Essay Science

Ethics in Science Essay
What do you think of when you hear or see the word "science"; test tubes, Einstein, Space?
Science is "generally taken as meaning either (a) the exact sciences, such as chemistry, physics,
etc., or (b) a method of thought which obtains verifiable results by reasoning logically from
observed fact" (Orwell). Scientists are those who study science by scientific method. These "men of
science", which Orwell describes as "a biologist, and astronomer, perhaps a psychologist or a
mathematician", "work by means of induction and deduction, and that by the help of these
operations, they, in a sort of sense, wring from Nature certain other things, which are called natural
laws, and causes, and that out of these, by some cunning skill of their own,...show more content...
This undoubtedly demonstrations the pros and cons of inventions made through science. There
are people who abuse medicine, and other creations from science, for numerous different reasons.
Things like guns and nuclear weapons were formed to protect, but with the downside of killing
others. With all of this this being said, should there be a limit to things we make? More
importantly, does science have an ethical responsibility to humanity? I think to answer that
question, we need to start with deciding if scientists have an ethical responsibility to humanity. As
the saying goes, with knowledge comes power and with power comes responsibility. However,
there can be no limitation on the knowledge obtained from science. Instead, we must limit what
arises from knowledge and power. What are some responsibilities of scientists and the rest of the
population? Well, to start on the broadest sense, science should only be used for the absolute
necessary improvement of humanity. It is our ethical responsibility to not take advantage of
science to further the advancement of military power, as we have done with the creation of atomic
and nuclear bombs. Is it responsible to use science for fame, fortune and glory? No, and it is not
acceptable, but it is common for people to do so. If, for some reason, we had the option to save 80%
of endangered wildlife through scientific means, but with the consequence of harming the
atmosphere, would it be ethical to continue on? We would have
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Environmental Science Essay
Environmental Fundamentals
Laura Jackson
Env/100
April 8, 2013
JOHN ENSWORTH
Environmental Fundamentals
Introduction
Environmental science is defined as the study of the environment and the interconnecting systems it
contains, furthermore, the way people interact with their natural surroundings and use natural
resources (wise geek, 2013). Scientist in this field is highly interdisciplinary and extremely diverse,
for example, a scientist might study volcanoes or climate change. This essay will cover the
following; the definition of environmental science, the relationship between science and technology
and how it affects environmental problems; the concept of environmental sustainability and why it
should be studied; how human...show more content...
Environmental Sustainability
Environmental sustainability is the process of making sure current processes of interaction with the
environment are pursued with the idea of keeping the environment as pristine as naturally possible
based on ideal–seeking behavior (Wikipedia, 2010). What makes environmental sustainability so
important is that it demands that society designs activities to meet human needs while indefinitely
preserving the life support systems of the planet (Wikipedia, 2010). Human consumption can only
use the nature's resources at a rate that can be replenished naturally.
Human Values affecting Society
The most devastating environmental change of all is the loss of biodiversity. The rate of species
extinction has remained at one species per million per year, furthermore, the accelerating destruction
of habitats throughout the world leads to projections of the loss of two–thirds of all species on earth
by the end of this century, and millions of years to recover from the Cretaceous period
(mindfully.org, 2013). As individuals, we obtain our food, directly or indirectly from plants, for
example, plant our primary use of medicines. Biodiversity also determines the properties of
communities and ecosystems, which capture energy from the sun. The world is less resilient, more
homogeneous, less interesting, and with fewer opportunities for our descendants and ourselves:
where the process reaches

Science and Religion Essays
Science and religion have always been in conflict with one another because they each represent
complete opposite ideals, science is about how nature controls how the universe works and religion
is about how God controls how the universe works. In the five models on science and religion I
believe that Conflict best describes the relationship between the two. Conflict tells how either
science is completely right and religion is wrong or the other way around and that religion and
science are completely different. It also tells on how many scientists are religious and may be
inspired be many religious ideals but on the other side is that if God created the universe he also
created the rules that go with it....show more content...
I'm my opinion since God is the creator of the universe and all life then he is the creator of
science as well. There are four other models that explain the relationship between science and
religion but in my opinion they do not explain the relationship between the two. Independence
tells how the two are complete opposites which is true but it also says that religion seeks to
explain experiences of inner life which I don't believe to be true. Religion does try to explain
experiences of inner life but it's much more than just that, religion tries to explain how and why
were created, how God created the world, and what purpose do serve on this earth. Complimentary
tells how science and religion benefit each other and that information from one enriches the other. I
don't think this model fits at all because I believe that the two are completely different and do not
enrich or fulfill one another. I believe that in the world there opposites to everything, good and evil,
white and black and science and religion. The only way science and religion compliment the other is
to be the opposite of the other.
Integration is the model that tells how science

Essay on Science in Society
Science in Society
Within the last century scientific discovery has been growing at an exponential rate. Evolution,
genetics, physics, and chemistry have all greatly affected the way people view the universe and
human role in it. Furthermore, the application of scientific discoveries has physically changed
society. For example, humans went from being flightless to eighty years later having transportation
in super sonic jets available. Rapid scientific change has caused many issues surrounding morality
and science to arise. The idea behind the skepticism is that just because something can be done
doesnt mean it should be. Nuclear weapons, biological weapons, and cloning have all fallen under
fire due to this concept. People worry that...show more content...
Other phrases throughout the first four pages use words like "nightmare", "destroy", "haunt", and
"anguish" to attract readers to how seriously society takes awareness of science. These phrases get
readers to feel the urgency of the views against science in society. The dark phrasing successfully
shows that society has taken a responsible view against incorrect scientific application.
In about the fifth page of the essay, Dyson switches to using positive words to get readers to
believe his true stories of success in stopping immoral science application. He uses words like
"credit", "peace", and "finest hour", giving readers a positive feel. This positive feel is reflected
into the reader's opinion about the odds of correcting science. The positive words influence readers
to believe success against biological weapons, nuclear weapons, and other problems are easy
obstacles.
Dyson's also convinces readers society is successful in stopping science by using words that show
he is reputable as a writer. Dyson writes about a wide variety of events and novels and describes
things with a wide range of scientific words. Dyson does this to show that he is a reliable source. He
uses terms like Citizens Committee, Public Health Authorities, Arms Control and Disarmament
Agency, and many more convincingly complicated words to showing his

Science Essay
For some people science is the supreme form of all knowledge. Is this view reasonable or does it
involve a misunderstanding of science or of knowledge?
For many persons science is considered the supreme form of all knowledge, as science is based on
facts and theories and it reaches its results through an approved scientific method. Consequently, it
seems to be objective and thus more truthful and reliable. However, other persons argue that this is a
misunderstanding of science. Hence, one should question what science and knowledge entail. Can
there actually be some form of knowledge that overrules all other types of human knowledge? Is
scientific knowledge actually always objective? Are there other types of knowledge of equal worth?
This...show more content...
Thus, perception, in this case could be considered an important factor that makes a piece of
knowledge supreme. One could then deduce that frogs have these organs and that most
multi–cellular animals also have these organs, after having looked and compared a large sample.
This is where reasoning, as a way of knowing, comes into use to make generalisations. And one can
be quite sure that this fact is true since it has been seen, and at any moment in time, if someone
dissects a frog, he/she will see these organs. In this example, there is very little room for human
emotions/ bias to affect the perception, since one cannot argue that what's inside the frog's body is
something other than its organs.
On the other hand, there are other parts in the field of biology that are less supreme. Consider the
example of a field study where a scientist is to investigate if leaves closer to the trunk of oak trees
in Scania are larger than those being further away from the trunk. The biologist will make a plan
on how to conduct the experiment, and since he cannot measure all leaves in all trees existing in
Scania, the biologist will have to carry out the field study on a sample, which raises the question:
what could be an appropriate sample? Most scientists agree that the best way to conduct a field
study is being as random as possible. But how does one go about being random? Scientist may have
different ways of reasoning on what would make an appropriate sample, but no way

Science
Science: A Blessing Or A Curse
Everything in the universe has its uses and abuses. The same applies to science. Science has
revolutionized human existence and has made it happier and more comfortable. Modern science has
many wonders. Electricity is one of its greatest wonders. It is a source of energy. It can run any type
of machinery. With the help of electricity, we can light our rooms, run buses and trains and
machinery, lift water for irrigation and can accomplish a multitude of other tasks.
Much of the progress that mankind has made in different fields right from the stone age to the
modern age is due to the progress made in the filed of science. Not only material progress but also
the mental outlook of man has been influenced by...show more content...
Biotechnology is a great boon for fighting the diseases. But along with medicines, lethal biological
weapons have also been developed. Germs are deliberately released into the air to spread diseases.
Anthrax envelopes are used for spreading terrorism. The negative effects of the excessive use of
fertilizers and pesticides, used to increase yield, are now evident. Soil salinity has increased. Traces
of DDT are found in plants. Establishment and expansion of factories has resulted in all–round
pollution. Motor vehicles emit a lot of poisonous material into the atmosphere. This has led to the
depletion of the ozone layer and global warming. Television, a good source of entertainment,
education and information, has its negative effects too. There are many programmes which
promote violence and vulgarity, and teenagers are more interested in watching these programmes.
Aggressiveness and violence at an early age have led to shocking crimes. Sometimes, even the
mature people learn and apply ingenious methods of crime by watching serials and moves. The
power of the Internet is being abused by the widespread use of pornographic material. Lots of
people spend their time in chat rooms for obscene discussion.
Science has two faces–good and bad. It depends on us which face we want to see. If we use the gifts
of science in a positive way, then it will, provide us with sweet results, but if we use it in the wrong
way, the results will definitely be

Value of Science Essay
3/14/2013
Values
Science is undoubtedly a very important part of growing as the human race. It has improved our
lives drastically from the first stone tools, to iPods and cars we drive. But what is it really that
matters when it comes to science? Material things are not the only things that science gives
humanity. Richard Feynman explains his point of view of the values of science, and on how
science is used to create things beneficial and afflicting, how the values behind science are affected
by society, and how science affects people. The very first point brought up ismorality. Science is not
morally oriented to do good or bad and can easily do either. Feynman referenced a Buddhist proverb
he heard while visiting Honolulu, "To...show more content...
For example, recently we had a large hoopla about stem cell research because of the supposed
"farming babies". When in reality, the stem cells were in vitro fertilized eggs from artificially
inseminated parents that would have been thrown away. Those extra fertilized eggs contained cells
that have the capability of creating any cell in the human body, and with the future possibility of
growing replacement/repair body parts of patients; it would have been a huge leap in the medical
field. But because of our own ignorance to the science behind it, we effectively closed the continuum
of scientific progress. Feynman wrote a small poetic section putting into perspective how great and
complicated humans are, but showing how miniscule they are compared to the universe. Also, how
it is a "religious experience" to have you put into perspective through science itself. He says that
artists and singers won't sing about it because not everyone can understand the science, but the
scientists who can explain it.
The last value of science is the methodology behind being a scientist. Feynman explains how all
scientists have lots of experience with "ignorance and doubt" and after time, effort, testing and
further degrees of uncertainty, subjects can still are unsure, with doubt, and uncertainty. Logic, data,
critical thinking and reasoning can only be as important of understanding. The understanding of the
numerous struggles within science has been

Scientific Theory Essay
Scientific Theory
A scientific theory is a well–substantiated explanation of some aspects of the natural world, based on
a body of knowledge that has been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment.
Scientist creates scientific theories from hypothesis that have been corroborated through the
scientific method, then gather evidence to test their accuracy. The strength of a scientific theory is
related to the diversity of phenomena it can explain, which is measured by its ability to make
falsifiable predictions with respect to the phenomena. Scientific theories are the most reliable,
rigorous, and comprehensive for of scientific knowledge.
The scientific method involves the proposal and testing of hypotheses, by deriving...show more
content...
Theories are the main goal in science and no explanation can achieve a higher rank. (to the belief
that "theories" become "laws" over time). In some cases, theories can unify. Two or more theories
can be replaces by a single theory which explains the previous theories as approximations or
special cases, comparable to the way a theorys is connecting explanation for many confirmed
hypotheses: This is reffered to as Unification of Theories. Both scientific laws and scientific theories
are produced from scientific methods through the formation and testing of hypotheses, and can
predict the behavior of the natural world. Both are typically supported by observation and
experimental science. However, scientific laws are descriptive accounts of how nature will behave
under certain conditions. Scientific theories are broader in scope, and give overarching explanations
of how nature works and why it exhibits certain characteristics. They are supported by evidence from
many different sources, and may contain one or more laws.
Both scientific laws and scientific theories come from the scientific method through the formation
and testing of hypotheses, and can predict the behavior of the natural world. Both are usually well
supported by observations and/or experimental evidence. However laws are descriptive accounts of
how nature will behave under certain conditions. Assumption is a

Essay Science

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Best Paper Writing Services

More from Best Paper Writing Services (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay Science