Dr King's Nobel Prize Speech Inspires Student

Dr King Nobel Peace Prize Speech Sparknotes
Dr. King's Nobel Peace Prize Lecture was one of the most powerful reading assignments during my
first year in the United States. As an international student from Saudi Arabia, I never imagined that
one person could change the world. Dr. King believed in "non–violence" in order to obtain social
justice, racial integration, and civil rights. In essence, Dr. King's speech represented the progressive
nature of the United States and it motivated me to become a future leader in my home county, Saudi
Arabia.
Dr. Martin Luther King's Nobel Peace Prize speech is an academic piece of writing which
documents his beliefs on nonviolence over his career. It was my first experience with political
writing since this form of freedom of expression is illegal ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
King believed that violence is both impractical and immoral. King was an ordained Baptist minister,
who embraced the tenets of Christianity and wholeheartedly preached brotherhood, peace, and love
for all men–including white and blacks, alike. King believed "Violence as a way of achieving racial
justice is both impractical and immoral. I am not unmindful of the fact that violence often brings
about momentary results" (King, 1964, pg. 8). Subsequently, King did not believe in violence and
preached non–violence. King felt that nonviolence was the only means to fight oppression, racism,
and injustice. King preached tenets of universal love; moreover, King fought against despair, racial
separatism, and hate. King's message is extremely inspiring and speaks to be broad audience,
including residents of the Middle East. The equality of races can only be achieved through peaceful
arguments and demonstrations. For myself, nonviolence is the only legitimate weapon against
fighting social injustice. King's message could be interpreted and applied to any situation or
community. For myself, hate and revenge can be only be dominated through the application of
nonviolence. King also spoke about bringing about the end to war and poverty through collective
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Zanjeer: The Nobel Morality Prize
I am writing on behalf of Zanjeer to nominate them for the Nobel Morality Award. I believe that
Zanjeer should be awarded this because I think that even through his many tough experiences he
was still able to show morality through his acts. I am wanting for you to consider Zanjeer as a
possible nobel prize winner. I think that he deserves this prize because even though he had been
through hard times he still came out on top. Through these moments Zanjeer had to gain many
different character traits in order to do his best. Many of these traits had formed him into the dog
that he was, and even through all of the rough patches, he was able to help others who needed all of
the help they could get. One of the main character traits that he gained was courage. He was able to
go into the bombing area and was able to detect more than 3,329 kgs of the explosive RDX, also
known as Research Department Formula. He was also able to find 600 detonators, almost 249 hand
grenades and 6406 rounds of live ammunition. In this bombing 257 people ended up dying and
leaving 713 people injured. He found most explosives, but he wasn't able to get them all. Although
he could not find them all, he was able to help a lot by moving all of the explosives out that he
could. He also had to have a lot of determination and I believe that ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
I think that even though he is just a dog, he could still be a great example of a hardworking and
moral figure. I want you to consider Zanjeer as you nominate the winners. I believe that Zanjeer
would be the best winner for the Nobel Morality Award, and at the same time be remembered for his
legacy. He was a very hardworking dog, and even though Zanjeer is not with us, his mark was left
on the hearts of the people he helped saved. I want to have Zanjeer's hardwork and dedication be
able to inspire others, and to help with that you could consider Zanjeer for the winner of the Nobel
Morality

William Faulkner's Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech and its...
William Faulkner's Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech and its Relevance
William Faulkner's Nobel Prize acceptance speech is a dynamic statement that challenges the writer
and man to not simply sit around and watch the end of man, but to help man endure and prevail.
Faulkner refuses to accept the naturalists theme that human beings are dominated, controlled, and
overwhelmed by their environment and nature. He does not accept the end of man, but rather says
that man will prevail. Though many have accepted the easy way out by saying man will simply
endure because one can hear his soft, inexhaustible voice even after death, Faulkner also refuses
this. He says man will not only endure, but he shall prevail or triumph over death. Man will ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Eliot. Eliot wrote about man's effort to transcend the force of time and man's effort to achieve the
timelessness of the eternal. His writings reflect his own personal themes and direction of his life: the
quest for eternal salvation. He believes one can "endure and prevail' as Faulkner does as evident in
"The Wasteland". "The Wasteland" emphasizes the decay of the western civilization, yet there was
hope and courage in the writings. Eliot joins William Faulkner in the argument that man controls his
own destiny.
Along with many other authors, Stephen Crane would disagree with Eliot and Faulkner on their
views because he was a naturalistic author. Crane saw human beings as wholly controlled by their
environment and their heredity. "The Open Boat" expresses Crane's naturalistic qualities showing
men having no control over their destiny as they are stuck in the ocean and are controlled by the sea.
Although Crane is seen as a naturalist writer, he is also seen as a Christian symbolist expressing
ultimate understanding of faith and the redemption of people.
Robert Frost, like Stephen Crane, also was a naturalist writer and would disagree with Faulkner. He
believed man had no free will and man would become the sum of your choices. Frost writes in
ordinary speech as Faulkner did in his Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech.
Like Frost and Crane, Eugene O'Neill also expressed a naturalistic point of view on his writings.
O'Neill's naturalistic

The Nobel Prize for Literature: Argumentative Essay on Bob...
Dear Nobel Committee for Literature, The Nobel Prize for Literature was not rewarded to the
deserving writer. You have awarded Bob Dylan the Nobel Prize for Literature on October 13, 2016
degrading dedicated writers around the world. After dropping out of college in the 1960's to pursue
an occupation in which he was already well known as the times "most loved folk poet", he turned to
singing and writing rock–type songs with anti war messages. Whether he did "create new poetic
expressions within the great American tradition" he has not proven himself worthy of such a
significant award. Such a legendary award offered to many other brilliant writers, should be
received by someone who can and will continue to change the world. This award could help out
developing writers, developing countries, and should not be handed out single handedly. Newly
prospering authors and writers deserve as much a chance as anyone. As you may recall, a few of the
runner ups for the Nobel laureate were Adonis, Ngugi Wa Thiong'o, and Ko Un. All of these authors
shared unique talents in writing. In point of fact, Adonis, a Syrian essayist, translator, and poet,
experimented with essential elements in his poetry. He rebelled against the standard poets to say the
least, "I wanted to break the linearity of poetic text – to mess with it, if you will."
(poetryfoundation.org) He was not born into the wealthiest of families and found himself unable to
pay for education, yet he has pushed boundaries for many

Essay About Nobel Peace Prize 2010
Introduction: On October 8, The Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo was named the winner of this year's
Nobel Peace Prize by the decision of the Norwegian Nobel Committee. An overwhelming majority
of governments and organizations around the world appreciate the dedication of Liu for his long
time pursuing of human–rights improvement in China. Be that as it may, China has blockaded the
news which sounds ridiculous to the standpoint of almost all the Chinese people. Recently, the
comments of this controversial phenomenon, not exaggerative to say, as one falls another rises. In
my point of view it's not a problem of who is right or wrong, which importantly counts is the respect
for China. Closely following behind are the statements and analyses. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
To be honest, China may not do well enough in some parts. Nevertheless, no country is perfect in
every aspect. In this case, I think we should bridge the cultural differences between China and other
countries, which hopefully leading to understanding, tolerance and even appreciation of different
cultures and customs, which is the very theme of "avatar". Anyhow, China is not a queen who not
only reign but also rain. None of the country leaders do not want to gain the peacefulness through
their governance. People should be endowed with a global perspective to prevent their views and
ideas from being too one–sided or suburban by listening to, comparing and even absorbing different
opinions. Sometimes foreigner should stand at our side to rethink about the question in hand. Will
you allow a non necessary reform appear along with disorders in public, while most of us live in
happiness and satisfy with the measures country adopts now? ③the relationship between two
countries Norway has been left scrambling to contain damage to its relations with China after the
award of the Nobel peace prize to a Chinese dissident caused anger in Beijing. "We wish to continue
our fruitful co–operation in all fields with China," Norwegian foreign ministry spokeswoman
Ragnhild Imerslund said. According to the statements of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, the award of
the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu will bring damage to two–way relations. The Beijing government

Antoine-Henri Becquerel's Nobel Prize
I was so excited to wake up today. It is the year 1903. All of my difficult work has finally paid off!
Today is the day I will receive a Nobel Prize. It's not only me who is being awarded this prestigious
prize. My husband, Pierre Curie, and my colleague, Antoine–Henri Becquerel, are sharing this prize
with me as well. Sadly, my husband or I cannot attend due to the fact that we are too sick. We have
all dedicated numerous hours to earn award. Everyone has sacrificed something to make this
discovery. I, myself, have worked super hard to receive an education. I grew up in Poland and the
Russians did not want us to have an education, although I was quite intelligent. I eventually was so
determined to obtain an education that I moved to Paris. It was incredibly expensive there to the
point to which I could barely afford to survive. I could afford little food, but I was too stubborn to
ask someone for money. Since I could not afford food, on occasion I fainted in class due to a lack of
it. In addition, I spent the majority of my money on my education. Without being educated, I would
not have been able to discover what I did in order to receive a Nobel Prize along with my colleagues
who have also worked very hard. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He discovered Becquerel rays, which are forms of energy that come from uranium. At the time I
needed to write my dissertation, so he suggested that I find something else that is similar to uranium.
He is the one who got my project

Criteria For A Nobel Prize
Criteria for a Nobel Prize in Leadership Alan Weber (2009) wrote an article for the Washington Post,
that focused on the criteria that one might use to suggest a nominee. In his article, Weber offered
that candidacy for the prize should not be base upon "achievement broadly defined, or abstract
qualities that can be attributed to leaders, but clear and undeniable moral authority" (Weber, 2009,
para.1). Cook (2009) added that he would choose a nominee "who has pretty much transcended his
or her own ego, and who sees humanity as interconnected in a vast system to which we all,
ultimately, are contributing"(Cook, 2009, para.4). While these points provide a good starting point
for selection the development of selection criteria, I have demined that any individual who would be
a candidate for a Nobel Prize in Pauline Leadership should be characterized by the following the
following:
Demonstrated Christ Centered Core Values
Unwavering Sense of Mission and Purpose
Alignment of Character, Ethics, and Actions (Bradberry & Greaves, 2012)
Servant Orientation
Leads by Example
Humility
Self Discipline (Lee, 2003)
Equipping or Developing Others (Lee, 2003)
Lasting Concern for the Broader Community
Influence and Impact
Explanation of the First Nobel Laureate As Lutheran Pastor, it should not be a surprise that I have
chosen the 16th Century Reformer Martin Luther as the first Nobel Laureate in Pauline Leadership.
Martin Luther was an Augustinian monk and priest,

Why Gilbert Lewis Won The Nobel Prize
Gilbert Lewis felt that he deserved to be in the Manhattan project and win the Nobel Prize. In
protest for not winning the Nobel Prize he resigned from many prestigious positions. After all, he
had been nominated 35 times, but he never won the Nobel Prize. This was due to personal reasons,
but also because he didn't go deeply in one field, instead he did a bit everywhere. He didn't make
any ground–breaking discovery. Lewis was also not selected for the Manhattan Project and wasn't
recognized as many of his colleagues at Berkeley were. He didn't have the cooperation that was vital
for a team that was going to be developed an atomic bomb. Also, his field of study didn't align with
the goal of the Manhattan Project. Lewis was busy studying the

Author of A Rose for Emily, William Faulkner's Nobel Prize...
All I have to say about A Rose for Emily is that she was a crazy person! Faulkner is a really worthy
and famous writer that has a lot to say in his writings and I think that he accomplishes that when he
writes. "On December 10, he delivered his acceptance speech to the academy in a voice so low and
rapid that few could make out what he was saying, but when his words were published in the
newspaper the following day, it was recognized for its brilliance; in later years, Faulkner's speech
would be lauded as the best speech ever given at a Nobel ceremony." (Padgett) When William
Faulkner gave his Nobel Acceptance Speech he had a quote in there and I think that he helped man
endure by lifting his heart in A Rose for Emily, he also shows how ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
There were a lot of different emotions that were represented in this selection, but Faulkner didn't tell
us that the characters were angry he used details to show us people's emotions. "Try to be better than
yourself. An artist is a creature driven by demons. He doesn't know why they choose him and he's
usually too busy to wonder why. He is completely amoral in that he will rob, borrow, beg, or steal
from anybody and everybody to get the work done." (Faulkner/Stein) When he talks he uses a lot of
emotion and that shows his style of writing. William Faulkner gave a Nobel Prize Acceptance
Speech and in it he wrote about A Rose for Emily he gives himself challenges when he writes and
one of the challenges is pity and sacrifice which has been the glory of the past. When he writes he is
saying that the people who have had pity thrown upon them and the people who have made their
sacrifices are the only ones who get the glory. "The human drama in Faulkner's novels is then built
on the model of the actual, historical drama extending over almost a century and a half." (Faulkner)
In A Rose for Emily this is shown when all of those people who left her life she didn't really make a
big deal out of it she kept to

William Faulkner's Nobel Prize Acceptance
In his Nobel Prize acceptance speech renowned author William Faulkner stresses the importance of
moving on and curing the human spirit. By using rhetoric Faulkner successfully gives hope to his
audience making them look on the bright side and reminding authors of their power. He proves that
if humanity does not move forward they will be stuck in the gefing pity of the past. William
Faulkner does a very good job at using pathos to show the importance of having hope when all hope
is lost. Making the point that humanity should not "live under a curse" (William Faulkner Nobel
prize Acceptance speech), the speaker reminds the audience of a time before the war. He makes the
claim that if humanity does not relearn and rebuild what was once there then the will be stuck in the
same old routine. By listening to his advice the audience starts to gain a sense of hope. Faulkner also
uses pathos when he says he refuses to believe that humanity is doomed; he gives them a message of
rehabilitation to endure and prevail. Not only is he giving hope but also he is using pathos to get the
audience to move forward. Throughout the speech he ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He uses his credibility as an author to influence others to work harder and help humanity move on.
He encourages them to write about better days and the hope that humanity still has. Speaking
directly to the poets and authors Faulkner states " It is his privilege to help man endure by lifting his
heart, by reminding him of the courage and honor and hope and pride and compassion and pity and
sacrifice which have been the glory of his past." Using ethos he emphasises the importance of poets
and how strong their connection really is with the rest of the world. Faulkner assures his audience
that the pain will be worth it and writing about hope will help people look forward. He proves that if
writer can make the first move then humanity will follow in becoming

Wangari Maathai's Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech...
Wangari Maathai expresses her gratitude to the world for her Nobel Peace Prize, and also calls her
audience to action. Her goal is to convince the world that the environment has much more
importance than most people seem to realize. In her speech she begins by expressing her gratitude,
and persuading her audience that she is worth listening to. Second she discusses the importance of
the environment and explains how the Green Belt Movement has helped and changed the world. She
then clarifies the problems still occurring. After establishing the problems, she goes on to make her
call to action. Lastly, she ends by establishing pathos.
Maathai expresses her gratitude in the beginning of the speech. She thanks all the people that made
the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
She does this to ensure the listeners that taking care of the environment does much more than make
the world we live in look better. Taking care of the environment also takes part in ensuring a
successful democracy and many other important things in society. The idea that Maathai is
attempting to get across to everyone is that the Earth is our friend and we should give back what we
take. She helps us understand this by explaining the awful chain reactions that occur when we don't
replenish what we have consumed from Earth.
Third, she makes her call to action. She asks everyone to take part in something to help the
environment. She addresses each group of people separately. Men and women of all races, children,
young adults, everyone, can take part in something to help. "In the course of history, there comes a
time when humanity is called to shift to a new level of consciousness, to reach a higher moral
ground. A time when we have to shed our fear and give hope to each other. That time is now. (4)"
Her sentence structure of "That time is now," really gives emphasis on what she wants. It is short
and to the point. It's also a very simple sentence. She didn't replace simple words with fancier
words. This shows that what she is asking from people isn't rocket science. She is asking for
something as simple as planting trees or recycling. Her call to action is for everyone to contribute to
helping take care of the environment in some way.

Ele Wiesel Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech
January 30, 1933 forever marks the beginning of the Holocaust, one of the most horrifying and cruel
events in the history of the world. It was the mass genocide of millions of innocent jews, gays,
Jehovah Witnesses, gypsies, and countless others. After the Holocaust, it is clear to society that we,
as people, cannot stand by and watch as other human beings suffer from cruel acts in which they
have no ability to defend themselves. In modern day, it seems as though ethnic cleansing is
becoming less common, however, there are still many instances of it occurring around the world. In
fact, the country of Myanmar is currently attempting to deprive its Rohingya citizens of their basic
rights and exterminate them from the population.
There were many things to be learned from the Holocaust, one of the most important including
apathy toward discrimination and ethnic cleansing. In Elie Wiesel's Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance
Speech about his experienced imprisonment in concentration camps, he explained that people "must
always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the
tormentor, never the tormented". According to Wiesel, someone who stands by and does nothing
while another person suffers is just as guilty as the offender. Additionally, he states in his speech The
Perils of Indifference that, "Indifference reduces the other to an abstraction". A lack of compassion
toward the victims of cruel treatment shows that they are of no concern. Prisoners

Nobel Peace Prize Speech : Analysis Of Mother Teresa
Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech
Thousands of people struggling and were in poverty in India in the 70s, then a Catholic Nun named
Mother Teresa came to the rescue to fight poverty, abortion and comfort the dying in India,
specifically Calcutta. Mother Teresa, born Agnes Gonxha Bojaxhiu, was speaking in front of
hundreds if not thousands of people, giving her "Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech" in December
11, 1979 in Oslo, Norway. Mother Teresa received this prestigious award for her work, which she
give her everything to, also before receiving this award she also received numerous honour such as
Ramon Magsaysay Award and she also funded Missionaries of Charity. For all the works that she
done helping the poor in Calcutta, Catholic Church recognize her as "Saint Teresa of Calcutta". In
"Mother Teresa's Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech" by Mother Teresa, she used imagery,
polysyndeton and allusion to convince us of the importance of loving, sharing, giving and kindness.
Mother Teresa point out the importance of giving and kindness using imagery during her speech.
During the speech she talked about a man who was immobilize and smoking was his only
companion. She claims, "the other day I received 15 dollars from a man who was on his back for
twenty years, the only part that he can move is his right hand". Here we can see that even though the
15 dollars would've help the man with his cigarettes and he would've been happy for as long as it
last but instead he gave it to Mother Teresa because he knows that he wanted to help other people
too and giving the money to her made the man feels like he contributed in the poverty that Mother
Teresa is fighting. She also talk about how poor people can teach the rich and the fortunates. And
one day as continues on she talk about a woman who was dying and what the woman did and said to
Mother Teresa completely surprise her. She states, " I put her in bed and there was such a beautiful
smile on her face. She took hold of my hand, as she said one word only: Thank you and she died."
The source of her smile and words even as she died was the love that Mother Teresa had shown her
thus showing us the importance of love. Though both the man and the woman suffer a lot, Mother

Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech Analysis
There is no denying conflict. Everyone faces conflict of some sort in their lives, whether it be an
argument over which sibling gets to sit in the front seat of the car on the way to school, or a
potentially dangerous confrontation that necessitates an immediate reaction. Writers such as Susan
Campbell Bartoletti and Elie Wiesel, who wrote "Hitler Youth: Growing Up in Hitler's Shadow" and
"Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech" respectively, portray such situations. Bartoletti writes about how
one German girl faced conflict during World War Two, and Wiesel shares his personal experience as
a Jew in a concentration camp. Both works show that the most important aspect of facing a conflict
is the way in which a person chooses to deal with it. One could react to conflict by becoming angry
or sullen, shouting or going silent, or simply pouting. None of these reactions are the best –– some
can even be counterproductive to one's goals. The best way to deal with conflict is to take a stand for
one's beliefs. First off, standing up for one's beliefs creates many positive effects, for large groups of
people as well as for the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Hitler Youth: Growing Up in Hitler's Shadow." Studysync: Reading & Writing Companion.
Sonoma, CA: BookheadEd Learning, LLC, 2015. 397–400. Print.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. "Underage Drinking." National Institutes of
Health. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, n.d. Web. 24 Apr. 2017.
Nobel Media. "Liu Xiaobo – Facts." Nobelprize.org. Nobelprize.org, n.d. Web. 24 Apr. 2017.
Town Hall Meetings. "What's New." Town Hall Meetings To Prevent Underage Drinking. Stop
Alcohol Abuse, 4 Feb. 2011. Web. 24 Apr. 2017.
Wiesel, Elie. "Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech." Studysync: Reading & Writing Companion.
Sonoma, CA: BookheadEd Learning, LLC, 2015. 416–18. Print.
WorkLife4You. Communication Skills for Healthy Relationships. N.p.: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Association, n.d.

Nobel Prize Awarded to Randy W. Schekman, James E....
Each year, The Nobel Assembly in Karolinska Institutet distributes various Noble Prizes to
recipients who have demonstrated a monumental contribution to the sciences. In 2013, the 50
professors that constitute the Nobel Assembly awarded The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
to Randy W. Schekman, James E. Rothman, and Thomas C. Südhof for their contribution in
uncovering the details of vesicle transport within a cell. More specifically, these scientists have
elaborated on the knowledge of how cargo is delivered to the correct place within a eukaryotic cell
at the correct time.
The compartmentalized eukaryotic cell must retain the ability to ensure that correct vesicles are
shipped to the required destination at appropriate times. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In these mutant yeast cells, the typical vesicle transport system was abnormal, which allowed
detection of specific genes that were related to these mutations. These screenings eventually led to
the identification of twenty–three separate genes that could be classified into three groups based on
their effects on membranes involved in traffic. These membranes include the endoplasmic reticulum,
the Golgi Apparatus, and the plasma membrane (Novick and Schekman, 1979).
James Rothman dissected the transport mechanism by purifying and identifying proteins used in
transport. The NSF, SNAP and SNARE proteins act as docking sites to enable vesicles to fuse to
specific target membranes. This explains the precision of transport; the proteins only combined with
certain cargo. The ability to purify the NSF protein was made possible by the identification of the
VSV–G protein. The VSV–G protein is labeled by a sugar when it comes in contact with the Golgi
Apparatus, simplifying documentation. Genes code for proteins used in fusion, exemplified by how
the sec18 gene relates to NSF. Sec17 relates to the SNAP protein in a similar manner. The discovery
of the SNAP protein allowed for the revelation of SNARE proteins found in brain tissue. SNARE
proteins are a gateway to the fusion and docking of vesicles in a very specific manner: only an
exclusive number of target SNAREs (t–SNAREs) would bind to specific vesicle SNAREs, or v–
SNAREs

Alfred Nobel And The Nobel Peace Prize
When the word "peace" comes to mind, one usually thinks about tranquility or absent from violence
but when learning about Alfred Nobel, one learns that the products he invented were far from
"peaceful" in some eyes. The Nobel Peace Prize was created because Nobel left in his will that his
fortune was to be given as awards in the areas of: peace, chemistry, physiology, and literature.
Alfred Nobel himself started with nothing and ended with a large fortune, and as for The Nobel
Peace Prize, it has evolved over the last century into new ways no one saw occurring in the future.
Alfred Nobel was born into bankruptcy in 1833 to Immanual Nobel and Andriette Ahlsell.
According to Nils Ringertz, Alfred's father was eventually able to provide a "first–class" education
to his sons that taught them language, sciences, and literature. At the end of his academics, Nobel
was particularly fascinated with English literature and poetry. His father was not pleased by his
interests so he sent him overseas to study chemical engineering. In Paris, France, Nobel met and
worked with Ascanio Sobrero, the chemist who had discovered nitroglycerin [a highly explosive
substance]. Ringertz states that "Alfred Nobel became very interested in nitroglycerin and how it
could be put to practical use in construction work," with this new interest, Nobel took the chance
with the substance and worked with it for years. In his experiments with nitroglycerin, many
explosions occurred including one in 1864 that

Essay on Obama's Nobel Peace Prize
Obama's Nobel Peace Prize It was announced on October 9, 2009 that American President Barack
Obama is this year's recipient of the Nobel Prize for Peace. The Nobel Foundation states that Obama
was chosen "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation
between peoples." (Nobel Foundation) Controversy and debate ensued in the world wide media.
Critics have debated Obama's worthiness. Supporters have cited numerous examples of the current
U.S. Presidents' nobility. Obama does deserve this prestigious award. Nobel prizes are awarded for
Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature, Peace, and Economics. In his will, award
creator Alfred Nobel "specifically designated the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(MacDougall) Other notable past winners include the 2007 winners Al Gore and the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) "for their efforts to build up and disseminate
greater knowledge about man–made climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that
are needed to counteract such change." In 2001 the United Nations and Kofi Annan shared the
award "for their work for a better organized and more peaceful world" and, in 1993 Nelson Mandela
and former South African President Frederik Willem de Klerk were each awarded half of the prize
"for their work for the peaceful termination of the apartheid regime, and for laying the foundations
for a new democratic South Africa" (Nobel Foundation) The question remains "What has the new
President actually done in a mere 10 months in office to put him in the same league as past laureates
such as Nelson Mandela and Mother Teresa?" (Savage) Savage cites four reasons the Nobel
Committee gave to defend their choice. "Obama's focus on strengthening international diplomacy
and supporting the United Nations, his "work for a world without nuclear weapons," his attention to
climate change, and his improvement of human rights. In each area, Obama has made a start."
(Savage) Obama supporters argue that "Beyond mere

The Achievements Of The Nobel Peace Prize
Winning the Nobel Peace Prize is an amazing feat and accomplishments that very few people
receive. Only two US presidents, Theodore Roosevelt, and Barack Obama have received the award.
Roosevelt was the first ever American to win this award. His life story and eventful experiences help
shape him as the person we recognize as an impactful person in history.
Theodore Roosevelt was born on October 27th of 1858 into a Dutch family living in New York. As a
child, he struggled with his asthma. Many of his family members called him "Teddy", a name he
wasn't found of. However, that name latched on until people used his nickname to make a toy many
of us are familiar with, a Teddy Bear. His father, Theodore Roosevelt Sr., knew he was very
intelligent but thought he did not have the body to match. He told him to "make his body" by
exercising, so young Theodore did and became stronger. This led him to gain an interest in wrestling
and weightlifting. When Theodore became a teenager he also became interested in gymnastics and
continued to enjoy sports into his college years and beyond. Roosevelt went to Harvard College and
spent 4 years there. At Harvard, he studied natural science as his major at first, however when his
father died he switched his major to law. He excelled in sports and education and found a good
balance between the two. Roosevelt had an interesting and influential family that helped him be the
person we know starting with his first child. On February 12, 1884,

Nobel Prize Research Paper
Nobel Prize
In this paper I am going to discuss the Nobel Prize. Firstly I will inform you of the history of the
prize, secondly its origin, and how it is awarded today. After that I will discuss the 2010 Nobel Prize
for Medicine, 1901 Nobel Prize for Physics, and the 1930 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.
Alfred Nobel
The Nobel Prize was named after a Swedish inventor and industrialist, Alfred Bernhard Nobel.
Alfred Nobel was born in Stockholm, Sweden on October 21, 1833. He was born into a wealthy
family, although due to the misfortune of losing building materials on sunken barges, Immanuel
Nobel, Alfred's father, was forced into bankruptcy the same year Alfred was born. In 1842 the
family moved to St. Petersburg, Russia. Alfred ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although he started working on IVF in the 1950s it took him about 30 years to make it successful,
and about 60 years until he won the Nobel Prize. Edwards is a professor at the University of
Cambridge England, he also founded Bourn Hall, the first IVF center. Today, vitro fertilization is
responsible for over 4 million births worldwide. Edwards discovered that an embryo can be
fertilized in a Petri dish in a laboratory ((4)
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2010/adv.html). The steps of IVF are started
by prescribing a fertility medication to control the timing of the eggs release. They monitor the
ovaries using ultrasound to make sure the multiple eggs can be collected and that they are
developing the eggs properly and that his is called ovulation induction. To retrieve the eggs a minor
operation is required, sedation and anesthesia is used to prevent discomfort. A hollow needle is
inserted through the pelvic cavity into the ovary to collect the eggs. Now the sperm is needed for
completion of the procedure, this is collected by ejaculation. The process of insemination now
begins; a single sperm is injected into the egg for fertilization. The egg is monitored to make sure
cell division is achieved. It is now considered an embryo after it is fertilized. Three days after the
egg is retrieved from the ovary, and fertilization is achieved then it is inserted into the women's
uterus. The two to four cell embryos is placed

The 1981 Nobel Prize Of Physiology And Medicine
The 1981 Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine
In the year of 1981 three gentlemen were awarded The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
where the prize was divided and then shared amongst the three men. At the time of awarding, the
three gentlemen specialized in the field of neurophysiology while two also specialized in the field of
ocular physiology. One–half of the prize was awarded to Roger W. Sperry for his discoveries
involving the cerebral hemispheres whereas the other half was awarded and split between David H.
Hubel and Torsten N. Wiesel for their findings on the visual system. Therefore, together their
research altered how people originally thought the brain processed information by verifying how the
brain functions and why information is perceived in such a manner. The research conducted by
Roger W. Sperry began in the 1960's and dealt solely with the cerebrum. Before this time, society
only understood the left hemisphere of the brain to be dominant over the right hemisphere. In this
understanding, the cerebrum was composed of two halves, which were referred to as the
hemispheres. The cerebrum consisted of the two hemispheres and millions of nerve fibers that
allowed each hemisphere to distinguish what occurred in the other hemisphere. In the same sense, it
was understood that although both the left and right hemisphere were the same in structure, their
functions differed.
According to The Nobel Assembly at the Karolinska Institute press release, "Sperry has

Rhetorical Analysis Of Malala Yousafzai Nobel Peace Prize...
Malala Yousafzai Nobel Peace Prize Speech Analysis "I am those 66 million girls who are deprived
of education. And today I am not raising my voice, it is the voice of those 66 million girls." Malala
Yousafzai makes this statement in her speech to the Nobel Committee as the first Pakistani and, at
the age of sixteen, the youngest person to receive the Nobel Peace Prize Award. Malala was
unfortunately shot in the head by a member of the Taliban, due to the fact that she defied a culture
that did not allow girls to have an education. Despite her brush with death, she not only recovered,
but became a champion for the rights of children and girls around the world to receive an education.
Malala delivered a speech before the Nobel Committee ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Her use of pathos allows her to connect with the audience on an emotional level and helps drive
home her argument.
Additionally, her use of ethos allows her to present herself to t audience as a reliable figure by
saying, "some people call me the girl who was shot by the Taliban... some people call me a nobel
Laureate now." She convinces the audience of her credibility by reminding them of her personal
experience and that she stands as a credible source. Malala says that the award is not only for her,
but " the Nobel Peace Prize money [will be dedicated] to the Malala Fund", the official organization
led by Malala Yousafzai. She builds on personal examples from her life to support the issue, which
shows that she has first–hand experience with the problem and that she is dedicated to finding a
solution.
Together with strong appeals to pathos and ethos, she establishes the significance of this subject,
persuading the audience to listen to her call to action. She says "Dear sisters and brothers, dear
fellow children, we must work...not wait. Not just the politicians and the world leaders, we all need
to contribute. Me. You. We. It is our duty" (Malala). She reinforces her ideas and provides the
strength and seriousness that the topic deserves, while motivating the audience to unite and face this
issue. Furthermore, she says that

The Importance Of Faulkner's Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance...
What defines a writer and their ability to deliver a message? Is it their level of eloquence? Or is it
the topic that they decided to dedicate their time to writing about? To simply answer, yes and yes.
Being a writer does require all of the above, but it necessitates something more. It requires the
passion and ardor that one has to bring into their writing. In a time of fear and anguish, most might
lose that passion that sparked in them, leaving behind a passionless and hopeless shell. In his Nobel
Peace Prize acceptance speech at the Nobel Banquet, these were the issues William Faulkner had to
address.
Using his platform for something greater, Faulkner delivered his speech, not only to accept his
award but to advise the future ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To the future generations of writers that Faulkner was speaking to, they would fulfill his wishes.
Over 50 years later, University of Chicago economist, Steven D. Levitt, and New York Times
journalist, Stephen J. Dubner, combined their knowledge and skills and created the book,
Freakonomics. The book follows an economist, Levitt, as he explores the "hidden side of
everything" and explains it all in a different, unconventional perspective. It takes on the topic of
morality and economics as he, along with Dubner, ask and answer many questions such as, which is
more dangerous, a gun or a swimming pool? What do schoolteachers and sumo wrestlers have in
common? Or why do drug dealers still live with their moms? As the reader can see, these questions
aren't the usual conventional ones. It takes on an unprecedented view as Levitt and Dubner research
and give a whole new perspective on how the world works.
As they answer these unconventional questions, it show the consideration, thoughtfulness, and
research that Levitt and Dubner went through in order to give the proper answer. Yet not only do
they give the answers but they give a thorough explanation as they navigate the readers through their
entire thinking process, showing the passion and deliberation that they put into making this book.
Consider the question that Levitt and Dubner asked in chapter five, which is more dangerous, a gun
or a swimming pool? Most

Why Carter Center Won The Nobel Peace Prize
Nobel Peace Prize What would you do if your entire nation is being ravaged by a disease that you
don't know how to treat? That's where The Carter Center stepped in to aid struggling families in
Africa. Led by former president Jimmy Carter and his wife, they were able to bring cures to villages
that have none. Some people may say that the Carters just want to gain media attention but I will
prove that is not the case. The purpose of this essay is to show why I believe the Carter Center
should be awarded the "Nobel Peace Prize."
The first reason why The Carter Center should win the Nobel Peace prize is they assist people in
thousands of villages with diseases that don't have a cure in their country. The biggest epidemic that
the Carter Center was involved in was the Guinea worm disease. In just one years' time the Center
reduced the disease by a whopping 99 percent! That number decreased from 3.5 million to less then
11,000. Since the Center has many people to help throughout the world, they teach the people who
are at the center of the disease to cure it themselves. To do this, the Carter Center train volunteers
within the thousands of villages who are the main reason the diseases are cured. However, this not
the only reason the Carter Center should win the "Nobel Peace Prize." ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
To cure Guinea worm they took an extremely low–tech approach. One of the main ways they
stopped the disease was to keep people from drinking contaminated water. They built wells, treated
water to kill fleas, and also filtered water. The simplest way they destroyed the disease was by
handing out pipe filters. Pipe filters are small portable water purification plants that look like a piece
of jewelry. It has a fine screen at the bottom that filters out fleas making any water source safe to
drink. What more could they have done to help those

Martin Luther King Nobel Peace Prize
I hereby nominate the African American civil rights leader, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. to be
awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. King should receive the Nobel Peace Prize mainly because of his
nonviolent resistance of racial prejudice in America. He has emphasized equal rights with his non–
violent protests and has made such a tremendous impact on the world. If he never stood up for what
he believed in we could still be stuck in a time where African–Americans still couldn't use the same
fountains as white people.
Martin Luther King, Jr. was born in Atlanta, Georgia on January 15, 1929; and is the middle child of
Michael King Sr. and Alberta Williams King. Around the age of twelve, he tried jumping out of a
second story window in attempt to kill

Impactful Use Of Figurative Language In Malala's Nobel...
Twenty–six whopping minutes. That's how long Malala Yousafzai's Nobel Prize speech was, and it
was jampacked full of rhetorical devices such as figurative language, repetition, and parallel
structure. You could go and watch it, but you'll get the same content from reading this paper, and it'll
take half of the time. There are many instances of figurative language that can be found within
Malala's speech, but I'm just going to highlight the ones that stuck out to me. One of the most
impactful uses of figurative language that I came across was a metaphor. In order to convey
determination to learn, she referenced her "thirst for education." I thought that this was very
impactful because it compares education to one of the basic necessities of life, water. Another great
use of figurative language within her speech was the use of symbolism. Throughout her speech,
Malala uses herself as a symbol for various issues that she cares about, but it's very evident when
she claims to be other girls that have had to fight for their rights. Malala uses ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Three times she says "so it becomes the last time" when referring to education deprivation. She does
this to ingrain the thought into our brains that if we take a stand, children will no longer have to
worry about education deprivation. As a result, the thought that more and more helpless children
will lose their rights to education if we don't decide to help them will be ingrained in our minds as
well. While talking about the same subject, Malala states that "it is not the time to pity them" twice
to emphasize the point that nothing will happen if we don't take actions to help the children.
Towards the end of her speech, she reveals that her goal is to see "every child in school." Twice
more, she repeats the phrase, "the last time," to show us that if we put all of our effort into achieving
her goal, we will never have to fight for education

Rosalind Franklin and the Nobel Prize
In considering whether or not Rosalind Franklin should have been acknowledged, along with
Watson, Crick, and Wilkins, for the discovery of the double helix and awarded a Nobel Prize, one
must look what qualifies someone to win a Nobel Prize. In order for someone to be awarded the
Nobel Prize they must first meet the qualifications. The qualifications are endless, but somewhat
simple. In this case the Nobel Prize is for science. This prize is chosen by a group of people, and
they seek to choose people whom create different views of topics in the field they are studying. The
main candidate is consistently searching to find new ideas of the concerning topic, that could
enhance the knowledge that people already have on a problem or solution in the world. The Nobel
Committee sends persons who are believed to hold the qualifications of a Nobel Prize a form of
proposal. The candidates are not chosen at random, but are recommended by others who have
excelled in their field of work. The other nominations are not made public, but concealed for a
period of 50 years (NobelPrize.org).
Franklin should be awarded the prize because her work is both philosophical and instrumental.
Although it is hard to determine to what lengths Franklin contributed philosophically to Watson's
double helix discovery, it is apparent that she contributed immensely in the sense of instrumental
work. With out Franklin, Watson would not have the X–ray pictures that support the helical DNA
structure that he is

Alfred Nobel: The Man behind the Prize. Essays
Alfred Nobel: The Man behind the Prize.
Alfred Nobel is known for starting the Nobel Prize. This prize is given every year to some of the
greatest minds in the world who through their work, help to better society. In opposition to the
improvement of society, is the fact that Nobel's other known inventions brought much death and
destruction to the world (Frost). This combination of inventions helps to pose the question who was
Alfred Nobel, and why did Nobel create this prize to help the world. In this paper I will find out who
was the man behind the inventions that brought so much death and destruction to the world. I will
also find out why he created this prize to have people work to better the planet and protect life itself.
Lastly ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Petersburg where he excelled in his studies, especially chemistry (Fant).
As Alfred Nobel grew into a young man he became well traveled, and consequently learned five
different languages fluently (Fant). In his spare time he wrote novels, poetry, and plays (Fant). As
Nobel got older, he started to help in his father's workshop. While working at the workshop Nobel
learned about and became fascinated by nitroglycerin (Frost). Nobel and his father became very
competitive in trying to find out who was better at creating a "massive explosion" (Frost). Young
Nobel finally won the competition with his father by using nitroglycerin to create a larger explosive
device (Frost). Afterwards, Alfred Nobel discovered how to utilize the power contained within the
nitroglycerin compound; however it was still a very volatile substance (Dynamite).
Nobel knew there was a huge potential for such an explosive but he needed to figure out a way to
make it safer. Nobel "worked 16 hours a day" to find out how to harness the power of this unstable
destructive substance (Dynamite). In 1864 a large amount of nitroglycerin exploded accidentally at
the factory where Nobel worked with the dangerous substance (Frost). Nobel's younger brother,
Emil, was killed in the accident. Determined to find a way to make this explosive safer to use, Nobel
returned to work the next day and worked day and night. Nobel never mentioned the accident but
did move his experiment to an offshore barge

Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech
Al Gore's speech titled "Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech" is a powerful work of literature which
serves two purposes. The first purpose is stated in the title – to accept his award of the Nobel Peace
Prize. The second intent he had when writing the speech was to reiterate his points that awarded him
the honor in the first place. The speech explains his passion for the problem in our world that is the
climate change and how much we pollute our earth. To give a short gist of what his cause was, the
following quote offers much insight to the regretful aspect of our society that he is passionate about
fixing. He says "So today, we dumped another 70 million tons of global–warming pollution into the
thin shell of atmosphere surrounding our planet, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His call to actions is for us to "choose between two futures." He goes on to explain further by
challenging the reader to challenge assumption as well as repetition. Challenging us to question the
repetition that would eminently happen if we don't unify and majorly change our actions. His
persuasion is made very strong and hard–hitting when he says "we are standing at the most fateful
fork in that path. So I want to end as I began, with a vision of two futures – each a palpable
possibility – and with a prayer that we will see with vivid clarity the necessity of choosing between
those two futures, and the urgency of making the right choice now." Reading this quote gives the
feeling of being very inspired and feeling empowered. That being said, I feel Gore should have
given more concrete action that he proposes we take. He should have said things such as we should
stop allowing every person to drive a motor vehicle as much as they please. If he'd said something
along those lines, it puts a specific concern in mind and helps along the putting the reality of better,
healthier world into fruition. He also could have proposed that perhaps every person who owns a
vehicle be required to plant a tree once a year. His speech was powerful with lots of drawing of
parallels, a lot of analogies, and many accounts of making associations. While he is lacking a
concrete and specific remedy for our current situation, maybe it is okay. Perhaps all we need is to
see that we do have a choice in how we can influence the world, and the rest is up to us to draw
from the inspiration and coordinate our own, personal next move to attain the goal that has been

Nobel Prize for Cell Signaling Pathways Essay
In 2013, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded to James Rothman, Randy
Schekman, and Thomas Sudhof for their pioneering research in cell signaling pathways. Together,
they were able to solve many questions that we had about how this precise cell–
‐to–
‐ cell regulation
is carried out. With their works, many scientists across the world can apply their discoveries in
various ways.
Due to our profound genomic studies, we have been able to sequence many genomes of various
organisms. With the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There are two processes that are involved in the bulk transport of large molecules. After these large
particles are packaged in vesicles, if the molecules are to be secreted from the cell, the transport
vesicles fuse with the plasma membrane in a process called exocytosis. James Rothman discovered
that "this process is done very precisely as specific protein complexes on the transport vesicles and
specific proteins on the plasma membrane bind together to cause this fusion" (1).
When the cell takes in particles from the outside, the cell sinks inward to form a vesicle of materials
from the outside in the same principle that James Rothman identified.
The plasma membrane plays a key role in cell signaling pathways. Local signaling is when local
regulators are secreted from one cell to trigger nearby

Humorous Wedding Speech: The Nobel Peace Prize
Thank you. Thank you your Majesty, your Royal Highness, Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Thank you for this Nobel Peace Prize, a prize that was well fought for between me and my fellow
laureate, who is beside me today. I am here today, in Oslo, to accept this award, not for myself, but
for the global cause of environmental betterment. I accept this award on behalf of the people who
have fought to keep the earth green, and will continue to do so.
So far this year, 1.9 billion tons of waste have been dumped, 28.43 percent of coral reefs have
disappeared, 11.5 billion hectares of forests have been cut down or burned. 1.1 thousand species
have gone extinct. The year has not ended.
As we speak, mankind is engaged in a race against time ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Any person. I believe that if every one person were to use reusable bags, then the 8.9 million tons of
plastic will go down significantly. I believe that if people only purchased the amount of food they
consumed and did not waste food, then there would not be 6.5 tons of wasted fish.
I believe that people have the power to change, but we must we the one to encourage it, to play the
role of moderator to transition people to use more environmental friendly habits. This means a
global mobilization of peoples and organizations everywhere, working to educate and inform people
on global warming and their part in preventing this disaster.
Conservation is not a movement of the few, but a movement of the entire world population, of the
7.5 billion people that are alive today. I walk around and preach this message of safe consumerism,
but I know that I am only one person that, on the grand scale of the world, I am not much. But
together, all of us have the power to change everything.
Every day, I see people walking out of stores with their own bags, or people at the register declining
plastic bags. I see people who opt to ride bikes, walk, and take public transportation instead of
driving a personal vehicle. On a bigger scale, I see companies pushing for greener practices, aiming
to reduce their waste and use sustainable

Elie Wiesel Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech
In Elie Wiesel's Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, his purpose is to state the obvious, and
frequently ignored, fact that incidences like the Holocaust should never be permitted to happen
again. For instance, during the speech, Wiesel states that he has "...tried to keep the memory alive..."
and "...tried to fight those who would forget." Wiesel is trying to convey to the audience that such
traumatic events, like the Holocaust, should not be forgotten. If such genocides are forgotten, the
people who lost their lives sacrificed themselves for nothing. Also, Wiesel, later on in his speech,
says, "if we forget who the guilty are, we are accomplices." He is expressing the fact that if people
ignore or forget what happened to the innocent victims, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, when Wiesel is thanking the audience for the Nobel Peace Prize he states that, "...this
honor belongs to all the survivors and their children, and through us, to the Jewish people with
whose destiny I have always identified." Wiesel says he can relate to what the Jewish had to go
through during the Holocaust which implies that he has gone through a similar experience himself.
Because of this, he feels biased towards the Jews, or the sufferers, and feels that the tormentors
should not be allowed to make people suffer and have it go ignored by the world. Also, he states,
later on in his speech, that "silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented" (Wiesel). During
the Holocaust, people were aware that the Jews were tortured but did not speak up because they
were afraid of the consequences. Wiesel is communicating to the audience that if someone is aware
of the oppression going on in the world but does not say anything, then they are helping the
tormentors by making them feel it is alright to oppress someone. In conclusion, Elie Wiesel is biased
towards the victims of a traumatic event because he can relate to what they have been

Does Bob Dylan Deserve The 2016 Nobel Prize?
On Thursday, October 13, 2016, Bob Dylan has been awarded the 2016 Nobel Prize in Literature.
Since then, it has been questioned whether or not he deserves this prize. Bob Dylan whose real name
is Robert Allen Zimmerman was raised in Duluth, Minnesota. He has been singing and has been in
bands since he was a teenager and has listened to songs from an even earlier age. He has been given
many awards for his songs and has grown a reputation. However, being awarded the Nobel Prize
had brought up a lot of arguments and questions on if Bob Dylan deserves it. The Nobel Prize was
created by Alfred Nobel who want to prizes to those who have done something incredible in
Physics, Chemistry, Medicine, Literature, Peace, and Economic Sciences. Winners ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Alfred Nobel wants "outstanding" literature from the Literature Prize winner which is stated in his
will, "...one part to the person who shall have produced in the field of literature the most outstanding
work in an ideal direction." Bob Dylan has created many outstanding songs which can be proven by
the awards he had won. Biography states some of the few awards, "The legendary singer–songwriter
has received Grammy, Academy and Golden Globe awards, as well as the Presidential Medal of
Freedom and the Nobel Prize for Literature." These prizes exhibit that Bob Dylan's work must be
very impressive to have won so many awards and it further supports the reason to give him another.
This also brings up the argument that Bob Dylan has too much spotlight and "real" literature writers
deserve. In the article "Why Bob Dylan Shouldn't Have Gotten The Nobel Prize" nytimes.com
states, "The legendary singer–songwriter has received Grammy, Academy and Golden Globe
awards, as well as the Presidential Medal of Freedom and the Nobel Prize for Literature...By
honoring a musical icon, the committee members may have wanted to bring new cultural currency
to the prize and make it feel relevant to a younger generation. But there are many ways they could
have accomplished this while still honoring a writer." This article is expressing that awarding a
writer would be more appropriate for the Nobel Prize and that Dylan has already won plenty of
awards. However, this would be saying that someone who is passionate and elaborate in their work
all time should not be recognized because someone else wants a chance. This is saying that a person
who gets 100 as their grade all the time should not be credit because someone who got a 90 deserves
a chance. In

Thank Bob Dylan With The Nobel Prize
December 20, 2016
Dear Nobel Prize committee,
The Nobel Prize for Literature is an outstanding prize that honors extraordinary people for their
works in literature. It honors people that have changed literature. On October 13, 2016 you awarded
Bob Dylan with the Nobel Prize in Literature. This marks him as the first musician ever to win this
prize. Many people agree with your decision, while others are not delighted with this fact. I agree
with the committee to honoring Bob Dylan with the Nobel Prize in literature "for having created
new poetic expressions within the great American song tradition."
Bob Dylan was born as Robert Allen Zimmerman on May 24, 1941 in Duluth, Minnesota. While
growing up, Bob was influenced by Elvis Presley, Jerry Lee Lewis, and Little Richard. He was also
in a few bands while growing up. While he was in college he began performing folk and country
music at local cafes under the name Bob Dillon. In 1960, he dropped out of college and moved to
New York. In New York, Bob met his idol Woody Guthrie and visited him regularly and became
great friends with him. In 1961, he signed his first recording contract at Columbia Records and
became one of the most original influential voices in the history of American popular music.
Throughout his lifetime he 's been awarded with Grammy's, Academy and Golden Globe awards. In
2012, he received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Barack Obama. Bob Dylan
wrote music based on social issues, war and civil

How Did Takaaki Kajita Got The Nobel Physics Prize
There's the Nobel peace prize, There's the Nobel Chemistry Prize, There's even a Nobel Philosophy
Prize. But there's also a Nobel Physics prize, In 2015 A man named Takaaki Kajita won that prize
with Arthur B. McDonald. Ever since 1901 people have been able to win a Nobel Physics prize and
only 111 people have ever won one! You must be thinking, How did Takaaki Kajita get his hands on
one? Well, it's clearly Not easy he was 55 when he got it! Well In this essay Not only are you gonna
learn just exactly how Takaaki Kajita got the Nobel Physics prize but about his background in the
process to.
Takaaki Kajita was born on March 9th, 1959, in the city of "Higashimatsuyama" Which is located in
Japan. Ever since Takaaki Kajita was a child he'd been ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Each person shares the award with someone else so The award has been given 111 times. Out of the
population of 7.442 billion people in this world, Mr.Kajita won the award with Arthur B. Mcdonald.
Two people surpassed everyone else in physics in 2015! That's crazy, right? He received it for his
discovery of Neutrino oscillation. So He's been awarded Three times for his discovery of Neutrino
Oscillation. Looks like it's a big deal right? So they contribution that Takaaki Kajita made was
discovering that neutrinos weigh something more than nothing. So before 2015 Everyone had
believed they weighed nothing whatsoever, But until Takaaki Kajita and Arthur B. Mcdonald came
along they changed all branches of physics of and science forever. During the award ceremony,
Takaaki Kajita's wife and daughter were there. The Nobel committee said the discovery had
"changed our understanding of the innermost workings of matter and can prove crucial to our view
of the

Faulkner's Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech
Humble
(Critical review on A Rose for Emily and Faulkner's Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech)
In Faulkner's Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech, he talks about how the award was not an award to
him as a man, but an award to his work. Faulkner gives all the credit to his writing career and
earning the Nobel Prize to his writing and not to himself. His speech is a very important part of
history because it is such a humble speech and the things he talks about are very true about him as a
person. In Faulkner's short story, "A Rose for Emily", the humbleness of his speech shows through,
and really shows that he is a wonderful writer and truly deserved the Nobel Prize Award. "A Rose
for Emily" is a short story about a young woman that talks about how sheltered she was because her
father did not believe she needed to get married in order to be happy. Not ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Faulkner was one of the greatest writers of all time and it showed in his writing and that is why he
won the Nobel Prize Award. His speech was very well written and went to show that he knew
exactly what he was talking about when he wrote. Edmond Volpe talks about Faulkner like he was
the first man to walk on the moon; he said that Faulkner was the greatest writers of all time, but
reading his stories took a different type of reading. He says that in order to read Faulkner's work you
need to have a very open mind, and that is something that shows through in "A Rose for Emily."
Faulkner was not the only one to say that. William O'Conner also stated that Faulkner had a
"Tangled Fire of a mind" and it showed through in his work, but it mainly showed through in his
more famous story, "A Rose for Emily". Faulkner was a great writer, and that was obviously the
reason that he won the Nobel Prize, and the reason his speech became one of the most famous
speeches in the writing

Anne Frank Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech
"We're so fortunate here, away from the turmoil. We wouldn't have to give a moment's thought to all
this suffering if it weren't for the fact that we're so worried about those we hold dear, whom we ca n
no longer help. I feel wicked sleeping in a warm bed, while somewhere out there my dearest friends
are dropping from exhaustion or being knocked to the ground." – Anne Frank (11/19/1942)
Conflict has happened, and will continue to happen throughout the centuries we're on this earth.
Countless people have been hunted or persecuted, and left with the responsibility of how to respond
and deal with it. When conflict is described in negative terms, people find it is emotionally
distressing and tend to shy away from things they don't like. Excerpts such as The Diary of Anne
Frank and Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech, exhibit how people react to times of war. During the past
and important times in history, people have hidden from or avoided complications as a ... Show
In the passage called Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech, Elie Wiesel, a survivor of the Auschwitz and
Buchenwald Nazi concentration camps, tells his stories through books he has written about his
experiences. He was awarded the nobel prize for being a "messenger to mankind." During his
acceptance speech, Wiesel discussed reasons why people should not ignore or forget about conflict
like they normally do. He says, "... if we forget, we are guilty, we are accomplices," meaning, if we
do not attempt to help solve the issue, we become part of it. There are so many ways one individual
can make a difference, "a difference of life or death," and most don't even try. Wiesel encourages
people to help others who face oppression, because the quality of our freedom depends on theirs.
His words inspired many people who chose to respond to conflict by ignoring it, to change their
ways and become part of the

Should The Nobel Peace Prize Be Abolished
The Nobel Peace Prize is an award Alfred Nobel made for people who try to make the world better.
Each year a person who tried to make it less polluted or tried to take away one of the many
problems. In 2007, Al Gore was given the prize. The most significant effect is climate change and
global warming of which the people have created.
This is true because as the months come and go, it is getting harder and harder to ignore the fact that
the world is in danger. "In the last few months, it has been harder and harder to misinterpret the
signs that our world is spinning out of kilter" (Nobel Speech p. 15) This is true because with more
and more pollution in the tiny shell of the atmosphere, it is getting harder to ignore that the Earth as
many know it is getting changed in a bad way. This links to the claim because the world spinning
out of kilter is an effect of climate change and global warming.
The claim is true because the human species are ignoring the problems at hand. "We, the human
species, are confronting a planetary emergency–a threat ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"No witchcraft, no enemy action had silenced the rebirth of new life in this stricken world. The
people had done it themselves." (Silent Spring p. 8) This is true because the only reason why people
would say that the pollution is worse, is because you can see how big it is, but climate change is
something you cannot see that still is a humongous challenge. This is false for many more reasons,
but since you can see it people would think it is a bigger problem, when really the climate change is.
Many would say that climate change is the biggest problem which is true, because people have been
ignoring the problem showing how it gets worse over time.In my point of view, if people car pulled,
and rode bikes, and drove in cars less the world would not have nearly as big of problems at

Wilhelm Rontgen and the Nobel Prize Essay
Wilhelm Conrad Rontgen was born on March 27, 1845 in Lennep, Prussia; which is now
Remscheid, Germany. His family moved to Apeldoorn in the Netherlands, where we went to
Institute of Martinus Herman van Doorn, a boarding school. He did not show any special aptitude,
but he had a fascination with nature and loved roaming the countryside and walking through forests.
Later he attended a technical school in Utrecht, but unfortunately was unfairly expelled for allegedly
drawing a rude caricature of one of the teachers, which was in fact drawn by another student. He
then entered the University of Utrecht in 1865 to study physics. He did not have the required
credentials to enter the University, but he heard he could enter by passing an exam. He ... Show
He named this new discovery "X–Ray" because x is the term for an unknown number in
mathematics. It was later called "Roentgen Rays" although changed back to "X–Ray". With his new
discovery, he found that the rays would travel through human tissue, but leave a shadow of bone and
metal behind. One of his first experiments was on his wife Bertha's hand with a ring on her finger in
1895. Medical X–rays work by letting fast moving electrons come to a sudden stop on a metal plate.
They show up different on the radiograph because of different absorption rates of different material.
The calcium in bones absorb the most x–rays so they appear white on a radiograph, or the film x–
rays are displayed on, although other things like tissue, fat and skin absorb it less so they appear
grey. Air absorbs the least x–rays so this is why lungs look completely black on a radiograph.
Todays x–ray machines are much faster, more efficient and produce much less harmful radiation.
Excessive exposure to x–rays can be dangerous but in modern medicine doctors are able to keep us
safe with their knowledge on this. The original x–ray machine took 90 minutes and produced 1500
times the radiation as modern x–rays. Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen has made a huge impact on todays
technology. It's obvious to see that inventing the x–ray is a big deal, but this was actually a very big
accomplishment and made a lot of new things possible. Without the x–ray our ability in the medical
world would be

Henry Kissinger Won The Nobel Peace Prize
Henry Alfred Kissinger was born on May 27, 1923, in Fürth, Germany. From 1949 to 1963 Henry
was married to Ann Fleischer. They got divorced, and Henry remarried Nancy Kissinger. The first
think Kissinger did for a living was a professor at Harvard. Henry Kissinger was Secretary of State
from 1973 to 1977. He later became the Secretary of National Security Diplomat and a political
scientist. He wrote books that were mainly about politics. Kissinger is known to many people as
inhuman because of some of the quotes he has said.
Henry Kissinger co–won the Nobel Peace Prize mainly because of his actions during the Vietnam
war. He made peace between Vietnam and the U.S.A, but not everyone agreed with his actions.
After he won the prize, people started

Dr King's Nobel Prize Speech Inspires Student

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Evelyn Donaldson

More from Evelyn Donaldson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Dr King's Nobel Prize Speech Inspires Student