![BRAC & the APG Community ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to Residual Effects of BRAC
Similar to Residual Effects of BRAC (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Residual Effects of BRAC
- 1. “ BRAC Implementation: A Regional Effort” Karen L. Holt, BRAC Manager APG-CSSC Regional BRAC Office Association of Builders & Contractors, Baltimore Region February 25, 2009
- 6. Aberdeen Proving Ground Proximity to Mid-Atlantic Region APG, MD 674 Atlanta, GA 486 Charlotte, NC 372 Boston, MA 167 Richmond, VA 164 New York, NY 75 Philadelphia, PA 61 Washington, DC 23 Baltimore, MD Miles
- 12. APG BRAC Impacts to the Region Mid Case Scenario Sage Policy Group, September 2007 2% 5% 2% 5% 12% 31% 42% 10,927 Public School Population 2% 5% 2% 5% 12% 31% 42% 45,042 Population 2% 5% 2% 5% 12% 31% 42% 16,682 Households 1% 2% 1% 3% 5% 18% 70% 27,620 Employment Lancaster York New Castle Balt. City Cecil Baltimore Harford TOTAL
- 14. Current APG Personnel Distribution Aberdeen Proving Ground 0.10% New Jersey 1.30% Other States inc D.C. 1.90% Delaware 2.10% Virginia 2.90% Other Maryland 4.70% Pennsylvania 8.60% Baltimore 12.90% Cecil County 62.50% Harford County APG Personnel Distribution
- 24. “ BRAC Implementation: A Regional Effort” Karen L. Holt, BRAC Manager APG-CSSC Regional BRAC Office 410-273-5708 [email_address] www.apg-cssc.com
Editor's Notes
- KAREN: Good afternoon...(introduce panel). Our panel today will brief you on regional BRAC efforts for implementation, discuss some specific timelines and projects related to Cecil’s involvement and highlight some activities Cecil has initiated or participated in anticipation of BRAC.