Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked
Similar to Riak at shareaholic
Similar to Riak at shareaholic (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Riak at shareaholic
- 1. Riak @ Robby Grossman robby@shareaholic.com @freerobby
- 2. Agenda Shareaholic: Product & Tech Why Riak: The Search for a Big Data Store Transitioning to Riak Riak Use Cases Deploying to EC2
- 3. What’s ?
- 8. Monthly @ Thousands of developers hitting API Hundreds of thousands of publishers Tens of millions of shares & clicks Hundreds of millions of pageviews & events
- 9. Tech @ JRuby on Rails (via Torquebox) MySQL (Master, Read Slave) Elastic MapReduce (similar to Hadoop) Redis Formerly Mongo, Now Riak
- 10. Why Not Mongo? Working set needs to fit in memory Global write lock blocks all queries despite not having transactions/joins Standbys not “hot”
- 11. Why Riak?
- 12. Next @ Options: Goals: HBase Linear scalability Cassandra Full-text search Riak Flexible indexing Easier Devops
- 13. HBase Pros Cons Battle tested Complex Architecture High performance SPOFs Requires Hive for Indexing/Querying Expensive to deploy at small scale
- 14. Cassandra Pros Cons Native secondary Known users all indices domain experts Linear scalability Search requires Lucene Tunable CAP Heavy Weight MapReduce
- 15. Riak Pros Cons Operationally simpler Multi-data center replication requires Linear scalability Enterprise product Integrated search leveldb puts high strain on CPU Secondary indices Tunable CAP Vector clocks solve time-sync problems
- 16. From Mongo to Riak
- 17. Migration Goals No time where database goes “offline” Product parity throughout migration
- 18. Migration Process 1. App writes to Mongo and Riak 2. Verify data integrity 3. Import historical data 4. App reads from Riak 5. Decommission Mongo
- 19. Use Cases
- 20. Share API Save shared content Uses MapReduce to populate user dashboard
- 21. Recommendations Sets of related pages Generated on-demand
- 22. Publisher Analytics Generated nightly via Hadoop Typical stored “document” (JSON) 80kb-1Mb
- 23. Riak Successes
- 24. MapReduce Handy for querying Runs at “web page speed”. Easy to re-reduce for complex queries Easy to test via CURL
- 25. Tunable CAP @ Replication: primary/secondary authority Read failure tolerance: speed/consistency Write failure tolerance
- 26. Full Text Search Built on Lucene Make user content searchable Make arbitrary keys queryable “Just turn it on” Hiccup: corrupt merge indexes
- 27. Query Example Who’s our oldest user who’s shared something in the last minute? curl -XPOST http://localhost:8098/mapred -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{ "inputs": { "bucket":"links", "query":"timestamp:[1346350877 TO 1346350937}" //60 second period }, "query":[ {"map":{"language":"javascript","source":"function(riakObject) { return [[Riak.mapValuesJson(riakObject)[0].user_id]]; }"}}, {"reduce":{"language":"javascript", "name":"Riak.reduceMin" // [[2],[5],[9],[13]] => [[2]] }} ] }' [[2197]]
- 28. Riak on EC2
- 29. In a Nutshell EC2 specs poorly proportioned for leveldb Multiple AZs in one location works well Scale vertically for better latency & consistency Scale horizontally for more throughput/$
- 30. Benchmarks Top Graph: c1.medium (1.7G, 5 CPU) Middle: m1.large (7.5G, 4 CPU) Bottom: cc1.4xlarge (23G, 33.5 CPU)
- 31. Throughput
- 34. Calculations c1.medium (1.7G, 5 CPU) 1758 IOPS/$-hr Worst 1% of queries: 300ms/800ms m1.large (7.5G, 4 CPU) 1167 IOPS/$-hr Worst 1% of queries: 110ms/200ms cc1.4xlarge (23G, 33.5 CPU) 872 IOPS/$-hr Worst 1% of queries: 47ms/139ms
- 35. Benchmark Takeaways You can’t go “by spec” IO is limiting factor RAM never limiting factor for 1% of keyspace to be in memory
- 36. Fin. Questions? Thanks: We’re Hiring! Tom Santero Robby Grossman Justin Sheehy robby@shareaholic.com Ryan Zezeski @freerobby Reid Draper #freenode riak crew
- 37. Fin.