In 2022, in the case of Thaler v. Vidal, the Federal Circuit affirmed that only natural persons (i.e., human beings) can be named inventors on U.S. patents, thereby excluding artificial intelligence from being listed as an inventor. But while the court’s decision blocked a potentially radical extension of patent rights, it has done nothing to calm growing worries that AI is threatening to upend other aspects of IP law. Use of AI tools such as generative AI (ChatGPT) for new inventions do not pose a challenge for now. However, are the IP laws equipped to handle the possibility when AI systems design own inventions? How will the human inventors compete with AI generated inventions? Will it be fair to human inventors? As the capabilities of AI advances, the question arises: Should patents for inventions by AI have a shorter lifespan than those created by humans? We discuss some compelling reasons for favouring a shorter patent life for AI-created inventions.