2. What is Veganism?
• The practice of abstaining from the use of animal products. This definition states:
Veganism is a way of living that seeks to exclude,
as far as possible and practicable, all forms of
exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food,
clothing and any other purpose.
• The follower of the diet or the philosophy is known as a Vegan.
Introduction
4. Logic Vs Logic
Basic Questions/Counters from Meat-eaters to Vegans
• Where do you get your protein?
• Humans meant to eat animals, it’s natural and in our biology.
• What’s the difference between killing plants and killing anima
ls? Don’t plants feel pain?
5. Logic Vs Logic
Basic Questions/Counters from Meat-eaters to Vegans
• Aren’t your shoes leather?
• If you were stranded on a desert island, and all there was to
eat were animals, wouldn’t you?
• If everyone went vegan, what would happen to all the farm a
nimals?
6. Logic Vs Logic
Basic Questions/Counters from Vegans to Meat-eaters
• Don't you care for animals?
• Think of the last time you ate meat. Do you have any idea where ex
actly it came from other than the supermarket?
• Have you ever watched any of the videos on YouTube about slaught
erhouses? That seems okay to you?
7. Logic Vs Logic
Basic Questions/Counters from Vegans to Meat-eaters
• Do you believe that animals are treated cruelly in slaughterhouses?
• Is it moral to take animals lives against their will?
• Aren’t you paying for their murder?
9. The China Study
Conducted over the span of 20 years by T. Colin
Campbell
This study examines the correlation between con
suming animal products and the development of c
ertain chronic illnesses
Concludes that countries that consumed higher a
mounts of animal based foods were more likely to
have higher death rates and presented more “wes
tern” diseases. On the other hand, countries that
consumed mostly plant based diets had the oppo
site effect, prolonging longevity and reducing maj
or health issues.
12. Conclusion
In bringing this discussion to a conclusion, it can be said that though there is a large
amount of scientific evidence that points towards a plant based diet having significantly
more benefits than an animal product based diet ,these studies lack of long term
evidence. Science also allows us to know a non-vegan can also live a healthy life by
consuming a balanced diet. There might be a debate always between vegans and
meat eaters but whether it is possible to imply rules on someone's diet is something to t
hink about.
13. References
1. "International Health Exhibition", The Medical Times and Gazette, 24 May
1884, 712
2. https://www.vegansociety.com/go-vegan/definition-veganism
3. http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/animals/rights/rights_1.shtml
4. https://nutritionstudies.org/the-china-study/
5. http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2015/09/17/441169188/the-secret-to-t
he-inuit-high-fat-diet-may-be-good-genes
What is Veganism?
The practice of not eating or using any animal products, such as meat, fish, eggs, milk, cheese, or leather. Strict veganism prohibits the use of all animal products, not just food, and is a lifestyle choice rather than a diet.
The word "vegan" was coined in 1944 by Donald Watson of the Vegan Society of the UK. There are two kinds of Vegans—one an extreme form, the members of which eat no animal food products what-so-ever; and a less extreme sect, who do not object to eggs, milk, or fish. The Vegetarian Society. Belongs to the latter more moderate division.
As we all know, a conversation between meat eaters and non-meat eaters about food choices can be difficult. And when the debate starts it never ends. So, what are your thoughts on this debate? Are you a meat-eater who is willing to learn about the vegan’s point of view? Are you a vegan who is open to learning about why the hunter hunts? Or are you somewhere in between?
Let’s have a look in their logics.
Logical Answers from Vegans-
Where do you get your protein?
In case of protein, vegans try to counter back meat-eaters asking the same question again “Where do you get your protein?”. When they say that animals are the source of their protein ,Vegans add another question with it, that is -”From where animals get protein?”.
And we all know the answer.
Animals get the protein from plants.
Though there are still room for debate. For example meat eaters would say meats are the source of all proteins that you can get at one time where you have to find different plants for different proteins. Also plants can not supplement vitamin B12 which is needed for cell division.
Humans meant to eat animals, it’s natural and in our biology.
They say we are able to digest meat, however our digestive systems are totally different to carnivorous animals. Our guts are longer therefore we are able to digest plants and our teeth don't seem to be designed to slice and tear flesh. The diet of our ancestors was vegetarian till they began hunting about one-and-a-half million years ago however even then meat formed simply a small a part of their diet. That’s why they live long, healthy lives on vegetarian diets however would quickly die if they ate nothing but meat. Humans have solely ingested meat in comparatively recent evolutionary history then solely through the employment of tools like spears and fireplace.Point is, we don't seem to be carnivores. we are able to survive and thrive on plant diet. Why not opt for compassion?We are evolving. we now sleep in homes, poop in toilets, freeze our food. Would any of this be thought of “natural”? The more we find out about the advantages of not consuming animal products, the less “natural” they'll seem.
What’s the difference between killing plants and killing animals? Don’t plants feel pain?
“Would you prefer to mot a lawn, or hit a pig with a baseball bat? There is a huge difference.”
They say Pain is a lower brain stem function that all animals, avian, and fish equally possess. A cow or chicken or fish can suffer just as much as a dog or cat. Unlike plants, animals cry out when in pain and struggle to get away from suffering. They say killing plants would cause the least suffering and the path of least suffering is always vegan.
Logical Answers from Vegans-
Aren’t your shoes leather?
They may prefer to say no. Adding - Most vegans don’t wear leather, but some do. We all should be striving to make personal choices that will improve our world. Striving is a keyword here. Perhaps someone has chosen to put their energy into avoiding animal products in their food, but haven’t taken it to the level of their clothes. We are all hypocrites to some degree. But if we are not setting our goals higher then we can actually achieve, we become complacent. I would argue for hypocrisy over complacency.
If you were stranded on a desert island, and all there was to eat were animals, wouldn’t you?
They would say- “We are not on a desert island, we are in a first world smorgasbord of plant-based food. Aren’t we lucky that we can choose compassionate, healthy food?”
If everyone went vegan, what would happen to all the farm animals?
They seem to imagine as demand for meat goes down over the period of time, so fewer and fewer animals will be bred. Eventually, the few that are left can be allowed to go free; pigs can root around in woodlands as it is natural for them to do, sheep will graze the hillsides like deer and so on. Their populations will find their own natural levels, just like every other animal.
Logical Answers from Meat-eaters
Don't you care for animals?
The possibility is about zero percent that someone will answer in the negative for this question.
Think of the last time you ate meat. Do you have any idea where exactly it came from other than the supermarket?
The answer varies from person to person
Have you ever watched any of the videos on YouTube about slaughterhouses? That seems okay to you?
The answer varies from person to person
Logical Answers from Meat-eaters
Do you believe that animals are treated cruelly in slaughterhouses?
Very few meat eaters will support what happens in the slaughterhouses. But they don’t prefer to giving up eating meat for that, instead they would say those animals deserve a peaceful death. As we are haunters from the very beginning of human kind ,giving up consuming animal products doesn’t seems to be a logical idea to them.
Is it moral to take animals lives against their will?
They would say yes. Because they are bred and slaughtered to feed humans. Also consequences of giving rights to non-human animals are so limiting for humanity and it would give rights to creatures that are so simple that the idea of them having rights seems to defy common sense.
Aren’t you paying for their murder?
There are a lots of many studies showing the positive edges of eating a vegetarian diet. One in all the most important considerations of those studies is that they usually don't show the long run effects of veganism, solely the short term.While several of those studies do conclude that additional analysis is required to understand the whole effects of a plant based diet. The large amount of studies conducted through completely different universities, institutes and organizations presents considerable evidence in favor of veganism.
Probably the foremost distinguished study on the effects of veganism is known as The China Study. this can be a very comprehensive study conducted over the span of twenty years by T. Colin Campbell, a biochemist and professor at Cornell University, and a team of researchers. This study examines the correlation between consuming animal product and also the the development of certain chronic illnesses such as heart disease, diabetes, and different types of cancer.
The China Study looked at the mortality rates of those diseases from 1973 to 1975 in sixty five completely different countries in rural China. This knowledge was then correlative with dietary surveys and blood work from one hundred individuals in every country ten years later.The analysis showed that every generation, individuals would live and eat identical excess of time. This led to the conclusion that countries that consumed higher amounts of animal based foods were more likely to have higher death rates and bestowed a lot of “western” diseases. On the opposite hand, countries that consumed principally plant based mostly diets had the other result, prolonging longevity and reducing major health problems.
http://nutritionstudies.org/the-china-study/
It is no secret that farming not solely slaughters animals, however typically tortures them overtly to associate degree supererogatory extent. A lot many videos showing the horrors of factory farming, which incorporates atrocious acts of beating, maiming and killing animals that’s not a part of the official mandate. We tend to suggest watching the film “Earthlings”, but be warned, it is extremely graphic.
While the term “humanely killing” is an associate degree trope itself, it's attainable to cut back the suffering of animals in the slaughtering process. Since before recorded human history, humans killed animals to survive within the wild. Consumption of fatty meat In winters was essential to survival back then. Now, in our modern society, we don’t ought to eat meat the same way to help us survive.
Another factor, is that it becomes very easy to disconnect from the spirit of the animal itself when you buy a neatly packaged piece of meat from the supermarket, so far removed from the torture and filthy conditions the animals lived through.
The vegan Society is a registered charity. It is the oldest vegan society. It was founded in the United Kingdom in Nov 1944 by Donald Watson, Elsie "Sally" Shrigley, and twenty three others. Watson coined the word "vegan" to face for "non-dairy vegetarians" who also ate no eggs. The instauration of The vegetarian Society is well known annually on Nov 1, World vegan Day. The day was established in 1994 by Louise Wallis, the then President and Chair. The Society currently defines veganism as "A philosophy and manner of living that seeks to exclude—as so much as is feasible and practicable—all varieties of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, covering or the other purpose; and by extension, promotes the event and use of animal-free alternatives for the advantage of humans, animals and also the surroundings. In dietary terms it denotes the follow of dispensing with all product derived all or partially from animals.