Guerilla Warfare Essay

Guerilla Warfare Essay
Guerrilla Warfare
The term guerrilla (Spanish, "little war") originated in the early 19th century during the Peninsular war when, after the defeat of Spain's regular forces,
Spanish irregulars and civilians rose up against the French occupying forces. The practice of guerrilla warfare, however, dates from antiquity; for
example, the Bible tells of the Israelite conquest of Canaan, led by Joshua, involving harassment and ambush of the enemy. Later Jewish resistance to
foreign rule was expressed in the series of fierce guerrilla operations against the Romans in the 1st century AD; led by the Zealot sect, this revolt was
climaxed by the seizure of Masada and the massacre of the Roman garrison there in AD66.
Lacking the numerical strength ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Guerrilla warfare has figured prominently in the history of North and South America, from the slave revolts against the Portuguese and Dutch in Brazil
in the 17th century to the ranger raids behind Union lines led by the Confederate solider John Singleton Mosby during the American Civil War. In early
19th century Latin America, guerrilla actions such as those led by the South American patriot Simon Bolivar and the Mexican revolutionary Miguel
Hidalgo Costilla were instrumental in throwing off the Spanish yoke.
In its most general sense, guerrilla tactics involves the combination of methods used to carry out any action. Urban guerrillas wage guerrilla warfare
and psychological warfare. There are five major components to guerrilla tactics: a.The specific nature of the situation; b.Designing the action to meet
the specific nature of the situation; c.The objective; d.The type of action designed to meet the objective; and, e.The method for carrying out that action.
Urban guerrilla tactics embody the following features: (this is how one man refers to guerilla warfare in his country)a.They are aggressive and
offensive in nature. Defense means death for us. Since our firepower, resources, and manpower cannot match that of the enemy, we cannot defend
ourselves against an offensive or a coordinated attack made by the "guerrillas." So our tactics must vary, and can never be permanent, and
that is
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

People's War Legitimacy
Legitimacy: The American Revolution and the People's War
The Marine Corp's doctrinal publication Insurgencies and Countering Insurgencies has over 60 references to legitimacy and describes irregular
warfare, of which a People's War would constitute, as "a violent struggle between state and non–state actors for legitimacy and influence over the
relevant population." While there are many aspect of the American Revolution that can be analyzed as to their importance to victory, none are as
important as the struggle for legitimacy. Legitimacy is at the heart of a revolution and is the key to victory. By categorizing the American Revolution
as a People's War, we can utilize the three phases, as proposed by Mao Tse–Tung, to discern importance ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This bridge is where the irregular forces, for this essay the militia, build space for a conventional force to be fielded and provide momentum for the
movement. One of the first scenes of the traditional guerrilla attack came after the opening shots in Lexington and subsequent march to Concord.
Once word spread, the militia was called out and took to the hills and trees and harassed the British all the way back to Lexington resulting in 273
British casualties. When the British fired on the militia in Lexington, they showed that they were not legitimate and galvanized the support of the local
populace resulting in a "moral victory for the insurgents." Militia service was viewed as a requirement for all patriots and served as an extra–legal
military arm of the larger political struggle for legitimacy. If an individual failed to turn out for muster he would suffer the consequences of a mob or
militia visit that served to "sway" them to the revolutionary view. In John Shy's words "the mechanism of their political conversion was the militia."
While the militia was continuing small attacks and harassing the British Army and posts, George Washington and the Continental Army were fighting a
more conventional battle and standing up a regular

The Characteristics Of Military Warfare During The...
Due to the lack of better tactics, 4,435 soldiers were killed from battle wounds during the American Revolution. The most common tactic during the
American Revolution was line infantry, which was no longer a viable tactic to use in future battles due to many deaths, and how it ultimately let the
larger army be victorious. This lead to new tactics specifically trench warfare which was first used during the American Revolution and has now
become the most used tactic in war, especially during the world wars. There was another form of fighting called guerrilla warfare which was important
for the colonists to defeat the British because they knew the area much better than the British and could get the upper hand. These military tactics
used by the colonists in the American Revolution laid down the foundation for advancement in tactical warfare. Line infantry helped at the time due
to the weapons used then, but in modern combat, the tactic has become obsolete. During the American Revolution, weapons were not reliable or
advanced enough to be used in quick combat where targets could be moving. The first firearm to be used in the American Revolution was the
Brown Bess musket and weighed around 10.5 pounds, and was most effective within 50 yards, but could be used by a skilled musketeer up to 175
yards. It took a long amount of time for the musketeer to reload the weapon if once it was fired. A rifleman could shoot up to 2–5 rounds per minute,
leaving them vulnerable to rush attacks.

On Guerrilla Warfare Sparknotes
In 1937, Mao Tse Tung wrote the book, "On Guerrilla Warfare," as a rational appeal for survival. Mao wrote the piece with the Chinese military in
mind as his audience. During this time, the Chinese military was preparing for the Second Sino–Japanese War. Mao accessed the challenges facing
China in a possible war was their military logistics and strategy. The dynamics and logistics of the Chinese military versus the Japanese army were
incomparable. Mao recognized the Chinese army as smaller in size and weaker in defense. Mao concluded China is incapable of defeating the Japanese
army using conventional military tactics. The Book, On Guerrilla Warfare, is a written proposal of Mao's solution to the impending Japanese conflict.
China's only ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By explaining the history of guerrilla warfare, he rationalized the strategy is not unique to the Chinese military. The tactics of guerrilla warfare
ensure the survival of the oppressed people. He referenced previous leaders that used guerrilla strategies. "Guerrilla strategy is the only strategy
possible for the oppressed people" (55). Mao identified Japan as an oppressive regime, and the people of China will be oppressed by Japan after the
war. Mao's appeal to the rational usage of guerrilla tactics was an effort to remove the negative connotations. As an effort to dismiss the negative bias,
Mao examines the historical battles that used guerrilla tactics. He exampled the war efforts of Napoleon and Russian Soviets. Mao explained Russia
as weak and ill–prepared against the great army of Napoleon. Mao presented the example to intimate China is much like the Russian Soviets. Mao
defined guerrilla warfare as, "a powerful special weapon with which we resist the Japanese and without which we cannot defeat them" (50). Thus, the
guerrilla strategy will ensure the survival of the Chinese against

Vietnam War Military Tactics Essay
The Vietnam War– Tactics
Various military tactics were by both sides of the Vietnam War, the belligerents used military strategies based primarily around getting a geographical
or strategic advantage, such as Booby traps, the Ho Chi Minh Trail and Agent Orange.
Booby Traps
Booby Traps were a form of anti–personnel device (APD) utilised by the North Vietnamese militia, the Viet Cong against South Vietnamese
–allied
forces. Traps such as whip traps, punji sticks (pits containing spears that were hidden with sticks and leaves.
Tunnel System
The Chu Chi tunnels are an intricate network of interconnecting underground tunnels located in the proximity of Saigon, South Vietnam (later renamed
as 'Ho Chi Minh City'). The tunnels proved a key advantage during various military campaigns during the war, and served as the Viet Cong's base of
operations for the Tet Offensive in 1968.
They were used by Viet Cong soldiers as hiding spots during combat, as well as providing a safe logistical link for communication, supply routes,
hospitals, food and weapon caches and also served as ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Agent Orange, which contained the chemical dioxin, was the most effective herbicide available to US forces. It was later revealed to cause substantial
health issues, including but not limited to: tumours, birth defects, rashes, psychological symptoms and cancer among returning war veterans and the
families as well as the general Vietnamese population. This program has had intergenerational consequences on the Vietnamese population, such as
the death or maiming of 400,000 Vietnamese civilians as a result of the conflict, 500,000 children born with serious, disabling birth defects (eg. The
absence of eyes or limbs) as well as up to 2,000,000 people being diagnosed with cancer or other life–threatening diseases as a result of Agent

Effect Of Tung On Guerrilla Warfare
Tung on Guerrilla Warfare). In both wars the guerrilla fighters established their base away from the cities where they knew the terrain and had the
support of the people. The Vietnamese, Viet Cong and Vietminh saw the Americans as neo
–colonialist or imperialists occupying their country,
relocating them from their ancestral land as the French and Japanese had done before, (www.historynet.com/vietnam war). They were defending
someone who was corrupt and against the will of the people who wanted a united Vietnam. Ho Chi Minh started phase one of Mao's Guerilla Warfare
as a counter resistance to Diem policies, by organizing fighters, support bases and soliciting support from the peasants. The British Soldier's presence
in the colonies were

Modern History : The Vietnam War
Modern History
Background:
The Vietnam War began, because of Indochina (Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia) being conquered by the Japanese, in 1941. This led to the creation of
the Vietnamese nationalist movement, formed by Ho Chi Minh to resist the Japanese. The Vietnamese national movement also known as the Vietminh,
was a communist front organization. To stop the spread of communism through Asia, the United States intervened. The war lasted for 19–20 years, and
involved countries such as South Vietnam, North Vietnam, United States, South Korea, Australia, Philippines, New Zealand, Thailand, Khmer
Republic, Laos and the Republic of China. The war was known as a guerrilla war, which meant the use of tactics such as ambush, sabotage and petty
warfare. Guerrilla warfare is a very unconventional style of warfare. It is when small groups of soldiers use stealthy tactics to inflict damage on the
target. The casualties suffered by both sides were immense however, the Communists had the upper hand throughout the majority of the war. Not
only was it their home turf, they also had the support of a large percentage of the civilian population. The effective use of guerrilla tactics by the Viet
Cong played a very important role on the outcome of the war, and is also the primary reason why the United States lost. The following essay will
outline the reasons why the guerrilla tactics used by the Viet Cong played a very important role on the outcome of the Vietnam War. The first
paragraph will

The Importance Of Guerrilla Warfare In The Revolutionary War
Guerrilla Warfare led to the Success of the Revolutionary war
A sneaky, stealthy war tactic called Guerilla Warfare won the American Revolutionary War for the Patriots. Guerrilla warfare is a tactic that was
practiced a lot in the revolutionary war and was without a doubt one of the few reasons the Patriots defeated the British. Guerrilla warfare helped the
colonists win the Revolutionary war. This tactic was used successfully used in the Battle of Trenton, the Battle of Lexington and Concord, and was
widely practiced by Francis Marion in the south.
Guerrilla warfare is a tactic that does not involve head on head warfare. It is a tactic where the side using it will hide within their surroundings. For
example, the Patriots in the Revolutionary War used all of their surroundings to their advantage like trees, rocks, houses, and walls.
Guerrilla warfare was a big part in winning many battles in the Revolutionary war. One of biggest wins using this tactic was the Battle of Trenton. The
Battle of Trenton was fought December 26, 1776 in Trenton, New Jersey. GeneralGeorge Washingtondecided to take the Hessians by surprise. The
Hessians were approximately 30,000 German soldiers that Great Britain hired to help them win the war and about 1,400 were in Trenton. General
George Washington took his soldiers and crossed the Delaware river at the stroke of midnight. They were going to attack the Hessians while they were
all sleeping. Most people think that the
Antreassian 2
Patriots

Characteristics Of Guerrilla Warfare
Guerilla Warfare: A Case in Vietnam War
Introduction During the Napoleonic Wars, the term "Guerrilla Warfare" emerged as the main phenomenon that lead the interest of various thinkers
such as Clausewitz, Marx and Engels to examine its importance in war. 'Guerrilla' means "little war", which explain a type of warfare, fought by
irregulars in a fast–paced, small scale actions against military groups and police forces. The word "guerrilla" came from "guerrilleros" which referred
to Spanish and Portugese irregulars that successfully pushed back French army during the Peninsular War in 1808–1814. The practitioners of guerrilla
warfare have been called rebels, insurgents and mercenaries due to the nature of "hide and seek" tactics, which designed ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
"Denying" their victory is accomplished by hit–and–run operations, "hide and seek" technique, and surprise attacks. It is important to attack the
opponent's vulnerable spots with coordination and retreat, causing the enemy's distress and frustration. In aforementioned case study on Vietnam War,
guerrila tactics was shown effectively pushed back US troops despite limited military equipment and technology, in contrast with US advanced
technology for airstrikes and ancillary.
This essay has shown how intelligence and ambush are crucial in determining successful guerrilla tactics. Deception was used in a form of disguise.
The Vietcong who posed as farmers in the countryside worked the fields during the day. They held no suspicion from the US patrols and were not
considered as a threat. The US troops was driven to frustration over identifying enemy and alliance. Another example comes from the complex
underground tunnel. The tunnel provide shelter and mobilization for the Vietcong. Because of this, the Vietcong was able to operate surprise attacks
successfully. The importance of two characteristics cannot be dismissed, as they provide crucial plans in winning the

What Were The Causes And Effects Of The South African War
The South African war was fought between the Boers and the British, from October 12 1899 to May 31 1902. At the time South Africa was a British
colony and the Boer's hostility towards them grew as the British started to push the Boers towards a less fertile area of land. At first it was minor
fighting and conflict but soon thereafter it evolved into a full–scale war. The Boers were tremendously outnumbered and the British had a clear
advantage with numbers and power, however, the British were seen to be overconfident and underestimating the Boers. TheBoer's failure to surrender
to the British lead to the British introducing the death camps, playing on the morale of the Boers, and in turn the hardships of their people lead to the
Boer's surrender. After the horrific war it gave opportunity to the Boers to unite, which they did and the birth of Afrikaans nationalism.
The Boers were well prepared and struck the British hard, winning a few important battles during early stages of the war. The British brought in large
numbers of soldiers and fought back, by 1900 the country had been annexed and the war considered over, however the Boers refused to surrender and
started using guerrilla warfare (Source B). The Boers fought on for two years in this way, until surrendering when too many of their ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Wives and children of those fighting in the war, as well as those too old to fight were forced into the concentration camps. Conditions were
unbearable, women and children were malnourished and multiple diseases broke out in the camps, thousands died (Sources F and G). Death of
friends and family played on the Boers feelings, many of the Boers felt surrender was necessary to bring an end to the deaths. The Boers were fighting
with guerrilla tactics for two years and refused to surrender, the introduction of the concentration camps was the only way the British had to defeat them
and eventually resulting in the Boer's

The Communist Manifesto And The Revolution
Part B #2: The Communist Manifesto and the Revolution
A revolution generally thought of as a change from the norm. According to Christopher Hill the definition of a revolution is "a complete over throw of
the established government in any country or state by those who have been previously subjected to it". Another way to think about a revolution is as an
uprising caused by a group of individuals towards another group due to unfair conditions or treatment. The Communism Manifesto, written by Karl
Marx, was a document written for the general public that described communism and promoted the oppressed individuals to change societal social class.
I will argue that the Communism Manifesto was a document that was meant to start a revolution. In society the oppressors, the bourgeoisie, had
complete control over the government, working condition, as well as the lives of the oppressed middle and lower class, the proletariats. If the
proletariats wanted to see a change in the inequality caused by the class system and regain power then it is the essential that the proletariats overthrow
the existing power. According to the Manifesto "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggle, in other words class conflict
has occurred throughout history, and will continue to occur. A revolution will lead history towards its final destination.
The proletariats are the group of people, according to the Communist Manifesto, that will eventually over throw the

Guerrilla Warfare Vs Vietcong
Prior to the start of Second Indochina war, the United States had been teaching the South Vietnamese armies tactics in order to defeat the North
Vietnamese guerillas. They would use these military tactics while executing search and destroy missions as well as clear and hold missions. Search
and Destroy mission would involve South Vietnamese troops along with United States troops covertly entering into a Vietnamese village, searching for
the Vietcong. Once they found the suspected Vietcong, they would "destroy" them then retreat back to base. The clear and hold method was very
similar except they would drive the enemy forces from the village then occupy it afterward. Both of these tactics were a part of an overall campaign
named Strategic Hamlet.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Vietcong became experts in this type of warfare know as guerrilla warfare. Guerrilla warfare was termed coined during the Peninsular War by
the Duke of Wellington but become popular with the rise of Communism and Marxism which called for the proletariat (lower class) to rise up
against the bourgeoisie (upper class). Since lower class peasants could not stand a chance against conventional armies with tanks, helicopters,
planes and artillery; they were forced to use cheap but effective tactics to kill the enemy. This type of irregular fighting is used against orthodox,
conventional type opponents and the Vietnam war proved the effectiveness of guerrilla warfare. One guerrilla warfare tactic that proved to be
highly effective for the Vietcong was using booby traps in order to kill or wound the enemy without being nearby for retaliation. The Vietcong
would conceal hardened bamboo sticks smothered in poison known as Punji Sticks, underneath a weak platform covered in sticks and leaves, that
would give out if stepped on. Once stepped on, the platform would give out and a US soldier would fall into the Punji sticks which would pierce
his body. Other traps included land mines that would blow up once stepped on and tripwire grenades that would blow up once a soldier stepped on
the wire. Overall these boobytraps accounted for 11% of US casualties in the Vietnam war. Beyond traps, the Vietcong would use other guerilla
warfare tactics such as the hit and run strategy. During a hit and run the Vietcong would attack US forces by ambushing them then exiting before
artillery or air support could be called in by predetermined routes. The Vietcong also used a strategy called the shoot and scoot strategy which involved
the Vietcong attacking US military bases with artillery or mortars then moving the equipment to a new location before the US can

How Effective Were the Guerrilla Tactics of the Viet Cong
How effective were the guerrilla tactics of the Viet Cong– History
Plan * What tactics the Viet Cong used against US/ARVN troops. * How the Viet Cong dealt with the decisions made by the US troops. * How
guerrilla tactics were better than those used by the US troops. * How the environment in Vietnam suited theViet Cong and how it was a disadvantage
for the US troops. * How the surroundings in Vietnam were an advantage to the Viet Cong.
The Viet Cong had many tactics which they used against the US and ARVN troops in the Vietnam War, however these tactics were not those that you
would expect to be used in a war.
The Viet Cong were a Guerrilla army, meaning that the people fighting for them are not proper soldiers. As... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Viet Cong also thought of backup tactics. These included secure sanctuaries for times when the war might go badly. These were very effective as
when the US troops outnumbered the Viet Cong they could retreat to a hiding spot to then launch an ambush. (http://www.pbs.org/battlefieldvietnam
/guerrilla/index.html)
Also the Viet Cong were made up of people from all aroundSouth Vietnam. This made it easier for the Viet Cong to gain trust from people as many of
the South Vietnamese people knew at least one person fighting for the Viet Cong. (Edexcel GCSE, History Controlled Assessment, CA5 Vietnam
1960–75). They were also nice to the South Vietnamese people unlike the US troops. With this advantage the Viet Cong used the South Vietnamese
people as intelligence spies, to gather information about the enemy US troops without them suspecting a thing. This worked well for the Viet Cong as
the US troops wouldn't be able to recognise any Vietnamese people who were working for the Viet Cong, which meant that the Viet Cong could keep
on finding out crucial information about the enemy without needing to capture any opposition fighters.
In conclusion, I believe that the guerrilla tactics of the Viet Cong were much superior to those of the US troops as they were more adapted to the
Vietnamese environment whereas the US tactics could not be put fully into action, and the fact that the Viet Cong knew their environment more
compared to the US was a dominant

War At The Best, Is Horrible, And This War Of Ours
David Leathers Professor Blanc US History 13 November 2014 Civil Warfare "War at the best, is terrible, and this war of ours, in its magnitude and
in its duration, is one of the most terrible" (Lincoln). This "war of ours" is the American Civil War 1861–1865. It is one of the most significant wars
ever fought in American History. Many Americans lost their lives, some defending freedom, and others defending the Union. The warfare was a
major contributor to the casualties suffered during this bloodbath. To fully understand this warfare, one must understand the individual factors
involved and how they affected the warfare. The five factors are: military strategy, worldview paradigm, weapons and supplies, terrain, and climate.
Military Strategy is important to understand because it is the way that warfare is carried out. A historian named Kelly Snell writes, "Old world
tactics and training were inefficient due to modern weaponry" (Snell). There was pressure for a transition to new military strategy because of the
new weapons. The tactics used before the civil war are often referred to as antebellum. Antebellum means "existing before a war" (Antebellum).
Advances in weaponry caused for a change of thought on how to approach warfare. "All of the military thinking of the day was influenced by
Napoleon" (Snell). This war therefore was set up for groundbreaking improvements in strategy. Heidler explains how the Union was trying preserve its
unity with the south, so in order to

Guerilla Warfare In The Movie, The Patriot
Today in time guerrilla warfare is used by one of the strongest armies of the world. These tactics were used even back during the revolutionary war. In
the movie the Patriot, this movie portrays the fight during the revolutionary war and the battles and the horror they faced. The battlegrounds used in the
war were a person's backyard. This new idea of guerilla warfare brought to the war was unconventional and efficient. There were small militias taking
out countless redcoats. Although it wasn't the traditional form of fighting it worked. In the movie, the militia was led by Benjamin Martin. General
Martin and his militias tactics were honorable.
The colonist were English natives so their tactics were the same as the British army. The Continental Regulars would line up like the British and mimic
almost everything they would do. The British are more trained and accurate so they would win every battle. The colonists were going to lose the war if
it wasn't for Benjamin Martin. Colonel Tavington shot the son of Benjamin Martin named Thomas Martin. That fired him up and what started the
rebellion using the militia. The first sight of the guerilla warfare was when they attempted to take his oldest son. He and his two ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
He struggled through many tragedies including the death of his children but the courage he had to go back on the battlefield and lift the spirits of the
colonists was truly amazing. In the movie, Colonel Tavington stabbed BenjaminВґs son who was attempting to avenge his own wife's death.
Completely distraught, Benjamin sat next to his deathbed just weeping. When asked if he would help with the war he declined. Soon after they left, he
reached into his pocket and saw the American flag which completely changed him. He came back and fought front line with his militiamen. This
immensely changed my view of Benjamin Martin instead of the vicious man he seemed to

Guerilla Fights
Finding a safe way to attack an Insurgency without killing innocent civilians is a hard task to complete. Civilians fight the war of the nation, at
random times and places. This creates a problem for conventional armies. Who is a civilian? Who is a foe? Two different strategies can be utilized to
fight this; take out the all the citizens, or get the people to go against their own insurgents and encompass the conventional army's ideas. I believe that
the only way to beat a counterinsurgency campaign is to utilize less collateral damage of warfare, while teaching the civilians to live for the
counter–ideal of restoring life to its normal state. This strategy will not kill many innocent people, while securing the population, leading to a loss...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Walzer states, "The war cannot be won, because the only available strategy involves a war against civilians; and it should not be won, because the
degree of civilian support that rules out alternative strategies also makes the guerrillas the legitimate rulers of the country... Fought by foreigners,
it is a war of aggression; if by a local regime alone, it is an act of tyranny." (Walzer 13). To win the war, the only option, according to Walzer, is to
kill civilians. He doesn't believe that this is the right was do win a war, so he goes on to say the war cannot be won, because of the amount of civilian
support. This leads me to believe that the only conventional way he sees of winning is not by following the Rules of Engagement, but rather by
winning the civilians over through a strategic mental battle of who is right. Once the civilians are removed from the battlefield, then the Rules of
Engagement can be put into action against the remaining guerilla

Assessment of United States' Performance in the Vietnam...
Assessment of United States' Performance in the Vietnam War
The quote is saying that the USA should have won the Vietnam War because they had better weapons and better trained soldiers than the Vietcong.
This can be split into 2 parts: 'America should have won' and, 'America had better weapons and training than the Vietcong'. I agree with the first part
because America should have won the Vietnam War as they are very powerful. I disagree with the second part because the Vietcong ha supplies from
Russia and China which were good weapons and they were extremely well trained, but in guerrilla warfare. It does NOT mean they were less advanced.
The USA was not automatically going to win. They ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
America did have better technology which you would have expected them to use toothier advantage more than they did. Where the American's had
helicopters, the Vietcong had bikes. The American's had bombs which they used in Operation Rolling Thunder. They had a large quantity of them too
as they dropped more bombs than were dropped in the whole of World War II. They had chemicals such as Agent Orange and Napalm which was
special. Regular Napalm just sets fire to things which can be put out with water or by taking the oxygen away. The American's developed it so that it
could burn without oxygen which created devastating effects. People rolled on the ground but it continued to burn through their body and it still burnt
people when they jumped in water.
I do disagree that the American's were better trained. They were better trained in conventional warfare and had a lot of experience from World War II.
But the Vietcong matched this. They were better trained than the American's but not in conventional warfare. They were experts in guerrilla warfare
which proved vital in their defeat on the USA. They also had a lot experience as they were at war with the French for a long time.
The American's also had more problems which prevented them from winning the war. In my opinion, this was probably the main reason America lost
the war. American support diminished rapidly as this was an

The Balangiga Massacre: Getting Even by Victor Nebrida
by Victor Nebrida and PHGLA All rights reserved The Philippine–American War started on February 4, 1899 and was officially proclaimed by
President Roosevelt to have ended on July 4, 1902. Although General Aguinaldo was captured on March 25, 1901, there followed no mass surrender
of other Filipino revolutionary generals. Fighting went on in Batangas, Pampanga, Tarlac, the Ilocos, and the Visayas. In Samar, General Lukban 's
control had been set and was holding firm. Kill everyone over ten. "Kill every one over ten." – Gen. Jacob H. Smith Criminals Because They Were
Born Ten Years Before We Took the Philippines. Editorial cartoon from the New York Evening Journal, May 5, 1902. Company C, Ninth U.S. Infantry
sailed into... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Surprised and outnumbered, Company C was nearly wiped out during the first few terrible minutes. But a small group of American soldiers, a
number of them wounded, were able to secure their rifles and fight back, killing some 250 Filipinos. Of the company 's original complement, 48
were killed or unaccounted for, 22 were wounded, and only 4 were unharmed. The survivors managed to escape to the American garrison in Basey.
Captain Bookmiller, the commander in Basey, sailed immediately for Balangiga with a force of volunteers in a gunboat. They quickly dispatched some
bolomen on the shore with a gattling gun and executed twenty more they found hiding in a nearby forest. As the American soldiers were buried,
Captain Bookmiller quoted from the Book of Hosea, "They have sown the wind and they shall reap the whirlwind." Thus ended the short–lived policy
of benevolent assimilation in Balangiga. Inspection of the ruins. General Jake "Howling" Smith and his staff inspecting the ruins of Balangiga in
October 1901, a few weeks after the retaliation by Captain Bookmiller and his troops. The U.S. Army: Krags and Schoolbooks? The American military
was in the Philippines to quell an "insurrection," a rebellion by the native Filipinos opposing American occupation. They were not there to fight a
people defending their homeland. This was the basic tenet taught to the American soldier sent to fight in the islands. When hostilities started in 1899 and

What Conditions That Lead To Guerrilla Warfare And...
1.What are the conditions that lead to guerrilla warfare and distinguishes revolutionary guerrilla warfare from historical guerrilla warfare? – There are
several conditions that lead a body of people within a state to the point of guerrilla warfare. Such factors can be found from an example of the policy
used for the revolution of the Chinese people including: "1) Arousing and organizing people. 2) Achieving internal unification politically. 3)
Establishing bases. 4) Equipping forces. 5) Recovering national strength. 6) Destroying enemy's national strength. 7) Regaining lost territories" (pg.
530). In addition, guerrilla warfare must be included not only in the militaristic atmosphere, but also in the political atmosphere. Otherwise, according
to Tse–Tung, the general population will lose confidence in the system and it will fail. Revolutionary guerilla warfare differs from historical guerrilla...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
What do you think are differences and similarities between the type of guerrilla described by Mao and insurgents that have fought the U.S. in Iraq and
Afghanistan? – The differences between the type of guerrilla warfare described by Mao Tse–Tung and the insurgents that have fought the U.S. in the
middle east can be found on page 532. The insurgents have not followed or carried out the interests of the whole people within the states listed. The
Shia make up only a small percentage of the Muslim population, however, they carry out most of the terrorist–style attacks on the general population.
Therefore, the general mass is not satisfied and thus continues to go against the Shia population. On the other hand, some similarities include small unit
leadership and tactics. Most of the terrorist style attacks originate from small rings within a terrorist cell much like the small guerrilla units of the Reds
from China. In conclusion, guerrilla warfare must be a collaborative effort from the general population of a state and it must include both political and
militaristic

Guerrilla Warfare
Revolution became very prominent in the life of the Uruguayans and Salvadorians. The documents from the Guerrilla Warfare and from Claribel
Alegria describe how the revolutionary struggle was for both of their countries and described the involvement of the women. Women became very
important through this time, by comparing and contrasting the obstacles and roles that the women had to overcome in these documents would give a
better view of how important women were for the revolutionary struggle. Similarities between the two documents were very relevant. Both in the
Guerrilla Warfare and in Alegeria's work talk about the women's role and involvement in the revolutionary struggle. This revolutionary struggles main
focus was wanting a better government with better rights for the working class. To prove their point the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Though Alegeria and the Guerrilla Warfare had some similarities they didn't agree on everything. The Guerrilla Warfare document was more of a
guide of being a guerrilla. It included tactics the guerrillas used to win over the public in order for them to accept their revolutionary struggle in
Uruguay. The women involvement was more in depth in this piece because it described the constant battle women had to face in order to become a
successful guerrilla. While Alegria's document was more in a personal level between the interviewer and the guerrilla leaders. He talked to the leaders
about their personal lives in El Salvador and how they tried to maintain a family throughout the revolutionary struggle. The role in the women's society
in the revolution was very different to the ones they were accustomed to. In the Guerrilla Warfare document it is explained that for the women to join
the fight they had to

The Vietnam War
The Vietnam War "The war on colour television screens in American living rooms has made Americans far more anti
–war than anything else. The full
brutality of the combat will be there in close–up and in colour, and blood looks very red on the colour television screen". The USA declared war on
Vietnam at a time of evident mass media involvement. The technological progress that was made allowed the full ruthlessness war to be broadcast the
people of America. As a result, the entire course of the war was dramatically changed. The images shown on the television consisted of distressing
images which showed the full brutality of the war. Filming was not restricted,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In addition, if the soldiers were to kill all the people present, this would have been viewed negatively in the minds of the American public. Hamer
also states that winning the war of "hearts and minds" cannot be achieved by killing random people that you suspect. It also cannot be won by
using heavy weapons such as the napalm bomb. This leaves the soldiers in a major problem. If they cannot use the heavy weapons which only the
USA has, they are as weak as their foes. However, the foes know the landscape very well, whereas the Americans are baffled by the landscape. This
idea relates to the idea in Source D where the soldiers had walked into a trap because they did not know where they were going. Therefore, Source
D has been proved to have some truth to it using the ideas of an American journalist in Source F. The My Lai massacre in 1968 was presumably the
most significant event in the Vietnam War. It resulted in 347 unarmed civilians being murdered. Source F is the reaction of an American soldier after
having just been told about the massacre. There are elements of delusion and justification for the massacre. He explains that many of the soldiers had
"never been away from home before". From this quote alone, he begins to reason and justify what had happened. The fact that 347 unarmed civilians is
not mentioned in the source shows

Geography : History And Geography
War is a timeless phenomenon that has shaped societies and cultures; war is greatly influenced by geography. History and geography are both
important when considering wars; history tells what events took place, but geography tells us the why, where, and how. One can study geography's
effects on war through geography's subtopics: physical, human, economic, and political geographies. For example, war strategies and methods are
geography based. Physical geography studies the terrain and landforms in the war–ridden area; these can be a disadvantage to individuals unknowing of
the area, and can be used to the advantage of the country being invaded. Human geography shows the relationship between the humans (soldiers and
civilians) and the land.
There is a great need for geographical knowledge, especially when considering war; if it was not important, The US Air Force Academy and West
Point would not study geography, and the government would not have a Department of Geography. Physical geography can affect war greatly–
regardless of the number of soldiers or the size of the weapons arsenal. From one point of view, a rough terrain and huge landmasses are detrimental;
if an army does not know how to decipher their way around them, they lose time and resources in a standstill. For the country on home terrain, this is a
huge advantage; living there gives them the advantage of knowing the land and how to maneuver with it. For this country, physical geography added a
natural

Essay on Book Report for Rifleman Dodd
1 BOOK REPORT Name: Smith, StephenGrade: LCpl Date: Section: . Book Title: Rifleman DoddAuthor: C.S. Forester Why I chose this book:
Originally this book was given to me by on of my combat instructors in Marine Combat Training(MCT). I wanted to read it but soon found it
impossible due to certain time constraints. I lost the book during the transition from M.O.S. school to my current residence. Just recently, I obtained
another copy of this book from a fellow Marine who currently works in the same shop. Give a brief description about this book: "Rifleman Dodd" is a
novel written on the account of a certain British foot soldier of the "Ninety–Fifth Foot" named Matthew Dodd who encounters... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
While sabotaging the city he was able to sneak through its gates undetected and set fire to the bridge's ropes. Tactical lessons learned from this book:
A few of the tactical lessons I learned from rifleman Matthew Dodd include proper concealment, guerrilla warfare–like maneuvers, keeping a safe
distance from enemy forces, absolute military bearing, and choosing your targets wisely, as well as, knowing when to fire at those targets.
Furthermore, Dodd was very successful with remaining undetected at opportune moments, as well as, knowing exactly when to increase the
distance from the enemy. What impressed me most was his ability to successfully communicate with allied forces who didn't necessarily speak his
language. He used hand and arm signals to pantomime and gesture what it was he was trying to get across to his comrades. This trait would
definitely fall under adaptability. Leadership lessons learned from this book: Dodd, as well as the French, possessed some good leadership skills which
could easily be learned from. First of all, Dodd was capable of leading the Portuguese rebels when he was English–speaking and they knew only
Portuguese. He used the correct body signals to instruct his fellow comrades besides the fact that they had such a huge language barrier. He was
meticulous in his planning making, even when there was only a split second to decide. Dodd posted sentries even when his troops were in no

Guerrilla Warfare and Violence in Thomas Goodrich's "Black...
Thomas Goodrich is an author that focuses most of his writings about the American Civil War. This book "Black Flag Guerrilla Warfare on the
Western Border, 1861–1865" depicts some of the most violent guerrilla fighting that took place along the Kansas and Missouri border. He is very
objective about presenting this sinister side of the Civil War. Mr. Goodrich's book portrays the horrific death, destruction, merciless killings, rapes,
and the millions of dollars worth of property seized or destroyed by the guerrillas on both the Union and Confederate side. This book tells about the
brutality of what happened to men when they surrendered. They were told they would be treated as prisoners of war only to be executed, and their
bodies ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
After the jayhawkers, bloody raids in 1861 he became a Southern sympathizer. Quantrill and his bushwhacker guerillas struck back for what the
jayhawkers had done to Missouri. He avoided capture many times and on August 21, 1863, led a surprise attack at Lawrence. Over 200 men and
boys were murdered in this raid and the town was stripped of what Quantrill and his gang wanted and then burned to the ground. More than $1.5
million worth of property were destroyed. One of Quantrill's most famous guerillas was Jesse James, who later became a legendary bank robber. This
book was one of the most eye–opening books I have read on the Civil War. Mr. Goodrich exposes one of the darkest times in our American History.
As the eyes of the nation was immersed on the big battles to the east, lawlessness ruled along the Kansas and Missouri border. I found this book to be
very interesting because it told the story from people loyal to the union, the south, and fellow citizens just trying to make a living. Kansas was a union
state and was anti–slavery. Missouri was also a union state but the majority of its population was pro–slavery. This resulted in a state of war within its
own borders between the U.S. Army and Missouri citizens. This was a civil war within the Civil War. The State of Missouri never officially joined
the Civil War due to its own internal struggles. Most of the male civilians, farmers that were killed were neutral regarding slavery but were

Causes Of The American Revolution
Historically, there are many speculations as to why and how the American Revolution started. Most historians argue that "taxation without
representation" was the cause of this war. The colonist were faithful citizens of the English empire, they both benefitted from each other. England
provided protection of pirates, guaranteed markets and in return the colonist increased their wealth. The conflict began when the British conquered
Canada from France, now Canada was not a threat to the colonists. The British became over 130 million in dept. And that is when they enacted the
stamp, sugar, and Townshend Acts on the colonist, to pay their fair share in their depts. The colonists deputed these taxes, stating that they were taxed
without representation in parliament. This was the spark of the revolution and what started the conflicts. However, there is controversy as to if the
American Revolution was a conservative movement or if it was radicle. Robert Eldon Brown argues that yes the American Revolution was conservative
stating that America had become a middle–class society and the separation from England was a rebellion about the overpowering political and
economic control that they imposed on the colonists. On the other hand, Alan Taylor and Gordon Wood proclaims that the revolution was radicle
explaining that the brutal tactics used during the war was radicle and that America was not middle class it was divided in strictly the upper elite and
the poor commoners, which created conflicts. "The American Revolution was as radicle as any other revolution, but in a special 18th century way"
is valid because of the extremely radicle guerilla warfare tactics used that was different than other revolutions, it was a peoples war against the
western imperialism, and the class difference and conflicts between the elite and commoners the war divided the society into two. Firstly, the
American Revolution was radicle because a never seen before radicle guerilla warfare tactic was used by the colonist to destroy the British. Secondly,
the American Revolution was the first effective war against imperialism of the west that resulted in freedom of the people. Finally, America was not
composed of middle–class; there were distinct

A Comparison Of The American And Vietnam Revolutionary...
H502 HISTORY OF INSURGENCY:
A COMPARISON OF THE AMERICAN AND VIETNAM REVOLUTIONARY WARS AND THE USE OF INSERGENCY
CW4 Joseph, Stephen E
WOSSE: 16–006B
26 September 2016
Table of Contents
A Nation for Change1
A Revolutionary War1
Liberating a Revolutionary War4
BIBLIOGRAPHY6
A Nation for Change
No one person wakes in the morning and decides to tackle years of institutional rule without thinking certain doom, discomfort, or in some cases, death.
Citizens living during the times within the United States (1775 – 1784) and Vietnam (1955 – 1975) decided to fight as one voice, for a cause they
believed and shared together. This unified voice, the will of the people, started as a single voice. Soon there were many voices with the same cry, to
push out policies, ideals, and laws that were not their own. Peaceful talks, debates, or discussions did not work, soon there was no other means but the
violence to break the will to continue.
The revolutionary wars were the violent means to which tactics used, was used as "a form of warfare [that is] uniquely adapted to undermine the
efforts of new and poor countries to maintain the freedom that they have finally achieved". President Kennedy spoke those words in 1962, the height
of the Vietnam War, and reaffirms the will of the people to that of the American people during its Revolutionary War; the will for independence
prevailed during trying times of offensive and defensive phases of war.
A Revolutionary

Gray Ghosts of the Confederacy: Guerrilla Warfare in the...
Brownlee, Richard S. Gray Ghosts of the Confederacy: Guerrilla Warfare in the West 1861–1865. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1986.
When the Civil War started many people of this nation were not expecting the chaos, destruction, and they certainly did not expect thewar to last so
long. The history of the guerrilla warfare began shortly before the start of the Civil War and lasted a few years after the war. The guerrillas dominated
Missouri to such an extent that the Union army had to station thousand's of troops in the state to try to control the turmoil that these guerillas caused.
As Richard Brownlee states on page 5 "The history of the western Confederate guerillas began in the state of Missouri several years ... Show more
Cloaked with the authority of the Union army, and dressed in blue uniforms as rapidly as they could obtain them, theses men created chaos and hatred
that existed for years. (42)
I understand why most Missourians feared and hated the Jayhawkers and Union soldiers. I would have found it very hard to remain loyal to the Union
if I was treated the same way.
The theme of loyalty leads to the main thesis of this book; the way the Missourians were treated; which was very badly by everyone. The guerillas
thought they were defending their state; but I believe that they caused more harm then good. When they would kill a man the guerillas would also
burn his house, and place of business but they would not harm his wife. They did not think or care about what would happen to that woman in the
future. Now not only does she not have a husband to provide for her, they also destroyed her place of residence; which leaves her homeless and
without any means of support.
When the Union troops such as the Kansans Brigade would come into Missouri, they would destroy towns and kill helpless people for no reason.
Many towns were destroyed such as the town of Osceola. "A million dollars' worth of property had been stolen or destroyed, and Osceola one of the
largest towns in Western Missouri, had ceased to exist." (39) An incident like this is the reason guerilla groups such as Quantrill's would revolt against
the union Soldiers like

What Was The Impact On The Use Of Guerrillas In Arkansas...
Guerrillas in Arkansas During the American Civil War, there were such things called guerrillas. No, I am not talking about the muscular black
creatures that hide in the jungle. Though that is exactly how the Confederate independent companies got there name. Where and when did guerrilla
warfare begin? Who did it involve? Who were these so called guerrillas and what was there strategy? Did certain Military commanders in Arkansas
make an impact on the use of guerrillas? What were the strategies that Federals and Unionists used to stop guerrilla warfare? Daniel Sutherland's
Guerrillas: The Real War In Arkansas explains how partisan fighters helped shape the strategic and tactical patterns of the war. Shows us the reasons
men became ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Arkansas's terrain of mountains and deep rivers favored guerrilla actions in the north, and swamps in the south. The most costly economic factors and
the most annoying of all guerrilla strategies were the suffering of river traffic and confiscation of its cargo. Guerrillas would hold the boats, take the
cargo, and serve as commissaries to the interior. Last, what were the Federal soldiers and Unionist going to do to stop guerrilla warfare? Because up
until the end of the war the United States government were basically supplying the Confederates and fighting them at the same time. In 1863, the
Federals had released their counter–guerrilla campaign. A campaign that would have several regiments of good troops be raised in Arkansas for a short
time to put down guerrillas. The counter–guerrilla acts were successful by reducing the power of Confederate guerrillas. An extensive variety of
strategies were played by Federal forces to defeat irregulars in Arkansas. Arkansas Unionist forces were used as anti–guerrilla troops. Forces which
used gunboats to control the waterways throughout rivers, and the head marshal's military system that spied on alleged guerrillas and imprison those
caught. By reinforcing that system, the Federal army developed an effective force themselves and defended Confederate raiders strategic targets.

Camp X: The Importance Of The Spy
Camp X: The Importance of the Spy
When asked about spies, most people instinctively think of James Bond, a member of the British Secret Service. Most people don't know however
that this classical character was inspired by the true events, of places like Camp X, where 007's creator, Ian Fleming, was trained as an intelligence
officer. Most stories of the Second World War revolve around the great battles, such as the Battle of Normandy. While these battles were remarkable,
the critical victories of the Second World War may not have been possible without the vigorous and fearless effort of spies and operatives, who can
influence the result of crucial operations for the betterment of their own objectives. Training camps were vital for producing ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The United States was not yet participating in the Second World War when Camp X was opened. The Camp opened on December 6, 1941, which
was a day before the Unites States was forced to join as a result of the Pearl Harbour Bombings. If the Japanese had implemented the attack six
months earlier, there never would have been a Camp X. Until the direct attack on Pearl Harbour, the United States were prohibited by Congress to
get involved with the war. Because of their inability to become involved, Colonel William "Wild Bill" Donavan, head of Office of Strategic
Services (OSS), which is a predecessor of the CIA, and President Franklin D. Roosevelt's Coordinator of Information, was interested in developing a
group of secret agents, Camp X was designed to help. Sir William Stephenson, a Canadian living in Britain, was the main facilitator of the project.
After using his contacts in Canada to purchase a suitable site in 1940, the camp was opened shortly after in 1941. Over the next few months, the
camp trained operatives in the art of secret warfare. Along with Canadian trainees, agents from the FBI and the OSS secretly attended the camp.
Included in the recipients of Camp X's training were five future heads of the CIA. The entry of the United States granted them the ability to establish
their own camps. Colonel Donavan depended on the resources of Camp X to

The Philippine-American War
This was America's first true colonial war as a world power. After defeating Spain in Cuba and in the Philippines in 1898, the U.S. purchased the
Philippines, Puerto Rico and several other islands from the Spanish. However, the Filipinos had been fighting a bloody revolution against Spain since
1896 and had no intention of becoming a colony of another imperialist power. In February of 1899, fighting broke out between the occupying
American Army and the Filipino forces. The basic causes of the Philippine–American War can be found in the U.S. government's quest for an overseas
empire and the desire of the Filipino people for freedom.
Following the surrender of the Spanish colonial government in the Philippines to American military forces in August 1898, tensions developed between
U.S. and Filipino forces near Manila. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The ghastly massacre of the U.S. infantry company whipped Americans into a vengeful fury. Chaffee believed that "false humanitarianism" was
responsible for the massacre; now, he said, it the troops followed his instructions "they will start a few cemeteries in Southern Samar." Gen. Jacob F.
Smith, known for good reason as "Hell Roarin' Jake, enraged by a guerrilla massacre of U.S. troops, launched a retaliatory campaign of such
indiscriminate fierceness that he was court–martialed and forced to retire.
The impact of the U.S. war in the Philippines continued for three and a half years before President Theodore Roosevelt declared it over in July 1902,
even though fighting continued in outlying islands for another decade. To keep the brutal nature of the war hidden from the American public, the
McKinley and Roosevelt administrations engaged in censorship, official denial, media spin, impressive generalities, and intimidation of war critics.
Many citizens nonetheless challenged the fiction of "caring integration" and denounced the imperial war as un–American and

Gun Rights and Freedom Essay
I have had guns in my life since I was young. I served eight years in the military, and have shot in competitions for many years. I also love the
outdoors, and enjoy the ability to put food on the table that is natural. I think the reasons for keeping the right to bear arms are so important that if
the American people lost that right; it would mean life changes that many would be unwilling to make. The Bill of Rights are a set of laws, which
includes the 2nd Amendment, which helps secure the public's freedoms. The public needs to decide if this law is still an important part of the
freedom this country enjoys. If the people do not protect this country and the way of life, who will? The public needs to take a close look at gun control
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
2).With 12.5 million hunters in the United States, it seems as though most families have a reason to support hunting rights in country. Safety is a top
propriety; new younger hunters are now required to pass a gun hunting safety class. The safety class deals with such issues as proper handling of a
firearm, and safety issues and how one must never point a gun at anything that the hunter does not want to kill."The hunter education course instills in
students the knowledge and skill to be a responsible and safe hunter. The basic course consists of 10 lessons during a minimum of 10 hours. Students
learn how hunting accidents are caused and how they can be prevented. Hunter responsibility and safety are stressed throughout the classes, which
consist of lectures, demonstrations, group discussions, practical exercises, and individual study and activity assignments" (Wisconsin department of
natural resources, 2009, p.1). Hunting is also important to the economy of the country in 2006, [125 million hunters entered the woods spending $22.9
billion that would have not went into the economy without hunting. Total cost of hunting equipment for hunting was $10.7 Billion]("2006 National
Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife–Associated Recreation," 2006). Which would not have went to local business without hunting. Hunting is not
just a pastime in the United States; it is big business "Americans use firearms to defend themselves from criminals at least

Guerrilla Warfare: The Vietnam War
No 7. The guerrilla wins if he does not lose, and the conventional army loses if it does not win.
'We Fought a military war; Opponents our Fought a political one. We sought physical attrition, Opponents Aimed for our psychological exhaustion. In
the process, we lost sight of one of the cardinal maxims of guerilla war. The guerilla wins if he does not lose, the conventional army loses if it does not
win. The North Vietnamese used their forces the way a bullfighter uses its cape – to keep us lunging into areas of marginal political importance. '
(Kissinger, 1969, 214)
When I first read the statement above, actually a bit confusing for personnel and soldiers who does not understand the tactics and strategy of guerrilla
and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
1 . Meaning of Victory in War of words ...... 261
War is a way to achieve political goals of a country . Where the decision for war was not in the hands of politicians dtangan military commander .
But the tactics and strategy used is certainly a decision of the military commander . Here, the role of a commander to determine what strategy or
tactics to use in order to win the battle so that the war can be won by his party .
The definition of the word win and a victory in guerrilla warfare and conventional war means different things both literally and under the conditions
and situation of late . As said by Kissinger in his book ' ...... ' that 'the guerilla wins if he does not lose ; The conventional army loses if it does not
win ' ( Kissinger 1969 , 214 ) . based on my understanding of the book , Kissinger tried to convey his opinion that the guerrilla war if the parties can
continue to launch guerrilla operations / battles that they have implemented to erode and destroy the morale of enemy troops on an ongoing basis or
until the opponent gave up or lost the will to fight , then this is where the guerrillas declared victory in the battle .
In contrast to the definition of the word win in a conventional war although the goal in every battle it has the same goal , but different definition of
victory itself . This is because the unconventional warfare tactics and strategy that takes precedence is conquering the real

Queen Nanny Of The Windward Maroons
Queen Nanny of the Windward Maroons, has been overlooked by historians, who limited their focus to only the male figures in Maroons History. Due
to her being overlooked factual information is unclear and her history was handed down thorough folklore. However, amongst the Maroons
themselves, Queen Nanny also known as Obeah Woman Nanny and Granny Nanny, is held in the highest honor. Back in the 17th to 18th century,
Nanny was a leader of the Rebellious group of black people called Maroons (people living on mountaintops) due to their style of living in the hilly
mountain tops from the Ashanti Tribe of West Africa, now called Ghana. She led the war between the Winward Maroon's and The British in the First
Maroon War. Though, not originally from Jamaican, but brought to Jamaica during the time ofslavery, she never received her freedom legally until a
treaty was reached between the Maroons and the British. Nanny became, known for her organized plans to keep and free the Maroons along with
other tribal African from slavery. This led to the freedom of also most 1000 slaves remaining free during the time of slavery in history. During the Era,
women are seen as second–class citizens and slaves having no say but Granny Nanny's leadership skills empowered her to break many barriers and
create a name for herself as studied in Organization Leadership.
Smith, 2
The Background History of Queen Nanny
What was slavery like in Jamaica
There are two types of African slaves

Technology And Information Warfare During World War II
Warfare Will Be Determined By Electronic Means In A Few Decades, Either On The Ground Or In Cyber Space. Since the end of World War II, the
instruments of war have been completely upgraded during the war; from motorization to mechanization. The powerful attack capability of mechanized
troops was fully demonstrated during WorldWar II. Thus, the degree of mechanization in the army became an important indicator to measure a country
's defense capabilities. This standard has become a popular standard in the world, in the subsequent several decades. Until 1991, the result of the first
Gulf War once again shocked the world. People first time realized the importance of battlefield information. TheUnited States and its allies with a
strong communication capabilities and reconnaissance capabilities won an overwhelming victory in the war. Information technology and information
warfare thus become the new trend of military development. Therefore, information battlefield will undoubtedly become the mainstream in the next
few decades; information supremacy will be the most important determining factor in the future. This essay will briefly review the previous
researches; it attempts to provide a common definition of information warfare. Then, it will describe the characteristics of information warfare; the
essay will look at the actual examples in the world. Finally, the essay will discuss and analysis the influence of information warfare and the
development potential; it will discuss

The Guerrilla Warfare And The American Civil War
The guerrilla warfare along the Kansas–Missouri border has generally been considered an outlier of the American Civil War. While interesting to read
about, its impact on the war and on Union policies were not always important to historians. Early in the study of this conflict historians chose to focus
on the leaders and actions of the guerrillas. More recently, scholars have endeavored to understand how guerrilla war in the Civil War affected the
society in which it took place. This shift in historiographical trends is, in part, due to the rise in guerrilla warfare in the present. However, questions still
remain over how this conflict fits in with the rest of America's military experience. Questions like, does the guerrilla warfare prove ... Show more
No other mention is made about guerrilla warfare. Because his work was published in 1973, when attention was still predominantly focused on the
conventional engagements of the Civil War, this oversight is unsurprising though certainly lamentable. Despite the lack of attention given to the
irregular forces supporting the Union and Confederate Armies, those men engaged in raids and operations that contribute to a deeper understanding of
why, during the American Civil War, a strategy of annihilation was supported by the Union as their strategy against the Confederacy. While the
development of guerrilla war does not factor into Weigley's thesis that the United States has moved from a strategy of attrition to a strategy of
annihilation, it is important in understanding how and why the United States made that change. For Weigley, this change came during the American
Civil War when Grant became Commanding General of the Army. Grant did not believe the war could be won with a single, decisive victory against
the Confederate Army, rather, he initiated a strategy to destroy the Confederate Armies through many battles and by attacking their economic
resources. The orders to begin destroying the war resources of the Confederacy may have had their roots in the Western and Trans–Mississippian
Theaters of the war because of frustrations associated with guerrilla war. Early in the war in Kansas, James Lane organized a mixed brigade to

Guerrilla Warfare Leaders of the 20th Century Essay
Historical interpretations relating to small wars in the post Napoleonic period in relation to insurgent guerrilla warfare in urban and agrarian societies
across the globe share universal themes. These commonalities will be explored relating why combatants in guerrilla warfare fight. Moreover, what
objectives guerrilla leaders wanted to achieve with their theories of social revolution. The works discussed are Mao Tse–tung, On Guerrilla Warfare,
Ernesto Che Guevara, Guerilla Warfare, and Carlos Marighella, Minimanual of The Urban Guerrilla. All three of these historical leaders were
well–educated men who were social reformers. All concerned with inequalities among their people. All devised ways to wage class warfare within their
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They wanted social and political systems to change and change fast. As a result, small guerrilla wars were waged.
These three books span the globe from China, Brazil, Cuba, and Bolivia. Consequently, these books influenced Ho Chi Minh in Viet Nam and
numerous other underground movements around the world.
Mao Tse–tung the Ruler of Red China and transformer of culture founded the People's Republic of China in 1949. Mao after ten years of fighting the
Nationalist army of Chiang Kai–shek retreated from battle to write On Guerilla Warfare. Mao successfully used his theories on guerrilla warfare and
ousted the Nationalists Chinese from the mainland.
Why Fight: Samuel B. Griffith II, translator of On Guerilla Warfare, explained by "Recognizing the fundamental disparity between agrarian and urban
societies, Mao advocated unorthodox strategies that converted deficits into advantages: using intelligence provided by sympathetic peasant population;
substituting deception, mobility, and surprise for superior firepower; using retreat as an offensive move; and educating the inhabitants on the
ideological basis of the struggle" (Back cover).
Imagine 400 million persons living at the bare subsistence level experiencing floods, droughts, epidemics, owning no land of their own (pg. 13). China
was a Feudal system rotten with unfair tax collectors, bandits,

Irregular Warfare Mindset Needed for Our Modern World Essay
Since World War II, there have been over 80 irregular conflicts, including civil and guerrilla wars, rebellions or insurgencies. The United States has
been involved in several of these conflicts, some of which are still ongoing, such as the conflict in Somalia. The conflict in Somalia, widely seen as
unsuccessful, saw a significant change from the conventional mindset to one of irregular warfare. While threats from conventional forces still exist in
today's environment, irregular warfare has become a mainstay across the globe.
The United States needs to adopt and maintain an irregular warfare mindset, above that of conventional, to ensure adaptable economic, political and
military capabilities in an ever evolving global environment. In ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Backed by the international community, including the UN, the U.S. attempted to provide basic services to the people of war–torn Somalia. Although
these stability operations ultimately failed, the U.S. has been able to capitalize on the lessons learned from Somalia. Somalia greatly changed the way
the U.S. conducted irregular warfare activities, such as stability operations and two other significant ones.
Counterinsurgency (COIN) and Counterterrorism (CT) operations have been used extensively in Somalia since 1992, especially since the failed use of
stability operations. While neither of these operations has had success in creating a stable Somalia, both have been instrumental in keeping Islamic
militants in check, particularly those with ties to al–Qaeda (i.e. al–Shabaab). Fighting terrorist organizations such as al–Shabaab and al–Qaeda have
been dominated by irregular warfare, which has spawned numerous military and academic studies regarding irregular warfare. In cases such as
Somalia, Afghanistan, and other global hotbeds for terrorism, the U.S. has refined the way irregular warfare is conducted.
The three irregular warfare activities listed above (stability operations, counterinsurgency, and counterterrorism) have led front pages since Somalia,
Iraq and Afghanistan. COIN, in particular, defines the way the U.S. approaches irregular warfare, but the U.S. is ultimately

Weapons and Tactics of WWI and WWII
In WW1 and WW2, the weapons and tactics of war were very important towards the different countries and sides. They each had a certain way of
fighting and defending. In World War One, it was harder for people because it was earlier in the 1900s. But, it was a little easier during World War
One because the weapons and tactics were amped up.
During WorldWar one, the weapons weren't all that great. But it was a time when a lot of new weapons were introduced and used very much in a
deadly way. They had rifles, gas, gigantic guns, and many other things.
The weapons during this time includes guns, such as, rifles, machine guns, artillery and weapons on tanks. Speaking of tanks, when ww1 started the
first tank was introduced and was used as a weapon and still is being used as a weapons. Some other weapons of this time period were Mortars that
were pressurized guns that pushed out little bombs. There were also gasses, but they weren't very successful because they would blow up
unexpectedly. Flamethrowers were also very big for germans, they used them against the french and it definitely worked. One of the main things that
was used was aircraft. They took new ideas and turned them into weapons and new ways to get around.
With the weapons came the tactics to World War One. The main warfare tactic was defensive trenches. People made many trenches and hid in them.
But they also stored weapons and fought against people. They would shoot from inside the trenches, but then some people

Nightmare In Jamestown Movie Analysis
In the movie, The New World: Nightmare in Jamestown begins with the voyage of about one hundred men journeying to discover treasure in the New
World called Jamestown. These men were part of what was called the, Virginia Company. The Virginia Companies exploration was predominantly for
treasure like gold and silver. The voyage took about four months. At the time, Jamestown was not the place to be living. In Jamestown the land has been
stricken with a scarcity of food and there had been a staggering amount of infections going around. Fortunately, they had the assistance from England
who shipped them different resources essential in order to endure the harsh conditions of Jamestown.
Originally when the colonists arrived at Jamestown they only ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
After their third year in Jamestown, they began running out of wheat and barley, which was predominantly their food at the time, so they began eating
dogs, cats, snakes, and humans. After searching Jamestown, they were let down by not having found silver and gold, they found tobacco. After the
new shipments came for food it seemed to be infected with rats which created the bubonic plague. This killed many people.
In conclusion, the Virginia Company came close to failing in Jamestown. Unfortunately they were not able to find their envisioned treasure of gold
and silver. However, they found crop of tobacco which was a huge discovery. Ultimately, the death of their leader, Bortholomew Gosnold seemed to be
scary for the colonists it proved to be constructive with the new leadership of John

Guerilla Warfare Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Connie Ripp

More from Connie Ripp (9)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Guerilla Warfare Essay