Environmental Biology best presentation | Metagenomics | Molecular approach | shotgun technique | Sequencing Methods | History of Metagenomics | Metagenomics in Future | The Future of Environmental biology | Environmental Microbiology

1. MALIK MUHAMMAD AHSAN JAHANGIR
21-ARID-2999
ENIVRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY

2. SIGNIFICANCE OF MICROORGANISMS

3. INTRODUCTION
• Total number of prokaryotic cells on earth 4–6 × 1030
• Less than 0.1% are culturable
• Yet to discover the correct culture conditions for culturing the rest 99.9%
• Metagenomics presently offers away to access unculturable microorganisms
because it is a culture-independent way to study them.
• It involves extracting DNA directly from an environmental sample –e.g.
seawater, soil, the human gut – and then studying the DNA sample.

4. • Study of metagenomes, genetic material recovered directly
from environmental samples.
• Also reffered as Environmental genomics, ecogenomics, or community
genomics.
• The term "metagenomics" was first used by Jo Handelsman,
Jon Clardy, Robert M. Goodman, and others,
and first appeared in publication in 1998
“The application of modern genomics techniques to the study of communities of
microbial organisms directly in their natural environments, bypassing the need
for isolation and lab cultivation of individual species”
- Kevin Chen and Lior Pachter
Metagenomics

5. HISTORY
• Late 17th century, Anton van Leeuwenhoek :
• First metagenomicist who directly studied organisms from pond water and his own teeth.
• 1920’s:
• Cell culture evolved, 16 S rRNA sequencing of culturable microbes
• If an organism could not be cultured, it could not be classified.
• 1980’s:
• Discrepancies observed:
• (1) Number of organisms under microscope in conflict with amount on plates.
• Ex: Aquatic culture differed by 4-6 orders of magnitude from direct observation.
• (2) Cellular activities in situ conflicted with activities in culture.
• Ex: Sulfolobusacidocaldarius in hot springs grew at lower temperatures than required
for culture.
• (3) Cells are viable but unculturable.
• Norman Pace proposed the idea of cloning DNA directly from environmental samples in 1985
• The first report was published by Pace and colleagues in 1991 which reported non fuctional genes.

6. In 2003, Craig Venter led the Global Ocean Sampling Expedition (GOS),circumnavigating the
globe and collecting metagenomic samples throughout the journey. All of these samples are
sequenced using shotgun sequencing, in hopes that new genomes (and therefore new organisms)
would be identified.
The pilot project, conducted in the Sargasso Sea, found DNA from nearly 2000 different species,
including 148 types of bacteria never before seen.
After leaving the Pace laboratory, Edward DeLong continued in the field and has
published work that has largely laid the groundwork for environmental phylogenies based
on signature 16S sequences, beginning with his group's construction of libraries
from marine samples
Healy reported the metagenomic isolation of functional genes from "zoolibraries" constructed
from a complex culture of environmental organisms grown in the
laboratory on dried grasses in 1995
In 2002, Mya Breitbart & Forest Rohwer, and colleagues used shotgun sequencing to show that 200
liters of seawater contains over 5000 different viruses.

7. Venter has circumnavigated the globe and thoroughly explored the West Coast of the
United States, and completed a two-year expedition to explore
the Baltic, Mediterranean and Black Seas. Analysis of the metagenomic data collected
during this journey revealed two groups of organisms, one composed of taxa adapted to
environmental conditions of 'feast or famine', and a second composed of relatively fewer
but more abundantly and widely distributed taxa primarily composed of plankton
In 2004, Gene Tyson, Jill Banfield, and colleagues at the University of California,
Berkeley and the Joint Genome Institute sequenced DNA extracted from an acid mine
drainage system
In 2005 Stephan C. Schuster at Penn State University and colleagues published the first
sequences of an environmental sample generated with high-throughput sequencing, in
this case massively parallel pyrosequencing developed by 454 Life Sciences

8. • Eg. the Aphid and Buchnera,
• First example of genomics on an uncultured microorganism.
• lost almost 2000 genes since it entered the symbiotic relationship 200–250 million years
ago.
• It contains only 564 genes
• Does not conduct many of the life functions
The deep-sea tube worm, Riftiapachyptila, and a bacterium (Boetius, 2005).
• These creatures live in harsh environments near thermal vents 2600m below the ocean
surface.
• The tube worm provides the bacterium with carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide and oxygen,
which it accumulates from the seawater.
• The bacterium, converts the carbon dioxide to amino acids and sugars needed by the tube
worm, using the hydrogen sulfide for energy
Many microorganisms with symbiotic relationships with their hosts are difficult to culture
away from the host are prime candidates for metagenomics.
METAGENOMICS AND SYMBIOSIS

9. Extreme environments
Halophilic environments Glacial
Deep sea Desert

10. METAGENOME OF EXTREME HABITATS
• Metagenomic analyses of seawater revealed some interesting
aspects of ocean-dwelling microorganisms.
• More than one million genes were sequenced and deposited in the
public databases.
• Groups of bacteria that were not previously known to transduce
light energy appear to contain genes for such a function eg.
Rhodopsin.
• Metagenomic analysis of the biofilm led to the computer-based
reconstruction of the genomes of some of the community
members.
• A model for the cycling of carbon, nitrogen and metals in the acid
mine drainage environment was developed.

11. • The human intestinal microbiota is composed of
1013 to 1014 microorganisms
• Collective genome (‘‘microbiome’’) contains at
least 100 times as many genes as our own
genome.
• About 10 to 100 trillion microbes inhabit our
gastrointestinal tract.
• The greatest number residing in the distal gut.
• They synthesize essential amino acids and
vitamins and process components of
otherwise indigestible contributions to our
diet
GUT METAGENOMICS

12. GUT METAGENOMICS
• 70 divisions of Bacteria and 13 divisions of Archaea described to date
• The distal gut and fecal microbiota was dominated by just two bacterial
divisions, the Bacteroidetes and the Firmicutes, which made up 999% of the
identified
phylogenetic types, and by one prominent methanogenic archaeon,
Methanobrevibacter smithii.
• The human distal gut microbiome is estimated to contain ˃100 times as
many genes as our 2.85–billion base pair (bp) human genome.
• Oral metagenome is also done
Metagenomic studies have revealed that each person carries a unique microbial community in his
or her gastrointestinal tract; in fact these communities have been called a ‘second fingerprint’
because they provide a personal signature for each of us.

13. Low Diversity
6 species identified with 16 S rRNA
10X coverage of dominant species
Leptospirillum
Ferroplasma
Identified genes
ion transport
iron-oxidation
• carbon fixation
N2-fixation genes found only in a minor community
member
Leptospirillum
ACID MINE DRAINAGE METAGENOME

14. Metagenomics
. Scope of diversity: Sargasso Sea
– Oligotrophic environment
– More diverse than expected
. Sequenced 1x109 bases
. Found 1.2 million new genes
. 794,061 open reading frames with no known function
. 69,718 open reading frames for energy transduction
– 782 rhodopsin-like photoreceptors
. 1412 rRNA genes, 148 previously unknown phylotypes
(97% similarity cutoff)
– α- and γ- Proteobacteria dominant groups
Venter, J.C. 2004. Science 304:66

15. • Data Storage:
– Metagenomic Library – 2 Approaches
• Function-Driven: Focuses on activity of target protein and clones that express a given
trait.
• Sequence-Driven: Relies on conserved DNA to design PCR primers and hybrdization
probes; gives functional information about the organism.
•rRNA:
–“Evolutionary Chronometer:” Very slow mutation rate.
–Universal and functionally similar
–16S rRNA sequences used.
•Data Collection Methods:
–Initially, direct sequencing of RNA and sequencing reverse transcription generated DNA.
–Progressed to PCR
METHODOLOGY

16. • the first approach, known as
• The metagenomic sequences are
compared to sequences deposited
in publicly available databases
such as GENBANK.
• The genes are then collected into
groups of similar predicted
function, and the distribution of
various functions and types of
proteins that conduct those
functions can be assessed.
• In the second approach, ‘function-
driven metagenomics’, the DNA
extracted from the environment is
also captured and stored in a
surrogate host, but instead of
sequencing it, scientists screen the
captured fragments of DNA, or
‘clones’, for a certain function.
• The function must be absent in
the surrogate host so that
acquisition of the function can
be attributed to the metagenomic
DNA.
TWO APPROACHES FOR METAGENOMICS
sequence-driven metagenomics’,
DNA from the environment of
interest is sequenced and
subjected to computational
analysis.

17. LIMITATIONS OF TWO APPROACHES
• The sequence driven approach
• limited existing knowledge: if a metagenomic gene does not look like a gene of
known function deposited in the databases, then little can be learned
about the gene or its product from sequence alone.
• The function driven approach
• most genes from organisms in wild communities cannot be expressed easily by
agiven surrogate host
Therefore,the two approaches are complementary and should be pursued in
parallel.

18. • Genome enrichment:
• Sample enrichment enhances the screening of metagenomic libraries for a
particular gene of interest, the proportion of which is generally smaller than
the total nucleic acid content.
• Stable isotope probing (SIP) and 5-Bromo-2-deoxyuridine labeling of DNA or
RNA, followed by density-gradient centrifugal separation.
• Suppressive subtractive hybridization (SSH)
• Phage display
• DNA microarray
Nucleic Acid Extraction:
Cell Extraction and Direct Lysis
Cell lysis (chemical, enzymatic or mechanical) followed by removal of cell
fragments and nucleic acid precipitation and purification.
TECHNIQUE

19. GENERAL METHODOLOGY
• Nucleic acid extraction and enrichment
technologies
• Genome and gene enrichment
• Metagenomic libraries
• Transcriptome libraries
• Metagenome sequencing

20. Gene Targeting:
PCR is used to probe genomes for specific metabolic or biodegradative
capabilities
•Primer design based on known sequence information
•Amplification limited mainly to gene fragments rather than full-length
genes, requiring additional procedures to attain the full-length genes
•RT-PCR has been used to recover genes from environmental samples
since RNA is a more sensitive biomarker than DNA
• Metagenome sequencing:
• Complete metagenomes sequencing using large fragments of genomic
DNA from uncultured microorganisms.
• The objectives have been to sequence and identify the thousands of viral
and prokaryotic genomes as well as lower eukaryotic species present in
small environmental samples such as agram of soil or liter of seawater.

21. • Successful products
• • Antibiotics
• • Antibiotic resistance pathways
• • Anti-cancer drugs
• • Degradation pathways
• Lipases, amylases, nucleases, hemolytic
• • Transport proteins
Metagenomics and applications

22. • – Too much data?
• • Most genes are not identifiable
• – Contamination, chimeric clone sequences
• – Extraction problems
• – Requires proteomics or expression studies to demonstrate phenotypic
characteristics
• – Need astandard method for annotating genomes
• – Requires high throughput instrumentation – not readily available to most
institutions
• Can only progress as library technology progresses, including sequencing
technology
LIMITATIONS

23. FUTURE OF METAGENOMICS
• To identify new enzymes & antibiotics
• To assess the effects of age, diet, and pathologic states (e.g.,
inflammatory bowel diseases, obesity, and cancer) on the distal gut
microbiome of humans living in different environments
• Study of more exotic habitats
• Study antibiotic resistance in soil microbes
• Improved bioinformatics will quicken analysis for library profiling
• Investigating ancient DNA remnants
• Discoveries such as phylogenic tags (rRNA genes, etc) will give
momentum to the growing field
• Learning novel pathways will lead to knowledge about the current
nonculturable bacteria to then culture these systems

24. MALIK M.AHSAN JAHANGIR
21-ARID-2999
Enivironmental Microbiology
BS MICROBIOLOGY 4TH
PMAS ARID AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY, RAWALPINDI.