Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to IFLA ARL Satellite conference 2023: Realising equity, inclusion and diversity in the OA movement
Similar to IFLA ARL Satellite conference 2023: Realising equity, inclusion and diversity in the OA movement (20)
More from IFLAAcademicandResea
More from IFLAAcademicandResea (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
IFLA ARL Satellite conference 2023: Realising equity, inclusion and diversity in the OA movement
- 1. Classification: Internal Realising equity, inclusion and diversity in the open access movement: progress on implementing IFLA’s call to action IFLA Open Access Working Party
- 2. Classification: Internal Who we are Fiona Bradley Co-Lead, IFLA Open Access Working Group IFLA FAIFE Committee Member 2019-2023 IFLA AI SIG Member 2022-2024 Director, Research & Infrastructure, UNSW Sydney Library Patrick Danowski Member of PC 2021-2023 Chair SciTech Section 2023-2025 Manager of Library ISTA, Austria
- 3. Classification: Internal IFLA & Open Access Working Party 2009 - 2011 Ellen Tise presidential theme - Access to Knowledge (A2K) 2010 Statement on OA published in response to a request to support the BOAI definition 2017 Global Vision 2018 Start of IFLA new Strategy Process 2018 Resolution at WLIC 2018 General Assembly requesting that IFLA to focus on OA in its strategy and advocacy as a matter of urgency. 2019 GB agreed to form a working party under CLM and tasked to update the OA statement 10 years on. 2022 New Statement published
- 4. Classification: Internal Open Access Working Party ● Evolution of OA since 2010 suggested a new statement required, not a revision. Work began on a draft but endorsement by the GB delayed as IFLA had not resolved the question of open access to its own publications ● Many organisations are working in their own country/sector on open access, the point of difference for IFLA’s involvement is the global voice, and to highlight the contribution OA makes to intellectual freedom, equity, and inclusion. ● The Working Party was as open as possible to everyone many units and countries are represented
- 5. Classification: Internal Current Initiatives Statement & implementation of its recommendations Transformation of IFLA publications Vocabulary
- 6. Classification: Internal Unique points from the IFLA statement Intellectual freedom Inclusive approach Many routes to OA Equity
- 7. Classification: Internal Where do we go next? ● Open Access Working Party high-level session and meeting during the WLIC ● The work continues – proposal to the Governing Board for a formalised structure, such as an advisory committee ● Focus areas likely to be open science/open scholarship/research, equity ● Terminology: Open Science & Open Knowledge & Open Scholarship & Open Research
- 8. Classification: Internal We acknowledge all the contributions of Working Party members including Fiona Bradley Susan Reilly Ellen Tise Patrick Danowski Juan Miguel Palma Lilly Hoi Sze Ho Sara Benson Ann Okerson Christos Varvantakis Ursula Arning Alwaleed K. Alkhaja Tina Baich Anke Beck Lidia Uziel Andrea Wirth Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe Karin Byström Takashi Nagatsuka Wathmanel Seneviratne Stephen Wyber Matt Voigts … and other colleagues – thank you!
- 9. Classification: Internal Discussion starter Views from Europe & Australia
- 10. Classification: Internal Different Views: Europe (Diverse Landscape) Northern Europe: Some strong supporter of OA 2020 & TA France & Belgium: Bibliodiversity TA not supported South Europe: Focus on Green Road Many funders support Coalition S Situation in Austria: Early adaptor of TA, 15 consortia TAs + local ISTA: 90% OA (gold + green) TA help us to make OA easy but we can aford that New option gets more investigated : Rights Retension Strategy Past “Conflict“: Different definitions what is Open Access Common Goal: 0 Embargo Trend: More inatives to monitor OA developement Data about OA gets more Important
- 11. Classification: Internal Different Views: Australia • Rapid change in the sector - recent French review of academic freedom, Universities Accord, Science priorities, OA2020 regional workshop • Visibility of Australian research in global publishing systems can be a challenge - this spans political ‘area studies’ to indigenous research, law, to biodiversity • Indigenous data sovereignty and intellectual property considerations • Inclusive: Strong commitment to diversity of approaches and open initiatives • Equity: Long favoured repository-based approach to OA but this is shifting. Strong focus on rights retention and repository advocacy. Read & Publish agreements still very new. Chief Scientist consultation • Strong open access advocacy group and training - Open Access Australasia • Focus on rights retention • My institution, UNSW Sydney has first OA policy including rights retention, similar now in place at QUT. Others seeking to adopt • OER collective via Council of Australian University Librarians
- 12. Classification: Internal There is an opportunity for all of us (as part of IFLA) to participate in and drive conversations and seek solutions ● What does this look like for you? ● What are the key questions in your country and region? ● What are your views on where IFLA should go on this topic? ● How can we find a common ground?