SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
                                                                                               6 February 2013

      GOOGLE INC v AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION

                                                 [2013] HCA 1

Today the High Court unanimously allowed an appeal from a decision of the Full Court of the
Federal Court of Australia, in which it was found that Google Inc ("Google") had engaged in
misleading or deceptive conduct contrary to s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ("the Act")
by displaying certain internet search results.

The Google search engine displayed two types of search results in response to a user's search
request: "organic search results" and "sponsored links". Organic search results were links to web
pages that were ranked in order of relevance to the search terms entered by the user. A sponsored
link was a form of advertisement. Each sponsored link was created by, or at the direction of, an
advertiser, who paid Google to display advertising text which directed users to a web site of the
advertiser's choosing.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission ("the ACCC") claimed that particular
sponsored links displayed by the Google search engine between 2005 and 2008 had conveyed
misleading and deceptive representations. By publishing or displaying those search results, Google
was said to have contravened s 52 of the Act, which provided that a corporation shall not, in trade
or commerce, engage in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or is likely to mislead or deceive.

At first instance, the primary judge found that although the impugned representations were
misleading and deceptive, those representations had not been made by Google. Ordinary and
reasonable members of the relevant class of consumers who might be affected by the alleged
conduct would have understood that sponsored links were advertisements and would not have
understood Google to have endorsed or to have been responsible in any meaningful way for the
content of those advertisements.

The ACCC successfully appealed to the Full Court of the Federal Court, which unanimously found
that Google had itself engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct by publishing and displaying the
sponsored links. By special leave, Google appealed to the High Court.

The High Court unanimously allowed the appeal. Google did not create the sponsored links that it
published or displayed. Ordinary and reasonable users of the Google search engine would have
understood that the representations conveyed by the sponsored links were those of the advertisers,
and would not have concluded that Google adopted or endorsed the representations. Accordingly,
Google did not engage in conduct that was misleading or deceptive.

   This statement is not intended to be a substitute for the reasons of the High Court or to be used in
    any later consideration of the Court’s reasons.




                   Please direct enquiries to Ben Wickham, Senior Executive Deputy Registrar
                                            Telephone: (02) 6270 6893
                       Email: bwickham@hcourt.gov.au          Website: www.hcourt.gov.au

More Related Content

What's hot

Full 2012 FTC report into suspected antitrust by Google (via WSJ)
Full 2012 FTC report into suspected antitrust by Google (via WSJ)Full 2012 FTC report into suspected antitrust by Google (via WSJ)
Full 2012 FTC report into suspected antitrust by Google (via WSJ)Tric Park
 
Jil ammori antitrust argument
Jil ammori antitrust argumentJil ammori antitrust argument
Jil ammori antitrust argumentGreg Sterling
 
Google in China presentation by pankaj
Google in China presentation by pankajGoogle in China presentation by pankaj
Google in China presentation by pankajPankaj Joshi
 
Content, Control and Socially Networked Media
Content, Control and Socially Networked MediaContent, Control and Socially Networked Media
Content, Control and Socially Networked MediaJon Garon
 
The Power of Google: A Review of the 2011 Senate Subcommittee Hearing
The Power of Google: A Review of the 2011 Senate Subcommittee HearingThe Power of Google: A Review of the 2011 Senate Subcommittee Hearing
The Power of Google: A Review of the 2011 Senate Subcommittee HearingShanna Kurpe
 
Google In China
Google In ChinaGoogle In China
Google In ChinaArup Ghosh
 
Google in China presentation
Google in China presentationGoogle in China presentation
Google in China presentationguestfbc5d4
 
Point of View on Cambridge Analytica Scandal
Point of View on Cambridge Analytica Scandal Point of View on Cambridge Analytica Scandal
Point of View on Cambridge Analytica Scandal Ogilvy
 
Google's Negotiations with the Chinese Government in 2010
Google's Negotiations with the Chinese Government in 2010Google's Negotiations with the Chinese Government in 2010
Google's Negotiations with the Chinese Government in 2010Ankur Saxena
 
Volokh first amendment paper
Volokh first amendment paperVolokh first amendment paper
Volokh first amendment paperGreg Sterling
 
The value of search in eParticipation
The value of search in eParticipationThe value of search in eParticipation
The value of search in eParticipationFraser Henderson
 
Paradise by the DASHBOARD Act?
Paradise by the DASHBOARD Act?Paradise by the DASHBOARD Act?
Paradise by the DASHBOARD Act?Maxx Cook
 
Six months later – a report card on google’s demotion of pirate sites
Six months later – a report card on google’s demotion of pirate sitesSix months later – a report card on google’s demotion of pirate sites
Six months later – a report card on google’s demotion of pirate sitesYury Chemerkin
 
Google case study
Google case studyGoogle case study
Google case studystacian
 
The New York Times Paywall Case Study
The New York Times Paywall Case StudyThe New York Times Paywall Case Study
The New York Times Paywall Case StudyTANUSHREE BOSE
 
How to be a social media influencer...and the legal issues to watch out for
How to be a social media influencer...and the legal issues to watch out forHow to be a social media influencer...and the legal issues to watch out for
How to be a social media influencer...and the legal issues to watch out forMcPhearson TVHolden
 

What's hot (20)

Full 2012 FTC report into suspected antitrust by Google (via WSJ)
Full 2012 FTC report into suspected antitrust by Google (via WSJ)Full 2012 FTC report into suspected antitrust by Google (via WSJ)
Full 2012 FTC report into suspected antitrust by Google (via WSJ)
 
Complaint
ComplaintComplaint
Complaint
 
Bericht icomp vol4
Bericht icomp vol4Bericht icomp vol4
Bericht icomp vol4
 
Jil ammori antitrust argument
Jil ammori antitrust argumentJil ammori antitrust argument
Jil ammori antitrust argument
 
Google in China presentation by pankaj
Google in China presentation by pankajGoogle in China presentation by pankaj
Google in China presentation by pankaj
 
Content, Control and Socially Networked Media
Content, Control and Socially Networked MediaContent, Control and Socially Networked Media
Content, Control and Socially Networked Media
 
The Power of Google: A Review of the 2011 Senate Subcommittee Hearing
The Power of Google: A Review of the 2011 Senate Subcommittee HearingThe Power of Google: A Review of the 2011 Senate Subcommittee Hearing
The Power of Google: A Review of the 2011 Senate Subcommittee Hearing
 
Google In China
Google In ChinaGoogle In China
Google In China
 
Google in China presentation
Google in China presentationGoogle in China presentation
Google in China presentation
 
Point of View on Cambridge Analytica Scandal
Point of View on Cambridge Analytica Scandal Point of View on Cambridge Analytica Scandal
Point of View on Cambridge Analytica Scandal
 
29 business i environment i society mba 2016
29 business i environment i society mba 201629 business i environment i society mba 2016
29 business i environment i society mba 2016
 
Google in China
Google in ChinaGoogle in China
Google in China
 
Google's Negotiations with the Chinese Government in 2010
Google's Negotiations with the Chinese Government in 2010Google's Negotiations with the Chinese Government in 2010
Google's Negotiations with the Chinese Government in 2010
 
Volokh first amendment paper
Volokh first amendment paperVolokh first amendment paper
Volokh first amendment paper
 
The value of search in eParticipation
The value of search in eParticipationThe value of search in eParticipation
The value of search in eParticipation
 
Paradise by the DASHBOARD Act?
Paradise by the DASHBOARD Act?Paradise by the DASHBOARD Act?
Paradise by the DASHBOARD Act?
 
Six months later – a report card on google’s demotion of pirate sites
Six months later – a report card on google’s demotion of pirate sitesSix months later – a report card on google’s demotion of pirate sites
Six months later – a report card on google’s demotion of pirate sites
 
Google case study
Google case studyGoogle case study
Google case study
 
The New York Times Paywall Case Study
The New York Times Paywall Case StudyThe New York Times Paywall Case Study
The New York Times Paywall Case Study
 
How to be a social media influencer...and the legal issues to watch out for
How to be a social media influencer...and the legal issues to watch out forHow to be a social media influencer...and the legal issues to watch out for
How to be a social media influencer...and the legal issues to watch out for
 

Viewers also liked

Designing for Love by Danielle Breckon at Girl Geek Sydney December 2011
Designing for Love by Danielle Breckon at Girl Geek Sydney December 2011Designing for Love by Danielle Breckon at Girl Geek Sydney December 2011
Designing for Love by Danielle Breckon at Girl Geek Sydney December 2011daniib
 
CliTypes and usefulness of Assistiveck to Edit
CliTypes and usefulness of Assistiveck to EditCliTypes and usefulness of Assistiveck to Edit
CliTypes and usefulness of Assistiveck to Editesma05
 
Curriculo I / Adriana Enríquez
Curriculo I / Adriana EnríquezCurriculo I / Adriana Enríquez
Curriculo I / Adriana Enríquezadrianamaribel123
 
próceres de la independencia de colombia
próceres de la independencia de colombia próceres de la independencia de colombia
próceres de la independencia de colombia darlleris
 
Return on Investment: thoughts about social media
Return on Investment: thoughts about social mediaReturn on Investment: thoughts about social media
Return on Investment: thoughts about social mediaPaperCliQ Comunicação
 
Legislacion publicitaria
Legislacion publicitariaLegislacion publicitaria
Legislacion publicitariafranc_moguea
 
Redalyc garfinkel
Redalyc garfinkelRedalyc garfinkel
Redalyc garfinkelIvan Felix
 
3.10.1 Globalisation Definitions And Characteristics
3.10.1 Globalisation Definitions And Characteristics3.10.1 Globalisation Definitions And Characteristics
3.10.1 Globalisation Definitions And Characteristicstudorgeog
 
Vida y obra de simón bolívar
Vida y obra de simón bolívarVida y obra de simón bolívar
Vida y obra de simón bolívarcyberjosmar
 

Viewers also liked (15)

Designing for Love by Danielle Breckon at Girl Geek Sydney December 2011
Designing for Love by Danielle Breckon at Girl Geek Sydney December 2011Designing for Love by Danielle Breckon at Girl Geek Sydney December 2011
Designing for Love by Danielle Breckon at Girl Geek Sydney December 2011
 
Corrected copy of Essay on
Corrected copy of Essay onCorrected copy of Essay on
Corrected copy of Essay on
 
sarahCV2016
sarahCV2016sarahCV2016
sarahCV2016
 
xD segundo intento ewe
xD segundo intento ewexD segundo intento ewe
xD segundo intento ewe
 
CliTypes and usefulness of Assistiveck to Edit
CliTypes and usefulness of Assistiveck to EditCliTypes and usefulness of Assistiveck to Edit
CliTypes and usefulness of Assistiveck to Edit
 
Man with van hire wimbledon
Man with van hire wimbledonMan with van hire wimbledon
Man with van hire wimbledon
 
Curriculo I / Adriana Enríquez
Curriculo I / Adriana EnríquezCurriculo I / Adriana Enríquez
Curriculo I / Adriana Enríquez
 
próceres de la independencia de colombia
próceres de la independencia de colombia próceres de la independencia de colombia
próceres de la independencia de colombia
 
Return on Investment: thoughts about social media
Return on Investment: thoughts about social mediaReturn on Investment: thoughts about social media
Return on Investment: thoughts about social media
 
Legislacion publicitaria
Legislacion publicitariaLegislacion publicitaria
Legislacion publicitaria
 
Redalyc garfinkel
Redalyc garfinkelRedalyc garfinkel
Redalyc garfinkel
 
Manuel Pardo y Lavalle
Manuel Pardo y LavalleManuel Pardo y Lavalle
Manuel Pardo y Lavalle
 
3.10.1 Globalisation Definitions And Characteristics
3.10.1 Globalisation Definitions And Characteristics3.10.1 Globalisation Definitions And Characteristics
3.10.1 Globalisation Definitions And Characteristics
 
Vida y obra de simón bolívar
Vida y obra de simón bolívarVida y obra de simón bolívar
Vida y obra de simón bolívar
 
Kryzys 1 0
Kryzys 1 0Kryzys 1 0
Kryzys 1 0
 

Similar to Google v accc_pr_-_final

Google search bias letter 2016 01-26(1)-1
Google search bias letter 2016 01-26(1)-1Google search bias letter 2016 01-26(1)-1
Google search bias letter 2016 01-26(1)-1Greg Sterling
 
The Google Monopolization Strategy
The Google Monopolization StrategyThe Google Monopolization Strategy
The Google Monopolization StrategyScott Cleland
 
Gurminder Singh vs. Google LLC
Gurminder Singh vs. Google LLCGurminder Singh vs. Google LLC
Gurminder Singh vs. Google LLCJeff Martinez
 
Google Policy Primer
Google Policy PrimerGoogle Policy Primer
Google Policy PrimerIrene Pollak
 
Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment Against Rosetta Stone in Closely Wat...
Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment Against Rosetta Stone in Closely Wat...Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment Against Rosetta Stone in Closely Wat...
Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment Against Rosetta Stone in Closely Wat...Patton Boggs LLP
 
One policy, one Google experience
One policy, one Google experienceOne policy, one Google experience
One policy, one Google experienceiProspect
 
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conferenceBlake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conferenceBlake Morgan
 
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conferenceBlake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conferenceBlake Morgan
 
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conferenceBlake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conferenceBlake Morgan
 
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conferenceBlake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conferenceBlake Morgan
 
Google Recommendations and Implementations Strategies
Google Recommendations and Implementations StrategiesGoogle Recommendations and Implementations Strategies
Google Recommendations and Implementations Strategiesgbrynza
 
Upheld Google had Abused its Dominant Position - Brandsmiths.pdf
Upheld Google had Abused its Dominant Position - Brandsmiths.pdfUpheld Google had Abused its Dominant Position - Brandsmiths.pdf
Upheld Google had Abused its Dominant Position - Brandsmiths.pdfonline Marketing
 
Google Adwords and Meta-Tag litigation
Google Adwords and Meta-Tag litigation Google Adwords and Meta-Tag litigation
Google Adwords and Meta-Tag litigation Len Mancini
 

Similar to Google v accc_pr_-_final (20)

Google fined by cci
Google fined by cciGoogle fined by cci
Google fined by cci
 
Ftc ocr-watermark
Ftc ocr-watermarkFtc ocr-watermark
Ftc ocr-watermark
 
Google search bias letter 2016 01-26(1)-1
Google search bias letter 2016 01-26(1)-1Google search bias letter 2016 01-26(1)-1
Google search bias letter 2016 01-26(1)-1
 
Addendum to the Google Blogger Agreement
Addendum to the Google Blogger AgreementAddendum to the Google Blogger Agreement
Addendum to the Google Blogger Agreement
 
Google
GoogleGoogle
Google
 
Addendum to Google Visualization API Terms of Service (TOS)
Addendum to Google Visualization API Terms of Service (TOS)Addendum to Google Visualization API Terms of Service (TOS)
Addendum to Google Visualization API Terms of Service (TOS)
 
The Google Monopolization Strategy
The Google Monopolization StrategyThe Google Monopolization Strategy
The Google Monopolization Strategy
 
Gurminder Singh vs. Google LLC
Gurminder Singh vs. Google LLCGurminder Singh vs. Google LLC
Gurminder Singh vs. Google LLC
 
Google Policy Primer
Google Policy PrimerGoogle Policy Primer
Google Policy Primer
 
Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment Against Rosetta Stone in Closely Wat...
Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment Against Rosetta Stone in Closely Wat...Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment Against Rosetta Stone in Closely Wat...
Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment Against Rosetta Stone in Closely Wat...
 
One policy, one Google experience
One policy, one Google experienceOne policy, one Google experience
One policy, one Google experience
 
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conferenceBlake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
 
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conferenceBlake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
 
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conferenceBlake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
 
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conferenceBlake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
Blake Lapthorn hosts inaugural TAG - IP speciality conference
 
TAGLaw IP seminar
TAGLaw IP seminarTAGLaw IP seminar
TAGLaw IP seminar
 
You Can't Copyright Facts
You Can't Copyright FactsYou Can't Copyright Facts
You Can't Copyright Facts
 
Google Recommendations and Implementations Strategies
Google Recommendations and Implementations StrategiesGoogle Recommendations and Implementations Strategies
Google Recommendations and Implementations Strategies
 
Upheld Google had Abused its Dominant Position - Brandsmiths.pdf
Upheld Google had Abused its Dominant Position - Brandsmiths.pdfUpheld Google had Abused its Dominant Position - Brandsmiths.pdf
Upheld Google had Abused its Dominant Position - Brandsmiths.pdf
 
Google Adwords and Meta-Tag litigation
Google Adwords and Meta-Tag litigation Google Adwords and Meta-Tag litigation
Google Adwords and Meta-Tag litigation
 

More from Greg Sterling

Ab 1760 -_amendments
Ab 1760 -_amendmentsAb 1760 -_amendments
Ab 1760 -_amendmentsGreg Sterling
 
Joint ad trade letter to ag becerra re ccpa 1.31.2019
Joint ad trade letter to ag becerra re ccpa 1.31.2019Joint ad trade letter to ag becerra re ccpa 1.31.2019
Joint ad trade letter to ag becerra re ccpa 1.31.2019Greg Sterling
 
Goldman v breitbart_-_opinion
Goldman v breitbart_-_opinionGoldman v breitbart_-_opinion
Goldman v breitbart_-_opinionGreg Sterling
 
Google genericide-cert-petition
Google genericide-cert-petitionGoogle genericide-cert-petition
Google genericide-cert-petitionGreg Sterling
 
Filed copy-first-amended-complaint-baldino-v-google-january-13-2017-1
Filed copy-first-amended-complaint-baldino-v-google-january-13-2017-1Filed copy-first-amended-complaint-baldino-v-google-january-13-2017-1
Filed copy-first-amended-complaint-baldino-v-google-january-13-2017-1Greg Sterling
 
Amazon motion to quash echo-search
Amazon motion to quash echo-searchAmazon motion to quash echo-search
Amazon motion to quash echo-searchGreg Sterling
 
170206 vizio 2017.02.06_complaint
170206 vizio 2017.02.06_complaint170206 vizio 2017.02.06_complaint
170206 vizio 2017.02.06_complaintGreg Sterling
 
1 2016-593-en-f1-1-1
1 2016-593-en-f1-1-11 2016-593-en-f1-1-1
1 2016-593-en-f1-1-1Greg Sterling
 
European Court of Justice Press Release GS Media vs. Sanoma
European Court of Justice Press Release GS Media vs. SanomaEuropean Court of Justice Press Release GS Media vs. Sanoma
European Court of Justice Press Release GS Media vs. SanomaGreg Sterling
 
How google fights piracy 2016
How google fights piracy 2016How google fights piracy 2016
How google fights piracy 2016Greg Sterling
 
Google viacom-kids-cookie-tracking
Google viacom-kids-cookie-trackingGoogle viacom-kids-cookie-tracking
Google viacom-kids-cookie-trackingGreg Sterling
 
FTC Complaint v InMobi
FTC Complaint v InMobiFTC Complaint v InMobi
FTC Complaint v InMobiGreg Sterling
 
160315lordandtaylcmpt
160315lordandtaylcmpt160315lordandtaylcmpt
160315lordandtaylcmptGreg Sterling
 
Uber Promotions vs Uber Technologies
Uber Promotions vs Uber Technologies Uber Promotions vs Uber Technologies
Uber Promotions vs Uber Technologies Greg Sterling
 
Judge Pym order iphone
Judge Pym order iphoneJudge Pym order iphone
Judge Pym order iphoneGreg Sterling
 
Communication from the commission to the institutions december2015
Communication from the commission to the institutions december2015Communication from the commission to the institutions december2015
Communication from the commission to the institutions december2015Greg Sterling
 
CJEU decision on Schrems
CJEU decision on SchremsCJEU decision on Schrems
CJEU decision on SchremsGreg Sterling
 
Complaint Google v. Local Lighthouse
Complaint Google v. Local LighthouseComplaint Google v. Local Lighthouse
Complaint Google v. Local LighthouseGreg Sterling
 

More from Greg Sterling (20)

Ab 1760 -_amendments
Ab 1760 -_amendmentsAb 1760 -_amendments
Ab 1760 -_amendments
 
Joint ad trade letter to ag becerra re ccpa 1.31.2019
Joint ad trade letter to ag becerra re ccpa 1.31.2019Joint ad trade letter to ag becerra re ccpa 1.31.2019
Joint ad trade letter to ag becerra re ccpa 1.31.2019
 
Goldman v breitbart_-_opinion
Goldman v breitbart_-_opinionGoldman v breitbart_-_opinion
Goldman v breitbart_-_opinion
 
Google genericide-cert-petition
Google genericide-cert-petitionGoogle genericide-cert-petition
Google genericide-cert-petition
 
Elliott v. google
Elliott v. googleElliott v. google
Elliott v. google
 
Filed copy-first-amended-complaint-baldino-v-google-january-13-2017-1
Filed copy-first-amended-complaint-baldino-v-google-january-13-2017-1Filed copy-first-amended-complaint-baldino-v-google-january-13-2017-1
Filed copy-first-amended-complaint-baldino-v-google-january-13-2017-1
 
Amazon motion to quash echo-search
Amazon motion to quash echo-searchAmazon motion to quash echo-search
Amazon motion to quash echo-search
 
170206 vizio 2017.02.06_complaint
170206 vizio 2017.02.06_complaint170206 vizio 2017.02.06_complaint
170206 vizio 2017.02.06_complaint
 
1 2016-593-en-f1-1-1
1 2016-593-en-f1-1-11 2016-593-en-f1-1-1
1 2016-593-en-f1-1-1
 
European Court of Justice Press Release GS Media vs. Sanoma
European Court of Justice Press Release GS Media vs. SanomaEuropean Court of Justice Press Release GS Media vs. Sanoma
European Court of Justice Press Release GS Media vs. Sanoma
 
How google fights piracy 2016
How google fights piracy 2016How google fights piracy 2016
How google fights piracy 2016
 
Google viacom-kids-cookie-tracking
Google viacom-kids-cookie-trackingGoogle viacom-kids-cookie-tracking
Google viacom-kids-cookie-tracking
 
FTC Complaint v InMobi
FTC Complaint v InMobiFTC Complaint v InMobi
FTC Complaint v InMobi
 
160315lordandtaylcmpt
160315lordandtaylcmpt160315lordandtaylcmpt
160315lordandtaylcmpt
 
Weiss vs google
Weiss vs googleWeiss vs google
Weiss vs google
 
Uber Promotions vs Uber Technologies
Uber Promotions vs Uber Technologies Uber Promotions vs Uber Technologies
Uber Promotions vs Uber Technologies
 
Judge Pym order iphone
Judge Pym order iphoneJudge Pym order iphone
Judge Pym order iphone
 
Communication from the commission to the institutions december2015
Communication from the commission to the institutions december2015Communication from the commission to the institutions december2015
Communication from the commission to the institutions december2015
 
CJEU decision on Schrems
CJEU decision on SchremsCJEU decision on Schrems
CJEU decision on Schrems
 
Complaint Google v. Local Lighthouse
Complaint Google v. Local LighthouseComplaint Google v. Local Lighthouse
Complaint Google v. Local Lighthouse
 

Google v accc_pr_-_final

  • 1. HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA 6 February 2013 GOOGLE INC v AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION [2013] HCA 1 Today the High Court unanimously allowed an appeal from a decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, in which it was found that Google Inc ("Google") had engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct contrary to s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ("the Act") by displaying certain internet search results. The Google search engine displayed two types of search results in response to a user's search request: "organic search results" and "sponsored links". Organic search results were links to web pages that were ranked in order of relevance to the search terms entered by the user. A sponsored link was a form of advertisement. Each sponsored link was created by, or at the direction of, an advertiser, who paid Google to display advertising text which directed users to a web site of the advertiser's choosing. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission ("the ACCC") claimed that particular sponsored links displayed by the Google search engine between 2005 and 2008 had conveyed misleading and deceptive representations. By publishing or displaying those search results, Google was said to have contravened s 52 of the Act, which provided that a corporation shall not, in trade or commerce, engage in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or is likely to mislead or deceive. At first instance, the primary judge found that although the impugned representations were misleading and deceptive, those representations had not been made by Google. Ordinary and reasonable members of the relevant class of consumers who might be affected by the alleged conduct would have understood that sponsored links were advertisements and would not have understood Google to have endorsed or to have been responsible in any meaningful way for the content of those advertisements. The ACCC successfully appealed to the Full Court of the Federal Court, which unanimously found that Google had itself engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct by publishing and displaying the sponsored links. By special leave, Google appealed to the High Court. The High Court unanimously allowed the appeal. Google did not create the sponsored links that it published or displayed. Ordinary and reasonable users of the Google search engine would have understood that the representations conveyed by the sponsored links were those of the advertisers, and would not have concluded that Google adopted or endorsed the representations. Accordingly, Google did not engage in conduct that was misleading or deceptive.  This statement is not intended to be a substitute for the reasons of the High Court or to be used in any later consideration of the Court’s reasons. Please direct enquiries to Ben Wickham, Senior Executive Deputy Registrar Telephone: (02) 6270 6893 Email: bwickham@hcourt.gov.au Website: www.hcourt.gov.au