Airbus vs Boeing: Commercial Jet Rivalry

Airbus vs Boeing
Executive Summary
Activities in the commercial aeroplane manufacturing industry have been outshined by the competition involving the European owned Airbus and the
USA owned Boeing. These two companies exist as a duopoly at the top end of the commercial aeroplane manufacturing industry that covers the
development of airplanes with a capability of more than 200 persons. Other aeroplane manufacturers also exist but at the lower end of the industry,
these smaller firms mainly develop low capacity airplanes that basically convey less than 150 persons.
Boeing is a United States of America based company which was founded by William Edward in 1916, the firm has been dominating the industry since
its inception while on the other hand Airbus was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As according to the company, this aircraft would help airliners save fuel costs. The aircraft is also intended to be tons lighter than other models.
Airbus, on the other hand, with its A350 XWB intends to offer the airline market with the largest aircraft it has produced till date. Post, Paris Air
Show and the Dubai Air Show held in 2007, A350 claims to give a stiff competition to 787. Boeing plans to deliver its Dreamliner by 2008, and
Airbus by 2013. Boeing with 5 years of advantage, and confirmed orders, industry observers inquire, if Airbus would beat the time advantage or bank
on the strength of the A350, or better still use the time to their advantage and modify the aircraft to being user friendly
QUESTION 1: What is a duopoly market? How is competition dynamics structured in a duopoly market? What are the pitfalls of a duopoly market?
A duopoly market can simply be referred to as one in which two firms own all or nearly all of the market for a given product or service or it is a
term which is basically used to describe an industry where market share is dominated by only two firms. This market structure which is a form of an
oligopoly applies where few competing companies with many buyers strategically interact with its rivals by reacting to key business decisions. This has
been the case for market segments for the manufacturing of commercial airplanes. Over the years this market has been dominated mainly
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Changeable Nature of the Air Transport Markets
The Changeable Nature of the Air Transport Markets Over the last five years the air transport markets were marked by three main crucial events; the
economic recession, the rise in fuel prices and terrorism. All these factors had an enormous effect on the passenger market, which included business
(network carriers, business focused carriers, fractional ownership and private charters), the leisure industry (network carriers, scheduled carriers and
charter carriers) and the cargo market, which is divided in scheduled combination carriers (passenger & cargo and all cargo carrying aircraft) and
all–cargo (integrators, airport to airport and charter). Recessions tended to hit the industry every 6–9 years and last for 2–3 years at a time.... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the business market it is clear to see that this market aims at providing a premium service which include luxuries, for example the use of airport
lounges and bigger seats on the aircraft and people are willing to pay extra money for these luxuries. It is possible to assume that in times of
recession and rising fuel costs that pricier seats, such as the seats in business and first class, would be less popular and harder to sell but that does
not seem to be the case. IATA estimated that average ticket costs for business class flights have risen 8 percent in the first half of 2010. Business
travellers make up 8 percent of overall passenger numbers but contribute 27 percent of ticket revenue, IATA said in its latest snapshot of the airline
business. Premium travel has risen almost twice as far in percentage terms from its 2009 low as economy travel, but, such was the depth of the fall of
the premium segment, current levels are still 10% below pre–recession peaks, whereas economy travel is now 5% above its pre–recession peak. The
cargo market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 8.2% over the forecast period. Excluding the impact of the rapid post recession rebound in 2010, for the
2011–2014 period, the consensus view for air freight is that it will stabilize at 5% CAGR. This is slightly below the forecast growth in world trade
(6%) suggesting a still conservative

Boeing's Supply Chain System
Introduction
Boeing follows the goal of "to find and apply the best, most innovative technologies and processes in the world to improve our products and services"
(Boeing Frontiers, 2005). By utilizing the contents of this quote it is apparent at what Boeing is best at accomplishing internally which is their
innovations through R&D and their supply chain management system. These assets improve their products and services enabling Boeing to become the
aerospace conglomerate of today. By analyzing these processes and the products they create will give a better look into the value, rarity, imitability, and
organization that each holds along with demonstrating their strengths, weaknesses, and other organizational situations.
Value
Boeing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In turn, this has lead Boeing to not be shy about publically saying that they gain value from being a lean company and they mean it. Throughout the
years Boeing has developed a lasting relationship with a massive amount of parts suppliers, but they are not afraid to cut ties with the current supplier
for one that has a more cost effective goal in mind. On the 777X the company discontinued service with long time partner Messier–Dowty which
manufactured all of the previous landing gear assemblies for the 777 and gave the contract to Heroux–Devtek (HDI) for a serious trimming cost of
roughly $30 million per year (Supply Chain Push, 2012).
The airline manufacturer has also generated profit gaining value from being an industry leader in innovation. As depicted in the rarity section Boeing
has upcoming projects that prove fruitful in peaking customer interest. Currently the main focus of Boeings innovations have been to improve
reliability, faster flying jetliners, and farther flying jets. They have been able to combine all of these ideas in the 787 Dreamliner which is has
increased seat capacity from 125 to over 400, and decreased fuel cost of $11.53 per nautical mile when compared with the 777–300ER depicted in
Figure 3. With future orders in place of over $440 billion with the majority of major airlines this new model is sure to set the industry bar

Boeing Company's Goals and Actions
Abstract This paper analyzes the goals and actions of Boeing by analyzing its critical success factors as well as its strategic roadmap.
Introduction The Boeing Corporation is one of the largest manufacturers in the world. Rivaled only by European giant Airbus in the aerospace industry,
Boeing is a leader in research, design and manufacture of commercial jet airliners, for commercial, industrial and military customers. Despite enjoying
immense success in its market and dominating an industry that solely recognizes engineering excellence, it is crucial for Boeing to ensure continued
growth through consistent strategy formulation and execution to avoid falling behind in market share to close and coming rivals. Boeing's goals are ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Steady Defense Business Growth The Boeing Company's defense business has been growing steadily over the past few years. Revenues from the
integrated defense system grew from $27,361 million in 2003 to $30,791 million in 2005. The defense business accounts for over 55% of the
company's revenues. Continued strong performance of this division of the Boeing Company would counter any downturn in the commercial aircraft
industry (DATAMONITOR).
Strong Growth from Developing Geographic Markets The Boeing Company has registered strong growth in the developing markets in China,
Oceania and Africa (Boeing Frontiers, Nov. 2005). For the fiscal year 2005, revenues from China grew by 87.9%; revenues from Oceania grew by
$32; and revenues from Africa grew 61.8% over the 2004 fiscal year. These regions represent some of the fastest growing economies of the world. The
Boeing Company's growing market share in these regions would boost the company revenues of the future (DATAMONITOR).
Strategic Analysis and Choice
The main objective of Boeing's strategy is to analyze the commercial aircraft industry, to understand the demand that is present, and to formulate a
solution that will fulfill that segment. Currently, there are only two major players in the global market: Boeing and Airbus. Boeing is widely known as
the "free market" champion, while Airbus represents the "not–so–free" approach of the European Union's organized and government subsidized

Boeing 787
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering IE466: Concurrent Engineering
Individual Homework #1 – Boeing 787: The Dreamliner
Boeing 787: The Dreamliner Case Study (download from Angel) During the past decade, Boeing watched as their competitor, Airbus, launched
several new and very successful aircraft. In 2004, Airbus surpassed Boeing in commercial airplanes delivered and future orders placed. This is the
first time that Boeing has ever lost its leading market share. The 787 is the first new airplane that Boeing has introduced to the market in a decade.
This case study examines how the 787 is strategically transforming Boeing's approach to aircraft ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With all the steps that Boeing took, it was guaranteed that Boeing would be successful in the market.
2. How does the approach used for the 787's development differ fundamentally from other airplane projects undertaken by Boeing?
The approach that Boeing 787 took was fundamentally different than other airplane projects undertaken by Boeing. Boeing built 70% of the products
of Boeing 787 from different countries of the world. Boeing has a long–standing reputation to be secretive with their projects, so it was a big step for
Boeing to break their privacy and work with a group of people across geographical boundaries. 35% of the plane's structure was supplied from
Japan. Approximately, 26% of the products were supplied from Italy. There were teams of 15 companies responsible for the structure of the plane,
10 teams from USA and the rest from seven other countries. A lot of the other products were also ordered from different parts of the world,
including the vertical fin from Frederickson as well as the fixed and movable leading edges of the wing from Tulsa. Once all the parts were built, they
were sent back to USA for the assembly. Also, 787 would be the first aircraft of its kind to bring long–range capabilities to a midsized airplane. It was
also the first time Boeing had its structural suppliers fund their own research and development so that suppliers had a greater

The Business Level Strategy Of Boeing
Business level strategies of Boeing commercial:
The business level strategies for Boeing commercial are deliver customer value, lead with innovation and fuel growth through productivity. Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, a business unit of The Boeing Company, is committed to being the leader in commercial aviation by offering airplanes and
services that deliver superior design, efficiency and value to customers around the world (Boeing.com, n.d).
Customer Needs and Product Differentiation: Boeing makes an effort to be well aware about the needs of their customers which is why they conduct
customer surveys. After the 2007 customer survey Boeing knew where they were progressing and where they lacked.
Boeing pursues Product Differentiation strategy in order to create competitive advantage over Airbus. Boeing differentiates its products by increasing
number of seating capacity, engine capacity, innovating new winglet designs and by manufacturing wide range of products in respect to the change in
market ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This business level strategy allows Boeing to create distinctive competencies from its rival, Airbus and gain an edge over them. Boeing has been
successful in maintaining this business model due to its high R&D which has led to some great innovations in aircraft manufacturing such as the
production of Advanced Winglet, DigitalAirline, Performance Based Navigation System to name a few. Boeing has also prioritized customer service
in their corporate strategies and have implemented GoldCare IT Enterprise Suite as means of 24/7 customer service regarding operations along with
AOG solutions as means of after sales service to the customers. As mentioned Boeing Dreamliner 787 has been created keeping in mind the customers'
psychological desires in mind which sets Boeing apart. Boeing has been very successful over the years to create their competitive advantage and
maintain its superior performance and they continue to do

The Boeing Company Financial Health
Introduction
The goal of the study is to provide overall financial statement overview of The Boeing Company using the knowledge obtained during the Financial
Management course.
The main question of the study is how financially well the company is at the moment and what investment expectation it generates on the market
nowdays.
The Boeing Company background
The company was originally founded by William Boeing on July 15, 1916, as "The Pacific Aero Products Company". Two years later it was renamed
into "The Boeing Company", on May 9, 1917. Since that date the company grew and acquired a lot of its competitors, including the McDonnell
Douglas in 1997.
[pic]
The Boeing's structure consists of two main divisions and two ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Reasons:
– In comparison to 2008, sales in 2010 increased by $3381 million.
– In comparison to 2008, CGS in 2010 increased only by $1513 million.
Boeing's 2010 Gross Profit Margin ratio is comparable with the industry norm of 19,7%.
ROA ratio indicates the efficiency with which management has used its available resources to generate income. In 2009 there was a decrease in ROA
value, but ROA in 2010 matches the industry average. That means that assets in 2010 were used efficiently.

ROS ratio indicates the profitability generated from revenue and hence is an important measure of operating performance. In 2010 return on sales
reached the highest value of 5,14%. This indicates that the earning power of the business improved in 2010, but it's still below the earning capacity of
an average firm in the industry. Reasons for increase:
– In comparison to 2008, operational income in 2010 increased by $983 million. – In comparison to 2008, sales in 2010 increased by $3381 million.
The decline in ROA, ROS, Gross Profit Margin and OIRI in 2009 was caused by the decline in Net Income from $2676 to $1312. In 2009 the
company to write off $2.7 billion because it considers the first three Dreamliners built unsellable and suitable only for flight tests. These expenses
could be found in income Statement as R&D expenses. R&D increased in 2009 by $2738 million in comparison to 2008 and resulted in significant

Boeing Case Summary
In assessing the current situation for the Boeing 747–8, there are many things that we need to look at. There is a passenger version and a freight
version of the aircraft and this analysis will mainly focus on the passenger plane. We will first look at the current performance, which is going to
show us some concerns we can address at a later time. Next we will look at the overall market demand and the specific decreased demand for this
product. No analysis would be complete without looking at the competition and the planes that are more likely to be direct competition for the 747–8.
Lastly, we will look at the customer needs, and how Boeing may create a competitive position and increase value for their customers and themselves in
the future. Boeing is the world cargo market leader but prospects for this cargo market segment are slowing. However, the freight aircraft is still
producing better results than the passenger aircraft. The first thing we notice when looking at the current performance of the 747–8 is that the orders
for this plane are not as expected. Boeing would need to sell nearly 40 more of these planes over the backlog of orders to remotely get near profits
given the heavy costs. Production has even decreased due to this and without more orders, there is less than three years of production left on this
plane. Boeing is currently producing at a rate of 16 planes per year. As of the middle of December, there were no new orders for 2014 as 2 orders
previously

Boeing And Airbus Approach The Aircraft Marketplace
Dominating the commercial aircraft market for decades, Boeing is considered to be the most highly competitive U.S aerospace industry. "U.S.
firms manufacture a wide variety of products for civil and defense purposes and, in 2010, the value of aerospace industry shipments was estimated
at $171 billion, of which civil aircraft and aircraft parts accounted for over half of all U.S. aerospace shipments. The U.S. aerospace industry
exported nearly $78 billion in products in 2010, of which $67 billion (or 86% of total exports) were civil aircraft, engines, equipment, and parts"
(Harrison, 2011). However, its position of influence has lessened in recent years. This is due to its main competitor,Airbus, who in recent years has
made significant ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Second, Airbus, McDonnell Douglas, and Boeing are multi–product firms that are selling several products during most time periods. When Boeing
considers lowering a price of one of its products, this will not only reduce the market share of Airbus's products, but it might also undercut the sales of
Boeing's other products. Boeing may then lower its prices by less than in a situation when it only sells one product.
In a strategy similar to that of Airbus, Boeing absorbed its largest rival, McDonnell Douglas, in 1977. Boeing's newest entry into the market is the 787
Dreamliner, a revolutionary jetliner manufactured with up to 50 percent composition materials and designed to increase fuel efficiency and reduce
environmental impact. The aircraft has suffered several problems since the first model rolled off the line in 2007, most notably with the lithium–ion
battery pack. These issues were resolved in 2013 and Boeing expects the 787 to be incredibly successful due to new demand for super–efficient
airliners, a result of rising global fuel prices. Boeing is the wworld's largest aerospace company, and the leading manufacturer of commercial jetliners
and military aircraft combined. The company designs and manufactures rotorcraft, electronic and defense systems, missiles, satellites, launch vehicles
and advanced information and communication systems. They are a major

Boeing 787 Dreamliner: Time, Budget and Project...
Contents
Boeing 787 Dreamliner:
Time, Budget and Project Performance Analysis
1 Introduction.
1.1 In developing the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, Boeing executive management's initial decisions and project management strategies did not control the
four major measurements of project success: time, budget, performance and client acceptance (Pinto, 2013, pp. 35,36). This report analyses the
methodology and project management decisions that led to a project crisis and risk to Boeing's reputation.
2 Boeing history.
2.1 Boeing Aircraft Corporation, with a heritage of aircraft design, manufacture and assembly, dates back to July 1916 (Boeing, 2004). Recent aircraft
including 737, 747, 767, and 777 are all designed, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Other companies, for example the Toyota Motor Company, use out–sourcing successfully to trusted companies with a high degree of product design
control as a method to reduce costs in production (Denning, 2013).
6.2 The Boeing model adopted was to spread the design and development to suppliers on a global scale with costs met by suppliers (Ostrower &
Lublin, 2013). A strategy such as this should have been tightly controlled from the outset. Without this control, difficulties in assembly and ill
–fitting
parts requiring redesign added to the delays experienced by the project (Denning, 2013), with hundreds of Boeing engineers sent to various companies
to solve technical problems (Tang & Zimmerman, 2009).
7 Communication and Cultural Risk.
7.1 Boeing management opted to control Tier 1 and Tier 2 integrators and their suppliers using a computer web based system, 'Exostar' (Denning, 2013).
This system intended to provide supply chain and logistics visibility and 'real time' monitoring to control process, development, time and cost. Due to
cultural differences and trust issues with this system, accurate and timely information was not entered by integrators and suppliers (Denning, 2013).
7.2 A Failure to understand the cultural differences with

Boeing Australia Limited
Boeing Australia Limited Executive Summary My decision is to continue on the same course that Boeing Australia Limited (BAL) is on. I feel, after
reading this case study that BAL has been on the correct path with regard to building their systems architecture. There is a need for a more
sophisticated procurement process and the issue of a procurement application may be easily found. The key is the process by which BAL has
implemented all other IT applications, they have been very successful. They are thorough and have processes in place to rationalize whether a new
by–in application or an in–house developed program would be best. My thought is that at least one, if not more; of the current systems have an
appropriate off the shelf... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There would be a learning curve and possible displacement of staff to new positions and or layoffs. The view may be that they are effective and
they will not understand the need for a streamlined process. The job of management will be to proceed with caution to ensure that the knowledge
base and people who have the historical knowledge of the department are not alienated or lost. They are an important piece of the puzzle and their
experience will be critical to deciding which system or processes are valuable. The selection of a new or add–on program is contingent on budgetary
requirements. How much money would have to be laid out for training of staff or does the knowledge already exist in the IT department. BAL is a
small company with 400 employees. The budget that would be required to purchase a new software package could seriously outweigh the need. I
believe that a procurement program will be found within the legacy programs that are in use at BAL. Specifically within the ERP program already
being used, Compass Contracts. There appears to be a procurement module already included and perhaps the expansion module would suffice for
BAL's current needs. BAL already has the interfaces for this program and it is a natural progression for an existing system. Existing program will cost

Essay on Boeing Company
Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to analyse the problems and issues faced by the Boeing company over history and provide a strategic plan for its future
growth and development.
At first this report gives an introduction on the background and the current situation of Boeing. Then it conducts a series of analysis on the factors that
might influence the development of the company, they include: SWOT analysis to discover the company's internal strengths and weaknesses together
with its external opportunities and threats; Industry and competitive analysis which by applying Porter's five forces illustrates the competitive
environment in the aviation industry and the situation Boeing is in; Company analysis– by analysing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
1.3Assumption:
This report assumes that all the data given in the case study is true and there is not unforeseeable significant environment disruption.
2.0SWOT analysis:
2.1Strengthпјљ
2.1.1 Good product at hand:
Boeing's 777 is found quite popular in the commercial aircraft market. It beats Airbus' A330–300 and A340 successfully. By the end of 2000, Boeing
obtained 113 orders for 777, which created a record for single model sales in a year (Velocci Jr. 2000). The 777 aircrafts enjoy Boeing's most advanced
design, with bigger interior space and fuel saving twin jets, carrying less people than 747 but being able to take long–range flights (Wilhelm 2000b).
According to Randy Baseler (n.d.,cited in Wilhelm 2000b) the vice president of marketing for Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, the long range
777 is 15% to 18% more efficient than their competitor A340 models. The climbing speed and bigger interior room are also favorable features. A poll
conducted to airlines in 2000 proves Baseler's argument– Boeing's 777–200 and –300 were found to be top performers among wide body aircrafts
(Whyte 2000).
Airbus, by contrast, only got 103 orders by the same time. The order includes 17 of A340 and 86 of A330. Among these A330s' orders, only 30
–35 out
of 86 were for A330–300– the competitor of 777, while the rest compete mainly Boeing's 767 commercial aircraft (Velocci Jr. 2000).

S.W.O.T. Analysis of Boeing Corp. Essay
The objective of this paper is to analyze and discuss some of the Boeing Company's business decisions using their strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities and threats, also known as an S.W.O.T. analysis which is defined as, "a planning tool used to analyze an organization's strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. (Nickels, McHugh, McHugh, page 216)". This is a very powerful tool usable by any business that is just
starting out, going through a change in direction, or in the process of a major merger. The SWOT analysis consists of a few simple steps which can
provide valuable insight for direction and decision making. This paper will use The Boeing Company as an example of SWOT analysis application. The
Boeing Company ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Outsourcing is defined as "assigning various functions, such as accounting, production, security, maintenance, and legal work, to an outside
organization. (Nickels, McHugh, McHugh, page 257). Boeing was spending more, taking longer, and producing a lower quality product which resulted
in the loss of market share. Boeing went from the leading aerospace company to second place behind the European company Airbus.
Analysis showed that Boeing was having quality issues, expensive labor, and were not responsive to immediate demands from customers. Through a
process such as SWOT a strategic direction change was proposed to allow outsourcing of many of the parts and sections of an airplane. Chuck Agne,
the director for Boeing's Integrated Defense System estimates that "about 65–70% of the content for a given airplane is procured from outside
sources." (Destefani, Jim, March 2004.) The outsourcing in so many different areas has left boeing with the time they needed to concentrate on
customer input, design concepts, and aircraft assembly which have long been a strong point for Boeing. Finding the best companies to do business
with allowed Boeing to produce higher quality products, faster production from design to implementation, and also allowed Boeing to reduce inventory
and the associated management of the inventory. Just In Time (JIT) production with Boeing's new outsourcing partners allowed the company to focus
more on

Strengths And Weaknesses Of Boeing
Strengths and Weaknesses of Boeing (SWOT) The ideal way for any company to analyze their strengths and weaknesses is to review the SWOT
analysis. SWOT stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. By understanding the SWOT model, a company can see factors that can
affect their future. Both strengths and weaknesses are internal to the company. Opportunities and threats are external factors and the company cannot
control these.
Strengths Over the years Boeing has always held a strong presence in the domestic and international market. Boeing is the second largest Department of
Defense contractor. This means that they will most likely always have ongoing business. Boeing also holds many commercial airliners such as the ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(Schmidt 2015) Threats One of the biggest threats to Boeing is its international competitors. Airbus, Bombardier, and Embraer are all in global
competition with Boeing. Lastly, government continued sequestration could limit and reduce the number of government contracts for Boeing. Since
defense contracting makes up a lot of Boeing's revenue, this could hurt the company tremendously. (Schmidt 2015)
Boeing's Competitors As stated above, Airbus, Bombardier, and Embraer are Boeing's biggest competitors. Airbus, a French competitor, is Boeing's
biggest rival on the global market. Airbus has become famous by implementing a digital fly–by–wire aircraft, the Airbus A320, into the market. They
are also known for creating the largest passenger airliner, the Airbus A380. Airbus has also been reaching their hands into the defense contract pocket.
They currently have the A400M aircraft in service. The A400M is a cross hybrid aircraft between the C–17, and the C–130 aircraft. While this aircraft
is only currently used by NATO countries, the United States could one day implement this aircraft due to its versatility. This would mean that Boeing
could potentially loose defense contracts. According to Jon Ostrower from CNN Money, "Airbus, however, maintains an edge over Boeing in its total
backlog. That 's the number of airliners that have yet to be produced and delivered. The two manufacturers

Essay on Developing the World's Largest Commercial Jet
Developing the World's Largest Commercial Jet
In this case, we will be analyzing strategic interaction between Airbus and Boeing, the two leading producers in the global commercial aircraft industry.
In particular, we will be considering Airbus' proposed launch of the A3XX, their entry into the intercontinental jumbo jet segment, andBoeing's
potential competitive responses to this entry. We will attempt to answer the questions: ShouldAirbus enter the jumbo jet segment? If so, how? And,
what should Boeing do about it?[1]
An appropriate analysis of this situation requires the integration of a variety of tools and concepts to which you have been introduced both in this
course and the rest of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To simplify the game, we are going to believe Boeing's repeated claim that it will not build a superjumbo. With this assumption, Boeing's options are
limited to launch the 747X or not launch and continue with 747. [3] Given the players and their potential actions, we need payoffs.
The payoffs for a formal game should be the net present values (NPVs) of the entry decisions made by each firm. To find the payoffs for each possible
scenario, we need a separate cashflow analysis for each scenario where the NPVs depend on the competitive decisions of the rival firms. We then put
the pair of NPVs into the appropriate cell of the entry game for each scenario and can solve the game as we have discussed in class.
Step 1: Find the Optimal Pricing Strategy for Each Scenario
In a particular scenario, if we set the prices for Airbus and Boeing to a particular level, the cashflow analysis in the spreadsheet will tell us the NPV
associated with that set of prices. Unfortunately, if we change the prices, the NPVs will change. Before we can put the NPVs of a particular scenario
into a game cell, we need to know the correct (optimal) prices for that scenario. You can think of this as a two–stage game. In the first stage, the firms
choose whether to enter. In the second stage, they choose their optimal prices to compete in the chosen

Background of Boeing Corporation
Background– The Boeing Corporation is one of the United States' largest exporters and is a predominant aerospace and defense corporation. Boeing is
the world's largest global aircraft manufacturer (by deliveries and revenue), and the second–largest defense and aerospace contractor (Defense
Contractor Ranking, 2008). Airbus is an aircraft manufacturing subsidiary of EADS, a European aerospace company. It is a merged consortium of
several aircraft manufacturers, and is based in France. Airbus is continually neck in neck in competition with Boeing; Airbus winning some of the
features (largest aircraft), Boeing the others (more revenue) (Heppenheimer, 2006; Casadesus–Masanell, 2007).
Legal, Cultural, and Ethical Challenges– The very crux of the Boeing–Airbus conundrum is the manner in which each is able to use governmental
contracts or subsidies to compete. Up until the late 1980s, prior to the merger of several European companies, Boeing was the undisputed leader in
global aircraft design and manufacturing. From the mid–1990s onward, though, Airbus and Boeing have been in heavy competition for market share
(See Figure 1) (Airbus vs. Boeing, 2006). Prior to this fervent "war," Boeing believed Airbus had "an unfair competitive advantage due to the level of
subsidy it received from the governments of Great Britain, France, Germany and Spain" (Boeing Versus Airbus: Two Decades of Trade Disbutes, 310).
Culturally, Boeing is moving to a more globalist approach, outsourcing many of

Boeing and Walmart Case Studies Essay
1. Indicate whether each statement below is true or false, and briefly justify your answer.
a)Boeing Company can increase the threat from supplier power if it vertically integrates with aircraft parts suppliers for its construction of Boeing 787
Dreamliner.
True – Vertical integration is desirable when one firm's investment in relationship specific assets has a significantly greater impact on the value created
in the vertical chain than does the other firm's investment. The threat of forward integration by suppliers, if credible, can enhance supplier power
because either buyer's are forced to accept the high input or risk direct competition from suppliers (Besanko, Dranove, Shanley, & Schaefer, 2013).
b)Value creation by a... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
2. Referring to the Wal–Mart case study provided, answer the following questions:
a)Wal–Mart's success rested upon its ability to offer its customers "Always low prices always". How does such a strategy help it to sustain competitive
advantage in the industry?
Wal–Mart is a cost leader. They have adopted this generic strategy to offer their competitors low prices in order to sustain competitive advantage in the
industry. Wal–Mart has a cost advantage over its competitors, because they are able to create more benefit than their competitors by offering products
at a lower cost and sell more. They can achieve benefit parity, which means that they are able to offer a benefit that is not much less than its
competitors, or benefit proximity by offering a slightly lower benefit (Besanko, Dranove, Shanley, & Schaefer, 2013). Wal
–Mart has strong horizontal
differentiation and a low price elasticity of demand.
This cost advantage is profitable for Wal–Mart because consumers are relatively price sensitive and will not pay much difference for the quality,
performance or image of a product. These consumers will have a relatively flat indifference curve and demand will be elastic. Wal–Mart benefits from
this because they offer lower prices than their rivals. Consumers will be more attracted to Wal–Mart because they'll be receiving a higher value or
benefit at a lower price. Another reason a

Boeing Case Analysis
Lincoln University
Graduate School of Business
Marketing Management Team Project
Case 3: Boeing Company
Team – 8
The five elements group: Derek Dellape : 7551
Synopsis As the largest aerospace company in the world, the Boeing Company employees more than 153,000 people in some 67 countries. The great
dominance of Boeing is due to its 1997 merger with McDonnell Douglas Corporation, an aerospace manufacturer, and its 1996 purchase of the defense
and space units of Rockwell International Corporation, an aerospace contractor. The corporation is the world's number one maker of commercial
jetliners and military aircraft with more than 9,000 commercial planes in service worldwide, including the 717 through 777 families of jets ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Unfortunately, Boeing jets were involved in four fatal air accidents from December 1988 to March 1989, and the company missed its first delivery
deadline in two decades when the 747–400 experienced production delays. These internal problems were exacerbated by increased competition from
Airbus, which was heavily subsidized by a consortium of European companies and governments. Furthermore, worldwide orders of all aircraft by the
airliners declined from 1,662 in 1989 to 439 in 1991. Fortunately, in 1993 NASA selected Boeing as the prime contractor for the International Space
Station, which was called the largest international science and technology endeavor ever undertaken. Boeing was also becoming increasingly involved
in commercial space projects and in December 1995 ten commercial space satellites were produced and launched from a floating platform at sea.
In the middle of 1990's, Boeing began its plan of acquisitions and in 1996 it paid $3.2 billion for the aerospace and defense holdings of Rockwell
International which was responsible for the Space shuttle and International Space Station programs, as well as activities in launch systems, rocket
engines, missiles, satellites and military airplanes. Furthermore, in 1997 Boeing completed a $14 billion acquisition of McDonnell Douglas which was
the world's number three maker of commercial aircraft. The acquisition

Fayol's Four Functions Of Management Essay
Top managers' functions are very important as it can either cause the success or the failure of a business. The successful organization, Boeing, is a
leading aerospace company and the unsuccessful one is the, Swiss Air, once known as the 'flying bank'. Continuous innovation at Boeing has led to its
success in a highly competitive industry. (Valuing Integrity 2014,5) However, a year after the 11 September 2001 attack, Swiss Air folded. Fayol's four
management functions that is, planning, leading, organizing and controlling were used in both companies.(Wadell, Jones and George 2013,7) This
essay will argue that top managers of Swiss Air failed to apply Fayol's four functions of management in their organization as the emergency in flight
taking ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(Waddell, Jones and George 2013, 7) Boeing achieve their goal which was, delivering 10 aircrafts in 2013 (Dominic,2011,13). An arrangement
objective for Boeing is to execute a three–point change method in their business planes section by changing and separating their item offerings,
changing their client connections to guarantee the prerequisites and deliverance are met on time and changing and streamlining their item frameworks
through the Lean+ process. Boeing is centering its new plane improvement endeavors on the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, a super proficient business plane
that applies the most recent innovations in aviation. The Dreamliner will be the most developed and productive business plane in its class and will set
new benchmarks for natural execution and traveler solace. The main conveyance was planned for 2008. (Valuing integrity, 2005) Through Boeing's
new traveler to–vessel transformation project, Boeing helped their clients maintain their organizations all the more productively by offering option
utilizes for more established planes. Boeing likewise reacted to the clients' requirement for all day and all night support by opening the Commercial
Aviation Services Operations Center, which is accessible 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. (Valuing integrity, 2005 However, the September 11 assaults
gave a mortal hit to the Swiss Air, increasing costs to an already debt ridden company.Swissair, since a long time ago thought to be one of the world's
top transporters, quit flying a few hours after its guardian organization, Swissair Group, petitioned for insolvency assurance. ( Greil Michaels
2001)Swissair's cancelation of installments incited fuel organizations to cut supplies and no less than one airplane terminal to obstruct the transporter's
planes. (Greil Michaels

Case study of Boeing Dreamliner
Title of case: Boeing 787 Dreamliner
Critical Facts:
Boeing is the world's largest manufacturer of military and commercial aircraft, which was founded in 1916 by William Boeing and Navy Engineer
Conrad Westervelt in the name of Pacific Aero Products Company in Seattle, which after active participation in World war
–I was renamed to Boeing
Airplane Company (Frederick, 2014).
Boeing produced several hundreds of B–17 Flying fortress during World War II which became the U.S Bomber. In 1950's Boeing faced a tough
competition from its opponent McDonnell–Douglas which was good at manufacturing propeller aircraft. Due to the increased reputation of its
competitor, Boeing entered into the field of manufacturing commercial Jet–aircrafts in a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Because of this tool, Boeing wanted to collaborate its partners planning schedules and progress in work so as to ensure that no delay in
manufacturing. But Exostar which opted by Boeing posed problems during its runtime. Also as a part of cultural difference and due to lack of trust on
other suppliers some of the vendors involved in 787 design did not input accurate and timely information. As a result of this inaccurate information
Boeing had not discovered the problems at the early stages and in a timely fashion (Zhao, 2012).
Boeing during 2003 lost its share value to Airbus which is a strong opponent to it (Boeing Corporation, 2014). In order to regain its value in the
market Boeing decided to design an aircraft by enhancing its customers. So in the process of designing a new aircraft Boeing decided to use
composite carbon fiber instead of regular aluminum to an large extent which had not been implemented in the past. Because of this composite fibers
Boeing estimated to decrease the cost of travel for its passengers and to increase fuel efficiency. But this step backfired in getting air bubbles on the
skin of fuselage and nose during assembling of aircraft which resulted in delay of 787 Dreamliner (Pearlson & Saunders, 2013)
Boeing in the process of reduction in time and cost it opted a supply chain process in which it adopted from Toyota. Toyota manufactures its products
with short development life cycle with minimal risk and cost. Boeing in

Airbus: Success or Failure of the Global Strategy?
Airbus: success or failure of the global strategy?
TABLE OF CONTENTS|
Problem Statement: Airbus: success or failure of the global strategy?2
Methodology:2
Analysis:2 Company Introduction:2 Airbus Corporate Strategy:2 Boeing:3 The essential items to deal with the global strategy (based on the PESTEL
analysis)3 Political:3 Economic:3 Socio–Cultural:4 Technological:5 Environment (Physical):5 Legal:6 Conclusion of the PESTEL analysis:6 Porter's
five forces analysis:7 Rivalry among the industry:7 Threats of New Entrants:8 Bargaining Power of Buyers:8 Bargaining Power of Suppliers:8
Substitute Products:8 Conclusion of the Porter analysis:9
Summary of main strategic options and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Boeing's 2004 sales were $52.5 billion from customers in 145 countries with 30% coming from international sales. Boeing has more than 159,000
employees in 48 states in the U.S. and 67 countries. Their future success is based on a three–pronged strategy of running healthy core businesses,
leveraging strengths into new products and services, and opening new frontiers. Boeing has decided to take a different approach by focusing its
strategy on the development of smaller, midsize aircrafts since they believe that airlines want the flexibility of using smaller airports and travel longer
distances. Their future success is depended on the 787 Dreamliner. However, Boeing considers the introduction of the A350 as a sign of lost
confidence in the A380
Boeing Stock performance (since mid July 2003)
The essential items to deal with the global strategy (based on the PESTEL analysis):
Political:
Since Airbus is a European consortium of French, German, Spanish, and U.K. companies, the EU has a huge stake in seeing Airbus remain a
successful corporation. Airbus is support through tax breaks, financing, loan guarantees, and R&D support. The assistance is given because Airbus is a
huge generator of

What Is 122-4210 Career Profile
Nathan Crews
Mrs. Jones
9/11/17
ACA 122–4210
Career Profile Assignment
Part One – Self–Assessments
Based on the Jung Typology Test my 4–letter "type" is: E (1%) N (56%) T (1%) J (16%)
Based on the Interest Profiler my top TWO interest areas are:
1.Marginal preference of intuition over sensing
2.The others seem to be relatively even.
THREE careers that match my interest are:
1.Aerospace Engineering
2.Philosophy
3.Business
The career that I am most interested in learning more about is:
Aerospace Engineering
Part Two– Research
Aerospace Engineering is a subset of Mechanical engineering focusing on aerospace technologies. Aerospace engineers require at least a bachelor's
degree in aerospace engineering, or a related engineering field. Nationally ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The interest profiler returned a result of Investigative (27) and Realistic (7); the work interest sorter returned a priority for achievement and
relationships. These relate well to many careers in science and engineering, but aerospace engineering is the career I am pursuing. I agree with the
results as, after many years of practicing mindfulness and efficiency in all things, I know myself very well. Aerospace engineering is my dream
career. I have always been fascinated with space and the future of the human race, and when I was younger I had wanted to be an astronaut. Today, my
interest in this field is mainly to ensure the survival of humanity in the face of any potential extinction event. Sustainability practices necessary for
survival in such a hostile environment as space could be applied to many situations here on earth. As well, a sustainable colony on another world in our
star system could prevent the extinction of mankind if earth were to become uninhabitable due to unforeseen events. This is all hypothetical, of course,
but precautions must be taken to preserve our culture and our

Boeing Based On My Real World Job With The Federal...
For this assignment, my decision to write about Boeing is based on my real–world job with the Federal Aviation Administration and the fact that I
process pounds of mail from them on a weekly basis.
Company History
The story of Boeing started in a Seattle, WA shipyard in March 1910, but the company didn't get its official start until July 1916. ThroughoutBoeing's
history, it has been closely associated with military aviation, through its early foray into air mail delivery eventually gave birth to United Airlines in
1934 (A Century in the Sky, 2015). Boeing aircraft and support of allied forces during World War II was a key asset in bringing the war to a close and
kept the skies in the Korean War clear. Its aviation knowledge and... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Finally in 2009, the 787, designed to be the most efficient aircraft ever, made its maiden flight (Commercial Airplanes, 2015).
Competitors
Speaking strictly about the commercial airliner market, Boeing's only competitor is Airbus. Setting the stage for the duopoly that was created,
Rockwell International sold North American Aviation and Rocketdyne to Boeing in 1996 and McDonnell–Douglas was wholly absorbed in 1997 (The
Boeing Company History, 2000). Across the Atlantic, three of the four founding companies that comprised the Airbus consortium (created in 1969)
merged together to form the European Aeronautic Defense and Space Company (EADS). In 2014, EADS was renamed as the Airbus Group, with
Airbus (its airline production arm) as a division of the group (Weiss).
Innovation and Performance Boeing maintains its competitive advantage and market share through trademarks, copyrights, patents, and trade secrets
obtained through steady research and development. Even though the protection of intellectual property is important to Boeing, it routinely contacts and
licenses out the rights to various properties within its catalog (Jewell, 2014). Its newest aircraft project, the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, has more than
1,000 new patents that have the potential to have major impacts on how Boeing builds and designs new aircraft in the years to come. In 2010, Boeing
was ranked

Philip Condit and the Boeing 777
Philip Condit and the Development of the 777
Daniel W. Sobel
Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University
Abstract
This paper of Philip Condit and the Development of the 777; describes the management, and technological changes that Philip Condit made to the
development style of the Boeing Company. Before Philip Condit took over the 777 program, Boeing had been making airplanes in the same fashion as
it had been doing for 70 years prior. Mr. Condit saw the chance to bring Boeing into the 21st century not only with the new technology of computer
aided drafting, but with modern management techniques as well. The 777 program proved to be the perfect testing ground for a companywide change
in the way Boeing did its business.
Philip Condit ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Having the Government subsidize Airbus's development phase gave Airbus company a great advantage (Lawrence, 2008). Airbus at the time also
had the advantage in terms of technology. The fly by wire technology had been in use for some time in the Airbus A320. The two new models;
A330 and A340; also used this technology. Boeing had yet to produce a fly by wire system (Richards, 1990). The industry environment was also in
Boeings favor at the time. Boeing had a history of dedicated customers. The company had been making commercially successful jet aircraft since
it first developed the "707". Boeing was so successful at manufacturing the jet aircraft, that it was one of two companies left making them. This
advantage gave them the ability to be a powerful supplier. The expense of the development process also made it extremely difficult for new
companies to even enter the market. Boeing faced only one competitor at this point; Airbus (Pearce, Robinson, 2003). This was where Philip
Condit stepped in. He had been an engineer with Boeing since 1965; and assisted in the design of the 707, 727, 737, 747, and 757. He understood
how the company operated. One of the first things he changed was how the aircraft was to be physically designed. Previously, the engineers would
design a wing on paper, build it out of wood or foam, and then add it to a mockup of the aircraft. The people designing the fuel tanks would then add in
their

Boeing 787:the Dreamliner
In the 21st century, any company whose ultimate goal is to achieve leadership within its industry, it is necessary that they think beyond their domestic
market and consider global markets instead. By doing this, they need to be able to change or implement their strategy in order to stay as competitive as
they were before, form alliances and partners along the way and outperform the competition. For Boeing, trying to become the global leader in its
industry again meant that they needed to launch an exceptional, better aircraft than their competition, Airbus. They were also relying on foreign
partners more than ever before to get every part ready in time for assembly. With the launch of their 25th model named the 787 Dreamliner, scheduled
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For instance, Nippon Airways was the first launch customer ordering 50 Boeing 787's followed by 60 more orders from Chinese Airlines. With a
successful launch of the 787, not only will they be able to regain industry leadership but also outperform Airbus's A380 model.
Boeing was hit negatively by some economic issues that could have slowed them down in achieving their goal for regaining leadership in the industry.
As their traditional airline customers were facing economic hardships due to high fuel and labor costs, union strife, very high prices of airplanes and
competitive pricing across the industry, it all affected Boeing directly as well. Most if not all of these factors were outside of Boeing's control. Gas
prices were not going any lower and regional, cheaper and Boeing's customer concerns were that the 20% fuel reduction should be the minimum
requirement rather than a stretch goal. Also, efficient airlines such as JetBlue and Virgin America were emerging with their Airbus models. Not only
were these airlines big threats for the main airlines such as United, American and Delta, they were, in one way or another, affecting Boeing as a whole.
In the political aspect of things, Boeing accused Airbus of receiving $15 billion dollars for launch aid which backfired due to Airbus's response that
Boeing is no innocent in receiving tax breaks and money from the American Defense

Benefits Of Cisco 's Strategic Alliances
1.Cisco Systems has a network of component suppliers, distributors, and contract manufacturers that are linked through Cisco's extranet. When a
customer orders a Cisco product at Cisco's Web site, the order triggers contracts to manufacturers of printed circuit board assemblies when appropriate
and alerts distributors and component suppliers. Cisco's contract manufacturers are aware of the order because they can log on to Cisco's extranet and
link up with Cisco's own manufacturing execution systems. a)Explain the advantages of Cisco's strategic alliances?(3 marks) The advantages of
Cisco's Strategic Alliances are as follows 1.There is a extranet bonding of cisco with its contractors who provide the circuit boards which in turn help
the supply of products accurately and quickly as its linked to the suppliers. 2.Cost reduction and increase in the organisation's profit. 3.Increase in the
production by the use of communication and the information technology together. 2.Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), explain why
adopting information systems strategy might be easier in a 'Flat' organization in comparision with a 'Hierarcical' organization (2 marks) Technology
Acceptance Model is a hypothesis of data framework system and it is generally used to quantify the enthusiasm of the individuals who acknowledges
the utilization of new technology. These are generally measured with the aides of the specialists experience, age gathering and this likewise checks the

Boeing vs Airbus
BOOK REPORT BOEING VS AIRBUS BY JOHN NEWHOUSE
This book by John Newhouse provides an exhilarating account of the competitive battle between the world 's dominant commercial aircraft
manufacturers. In the Aviation Industry, there have always been various airframe producers which where competing against each other. Throughout the
years, two of them gained the majority of the market share. It encompasses two of the biggest companies in the world, going to extremes to finalize
sales, and more importantly, to gain a higher percentage of the market share and outmaneuver the other.Airbus and Boeing are seen as national symbols
that receive massive subsidies, benefits, contracts from the EU and the American government. This book gives a review... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES
"The outset of the 787–A350 duel coincided with the worst of the strife and bitterness unleashed by bitter struggle between Boeing and Airbus and
their governments over the subsidies". (Newhouse 43) Subsides were used to aid Boeing gain a first mover advantage into the emerging airline
industry. They were given tax grants for R & D spending or money to develop military technology that could be transferred to civilian projects. Airbus,
on the other hand, was able to enter the market through a $13.5 billion subsidy from governments in France, Great Britain, Germany, and Spain.
According to a 1992 agreement between EU–US and the WTO up to 33 per cent of the program cost was to be met through government loans which
were to be fully repaid within 17 years with interest and royalties, but only if the aircraft was a commercial success. These loans are held at a
minimum interest rate equal to the cost of government borrowing plus 0.25%, which would be below market rates available to Airbus without
government support (Newhouse 46). Thus, from Boeing's point of view, without subsidies, Airbus would have never been able to break into the world
market and compete with Boeing at such a strong level.
Twelve years after the 1992 agreement, Boeing decided to withdraw from the agreement when Airbus had moved ahead of Boeing and was regarded as

The Boeing 7e7
Objectives
The objectives of The Boeing 7E7 case study is to seek the answer for the project question.
Why is Boeing contemplating the launch of the 7E7 project? Is this the good time to do so? How would we know if the 7E7 project will create value?
How to estimate the WACC?
Is there anything else the board of directors should consider in assessing the financial appeal of this project? Why might the board vote 'yes' on the
7E7, when the cost of capital estimate is greater than the IRR? Why might the board vote 'no' if the cost of capital is less than the IRR?
What should the board do?
Introduction
Ultimately Boeing needs to determine if the project will be profitable and if it will have positive cash flows in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Airbus, the market leader, produced planes to serve the short, medium and extended–range routes. Analysts believe that Airbus seemed to be more
bullish on the future of the large aircraft market leaving Boeing an opportunity to gain back market share in the mid–size market, assuming that Airbus
did not pursue the mid–range segment with a competing product. Boeing had a drop in commercial airplanes delivered from 527 in 2001 to 381 in
2002 and needed this project to keep them in the hunt with Airbus.
The board will also have to consider the decades it may take to recoup the costs of starting this project. Development costs in the airline industry are
substantial leading to many years of negative cash flows. The introduction of a new plane is a make–or–break activity for the producers and requires
huge financing capabilities. The development costs and per–copy costs were difficult to predict, and Boeing also faced engineering uncertainty with
the project. The success of the project depends heavily on Boeing's ability to keep the production costs low and actually deliver a more efficient aircraft
than the competition.

Yes this is the good time for Boeing to launch their new aircraft. At this time, the price of raw materials are very cheap caused by unexpected disasters.
Although there's no demand at this moment, but they can still continue making the aircraft. The further information will describe how Boeing can
continue

The Aerospace And Defense Industry
Companies in the aerospace industry require high capital investment and new innovated technology. Some key ratios in the aerospace and defense
industry include the current ratio, the debt to equity ratio, working capital ratio, and capital expenditures to sales. These financial ratios measure how
firms leverage debt, how capable a company is of paying its obligations, and how much a company invests to facilitate growth. The table below shows
2014 financial data for 1,400 large, medium, and small company sizes within the aerospace industry (Hoovers, 2015).
Additionally, the cash flows in the aerospace and defense industry are generally not a concern because contracts are paid based on a percentage of
completion and cost–plus (Hoovers, 2015). A cost–plus contract is when a contractor pays all of its required expenses plus more to make profit.
Manufacturers do not get paid until they have completed and delivered the products (Hoovers, 2015). Another key metric in the industry is the
working capital turnover ratio. The working capital turnover ratio is nearly thirty percent. This shows the aerospace industry is capable of using its
working capital to generate sales. The industry relies heavily on commercial air traffic and military defense spending (Hoovers, 2015). The average
days for accounts receivable sales is 53 days, which is typical (Hoovers, 2015). Inventory turnover is also important for this industry because it is
critical to see how many aerospace products

Air India And Jet Airways Case Study
Financial leasing of Aircrafts: An comparative analysis
Submitted by: Latika malik
INDEX 1).Introduction
2) .Literature review
3) Theoretical framework
Discussion
Case of Air India and jet Airways
4).Data Analysis
Objectives
Research methodology
Data Analysis and interpretation
Findings
5).Bibliography
Chapter 1
Introduction
Air India is the most extensive flight accommodation provider in India withal the flag carrier airline of India owned by Air India Circumscribed (AIL),
a Regime of India enterprise. It is the third most immensely colossal airline in India (after Indigo and Jet) in domestic market share, and operates a fleet
of Airbus and Boeing aircraft accommodating sundry domestic and international airports. It is headquartered at the Indian Airlines House in Incipient
Delhi. Air India has two major domestic hubs at India Gandhi International Airport and Chatrapati Shivaji International Airport and secondary hubs at
Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose International Airport, Kolkata and Chennai International Airport. The airline formerly operated a hub at Frankfurt which
was terminated on account of high costs. However, another international hub is being orchestrated at the Dubai International Airport.
Air India was once the most sizably voluminous operator in the Indian ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...

To Increment total revenue and in an effort to better match the ordinant dictation for each flight with its Capacity, airlines offer a variety of fare
products at different price levels for the same Flight (differential pricing). Much of the rationale for price differentiation prevarications not in
Discrimination but rather in the different costs of accommodating passengers associated with Different requisites. A leisure peregrinator who is
inclined to book well ahead when seats are more yarely available is less sumptuous to accommodate than a business peregrinator who demands

Boeing : A Costly Venture Than Previously Thought
Boeing's attempt to compete with European Airbus company by creating the 787 Dreamliner one that would prove to be a more costly venture than
previously thought. This came down to five critical oversights in the design, manufacturing, and iterative processes. When Boeing was trying to
develop the 787, they wanted to have new materials to lend to better performance and comfort for the passengers on board, yet this will lead to poor
component choices in part to a dangerous battery. This was supplemented by changing to the Toyota Production System where they did not staff the
necessary people to oversee the entirety of the production cycle. Boeing outsourcing to various contractors and subcontractors, they could lessen the
burden on their... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Their goals were not to just cater to one group of flyers like average consumer or business men, but to include all in a new design to accompany those
needs. Their first major milestone was the capability to make the flight to Asia, non–stop and have a cabin to keep the passengers happy and not
exhausted after the flight. To achieve this, Boeing needed to increase their cabin to accommodate more people to about 200 to 300 people so they
can have varying levels of classes such as business class or economy class, to suit each passenger. The 787 would also boast an 8,300 nautical mile
range compared to the Airbus 330's 6,500 nautical mile range for minimum layovers and connections (Hartman 2015, pg 4). The critical component to
achieving such a long range was their ability to cut the Boeing 787's weight by 20% through the use of composite materials and limit the use of
aluminum which gave it a new capability in the cabin. The operator can now control the climate of the cabin via cabin pressure and humidity which
keeps people more comfortable during flight (Hartman 2015, pg 4).
The highlight of the new 787 was its lithium–ion new battery where it would rely on its own power supply to pressurize the cabin, use the landing
gear, power main operations, among others instead of relying on the energy produced by the engine. This resulted in an increase in

Boeing Analysis Essay
Provide a brief overview of the relevant issues and summarize your recommendations.
In early 2003, Boeing announced its plans to develop a new airplane (7E7 & 7E7 Stretch) in a market that was facing a tight squeeze on profits. The
decline in the airline industry was attributed in large part to the war in Iraq, international terrorism, and fear of spreading SARS. The development of
this new aircraft could possibly bring Boeing out of their innovation slump and potentially give them an advantage in the mid–sized aircraft market.
Since 1994, Boeing had not put a new airplane into production and had failed to follow through on two commercial aircraft programs. The company
was in desperate need of an aircraft that would set them apart from ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Boeing had a drop in commercial airplanes delivered from 527 in 2001 to 381 in 2002 and needed this project to keep them in the hunt with Airbus.
The board will also have to consider the decades it may take to recoup the costs of starting this project. Development costs in the airline industry are
substantial leading to many years of negative cash flows. The introduction of a new plane is a make–or–break activity for the producers and requires
huge financing capabilities. The development costs and per–copy costs were difficult to predict, and Boeing also faced engineering uncertainty with
the project. The success of the project depends heavily on Boeing's ability to keep the production costs low and actually deliver a more efficient aircraft
than the competition.
A final consideration that needs to be evaluated is the set up of the Boeing business. It is set up as two separate businesses– the integrated defense
systems business and the commercial business. The defense systems group experienced significant revenue growth due to the war and demand from
fear of terrorism. As stated previously, the aircraft division is experiencing an uncertain market. Analysts believe that Boeing has significant technology
advantages because of the transferability of R&D across the two divisions.

The F-35 Combining The United States Air Force
POSITION PAPER ON THE F–35 CONTINUING THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE DOMINANCE 1. This paper will advocate why the United
States Air Force is prepared to remain the dominant air force of the future due to the capabilities of the F–35. It will discuss the Air Force's aging
fourth–generation fighters and the need for something new, followed by the argument of why the capabilities of fourth–generation aircraft are viewed
as better than the F–35. Finally, this paper will argue why the F–35 is the plane that will make the Air Force the dominant air power of the future. 2.
The main argument made against the F–35 is comparing the aircraft to current fourth–generation platforms in the United States Air Force that have
niche roles. The A–10 and... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The future of air combat does not lie within how many ordinances a plane can carry, the size of its gun, or the amount of time it can stay in the air; but
rather how quickly, easily and precisely it can accomplish these tasks. The F–35 has automated systems that allow the pilot to concentrate on mission
planning, while the very low–observable (VLO) stealth technology allows the plane to enter the combat zone undetected and take out the enemy's
ground fortifications.11 While the A–10 can only fly in uncontested environments and the F–16 is easily captured on enemy radars, the F–35 can fly in
undetected using VLO and drop fifth–generation ordinances with remarkable accuracy. Furthermore, when the major ground threats have been
eliminated, the F–35 is capable of putting on exterior armaments including an additional Gatling gun for close–air support and a mixture of
air–to–ground and air–to–air ordinances.12 Dave Deptula, the head of the Air Force Association's Mitchell Institute, stated "fifth–generation aircraft are
not 'fighters', they are 'sensor–shooters' optimized for different threat regimes, and can perform the roles of "F," "B," "A," "RC," "E," "EA" and
AWACS aircraft of the past."13 The F
–35 is the future of the United States Air Force. 5. This paper advocated why the United States Air Force is
prepared to remain the dominant Air Force of the future due to the capabilities of the F–35. It discussed the Air Force's aging fourth–generation fighters
and the need for

Boeing Market Analysis
The Boeing Company is a major player in the aerospace and defense industry with over 150,000 employees. As of 2006 they led the commercial and
defense aircraft market as the company with the largest total revenue. (Defense News , 2007). The corporation is divided into five separate business
units/services. Commercial Airplanes and Integrated Defense Systems are the two major components. The other three units span control over research
and development, services and financial services; Phantom Works, Shared Services Group andBoeing Capital Corp, respectively. As of 2006, these
three smaller units contributed only 2% of the revenue for the Boeing Company, but played a valuable role in their various supporting contributions to
the main ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It also splits targeted market segments through the use of different versions. The 777, –200LR and –300ER are the long range leaders of aircraft in
service. Boeing compliments this range with a large passenger base and at a competitive price. It has been the market leader in this category over the
recent years, but its market share has recently been cannibalized by the lighter, less costly, more fuel efficient 787–8/9. However, the 777s still hold
passenger capabilities over the new jets' offerings. The –200ER, and –300 models are arranged in the mid–sized competition group, and offer
competitive ranges and passenger capability, but are more expensive than their closest Airbus competitor. (Boeing, 2007)
Competition CompanyModel2006 Deliveries% segmentTotal Unfilled Orders2007 Orders (As of 16 Oct 07)% seg2007 Deliveries (as of 16 Oct
07)Price ($Million)Range (nm)SeatingCurrent Status
Mid–SizedBoeing7671212%553618%9141–1695200–6600218–375Operational
Mid–SizedIlyushinIL–9622%7* est.63%2120–140 est

Implementing Efficient Fleet Planning And Increase...
One of the most effective ways to implement efficient fleet planning and increase profitability is to purchase modern and fuel–efficient aircraft.
Typically, when placing an order for new aircraft, airline companies utilize options, which enable them to purchase additional airliners at an agreed
upon rate in the future (Kodukula & Papudesu, 2006). In this manner, airlines are able to update their fleet and invest into modern aircraft while
postponing the acquisition of additional airliners until the efficiency of the aircraft model and its suitability to a particular market have been ascertained.
It needs to be stressed that, with regards to selecting the most efficient aircraft, different types of airline will utilize different fleet planning strategies.
Thus, non–scheduled carriers, cargo operators, low–cost carriers, and leasing companies will apply different criteria with regards to fleet planning
(Clark, 2012). In this section, the present report focuses on major U.S. airlines such as American Airlines, Delta Airlines, andUnited Airlines to examine
strategies mobilized by airline companies when purchasing new aircraft. In addition, Korean Air will be considered so as to better gauge the current
situation of the US airlines' flight operations by the way of a comparison with a major international airline.
American Airlines
American Airlines boasts one of the largest fleets in the world (Abeyratne, 2012). When planning its fleet and engaging in the aircraft

Strategic Sourcing
Chapter 1 Introduction 1. Capturing The Trends Long before your first bite of a mouth–watering, delicious Cadbury chocolate, there is a long and
complex logistical chain that must be in place to bring this pro–typical chocolate to you. It may not be immediately apparent to the Cadbury buyer that
the ingredients have travelled from other parts of the world. [pic] Figure 1. A complex and diverse supply chain of Cadbury Chocolate Bars The
processes involved in making Cadbury Dairy Fruit & Nut, at the factory in Bournville in the United Kingdom, give a good illustration of how strategic
sourcing is applied in Cadbury supply chain. Table 1. Cadbury Sourcing |Ingredient |Sourced From... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For those missions, the Polaroid camera that was fine for backyard barbeques wouldn't do. Neither would the Nikons or Leicas used by professional
photographers. NASA needed the best of the best. It needed Swedish–made Hasselblad, the Stradivarius of cameras. 4. Lower total cost of goods. Even
with the price of the goods, transportation, taxes and import duties, some goods can be acquired cheaper abroad, at lower cost countries. This is one
of the major reasons companies first consider offshore sourcing. 5. To establish additional sources of supply. Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
That is why we make contingency plans, and that is s why working with multiple suppliers is a good thing. Shoe and athletic apparel giant Nike, is
one of many examples. It contracts with more than 700 factories in 52 nations. Having such a broad supplier base ensure that supply chain disruptions
in one factory or region can be absorbed by suppliers in other regions, and thus minimize the impact to Nike. With globalization being a key influence in
the outcome of sourcing and eventual complete market product, it is evident that with global supply and resources, a manufacturer can tap into the
various options in resources, technology, methodology and lower production costs. However, it is also vital for the manufacturer to

The Risk And Benefits Of Outsourcing Supply Chain And Risk...
The Risk and Benefits of Outsourcing Supply Chain and Risk Management.
How Boeing 787 Supply Chain Issues Affected Other Industries?
Debates between business professionals regarding risk and benefits of outsourcing is becoming increasingly heated with particular focus on risks as
unanticipated costs, potential for setbacks, integration difficulties, quality or benefits as minimize overall cost, focus on other business area, meet
customer demand and flexibility. However, being prepared, done the research properly, hire the right company can bring plenty of benefits to an
organization looking to outsource different aspects of their business. Rudzki, Smock, Katzorke, and Stewart (2005, pg.8) cover the significant
importance of outsourcing as part of supply chain management and acknowledge the enormous role on raising customer satisfaction, driving higher
profit margins, and fueling growth otherwise known as increasing company profitability. To understand how the risks and benefits of outsourcing could
affect the company profitability, extended supply chain and how cost becomes value needs to be study. This paper will examineBoeing 787 Dreamliner
product development and unconventional supply chain supply where best suppliers were considered partners and shared the risks of this product
development.
Literature Review
Krajewski et al. (2016) stated that creating an effective supply chain involves the recognition of external competitive advantage pressure as well as
internal

Boeing vs Airbus
The commercial airplane manufacturing industry is dominated by two large players, Boeing and Airbus. They operate in a very competitive
environment and the strategies of one strongly impact the business of the other.
For almost 40 years, the Boeing 747 or Jumbo Jet, the largest airplane in the world, has enjoyed a monopoly and has brought in large profits for Boeing.
Roughly 10 years ago, Airbus decided to look into to the possibility of manufacturing an even larger and more efficient plane.
Your assignment is to write up a case study on Airbus ' decision to product what is now called the Airbus 380. In your study include the international
competitive environment, the need (or lack of) for a super Jumbo, and the implications on the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It also has a lower cabin noise and the effects of jetlag than the Boeing 747.
At 555 passengers, the A380 's seating capacity represents a 35% increase over the 747–400 in a standard three–class configuration, along with a 50%
larger cabin volume – producing more space per passenger. If, however, the plane is ordered in an all–economy–class configuration, it can hold up to
853 passengers; its maximum certified carrying capacity.
Airport compatibility
The A380 was designed to fit within an 80 x 80 m airport gate[33], and can land or take off on any runway that can take a Boeing 747. However,
airports used by the A380 in commercial service may need infrastructure modifications. Its large wingspan can require some taxiway and apron
reconfigurations, to maintain safe separation margins when two of the aircraft pass each other. Taxiway shoulders may be required to be paved to
reduce the likelihood of foreign object damage caused to (or by) the outboard engines, which overhang more than 25 m (80 ft) from the centre line
of the aircraft. Any taxiway or runway bridge must be capable of supporting the A380 's maximum weight. The terminal gate must be sized such that
the A380 's wings do not block adjacent gates, and may also provide multiple jetway bridges for simultaneous boarding on both decks. Service
vehicles with lifts capable of reaching the upper deck must be obtained, as well as tractors capable of

Aaliyah Thomas Case
The concern for the technical gamble in development of the new 787 aircraft blinded the senior company managers to key outsourcing and
coordination issues. With more than 70 percent of the aircraft manufactured, assembled, and shipped from foreign suppliers it was too large of a
gamble with no quality control or redundancy for supply sources or assembly point. Complete reliance on one source for each key component created
an unnecessary multi point of failure. In addition, the quality control measures were not put into place at the factory location to ensure system,
assembly, and material where up to the contracted required standards prior to departure from the manufacture/assembly point. Other shipping concern
also provided possible unnecessary... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If the public sees that a company is not consistent on deadlines the public will begin to distrust that company. After careful consideration, we have
determined that the best possible options would be to minimize outsourcing at this time, especially dealing with key components. In addition, it is
strongly recommended to hire more trusted management with experience and communication skills and place them in the key problem areas so that
productivity is increased and the functions stay consistent and on time.
In regards to minimizing outsourcing, this is the better option due to the increased benefit key components of the aircraft built in one centralized
location provide and allows top managers can keep track of the progress. Minimizing outsourcing to just non–essential components can synchronize the
company's assembly time and helps keep all the main components on similar schedules, which can help with uniformity.
Another option they can explore would be to add quality assurance managerial position where their key components are being manufactured. Adding
key quality control managers with critical communication skill to manage and keep product on time with projects would help correlate deadlines, so
that Boeing can stay on time and not have delays. This would also create more jobs, which is beneficial to the community as

Airbus vs Boeing: Commercial Jet Rivalry

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from April Ford

More from April Ford (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Airbus vs Boeing: Commercial Jet Rivalry