Nuclear Weapons &Amp; Nuclear Warfare Essay

Nuclear Weapons & Nuclear Warfare Essay
Nuclear Weapons & Nuclear Warfare
Throughout half the century of the 19's hundreds a period of new advancements in the creations of a bomb had arisen. On August 8th, 1939
President Roosevelt received a letter from Albert Einstein which ended up being the fundamental support in the creation of the Atomic Bomb. There
are two types of atomic bombs fusion and fission, the first atomic bomb was created in 1939 by the Manhattan Project, three weeks later after its
first test, it was used in an actual war. It's capable of wiping out a whole entire city and killing instantly anyone in its way. Now we have better more
precise bomb know as hydrogen bombs, these bomb use the energy released when the nuclei of a hydrogen come...show more content...
The two types of nuclear energy would be fission and fusion. As for nuclear fission it gets its energy from the collision of atoms with other atoms
breaking apart with heavy elements such as plutonium or uranium releasing vast energy. Scientist were quick to realize that they could create a
better most efficient more precise bomb, this would be known as the fusion bomb this bomb would acquire its energy when two nuclei of two atoms
combine or fuse together with gases, such as tritium and deuterium. The bomb used on Hiroshima has the energy equivalent to 15,000 tons of TNT.
The one used on Nagasaki was named the "Fat Man" for its more power, being able to produce the energy equivalent to 21,000 tons of TNT. There
are now bombs capable of producing much more power, but are not fueled by nuclear energy
With great achievements came problems, and that is exactly what happen in the early 1940–2007. In 1942 the Manhattan project was established to
produce the first atomic weapon, this project created a whopping 100,000 jobs, costing 2 billion, equivalent to 25 billion in today's money. On august
6, 1945 the us drops a uranium bomb over Hiroshima killing over 140,000, following a second bomb being dropped on Nagasaki. On august 29, 1949
the Soviet Union would be the second nation to successfully create and test a nuclear weapon. In the late 1950's the UK test its first nuclear weapon,
later the next month the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Nuclear Weapons And Its Effects On The World
In August 1942, the United states employed 130,000 people and funneled 2 billion dollars into the production of the world's first nuclear weapons:
atomic bombs that would later be used to devastate the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, effectively ending World War I. Since then,
several countries have effectively worked with nuclear weapons and developed arms of their own. Currently, there are an estimated 15,000 nuclear
weapons in the world today, with 2,000 active and ready to launch. While they were made in effort to keep nations safe, these arms are exceptionally
perilous and carry a multitude of drawbacks with them. Because nuclear weapons require large sums of money in order to be created and maintained,
leave long–lasting negative effects on the environment when used, and destroy countless human lives, they do not make the world safer. Over the
years, a myriad of money has been spent by numerous countries to develop, innovate and maintain nuclear weapons. For example, when the United
States was first developing their nuclear arms from 1940–1996, they expended a minimum of 5.8 trillion dollars building the weapons and preparing to
use them. Even now, they average about 20 billion dollars per year solely on the weapon's upkeep. Additionally, including the US, the top eight
countries involved in nuclear development spent a total of almost 105 billion dollars in 2011 on their weapons. This considerable sum of money could
aid an innumerable amount problems

The Effects Of Nuclear Weapons
When nuclear weapons were created everyone was amazed by it. It was a huge accomplishment. The first nuclear weapons were used in the cold
war. Soon after that they were used in about every war. Till this day they are still used because it helps not having wars go on for so long but is it
worth causing all this damage?
No doubt about it nuclear weapons are the most dangerous weapons on earth. It can kill millions and destroy a whole city. Even the survivors of the
nuclear weapons soon die later on because of the radiation. There really is no way of getting out alive when it comes to nuclear weapons. They
because so much damage that it takes so many years just to clean up the mess which is the nuclear waste. Just about all anything that comes close to
nuclear weapons get effect really badly. What is effected the most it the environment. Nuclear weapons is no joke, once used it changes everything.
Nuclear weapons are made by plutonium, a man made element, that is produced in nuclear reaction. What plutonium is, its transuranic radioactive
chemical? Which is why nuclear weapons contain so much radiation. Enrico Fermi was the main one to make all of this making possible, basically
making the plan go through. Although Albert Einstein was the main one of the process of making the nuclear weapons created.
Nuclear weapons isn't something any country can have. It takes a lot to have one, to update, to even maintain. The cost of a nuclear weapon is extremely

Persuasive Essay On Nuclear Weapons
On August 6th, 1945 nearly 80,000 people lost their lives instantly in the bombing of Hiroshima. Three days later more than 70,000 people died
instantly with the bombing of Nagasaki (Hall). Those two events remain the only two times in history where nuclear weapons were used in warfare.
Less than twenty years later the U.S.S.R tested a nuclear bomb that recorded an explosion 3,333 times as powerful as the ones dropped on Hiroshima
and Nagasaki (Bennett). The immense amount of destruction that could be caused by these weapons is why the great powers of the world should
come together and decided to destroy their nuclear arsenals. Nuclear weapons could easily render the entire race extinct and it is terrifying to think that
many countries have the power to cause a nuclear fallout. Nuclear disarmament would not be easy, it would be very expensive, time–consuming and
nerve–racking. A nuclear warhead on average costs the government about $55 million. This may seem like a lot but the U.S currently has nearly
7,000 nuclear weapons. If you included production and storing costs of all those nukes the U.S has spent about $5.8 Trillion on its current arsenal
("The Cost of U.S Nuclear Weapons"). That's an insanely large amount of money. You might be wondering if it cost that much just to get and hold on
to those nukes it must be incredibly expensive to disarm all those nukes. Not really, it would cost roughly $7 billion a year per decade to begin
disarming our current nuclear

Nuclear Weapons Essay
Exam 3 Nuclear weapons play a significant role in our understanding of international relations. As seen in the class lecture slides, states often embark
on nuclear weapons programs to counterbalance the power of other states. This is particularly true for states such as China and Iran, who are trying to
balance the power of the United States. States such as China, Russia, and the United States are all powerful international influences. This is partially
due to the fact that they are a part of the United Nations Security Council and own nuclear weapons. If they did not have nuclear weapons, it is hard
to gauge if they would be as powerful world leaders in militaristic terms if they did not have nuclear weapons. These nuclear weapons act...show more
content...
This is an international treaty that aims to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and technology surrounding it. This treaty also aims to promote the
peaceful use of nuclear energy, as well as disarming nuclear weapons all together. There is a total of 191 states in the treaty. China, France, Russia, the
United Kingdom, and the United States are all permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. This treaty is what allows for some states
to have nuclear weapons. Other states, such as developing nations also do not have the funds or technology to create nuclear weapons. Personally, I
cannot envision a world with without nuclear weapons. However, I can imagine a world with many more states with nuclear weapons. I think that that
is a much more feasible future due to the actions of our past. I support states sharing the technology to create nuclear weapons, so that each state is on
a level playing field. If the states that do not have nuclear weapons (or the technology to create them) were hit, they would be devastated with little to
no way to retaliate. If the technology was shared, nuclear weapons could act more offensively, in the manner that states would not launch them
knowing that once they did they would be hit right back. Nuclear weapons play a significant role in our understanding of international relations. They
are the weapons that shape the most powerful governments in the world. These weapons act most often offensively because they are

Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons Essay
Since nuclear weapons came into production, the question regarding their abolition has been on the minds of many global citizens. Nuclear weapons
are described as being, "... the most destructive, inhumane and indiscriminate weapons ever created. Both in the scale of the devastation they cause,
and in their uniquely persistent, spreading, genetically damaging radioactive fallout" (icanw.org,n.d.). Their disastrous nature would make anyone
think that the answer should be a unanimous "yes", but in fact that is not the case, and this essay will examine why. This essay will argue from a
Liberal perspective that despite it being difficult to abolish nuclear weapons for good, it is in fact possible, as well as arguing in favour of their complete
...show more content...
Why should the US government's attempt at exerting its power have an affect on the lives of babies who know nothing about their country's history, yet
they are still paying the ultimate price. These figures do not take into account the amount of animals killed and their habitats destroyed through testing
regimes in deep–sea waters. It is not certain how many animals are killed, but it is estimated that over 300,000 animals have died "as a result of
military experimentation" (Linzey, 2013 p.188). One human's life lost and one animal's life lost is two too many. State governments choose to test in
waters perhaps because they knew the severe knock on affect it could have on humans, as it is predicted that the testing carried out between the years
of 1945 and 1980 which will approximately 2.4 million civilians (icanw.org,n.d.). The past can still kill our future generations, why do we not stop
this now by abolishing nuclear weapons, before we wipeout our entire planet? As Doyle exclaims, through the abolition of nuclear weapons we have
the chance to respect those have died as a result, (Doyle, 2013, p.29). This would show that as an International political system we have thought about
the needs of civilians first and foremost, and not about power and status. President of South Africa, Jacob Zuma states that, "there can be no safe hands
for nuclear weapons"

Nuclear Weapons Research Paper
Nuclear Weapons
A Nuclear weapon is any weapon that gets its destructive power from the transformation of matter in atoms into energy. They include missiles, bombs,
artillery shells, mines and torpedoes. Another name for nuclear weapons are
Atomic bombs or Hydrogen bombs. The United States was the first country to ever use a Nuclear weapon in battle against Japan.
The major arguments for a test ban was first proposed in the 1950Г•s.
Today, however, the stopping of radioactive fallout and the superpower arms race are still in negotiation. Nations have sought to limit the testing of
nuclear weapons to protect people and the environment from nuclear radiation and to slow...show more content...
They find their reason as a lame excuse to start setting off explosions again. The treaty plays a very important role in creating a barrier to stop the
spread of nuclear weapons. The two biggest problems are with nuclear weapons nowadays is that testing isnГ•t necessary to develop a workable,
Hiroshima–type fission bomb in this age of computers and wide spread access to nuclear data, and India nor Pakistan, the two most worrisome nuclear
powers is likely to sign any deal at all.
The United States, Great Britain, Russia, and France have joined a moratorium on all testing. Only China continues to develop lightweight, multiple
warheads that could be deployed on submarine based missiles. Claiming discrimination, India insists it will not accede to a test ban unless the
declared nuclear states agree to give up their nuclear arsenals by a certain date. Pakistan also says if India does not sign, they wonГ•t either. One
frequently mentioned scenario is for India to conduct a quick series of tests to develop a thermonuclear weapon and only then give in to international
pressure to sign the treaty.
The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty if eventually agreed to, might not be so comprehensive after all. Meeting in Geneva the 61 nation conference on
Disarmament again failed to produce an agreed treaty before breaking up.
Negotiators will return again to produce another final effort for a test ban

Nuclear Weapons Essay
Nuclear weapons play a significant role in our understanding of international relations. As seen in the class lecture slides, states often embark on
nuclear weapons programs to counterbalance the power of other states. This is particularly true for states such as China and Iran, who are trying to
balance the power of the United States. States such as China, Russia, and the United States are all powerful international influences. This is partially
due to the fact that they are a part of the United Nations Security Council and own nuclear weapons. If they did not have nuclear weapons, it is hard
to gauge if they would be as powerful world leaders in militaristic terms if they did not have nuclear weapons. These nuclear weapons act as both
...show more content...
This is an international treaty that aims to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and technology surrounding it. This treaty also aims to promote the
peaceful use of nuclear energy, as well as disarming nuclear weapons all together. There is a total of 191 states in the treaty. China, France, Russia, the
United Kingdom, and the United States are all permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. This treaty is what allows for some states
to have nuclear weapons. Other states, such as developing nations also do not have the funds or technology to create nuclear weapons. Personally, I
cannot envision a world with without nuclear weapons. However, I can imagine a world with many more states with nuclear weapons. I think that that
is a much more feasible future due to the actions of our past. I support states sharing the technology to create nuclear weapons, so that each state is on
a level playing field. If the states that do not have nuclear weapons (or the technology to create them) were hit, they would be devastated with little to
no way to retaliate. If the technology was shared, nuclear weapons could act more offensively, in the manner that states would not launch them
knowing that once they did they would be hit right back. Nuclear weapons play a significant role in our understanding of international relations. They
are the weapons that shape the most powerful governments in the world. These weapons act both defensively and offensively because they

The Effects of Nuclear Weapons Essay
The Effects of Nuclear Weapons The United States is the most powerful country in the World. They have the biggest army, navy, and airforce, but
that is not why other countries fear them. The reason the United States is feared, is because of its nuclear capabilities. The United States has the
power to blow up the entire World without even using half of their nuclear bombs. Having all of this nuclear power is good, because it prevents other
countries from trying to go to war with the United States. The problem with these bombs is that in order to make sure they work, the United States has
to test them. There is only one way to test a nuclear bomb, and that is by letting it off. When they test these bombs, it send radiation flying...show more
content...
This bomb was tested in Los Alamos, and it was not successful. Another atomic bomb was constructed in Chicago. This bomb manufactured plutonium
by bombarding uranuim–238, with neurons. This was tested in Alamogordo, New Mexico, on July 16, 1945, and was the first explosion of an
atomic bomb1. By this time, the United States were well into World War II. They had lost thousands of men, and wanted to end this war as soon
as possible. Japan was on its last leg. Their navy had ceased to exist as an effective fighting force and the air corps had been decimated. After the
losses at Iwo Jima, and Okinawa, it looked like Japan would surrender, but they kept fighting. The United States continued bombing runs over
military targets on the Japanese mainland an integral part of their air campaign. Japan would not give up, so United States President Harry Truman
authorized the use of the atomic bomb on the morning of August 6, 1945. It was dropped on Hiroshima, and it killed over 70,000 people. Three
days later, the United States dropped another bomb on Nagasaki, killing 20,000 people instantly. Thousands more died from the after effects of the
radiation 2. The idea was that this would end the war quickly, and to save American lives. Truman's plan worked, Japan did surrender, and the war did
end shortly after, and no more American soldiers were killed. This was not the end to the

Argumentative Essay On Nuclear Weapons
Imagine a weapon that can kill 120,000 people in a blink of an eye. A weapon that can produce power of over 50 megatons of TNT. A weapon that
not only the impact of it hitting the ground is dangerous but the aftermath of the weapon is just as deadly. And if that's not enough to make you on
edge, what if I told you that this weapon can be detonated from multiple different countries in just a few minutes if they feel like it. Now are you
concerned? Well first let's figure out how and who has this control before we answer if this weapon is a problem. Nuclear energy is the energy that
holds neutrons and protons together in the nucleus of an atom. This energy is an effective way that can result in the production of electricity.
Whenever one of these physical reactions take place it engenders a slight loss in mass, however this small loss of mass generates a lot of heat
energy. This is the same principles that Albert Einstein explained with his famous equation, E=mc2. Nuclear energy, or more specifically military
nuclear energy is a "super power" or very special powerful weapon that is seen as really dangerous or defensive in the eyes of the opposing country.
How dangerous? Dangerous to the point that an average regular sized nuclear weapon that detonates over a city would burn away 40 to 65 square
miles in the blink of an eye. some countries have the privilege or curse of owning nuclear weapons. Some of these countries include: The United States,
Russia, The United Kingdom,

Nuclear Weapon Production Apocalypse
Hunter Honeycutt
Western Kentucky University Glasgow
Nuclear Weapon Production Apocalypse
If the production of nuclear weaponry is not diminished, it will cause the end of everything. With the production of nuclear weapons increasing, it will
only be a matter of time until a nuclear war breaks out. When a nuclear weapon is used, it has three killing modes. The first would be the impact, when
the bomb first hits. The second would be the shockwave that extends outward a good deal. Thirdly, the radiation effect would kill several more after that.
How does a nuclear weapon work you might ask? Well there are two ways a nuclear weapon can work. One is nuclear fission and the other is nuclear
fusion. In nuclear fission, the nucleus of an atom is split in two by a neutron. To do this, isotopes will need to be present such as uranium
(uranium–235, uranium–233) or plutonium (plutonium–239) (Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament). An isotope is the same element but with different
numbers. Nuclear fusion is kind of how the sun works. According to Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, two small atoms are fused together to create
one large atoms. This typically requires hydrogen or hydrogen isotopes (deuterium, tritium), to form a larger one (helium isotopes) (Campaign for
Nuclear Disarmament).
As stated in a previous paragraph, a nuclear weapon will kill on contact. According to a website article by History.com, the first bomb that was

Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons
Nuclear Weapons
There are many pros and cons for countries having access to nuclear weapons like atomic bombs, but some pros to having access to nuclear
weapons are to have the ability to lead countries and have the ability to manipulate choices that might be in the worst interest for the rest of the
world. Along with that another pro could be that in case of mass war or a mass takeover these weapons could be used to help allied forces recover
lost areas. A con of having these weapons of mass destruction had started around 1945 when President Harry Truman authorized the use of a nuclear
bomb in Japan that marked the end of WWII. Another con could be the problems keeping the nuclear weapons stabilized. There has been many protest,
petitions, and organizations that try to stop nuclear war in all and so far it has worked.
Firstly, I talked about the pros of having access to nuclear weapons and how it could help the right people in the right way which is not always the
case, but some good ways that they were used is in the case of the Cold War which was an almost 50–year standoff between the then Soviet Union and
the United States and only ended because the Soviet Union had fallen. Both countries were on the brink of war, but never actually went to war. The
reason being is because the USSR had found out and invented their nuclear bomb and tested the "First Lightning" (Name of the USSR first nuclear
bomb) on August 29th 1949 which marked the actual beginning of the Cold War

Argumentative Essay On Nuclear War
Caleb Dean
Mrs. Smith
English III
1 November 2017
Rough Draft
Nuclear warfare is arguably one of the darkest topics and one of the biggest threats in today's society. A Nuclear War would cause exponential chaos
and destruction to our world and many lives would be lost. Many countries have nuclear weapons at their disposal. The first people to create nuclear
weapons were the scientist at the Manhattan project. The Manhattan Project is one of the most important and technologically advanced events involving
the smartest minds of all time and changed the course of history.
In the evening of June 18th, 1942, the Manhattan project was ordered to be created by president Roosevelt. Roosevelt order this weapon to be
created because Hitler was making progress in Europe and our naval base at pearl harbor got destroyed months earlier. The man placed in control
of the project was Colonel J.C. Marshall. The main goal of the Manhattan project was to build a nuclear bomb before Germany could, it was a race
to see who would build it first and the winner of the race most likely would win the war. Because it was a race against Germany, Colonel Marshall
wanted every single aspect of the project to be kept secret. By fall of the same year that it was created they had recruited hundreds of scientists to
work on this project but it still was not enough. The scientist worked on different aspects of the creation and were not allowed to talk back in fourth
about the part of the project that they were

Nuclear weapons are one of, if not the most dangerous weapons in the world today and they are one of the biggest issues the world faces at this
current moment. They have the capability of destroying entire cities and then some that could result in millions of deaths within seconds.
Radiation from the blasts would kill even more people throughout years to come. They were first used in 1945 at the end of World War II, when
the United States dropped Little Boy and Fat Man in Hiroshima and Nagasaki to 'save' the lives of American soldiers. Since then, a nuclear arms
race was born and it's becoming more of a concern as time moves forward. Albert Einstein, who was the creator of the nuclear bomb once said "I
know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." Countries should not have access to
nuclear weapons because it destroys the environment, there is a possibility of a nuclear war that will end in mass destruction of the world, and
countries could save both revenue and resources. There are many nuclear bombing tests that happen throughout each year and it's extremely unhealthy
for the environment let alone if a nuclear war happened. According to scientists, even if a small percentage of the worlds nuclear bombs were set off
during a war, it would have an extremely devastating effect on humanity (Jha). Temperatures would drop quickly because there would be so much
black smoke in the air that the smoke would absorb

Nuclear Weapons And Its Impact On The World
Throughout history many progressions in science and technology have set us ahead of other nations both scientifically and militarily. The use of new
technology to set us ahead of other nations was imminent. With the creation of planes and tanks in the First World War the advancement of new
technology and nation destroying weapons were not far off. With the threat of the Germans creating Wonder Weapons which could win them the war
and the world we enlisted the help of defected German scientists and Americas greatest minds scientifically and military alike. With the fear of losing
hundreds of thousands of troops in japan we used the first atomic bombs setting a new world standard for warfare and changing the way our nation
was viewed. The...show more content...
Albert Einstein who escaped Nazi Germany and Enrico Fermi who escaped fascist Italy these two who defected to the United States informed the
president of the power the Axis nations were working on. With Einstein pushing President Roosevelt to research this power from splittinguranium
atoms and the President seeing no use for this he slowly started agreeing. In 1942 the Manhattan Project group is created with the idea to make the
world's first Atomic Bomb (Sherrow page 6; "The Manhattan Project" Web).
The Project was held at first out of only a few colleges, Columbia University, University of Chicago, and the University of California at Berkeley. The
same year that the project was established the first controlled nuclear reaction was achieved by Fermi and the S–1 group at the University of Chicago.
With this success more funds were placed into the project and development of the bomb. Nuclear facilities were built at Oak Ridge, Tennessee and
Hanford, Washington. The main station and bomb building plant was placed in Los Alamos, Texas with Robert Oppenheimer as the head. The main
Power source for the bomb is Uranium–235 and that that its isotope would work as a fuel source for a nuclear device. The process though of
separating Uranium–235 and Uranium–238 would prove very difficult but necessary to gain access to the fuel source (Sherrow page 7; "The Manhattan

The Pros And Cons Of A Nuclear Weapon
"There are armed adversaries of the US with nuclear weapons, including Russia, China and North Korea, with Iran now projected to have sufficient
nuclear material for a weapon as early as 2014" ( Huessy, 2013, para. 9). This really emphasizes that the while the threat of terrorist groups using a
nuclear weapon may not be probable, other countries are clearly very interested in them. "...North Korea announced in 2003 that it was building a
bomb..." (New Internationalist, 2008, para. 19). So the threat of the countries using a nuclear bomb appears to be much more likely than that of a
terrorist groups, even though a terrorist group has tried to acquire them, as the "...apocalyptic nature..." of a nuclear device appeals to extremists
(IHS.Com, 2005, para. 14). Between 1993 and 2008, there have been 421 incidents of either theft of loss of radioactive or nuclear materials, and 2
terrorist groups...show more content...
Just because a terrorist group hasn't yet acquired a nuclear weapon and used it as a weapon of mass destruction does not mean that it cannot and will not
happen in the future. In addition to the threat of them obtaining nuclear weapons, the methods that they can use to deliver the weapons to their targets
really needs to be addressed. Illegal immigration can be a method of delivering the weapons as there are approximately 20–30 million illegal
immigrants world–wide (Allison, 2010).
South Sudan, India, Israel, and Pakistan, have not signed on to the Nuclear Non–Proliferation Treaty and North Korea withdrew from the treaty in
2003 (Arms Control Association, 2005).
In conclusion, with so many different countries testing and developing nuclear devices, and so many terrorist organizations that want to acquire them,
the threat of a nuclear attack is definitely a serious

Nuclear weaponry has an extensive past. These weapons of mass destruction were introduced in World War 2 with the bombings of two major cities
in Japan as a method to end the war. Then, in the 1960s, these WMD's acted as a key part of the Cuban Crisis, which almost led to an entire war
between the Soviet Union and America. Recently, the militaristic country of North Korea has started broadcasting threats to the United States, once
again with nukes. History has repeated itself, as the world fears for its own safety again. Like many other decisions made by governments, the choice
of keeping nuclear weapons poses many questions. Why do we need them? When will we use them? What do they do? The general answers to these
questions, as explained by the governments around the world, are: A deterrence to other countries from using their own WMD's. A potential solution to
possible events that may happen in the future. A way to prevent war There are other responses too, unfortunately, these still bears a similarity by being
weak too. Many of these arguments are based upon the fact that there may be a possible future in which there may be a need for nuclear weapons. The
potential solution to a potential problem is not substantial enough to warrant their continuous support, and by keeping these weapons around, the
public is constantly living in a state of fear and panic. I believe that all governments in possession of nuclear weapons must disarm their weapons
immediately. My argument,

The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons
In this essay, the focus will be on whether or not nuclear weapons should continue to be produced, or if dismantling the world's stockpiles would be
the better decision. There is a lot of conflict going on around the world at this time. My family lived in an area where there are a lot of people from
the Middle East, so we hear a lot that tensions are extremely high. Luckily, the majority of countries that have the stockpiles of nuclear weapons are not
really involved to the point of even considering them as far as society knows. Even though it is obvious that the cons outweigh the pros, but that does
not mean that nothing good has come from , or nuclear weapons themselves.
Now to take a look at the pros. Since nuclear weapons have been used in battle (by USA only), there have been less casualties during wars. For
example, the Iraq war had a total of roughly a half of a million deaths. Now granted The Huffington Post and The Lead Author of the study, Amy
Hagopian, outed that this includes "all indirect deaths..."(Hagopian, 2013). In comparison, there were far more deaths in World War One. With all
allied forces along with the countries against them, the total deaths equaled 37,466,904(PBS, 2015), With simple math, that equals 74 times as many
deaths as after nuclear weapons were invented. That number is astonishing! This is just a simple comparison and more than likely there are some wars
that had less as well.
The formula and technology that led to the nuclear bomb has

Argumentative Essay On Nuclear Weapons
It's 2028 and the two nuclear giants are fighting against each other. Thousands dead, buildings in ashes and many hopes destroyed. Yet the worst is
yet to come. The temperature of the world is decreasing to new records and is staying like that for many years to come. This is a nuclear winter that
many scientists have predicted for decades. Anuclear weapon uses either uranium or plutonium. They work by using a nuclear reaction which
breaks down an atom or nucleus into two pieces. This process produces a significant amount of energy which leads to an explosion. (Chan) A
nuclear weapon can also be as big as a refrigerator or as small as a warhead. (Daniel) The first nuclear weapon was made in the 1930s known as the
"Manhattan Project" made by the U.S. This project was suspended after Hitler was killed, but the U. S. used the weapon due to Japan attacking
Pearl Harbor. This attack put the U. S. in a rage, so the U. S had a plan to use the weapon and another nuclear weapon. The U. S dropped a bomb
named "Little Boy" on Hiroshima, which followed with the biggest explosion ever witnessed. Then the U. S dropped another bomb. (Lemouse) This
was the first and last time anyone used a nuclear bomb, for now. While several people in the government and regular citizens argue that nuclear
weaponry is stopping from giving any threats, but nuclear weaponry is actually causing an environmental turmoil and a radiation that will affect
everyone in the vicinity for many ages to come.
Today,

Nuclear Weapons &Amp; Nuclear Warfare Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Can Someone Write My Paper For Me Moberly

More from Can Someone Write My Paper For Me Moberly (8)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Nuclear Weapons &Amp; Nuclear Warfare Essay