Kin Country Syndrome

Kin Country Syndrome
1. Kin–Country Syndrome : U.S Attitudes Towards The Palestinian–Israeli Conflict. Basically the
state or group of people who involving in a war with people from another civilization attempt to
seek out support from others who have the same or similar civilization with them. This is defined as
Kin–Country syndrome. Kin–country syndrome was emerged during post cold war such as during
the conflict in the Gulf war and the Bosnian–Serbs war. None of these was a full–scale war between
civilizations, but each involved some elements of civilizational rallying, which seemed to become
more important as the conflict continued and which may provide a foretaste of the future . The kin–
country syndrome will allow nations to pull on emotional ties to gain assistance . H. D. S. Greenway
has ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Why the US Has the Most Pro–Israel Foreign Policy in the World." Vox. Last modified 24, 2012.
http://www.vox.com/2014/7/24/5929705/us–israel–friends.
Chomsky, Noam, David Barsamian, and Arthur Naiman. How the World Works. [Berkeley, CA]:
Soft Skull Press, 2011.
Huntington, Samuel P. "The Clash of Civilizations?" Foreign Affairs 12, no. 3 (1993).
"Israel 'deeply Appreciates' U.S. Veto on UN Resolution Condemning Settlements – Haaretz.com."
Haaretz.com. Last modified February 19, 2011. http://www.haaretz.com/israel–news/israel–deeply–
appreciates–u–s–veto–on–un–resolution–condemning–settlements–1.344390.
"Norms & Ideas in Intl Relations – Realist Constructivism." Norms & Ideas in Intl Relations –
Home. Accessed October 24, 2016. https://utnorms.wikispaces.com/Realist+Constructivism.
Nossal, Kim R. "Huntington's "Kin Country" Thesis –– Kim Richard Nossal." POST: POST Server
at Queen's. Accessed October 25, 2016. http://post.queensu.ca/~nossalk/papers/kincountry.html.
"Roots of the U.S.–Israel Relationship | Jewish Virtual Library." Home | Jewish Virtual Library.
Accessed October 25, 2016.
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Compare And Contrast Huntington And Fukuyama
Samuel Huntington and Francis Fukuyama
The Berlin Wall was about to fall, the Soviet Union was collapsing, and the world was clamoring for
the consumerist boom in an orgy of free–market handful experience, international politics began
travelling out of a Westernized phase, and the relation between the West and the rest began to
crystallize and contest.
Huntington and Fukuyama both provide ground–breaking paradigms that explain the complexities
of an embryonic post–Cold War world. Their distinct ideologies are a result of their respective false
consciousness which, stems from particular political ideas embodying different social interests.
Huntington peddles a culturalist thesis whilst Fukuyama embodies a framework of universalization
of western liberal democracy in the socio–cultural evolution to the end point of human governance.
Fukuyama presented his argument in 1992, and his teacher responded in 1993 with his theory, 'The
clash of civilizations'. Not only do their theories differ from one another, but we see a stark
difference in their writing style as well. Huntington refers to his thesis as a hypothesis, indicating an
experiment rather than a mere opinion, which can ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is clearly indicating how Fukuyama is an optimistic neo–liberal who favors freedom and
democratic features and procedures. Fukuyama was careful to stress that he was not implying that
contestation isn't a probability, or that there would be no countries left in the world that did not
conform to the liberal democratic model. "At the end of history," he wrote, "it is not necessary that
all societies become successful liberal societies, merely that they end their ideological pretensions of
representing different and higher forms of human society." (Fukuyama,

9/11 Paradigms
Q: Did 9/11 create a new paradigm for the understanding of international politics?
Thesis statement
The 11th of September 2001 drew attention across the world as horrifying images appeared through
the media of terrorists using hijacked commercial jets as weapons to destroy the World Trade Center
twin towers in the United States of America, reaping thousands of casualties of innocent US
civilians. This event created a number of new and deeply complex paradigms determining how
states and individuals understand international politics. The most notable change in these paradigms
is a shift from conflict between clearly defined nation states to what was hypothesised as a 'clash of
civilizations' in Samuel P. Huntington's 1996 book on the future ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Huntington that hypothesised a new post–Cold War world order. Prior to the end of the Cold War,
societies were divided by ideological differences such as the struggle between democracy and
communism. Huntington's primary thesis argues, "The most important distinctions among peoples
are [no longer] ideological, political or economic. They are cultural." Huntington makes a very
persuasive argument as to how new patterns of conflict will occur along the boundaries of different
cultures and patterns of cohesion will be found within the cultural boundaries. The book goes into
extensive detail of how world systems between civilizations, which he divides by culture into 7
main global civilizations, are impacted on an international relations scale by this changing nature of
conflict. He focuses a great deal on the West's ability to maintain military superiority through the
nonproliferation of emerging powers. In particular relation to 9/11 he focuses on the emerging
influence of Islamic culture (which he classifies as it's own civilization) being quintessential in the
emerging new global conflict arisen out of hundreds of years of conflict, military and cultural,
between Western civilization and Islamic civilization. The clear limitation of this work is that it is
based on his own perception of history and is purely a hypothesis, however it clearly has a great
degree of validity to it as we have already seen through the last decade in the rise of terrorism as the
new global conflict. This book will assist my essay writing particularly in analysing how 9/11
marked the beginning of a new era of global conflict between powers larger than nation states alone,
and thus how this has created increasingly complex paradigms of unprecedented effects on
international

Political Development And Political Decay By Samuel P....
In the article, "Political Development and Political Decay," Samuel P. Huntington looks at the
importance of modernization, institutionalization, and mobilization in political development. He
discusses the many definitions of "political development" and purposefully distinguishes it from
modernization. Instead, he defines political development as the activities of political institutions.
Huntington then addresses the affect political mobilization has on the deterioration of political
institutions, and the ways in which institutions can develop. Modernization is often attributed as an
aspect of political development, but Huntington believes otherwise and he gives several reasons for
why this is. First, associating political development ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He identifies two reasons why political development is viewed as a "one–way concept". First,
because modernization is an irreversible process, it is clear why some may believe political
development is also irreversible, considering that the two concepts are often viewed as
interconnected. Secondly, an optimistic view of progress may "exclude political decay as a possible
concept" (392). In Huntington's view, studying both political development and political decay will
help us better understand the developing world. Next, Huntington argues that political
institutionalization should play a greater role when writing about political development.
Institutionalization can be a characteristic of any political system, it can be clearly defined and
measured, and it is a reversible process. As defined by Huntington, political development is "the
institutionalization of political organizations and procedures" (393). Different degrees of
institutionalization can be applied to organizations based on their their adaptability or rigidity,
complexity or simplicity, autonomy or subordination, and coherence or disunity. An organization
that is more adaptable to changes has a greater level of institutionalization. An older organization––
which has had more time to adjust to its successes and failures––is more likely to have a higher level
of institutionalization than a younger organization, which is more likely to be rigid and less
adaptable. In addition, an organization that has

Understanding of Identity in Samuel P. Huntington's Clash...
The word "identity" inspired many writers in our contemporary world, toarticulate their ideas and
state their suggestions in a way to find a precise definition for such a word, especially where the
globalization has become a fact which produces with it many effectual consequences. Some writers
had linked Identity with the original culture to which a person may belong, others dealt with it as a
changing factor transformed according to every ones status,however a third category characterized
the Identity from another angel in view of religious or ideological background. Huntington being
one of the leading writers in this sphere has imagined a future world witnesses a clash of
civilizations.According to his categorizationfrom a cultural perspective however; the world shall be
divided into eight civilizations. This essay shall shed a light into the different understandings of
theidentity and culture as in relation to Islam and the West having reference to different arguments
and visions presented in the following scholarly sources.
Samuel P. Huntington in his book " The Clash of Civilizations"has predicted that the source of
conflict in the new world shall not be ideological or primarily economic, as the great divisions
among humankind and dominating source of conflict shall be cultural.Although nation states will
remain to be the most powerful actors in world affairs, yet the principal conflict of global politics
will occur between nations and groups of different

Samuel Huntington'sThe Clash Of Civilizations?
In the history of the world, times of war have always outnumbered times of peace. Numerous
causes, both known and unknown, have fueled this need for war between groups of people. As
'civilizations' or religions, there is no inherent ethic reason to declare full, complete, and unwavering
wars on one another. Instead, non–religious or cultural reasons such as the gathering or growth of
wealth and land lead to wars. Statements suggesting otherwise, such as Samuel Huntington's article
"The Clash of Civilizations?" should be treated as at best, a large misunderstanding, and at worse
deliberate fearmongering. As stated by Edward W. Said on the article, The Clash of Ignorance, "In
fact, Huntington is an ideologist, someone who wants to make "civilizations" and "identities" into
what they are not: shut–down, sealed–off entities that have been purged of the myriad currents and
countercurrents that animate human history, and that over centuries have made it possible for that
history not only to contain wars of religion and imperial conquest but also to be one of exchange,
cross–fertilization and sharing.". Clearly put, the concept of a "Clash of Civilizations" does nothing
to explain the historical times of war and peace between Islam and Christianity.
To fully discredit the clash of civilizations between Muslims and Non–Muslims individually, we
should first undermine the concept not as a complete word, but in pieces. In order for there to be a
'Clash of Civilizations' between

In 1989, Francis Fukuyama published "the End of History?"...
In 1989, Francis Fukuyama published "the End of History?" on the National Interest. Throughout
the article, he attempted to account for the global changes in the post–Cold War era including the
ideological transformation of the Soviet Union by introducing a new idea of 'the end of history'. To
Fukuyama, this idea signified the main ground for the turbulence and the systematic reformation.
His argument that the history will no longer evolve has two main significations. First, the ideas or
ideologies humans developed throughout the history reached their end points. The victory of the
west meant that there was no other alternative ideology to substitute for liberal democracy. Second,
the western liberal democracy will be universalised as it ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Therefore, Fukuyama tries to answer this question by introducing the "search for recognition."
(Fukuyama, 1993) Fukuyama utilises concepts such as 'megalothymia' and 'isothymia' which root
from a Greek word, 'thymos.' (1993, p. 182) The former refers to a desire to be recognised by having
a superior power or ability whereas the latter refers to the same but by maintaining the equal power
or status as others. He states that other than the basic needs of human, there is the quest for
recognition that work as a source of motivation. The reason why the desire for domination arises is
because the mankind wants to satisfy the desire for recognition. Thus, the modern society is a by–
product of history driven by the search for recognition, and that is how modern capitalism came into
existence. (Fukuyama, 1993) If so, the question of why capitalist society must conclude into liberal
democratic political system remains, and this is the core of Fukuyama's thesis. The rationale behind
this is that liberal democracy is the only ideology that satisfies the desire to be recognised. The
history of mankind started off from the desire to dominate of 'megalothymia', and ended in the state
of 'isothymia' when liberal democracy finally arrived. Hence, by satisfying the humanity's most
crucial desire, the chance of progress of social ideology will be seized, and the

The Clash Of Civilizations: The Clash Of Civilizations
On the other hand, defenders of Huntington might argue that his thesis predicted the instability
leading to the uprisings, and that his analysis of the Muslim Arab societies provided information of
some important aspects of the Arab Spring, such as causes and driving forces: search for identity;
Muslim political culture; affection and rejection towards the West; and Islam's central role.
This thesis aims to offer a more methodical examination of this debate, and thereby provides an
more dispassionate objective comprehensive answer as toto the relative relation and to the
explanatory power of an important global event, the Arab spring, in regards to one of some of the
most important contemporaneous IR debates, tThe clash of Civilizations. The answer that this thesis
provides ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Huntington's Clash of Civilizations
The clash of civilizations was one of the last significant works of Professor Samuel P. Huntington ,
after long many years of writing in the fields of international relations and political science.
Huntington wrote the Clash of civilization after he witnessed the end of the Cold War, and believed
that international relations after its end would change tremendously due to the war.
Huntington sought a new paradigm that would explain the new global map in a better way than that
of current existinged theories. Huntington was not alone in this attempt, since. otheroOther
intellectuals and statesmen have sought to figure out how global politics have changed, and would
change; which new systems and powers will come to play; what would be the driving forces behind
global phenomena and trends; and how will policies change.these changes should bring forth.
There was much controversy regarding those matters, particularly around about the origins of
conflict, the traditional role of nation states as the main actors in global affairs, and the nature of
relations between international actors in the era of

Fukyama V huntington Essay
Francis Fukuyama and Samuel Huntington are two of the most controversial and influential modern
political theorists of our times. Fukuyama's book, The End of History and the Last Man, and
Huntington's book, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, pose two very
conflicting theories on international relations. In this paper I will summarize and compare/contrast
the two theories. Both theories, written since the fall of communism and updated since the first gulf
war, have been widely read, taught, praised and criticized
The End of History and the Last Man is a book in which Francis Fukuyama argues the controversial
thesis that the end of history, a time when class distinctions no longer exist, believing them to be the
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To understand Fukuyama's theory one must look beyond the specific words. Fukuyama is not
claiming that history has or will end and that occurrences of history will cease to exist. He is saying
that democracy is such a perfect and Idealistic form of rule that no major change in political
philosophy can happen in the future. Historical occurrences will still exist, but they will be within
the realm of the current political philosophical thought. Fukuyama goes even further to prove his
point by showing that the new philosophies on government created since the oncoming of
democracy, (Communism, Socialism, etc.) have ultimately failed and democracy has prevailed in its
place.
In the Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Samuel Huntington argues that the
primary political actors in the 21st century will be civilizations and that the primary conflicts will be
conflicts between these civilizations rather then between nation states.
Huntington Writes:
"It is my hypothesis that the fundamental source of conflict in this new world will not be primarily
ideological or primarily economic. The great divisions among humankind and the dominating source
of conflict will be cultural. Nation states will remain the most powerful actors in world affairs, but
the principal conflicts of global politics will occur between nations and groups of different
civilizations. The clash of civilizations will dominate global politics. The fault lines between

The On The House Of Medici
By looking at the political history of major world powers, we are clearly aware of the events of
legitimation crises: the House of Medici was confronted by the people under the influence of
religious Savonarola; American Civil War emerged from a conflict of ideologies of the North and
the South; Southeast Asian countries went through unsuccessful and even destructive
decolonization; Communist China was challenged by large–scale protests after the East European
upheaval. It is definitely a serious task for rulers to maintain a good standing as not to be
overthrown, but various sources of crises made it hard for the authority to predict outcomes and plot
countermeasures. The Prince discusses the charm of pure princely power, without the addition of
morality; Huntington introduces the "political gap" caused by modernization; Nisbet warns the
public of an increasingly more centralized authority; De Jasay investigates the nature of repression
and consent. The research findings of the aforementioned authors elicit me to better comprehend
potential priorities of governments.
1)A government may push forward the process of institutionalization in line with economic
development.
2)A government need to understand the core interests of people to gain consent.
3)A government should be decisive and flexible when encountering adversaries.
Huntington, in his work, equates modernity with stability and modernization with chaos. He argues
that during the process of modernization, drastic

The End Of History
Post–World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union were the two poles of the bipolar world;
the two most powerful nations at that time. From a neorealist's point of view, bipolarity is the ideal
case scenario since both the superpowers will have fear of each other and hence there would be less
international conflicts. However, the Cold War failed to prove this point. The US (a capitalist state)
and the Soviet Union (a communist state) had conflicting beliefs about government and economics;
hence, the disagreements led to the Cold War. The Cold War is believed to have lasted from 1947–
1991, a span of 44 years with the Soviet Union eventually being dissolved. The war had long term
effects in the years to come and different political scientists ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Francis Fukuyama, another political scientist, reflected that human nature strives for supremacy and
recognition, which eventually leads to conflicts between different governances. Francis Fukuyama,
the author of the book, "The End of History", considered that humans tend to move their lives
towards an end point; which in post–Cold War scenario was to eliminate communism and assert
liberal democracy as the universal model of governance. After the Cold War, communism had been
overcome by democracy and hence, according to him, the history had come to an end. He also
believes that China has an efficient authoritarian centralized system with no constraint or checks and
balances. This system can outperform democracy in the short run because decisions can be made
quickly hence better for investment and growth. However, the US and Western Europe have lots of
checks and balances hence, decisions on impending plans cannot be made immediately. The
question now is which system is more sustainable going forward? He thinks that checks and
balances and democracy is superior in the long run because you need to have good leadership and
the right leaders for a liberal system to be implemented properly. After all, he believed that the only
form of government across the globe will eventually be liberal democracy. I consider Fukuyama's
deduction that we have reached the "End of History" as premature at this point in history. Former
British Prime–Minister, Margaret Thatcher, stated: "End of history? Beginning of nonsense." After
1990, since the end of Cold War, there have been several wars and genocides, 9/11 attacks, the
emergence of ISIS; all disproving Fukuyama's

Article by Bartley
In the article by Bartley, it looks at how the West should believe in itself a little bit more and they
should see how they are different. The article looks at communication and how it will insure that
democracy survives and it mediates our understanding of the world. The article also looks at the
"clash of civilizations" and how the conflicts will not be over resources but it will be over the
fundamental and often irreconcilable values. This will make the U.S. and the West on the defensive.
The article also talks about how there has been a lot of interest in cultural, ethnic and religious
values in the Islamic fundamentalism. The article looks at how people in the other countries are
being educated in the U.S. There is also a power of prosperity where Western values are becoming
an artifact of an exogenous civilization, but a lot of people believe that they are an artifact of
economic development itself. At a certain level of prosperity people want power and that the
economic development leads to demands for democracy and individual autonomy. The future is no
sure thing and it is all about the people. In the article by Wilson, it looks at the concept of American
Exceptionalism. The article talks about how we should embrace our values in the country and we
should be proud of who we are in the world system. The article looks at how we are truly different
and distinct. There are a couple of problems in our world which is the poor cannot get over certain
things and

The Clash of Civilizations Essay examples
Ernest Hemingway stated that, "In modern war ... you will die like a dog for no good reason"! Even
though that is true, experts have gone further by trying to find the "roots" and explain why conflicts
emerge in the first place. Two experts, Samuel P. Huntington and John R. Bowen, present two
different approaches towards the cause of conflicts in 21st century. Although there is a difference
between their approaches, both of them share the common believe that a conflict may occur when
one puts pressure on the other; but the reason why this pressure takes place, varies among the two
theories. In his article, "The Clash of Civilizations", Huntington points out that in the 21st century,
conflicts will not occur based on ideology of a state or ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When it comes to this case, according to Huntington, the Western are accused by the Eastern for
double standard, "one standard to their kin–countries and a different standard to others" (373). The
second key point that Huntington makes, is that the over–pressure of a Western towards the non–
Western creates allies between different cultures on the Eastern civilization. As he stated, "the divine
line is not always sharp", hence civilizations may go through a cultural meltdown and states may
overpass their traditional and religion values. But this overlap creates even deeper division in the
foreign affairs where there are only two sides: The Western and the Rest. This was clearly evident
with Arabian countries in the post Gulf War period, when they switched sides and adapted a Western
policy against Sadam, who preferred an Anti–Western policy. Moreover, the obstacles that are
created by the Western towards the non–Western, brings the non–Western civilization to a cross–
road, where they either join the Western civilization, or create alliances among other non–Western,
thus "competing with the West by developing their own economic, military and political power"
(376). For example, even though Japan is consider as an Eastern civilization, with a geographic
position near the Communist country – China, and feared from the Communist pressure – influence
that may occurred within Japan, managed to "establish a unique position for itself as an associate
member of the

Cp Snow The Two Cultures Analysis
The Two Cultures, which was originally a lecture by C.P. Snow, Shows the how Snow sees the split
of the Humanities and Sciences and how that it could harm the growth of the world. From what I
have gathered Snow believes that the world is run by those who are educated in the humanities and
even says that they are "behaving like a state whose power is rapidly declining". That those who are
in command are more worried about keeping afloat than trying to expand. Snow though also show
how much he supports the disciplines and wished for the two to begin to work together more. Snow
thought that if the sciences and humanities did not work together for progress it could lead to the
doom of not only England but the entirety of western civilization.

The Cold War Was Easy : Capitalism Vs. Communism
Introduction
The Cold War was easy: Capitalism vs. Communism, West vs. East, Good vs. Evil... however you
wanted to define it, the dichotomy was simple to understand. When the Soviet Union officially
dissolved in 1991, the New World Order was going to be a little more difficult to define, and to
comprehend. The first to try was Francis Fukuyama: With his essay entitled, "The End of History"
he declared "an unabashed victory of economic and political liberalism". The resulting, "triumph of
the West" was evidence that there was no "viable systematic alternatives to Western Liberalism."
Therefore, there was no "fundamental contradictions in human life that cannot be resolved in the
context of modern liberalism, that would be resolvable by ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Lastly, it is along the lines of these civilizations, of which seven or eight exist, that alliances will be
formed and wars will be fought.
Although many of us have used the words culture and civilization interchangeably, Huntington
spends a great deal of time differentiating between the two. Cultures have a commonality; ancestry,
religion, language, history, values, customs, and institutions. These commonalities will define
cultural groups; and the largest cultural group possible, at the broadest level, is a civilization.
"Culture is the common theme in almost every definition of civilization". The civilizations, as
identified by Huntington are Sinic [Chinese or Confusious], Japanese, Hindu, Islamic, Orthodox
[Russian], Western [Europe, North American, Australia, New Zealand], Latin American and
possibly African. And it is among these groups that share a "common interest and common values"
and have a "common culture or civilization" that will lead to more interdependence on members of
the same civilization and less dependent on the West. Huntington's theory is that the West has had
[at one time or another] a negative impact on every other civilization, and this has led to a decline of
power and influence around the world, especially the Islam civilization. Therefore he predicts, "the
fault lines between civilizations will be the battle lines of the future."
Critique
First and

Analysis Of Samuel Huntington 's The Clash Of The...
Samuel Huntington, the author of the clash of the civilisations believes that the World will
eventually divide in accordance with cultural lines, and not political lines. According to Huntington,
"the thriving East Asian and Muslim societies will soon challenge Western dominance, and the
United States being the World leader will need to reevaluate its policies on foreign invention and
domestic immigration to remain a major player." During the Cold War, the world was divided into
the First, Second and Third Worlds. Huntington views these ties as insignificant now and states that
the remaking of the World order will be based upon cultural similarity. The different thriving
civilisations according to him today are the Western civilisation comprising of North America and
Western Europe, the Muslim civilisation, the Orthodox Civilisation led by Russia, the Chinese
civilisation, the Hindu civilisation, the Japanese civilisation, the Latin American civilisation and the
African civilisation. Huntington's proposition of the division of the World according to cultural lines
has been backed by the use of various examples by him; examples of events that have taken place in
the past.
An example supporting Huntington's notion would the breaking up of Yugoslavia into six
independent states namely Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Macedonia and
Montenegro. This break up was caused due to ethnic and religious differences. It is also interesting
to point out that the Western

The West Vs. Reality
The West Versus Reality
Since the beginning of history, the rise and descent of civilizations has molded history influencing
what nations have become today. The approach of using a strong military and a dynamic economy
can be seen as template for civilizations when trying to dominate parts of the world since this
template has been consistently used. The Clash of Civilizations, an essay by Samuel P. Huntington,
argues that, as a result of the Cold War, global politics would be centered around the conflicts
between the world's civilizations. Huntington perceives the conflict between Islam and the West an
extremely impactful conflict. However, The Clash of Ignorance, a literary piece by Edward W. Said,
critiques and disapproves Huntington's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His argument would have been significantly stronger if he showed the darker side of the West as
opposed to making it appear like the West never did anything resulting in a negative impact.
Huntington emphasizes the importance of culture within a civilization by describing it as "a cultural
entity" (Huntington 2). Culture, along with history, language, and religion, is what distinguishes
civilizations from each other (Huntington 2). Similarly, he speaks about the significance of being
aware of one's own civilization and what makes it unique from others. He describes this awareness
using term "civilization–consciousness" and believes that this awareness can sometimes lead to
conflict (Huntington 3). This idea is similar to the idea of nationalism. Nationalism is commonly
used to engender a sense unity within civilizations with the goal of fighting external forces, but
nationalism can be certainly dangerous. For instance, in the film Promises and Betrayals, Arabs and
Jews had an ongoing conflict after the British promised them their independence, which made them
victims of their own sense of nationalism. However, Huntington also mentions actions like
"Asianization" and "re–Islamization" that have the goal of understanding cultural differences
showing the non–violent side of "civilization–consciousness" (Huntington 4). An increase in
tolerance to

Why Are Intra State Conflicts So Difficult? Resolve?
Why are Intra–State Conflicts so difficult to resolve?
This essay analyses the reasoning behind the difficulty of solving intra–state conflicts. First, it
examines the nature of Intra–State Conflicts, defining their origins and clarifying the different types.
The Arab Spring serves as the case in point to elucidate the problem. Furthermore, it is necessary to
describe the role of international actors in preventing as well as solving intra–state conflicts.
Interventionism, as a conflict management tool will be empirically assessed. This essay argues that
there are still imperialist characteristics in the behaviour of Western States, by emphasising upon
NATO foreign policy conducted in response to the Arab Uprising. The biased interventions in intra–
state conflict by international actors are highlighted as to why such conflicts are so difficult to
resolve. Concluding, it is remarked that ethnic, religious and cultural tension within states, as well
the friction between whole civilizations are a significant factor for the complicated nature of intra–
state conflicts.
In the post–cold war era, with the rise of globalisation and the interdependence of markets, one can
observe the moribund decline of traditional inter–state conflicts and the rise of more complex intra–
state conflicts. The reasons behind these conflicts are manifold but at the heart is arguably always a
conflict of interest between two or more groups. The Uppsala Conflict Data Project (2016) defines
armed

Samuel P Huntington The Clash Of Civilizations
There came the competition of global dominance in the modern era, over four hundred years of
Western civilizations interacting, competing, and fighting. The Cold War which lasted over forty
years of the Twentieth Century changed the course of the world and in the end, ushered in a new
world order. In his article "The Clash of Civilizations", Samuel P. Huntington captured what the
world was like at the end of the Cold War. The question during the Cold War was "What side are
you on?" became now "Who are you?" Huntington illustrates that culture and cultural identities are
the primary causes of conflict in the post–Cold war. Nations were attempting to answer the question
they face: Who are we? To do so, they reference things that mean the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2006 led many to believe that it was the start of clash of
civilizations, which Said argued as one not seeing the whole picture. The Egyptian revolution, of
thousands pouring onto Cairo's Tahrir Square demanding the self–determination they were denied,
shows that the clash of civilization was a myth. The world is filled with clashes and significant
conflicts, through the perspective of Huntington's thesis, one will understand the main cause will be
rooted in cultural differences. Through the perspective of Said's thesis, one will understand that any
conflicts in the beginning of the twenty–first century must be thoroughly understood rather than
viewing it through the lenses of an outdated concept. Since the Peace of Westphalia, the balance of
power amongst civilizations is shifting. Although nation states will still be a dominant player in
world politics but the main friction of global conflicts will take place among civilizations. The
international system began with the Treaty of Westphalia and the conflict between monarchies in the
effort to gain more armies, territory and money. Then the system began to shift towards nation states
with the French Revolution. Instead of conflicts between nations, the aftermath of the Russian
revolution led to the conflicts of ideologies, including communism versus fascism versus liberal
democracy. Seen in the Cold War, the battle of communism versus liberal democracy was between
two

The Validity of Samuel P. Huntington’s Thesis in “The...
The aim of Samuel P. Huntington's "The Clash of Civilizations" was to provide an academic
framework to understand almost all of the conflicts that had broken out since the end of the
twentieth century, to include predicting the appearance of future conflicts. According to Huntington,
there will be a clash of civilizations since the world has been in an unreasonable era since the end of
the Cold War and the position of the nation–state has not been of any significance. Far more than the
political objectives of territorial take–overs, it is the religious element of culture that has become the
main cause of conflict. It should be acknowledged that Huntington's "Clash of Civilizations" is a
relatively simple theory which focuses on ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Yet, Huntington states with caution that the differences between his civilizations do not imply the
surfacing of conflicts between them. In contrary, Huntington also develops a completely opposite
argument. Without a doubt, Huntington declares that his civilizations are in conflict because they are
driven by irreconcilable moral and political values, the necessity to survive, and the will to
dominate. The characteristics of the new world order would be that much more disturbing because
the civilizations would act according to the "kin–country syndrome," mainly those civilizations
would partner with the less kin–civilizations. Eventually, a break out in conflict would arise along
the fault lines between civilizations. Huntington's explanation of conflicts all over the world seem to
make sense since a number of conflicts have arisen along his fault lines.
Huntington states that "Islam has bloody borders," hence he describes the appearance of a prominent
Islam threat for the western countries, in addition to the already present threats. His observation of
the borders of his Islam civilizations clearly mirror the practical sources of conflicts on the ground.
Moreover, Huntington argues that the Islamic civilization could use the help of the military,
especially with China and their anti–western reaction, therefore creating a "Confucian–Islamic
connection." Western

The Cold War And The Fall Of The Soviet Union
Following the Cold War and the fall of the Soviet Union, questions regarding what the new world
order would began to arise. In the article published in 1993 "The Clash of Civilizations?", Samuel
Huntington predicts that the conflicts of the new world order would be between civilization and
based in culture, rather than in ideology or economics (22). In his paper, he identifies seven (or
possibly eight) civilizations that will interact with each other, provided six reasons as to why these
civilizations will clash, recognizes the idea that civilizations other than the West are on the rise and
makes suggestions as to how the West should act if his initial is to become true. Since the
publication of his article over 22 years ago, Huntington ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Huntington's argument is essentially that rather than the conflicts in the new world order being
economic or ideological, they will primarily stem from cultural sources and that the next phase in
world conflict will be between civilizations rather than within them (22). He began his article by
defining the nature of civilizations. In doing so, he defines a civilization as "a cultural entity" and
notes that civilizations are "the highest cultural grouping of people and the broadest level of cultural
identity people have short of that which distinguishes humans from other species" (22–23).
According to Huntington, the number of people within a civilization ranges that they are "dynamic;
they rise and fall; they divide and merge" (23). Huntington argues that of Arnold Toynbee's 21 major
civilization in A Study of History only 6 of them still exist in the contemporary world. He identifies
that the world order will be shaped by the way that the following seven, or possibly eight,
civilizations interact: Western, Confucian, Japanese, Islamic, Hindu, Slavic–Orthodox, Latin
American, and possibly African (25). After identifying the major world civilizations, Huntington
presents six major reasons as to why these civilization will clash. For one, the differences that exist
between these entities are real and more importantly basic (25). His second argument is essentially
that the idea that society is becoming more globalized and that interactions

A Theological Perspective of the Clash of Civilizations...
Introduction
On more than one occasion, President George W. Bush has described the terrorist attacks of
September 11, 2001, as fostering "a monumental battle of good versus evil." In this battle, there has
been no doubt in his mind (or in ours) regarding who is on the side of good and who is on the side of
evil. Though some have winced at the President's use of such absolute moral terms to portray the
tragic events of that fateful day, others have applauded his courageous use of such unfashionable
discourse as entirely appropriate, even suggesting that it implies the demise of the cultural scourge
of postmodern moral relativism.
Another important way, not entirely unrelated, of interpreting what transpired on 9/11 is to explain
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to the editors of Foreign Affairs, Huntington's article generated more response over a
three year period than any other article they had published since the 1940s. Given the interest in, as
well as the controversy over and misrepresentation of his article, Huntington decided that the
prudent thing to do would be to expand it into a book–length treatment in which he would explore
more deeply and document more thoroughly the thesis he propounded in his article. So the outcome
was a 1996 book titled The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order.4 In this
work conceived as "an interpretation of the evolution of global politics after the Cold War,"
Huntington aspires, as he says, "to present a framework, a paradigm, for viewing global politics that
will be meaningful to scholars and useful to policymakers."5 Its central theme is virtually identical
to that of his article, namely "that culture and cultural identities, which at Huntington is the Albert J.
Weatherhead III University Professor at Harvard University where he is also the director of the John
M. Olin Institute for Strategic Studies and the chairman of the Harvard Academy for International
and Area Studies. He was the director of security planning for the National Security Council in the
Carter administration, the founder and co–editor of the journal Foreign Policy, and the president of
the American Political Science Association.
3 Samuel

The Clash of Civilizations: a Summary of Samuel...
POLI 100 – F10N01
Gabrielle Bishop
The Clash of Civilizations:
A Summary of Samuel Huntington's controversial Political Analysis and its Critics
"Culture and cultural identities, which at the broadest level are civilizational identities, are shaping
patterns of cohesion, disintegration, and conflict in the post–Cold War World" – Samuel Huntington
POLI 100 – F10N01!
Gabrielle Bishop
In a 1993 article published in Foreign Affairs, Harvard Professor of Government and Political
Scientist Samuel Huntington made a prediction for the 21st century that would go on to be both
disputed and supported by experts around the globe. As the Iron Curtain of ideology of the Cold War
had fallen, Huntington theorized that a new "Velvet ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Feles instead proposes that he "[pay] more attention to detail, of the sort provided by anthropology"
12. Only then, she states, will his predictions improve from a "constantly risk–running sort to a
relatively risk–averse one"13.
Huntington begins the next section, "Part 2: The Shifting Balance of Civilizations", by stating that
the power and influence the West once held is now dying14. Although the civilization did
experience success with the collapse of the Soviet Union, Huntington argues that the West has
become "exhausted"15. He brings to light two opposing arguments:
(A): That the West still holds a monopoly over economic consumption, military strength, and
technology;16 and,
(B): That the West is losing its influence and power.17
Huntington takes the side of Argument B, and expands on it further. He notes that while the West's
power and influence may indeed be declining, it will be a very slow process and is therefore not an
immediate threat presently to global forces 18. Huntington stresses the growing role religion is now

playing in global politics. He notes that religion often gains popularity in response to a society's
changing needs. He mentions, for example, how many South Koreans have abandoned their
traditional Buddhist beliefs in exchange for Christianity as their nation has become increasingly
urban and

Compare and Contrast of the Arguments in Huntington's "The...
Samuel Huntington has made famous his thesis "the clash of civilizations", which was developed in
his article in Foreign Affairs in 1993 and in the book that followed, in which the author expanded
his thesis and reaffirmed the validity of his theory after the success and controversy that followed
the publication of his article. In fact, the "civilizational" approach of conflicts today is now
intrinsically linked to a comprehensive theory of international relations, which Samuel Huntington
has developed by giving it an important value and a dominant paradigm
Reacting to the theory of Fukuyama, Samuel P. Huntington resumed the expression "Clash of
civilizations" in 1993 and speculates that it is mainly cultural and religious identities ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The current evolution of the world after the Cold War led to the assertion of multiple civilizations;
The balance of power among civilizations changes and the relative influence of the Midwest
declines, while the non–Western civilizations reaffirm the value of their own culture.
Samuel Huntington sees an emerging world organized on the basis of "civilizations". Societies that
share cultural affinities cooperate with each other and the efforts to force a society into another
civilization will fail; countries gather around the leading States of their civilization. This description
of the process of new structures of international relations that Huntington sees developing, leads him
to consider that the greatest risks of violence and confrontation lie in the Westerns' claims to
universality, which are leading them to increasingly get into conflict with other civilizations,
particularly Islam and China; local conflicts, especially between Muslims and non–Muslims,
generate new alliances and lead to an escalation of violence, which will usually lead the dominant
states to make an attempt to stop them.
On the other hand, Edward Said argues that the concept of clash of civilizations is a myth whose
purpose is to justify an aggressive attitude in the minds of American and form a base for American
and Western aggression against China and the Islamic world and culture.
Beyond the paradigmatic character of his

Evaluation Of Huntington 's Thesis
Evaluation of Huntington's Thesis: A Reference to Muslim and U.S. Relations
Krystal Johnson
Savannah State University Evaluation Huntington's Thesis:
A Reference to Muslim and U.S. Relations
In 1992, Samuel Huntington had suggested his idea on the Clash of Civilizations (COC) which he
later, in 1996, discussed in more detail in his book The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of
World Order (Huntington 1996). The most popular inference made from his thesis is the idea that
post–Cold War conflicts will be due to cultural difference and religion rather than cooperation.
Huntington surrounds this idea around eight major civilizations which are: Western, Confucian,
Japanese, Hindu, Latin American, Islamic, Salvic–Orthodox, and African (Payne 2013). However,
although there are individuals that support this idea, there have been many criticisms to Huntington's
thesis. This paper will critically evaluate Huntington's thesis in relations to the Muslim–U.S.
relations. Huntington refers to certain cultures being totally different whereas the culture of the
United States is not that much different to that of the Muslim. Also, paper will address a study that
provides qualitative data that proves that Muslim–U.S. cultural differences are unlikely to be the
cause of conflict and other studies show that it more likely to be caused by other situations.
Huntington also fails to provide a link between cultural characteristics and behavior as well as
civilization and foreign policies.

The Clash Of Civilizations By Samuel Huntington Essay
Samuel Huntington's controversial article "The Clash of Civilizations?" was first published in
Foreign Affairs in 1993 and was subsequently turned into a book in 1996 titled The Clash of
Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. As this paper will show Huntington's work can be
seen as a product of the post–Cold War context it was written in. Huntington's article takes a new
perspective on the new world order and outlines a different way a thinking about how future world
conflicts will unfold. Since the initial journal article was published in 1993 there has been a great
deal of response from academics and also from Huntington himself. A majority of the responses
come in the form of critiques, with the authors offering their own insight into how the post–Cold
War World will operate. Although the validity of Huntington's arguments have been questioned, it
did create a great deal of controversy in the academic world. As Huntington explained in the preface
of his 1996 book, the original article published in Foreign Affairs created more discussion in three
years than any other article published in the journal since the 1940s.
Huntington's initial article argued that in the post–Cold War era the fundamental source of conflict
would not be ideological or economic, but cultural. He continues by arguing that nation states will
continue to be the most powerful actors in global affairs, but the conflicts of global politics that are
to occur in the future will happen between

Commentary and Analysis of Samuel Huntington’s paper “The...
Lately there has been a thought that the difference in Civilizations is another issue that may cause a
conflict. Starting from World War I the arguments raised by nations were over an ideology: fascism
vs. communism, communism vs. democracy. Some people believe that the next step would be a war
based on a cultural sense and religion. Such war would unite people with similar beliefs, views on
the world, language, tradition and history. They believe the conflict of the future will occur along the
cultural fault lines separating civilizations [1]. So what exactly is the clash of civilizations? This was
briefly addressed in Samuel Huntington's paper "The clash of civilizations?". In order to explain the
term, let's first look into what civilization is. Person does not simply get to choose the civilization
he/she simply belongs to. Communists can become democrats and vice versa, but Russians can
never become Americans or Arabs cannot become European. In the conflict between civilizations
the question is "What are you?", it is something given and cannot be changed. Conflicts between
countries are inevitable and with the way things work it is just a matter of time, before one country
would not be comfortable with what other country is doing. In that case, cultural characteristics and
differences are less mutable and hence less easily compromised and resolved than political and
economic ones [1]. The clash of civilizations often occurs on two levels. Micro–level is when small

The Butterfly Mosque By Samuel Huntington
The idea of a clash of civilizations can be originated largely to Samuel Huntington. He describes a
future where the majority of human conflicts will be due to "cultural differences". (Huntington). In
The Butterfly Mosque, Willow Wilson, an American, travels to Egypt, converts to Islam, and
marries an Egyptian man. This places her at the fault lines of two cultures. Through her experiences,
she sees the frontlines of this clash of civilizations that Huntington predicted, and tries to uncover if
she can thread the needle between her two cultures. In this paper, I will argue that through her
experiences with Muslims in Tura, other Westerners in Egypt, and in reactions to her writings, she
discovers that the clash of civilizations is real. This clash results in cruelty, fear, self–hatred, and an
internal existential crisis in Willow that leaves her uncertain about whether or not she can navigate
her internal clash of cultures.
Willow's experiences in Tura with Muslims demonstrated the Muslim response to Western culture.
In Tura, she is surrounded by a much more conservative group of people than were in Cairo. She felt
the "anger" that people had towards the West (120). Between the West and Arabic cultures, there
was "a pit full of dangers: poverty, terrorism, wars of attrition, racism, colonialism, and malice"
(119). This bred distrust, and it was palpable to Willow. Between many of the inhabitants of Tura to
Willow, there was a lack of compassion or care given to her. One

A Summary Of The Clash Of Civilizations
Cultural differences among humankind have long existed and can be traced down to the early
beginnings of human race. Even nowadays conflicts between civilization exist without the necessity
of there being confrontation between each other. In "The Clash of Civilizations?", Samuel P.
Huntington hypothesizes that the great differences between humankind will not arise from
differences in ideology or economy but from differences between cultures; hence, the battle lines of
the future will be those that separate civilizations and no longer first, second or third world
countries. Huntington describes a civilization as one that is "the highest cultural grouping of people
and the broadest level of cultural identity people have" (Huntington). In his perspective, a
civilization goes way beyond an ethnic group, a nationality or a religion; instead, it comprises all of
this. Among the eight major civilizations Huntington classifies are: Western, Confucian, Japanese,
Islamic, Hindu, Slavic–Orthodox, Latin American and African. The Clash of Civilizations arises
from the idea that culture is paramount; thus, if conflicted it cannot be as easily resolved as conflicts
within terms of ideology or economy. The main differences between civilizations are portrayed
through history, language, culture, tradition and religion; all which have formed over thousands of
years and represent each civilization uniquely. As the world continuously evolves, it becomes easier
for civilizations to interact

When The Worlds Collide
"All ancient civilisations have contributed in some way to the development of modern society." –
with these words of Dr Joyce Tyldesley I believe the main thought of documentary "When the
Worlds Collide" written by Carl Byker and Ruben Martinez can be worded.
The film presents the moment of the discovery of America by Spaniards and the following years,
focusing mainly on the cultural aspects that underwent changes in that time. It shows the way
various elements from both civilizations merged and intertwined to work as one new entity. The
documentary also illustrates the clash of the New World and the Old World with the effects on both
sides, the most prominent one being the creation of a new culture – the Mestizo culture, which is the
mix ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When the Romans took over Greece, they also took over the Greek culture and, to a small degree,
language in the process of Hellenisation . The Roman religion was created by copying the religion
of the Greeks, with the exception of the names of the gods and goddesses and some other details.
Other than that, the Romans also adopted the Greek architectural and literary style. As of other
countries that were conquered by Rome, the Romans also took the way of building ships and the
alphabet in an altered form from Phoenicia. In all of the countries that the Romans conquered they
would build roads for their armies to move quickly. Roman roads were so tough and well–built that
many of them have lasted in good condition even until now; the famous oldest road Via Appia that
leads from Rome to Naples is still in use . Moreover, the Romans built numerous cities, among
which are Vienna , London and Paris . Had Rome not conquered so many countries, the modern
world would have looked entirely different. Rome had an enormous input in shaping of the
European culture. Because Rome invaded other lands and created an enormous empire, it was able
to spread the knowledge and new inventions on an extensive

Critical Analysis Of The Clash Of Civilizations By Samuel...
More than two decades have passed since Samuel Huntington published his influential article, "the
Clash of Civilizations?" (1993). The article presented a new paradigm for describing global politics
in the post–Cold War world. Huntington's framework divided the world into several major
civilizations, and argued that civilization's cultural identity and religions will become the most
important driving forces. Civilizations and states' behaviors, and mostly participation in conflicts,
will no longer be driven from ideological or economic forces as they were during in the time of the
cold war era. Moreover, he argued that for the first time the world has become multipolar and multi–
civilizational. This (the argument?) shapes geopolitics at the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Initially Rrevolutions were initially seen as a "new version" of the nineteenth century Europe's
Spring of Nations or the more contemporary anti–communist revolutions of 1989 in Eastern Europe
. After years of conflict between values of the Western and Islamic civilizations, the same conflict
that Huntington and his critics discuss, some argued, the Muslim Arab world ultimately chose to
adopt Western values: human rights, freedom, and democracy. Thus, they experts who believed that
the Arab spring symbolized a chance for democracy and change in the Arab world argued, that Islam
is not in a clash with the West and its values, but rather exists in many clashes within (within what?
Within Islam?). the Arab worlditself. Islam has no role in mobilizing the protestors. Muslim Arab
people's will no longer accept their suppressing corrupted illiberal regimes. They Instead, they chose
instead in Western democracy, and so the Muslim–Western dispute is bound to come to an end.
Therefore, Huntington's clash of civilizations is refuted, and it appears that there is no such a clash.
(Gropp, 2013; Keck, 2013; Kamali,

The Operant Manifesto By Samuel P. Huntington
The Operant Manifesto
Crucify the last two letters from my last name and change my first. Call me Emmanuel.
For all one knows, Samuel P. Huntington could be right about the reasons for this "clash" he
describes as being "global", a clash which occurs in the near future. Let that future hold its destiny
in its hands for now. You may remember his argument, about the source of our "great division"
being cultural and "not primarily ideological." It is this that I plan to expand on but not at the
expense of explaining it in totally non–characteristic manner. To further augment how culture will
cause this apparent "clash of civilizations," I have attempted to map–out what I consider outstanding
focuses in the process of this "clash." The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
History itself is a diachronic science and constructing a true historical record coincidentally begins
its origins in the West. History starts in Mesopotamia and Egypt then somehow works its way into
Rome, then the text books, then the American psyche. It is this pattern, as opposed to the historical
record other countries keep, which Americans rely on. This goes side–by–side with the repetitive
role Euro–centrism plays in defining our origins and identity in society. Can an aggregation of
narratives that help bridge the gap between empirical evidence that supports our origin as a species
honestly rule over this post–World War Two triumphant state we live in? Can the world converge, or
are the shifting patterns of philosophy out ruling this possibility? Our environment and technology
serves as a back–drop to this triumphant society we familiarize with and here it is that one of my
"branches" from the political/social tree emerges: There is no diversity in our culture, only
dominance – of all societies; this is how we are "conditioned" to believe our origins are of the
"Western" hemisphere. Can Carbon 14 accurately yield ideas as to when Megalithic structures were
erected? Is our ego–centrism a reaction to the condescending belief that we Americans have created
an accurate enough history of the world, and have tapped into the truth of our saga not in favor of
ourselves?

The Clash Of Civilizations: The Clash Of Civilization
I. Introduction
As being stated by Samuel P. Huntington, the Clash of Civilization is a hypothesis in which the
primary sources of conflicts in the post–cold war era are more dominant to the people's cultural and
religious identities. Civilization has three attributes which are the objective elements – language,
history religion, customs, and institution; the subjective elements – variable levels of self–
identification; and civilization itself is dynamic – they rise and fall, divide and merge. Dialogue
between civilizations are also needed and will give significant impacts for not only both civilizations
but also for the world. This paper would like to discuss and analyze two cases about the possibility
of Post–American World Order towards ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Bibliography
Alverdian, Indra. "Lesson 3 – Globalization and The Clash of Civilizations." Lecture, The Clash of
Civilizations and Its International Implications, President University, Cikarang, Bekasi, Indonesia,
2016.
Huntington, Samuel P. "The Clash of Civilizations?" Foreign Affairs, 2004, 22–49. Accessed
December 11, 2016. http://users.metu.edu.tr/utuba/Huntington.pdf.
Longworth, Richard C. "Can China Rise Peacefully?" Chicago Council on Global Affairs. Last
modified April 8, 2014. https://www.thechicagocouncil.org/event/can–china–rise–peacefully.
Sultanbayeva, Gulmyra S. "Civilization Dialogues: Concord Dialectics Between West and East."
Polish Political Science Yearbook 43 (2014), 7–12. Accessed December 12, 2016.
http://www.marszalek.com.pl/yearbook/docs/43/ppsy2014001.pdf.
Zakaria, Fareed. "Chapter 4: The Challenger." In The Post–American World, 87–128. New York:
W.W. Norton, 2008.

Nancy Pearcey Worldview In Conflict
In "Worldview In Conflict", the authors, Charles Colson and Nancy Pearcey, wrote this essay with
the viewpoint that the clash of worldviews is between Christian beliefs and naturalism, and not
between traditional religions or cultures which is what most people perceive the biggest conflict to
be. Charles Colson, according to the short bio at the beginning of this essay and his online bio at
CNSnews, is a bestselling author, commentator, international speaker, and syndicated columnist
who writes books and articles encouraging Christians to understand their faith in an international
worldview. Before becoming a born again evangelical Christian, he was President Richard Nixon's
"hatchet man", moreover he served seven months in prison when he pled guilty to obstruction of
justice for his part in the Watergate cover–up. He became a born–again Christian in prison and once
out he founded Prison Fellowship Ministries and spent much of his life writing and speaking about
his Christian belief and views. Nancy Pearcey, per her bio on her website and the website for
Houston Baptist University (HBU) is an author, commentator, speaker, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This book was assigned as a requirement of my English Writing I class at Bryan College. This
prompted me to believe that this book has been vetted by the university and is a credible source.
This book is a collection of writings written with a Christian point of view, published by Baker
Academic, a publisher who publishes primary and secondary textbook geared towards Christian
learning. This essay is excerpted from Colson's and Pearcy's book How Now Shall We Live?
published by Tyndale House Publishing, a publisher of all forms of Christian literature. This book
was written from Colson and Pearcey's worldview in answer to basic life questions and how we
should live because of those answers per the blurb on the back of the

Potential Dialogue Between Civilizations And The Clash Of...
I. Introduction
As being stated by Samuel P. Huntington, the Clash of Civilization is a hypothesis in which the
primary sources of conflicts in the post–cold war era are more dominant to the people's cultural and
religious identities. Civilization has three attributes which are the objective elements – language,
history religion, customs, and institution; the subjective elements – variable levels of self–
identification; and civilization itself is dynamic – they rise and fall, divide and merge. Dialogue
between civilizations are also needed and will give significant impacts for not only both civilizations
but also for the world. This paper would like to discuss and analyze two cases about the possibility
of Post–American World Order towards the potential Dialogue between Civilizations or the Clash of
Civilizations theory; and the contribution of Dialogue between Civilizations towards the
management of negative impact in this globalization era.
II. The Possibility of a Post–American World Order Will Strengthen the Potential for Dialogue
Between Civilizations or Increase the Relevancy with The Clash of Civilizations Hypothesis
The Post–American World Order, a term ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Huntington instead of strengthen the potential Dialogue between Civilizations. This can be seen by
the case above that the U.S. – or mostly known as the Western Civilizations – is frightened and
worried about the rise of China – or known as the Chinese Civilizations. This case will create the
clash between the West and Chinese Civilizations. The clash of civilizations that will be occurred by
both the West and Chinese civilizations will be in a form of the macro–level clash of civilizations
where the states from different civilizations compete for economic power, struggle over the control,
and competitively promote their particular political and religious

The Conflict Between China And The United States
This foreign policy study will argue in favor of Samuel Huntington's theory of the "clash of
civilizations" through cultural divisions in the context of the increasing global conflict between
China and The United States. In essence, the "clash of civilizations" between China and the United
States will be primarily based on the problem of cultural hegemony in the 21st century struggle for
global dominance between these two modern nation states. Huntington's theory provides ample
evidence of the growing clash of religious cultural values, which are often based on the atheistic
principles of Chinese governing policies and the moral and ethical issues of pro–religious Christian
values of western nations. The perception of China as a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The importance of cultural factors in Huntington's theory of the "clash of civilizations" beholds a far
more powerful influence than is typically assumed in the neoliberal materialism of the 21st century.
China's rise as a superpower has typically been defined through the context of economic, financial,
and ideological forces that have historically been a threat to the United States. However,
Huntington's (1996) cultural theory of the "clash of civilizations" does represent the underlying
presence of conflicts through the old nation–state system as a cultural barrier, yet he defines the
cultural values of a "civilization" as a much older source of conflict: "Westerners tend to think of
nation states as the principle actors in global affairs. They have been that, however, for only a few
centuries. The broader reaches of human history have been the history of civilizations" (p.24). This
aspect of culture is defined through the differing regions and cultural values of a "civilization",
which define a much broader source of conflict in the beliefs and values that create conflict. In this
manner, Huntington (1996) provides important insight into the cultural values that are currently
involved in the clash of civilizations between the U.S. and China in global affairs. This will be an
important part of the underlying process of the war–like cultural differences between China and the
U.S. that are a major part of global conflict in the 21st century. For

Lash Of Clization Analysis
THEORIES ON "CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS" The end of the Cold War was not just a political
landmark: It also triggered an extraordinary intellectual event, inviting the construction of a number
of ambitious paradigms that attempt to account for its meta–historical implications. The main stream
theories of Francis Fukuyama and Samuel Huntington, although they are not the only one existing,
have been the two predominant approaches to the new world structure and the possible fronts that
humanity will have to face as a result of the new divisions among different cultures and/or
civilizations and the different ideologies prevailing. However both have been strongly criticized and
argued from the scientific community. They remain though the most contemporary

The West : Unique, Not Universal, By Samuel P. Huntington
In Samuel P. Huntington's article "The West: Unique, Not Universal," he addresses his audience
with a very controversial question: Is Western Culture universal or unique? Huntington elaborately
opens up this question with research and examples to explain and persuade readers that the West will
never be a universal culture for all, but rather a unique culture that will be accepted by those who
appreciate it. For decades now, historians and scholars have debated with one another to determine
who is right and wrong. However, from a handful of articles from different scholars, Samuel
Huntington's statement that the West is unique rather than universal is supported and even further
elaborated on by these particular sources. A common understanding between all the sources, that
must be noted, is that a civilization's culture is not comprised of material goods but rather their
culmination of their religion(s), values, language(s) and traditions. While although there are scholars
out their that negate the West is unique, a large amount of scholars still argue and strengthen
Huntington's argument that the West has unique and exclusive characteristics that make them
distinctive and rare.
Samuel P. Huntington was a brilliant student and political scientist who wrote numerous articles and
is most notably recognized for his novel "The Clash of Civilizations." He attended college at Yale
University and went on to get his PhD in political science. Moreover he was a Harvard professor

The Clash of Civilization (Samuel Huntington Article...
The article titled the Clash of Civilization written by Samuel Huntington tries to analyze the world
after the cold war.
Huntington in his thesis clearly states that the new era of world politics will not be based on
conflicts occurring due to ideological or economic clashes amongst states, but rather the dominating
source of conflict will be cultural.
Huntington proposes that instead of classifying countries into first, second or third worlds, one
should classify countries in terms of their civilization. He defines one as the highest cultural
grouping of people and the broadest level of cultural identity people have. Characterization of
civilization can be seen through language and religion, but the issue arises that people ultimately ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
4. Even though the west have never been more powerful in both cultural and economic influence,
non–western civilizations have been promoting indigenization.
5. It is easier to change economic and political differences then to change cultural ones, because
religion makes a sharp distinction between who you are?
6. regional trade has increased among similar cultures and floundered among dissimilar ones. A
classic example of this notion is how Japan has not been able to be very successful in bringing
together other east Asian countries due to its different culture, while the common culture between
China and other East Asian countries has managed to expand regional trade amongst them.
Hence, Huntington proclaims that the clash of civilization will occur at two levels, at the micro level
conflicts will occur along civilizational borders, while at the macro level conflicts will happen
where power and ideology will be in question.
Huntington notes that the dominance of the west through its power and influence will be
predominantly to preserve their status and to be able to confront non–western civilizations when
their position is threatened. He then predicts that conflicts between the west and the rest is primarily
going to be on the cultural or power differences. He believes that non–western civilizations have
three choices, either to isolate and

Kin Country Syndrome

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Ashley Fisher

More from Ashley Fisher (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Kin Country Syndrome