What is greenwashing and how can you avoid it Digital PR communications
1. WHAT IS GREENWASHING
AND HOW CAN YOU AVOID IT IN PR
COMMUNICATIONS?
CHARITY SWALES
SENIOR DIGITAL PR EXECUTIVE
CONNECTIVE3
2. THESE
SLIDES
1. What is greenwashing and how can you spot
it within marketing?
2. Antecedents and drivers to greenwashing
activity
3. How greenwashing can be harmful to your
brand
4. How and why you should avoid greenwashing
within your digital PR campaigns
COVER…
3. W H A T I S G R E E N W A S H I N G ?
SO, FIRST OF ALL…WHAT IS
GREENWASHING?
Greenwashing refers to “tactics that directly mislead
consumers through a disparity between the
symbolic and substantive environmental actions of
corporate-level activities and marketing
communications.”
Basically, this is when a company pushes
communications on sustainability without having
the actions to back it up – all foam, no beer!
4. I PROMISE I AM NOT A HYPOCRITE, HERE IS WHY I FEEL I HAVE AUTHORITY TO
COMMENT ON THIS SUBJECT…
Sustainability is a large part of my
lifestyle. From being a raging vegan, to
shopping secondhand, I try to live as
sustainably as I can!
I have put A LOT of research into the
subject over the years even writing a
15,000-word analysis on greenwashing in
marketing for my master's dissertation
5. SO, WHAT CAN PUSH BRANDS
TO GREENWASH?
Top-level pressure – Media subject
matter can encourage corporations to
implement symbolic environmental
practices often without substantially
delivering them.
Consumer pressure – Businesses are
influenced to communicate according to
the perceptions of audience
expectations of them.
Relevancy – Environmental awareness
days are tempting to jump on for
building relevant coverage.
H O W T O S P O T G R E E N W A S H I N G
6. H O W T O S P O T G R E E N W A S H I N G
SOME KEY GREENWASHING
TACTICS TO LOOK OUT FOR
• A brand’s corporate social responsibility (CSR)
efforts fail to mirror the conversation they are
starting.
• Look for green buzzwords such as 'cleaner' or
'sustainable’
• In product PR companies often use phrases such
as ‘70% recycled plastic’ or ‘green materials’.
• Are the claims verified by a third-party?
7. H O W T O S P O T G R E E N W A S H I N G
SPOTTING GREENWASHING
8. WHAT ARE THE NEGATIVE EFFECTS
OF GREENWASHING?
HIGHER SCRUTINY
• Sustainable marketing
communications which don’t
align with internal activity, can
lead to a higher level of
scrutiny on their actions in the
media.
LOWERS BAND TRUST
• Greenwashing activity has
been shown to negatively
correlate with brand attitude
(Leonidou and Skarmious,
2019) and can also have a
negative effect on consumer
trust.
• 1 in 3 consumers state that
they stopped purchasing from
certain brands because they
had ethical or sustainability
concerns about them (Deloitte,
2022)
PURCHASE INTENTION
• Companies can have legal
action taken against them for
misleading consumers with eco-
friendly claims.
FINANCIAL RISK
9. MARKETING PRE -
SOCIAL MEDIA
MARKETING IN THE
SOCIAL MEDIA AGE
• One way
• Brand to consumer
• Brand controls the
conversation
• Choice = buy/not buy
• Two-way
• Consumer to firm
• Consumer can “hunt”
• Consumer wants to/can impost
their point of view
IN THE AGE OF SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS HAVE MOVED
FROM LINEAR TO ‘PINBALL’ LIKE
10. THIS MEANS WORD SPREADS FAST IF YOUR
BRAND IS BEING MISLEADING IN THEIR
GREEN COMMUNICATIONS
Boohoo Greenwashing - +586% Mercedes Greenwashing -+320%
Shein Greenwashing -+243%
*Insights taken from keywordtool.io in October 2022
11. IN FACT, STUDIES HAVE
SHOWN AN INCREASE
INTERST IN THE
GREENWASHING
TOPIC WITHIN THE
MEDIA
*Insights taken from a study by Commetric in May 2022
12. IN FACT, THERE ARE
OVER 87 MILLION
VIEWS UNDER THE
HASHTAG
#GREENWASHING ON
TIKTOK
14. CASE STUDY: BOOHOO X KOURTNEY KARDASHIAN
While 41 of the 45 products included in the new range contained
a percentage of recycled fibres, the collection itself makes up
less than 0.1% of products available on the Boohoo website.
Kourtney Kardashian was the wrong celebrity/influencer to pick
as their sustainability ambassador for a number of reasons:
• Inauthentic voice – Is Kourtney really someone who’s
personal brand is representative of sustainability
issues?
• Reputation of excess– Encourages mass-production and a
culture of disposability.
• Lack of education– When quizzed on greenwashing Kourtney
asked her followers for education on the subject.
15. C A S E S T U D Y : B O O H O O X K O U R T N E Y K A R D A S H I A N
SO HOW DID THE INTERNET REACT?
Negative sentiment towards the Boohoo brand reached almost 33%
from online conversation.*
*Insights based on data from Linkfluence in October 2022
16. AND A MORE POSITIVE EXAMPLE
OF GREEN MARKETING…
17. CASE STUDY: PATAGONIA
Patagonia contributes to climate change concerns and
seeks to find more environmentally friendly ways to make
their products.
The Common Threads Recycling Program encourages
customers get more use out of things they’d already
bought.
For the previous five years, Patagonia has maintained or
improved on its “outstanding” rating as a certified B
Corporation (151).
The company frequently gives millions of dollars to
projects that encourage sustainable farming techniques,
conservation of endangered species, and forest
restoration.
19. SO, WHY SHOULD WE CONSIDER THIS IN OUR DIGITAL PR
COMMUNICATIONS?
AUTHENTICITY
If the intention seems
inauthentic and
journalists or audiences
read your story and
discover greenwashing,
this could lower their
trust in your brands
future communications.
HIGHER SCRUTINY
When aiming for KPI’s it
might be tempting to jump
on relevant days such as
Earth Day or World
Recycling Day. But remember
these publications have a
readership (who also have
access to the internet).
BRAND AWARENESS
Digital PR is about more
than securing backlinks.
We want to foster a
positive and consistent
brand personality that
connects with their
audience’s interests and
values.
20. FACTORS TO CONSIDER WHEN PLANNING DIGITAL
PR CAMPAIGNS
First thing’s first, you should always make sure
you are fully aware of your brand’s internal
sustainability efforts.
When planning a campaign around sustainability
ask yourself:
1. What are your target audience’s ethics and
values?
2. Are your audience or publication’s audience
likely to scrutinise any disingenuous green
marketing efforts?
3. Does the campaign align with the brand values
and corporate activity?
4. Are the claims you are making in the campaign
valid?
21. KEY TAKEAWAYS
• Greenwashing tactics often occur with
good intentions, but can have a
harmful effect on your brand.
• Consider campaigns beyond securing
backlinks and look at the wider scope
greenwashing could have in the long
run.
• Make sure you are fully aware of the
brand you are representing’s CSR and
environmental efforts
• When approaching brainstorming make
sure you consider whether the brand
has the authority to comment on these
issues, whether the data or story is
valid and whether it appeals to your
audience.
• At agency level it is OKAY to push
back if we think an approach will be
damaging to our client’s brand.
23. THANK
YOU
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS,
YOU CAN GET IN TOUCH HERE:
@chrtyswls
@chrtyswls
linkedin.com/in/charity
swales/
Editor's Notes
I am going to cover something I think is a very relevant topic within the Digital PR industry and in wider marketing, and a subject matter that has dominated the media in the recent years and is something I feel we as an industry need to be more sensitive to in the future. Just a PSA: this is not going to be me getting on my soapbox and preaching, and any brands mentioned are just to highlight examples, it is just something I think is worth considering within our industry.
To begin I’m just going to begin with an introduction to the greenwashing phenomenon, just what exactly it is and how we can spot it within marketing. I’m going to take a holistic approach at first and then go into how we can apply it to Digital PR.
So first of we will look at what exactly the phenomenon is for those of you don’t know. Followed by antecedents and drivers.
How greenwashing can be harmful to your brand
How and why we should avoid it in our Digital PR campaigns
So to get the elephant out the room (as Alexandra Burke once pioneered), I just want to point out a few reasons why I feel I have the authority to comment. First off I am a raging Vegan and sustainability is a massive massive part of my lifestyle. I try to live as sustainable as I can and (but it’s worth remembering nobody’s perfect) I have put A LOT of research into the subject over the years and even wrote a 15,000 word analysis on the topic (let me tell you I did not look so pretty afterwarda)
So you might be thinking why on earth would brands talk about what exactly can push brands to greenwash? So first of all it can be top level pressure, you’d be surprised but often brands find it easier to implement symbolic environmentalism such as media communications, without ever changing anything. And this can make sense with business models such as fast fashion and the oil and gas industry.
Consumer pressure, so as brands we often want to connect with our audience and their interests and if
So to visualize this here are a few examples of spotting greenwashing within marketing. So often buzzwords such as ‘conscious’ and ‘sustainable’ that don’t really carry much meaning are put into campaigns which we can see here with H&M’s conscious collection which they actually just means some of their plastics are recycled. From KLM we have be a hero fly c2zero which they were sued for this due to leading their consumers to believe they had emissionless flights. And then into social media we have shell which tried to encourage social engagement by creating this poll despite being one of the most polluting in the world. Coca cola here is an example of symbolic environmentalism due to the association with the colour green, that makes it think it’d
So why can this be bad? First of all perceived greenwashing can have a negative effect on scrutiny, it puts a magnifying glass to their corporate level efforts and what they are actually doing for the environment so a discrepancy can actually show this more. It can also lower brand trust as studies such have shown that greenwashing activity can actually have a negative correlation with brand attitude and effect consumer trust.
In the social media era we as consumers have more access to information than ever before – sustainability reports, exposes and figures are literally at our fingerprints with a few clicks of the button. So this actually means as consumers and online communities can share conversations about brands widely (and virallySo to magnify this claim I just want to go back to how marketing is in the social media age. We have moved from linear where the conversation is controlled by the brand
This means that word can spread faster if you are greenwashing. So to exemplify this here are some examples of the brands which have had the biggest increase in search for greenwashing and have all recently had campaigns which have magnified this. For example Boohoo who recently brought out the sustainable collection with Kourtney Kardashian and Mercedes who use the nature or nothing ads to
So just to magnify why this is topical we just need to look at how much it has increased in recent years in 2021 there was 75,481 articles written about greenwashing worldwide increasing by over 11 times the number of articles in two years and this has had an effect with 87 million views under the hashtag on TikTok
Boohoo was named as one of the least sustainable fashion brands in the UK in a report published by the Environmental Audit Committee in 2019.
In an attempt turn the negative press on fast-fashion on its head Boohoo released a ‘sustainable line’ with Kourtney Kardashian heading up the campaign as their ‘sustainability ambassador’.
The fashion brand uploads around 700 pieces of new clothes on the site per week.
User generated tweets picked up on the discrepancy between Kourtney Kardashian’s lifestyle and the collection’s sustainability promises. It was posited as virtue signaling.
Boohoo this year issued a profit and sales warning, which can likely be attributed to the cost-of-living crisis but may signal a changing attitude to the way people purchase clothing.
Higher level of scrutiny as a number of think piece articles from The Guardian to VICE looked in to the collections claims vs Boohoo’s actual sustainability efforts.