4. Presentation outline
1. Interactive technologies
• IWB resources + examples
2. From technology to teaching
• task-based language teaching
3. Interactive teaching
• Mobile technologies
• Video communication
5. iTILT (Interactive Technology in Language Teaching)
EACEA Lifelong Learning: 511751-LLP-1-2010-1-BE-KA2-KA2MP
January 2011 - April l 2013
Consortium of 7 European universities and institutes (Antwerp, Barcelona, Bilkent,
Cardiff, Heidelberg, Nice & Utrecht)
Teaching foreign languages with interactive whiteboards
workshops on the IWB for language teaching
• edited volume on classroom CALL: Cutrim Schmid & Whyte (2014).
Teaching languages with technology. Bloomsbury.
• research monograph on
Implementing and Researching Technological Innovation in Language
Teaching: Whyte, 2015, Palgrave
6. the iTILT story … 2010
• integration of new
technology: IWB (2010)
• support for teacher
integration of IWB in
language education
• document and research
the process: classroom
video clips, participant
feedback
• creation of teacher
education resource:
website with handbook,
practice reports, partner
selection
12. Watch and analyse: videos
¤ Example 1 - Magic
schoolbag -
http://itilt.eu/iwb-practice?
id=441
¤ Example 2 - Listening for
error correction
http://itilt.eu/iwb-practice?
id=401
¤ Example 7 - Drag and drop
for split headlines
http://itilt.eu/iwb-practice?
id=298
¤ What interactivity does the
technology provide that is
otherwise more difficult or
impossible?
¤ Who contributed to the
teaching/learning
materials? Who is
controlling the technology,
teacher or learners?
¤ What can we conclude
about language learning
opportunities in this clip?
13. Watch and analyse: responses
¤ Example 1 - Magic schoolbag
First name A through H
https://padlet.com/whyshona/
4cmus08qo08w
¤ Example 2 - Listening for error
correction
First name I through P
https://padlet.com/whyshona/
umbsj1melskp
¤ Example 7 - Drag and drop for
split headlines
First name Q through Z
https://padlet.com/whyshona/
ya314jnlb23f
¤ What interactivity does the
technology provide that is
otherwise more difficult or
impossible?
¤ Who contributed to the
teaching/learning materials?
Who is controlling the
technology, teacher or learners?
¤ What can we conclude about
language learning opportunities
in this clip?
¤ Look at 2 minutes of all 3 clips,
post on your assigned padlet,
read other responses
22.
Erasmus+ 2014-1-UK01-KA200-001821
(Sept 2014 -August 2017)
Consortium of 6 European universities and institutes (Belgium, France,
Germany, Netherlands, Turkey, Wales)
Interactive language teaching with technologies.
iTILT 2 website
Interaction in language teaching with technologies, Nice workshop,
January 2016
iTILT (Interactive Teaching in Languages with
Technology)
23. iTILT 2: interactive TEACHING in
languages with technology
1. Video exchange
2. Video report
3. Live
videocommunication
TBLT?
• meaning not form
• information gap
• own resources
• outcome
24. Primary video exchange project
Clip 1
https://vimeo.com/192448361
iTILT2_2016
TBLT?
• meaning not form
• information gap
• own resources
• outcome
27. collaboration
for interactive
teaching
• materials design criteria
wp.me/p28EmH-e
• Palgrave-Macmillan 2015
Implementing and
researching technological
innovation in language
teaching
• communities of practice in
CALL teacher education
wp.me/p28EmH-7s
28. Workshop summary
First iTILT Project:
interactive TECHNOLOGIES (IWB)
IWB materials
Practice examples
Technology training
Second iTILT Project:
interactive TEACHING & TBLT
Mobile technologies
Videoconferencing
Pedagogical development
http://www.itilt2.eu
