Panorama Jovenes y Teens en México. Febrero 2011Laura Morales
 
Twittermexico2011 1-110307120154-phpapp01
Twittermexico2011 1-110307120154-phpapp01Twittermexico2011 1-110307120154-phpapp01
Twittermexico2011 1-110307120154-phpapp01Laura Morales
 
Harrenmedia White Paper productos de consumo en las categorías Hogar y Trabaj...
Harrenmedia White Paper productos de consumo en las categorías Hogar y Trabaj...Harrenmedia White Paper productos de consumo en las categorías Hogar y Trabaj...
Harrenmedia White Paper productos de consumo en las categorías Hogar y Trabaj...Laura Morales
 
Harrenmedia Research White Paper Panorama Gobierno Online febrero, 2011
Harrenmedia Research White Paper Panorama Gobierno Online  febrero, 2011Harrenmedia Research White Paper Panorama Gobierno Online  febrero, 2011
Harrenmedia Research White Paper Panorama Gobierno Online febrero, 2011Laura Morales
 
Harrenmedia Research White Paper Panorama Universidades en México
Harrenmedia Research White Paper Panorama Universidades en MéxicoHarrenmedia Research White Paper Panorama Universidades en México
Harrenmedia Research White Paper Panorama Universidades en MéxicoLaura Morales
 
HM-Research-Whitepaper-Overview of Latin America and US Hispanic Audience for...
HM-Research-Whitepaper-Overview of Latin America and US Hispanic Audience for...HM-Research-Whitepaper-Overview of Latin America and US Hispanic Audience for...
HM-Research-Whitepaper-Overview of Latin America and US Hispanic Audience for...Laura Morales
 

More from Laura Morales (20)

HarrenVideo
HarrenVideoHarrenVideo
HarrenVideo
 
HarrenMobile
HarrenMobileHarrenMobile
HarrenMobile
 
HM Research Panorama online del internauta deportista / fitness en México Jun...
HM Research Panorama online del internauta deportista / fitness en México Jun...HM Research Panorama online del internauta deportista / fitness en México Jun...
HM Research Panorama online del internauta deportista / fitness en México Jun...
 
IAB México. Estudio de Consumo de Medios entre Internautas Mexicanos 2011
IAB México. Estudio de Consumo de Medios entre Internautas Mexicanos 2011IAB México. Estudio de Consumo de Medios entre Internautas Mexicanos 2011
IAB México. Estudio de Consumo de Medios entre Internautas Mexicanos 2011
 
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama online Deportistas y Fitness en Méx...
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama online Deportistas y Fitness en Méx...Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama online Deportistas y Fitness en Méx...
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama online Deportistas y Fitness en Méx...
 
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper Panorama Online Jovenes y Teens Mexico julio ...
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper Panorama Online Jovenes y Teens Mexico julio ...Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper Panorama Online Jovenes y Teens Mexico julio ...
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper Panorama Online Jovenes y Teens Mexico julio ...
 
IAB MEXICO ESTUDIO CONSUMO DE MEDIOS SUPERINTERNAUTAS
IAB MEXICO ESTUDIO CONSUMO DE MEDIOS SUPERINTERNAUTASIAB MEXICO ESTUDIO CONSUMO DE MEDIOS SUPERINTERNAUTAS
IAB MEXICO ESTUDIO CONSUMO DE MEDIOS SUPERINTERNAUTAS
 
Estudio de hábitos de uso de Internet enfocado a médicos y pacientes en Méxic...
Estudio de hábitos de uso de Internet enfocado a médicos y pacientes en Méxic...Estudio de hábitos de uso de Internet enfocado a médicos y pacientes en Méxic...
Estudio de hábitos de uso de Internet enfocado a médicos y pacientes en Méxic...
 
HM Research Whitepaper - Panorama Seguros en Social Media México y US Hispanic
HM Research Whitepaper - Panorama Seguros en Social Media México y US HispanicHM Research Whitepaper - Panorama Seguros en Social Media México y US Hispanic
HM Research Whitepaper - Panorama Seguros en Social Media México y US Hispanic
 
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama Seguros en Social Media. México y U...
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama Seguros en Social Media. México y U...Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama Seguros en Social Media. México y U...
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama Seguros en Social Media. México y U...
 
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama Ventas por Catálogo en México
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama Ventas por Catálogo en MéxicoHarrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama Ventas por Catálogo en México
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama Ventas por Catálogo en México
 
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama de la Radio por Internet en México
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama de la Radio por Internet en MéxicoHarrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama de la Radio por Internet en México
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama de la Radio por Internet en México
 
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama online mercado de las mascotas en L...
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama online mercado de las mascotas en L...Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama online mercado de las mascotas en L...
Harrenmedia Research Whitepaper: Panorama online mercado de las mascotas en L...
 
Twitter en México. Marzo 2010. Estudio Realizado por Mente Digital
Twitter en México. Marzo 2010. Estudio Realizado por Mente DigitalTwitter en México. Marzo 2010. Estudio Realizado por Mente Digital
Twitter en México. Marzo 2010. Estudio Realizado por Mente Digital
 
Panorama Jovenes y Teens en México. Febrero 2011
Panorama Jovenes y Teens en México. Febrero 2011Panorama Jovenes y Teens en México. Febrero 2011
Panorama Jovenes y Teens en México. Febrero 2011
 
Twittermexico2011 1-110307120154-phpapp01
Twittermexico2011 1-110307120154-phpapp01Twittermexico2011 1-110307120154-phpapp01
Twittermexico2011 1-110307120154-phpapp01
 
Harrenmedia White Paper productos de consumo en las categorías Hogar y Trabaj...
Harrenmedia White Paper productos de consumo en las categorías Hogar y Trabaj...Harrenmedia White Paper productos de consumo en las categorías Hogar y Trabaj...
Harrenmedia White Paper productos de consumo en las categorías Hogar y Trabaj...
 
Harrenmedia Research White Paper Panorama Gobierno Online febrero, 2011
Harrenmedia Research White Paper Panorama Gobierno Online  febrero, 2011Harrenmedia Research White Paper Panorama Gobierno Online  febrero, 2011
Harrenmedia Research White Paper Panorama Gobierno Online febrero, 2011
 
Harrenmedia Research White Paper Panorama Universidades en México
Harrenmedia Research White Paper Panorama Universidades en MéxicoHarrenmedia Research White Paper Panorama Universidades en México
Harrenmedia Research White Paper Panorama Universidades en México
 
HM-Research-Whitepaper-Overview of Latin America and US Hispanic Audience for...
HM-Research-Whitepaper-Overview of Latin America and US Hispanic Audience for...HM-Research-Whitepaper-Overview of Latin America and US Hispanic Audience for...
HM-Research-Whitepaper-Overview of Latin America and US Hispanic Audience for...
 

Recently uploaded

COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online CollaborationCOMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaborationbruanjhuli
 
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024SkyPlanner
 
The Data Metaverse: Unpacking the Roles, Use Cases, and Tech Trends in Data a...
The Data Metaverse: Unpacking the Roles, Use Cases, and Tech Trends in Data a...The Data Metaverse: Unpacking the Roles, Use Cases, and Tech Trends in Data a...
The Data Metaverse: Unpacking the Roles, Use Cases, and Tech Trends in Data a...Aggregage
 
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
20230202 - Introduction to tis-pyJamie (Taka) Wang
 
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.YounusS2
 
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve DecarbonizationUsing IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve DecarbonizationIES VE
 
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and IstioComparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and IstioChristian Posta
 
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptxCybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptxGDSC PJATK
 
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )Brian Pichman
 
Designing A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URLDesigning A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URLRuncy Oommen
 
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdf
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdf
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfJamie (Taka) Wang
 
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...DianaGray10
 
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond OntologiesLinked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond OntologiesDavid Newbury
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8DianaGray10
 
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding TeamAdam Moalla
 
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystem
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystemBird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystem
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystemAsko Soukka
 
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBXVoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBXTarek Kalaji
 
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration Workflows
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration WorkflowsIgniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration Workflows
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration WorkflowsSafe Software
 

Recently uploaded (20)

COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online CollaborationCOMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
 
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024
 
The Data Metaverse: Unpacking the Roles, Use Cases, and Tech Trends in Data a...
The Data Metaverse: Unpacking the Roles, Use Cases, and Tech Trends in Data a...The Data Metaverse: Unpacking the Roles, Use Cases, and Tech Trends in Data a...
The Data Metaverse: Unpacking the Roles, Use Cases, and Tech Trends in Data a...
 
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
 
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.
 
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve DecarbonizationUsing IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
 
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and IstioComparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
 
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptxCybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
 
20150722 - AGV
20150722 - AGV20150722 - AGV
20150722 - AGV
 
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
 
Designing A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URLDesigning A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URL
 
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdf
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdf
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdf
 
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...
 
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond OntologiesLinked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
 
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
 
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystem
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystemBird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystem
Bird eye's view on Camunda open source ecosystem
 
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBXVoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
 
201610817 - edge part1
201610817 - edge part1201610817 - edge part1
201610817 - edge part1
 
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration Workflows
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration WorkflowsIgniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration Workflows
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration Workflows
 

Brightcove whitepaper-online-video-and-media-industry-q2-2010

  • 2. Background ........................................................................................................... 3 Methodology ......................................................................................................... 3 Key Findings ......................................................................................................... 4 Online Video Streams .................................................................................... 4 Engagement .................................................................................................. 5 Discovery ....................................................................................................... 5 Distribution & Engagement ............................................................................ 6 Special Feature: Brand Marketers & On-Site Video Initiatives ...................... 6 Platform Usage ..................................................................................................... 7 Video Stream Trend Data.................................................................................. 7 Player Loads – Q2 2010.................................................................................... 9 Engagement, Discovery, Geography and Distribution ........................................ 11 Discovery......................................................................................................... 12 Distribution....................................................................................................... 13 Geography....................................................................................................... 16 Special Feature: Brand Marketers & On-Site Video Initiatives ........................... 18 Discovery......................................................................................................... 20 Distribution....................................................................................................... 20 Geography....................................................................................................... 22 Brand Manager Survey Results ...................................................................... 24 Online Video Investment.............................................................................. 23 Online Video Strategy .................................................................................. 25 Mobile Video Initiatives ................................................................................ 27 Distribution & Social Media .......................................................................... 31 © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 2
  • 3. Background Brightcove is an on-demand software platform that media companies and marketers use to publish and distribute video on the Web, mobile devices, and Internet-connected TVs. Brightcove has more than 1,800 customers in 48 countries, which operate video across nearly 10,000 websites, including many of the most popular news and entertainment destinations on the Web. TubeMogul is an online video analytics and advertising platform that processes billions of video streams every month from the Internet’s top publishers. More than 200,000 users rely on TubeMogul’s distribution and analytics, and hundreds of marketing agencies and brand advertisers are among the company’s clients. Brightcove and TubeMogul have teamed up to develop a new online video index and quarterly research report, which will help identify key industry trends and answer questions about the state of the industry. Methodology The data used for the analysis included in this report was taken from a cross- section sample of Brightcove customers representing media industry verticals. While the sample aggregates a sizable data set, it is not intended to be statistically representative of the online video industry as a whole, or of Brightcove’s entire customer base. Instead, the data analysis is intended to provide a directional snapshot of media trends and inform additional research initiatives focused on the online video industry. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 3
  • 4. This research report draws on a number of data sources: • Platform data from a sample of Brightcove media customers; and • Consumer engagement reports based on TubeMogul’s online video analytics from this aggregate data set. In this Q2 research report, Brightcove and TubeMogul have included a special feature focused on brand marketers and on-site video initiatives. This analysis uses: • Platform data from a sample of Brightcove brand marketing and e-commerce customers; and • An anonymous survey of more than 300 senior-level brand managers from leading business-to-business and consumer brands, including dozens of Fortune 500 companies. Key Findings Online Video Streams Newspaper online video growth surges • In Q2, broadcast networks and pure-play Web media properties remained in the top two positions among media industry verticals for overall video stream growth. • Online video streams from newspaper websites surged in Q2 by more than 65 percent. This can be attributed to the sustained coverage of the BP oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, which started on April 20th and ran through May and June. • Video stream growth slowed among magazine website properties, as well as music label and artist websites in Q2. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 4
  • 5. Engagement More people watching more videos • The volume of unique viewers accessing online video grew across all media verticals in Q2 by an average of 2.8 percent per month compared to .05 percent month-over-month growth in Q1. • Viewers watched 11.8 percent more videos per month in Q2 than last quarter. • In Q2, across media verticals, the average viewing time per video stream was 2:00 minutes. • Broadcast networks and magazine websites saw an increase in the average length of viewing time per video in Q2 by 3.1 percent and 2.1 percent respectively. • The online video content of media companies has an average completion rate of 38 percent per video view. Magazine website and pure-play Web media properties had the highest overall completion rates per video view. Discovery Referral traffic for online video from Facebook and Twitter growing faster than search engines • Google continues to generate the highest volume of traffic to online video content followed by Yahoo!, Facebook, Bing and Twitter. • Referral traffic from Facebook and Twitter is growing faster than traditional search engines as a source of video views. At current rates, Facebook will surpass Yahoo! within the year to be second only to Google in referral traffic to online video content for media companies. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 5
  • 6. Distribution & Engagement On-site viewing generates deeper engagement than syndicated video players • Broadcast networks have the smallest percentage of video content viewed through embedded players on third-party websites. Newspapers, on the other hand, have the highest percentage of off-site viewing. • For the majority of media verticals, viewers watching videos via off-site player embeds tend to watch fewer minutes per stream than on-site viewers. • Facebook and Twitter generate the most engaged viewing audiences for online video content from media companies, followed by Bing, Yahoo!, and Google. Special Feature: Brand Marketers & On-Site Video Initiatives Platform Data • Viewers in Q2 watched brand marketing and e-commerce videos an average of 1:04 minutes per stream, compared to 2:00 minutes per stream of online video content from media companies. • 2.6 percent of views for brand marketing and e-commerce video content was viewed off-site through embedded video players on third party sites as compared to 6.5 percent of off-site video for media companies • The average length of brand and e-commerce video views via embedded players on third-party sites in Q2 was 1:42 minutes compared to 1:02 minutes on the brand websites. By contrast, media companies generated an average of 1:00 minute per view for video content on third-party sites compared to an average of 2:00 minutes per view on the official news and entertainment websites. • Referral traffic from Facebook and Twitter lead to the longest viewing times, while the video views that originate from Yahoo! search and display ads tied for shortest. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 6
  • 7. Survey Results • For the vast majority of brand managers (85 percent), website video is currently part of their marketing mix. More than 60 percent say they plan to invest more in on-site video initiatives in the next 12 months. • Survey respondents indicated that the primary purpose for their on-site video initiatives is branding and awareness (66 percent) followed by direct response / lead generation (21 percent) and e-commerce / sales (12 percent). • Brand managers have embraced blended distribution strategies with 80 percent including video on their own brand sites, as well as YouTube and 90 percent distributing video through Facebook. • While only 21 percent of brand managers indicated that their current mobile app strategy included video, 70 said they plan to add video to their mobile apps over the next 12 months. Platform Usage The following analysis is based on aggregated Brightcove platform data from a sample of more than 200 media companies representing media industry verticals, including broadcast networks, magazine publishers, music labels, newspaper publishers, pure-play Web media properties, and radio broadcasters. The data set spans 2008 to 2009, as well as the first half of 2010. Video Stream Trend Data Broadcast remains top media vertical for online video streams In Q2, broadcast networks maintained their top position among media verticals for the ninth consecutive quarter with 406 million online video streams. Video stream totals for broadcasters in Q2 represent a 25 percent increase compared to the same quarter last year. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 7
  • 8. Pure-play Web media properties in second place, newspapers gaining Pure-play Web media properties continue to show strong growth with nearly 300 million video streams in Q2. While relatively flat over the past five quarters, online video streams surged in the newspaper vertical more than 65 percent to almost 225 million between Q1 and Q2 of this year as a result of the sustained coverage of the BP oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, which started on April 20th and ran through May and June. Video stream growth slows for magazine publishers and music labels After eight consecutive quarters of growth, online video streams for magazine publishers declined by seven percent between Q1 to Q2 of this year. Despite the decline, Q2’s 174 million video streams represent a 45 percent increase compared to the same period last year. In the music sector, Q2 brought a sharper decline of almost 40 percent in video stream volume from artist and label sites with 134 million streams. This significant reduction in overall online video stream volume on music label and artist sites could be attributable to the growing popularity of the VEVO.com music video portal. Music label and artist stream totals are still up by 13 percent compared to the same quarter last year. Radio broadcasters continue steady growth in online video streams Q2 of 2010 marked the tenth consecutive quarter of growth for the radio broadcast sector with 9 million video streams. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 8
  • 9. Player Loads – Q2 2010 A player load represents the graphics, data and other components rendered on a webpage in order to view a video stream and monetize the content. Player loads are an important measure for the amount of video content included across website properties. Newspapers and magazines continue to publish more online video than any other media vertical For the third consecutive quarter, newspaper and magazine websites featured a larger number of videos than any other media vertical. In Q2, newspaper websites generated 2.3 billion player loads, up 12 percent from Q1 and nearly 40 percent compared to Q2 of last year. Magazine websites generated 1.3 billion player loads in Q2, a similar volume of player loads compared to Q1, but up 38 percent compared to Q2 of last year. Broadcast networks and pure-play Web media properties increased video publishing activity In Q2, broadcast networks generated 685 million player loads, up four percent compared to Q1. While slightly up in Q2, the player load number represents a decline of almost 60 percent compared to the same quarter last year. The decline seems to be further indication of a trend toward portal and aggregated video player experiences around longer-form content, as compared to the distributed, contextual and short-form nature of video content in the editorial and website strategies represented by newspapers, magazines and other media industry verticals. Web media properties grew by three percent in Q2 with 788 million player loads, which represents an increase of nearly 40 percent compared to the same period last year. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 9
  • 10. After four consecutive quarters of growth, radio broadcasters publish fewer videos In Q2, radio broadcast sites generated 90 million video player loads, which represents the first decline after four consecutive quarters of growth. Despite the decline in Q2, player loads on radio broadcaster websites are up 18 percent compared to the same quarter in 2009. Engagement, Discovery, Geography and Distribution The following section analyzes viewer behavior for a cross-section of media companies (broadcasters, magazines, music labels, newspapers, online media properties and radio). Engagement Overall, the number of unique viewers grew by an average of 2.81 percent per month in Q2, up from 0.05 percent per month in the first quarter. Not only were more unique viewers watching, but they were watching 11.2 percent more videos per month. Audience engagement levels across all of the media verticals were fairly consistent between Q1 and Q2, though some verticals saw a decrease in both minutes watched and completion rates. Between the first quarter and second quarter, average minutes watched held steady across most categories at 2:00 minutes per stream, though growth was achieved by television broadcasters by 3.1 percent to 3:01 minutes and magazines by 2.1 percent to 1:21 minutes. Radio saw the biggest decline, dropping from 1:32 minutes to 1:13 minutes in Q2. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 10
  • 11. Completion rates, which refer to videos that were watched from start to finish, were also steady across most of the media verticals, though broadcasters, newspapers and radio saw a decline from Q1 to Q2. Newspapers saw the sharpest decrease, dropping from 41 percent in Q1 to 33 percent in Q2. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 11
  • 12. Discovery Overall, 81.9 percent of video streams were discovered via direct traffic or navigation within a publisher’s own site. From third party referral traffic, 64 percent comes from Google, followed by Yahoo (11.9 percent), Facebook (4.3 percent), Bing (2.6 percent), and Twitter (1.2 percent). In terms of number of video streams referred per month, Facebook and Twitter are growing much faster than traditional search engines as sources of video views. At current rates, Facebook will surpass Yahoo! within the year to be second only to Google in referral traffic to online video content for media companies. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 12
  • 13. Distribution For the first time, this report will include analysis of off-site embeds across media verticals, which varies widely by category. Broadcasters had the lowest percentage of off-site embeds, which is not surprising given the premium, long- form nature of their content. Newspapers, on the other hand, had the highest percentage of off-site embeds, with 13.6 percent of all video content being embedded on third party sites. Music videos represent the second highest percentage, followed by radio broadcasters, magazine publishers and pure-play Web media properties. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 13
  • 14. Viewers watching videos via off-site embeds tended to watch less minutes per stream than on-site viewers. Videos were watched for nearly double the amount of time on broadcast sites (3:00 minutes) as they were from off-site embeds (1:59 minutes), but the numbers were less dramatic across the other verticals. Of note, while pure-play Web media properties had the second lowest percentage of off- site embeds, viewers watched off-site videos nearly 15 seconds longer than on- site video content for this media vertical. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 14
  • 15. In most of the media verticals, Facebook and Twitter tended to refer more engaged viewers than search engines. Broadcasters saw the highest engagement levels from Facebook, while Twitter held the top spot in terms of engagement for music videos. Google referred the most engaged viewers for the newspaper vertical, while Bing was tops for the magazine and radio industry verticals. Pure-play Web media was the only vertical where Yahoo! referred more engaged viewers than Twitter, Google and Bing. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 15
  • 16. Geography Certain regions have outsized influence in specific categories. For instance, viewers in the U.S. watched a larger share of videos from pure-play Web media properties. 65 percent of the total views for radio content came from Asia-Pacific. Music videos and radio content represent the lowest percentages for viewers in the U.S. In Europe, music videos represent the largest share of total views, followed closely by broadcast and magazine video content. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 16
  • 17. U.S. viewers watched the greatest amount of content for the longest periods of time across the broadcast, magazine, music video and radio verticals. Europeans watched more video content on newspaper sites, but were slightly less engaged than the U.S. audience. Europeans also watched the second highest amount of broadcast video content, but were the least engaged, dropping off after 30 seconds on average. In the Asia-Pacific region, viewers tended to watch more video from pure-play Web media properties than any other category, but were most engaged when it came to radio content. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 17
  • 18. Special Feature: Brand Marketers & On- Site Video Initiatives The following section focuses on a sample of brands and e-commerce sites (referred to as “brands” below) powered by Brightcove. Media company averages were not weighted by volume, but rather by type so as not to give any one type (i.e. broadcasters) outsized influence. Engagement Viewers watched brand and e-commerce videos an average of 1:04 minutes per stream in the second quarter of 2010, up slightly from 1:02 minutes in the first quarter. Completion rates also held steady compared to the first quarter of 2010, with around 38 percent watching a completed video. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 18
  • 19. Discovery Overall, the majority of video streams (92.1 percent) were discovered via direct traffic or within a brand’s own site. From third-party traffic, 40.1 percent of video streams came from Google, 16.8 percent from Yahoo, 13.1 percent from Bing, 7.9 percent from Facebook, 2.7 percent from AOL and 0.9 percent from Twitter. In terms of growth in streams by discovery source, Facebook and Twitter are growing much faster than the major search engines. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 19
  • 20. Distribution Only 2.6 percent of all brand views occurred through off-site embeds, which is less than all media categories except for broadcasters. Viewers watching brand and e-commerce videos off-site tend to watch longer than viewers watching on a brand’s own site. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 20
  • 21. For brands, viewers coming from Facebook and Twitter lead to the longest viewing times, while Yahoo! searches and display ads tied for shortest. Compared to media companies, brands had shorter viewing-times, partly due to the nature of the content and the fact that they tend to post videos that are shorter in length. Geography In terms of geography, nearly 90 percent of brand views came from either the U.S. or Europe. More than half of all brand / e-commerce views occurred in the U.S. Brands also had fewer views coming from the Asia-Pacific region or the rest of the world than media companies. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 21
  • 22. U.S. viewers watched brand videos 20 to 54 seconds more than viewers from other regions, demonstrating more time-spent with brand-related online video content. Europeans watched news and entertainment video content even longer than U.S. viewers, on average, but spent less time with brand videos than any other region. Brand Manager Survey Results In Q2 of 2010, Brightcove and TubeMogul conducted a survey of more than 300 brand managers representing major consumer and B2B organizations, including dozens of Fortune 500 companies, about their on-site video initiatives. The sample included customers across North America and Europe. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 22
  • 23. Online Video Investment Nearly 85 percent of brand managers surveyed indicated that they are currently using online video on brand websites for marketing products and services. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 23
  • 24. For those currently not using online video, 75 percent said they plan to add online video to their websites within the next 12 months. While brands devote a relatively small portion of their overall marketing budgets to on-site video initiatives (50 percent devote less than 10 percent; 23 percent devote less 25 percent; 22 percent devote between 25 and 50 percent), nearly 60 percent said they plan to spend more on their website video initiatives within the next 12 months. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 24
  • 25. Online Video Strategy 66 percent of brand managers said the primary purpose of their online video initiatives are focused on branding and awareness, 21 percent are using video for direct response and lead generation campaigns, and 12 percent to drive e- commerce and sales initiatives. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 25
  • 26. The majority of those using online video to drive e-commerce and sales initiatives have found video to be highly effective at increasing customer engagement and time spent on the brand website (53 percent) and increasing sales conversions (35 percent). 12 percent of respondents noted that video has helped to reduce product returns and customer support calls, while also reducing shopping cart abandonment. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 26
  • 27. Mobile Video Initiatives The rapid growth of smartphone adoption throughout the world continues to drive an enormous amount of mobile video consumption amongst consumers. However, mobile video is still an emerging focus for many of the brand managers that we surveyed. More than 60 percent said that mobile video is not currently part of their marketing initiatives, though the same 60 percent also said they plan to add mobile video to their marketing mix in the next 12 months. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 27
  • 28. When it comes to mobile apps, 42 percent of brand managers indicated that they currently have a mobile app to promote their brand, while 57 percent do not. Those that do have mobile apps are primarily focused on building apps for Apple iOS devices (100 percent), Android OS (27 percent) and other platforms including Windows, Research in Motion BlackBerry and Symbian (47 percent). © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 28
  • 29. Of the respondents that do have mobile apps for their brands, only 21 percent indicated their mobile apps include video content. However, a full 70 percent of brand managers said they plan to add video to their mobile app strategy in the next 12 months. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 29
  • 30. Distribution & Social Media 80 percent of the brand managers surveyed indicated that they use a blended distribution strategy that involves video content on their brand websites, as well as on YouTube. 12 percent distribute video content exclusively on YouTube, while three percent feature video content only on their brand websites. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 30
  • 31. Nearly 90 percent of those surveyed distribute video content through social media destinations like Facebook. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 31
  • 32. Additionally, respondents were split down the middle when it comes to having user-generated content as part of their online video initiatives. © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 32
  • 33. Contacts Josh Hawkins Director, Corporate Communications Brightcove, Inc. Phone: 617-395-0487 Email: jhawkins@brightcove.com David Burch Marketing Director TubeMogul, Inc. Phone: 510.653.0501 Email: david@tubemogul.com © 2010 Brightcove, Inc. and TubeMogul, Inc Page 33