The Hidden Cost of Fast Fashion: The Negative Effects of Sweatshops

The WorldвЂ™s Sweatshop Essay examples
Printed on clothing tags or the back of most packaging are the commonly found words: "Made in China". Large corporations such as Apple or
Microsoft continue to outsource more of their production overseas to subcontractors in China. There have been various stories and rumors of Chinese
workers being exploited by their wealthy factory owners and supervisors. Working conditions may appear to be improving in China, but most people
are not able to view what is happening overseas. There are hazardous conditions as well as death and suicide in sweatshops that produce goods for these
large corporations, particularly Apple, Microsoft, Dell, and Nike. These multinational corporations are motivated to obtain large profits by taking
advantage of...show more content...
These conditions provide some power and control for these multinational corporations over their workers. The Chinese workers are powerless
against the influence of the corporate executives. They are able to "ultimately set the pace of production as well as the wages of the workers"
("Working Conditions"). Sine corporations may deny any connection to these labor abuses in China. However, with these powers, these
corporations cannot shy away from the fact that they did have some degree of responsibility for the conditions of Chinese workers. Microsoft, HP,
Dell, and IBM are large corporations that produce various computer electronics and accessories such as desktop computers, laptops, and
keyboards. A factory in China's Dongguan City, Guangdong province helps to produce computer accessories such as keyboards and printer cases
for these corporations (Kernaghan). Workers at the Guangdong factory work much more extensive hours than do Americans. They work twelve
hours a day for seven days a week to make five hundred keyboards an hour at a $0.76 hourly wage (Kernaghan). Unlike other prosperous nations, these
Chinese workers are not able to enjoy many days off or vacations. Instead, these workers only get two days off a month and if a worker took a Sunday
off, he would have his pay docked by two and a half days' worth of wages (Kernaghan). It is not fair that taking a day off from a hectic, seven–day
work week
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Sweatshop, By Karl Marx
Exam 2: Marx
In this short essay I will apply the concepts of exploitation, alienation and labour theory of value from Karl Marx's theory to analyze the practice of
sweatshops and the actors involved. Marx's theory about exploitation in application to the practice of sweatshops directs us to think about the
downfalls of an capitalist system that oppresses the poor working class. Furthermore, Marx's theory regarding the alienation of workers from nature
and the product directs us to think about the implications of a system in which mass production jobs are specialized, and its directed impact on an
individual's mental state as well as it's limitation of social mobility. Finally, Marx's labour theory of value directs us to think about the mass...show more
content...
One of the bigger issues of capitalism is the class conflict it creates, which is demonstrated through the exploitative practices of the poor working class
by the Bourgeoisie. The impact of capitalism is having an effects on a global scale. In a capitalist society, wealth is not distributed equally and in the
process of aiding the rich to get richer, in both countries that outsource this work as well as in countries that employ sweatshops, the working class are
suffering. In the simplest economic terms, the more we consume, the more demand it creates, which only increase the quotas for sweatshops. Another
issue within the formulation of sweatshops is the mass consumption of products by individuals in western and developed countries. The products that
are sold on the market are often inexpensive to an individual that is protected by minimum wage and social regulations, which allows for leisure time,
usually spent purchasing commodities and products. However, the individuals in these sweatshops are not provided the same protection, and often find
themselves unable to afford the products they

Sweatshops Research Paper
The Factory Worker Thanks to globalization, labor intensive jobs such as the manufacturing of common items shifts to low–wage countries. Companies
no longer find it necessary to be doing regular manufacturing jobs in a high–wage country, since they are easily and cheaply made in low–wage
countries by sweatshops, due to advances in transportation. Sweatshops are factories where manual workers often endure poor working conditions,
unfair wages, unreasonable hours, and a lack of benefits for workers. Countries such as Bangladesh, China, Indonesia, Brazil and Mexico are examples
of countries that use sweatshops. Products that commonly come from sweatshops are cotton, bricks, cocoa, clothing, coffee, shoes, toys, chocolate,
rugs, and bananas....show more content...
Sweatshops do not alleviate poverty, however, some opinions say that rejecting companies that use sweatshops will leave poor nations in a worse
situation than they are now. 'Sweatshops may not lift people out of poverty, but they help them survive'.–Jesse Kline The Australian Economy
Globalization has immense effects on our diverse economy. It is a controversial issue; some say it may mean development and prosperity for our
country as it has led to faster access to technology, improved communication and innovation. Others say it has led to the destruction, misuse and overall
end to individual cultures due to immigrants and tourism. Globalization has an impact on almost all aspects of a business, as they can no longer
survive without taking a global perspective into consideration in this ever–changing market. Increased levels of transportation and communications
have made customers much more aware and selective than before. The petroleum refining and manufacturing industry's revenue is falling rapidly, with
a decline of 16.7% expected in 2016 alone. It's also estimated to decline at an annual rate of 7.7% over next the five years due to rising competition
from new South–East Asian refineries." The

Negative Effects Of Sweatshops
When people hear brand names such as Nike and Gap, most individuals will immediately associate the brands with fashionable and expensive
designer products. It is no doubt that most people have worn an item with these particular brand names on them. However, many may not know that
under the soft clothing and recognizable brands lies a very different story. Sweatshops date all the way back to the late eighteenth century. They did
not have Gap or Nike, but they had huge textile industries. Back then, they attracted many of the poor to rapidly growing big cities, such as London,
and soon became a common way for low–skilled workers to earn money. Although sweatshops mostly exist in places with third world living conditions,
it affects people on an international level. Today, Cambodia's textile industry plays a key role in the exporting and manufacturing of garments
worldwide. However, exploitation by factory owners, and lack of sweatshop monitoring led to heinous living conditions for garment workers
(Meyers). During the past couple of years, garment workers have started to speak out for themselves, protesting on the streets, but while the wages of
the workers did improve, it came with a price.
A sweatshop is a workplace in which workers are employed at "very low wages by modern U.S. standards, long working hours, and unsafe or
unhealthy working conditions" (Powell). It is a setting that violates more than one federal state labor law, governing "minimum wages, laws against
child

Sweatshops Is Bad
Out of Bad Comes Good
A sweatshop is a factory where workers receive low wages while being forced to work in poor environments. In general, these workshops produce an
abundant amount of the clothing that we wear everyday. However, few acknowledge the act of sweatshop labor, since it is rarely shown to the public
eye. Ironically, many popular fashion brands that we buy from all recieve clothes that are made in sweatshops. Whilesweatshop workers are treated
unfairly in the workplace, fast fashion provides them with jobs and it provides us with the clothing that we constantly demand for. To understand the
topic of sweatshop labor, we must recognize the effects of this controversial working system.
First, we have to consider the conditions that

How Does Sweatshops Lead To Successful?
The author makes two claims to support the idea that cheap labor is needed. In the first claim, the author argues that "sweatshops lead to success".
He/she supports the claim by stating that "every prosperous country" has to under go a "cheap labor" temporary period but in the end they turn into a
good rich economy, like China. Adding on, the author states that, "a country must be able to afford to ban child labor before child labor is pulled out
from under it". In the second claim he supports it by saying that "Third world countries meed the advantage of cheap labor" by claiming that all of
these prosperous countries started with child and cheap labor. Both claims support the argument that cheap labor is needed in order to

Sweatshop
Sweatshop is Conflicts With the Moral Standards
PMP 400
Quan Zhang ( Lyla)
Royal Roads University
Elvira Perrella
March 9, 2015
Sweatshop is Conflicts With the Moral Standards
Green, B., & Norton, S. (2011). Reading. In. W, Anne & M. Laura ( Eds.), Essay essentials with readings (pp. 336– 341). Toronto, ON: Nelson
Education Ltd. In the article, before the research, like many people, the author's attitude was old, but after the research, the author's attitude changed.
The author chose the country of Bangladeshi to illustrate her point that working in a sweatshop can be a positive experience for women in developing
countries by focusing primarily on one country. First, she argued that sweatshops offer jobs...show more content...
I can choose these data and cite them in my paper, and the data will make my evidence more powerful and believable. Powell, B., & Zwolinski, M.
(2011). The Ethical and Economic Case Against Sweatshop Labor: A Critical Assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(4), pp. 449
–472. doi: http:/
/doi.org/10.1007/s10551–011–1058–8 The idea of sweatshop has grown increasingly has been hotly contested over the past several years. At first, the
author reviews the moral and economic foundations, then argues that the sweatshops are flawed, which are the violation of labor right. The author
addresses the question of sweatshops are justified in violating local labor laws. Then the author pointed out that the global market competitions are the
fundamental reason for growing sweatshops. Finally, the author provides some recent literature, which applies to the ban exploitation of sweatshop
labor and offers advice on modifying the behavior of sweatshops. In this article, the framework is very clear. The author mainly expounds the
sweatshops are flawed and against the sweatshop labor. The author not only used data to support their thesis, but also they used others' opinions to
assess the issue and gave the recommendations. The evidence is believable because the authors of this article are the professor of economics and
philosophy

Sweatshops : A Factory Or Workshop
The dictionary defines Sweatshops as "a factory or workshop, especially in the clothing industry, where manual workers are employed at very low
wages for long hours and under poor conditions." Sweatshops typically produce product like shoes, clothes, and toys. These factories are usually
located in developing countries mainly because it's easier to slip under the radar. It is said that "Women sewing NBA jerseys make 24 cents per
garment that will eventually sell for $140." Women predominantly work in Sweatshops and often endure physical and sexually abuse. Despite the
harsh condition and the negative grotesque image of sweatshops fashion designers use them in efforts to save money. If a designer can get a garment
made for $0.50 each then sell that garment for $200 to consumers. The pay given to workers is unfair and unjust, Houghteling wrote in the Harvard
International review, "In Indonesia, for example, where Nike and Reebok laud their recent wage increases in response to the economic downturn,
sweatshop laborers now make US $0.20 an hour, while the CEPs calculated national living wage is seven cents higher." At the end of the day greed
has blinded the fashion industry now a days designers display fewer products for diverse body types in their clothing lines. Alienating others from the
full fashion experience drilling the idea that society look like this.
Designers use sweatshops because they're extremely affordable. Just like anything in life the fashion industry has

Research Paper On Sweatshop
Sweatshop Final The item I researched was Levis jeans. I believe this item is a need in life because, it is necessary we cover our body from the public.
In my dresser at home I have about five Levi jeans that I wear almost everyday. Since I wear jeans almost everyday, I wear one pair of jeans a day.
Bodies grow everyday so with the amount of jeans I have and wear, my jeans should last at least one to one and half years. After that I need to buy
new jeans and with that I usually donate my jeans to Goodwill or hand them down family friends in need of jeans. Borrowing jeans is harder when
you get older because your body is completely different from the person's body next to you. When I was younger I wore hand down jeans from the
neighbor girls

Sweatshops In Developing Countries Essay
Even though some arguments had proven the positive impacts of sweatshops in developing countries, there are also arguments that support otherwise.
Sweatshops allow workers to experience inhuman working conditions and led to exploitation of natural resources in developing countries. MNC's
main objective of profit maximization is the key factor of sweatshops sacrificing the well being of their workers for the sake of cutting down cost to
the least value possible. Chittaranjan Locomotive Works (CLW) did an investigation on some electronic manufacturing industries in China and
discovered that these factories had breached various Chinese labor laws and social responsibility of codes of conduct (PR Newswire 2011). Schorr and
Wong (2013) explained that even though developing countries such as Thailand, Philippines and China have much lowerminimum wage per...show
more content...
This is made worse by the fact that they are not compensated for working overtime after working for about 77 – 84 hours per week with almost no
breaks (Balko 2004). Besides, workers are not protected for their health and safety, but abused and exploited instead as proven by a survey shown
in appendix B. Nike workers from Jakarta claimed that supervisors often abuse them physically and verbally by throwing things and calling them
dogs and pigs (Daily Mail 2011). It is also reported that they are fired when they speak out or when they made a sick leave even though medical
certificate is presented. Furthermore, children are also negatively affected as sweatshops practice child labor. Poor children often dropped out of school
to work at sweatshops. Around 20 – 60 workers at H&M factories at Cambodia are children of age 12 – 14 years old even though the legal working age
is 15 years old (Winn 2015). Despite their young age, no special privileges are given as they are treated

Sweatshops Essay
Sweatshops over the world can be improved through simple and big changes on both the foreign as well as American fronts. Sweatshops have
always been viewed as a negative thing but no one has really tried to change or improve upon them, it is more of an out of sight out of mind
mentality. In the book Where am I Wearing, the author Kelsey Timmerman said " ... is that we should try to be engaged consumers..." ( Timmerman 9
). Society knows it is happening so why not find ways to improve these sweatshops instead of just ignoring the issues at hand. " We live in a turbulent,
imbalanced world. It can be depressing to think about" ( Timmerman 41) By having Labor Unions that are there for the people are beginning to be a
simple way to start a...show more content...
Labor Unions could help to enforce labor laws to improve the factories and the conditions within ( Arnold ). These unions could make up for lack of
government enforcement within the areas of that the labor unions ( Arnold ). Also it does not cost a thing to make sure that people are following the
rules to the best of their ability ( Arnold ). Labor unions are beginning to be created to help with these issues of the factory workers such as their rights
and how to educate people of these rights.
As stated before labor unions are a way to improve working conditions but there are others as well. Sweatshops can make simple improvements by
using scraps around the factory to make simple improvements ( Arnold ). Making improvements can be done in a very simple and low cost ways
especially depending on the size of the company ( Arnold ). In a NIKE sweatshop a worker wanted to use the rubber waste as a cushion for iron molds
so they would not slam against the furnace to hopefully eliminate noise in the work area, they would not allow the worker to do this (Arnold). Making
conditions better will cause a reduction in the amount of deaths, injuries, and illnesses that occur from the poor regulation of working conditions in
these factories.
Still explaining different ways to improve upon sweatshops as well as the workers lives, improving wages is a way to achieve this. This is simple as it
is a moral obligation for the employer to provide decent wages for

Advantages Of Sweatshops Essay
Lageju Krischal 1 Ashley Garcia Casas ESL 400 October 27, 2017 Final draft Sweatshops: worth the price? A sweatshop is the place that has a
poor working condition, where workers are paid very low wage thought they work for longer hours. A 'sweatshop' is defined by the US department of
Labor as a factory that violates 2 or more labor laws. Sweatshops are common in poor and developing countries. Basically, they possess three major
characteristics – long hours, low pay and unsafe or unhealthy working conditions. On the other hands it has been one...show more content...
Sweatshops also helps in developing the infrastructure of the country. Besides raising the life standard of the workers, it also helps in raising the
economy of the country. One of the good things is that companies need to pay taxes to the government which directly help to boost the economy of
the country. Furthermore, a successful investment in poor countries will send message to other potential investors that there is a stable environment
for investment, leading in more investment, job opportunities and prosperity in the country. This have standardized the global economy. Many
technologies are introduced by the sweatshops in the country. Besides it also helps in developing the infrastructure. As these factories need proper
transportation, communication, digital technologies, etc., it helps in developing it. I also agree that sweatshops are not good all the time.
Obviously, there are some bad sides of sweatshops. The first thing is that people need to work in the horrific condition putting their life in risk.
Sometimes it's like your worst nightmare. They are a curse for human rights. They do not care about the workers they are working for side workers
are allowed to work for longer hours without any food and break. They have always been criticized for their violation against child labor and human
rights. There are many cases where workers are abused. They are accused verbally,

Are Sweatshops Better Than No Jobs at All? Essay
A sweatshop is defined as a factory where manual workers are employed at very low wages for long hours in unsafe working environments (Oxford
Dictionary, 2011). Sweatshops are especially associated with clothing industries, such as Nike, Gap, Walmart, Primemark and other brand names.
Sweatshop history begins in 1830 with clothing factories in New York City and London, even then the working conditions were poor, e.g. rat
infestation. Since the 1850s worker unions have improved "sweatshops" conditions in the first world, and the term "sweatshop" is more associated with
factories in the developing world. The statement that 'sweatshops in developing countries are better than no jobs' has many arguments for and against
them, which will be...show more content...
This improves workers standard of life.
Sweatshops are not replacing high paid jobs but rather provide work over farming, unemployment or the more dangerous alternatives of prostitution
or crime, which the unemployed may be forced into. Sweatshops in developing countries are key to the growth of the local economy by creating
more work for individuals. The increased workforce keeps a local economy alive by increasing local's purchasing power, allowing other local
businesses to flourish. Rural areas are in danger of depopulation as workers leave for higher paid factory jobs, and urban sprawl can lead to unsuitable
living condition i.e. slums. The product produced in sweatshops boosts exports in host countries to where the consumer demand is. Exports bring
money into a country, which increase the exporting nation's Gross Domestic product (GDP). Arnold (2005) states; "Exploitation of a national
resource–inexpensive labour– allows developing countries to expand export activities and to improve their economics."
Economist Zwolinski (2011) agrees that sweatshops are doing something to help and the exchange between employer and worker is mutually
beneficial; as companies aim to keep their production cost low and provide consumers with commodities, whilst creating jobs. Internationalization of
global economic activities across national boundaries has led to global commodity chains (GCC), which are either buyer driven or producer driven.
Buyer driven GCC involve businesses such

Sweatshop Story
The sweatshop story is a interesting story because its conflict. It happened in New York City when they teamed up with immigrants. They all had to
come to the united states so they can look for a better life. Manny immigrants found horrible living conditions. Many died of hunger and disease, the
United States economy was flourishing. Many of New York City's immigrant women and girls worked at the triangle shirtwaist Factory on Green Street.
At 4;30 pm. on March 25, some workers began to put on their coats and hats so that they would be ready to leave at 5. But everyone was looking to
having sunday off. At 4;45, a fire suddenly broke out on the 8th floor. Screaming and crying, they raced for the exit doors, only to find them locked.
Elevator

Sweatshops Essay
"Free Exchange for Mutual Benefit: Sweatshops and Maitland 's "Classical Liberal Standard" " Thomas Carson 's article criticize Ian Maitland 's
arguments in defense of sweatshops, based on Ian 's view of "the Classical Liberal Standard" published in 1997, in the Brithish Academy of
Managment Annual Conference Proceedings. Ian 's central thesis, is a defence of the sweatshops in the poor countries in the third world, statinig that "A
wage or labor practice is ethically acceptable if it is freely chosen by informed workers" (Carson,1). The global intercontinental coorporation 's
sweatshops capture the requirements of the CLS and this way they are providing better options and opportunities to the workers in the third world
...show more content...
First, I would like to begin with a description of sweatshops. The name sweatshop gives us a pretty clear description of how hard is the labor in these
pleaces. More over multinational companies ' sweatshop are instituted in and only in third world countries such as the ones described in the article –
Indonesia, China. These countries are poor and overpopulated, suffering form unemployement, and the limitations of employement and poverty among
the people are something common and chronicle, as described in the text. This is a perfect opportunitiy for a big manufacture corporation to build a
sweatshop and "provide" some of the poor people with "sweat labor", pretending to give them "freedom" and options for it, while at the same time
they are limiting, their human rights by providing them with sufficient amount of work for more than 12 hours, a day for example.Yes, Maitland '
give us argumentation, that a begginng worker , earns 5 times more than local wage. Yes, that might be true, but with what cost, this person earn his
wage? 20 hours of labor a day, no personal life, limit of freedom? Maitland based on his CLS, states that if corporations are based on this liberal
standartization and "if it is freely chosen by informed workers" there is mutual transactions between both parties, and this way both parties are
satisfied. I support the idea of Carsons, that in the Ian 's argument, does not bring the etichal issue, or aren 't

Essay on sweatshops
Sweatshops
As companies grow larger and more competitive, they are looking for cheaper ways to produce their wares and increase their profit. That is, after all,
how companies are able to succeed, by giving their customers a comparable product for a cheaper price. This increases sales and the overall bottom line
. Which seems to be a beneficial plan for both the companies and the consumers. That is, as long as the consumers don't know how the product is being
produced. The places that produce these products for an extremely cheap cost are called "Sweatshops". A sweatshop is a small manufacturing
establishment in which employees work long hours under substandard conditions for low wages. Sweatshops came about...show more content...
The wages and conditions of the work environment are good in relation to other opportunities the citizens of these countries have. Not only do these
people now have a job that feeds their families, they are learning skills that may benefit them in the future. The companies may also argue that they are
not violating any laws that the country has enacted. Without the use of cheap labor in foreign markets not only would the company and it's
stockholders lose profits, but the products being produced would be more expensive when entering the United States' market. This in turn would
adversely affect the American consumer.
Fortunately, companies can afford to pay workers higher wages. If this were not true they would not have been able to become so successful with
production in the United States. It is a shame that any company would see themselves as being morally or ethically correct allowing it's employees to
work in a hazardous environment. Companies should want their employees to enjoy the place they work in. This would increase satisfaction in the
work place, which would in turn increase production and decrease employee turnover.
We as investors and consumers should not only act in our own self–interest, but also in the interest of the common good. Companies should invest their
clients' money in companies that want to eradicate sweatshops, to ensure that their products are made in compliance of labor

Nike Sweatshops Case Study
Introduction Over time Nike has become a prominent figure in the apparel industry, yet the corporation has found itself in various scandals due to their
use of sweatshops. The harsh backlash towards the immorality of using sweatshops has led to Nike's image being tainted; nevertheless, consumers
continue to shop in Nike stores. With this in mind, I will explain why consumers continue to purchase Nike products. To accomplish the task at hand; I
shall, define exploitation and demonstrate why corporations exploit workers, provide context into Nike sweatshops, and explain why some continue to
support Nike. In addition, I will ascertain to why some have stopped supporting consumerism, examine how Nike regained its prominence, and present
an...show more content...
With Nike rapidly growing, in the 1990s reports began to surface of Nike sweatshops. In 1996; in a United States (U.S.) magazine, an image
appeared of a young Pakistani boy sewing together a Nike football that shunned Nike (Wazir). Likewise, the next year another report surfaced that
reported that workers in Nike factories in Vietnam were exposed to fumes 177 times over the legal limit allowed in Vietnam (Wazir). Feeling the
pressure to act due to low demands (Nisen), Nike's co–founder and chairman Phil Knight pledged to overhaul these conditions; nevertheless, three
years later Nike came under scrutiny again for their abuse and exploitation of employees (Wazir). Even with the unrelenting criticism towards Nike
(Nisen), the impact of these reports upon Nike's success has been little, as Nike has continued their dominance over its competition (Lutz).
The continued prominence of Nike is due to consumers who have continued to support Nike, as extensive anti–sweatshop campaigns have seemingly
failed in stopping consumers from purchasing Nike products (Bohm and Batta 346). According to Steffen Bohm and Aanka Batta, the cause of the
continued–consumerism with Nike can be understood through the Lacanian conception of commodity fetishism (347). Commodity fetishism was first
introduced by Karl Marx, who defined it as the economic system of capitalism causing normal products such as "tables, into objective, abstract entities"
that could be exchanged on "an artificially

Sweatshops Case Study
Savior from Sweatshops
A large majority of Americans do not realize where the clothes they purchase are produced. Unethically made goods are predominantly less
expensive than goods made outside of sweatshops. With the increase in investigations, it is apparent major brands such as Nike, Disney, Reebok,
the Gap and others are involved in the use of sweatshops. Sweatshops are commonly known for having poor working conditions, unfair wages,
unreasonable hours, child labor, and a lack of benefits for workers. In foreign countries, sweatshops have around 168 million children ages 5 to 14
forced into child labor ("11 Facts"). Labor conditions are violated, and are often ignored by the US Department of Labor. Sweatshops are still ongoing
due to the ignorance or lack of care for the people involved in a sweatshop corporation. With the awareness of where the majority of inexpensive
clothing is manufactured, the public and major American companies should reconsider supporting sweatshops. It is unethical for the American
consumer to purchase clothing from companies who use sweatshops as means to mass produce clothing lines. This is due to the fact that people have
to willingly work in unbearable work conditions, in order to obtain a job which is essential to survival. Workers are given no leverage for negotiations,
and they are forced to accept the sweatshop lifestyle or suffer through degrading poverty. Acknowledged through multiple witnesses, "work conditions
are

Argumentative Essay On Sweatshops
Sweltering heat, long hours, and unfair working conditions are a few descriptive words that Americans use to describe a sweatshop. I believe our
judgment is being misguided by the success of our nation, and it is imperative we redefine the word "sweatshop". Individuals that endure life in third
world countries know hardships that Americans could not imagine. If we were to recognize these economical differences it may shine a light on why
these workers seek sweatshop jobs. In many of these cases, children must work to aid in the family's survival. If these jobs are voluntary and both
parties agree to work conditions, it results in a mutually beneficial arrangement. One of the worst things we can do as outsiders, to help these
impoverished...show more content...
In a column written by Nicholas D. Kristof, he quotes a 19–year–old girl, "I'd love to get a job in a factory, at least that work is in the shade." (120)
This 19–year–old girl is striving for a job that many outsiders are striving to eradicate. In these impoverished countries, families bring in so little
money they are forced to ask their children to seek work so their families can survive. Together with the low family income and the price of public
education, which is about 150 dollars a month without meals, schooling is out of the question for a majority of people. (How much do schools cost in
China?) Families are not in the financial situation to set school as a priority. Therefore, many children are recruited to assist the family in paying for
needs. Americans see child labor as a barbaric act because we have been spoiled with a great system designed with public education being paid for
by our taxes. Many sweatshops allow, against Chinese law, children to work as if they were an adult. Meaning children can work long shifts and
often over time. If schooling is not a financially feasible option for a family, what is a child to do? Since their family is struggling to provide basic
needs the only reasonable option presented to them is to work. While Americans, who do not realize their options are limited, protest these children
working to support their families. Boycotting these sweatshops does the exact opposite of what these

The Hidden Cost of Fast Fashion: The Negative Effects of Sweatshops

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

The Hidden Cost of Fast Fashion: The Negative Effects of Sweatshops