Apology, By Plato 's Apology
"I know, I do not know," are the words that constitute Socrates' philosophy that "The only true
wisdom is in knowing you know nothing." In "Apology," written by Plato, this ethical belief makes a
bold appearance demonstrating that true ignorance only revolves around those who think that they
know everything. In "Apology," Socrates learns that the wisest men are those who do not think of
themselves of wise, and rather make an approach of going beyond an authentic method of inquiry
and helping others seek their personal philosophies which may result in conflict. In Plato's
"Apology," Socrates demonstrates that introspection is the key to living life with purpose.
Socrates knowing himself, held in certain that he had "no wisdom small or great" (Plato, trans.
1871). Upon hearing the prophecy about him from the Oracle of Delphi asserting that there was
"no man wiser" than him in all of Athens, he became puzzled (Plato, trans. 1871). In response to
the message about him from the Oracle of Delphi, Socrates felt obliged to disprove this statement
by seeking a wiser man, and once found he would refute the prophecy by affirming to God "Here is
a man who is wiser than I am; but you said that I was the wisest"(Plato, trans. 1871). Socrates
embarked on a search for men with "the reputation of wisdom." First, he interrogated a politician,
then the poets, and then artisans. While questioning the politician, he found that "although he was
thought wise by many, and wiser still
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Apology Plato Essay
Melinda Leager
PHIL 201–03/04/08
Instructor: Dr. Dennis L. Burke
September 7, 2012
Response Paper
"The Apology" by Plato
In this reading Plato tells the story of Socrates and his trial which ultimately lead to his death
sentence. Socrates was a 70 year old man at peace with his own mortality yet willing to face his
accusers with an almost definite possibility of death to maintain his own integrity and beliefs and
morality. He fully understood from the beginning of his trial what the sentence handed down would
be yet on a level of honor and courage not seen in abundance in modern society he maintained his
stance and delivered a compelling and convincing argument. He openly stated that he knew his
actions had offended Meletus and...show more content...
He knew his fate from the beginning yet still stood his ground and made a very convincing argument.
In today's society there are individuals that depend on followers to conform to their beliefs and
what they feel is right or wrong. We are currently a nation at war and have been for many years
for different reasons. As a result of this, there is obviously diversity when it comes to civilian,
political and military beliefs. We have soldiers that are willing to fight and die for the country they
believe in to show true faith and allegiance to their nation and its President, politicians that fight for
their bills and laws to be passed, and citizens who choose every day to either support the war or
question our involvement in it. People fight for animal rights, gay and lesbian marriage rights and so
much more. All this said, Socrates stood up for what he believed in, in "The Apology" and in an
essence to this day it can be compared to modern day society and individuals or groups standing up
for what they believe in.
In conclusion, everyone is entitled to their own opinions, beliefs and moral values. Though there
are rules and laws set forth by our government to maintain a sense of order and acceptable behavior.
We as humans are compelled to defend our beliefs and accept the consequences set forth by our
beliefs. I am a true

Apology for Poetry Essay
An "Apology for Poetry" is a compelling essay refuting the attack on poetry by Puritan and
fundamentalist Stephen Gosson. This complex article written by Sir Phillip Sidney represents the
decisive rebuttal defending poetry. His strong emotive passages defend the uncongenial comments of
poetry from Gosson. Although, his justification for the rebuttal is alluded to Gosson's durable
attacks on poetry; it is known Gosson's remarks prompt Sidney's attitude to defend not only against
Gosson but as well as Plato. Stephen Gosson's Puritan credentials, disregards him as the primary
source for submitting the essay.
Sidney addresses the poetic contributions and principles demonstrated by Aristotle, Plato, and other
European scholars. Plato's...show more content...
Sidney agrees with Plato's doctrine that educational instruction is moral excellence and a capacity
of universal knowledge which equips a mature virtuous man. To further the protection of poetry, he
interprets Aristotle's quote concerning the form of poetry as, "all virtues, vices and passions so in
their own natural state laid out to the view that we seem not to hear of them but clearly to see
through them (An Apology for Poetry 140). Nature provides its own natural resources for man to
achieve universal knowledge; if man allows the aesthetics of nature to implement his mind, all
virtues are achieved. Sidney acknowledges and makes frequent references of the essence to Plato's
"the beauty of virtue" (Samuel 387). Throughout the essay, Sidney validates Plato's conception,
"Like the painter who portrays not Lucretia, whom he never saw, but the outward beauty of such a
virtue, the form of goodness–which seen, they cannot but love" (Samuel 387). Plato's profound
theory on aesthetics is a significant pathway to poetry, because poetry is beautiful and man cannot
help but to love moral excellence.
Sidney upholds the truth and defense against the Socratic charges opposing poetry, "the poet,
nothing affirmth, he therefore never lieth". He delivers the expression that poetry is the truer ideal
then other earthly being. "The defense of poetry as a mimetic art has already been made in the
assertion that poetry

Plato's Apology Essay
Plato's Apology
In the retelling of his trial by his associate, Plato, entitled "The Apology"; Socrates claims in his
defense that he only wishes to do good for the polis. I believe that Socrates was innocent of the
accusations that were made against him, but he possessed contempt for the court and displayed that
in his conceitedness and these actions led to his death. In his defense, Socrates claims over and again
that he is innocent and is not at all wise, "...for I know that I have no wisdom, small or great."
Throughout the rest of his oration he seems to act the opposite as if he is better than every man,
and later he even claims that, "At any rate, the world has decided that Socrates is in some way
superior to other...show more content...
In these, he tested to see how wise so–called wise men were and each and every time he claimed that
these men were not wise at all. Socrates went and tested all sorts of men from poets, politicians,
and artisans. He claimed that all were inferior to him because they claimed to know much when
they knew not much at all. And that, although he did not know all the tings these men knew, he
was still wiser. He went so far as to tell these men what he thought, and even stated all these
feelings in the court. This, no doubt, led to his general hatred more than any other act. But I
wonder, had anyone ever questioned Socrates? And on what basis did he judge wisdom? Socrates
claimed that a man who thought themselves the wisest were the least, but that is exactly what he
was, a man who thought himself the wisest. Maybe he was the type of person to dislike any man
who's intellect challenged his own. "Is there not here conceit of knowledge, which is a disgraceful
sort of ignorance? And this is the point in which, as I think, I am superior to men in general."
Socrates claims to be most all virtuous. "I tell you that virtue is not given by money, but as from
virtue come money and every other good of man...". Funny that Socrates also claims to be "in rags".
In yet another contradiction, Socrates states that he will not cry and mention the fact that he has
family and sons, and beg for an

Letter Of Apology And Apology Essay
Picture it: June 6, 2011 a warm Texas summer evening and I, a uniformed patrolled officer, have
arrived to work to start a twelve–hour shift when I find a sealed letter by the County Prosecutor in
my mail box. I am certain that it is not a subpoena as those are never sealed and always hand
delivered but imagine my surprise when I read what the County Attorney has sent. I find a letter of
explanation from him and an apology from a juvenile that I had pursued in a foot chase earlier that
year. The County Attorney explains that he cannot discuss the prosecution of a juvenile but that
the juvenile in question has taken responsibility for his actions and as such has included a letter of
apology composed by the juvenile. The following page dated April 15, 2011 reveals that this
juvenile, Efrain, has indeed enclosed a letter of apology for running from the police and states his
actions were wrong and that he wanted to apologize for those actions and furthermore, he expressed
his desire to complete high school and stay out of trouble.
When this paper was first assigned, I thought about Efrain and how he was not that remarkable nor
was his crime. However, Efrain's letter of apology, whether required by the terms of his probation
or the result of his own sheer desire, was the only one I have ever received from a juvenile
offender and as such, it stayed with me. I have the honor and privilege of serving a good community
but I have now been employed long enough that the adults that I

Socrates Arguments In The Apology
According to the majority of the jury members of Athens, Socrates is a corruption to the youth,
doer of evil and does not agree with the gods of his people. In the Apology, written by Plato these
are the assumptions and accusations Socrates is held in court for. In court, he is faced with what
most men fear, being wrongly accused leading to the death sentence. Socrates argues and strives to
prove that he has no fear of being hated, being accused of serious crimes, being threatened with
punishment, or being put to death. One of the arguments that Socrates first shows throughout the
Apology is that he is being guided by the work of his Gods. He says that he is not scared to be
hated because he knows that many people in Athens only dislike...show more content...
He knows that when he is put to death, they will be the ones at a loss of his knowledge and true
wisdom. He still believes he has gained no reasons to think that he can lose in death as his acts were
not for material gain (28–29). Socrates has shown no fear for being hated by the majority of
Athens, yet still finds himself being accused of serious crimes leading to his death. Socrates has
shown he has no fear in being accused of crimes he knows he didn't do. He gives explanation by
saying that if you are accused of mothing you didn't do they accusers will be the ones in pain from
the loss and wrong doing. He goes about explaining how he has never charged or tried to seek
material good for his teachings, he only wanted to help people through their own wisdom. While in
court they go through all of his accusations and Socrates has no struggle disproving his guilt and
proving them wrong. He explains that the accusers offer no witnesses to the charge and even if
they charged him he could not pay for it because he is poor (28). Socrates is a selfless man as seem
through his actions that is only trying to prove his knowledge through wisdom and teachings. While
in court Socrates was accused of not believing in the Gods of Athens. He goes on to explain that he
does believe in the gods, he states that one cannot teach spiritual things without believing in the
Gods themselves and cherishing their worth. He backs this up with the statement that

Socrates Defense Speech In The Apology By Plato
The Apology is a written work by Plato. It is considered a realistic account of Socrates' defense
speech in court. Plato was a student and admirer of Socrates. Due to this, Plato was present at
Socrates court hearing, and it can be concluded Plato probably wrote accurately about Socrates'
defense speech. The Apology detailed Socrates' rebuttal to the charges brought against him. These
charges included Socrates manifesting new gods, teaching and corrupting the youth, and teaching
how to skillfully win an argument using clever rhetoric. Throughout Apology, Socrates used his
persuasive speaking skills to influence the emotions, feelings, and mental state of his audience, the
people of Athens.
The jury debated over death or a fine for Socrates....show more content...
He tries to persuade the people of Athens they will have more frustration by sentencing him to
death. Socrates declares revenge would come to them; they will experience something more painful
then his death. Socrates states, "you will have more critics, whom up till now I have restrained
without your knowing it; and being younger they will be harsher to you and will cause you more
annoyance" (Plato 68). Socrates tried to persuade his audience that executing him will not stop the
problem. Words such as annoyance, harsh, restrained are powerful words used by Socrates. He is
trying to show the people of Athens the frustration they have towards Socrates now will be even
worse by sentencing him to death. There are more people like him, and they will replace him.
There are his students that will pass on his teachings. Therefore, there will be more frustration,
anger, and annoyance to be dealt with by the jury. His students will probably continue Socrates'
teachings. By Socrates saying this, it has possibly helped and hurt his argument. On one hand, he is
forcing the jury to think allowing Socrates to live will prevent an uproar from his followers. On the
other hand, this would enrage the jury due to Socrates creating more thinkers like

Apology On The Book Apology
The book Apology begins with Socrates making a short speech in which he defends his innocence.
He was on trial because of the two "Later" charges against him. Corrupting the youth and disbelief
in Athenian gods were among the charges. Before he began his speech, he made it clear to the
judges that he is not familiar with the court system and also that it's his first time in court so that he
will be speaking in his "usual manner". His accusers warned the judges that he has a great
persuasive power. However, Socrates insisted that he makes no claim of being so persuasive in his
speeches. He stated to the judges that, he doesn't exaggerate or give false information to mislead
them. He told the judges that, his accusers should be ashamed for even suggesting that he would
mislead them by the force of his persuasive skills. Socrates insisted, the only type of eloquent
language he will use will be truth. He asked the judges to deliver justice and justice only, and to
avoid considering his manner of speech. Socrates presented two arguments to defend himself from
the charges. Socrates accusation started even before he was present for his first trial in court. One of
the older accusation was based on people's assumption that he flew on the clouds and thought
Philosophy. (Commentary on Plato 's
Apology of Socrates) Socrates pointed out how Aristophanes in his comedy play depicted Socrates
as a super human that could walk on the air. He stated the play was exaggerated and has given

The Speech Act Of Apology
1.1 Statement of the problem Speech acts can be defined as things people do when they speak.
This means that they use the language to tell information, make request and express feelings and
attitudes, etc. The speech act of apology is an act used by people to express their feelings and
attitudes about certain situations and settings. Apologies are very important in resolving
conflicts. They aim at maintaining and reforming social fracture caused by the offence done by
the speaker. Speech act of apology is of great significance in drama, and this ascribes to the fact
that drama is trying to assemble everyday life events. Within the speech act of apology, there are
two parties, i.e. the offender and offended. The apology is directed to the offended party. This
study is an attempt to clarify sociopragmatically the differences between the two languages,
English and the Arabic, in expressing and reflecting the speech act of apology. Apology is
usually performed between parties of different or the same status. Accordingly, the study shows
how different people apologize to others, yet with a various reaction in each time they apologize
on the basis of their social and cultural norms. The speech act of apology is socially based and
depend on the notion of face. It involves two acts of face: face threatening act and face saving act.
People, in general, usually aim at being free of impositions and socially appreciated. Apology is
highly common in drama as it reflects

The Apology of Socrates Essay examples
Socrates is at the age of seventy and appearing in a law court for the first time. For the people of
Socrates time is accusing Socrates, for miss leading the youth corrupting them and boasting about
being wise, causing him to become very unpopular. Socrates says to the jury I am going to speak the
whole truth, for it is me by myself that I have to defend. He says my accusers are many and I don't
know them, they say, "you should be careful not be deceived by an accomplished speaker like me"
(Cohen, Curd, & Reeve, 2000). The accuser goes on to say that Socrates is accomplished speaker;
Socrates starts to praise them, because their lies are so good well put together, that Socrates himself
is almost convinced but then he says that they do not...show more content...
This made Socrates very unpopular. "As a result of this investigation, gentleman of the jury, I
acquired much unpopularity, of a kind that is hard to deal with and is a heavy burden; many
slanders came from these people and a reputation for wisdom, for in each case the bystanders
thought that I myself possessed the wisdom that I proved that my interlocutor did not have" (Cohen,
et al., 2000).
Socrates says that the young men follow me, but not on my account they try to imitate what I say,
which causes their fathers to be angry with me. Socrates says I have been accused of corrupting
the youth, but I say Meletus is guilty of such things. For it is Meletus who does not believe in the
gods of the city and corrupting the youth, Socrates and Meletus start to argue about the rights and
wrongs of the law. Socrates proves his point by saying that Meletus contradicts himself, for he say
that Socrates doesn't believe in gods but Socrates I do believe in the gods.
Socrates then tells the story of Troy and how Hector son of a king heir to the throne kills Achilles
friend Patroclus, during the battle. This made Achilles very vengeful; his mother the goddess
warned Achilles if you kill Hector out of vengeance you too will die. Achilles said to go home
would be a coward move and it will be a great disgrace. What Socrates is trying to say even

Apology Essay
I am not so certain if Socrates' approach to his defense is particularly the brightest one, and it
certainly is not an apology as the title has named it, but, there is a certain wisdom in the simple,
plain structured arguments he presents. One of the first things he mentions, is for the jury to
pardon him, in the case that he should slip into his accustomed way of speaking, just as they
would pardon a foreigner for speaking in his accustomed manner. This appears to me to be a wise
idea, as it is true, even in today's society that we tend to judge people on face value. People who do
not speak English well, as Socrates would not have spoken "court language" very well,
tend to be jusdged as stupid. Socrates next points out that...show more content...
He points this out, thus probably causing the jury to examine themselves, to realize that they may
have already convicted him before he even spoke, and to actually listen to what he says afterward.
Through all of this, Socrates continues to claim that he is not wise. This brings into question what
the real deffinition of wise is. In Socrates' case, he claims that he is not wise, and the oracle must
have been referring to him as wise because he knows that he knows nothing for certain. The irony of
this, is that he claims to know nothing, and then proves every man he questions or talks to, to know
even less than him, or at least not more than Socrates.
From a scientific point of view, I can completely understand this way of thinking, that the only way
to be wise is to question everything. In science, you must question everything, and accept nothing as
complete truth. If scientists had accepted without question that the sun revolved around the earth, or
that life spontaneously generated from non–living matter, would we be the technological scince–rich
society we are today? In science, you cannot blindly accept knowledge without first investigating it.
This is what Socrates is doing, except on a larger scale. He is taking all knowledge, and examining it.
In

Socrates (Defense), the Apology Essay
Socrates – "The Apology" or (Defense)
Socrates had no written work, never had a job and there are questions of whether he was even
literate. However, Plato was a student of Socrates and recorded what occurred at his death trial.
Socrates asked lots of questions and made people with political power look stupid.
At no time during his trial does he claim to be innocent. He (attacks his accuser instead)
There were two types of charges brought against him. – The new or (Official) Charges– which is
why he was brought to trial o "He corrupts the youth" o "He disses the Old Gods and tosses props
(credits) to New Gods." – Old Charges (Rumors/Not Official) o "He makes the weaker argument
defeat...show more content...
.....Meteltus, you claim I corrupt the youth, correct?
Meletus: Yep
Socr: If you care so much about the youth, that you know who corrupts them, you must also know
who helps them. Who is that?
M: The Laws
S: No, give me a name. How about the Judges? Do they benefit or corrupt the youth?
M: Benefit
S; The Jury?
M: Benefit
S: Audience?
M: Benefit
S: Rest of Athens?
M: Benefit
S: Everyone but me benefits the youth except me?
M: Yup
S; That is dope wacky. There is no way that makes sense. How do you best train a horse with one
or a few or with several? With one or a few of course, it is impossible that only one person corrupts.
Meletus you obviously only care about hurting me and not helping the youh.
S; Meletus, don't you agree that people you treat well treat you well in erturn? And those you harm
will come to harm you? So if I were corrupting the youth wouldn't that come back to haun me.
Either I have made an unwitty mistake or I am crazy. Either way I should have been talked to first
instead of being brought to trial. All you care about is hurting me.
2nd Charge Disses Old Gods, tosses props to New Gods
S: Meletus, le me be sure that I understand this charge – do you claim I believe in New gods or in No
Gods at all?
M: You do not believe in any Gods at all! [Here Meletus is trying to makeSocrates look bad]

S: So I wonder what could 'New Gods' be? If New Gods are not really Gods, the can be people, so
maybe they are like fairies and spirits. Can

Speech Analysis : ' The Apology '
The speech title is deceiving to the eye, this speech isn't even an apology, and it's more of defense
speech. Socrates uses the speech to defend his accusations against him. In the story, "The Apology"
Socrates is on trial for accusation like, "corrupting the youth" and "impiety." Through this following
essay, According the following: what Socrates means ofknowledge or wisdom and why he thought
that knowledge/wisdom was the best means of happiness and perfecting the soul, what kind of
knowledge is the best, how did he react to the oracle, and what we thought about his accusations in
the court and if we think he deserved his punishment.
First of all, Socrates defines knowledge as, acknowledging the limits of one's own knowledge. In
"the Apology," Socrates defines it as, "I know that I know nothing." When he was questioning the
politicians, he found out they were very wise, but they didn't know much of anything. After them he
questioned the poets and the poets seemed to be incapable of explaining their well–known works.
Socrates came to the conclusion that their intellect didn't come from their wisdom, but from their
instinct or inspiration which is no way connected to their intellect. Several bystanders take Socrates
to be an expert in the fields, in which he questions others, he denies of any expertise, and interprets
the oracle as saying that the wisest of men are men like Socrates who humbly accept that their
wisdom is deficient. He claimed he was wise, in the limited

Plato's The Apology Essay
"How you have felt, O men of Athens, at hearing the speeches of my accusers, I cannot tell; but I
know that their persuasive words almost made me forget who I was – such was the effect of them;
and yet they have hardly spoken a word of truth." – Plato "The Apology"
In "The Apology," Socrates represents himself in his own trial. He boldly questions the morality of
the people of court. In this report, I will be analyzing portions of "The Apology" in order to reveal the
intellectuality of this text within this time frame. I will only discuss bits of "The Apology" on
account that it is a lengthy piece. However, before discussing the speech it is important to set the
scene. Socrates was born in 469 B.C.E. and lived to 399 B.C.E. (Nails, 2014)....show more content...
Under this regime was Socrates sentenced to death.
"The Apology" allows not only for us to conceptualize Socrates' trail, but it also provides a
glimpse of the way the government was set up in this time. In "The Apology," Socrates is
summoned to a trail based on accusations convicting him of impious beliefs and corrupting the
youth. Socrates, first, addresses the charges of corrupting the youth. He begins by stating that
Meletus could care less about matters concerning children. He, then, inquires if Meletus
"...think[s] a great deal about the improvement of youth..." (Lawall, 786). To this Meletus
responds with an earnest answer. "Yes, I do" (p.786). Socrates responds with a sequence of
questions regarding Meletus's view of the "improver" of children. Meletus answers these
questions with simple answers; he names the laws judges, senators, and "the members of the
assembly." (p. 786) To each of Meletus's responses, Socrates has an antithetical reply. Socrates
generally refutes this charge by comparing the care of horses to the care of children. "Does one
man do them [horses] harm and all the world good? Is not the exact opposite the truth?" (786). He
goes on to say that the world would be a much better place if all but one person were virtuous. He,
then, asks if it is better to live among the good or the bad. Meletus agrees that it is better to live
among the good (786). Socrates asks if his corruption of the children is intentional or unintentional

The Apology Of Socrates
The Apology of Socrates is a Plato's version of speeches given by Socrates who was accused for
two main reasons: the corruption of the youth and impiety (not believing in gods in whom the city
believes). In the Apology Socrates tries to defend himself and his actions but not to apologize for it.
He insisted that he must be wiser than others because he knows and recognizes that knows nothing.
The Apology by Plato shows that there is a great influence of Socrates in searching for the truth
about humanity and society even when his attempt contradicted with the opinions of the "many".
Introduction
The Apology was written by Plato, and relates Socrates' defense at his trial on charges of corrupting
the youth and impiety....show more content...
Socrates tells them that he will speak the truth, and pleads the judges to think of the justice of his
cause but not minding the style of his speech. In making his defense, Socrates will reply to two
kinds of accusations. At first, he refers to the older charges and his first accusers, and secondly he
replies to the accusations made by Meletus, Anytus, and Lycon. He was afraid of the older
accusers most of all and the reason behind this dread was that his accusers were many and he
couldn't call them all by name. These accusers' falsely claims can be summed up in the following
words: "Socrates is an evil–doer, and a curious person, who searches into things under the earth and
in heaven, and he makes the worse appear the better cause; and he teaches the aforesaid doctrines to
others." He responses to these falsehoods by arguing that he has nothing to do with the physical
sciences nor is he paid for giving instruction–he has nothing to teach. He then goes on to explain how
he gained such a bad reputation. The impetuous Chaerephon had gone to Delphi and asked the
oracle if there was any man wiser than Socrates; and the answer was, that there was no man wiser.
After a long consideration Socrates thinks of a method of trying a question. He goes to one who had
the reputation of wisdom and selects a politician for

Plato's Apology Essay
Plato's Apology
Plato's Apology is the story of the trial of Socrates, the charges brought against him and his
maintaining of his own innocence throughout the process. At the onset of the trial, Socrates appears
to challenging the charges, which included corrupting the youth, challenging belief in the gods that
were accepted and reveled by the State, and introducing a new religious focus, but also belittles his
own significance and suggesting that he will not attempt to disprove that he participated in the
actions maintained by the court. In essence, Socrates appears almost self–effacing, and his defense
surprises even his accuser, Meletus. But by the end of the Apology, Socrates becomes almost a
different person,...show more content...
Early in the Apology, Socrates argues that the charges of Meletus are not only false, but have led to
the rise of prejudice against him, and he demonstrates this through what he considers his own
reflection on the charges against him. Socrates suggests the indictment against him should read:
"Socrates is guilty of engaging in inquiries into things beneath the earth and in the heaven, of making
the weaker argument appear the stronger, and of teaching others the same things". Socrates suggests
that the breadth of the indictment against him could encompass the premises supported by many
men, and that it is only through the prejudice against him, the belief in his wisdom purported by
some, and the sense that Socrates has influenced men that has resulted in the charges, not through
the true belief that Socrates has taken actions against the State.
Perhaps it is the divided sentiments of the vote that impact Socrates, or perhaps just his realization
that from the onset, he would have been condemned not matter what his arguments, but Socrates
appears to transform himself after the votes are cast. Socrates is given the opportunity to propose an
alternative sentence to the death penalty proposed by Meletus, and many men would have begged
for mercy, asked for forgiveness, claimed to repent for their actions, and request leniency. Socrates,
though, demonstrates not only his strength in his

Apology Letter For Apology Essay
Thanks for considering me for the employment. I extremely apologize to write you this email. I
received an offer from another company two days ago. They called me and told me to respond to
them soon. That's why I accepted that offer just this morning. Now, I cannot go back to join
Poggemeyer Design Group, Inc. I hope you will pardon me regarding this

Plato's Apology And Religion
When reading Plato's Apology, a central theme is found; religion. Religion played a key role in
society, in fact, society was wrapped around religion. Athenians felt threatened by Socrates when he
started claiming that there were other explanations for what the Athenians believed was the Gods'
works. Meletus of the second class accuses Socrates of being a "doer of evil, who corrupts the
youth; and who does not believe in the gods of the state, but has other new divinities of his own".
Meletus' claim is the severest of them all, because religion is so important to Athenians. Religion is
taken seriously, and unlike the United States today, Athenians did not get to choose what they
worshipped and believed in. Socrates defended himself by saying

Socrates As Depicted In Plato's Apology
Found guilty and sentenced to death, the Apology was about the trial of Socrates written by Plato.
Socrates was charged because the state believe that he was creating new gods rather than the ones
they were used to. This caused conflict for the reason that the state thought he was corrupting and
harming the youth of Athens. Thus, the Apology is the speech presented by Socrates through the
eye–witness account of Plato. Socrates spent the rest of his life wandering Athens. Although many
people considered him to be a teacher, he rejected that label because these teachers (sophists) taught
others how to use language skillfully through reddrick in order to manipulate others. Socrates
thought otherwise and rejected their teachings because he thought language was used to discover
what is true and knowledgeable. In the Apology, he mentions that he believes that he has not taught
anything because he simply does not know anything. Socrates explains himself why people seem to
dislike him and explains that it is because people are angered from the wisdom Socrates has. The
Oracle Delphi once said that no one is wiser than Socrates. Of course Socrates was stunned because,
as aforementioned, he does not know anything. He wanted to find out if someone truly had wisdom
so he tested the wisdom of artisans, poets, sophists, politicians, and could not come up with anything
because their reasons were not justified. He came with the conclusion that humans are "foolish little
insects." He also

Essay about PlatoвЂ™s Apology
Plato's Apology
Socrates was a very simple man who did not have many material possessions and spoke in a plain,
conversational manner. Acknowledging his own ignorance, he engaged in conversations with people
claiming to be experts, usually in ethical matters. By asking simple questions, Socrates gradually
revealed that these people were in fact very confused and did not actually know anything about the
matters about which they claimed to be an expert. Socrates felt that the quest for wisdom and the
instruction of others through dialogue and inquiry were the highest aims in life. He felt that "The
unexamined life is not worth living." Plato's Apology is the speech Socrates made at his trial.
Socrates was charged with not recognizing the...show more content...
He believed that the reason he was put on trial was because he embarrassed many people. Socrates
compared himself to a gadfly stinging the lazy horse, which is the Athenian state. Without him,
Socrates claimed, the state would drift into a deep sleep, but through his influence it can be
awakened. Socrates was found guilty by a narrow margin and was asked to come up with a penalty.
Socrates suggested that if he were to get what he deserved, he should be honored with a great meal
for being of such service to the state. He rejected the sentences of prison or exile, offering instead to
pay a fine. When the jury rejected his suggestions and sentenced him to death, Socrates accepted the
verdict and said that no one but the gods know what happens after death and so it would be foolish
to fear what one does not know. He also warned the people who voted against him that by silencing
him rather than listening to him, they have harmed themselves much more than they have harmed
him.
Socrates opened his case by asking the jury to listen to him openly and to pardon him if he went
into his usual style of speaking. His accusers had already spoken against him in the flowery
manner common in courts of law. Socrates said that his accusers' speeches contained great
refinement and skill, and he lacked the ability to speak so well. However, he said that he would
speak the truth while his opponents lied. Socrates also stated that while his accusers' speeches were

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Buy Essays Online For College Sioux Falls

More from Buy Essays Online For College Sioux Falls (13)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)