8. Recalcitrant Source: S. Joseph UNSW
Source: E Krull CSIRO
9. Terrestrial Carbon Cycle
Atmosphere
Photosynthesis Respiration
Fire
CO2 -
Mineral-
isation
Assimilation Labile carbon:
Substrate C Microbial
Microbial
Particulate Death
litter & roots biomass, C
Biomass
carbon Soluble C Charcoal
Charcoal
Humified
Organic carbon
carbon
Humification
After J. Skjemstad, CRC Greenhouse Accounting
10. Cumulative per cent of biochar-C decomposed
BP Singh et al. 2012 (EST)
Low-temperature (400 oC) biochars High-temperature (550 oC) biochars
10.0 10.0
8.0 Poultry litter Papermill sludge 8.0
Cumulative % of added biochar-C mineralized
Cumulative % of added biochar-C mineralized
6.0 6.0
4.0 4.0
Cow manure
3.0 3.0
Eucalyptus leaf
2.5 2.5
Cow manure
2.0 2.0
1.5 1.5
1.0 Poultry litter 1.0
Eucalyptus wood
Eucalyptus leaf
0.5 0.5
Eucalyptus wood
0.0 0.0
0 20 40 60 260 520 780 1040 1300 1560 1820 0 20 40 60 260 520 780 1040 1300 1560 1820
Duration of incubation (days)
0.5% to 8.9% of biochar C mineralized
over 5 years.
11. Biochar stability -
a function of feedstock and pyrolysis conditions
BP Singh et al. 2012 (EST)
Most stable
(~2000 years)
Pyrolysis temperature
550°C wood (A or NA)
Carbon content
Fused aromatic rings
550°C leaf (A)
550°C poultry (A)
550°C cow (A)
400°C wood (A or NA)
400°C leaf (A)
550°C paper sludge (A)??
400°C manures (poultry, cow) (NA)
Least stable Mineral nutrient content
(~100 years) Synthesis: “after E. Krull”
12. Biochar can reduce soil N2O emissions
35000 Alfisol Control
12000 Vertisol
30000
Poultry manure_400 10000
Cumulative N2O emissions µg /m2
25000
8000
20000 Wood_550
6000
15000 Poultry manure_550
4000
10000 Wood_400
2000
5000
14-73% reduction in N2O 23-52% reduction in N2O
0 0
4-Aug 9-Aug 14-Aug 19-Aug 24-Aug 29-Aug 4-Aug 9-Aug 14-Aug 19-Aug 24-Aug 29-Aug
The day of gas sampling The day of gas sampling
BP Singh et al. 2010 (JEQ)
14. N2O emissions Calculated
Poultry
N2O-N Emission
(kg.ha-1) Factor
0.010
Biochar+
Urea 1.5 1.3
0.008
Urea 1.2 1.0
N2O(kg.ha .hr )
1
0.006 Poultry litter 4.9 8.4
1
0.004 standard error = 1.0
Biochar+Urea least significant difference (5%
critical value) = 2.5
Urea
0.002
0.000
100
40
Rain (mm)
TempC
30
50 20
10
0 0
09 Dec 23 Dec 06 Jan 20 Jan 03 Feb
Van Zwieten et al (2013) Science of the Total Environment.
15. Biochar impact on soil porosity
National Biochar Initiative: Peter Quin et al UNE/NSW DPI
16. Cumulative priming of soil C by biochar
Singh & Cowie (Unpublished)
400 C biochars 550 C biochars
(c) (d)
40 40
Cumulative primed soil CO2-C (mg g-1 soil C)
Cumulative primed soil CO2-C (mg g-1 soil C)
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
Wood400 Wood550
Leaf400A Leaf550A
PL400 PL550A
-10 CM400 CM550A -10
YWood450_2%LOM YWood450_2%LOM
YWood450_4%LOM YWood550_4%LOM
0 40 80 120 260 520 780 1040 1300 1560 1820 0 40 80 120 260 520 780 1040 1300 1560 1820
Duration of incubation (days)
Biochar initially enhanced mineralisation of native soil C
Native soil C was stabilised as biochar aged
17. GHG mitigation benefits of biochar
Delayed decomposition of biomass
Reduced nitrous oxide emissions from soil
Increased soil organic matter
Avoided fossil fuel emissions due to use of syngas as
renewable energy
Increased plant growth, plant health
Avoided emissions from N fertiliser manufacture
Reduced fuel use in cultivation, irrigation
Avoided methane and nitrous oxide emissions due to
avoided decay of residues
18. Biochar system Reference system
Fossil
Biomass Biomass
energy/carbon
residue residue source
Extraction
Transport
Transport Transport
Pyrolysis to
biochar and
syngas Conversion to
Composting
energy carrier
Distribution of Distribution of
Distribution of Distribution of compost energy carrier
biochar energy carrier
Fertiliser
manufacture
Distribution of
fertiliser
Soil Energy service Soil Energy service
amendment (heat, electricity) amendment (heat, electricity)
24. Sustainability issues for
biochar – direct (1)
Biomass procurement
Residues:
Soil erosion
Soil compaction
Nutrient depletion
Soil carbon loss (GHG, productivity
impact)
Purpose grown:
Water use
Biomass and/or soil carbon decline
GHG balance - N2O emissions
25.
26.
27. Sustainability issues for biochar – direct
(2)
Biochar production
GHG emissions
particulate emissions
Biochar application
dust
contamination (if feedstock contaminated)
Whole system:
net mitigation benefit (incl transport, plant
construction)
Compared with reference use
28. Sustainability issues for biochar –
indirect
Indirect land use change – Deforestation
GHG emissions: loss of biomass carbon, soil carbon
Biodiversity
Air pollution
Water quality
Social – community displacement, food security
Economic – competing uses of biomass
29. How can we
encourage
sustainability?
Sustainability framework
approach:
Institutional systems:
Regulation
Incentives
Standards
Guidelines
Certification
Monitoring, assessment
and reporting
Criteria and Indicators
Adaptive management
30. What do we know about biochar?
Biochar can increase plant yield
But not all plants / all soils
Biochar is resistant to decomposition
But some biochars are more resistant than others
Biochar can reduce nitrous oxide emissions
But not from nitrification
Biochar can deliver net greenhouse gas mitigation
Other options may give greater mitigation; each situation must be
assessed separately
Biochar could contaminate soil
But only if made from contaminated feedstock
Some unintended consequences
Biochar can reduce efficacy of herbicides
31. Biochar can…
Contribute significantly to climate change mitigation
Enhance agricultural productivity
Restore degraded soils
BUT ONLY IF
produced in a facility that controls emissions and harnesses
heat for efficient beneficial use
applied with care, to responsive soil type / crop
made from sustainably harvested and renewable biomass
resources
32. annette.cowie@une.edu.au
More information:
International Biochar Initiative
http://www.biochar-international.org/