The For Efficient Distribution Of The European Commission...

The For Efficient Distribution Of The European Commission...
1) Briefly summarise the main points of the case
Verboven's (2009) discusses vertical restraints, concluding their necessity for efficient distribution,
discussing how the European Commission has altered its interpretation of Article 81 overtime. Three
types of restraint are highlighted: Selective distribution, Exclusive distribution and Exclusive
dealing, and that restraint adoption depended on current levels of regulation. Verboven (2009)
explains that vertical restraints became subjected to EU Competition Laws and due to 'cumulative
anti–competitive effects ' were reformed, becoming stricter. By 2002, new block exemptions aimed
to increase flexibility on acceptable agreements and that only Selective or Exclusive distribution can
be applied, not both. Black clauses including Retail Price Maintenance (RPM) and passive selling
outside of territories were listed. Nevertheless, post–2002 manufacturers were now allowed to make
certain vertical agreements (excluding black clauses), assuring their market share was within the
newly defined thresholds (in general 30%).
Overall, Verboven (2009) emphasised three main issues. Firstly, double marginalisation occurring
when both manufacturer and dealer apply separate profit incentivised mark–ups. Secondly, vertical
externalities result in dealers having no incentive to provide sale and after–sale services, as the
dealer ultimately provides the manufacturer with increased profits. Finally, competing dealerships
may freeride on
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Foreign Corrupt Practice Act
The US Foreign Corrupt Practice Act (FCPA) of 1977 is the anti–corruption law. It was the first law
that introduce corporate liability which is responsible for the third parties and extraterritoriality for
corruption offences, which cause companies and persons can be held criminally and civilly
responsible for corruption offences committed aboard. Since 1977, the anti–bribery provisions of the
FCPA have applied to all U.S. persons and certain foreign issuers of securities. With the enactment
of certain amendments in 1998, the anti–bribery provisions of the FCPA now also apply to foreign
firms and persons who cause, directly or through agents, an act in furtherance of such a corrupt
payment to take place within the territory of the United ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To have a record in criminal penalty, you may be imposed for violations of the FCPA's anti–bribery
provisons: corporations and other business companies are written up to a fine up to $2,000,000;
$100,000 and imprisonment for up to five years. The actual fine could be up to twice the benefir that
the defendant may seek to obtain by making the corrupt payment. Beware that the fines imposed on
individuals may not be paid by their employer. Majority of the businesses can face up to $10
thousand in civil sanctions for violating the ACT. While officers, directors, employees and agents of
the companies can may face same charge for violating the ACT, companies can be lucky by not
paying for any fines that are imposed on

Anti Dumping Law And The Context Of Wto Essay
Anti–Dumping Law in the Context of WTO WTO was established with the objective of promoting
free trade. Barriers to free trade may be tariff barrier or non–tariff barrier. Tariff regimes are easy to
administer and simple to understand but non–tariff measures involve intricate issues and are
governed by various WTO agreements. In this context, Anti–dumping is one of the most frequently
used non–tariff measure. WTO rules allow the member countries to opt for Anti–dumping measures
with specific stipulation. On this note, if a country today has Anti–dumping legislations, it must be
consistent with the WTO's agreement. The country's trade practices and procedures in actual
investigation of Anti–doping must conform to the agreement. Anti–dumping has unique combination
of political and economic manipulability. During the last fourteen years of WTO, the use of Anti–
dumping has become rampant that it is criticised as threatening to limit the market access achieved
under WTO trade negotiations over the last fifty years or so. Even though the use of WTO's Anti–
doping has been associated with fear that its measures are used for protectionist purpose, many
countries support it because it can be used to counter against unfair trade practices. Anti–Dumping
Duties in the Context of WTO In the past, Anti–dumping duties have been distinguished from other
forms of administered protection by the trade problem they were used to remedy. Anti–dumping
duties were a government's remedy for

Doping And Its Effect On Athletes
Doping has been present in sport since professional competition began and can be traced back to
Ancient Greece. In the last century, doping has escalated as a problem due to physical advantages it
gives athletes and health risks associated with long term use (Derse & Wilson, 2001). For doping
prevention to be successful support staff must establish boundaries and understand motives behind
an athletes' decision to dope, including ethical considerations. Ethical decision–making is the ability
to distinguish morally what is right and wrong (Brand, Melzer, & Elbe, 2010). Doping can be
defined as use of a substance or method to enhance appearance and/or performance to gain an unfair
advantage in competitive sport. For a drug to be banned in sport it needs to be evaluated as being
harmful to the human body, have potential to enhance performance, and violate sporting ethics
(Novick & Steen, 2014). Social networks within the sporting community have an effect on athletes'
perception towards doping, influencing athletes' ethical views. Testing systems are used to deter
athletes from doping; however, undesirable attitudes towards testing methods developed by Anti–
Doping Personnel (ADP) exist due to inconsistent and unreliable practices. Sporting ethics are
expected to be maintained through excellence, hard work, and 'fair play'; however disparity exists
towards what is perceived as 'fair play' regarding Performance and Image Enhancing Drugs
(PIEDs). Professional athletes feel

The Anti Competitive Agreement Within Private Healthcare...
5. The anti–competitive agreement in private healthcare industry
Under Competition Law, anti–competitive agreement is the most common arrangement caughtby
Ch.I Prohibition CA98. This is because an infringement could be found merely on the basis of the
undertakings' anti–competitive behaviour and the impacts of the behviour on the market, without
having to consider whether or not the undertakings hold a dominant position in the relevant market.
Therefore, it is crucial for service providers in PH market to pay attention to their arrangements with
other providers in the market. The definition of 'Agreement' under Ch.I is very wide. It covers all
types of commercial arrangements including both in writing or agreed verbally. Also, an ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There are a variety of schemes provided by private hospitals, which differ in nature, value,
sophistication and formality of benefits. CMA has identified that incentive schemes provided by
private hospital mainly offers two kinds of benefits to the clinicians (GPs and consultants) which are
financial benefit and provision of services or facilities.
5.1.1. Incentives schemes provided to GPs
According to the research of CMA, incentive schemes that provide financial benefit to the GPs are
not very common in the PH market because the hospital knows it may give rise of competition issue,
however, it is not uncommon.
(a) Financial benefits
CMA has identified that the financial incentive schemes are introduced in several ways to the GPs.
Firstly, the incentive scheme is not necessary to be an individual regime. It can be operate as a part
of another scheme or a program. For example, in 2010, in the healthcare assessment program that
provided by BMI, any GPs who carried out preoperative assessments on the

A Traveler's Guide to Gifts and Bribes
Financial Management Policy
Professor: Ms. Gleason
A Traveler's Guide to Gifts and Bribes
Harvard Business Review
Why might bribery become a problem for U.S. managers working in foreign countries?
The FCPA was structured to help U.S. companies understand what bribery is, and what is or is not
acceptable behavior at home and in other countries. The confusing issue is that even with this
guidance, it is not always clear what exactly is to be considered a bribe. Under the Act, not all
payments are deemed to be bribes. FCPA doesn't forbid payments to lesser figures, it allows bribes
to facilitate ongoing business activities, as there is no monetary guideline it requires companies to
keep reasonable records of the transaction. Brides given ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When the U.S. stood completely alone in its legislative quest to curtail foreign bribery, the
catastrophic scenario did not materialize. "As the Government Accountability Office (GAO) noted
four years after the implementation of the FCPA in a study called the Impact of the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act on U.S. Business; claims that U.S. companies have lost sales...are difficult, if not
impossible, to substantiate and quantify" (Graham, 1984). Further, a paper published in the Journal
of International Business used published data to test the competitive disadvantage theory and found
that "the FCPA had not negatively affected the competitive position of American industry in the
world marketplace" (Graham, 1984). Even then, when the American industry was the only one
worldwide facing these kinds of restrictions, anti–bribery laws did not negatively impact their export
performance or market share.
In today's world, several markets where such an act may exist may provide a competitive
disadvantage include those of China, the Middle East, Africa, and other emerging markets. This is in
part due to the lack of similar laws in these markets and tradition based business practices where
bribery, gratitude, or gift given is a norm. "Unfortunately, in the context of China, this has the
potential to place American companies in a position where they must decide

Survivor Fan Culture
Posted on an Internet forum, this comment from a Survivor fan demonstrates a key dynamic of the
fan community constructed around the program. This paper investigates elements of the audience
reception of the American reality TV show Survivor (Mark Burnett Productions for CBS, 2000–,
US), and the comment above raises the central issue I aim to address here. By exploring the show in
terms of its fan culture and examining the Survivor fandom in relation to existing theoretical and
critical work on fandom, I will argue that through online activity, Survivor fans compete with one
another just as the contestants battle against each other in the weekly challenges on screen. It is this
very sense of competition that I will assert differentiates the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Spoiling practices, changing fan/producer dynamics, and new media and consumerist engagement
with the show has produced a competitive fan culture unique in its apparent anti–communal and
decidedly negative undercurrents. What I have described as the often conflictual and competitive
nature of this fan culture – or rather the picture of a selected aggregation of fans – makes sense if
one considers that these fans didn't originate in a traditionally 'marginalized' subculture (as with
earlier conceptions of sci–fi fans, for instance). The Survivor fandom is conflictual because the
source of fans' interest isn't the show, but rather the overall fractious and competitive culture itself.
Fandom scholarship and research on the Survivor fandom in particular will require continual
analysis of fan participation and online engagement, as dynamics seem to shift somewhat over time.
Scholarship, too, will need to begin more thoroughly incorporating fans' use of new media as I have
only conducted surface–level analysis

Plavix Case Study Essay
Patent Games: Plavix Case Study
Columbia Southern University
Abstract
This case study illustrates the conflict between patent protection and preserving a pure competitive
market. Pharmaceutical companies are granted patent rights to newly developed drugs for a limited
amount of time. Through legal means they are able to form monopolies and maximize their profits. a
parent company can move to delay the release of its generic comparison through legal and illegal
measures. In the following case Bristol–Myers Squibb fell victim to their own anti–competitive
practices.
Why did Bristol–Myers Squibb and Sanofi–Aventis seek a settlement? Apotex had was near the
conclusion of the government mandated 30 month stay brought on by ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Sherman's strategy
Bristol–Myers Squibb's deceptive practices were likely to catch up to them. This occurred when
they crossed paths with Sherman who led Apotex at the time. After everything settled Sherman
acknowledged in an interview that he knew the FTC would reject the proposed agreements made by
Bristol–Myers Squibb and Sanofi. He also recognized that their spokesman didn't realize his offer
would cause adverse action against Bristol–Myers Squibb (Baron, 2010). He played to their
ignorance and entered the agreement. There is no direct answer to the ethics of Sherman's strategy.
He did not actively participate or even condone Brisol–Myers Squibb's collusion; in fact he knew
the agreement would be rejected. There is no way of truly knowing whether Sherman acted with
malice when implementing his strategy.
Should the FTC and the state attorneys general have rejected the agreements? The FTC and state
attorney was right in rejecting Brisol–Myers Squibb's proposed agreements on the grounds that it is
an anti–competitive practice. The second agreement would have been rejected as well provided
Bristol–Myers Squibb was completely honest with the FTC. Upon submission of the second
agreement to the department of justice they affirmed under oath that all agreements were as listed on
the document with no side arrangements (Chen, 2011). After the initiation of an investigation
conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigations

South Africa Competition Policy Originates From The...
South Africa competition policy originates from the Regulation of Monopolistic Conditions Act,
1955 (Act No. 24 of 1955). There was a need to prevent dramatic increases in oligopolies hence a
review of the Act in the 1970s that found that the policy had been unsuccessful in preventing a
dramatic increase in oligopolies. Thus, the Maintenance and Promotion of Competition Act, 1979
(Act No.96 of 1979) was introduced which was administered by the Competition Board.
Amendment of the Act gave further power to the Competition Board, including the ability to not
only eradicate new concentrations of economic power but also existing monopolies and oligopolies.
However, on both substantive and logical grounds the amendment to the Act still had flaws that
prevented the effective application of competition law. This is contradicting the main objective of
promoting competition in SA.
Economic policy in SA was formed with dependence on extraction industries such as gold and
diamond extraction. In the 19th century these industries were isolated from world markets. Policies
in these industries protected investors whom most were foreign. When government realised the risks
of over–specialisation in the mining industry it adopted policies that encourage farming and local
manufacturing. Monopoly concessions were issued around the 19th century. Ensuring manufacturers
benefit from low input costs such as electricity and steal, through protective tariff barrier, and
supplied by state owned

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Competition Act
The major concern of Competition Act is to deal with anti–competitive agreements, abuse of
dominant position, combination and regulation of combination. Few of these are discussed below
with their specific provisions:–
Anti– Competitive Agreements:–
Section 3 of the competition act deals with the anti–competitive agreements. This section also
defines it. It prohibits entering into any agreement which may have an adverse effect on the
competition within India. This makes them void and in contravention to the law. This act specifies
two kinds of anti– competitive agreements– one which law itself presumes that it is an anti–
competitive practice and the other is agreement which affects the competition in a way or the other.
The provisions of this also applies to the enterprises which are owned by the State and also to the
PSUs but this act does not apply to the functions of state which can be termed as the 'Sovereign
Functions'. Some of the trade practices which are considered as anti– competitive are Bid rigging,
cartel, limiting the production or supply of a commodity.
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is mentioned that the chairperson would not be a person of Judiciary and he/she would hold the
office either for five years or the age of sixty five, as per Section 10(1) and he would be very much
eligible for reappointment. Under competition act, the competition commission of India has been
given all the powers of Civil Court and the Section 60 of the act gives the overriding effect to the act
despite the other laws which was also confirmed in the case of Haridas Exports v. All India Float
Glass Mfgrs Association. The commission would have the power to probe into agreements,
dominance of position or in regulation on combination through the provisions contained in the
Section 19, 20, 26, 29,and 30 of the competition

Advantages Of Anti-Competitive Agreement
CHAPTER IV
ANTI–COMPETITIVE AGREEMNENT
"People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the
conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices."
While doing business in India, parties are prohibited from executing anti–competitive agreements.
Generally, the agreements which cause or are likely to cause appreciable adverse effect on
competition ("AAEC") are anti–competitive agreements. However, the Competition Act, 2002
("Act") recognizes intellectual property rights and to facilitate their protection, the Act permits
reasonable restrictions imposed by their owners. Similarly, the Act exempts agreements between
exporters as exports do not impact markets in India. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The most obvious example would be that of agreements between enterprises dealing in the same
products. However, in general, it is important to define the relevant market(s). To attract the
provision of the law, the products must be substitutes. Being at the same stage of the production
chain implies that the parties to the agreement are both (all) producers, or retailers or wholesaler. As
has been interpreted over the years in the U.S. (and enacted more recently in other countries) a
dissention is drawn in this regard between horizontal and vertical agreements. In certain
circumstances it can be established that firms that are collaborating on some socially valuable
activity may need to agree to do away with competition so to establish the cooperative relationship.
In this, the European Community law goes beyond the objective of maximizing welfare and
explicitly allows some Restrictive contracts if they promote progressiveness and consumers
ultimately stand to gain. The Japanese law also allows for actions in contravention of the law
provided they are in the "public interest". It would be dangerous to allow the kind of discretion in
interpretation possible under the Japanese law. Any exceptions that are permissible should be clearly
laid down. However, we recommend that Restrictive contract which are designed to promote use of
energy efficient manufacturing processes and production of Eco–friendly products or conservation
of natural resources should be explicitly permitted as

Stopping Fraud and Illegal Activities in Organizations...
In today's competitive and modern world of business, it is very significant for companies and firms
to conduct some of their business activities internationally. In order to stop fraud and illegal
activities from happening there are a few acts and documents that have been enabled. The Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is a law that congress primarily passed in 1977. This act prohibits
businesspersons from bribing foreign officials to secure advantageous contracts. The United States
also regulates payments to foreign officials. Giving cash or kind benefits to foreign government
officials to obtain business contracts and other favors, this is actually often considered a normal
practice to do. To reduce such bribery among representatives of the U.S. Corporations, Congress
enacted the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act also known as FCPA in the year of 1977. The policy
behind the FCPA was to combat the negative impact of bribery on free and fair market competition.
The issue which led to the passing of the FCPA was the ethical problem in international business
dealings which had to do with the legitimacy of some side payments being made to government
officials. In the U.S. most contracts that are formed are formed within the private sector. This is
different though in foreign countries because decisions on major construction and manufacturing
contracts are made by government officials because of extensive government regulation and control
over trade and industry. Side payments

Case Study Essay example
1. Assume ParaWorld was eventually ordered to cease and desist due to IP infringement. What
category of IP has ParaWorld most likely infringed? Explain the actions that constitute such an
infringement. (5 Marks) 2. What are some of the anti–competitive behaviours SesamWare might be
guilty of? How did/might SesamWare's behavior adversely affect free market competition upon
which international trade depends? ( 5 Marks) 3. Is there an international law governing Sesame's
behaviour? How will competition laws be enforced globally? (5 Marks) 4. If SesamWare had been
headquartered in a country that had no competition laws, as is the case in many developing
countries, or if SesamWare never entered into a contract (for example to buy ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
2. Some of the anti–competitive behaviours SesamWare might have engaged in are as follows: *
Dominance and Monopoly: The Company brought many other competitors and became the
dominant force in the software industry. This granted them power to dictate terms. * Pyramid
Scheme: The gamers were lured into accepting licenses which contained clauses which were meant
to benefit the organization in the long–run and not the licensees. * Refusal to deal: SesamWare
rendered other companies inadequate to compete by strategically eliminating them from the market.
* Issues regarding acquisitions: The phrase "more than meets the eye" perfectly fits the situation.
The main motive of the acquisitions seems to be eliminating competition to gain dominance in the
market. * Predatory Pricing: The initial contract fee was too low which made it impossible for the
other software companies to compete. 3. There is no single authority responsible for the
enforcement of international laws. (FITT) However, there are many entities that are concerned with
implementation and could possibly have an impact on SesamWare. They are as follows: * GATS
and GATT contain provisions dealing with monopolies and TRIPS and GATS recognize the
sovereignty of governments to take actions against anti–competitive behaviours. * Organization for
Economic

Monopolistically Competitive Markets and Gains From Trade...
Monopolistically competitive markets and gains from trade
Introduction
The neo–classical models of international trade provide powerful tools to understand the gains from
trade through international division of labour. An analysis of the common assumption these models
rest on reflects they all assume perfect competition between the firms. However, in the reality, we
can observe that some for industries, the competition on the market is seriously impaired. Hence, the
analysis of the gains from trade can not be explained by these neo–classical models. New theories of
trade have tried to understand the impact of trade liberalisation on such markets. Is competition on
some markets impaired as a result of market ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
network industries that need a lot of investments. The average cost of such industries can be pictured
by figure 1.1: the average cost is very important for a low level of output and decreases rapidly as
the production increases.
Firstly, the importance of the fixed cost can be considered as a barrier for the competitors to enter
the market. Secondly, even if competitors enter the market, still the fewer firms share the market, the
more efficient they are. This leads to an imperfectly competitive market structure termed
monopolistically competitive market that can take the form of monopoly or oligopoly.
1.2 Price and average cost on a monopolistically competitive market.
Let us consider a monopolistically competitive market in a closed economy. We assume the demand
and cost functions to be symmetric for all the firms. The competition the firms face is temperate:
Firstly and because and because of internal economies of scale, the firms are in limited number.
Secondly, because they produce relatively different products and because the consumer's preferences
may not change for a slight price difference, they can adopt in some extent monopoly pricing, which
results in a limited production and an increased price. Thus there is a trade–off between profit–
maximising behaviour which can result from tacit arrangements, and the preservation of market
power. Two relationships determine the number of firms and the price they charge in a

Google vs. Monopoly
Google vs. Monopoly
Content
Introduction.................................................................................................................................2
Long Journey To Victory
.......................................................................................................................2
Evil Monopoly
...........................................................................................................................................3
Conclusion................................................................................................................................4
References..............................................................................................................................6
Google vs. Monopoly
Introduction When running a large system of goods or services which millions of people follow, it is
obvious there will be ones who will be jealous of such a system and who will try to prevent or break
this system by any means whether it involves cheating or ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
(U.S., 2013)
The resolution disappointed consumer rights groups and Google rivals such as Microsoft, which had
lodged complaints with regulators in the hope of legal action that would split up or at least hobble
the internet's most powerful company. (Timberg, 2001) Evil Monopoly A monopoly is an
aristocratic domination of a specific product or service by one essence. It usually associates with a
control by a business organization. A classic example of a monopoly would be Microsoft. Oligopoly
is a relevant term in which a product or service is managed by a small group of large business
organizations. Generally, economists come to the same agreement that monopoly is in fact
corrupting and damaging. A monopoly weakens the free market moderation which in turn leads to a
crippled economy. This is how the progress for capitalism is supported. The outcomes of oligopolies
can turn out the same way but since there is a small group of large corporations, the competition is
the key to preventing the disadvantages that can easily happen under monopolistic control.
Monopoly opens doors wide for anti–competitive practices.
Price gouging is one of such practices. If there is not

A Comparison of Two Monopolists in a Competitive Market Essay
A Comparison of Two Monopolists in a Competitive Market
According to Webster , to have a monopoly is to have exclusive ownership, possession, or control.
The following essay is an examination of Microsoft in comparison to this definition and another
commonly known monopoly, Standard Oil. Also attention will be given to the necessary role of and
problems with monopolies. Competitive Market vs. Monopoly A competitive market consists of
many buyers and sellers. Markets thrive because an equilibrium price is established through natural
competition and no single buyer or seller can affect that price. Instead both buyer and seller must
take the price given by the market based on the dynamics of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Such actions generally target existing competition or prevent the rise of future competitors. Some
examples of such actions are refusal to sell to a particular customer in order to eliminate
competition, lowering prices below cost (price war), and contracts that close channels of distribution
or supplies to competitors. Though its interpretation is not particularly clear, The Sherman Anti–
Trust Act is the standard used for determining trade misconduct and violates. Standard Oil January
2, 1882 marked the formation of the Standard Oil Trust. It was the invention of attorney Samuel
Dodd and fuelled by the control of John D. Rockefeller. Rockefeller began by concentrating on the
refining business. He then expanded to other aspects of the oil industry to include extraction, sales,
transportation, research, marketing even to the point of barrel manufacturing. The practices that
brought Standard Oil to its peak became the evidence of its demise. Rockefeller kept a low profile
on his company earnings and hid the profits by reinvesting. Other acts were more covert and
damaging. Standard Oil had agreements with the railroads in which the railroad provided not only a
lower transportation price but also gave a Standard Oil a kickback from the higher prices charged to
competitors. The railroad also provided information regarding competitors shipments. This greatly

What Is Market Failure?
What is market failure? (3 Marks)
"Market failure occurs when resources are not allocated efficiently – in other words total economic
surplus is not being maximised" (Reference 1). Market failure is when the market is not working at
equilibrium which is also known as total surplus or market efficiency. Market failure can happen
when the Government impose a tax, price ceiling, price floor or a quota, this then causes price the
rise of fall, which means total surplus will not be reached. The diagram attached shows a tax
imposed on the banana market. This has caused prises to rise, and demand to fall. It has also caused
a deadweight loss. A deadweight loss is an avoidable loss bared by both the consumer and producer,
that reduces the total surplus. This means that the market is not producing at equilibrium, therefore it
has caused market failure. In this case the 50c tax has caused the decrease in consumer and proud er
surplus to be the same but in most cases it will be swayed one way. The tax is 50c but the price has
only increased 25c, this means that the profit has decreased 25c per item as well. Another way the
market can fail is when a firm or multiple firms have to much power in the market place. This is
called a monopoly market or oligopoly if there are multiple firms. This causes market failure
because it allows the firms to be price makers instead of price takers. This is because the consumers
have no other option.
Discovering Economics 3rd Edition | Greg

Dumping Subsidy and Trade Disputes Essay
Dumping Subsidy and Trade Disputes Too many questions have been asked if dumping implies
unfair trade practices. Recently, disputes over dumping make it difficult to decide whether or not we
should allow this activity to enter our country. Many of us are equally familiar that more foreign
imports mean more jobs are being destroyed in American industries. Because of this particular
reason, WTO and GATT members have worked together to see if there is a relationship between
dumping and unjust trades. In their study, some have discovered that dumping benefits the economy
and helps increase competitions among various industries in the U.S. However, there were also
some others who took the opposite side by arguing that dumping is an ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
However, if dumping is introduced, trade may emerge. Each firm will limit the quantity that it sells
in its home market, recognizing that if it tries to sell more it will drive down the price on its existing
domestic sales. If a firm can sell a little bit in the other market, however, it will add to its profit even
if the price is lower than in domestic market, because the negative effect on the price of existing
sales will fall on the other firm, not on itself. So each firm has an incentive to "raid" the other
market, selling a few units at a price that is lower than the home market, but still above marginal
cost ( krugman p.146). Thus trade between the two countries emerges but in a way that is unclear if
it is beneficial to our domestic economy. To explain how dumping affects trade, let's look at its
mathematical structure given by Professor Steve Beckman from University of Colorado at Denver.
Firms with monopoly power have marginal revenue MR = P + P'Q where P' is the slope of the
demand curve, the change in the price divided by the change in quantity sold "dP/dQ". All firms
profit maximize by choosing output such that marginal cost equals marginal revenue which is
MR=MC=P + P'Q. So, the firm's markup over price is P'Q = P–MC. Monopoly power is commonly
defined as (P'Q)/P = (P–MC)/P or the percentage markup over cost (Beckman). Professor Beckman
reasoned that

Sherman Antitrust Act : A Critical And Necessary Statute
SHERMAN ANTITRUST ACT
I claim that the Sherman Antitrust Act is a critical and necessary statute that gradually caused
significant changes in business practices in order to ensure a competitive free market system
essential for long term growth of the economy, although it faced criticisms for sacrificing economic
efficiency. This fundamental statute continues to notably shape the economic landscape even today,
albeit being more than 100 years old.
The act contains three sections. The first section renders every contract, trust and conspiracy in
restraint of interstate and foreign trade illegal (Dana 1903). The second section effectively penalizes
everyone engaged in monopolizing any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or
with a foreign nation. The third section extends the first section to include U.S. territories and the
District of Columbia. Prior to the enactment of this act several states within the United States had
passed similar laws for intrastate businesses. However, the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was the
first measure passed by the U.S. Congress to prohibit trusts and regulate interstate commerce
(Initiative).
The opponents of the act claim that it made the economy less efficient. Bradley (1990) asserts that
the Sherman Act discouraged scale economies that promoted lower costs and prices, penalized
successful market entrepreneurship, and rewarded the political entrepreneurship of less–efficient
business rivals. Others such as Comanor (1995)

European Competition Law And Policy
This essay will analyse European competition law and policy to ascertain the values and
characteristics that serve as its foundation. First, this essay will give a brief outline of competition
and the significance of competition law and policy. Subsequently, this essay will give an explanation
of the values behind European competition law and policy, which are consumer welfare, economic
efficiency and economic freedom. The values will incorporate Articles 101 and 102 TFEU along
with reference to the Chicago school of competition analysis and ordoliberalism.
Competition occurs in a free market economy where firms will endeavour to achieve business
objectives which adapt according to interactions with consumers. These objectives are profits, sales
or market share. Competition is essential for a properly functioning market as firms will be placed
under competitive pressure to provide consumers with a comprehensive choice of goods and
services at the most favourable prices. In a free market economy, government regulations or
restrictions are not applied in this economic system. Instead, it is determined by supply and demand
which directs the production of goods and services. The premise of a free market is competition
between firms to enable increased consumer welfare while promoting innovation and efficiency as
there will be lower prices and products of better quality. For competition to be effective in a free
market economy, it must be protected by competition law and

The Coco Cola Company Essay
The Coco–Cola company is a company that has been a part of the American culture and that have
could sustain its brand name and that of a strong competitor in the global beverage market for as
long as the company has been in existence. The Coco–Cola company was founded in 1886 in the
United States and quickly positioned itself as the leading soft drink in America. Its competitor
PepsiCo, has always been a strong contender and rival but has never risen to the level of out
producing Coco–Cola who has consistently dominated the beverage market in America for a greater
part of the early century. In their attempt to ensure that they remain the leading soft drink there was
a thrust to go global which they did by expanding their market in almost every country around the
world. Their rival PepsiCo has had to diversify beyond the soft drink industry to include waters,
juices, teas and snacks to be able to sustain a viable and sustainable profitable revenue. As Coco–
Cola continue to expand in the global market, it quickly became a brand that was hard to beat
especially since most of it revenues came from the overseas market and this was not without it
challenges. It was not until after World War II that we begin to see the pendulum swing in the Cola
wars. PepsiCo strategically became a serious contender when it began to sell its product in larger
portions for the same price. By the 1960's PepsiCo became a more serious and strong contender for
the Coco–Cola company so much so

The Australian Competition And Consumer Commission (ACCC)
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is an administer of the competition
and Consumer Act (CCA) which is to prevent collusion among the firms and to prevent the
individual firm which break the market equilibrium with their market power. Well competitive
market would deliver efficiency costs, faster innovation, prevention of unduly concentrated markets,
business freedom, wealth distribution, and enhancement of international competitiveness. Therefore,
the ACCC is playing a crucial role in Australia, and their activities can be divided into four
categories; (1) the policies for anti–competitive conduct and anti–competitive practices, (2) the
mergers policy, (3) the consumer protection policy, and (4) four pillars policy. ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The economics of supply and demand suggest that output restriction will increase demand which in
turn will increase prices. Consequently, output restriction can affect prices in much the same way as
price fixing. Those four forms of cartel conduct exist when the individuals or businesses agree to act
together for competition fairly and maintain profits. Moreover, there are other anti–competitive
practices such as boycotts and misuse of market power. A boycott is an agreement between two or
more parties not to deal with a third party, or to do so only upon certain terms. On the other hand,
misuse of market power is the individuals or businesses who use their market power for the purpose
of eliminating or substantially damaging a competitor or make barriers to enter into the market. The
ACCC educates consumers and businesses as to their right and responsibilities under the CCA.
(2) To prevent substantial lessening and dominance of competition, the CCA prohibits mergers when
that would have the effect, or be likely to have the effect. One of the main ways in which mergers
can lessen competition in through unilateral effects. The unilateral effects which means the merged
firms' unilateral market power is increased and it leads to remove or weaken competition. In
determining whether unilateral effects arise and whether they are to lessen the competition, the
ACCC considers all of the merger functions under in s50

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Anti Dumping
The objective of the competition Act as stated in its Preamble is –
"..to prevent practices having adverse effect on competition, to promote and sustain competition in
markets, to protect the interests of consumers and to ensure freedom of trade carried on by other
participants in market, in India."
According to the Haberler , Dumping is defined as "the sale of goods abroad at a price which is
lower than the selling price of the same goods at the same time in the same circumstances at home,
taking account of differences in transport costs." It is a pricing practice in which a firm charges a
lower price for the goods which are exported abroad, than it does for the same goods sold
domestically. Dumping can only be practiced at the places where there is an imperfect ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Consumer gets the imported products at cheaper rates than that of domestic market. The
disadvantages of the anti–dumping are such that the domestic industries who are producing goods
and selling in their country could not make it to profit maximization because the buyers of the
country are purchasing the dumped goods which are available at cheaper rates and the demand of
goods in the domestic market is very low, this leads to the closure of those domestic industries.
Some experts opine that such disadvantages can be overcome by making it mandatory to apply "a
public interest clause" to antidumping. The Indian legal system specifies a limit for the levy of anti–
dumping duty and it should not exceed dumping margin. These duties are on the discretion on the
country or the exporters. Small countries like Taiwan do not have separate anti–dumping laws but
these countries take some anti–dumping measures like in Taiwan Article 46 of Custom Law, 1967
empowers Custom Tariff Commission (CTC) and International Trade Commission (ITC) to handle
anti–dumping

The Distinction Between Per-Se Illegality And The Rule Of...
Per–se illegality and the rule of reason are two approached commonly used to evaluate the legality
of agreements under competition law. The distinction between per se illegality and the rule of reason
is fundamental in the U.S. for the application of Section 1 of the Sherman Act , and has been
adopted in other jurisdictions. A per se violation requires no further inquiry into the actual effects of
the practice on the market or the intention of individuals engaged in the practice. By contrast, under
the rule of reason, in addition to proving the existence of the alleged conduct, its anti–competitive
effects need to be shown to outweigh any alleged pro–competitive effects. The application of per–se
rule was considered appropriate in those cases

EU Merger Control Essay
CONTENTS I. Introduction 2 II. Substantive test – New test for the assessment of concentrations 3
1. The dominance test and the substantial lessen of competition (SLC) 4 2. The Green Paper 6 3.
The Significant impediment to effective competition (SIEC test) 7 CRITICAL APPROACH TO EU
MERGER CONTROL SINCE THE ADOPTION OF REGULATION 139/2004 I. Introduction In
2004 Reg.139/2004 replaced the existing 4064/89 Merger Control Regulation, thus marking a
milestone in EU merger control. The new regulation provided for the implementation of a new kind
of substantive test as well as certain procedural changes. Compared to its practice prior to the
defeats in the General Court in 2002, which was characterized by an interventionist ... Show more
More explicitly, the importance given to efficiencies as a defence to otherwise problematic mergers,
the creation of the office of the chief economist, the guidelines regarding horizontal mergers, and
more importantly the introduction of the new 'significant impediment of effective competition test'
(SIEC) are the main indicators of the shift in merger policy. The introduction of the new substantive
test based on the concept of 'significant impediment of effective competition' is the most important
aspect of the competition policy revision. The wording of the Regulation 4064/89 implied that the
merger review process involved a two–stage test. The second element of the test, the impediment of
effective competition, was rarely applied in practice because it was presumed to result only from the
creation or strengthening of a dominant position. That was the main criticism regarding the old
dominance test, because in effect, the dominance test allowed mergers resulting in lessening of
competition without the creation of a dominant position to go un–challenged. Under the new rule,
dominance is only an example for a significant impediment of effective competition, and thus proof
of dominance is no longer a necessary condition in order for the Commission to challenge a merger.
This dissertation focuses on the most significant developments introduced by Reg.139/2004. More
particularly it will concentrate on the revised substantive test

Antitrust Laws Research Paper
The purpose of antitrust laws is to both promote and protect competition. They aren't designed to go
after big companies simply because they are bigger or more successful than others in their industry.
They aren't anti–market or anti–business. They are intended to be just the opposite, in fact. They are
meant to promote successful market economics through the assurance of healthy competition while
keeping abuses of the system in check that could overrun the market.
The name came from the specific situation that inspired their inception: checking the abuses of the
huge "trusts" that emerged in the late 19th century. The massive trusts controlled or very nearly
controlled entire markets in major areas (i.e. steel, petroleum, rail transport,

Was Singapore correct to exclude vertical restraints from...
Was Singapore correct to exclude vertical restraints from the section 34 prohibition?
Introduction The Competition Act in Singapore is a relatively young piece of legislation.
Substantive provisions prohibiting anti–competitive acts and conduct, in the form of sections 34 and
47, only came into effect as recent as 1st January 2006. The Competition Act was "largely modelled
on the UK's Competition Act 1998 " , which was in turn modelled after European competition law
contained in the Treaty establishing the European Community . Several amendments have however
been made to take into account Singapore's "specific economic characteristics and requirements, in
particular, the fact that we are a small open economy". One significant departure ... Show more
Instead the European Commission ("EC") has adopted a block exemption on vertical agreement and
concerted practices ("EU Block Exemption"), in the form of Regulation 330/2010. Amongst the
various requirements that must be met to fall under the EU Block Exemption, two key requirements
in particular are that the market share of both parties must not exceed 30 percent , and the agreement
must not contain any hardcore restrictions, such as fixed or minimum resale prices . This essay will
first examine the benefits and detriments vertical agreements may have on competition. The reasons
for and against adopting a blanket exclusion of vertical agreements from the section 34 prohibition
will then be examined to show why such a blanket exemption should not be adopted in Singapore.
Vertical agreements: Possible benefits and detriments
Pro–competitive effects
Both the Competition Commission of Singapore ("CCS") and the EC recognise that vertical
restraints can have pro–competitive effects , "especially if there is effective competition at both the
upstream and downstream levels." Benefits include the promotion of efficiencies, non–price
competition, investment and innovation, and the development of new markets.
The EC has identified several ways in which vertical restraints can achieve efficiencies or help to
develop new markets. Amongst other benefits,

Microsoft: An Examination of Monopolies
Microsoft: An Examination of Monopolies Introduction This paper examines the nature of
monopolies and the anti–trust policies developed by the government to discourage them. It
specifically considers Microsoft and the case brought against it by the Federal government to
prevent its becoming a software monopoly. In many cases, the government is justified in pursuing
such anti–monopoly policies to protect competition and by extension the consumer. There are some
instances, however, when allowing certain monopolies ensures constant supply, efficient production,
and consistent regulation of products vital to the public good. The Microsoft Anti–Trust Case In
1998, the U.S. Department of Justice filed suit against Microsoft, claiming that the software
company was violating the Sherman Antitrust Act and the terms of a previous settlement by
bundling its Internet Explorer browser application with its Windows operating system. The Sherman
Anti–Trust Act was passed in 1890 in an effort to prevent monopolies that would threaten
competition in the marketplace and would eventually lead to extortionary prices for consumers. The
Act restricts companies from any practices that artificially create a monopoly by barring competitors
from entering the market. The government's case against Microsoft rested on a particular definition
of monopoly. Monopolies can occur in several ways. A pure monopoly, where only one company
offers a product for which there are no viable substitutes,

Economy
Introduction
The legislation process of Anti–Monopoly Law has been indeed a long journey. The new AML is a
tremendous leap forward for China, bringing China into the modern world of antitrust and
competition law. The law, which aims to prevent dominance of any one company, was first proposed
in 1994. But its pace was slow until 6 years later because of pressure from big state–owned
companies and multinationals that had just started doing business in China. It wasn't until 2001,
when China joined the World Trade Organization, did the process accelerate. In August 2007, the
law was finally passed by the National People's Congress. Although the measure compromised with
state–owned enterprises, which dominate industry, people tend to believe ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In addition, market dominance will be presumed to exist in the following cases (although this
presumption can be rebutted by evidence to the contrary): * if the operator has a market share of at
least 50 per cent; * if the joint market share of two operators accounts for at least two–thirds of the
relevant market; or * if the joint market share of three operators accounts for at least three–quarters
of the relevant market. * The monopolistic practice * The definition monopolistic competition is
firms which in effect hold a monopoly over their products, in that the firm is able to influence the
market price of its product by altering the rate of production. Monopolistic competitive firms
produce products that are not perfect substitutes or are at least perceived to be different to all other
brands products. Unlike in perfect competition, the monopolistic competitive firm does not produce
at the lowest possible average total cost. Instead, the firm produces at an inefficient output level,
reaping more in additional revenue than it incurs in additional cost versus the efficient output level.
There are several kinds of monopolistic practice as follow * Dumping can refer to any kind of
predatory pricing. However, the word is now generally used only in the context of international
trade law, where dumping is defined as the act of a manufacturer in one country exporting a product
to another country at a

The Effects Of Monopoly On Economic Development
Discuss the effects of monopoly on economic development. Is monopoly legal in your country? If
so, give three examples. If not, what are the actions of the government that have been taken to
prevent monopoly?
A Monopoly power as study showcases is when a firm has monopoly power it will engage itself a
little competition. Which also means that a monopoly is a price maker and its demand curve will be
inelastic. If Monopoly set to increase prices demand, it would only fall by a small percentage.
According to Pettinger, R. (2013), a monopoly is likely to cause the following effects in the
economy development as stated below:
i. Monopoly would increase price and decline consumer surplus, in that case, demand is will be
inelastic. By so doing, the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Monopoly will cause allocative inefficiency by introducing higher prices and less choice for
consumers. vi. A situation where monopolies get too high, they may experience what we call
diseconomies of scale. vii. Monopolies can use their monopoly power to achieve a goal by paying
lower prices to their suppliers. For examples, A Supermarkets will pay low prices to farmers since
the farmers do not have any other choice than to sell their products.
The effects of monopoly on economic development can also be seen from another aspect where we
have Price exceeding Marginal Cost, Price exceeding lowest Average Total Cost. This results to an
efficiency loss (dead weight loss) where we have sum of consumer surplus plus producer surplus is
less than maximum. It can be viewed as a "private tax" on consumers since the higher price will
generates higher economic profit that is distributed amongst shareholders of the company, who are
mostly from high–income groups. Monopoly owner's benefit at the expense of the consumers, since
owners have more income than the consumers, monopoly increases gap between rich and poor. For
example, when a buyer is richer than owners of the monopoly, then income transfer from consumers
to owners may decrease income

Taking a Look at Vertex
Vertex claims the inventory costs of VLite are high, therefore tying practice is required to enhance
sales of VLite. It is indisputable that the Commission recognizes pro–competitive effects of tying,
such as lowering manufacturing or distribution costs by economies of scale, which is found to be
important in this industry. According to para. 30 of the Guidance, Vertex has to prove that the tying
is indispensible to achieve the same efficiencies. Also, following Hilti Vertex needs to show that it
has taken other actions if possible in order to lower the inventory costs. Given such a high standard
of proof, it is very likely that Vertex would be found violated the Article 102(d) by contractual tying.
1. Conditional Rebate Scheme
Vertex introduced standardized and individualized target rebates to distributors in the Western
Europe. Target rebates may not be problematic if they are indeed genuine quantity–based, but a
target rebate may be found abusive if it limits the buyer's freedom to choose (Michelin I).
Nonetheless, rebate schemes may result in suction effect – the dominant firm lowers the average
price of its products and captures contestable sales which the firm was unable to capture before.
Vertex offered two largest distributors in the market rolled–back target rebates. Under this scheme,
rebates were applied to the total turnover previously realized over a certain period. The court has
been harsh in treating rebates without fully considering the theory of harm of

International Bribery Regulation And The Bribery Act 2010
2.4 International Bribery Regulation and the Bribery Act 2010
2.4.1 Development of National and Transnational Ethics Regulations
The development of national and international bribery legislation and regulation has been a slow
process spanning many centuries, stemming from the recognition of Piracy as the first and true
international crime (Duhaime's Law Dictionary, 2015). Although wide agreement exists on the
detrimental impacts of bribery and corrupt practices, many individual countries and transnational
industries (including that of civil engineering) fear implementation of tough anti–bribery legislation
will cause unfair competitive disadvantages compared to their counterparts from countries where
foreign bribery is not criminalised (OECD Observer, 2012).
The first major push to implement anti–bribery legislation was taken by the United States with the
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) 1977; this law made it illegal for certain classes of U.S.
persons to make payments to foreign government officials to assist in obtaining or retaining business
(U.S. Department of Justice, 2015). The broader development of ethics based law and regulation has
developed primarily throughout the 20th century; particularly post 1950 when most of the worlds
Inter Governmental Organisations (IGOs) had been established. Some of the most important IGOs
in this area include the United Nations (UN), World Bank, World Economic Forum (WEF) and
Organisations for Economic Co–operations and

The Pros And Cons Of Intellectual Property Law
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) defines anti–competitive
practices as the many ways firms restrict inter–firm competition to maintain or to increase their
relative market position and profits without necessarily providing goods and services at a lower
price or at a higher quality. The American Federal Trade Commission states that anti–competitive
practices include activities such as price fixing, group boycotts and exclusionary exclusive dealings.
These activities are generally grouped as agreements between competitors (horizontal conduct) and
monopolization (single firm conduct).
In order to explore the extent to which exercise of intellectual property rights may be considered
anti–competitive, the definition must ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The cause of the tensions has been traced to the objectives of both the laws. In definition, IPR gives
the owners an exclusive right to behave in a particular way, when competition law does everything
in its power to keep the markets open. So then tension rises at which point does IPR become
harmful and competition law should intervene and override IPR?
Lionel Bentley and Brad Sherman have, in their book; "Intellectual Property Law" acknowledged
that indeed there is tension between competition law and intellectual property law. While discussing
the effect of competition law on the exploitation of copyright , they state that a copyright entitles an
owner to use the property in a manner which he or she so wishes and that the copyright owner
cannot be compelled to apply their rights in a particular manner. This is the exclusivity of a right.
They, however, acknowledge that there are circumstances in which competition law may require a
property owner to make available the right for use by the public. They state that operators in
dominant positions have a special responsibility not to allow their conduct to impair

Essay on Microsoft Manages Legal and Ethical Issues
Microsoft Manages Legal and Ethical Issues
S. Nevarez
Olympic College
OLRM 202: Introduction to Organizational Ethics
Microsoft is the global leader in computer software, and well recognized in the field of corporate
social responsibility and philanthropy. However, since 1990 the computing giant has been plagued
by allegations of antitrust violations and monopolistic, non–competitive business practices. By
answering the three questions posed in Part 5, Case 7 of Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making
and Cases; this review will address how such a legal and ethical dichotomy is possible, and how the
issues relate to one another in terms of corporate reputation.
1. What unique aspects of the software industry created the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
2. Discuss the role of Microsoft's leadership and corporate culture in generating a large volume of
ethical and legal issues.
In the opening paragraph of a letter to employees regarding Business Conduct, Steven A Ballimer,
Microsoft CEO writes:
"Microsoft aspires to be a great company, and our success depends on you. It depends on people
who innovate and are committed to growing our business responsibly. People who dedicate
themselves to really satisfying customers, helping partners, and improving the communities in
which we do business. People who are accountable for achieving big, bold goals with unwavering
integrity. People who are leaders, who appreciate that to be truly great, we must continually strive to
do better ourselves and help others improve."
In addition to a socially responsible code of conduct, community–focused initiatives, and the
creation of over 15 million Internet Technology jobs worldwide, Microsoft founder Bill Gates is
head of the single largest philanthropic organization in the world: the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation, with an endowment of 37.1 billion dollars.
Even with this publicly ethical image, Microsoft has been mired in litigation since 1990, and has
paid billions of dollars in legal settlements and fees to address allegations of anti–competitive
business practices. Hollywood even jumped on the bandwagon with the 2001

The World Trade Organization ( Wto )
In international economy, trade agreement was made to gain fairness between the involved
countries. Thus, the World Trade Organization (WTO) is established to protect these agreements and
serves consequences for those who violate the agreement. Dumping is one of the examples of
violation of the agreements. WTO defined dumping as imported goods in the market of the
importing country with price less than its normal value (Trewin&Bosworth 1999, p.134). From one
perspective, to protect local producers from dumping, the government imposes anti–dumping
measures on imported goods. From another perspective, the anti–dumping measures will cause less
incentive for local producers to produce efficiently; thus, it is important to avoid using ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Exporters restricting their products to enter the market would decrease the total supply of the
product in the market and later causes shortage in the market due to the inability of the local
producers to meet the demand from consumers. Hence, the market can be considered as imperfect
market due to the existence of inefficiency in the market. It is important to note that if the local
producers were able to meet with the demand, they would be able to gain profit maximization and
achieve economies of scale. It is also stated in Dhar and Conway's study (1994) that when dumping–
sector profits increases, other sector profits such as wages would also increase, thus implicating that
dumping–sector profits have relations to other sector profits. Imposing anti–dumping measure
would result the opposite. Knowing that the anti–dumping measure would increase the price of the
imported goods, the exporting country would cut off their cost of production by cutting off their
labors, thus increasing the unemployment rate of the exporting country. Trewin and Bosworth (1999,
p.136) gave an example of a case, which it took in 1999, Australian manufacturer of A4 copy paper
had claimed that Indonesia should be treated as an unsuitable market for assessment of 'normal
values' because at that time, Indonesia was facing a major devaluation

Research Paper_Week3
LASHAUN BERRY WEEK 3–RESEARCH PAPER INTRO TO BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY
July 27, 2014 The United States has several laws that are intended to further fair, balanced, and
competitive business practices. Do you think that such laws are effective? If so, why? If not, why
not? Be sure to provide evidence to support your position one way or the other. There are several
laws in the United States that are chosen to be fair, balances, and competitive for businesses. With
the control measures, the laws has been effective to ensure businesses are ran fair. But when the
legislation and/or regulations have a determining factor of not knowing if it's going to be successful
or note, we are unsure. Amongst the fact that when laws are being ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Laws and Regulations are not easily defined when antitrust laws are violates. There are many
versions and analysis which often leads to agree to disagree. With public support, antitrust laws can
be enforced and effective but with ignorance and indifference, it can become weak. In conclusion,
whether an entrepreneur or consumer, if behavior is encountered in a business environment that
appears to violate laws, contact your local enforcement agencies. Whether shopping as a consumer
in a grocery store, buying a home on uploading software, laws play a big role in ensuring consumers
are benefiting from all competitive prices and good quality goods and services. All these goals are
accomplished with promoting competition and preventing competitive business practices. However
with a recent act passed by the government maybe it doesn't go far enough in preventing businesses
and its practices from protecting consumers. But with implementation, it's the ensurance of what
businesses ultimately do o in the best interests of the American people. REFERENCES Federal
Trade Commission. (n.d.). Retrieved from The Antitrust Laws: http://www.ftc.gov/tips–
advice/competition–guidance/guide–antitrust–laws/antitrust–laws Justice, U. D. (2008, 12 03).
Sherman Anti–Trust Act of 1890. Retrieved from Society for Human Resource Management:

Coles Vs Woolworths
The results above illustrate significant barriers of entry that Coles and Woolworths have established
as they have grown in economies of scale, impacting the price of the local retailers expressed in
Tables 3,4,5,6. Regarding store location, Harris Farm, Mario's Market and IGA are struggling tor
remain competitive within the industry. Financially, they are expressing difficulties due to the high
costs of having a prime location in the grocery industry. The retailers regarded this to be a
significant barrier of their price making ability. Regarding advertisement costs, local retailers cannot
share their products with the public due to the high opportunity costs as it would cause the capital of
a business to reduce and thus not benefit from more affordable alternatives. Where as the duopoly
heavily practices advertisement strategies, surpassing the local retailers in this section due to high
amounts of available capital gained from abnormal profits in the long–run. This results in the
consumers perceiving the duopolies fruit and vegetable as more essential and different as well
alerting them of the low prices available to them. This forces retailers, to lower their prices to
maintain competitive. Thus advertisement being a present barrier. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For example, Woolworths in 2011 set a kg of bananas as low as $1. These restrictive practices
established the duopoly in a stronger position to start a price war, that forced the local retailers to
lower their prices significantly to remain competitive. However, if the duopoly were to take the
price war to extreme measure and hence illegal, they can lower their prices to a loss–making ability
and thus eventually drive the local retailers out of the industry, thus being an existing barrier of

Csr And Ethical Errors : Violation Of The Clean Air Act (...
CSR and Ethical Errors: Environmental: Violation of the Clean Air Act (CAA) In the year 2005, The
United States had filed a complaint against the DaimlerChrysler Corporation on behalf of the
Environmental Protection Agency, stating that, Chrysler violated the Clean Air Act by failing to
properly disclose defective catalytic converters on approximately 1.5 million Jeep and Dodge
vehicles for model years 1996 through 2001. The catalytic converters were considered defective
because a fair chunk of them experienced mechanical erosion, this causes the catalyst substrate
material to detach from the catalyst shell, causing it to rattle around inside the shell and break into
pieces. When these pieces get blow out from the car's tailpipe, it leaves behind an empty catalyst
shell resulting in a gross emitting vehicle. Also, a good number of vehicles were found to have
defective on–board diagnostics (OBD) systems that failed to detect the deteriorated or empty
catalyst converters. When an emission–related defect is found to affect 25 or more vehicles or
engines of the same model year in newly manufactured motor vehicles, the manufacturer is required
to file an emission defect information report with the United States Environmental Protection
Agency not more than 15 working days after such emission–related defects are reported. The
company paid $90 million as settlement charges; the settlement involved extended warranties for the
vehicles with defective catalytic converters and

The Antitrust Case Against Microsoft Essay
The U.S. government charged that Microsoft had violated antitrust law. Microsoft disagreed. Do you
agree with the U.S. government, or with Microsoft? In answering this question, you may wish to
address two issues. Was Microsoft a monopoly? Did it use its monopoly to compete unfairly against
other companies?
Commencing in 1990, Microsoft was investigated and then charged with violation of the Sherman
Antitrust Act which governs United States businesses. The company was determined to be a
monopoly, and one which used anti–competitive practices to keep its leading edge on the market. As
would most any organization on the receiving end of the allegations, Microsoft did not agree with
the charges and sought to defend its business ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
First, Microsoft 'encouraged' Compaq, Apple, and other computer manufacturers to promote only
Internet Explorer, and to make that the default browser on their PC. This encouragement came in the
way of threats to eliminate or delay licensing of operating systems, providing the browser for free to
internet access providers, and bundling the software with the operating system under the guise of
interactive ease for the consumer. This manipulation led to an increase in the browser's sales by 45
to 50%, which paralleled the decline Netscape experienced in their market sales in 1998.6
Microsoft's defense included a deposition of the company's Chairman, Bill Gates, during which he
appeared to be argumentative, evasive, and unresponsive. Evidence provided on behalf of the
organization included videotapes of ways in which the company had supposedly eliminated the
technical glitches that prevented users from deleting Internet Explorer and loading Netscape's
Navigator instead. These tapes were questioned and scrutinized by the government and found to be
"inaccurate".7 It seemed to me that the information the company brought forth as its defense was
questionable and excusatory, rather than defensible and explanatory.
Examine the various remedies possible in this case. In light of the strength of the various parties'
positions in the case, what remedy would you advocate, and why?
The case against

The For Efficient Distribution Of The European Commission...

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to The For Efficient Distribution Of The European Commission...

Similar to The For Efficient Distribution Of The European Commission... (13)

More from Carla Jardine

More from Carla Jardine (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The For Efficient Distribution Of The European Commission...