The Patna Case was a legal case that took place in India between 1777 and 1779. It is considered an important case because it revealed the country's judicial administration system. The case also highlighted the conflict between the Supreme Court and the supreme council. The case involved Nauderah Begum, who was trying to recover her inheritance. The Supreme Court supported Begum against the interests of her deceased husband's nephew. The case also identified defects in the company's judicial system in Mofussil.

1. Present by- Asiqul Islam

2. Introduction
Facts Of The Case
Issues And The Decision
Conclusion

3. Introduction
The Patna case is one of the important cases
because it revealed the judicial administration
system of the country. It brought into notice the
conflict between the Supreme Court and the
supreme council and made it clear that there
should be proper reorganization for the justice in
the future. This case took place between the
years 1777-1779.

4. Facts of The Case
The case involves ShahbagBez Khan, an ex-
military officer from Kabul who settled in Patna
after retiring and married Nadira Begum. Upon his
death in 1776, a property dispute emerged
between his widow and adopted nephew. The
nephew petitioned the provincial council in Patna,
asserting his adoption and right to the estate.
Nadira Begum, the widow, based her claim on
dower, gift deed, and acknowledgement.

5. Facts of The Case
The court directed Muslim officers, Kazi and Mufti,
to seal the property. However, their actions led to
the abuse of Nadira Begum, who sought refuge in
a 'Dargah.' The case argued over the validity of the
documents, with the Provincial Council favoring the
nephew. Dissatisfied, Nadira Begum approached
Calcutta's SadarDiwaniAdalat, also filing a suit
against Kazi and Mufti for alleged damages of six
lakhs.

6. Issues and The Decision
In this case, the key issue questioned whether Bahadur Beg,
residing beyond Calcutta's jurisdiction, was bound by its laws,
and if law officers could be penalized for actions in their official
capacity. The Court ruled that due process was ignored,
witnesses were not sworn in, and officers exceeded their
official roles. Consequently, a sum of Rs. 3 lakhs was awarded
to the Begum. This case highlighted deficiencies in judicial
administration, particularly within agricultural contexts under
administrative wards. It exposed weaknesses in the
organization of the judicial system, exemplified by the Patna
case, revealing instances of officials exercising extra power
and jurisdiction.

7. Conclusion
Thus, the Patna case is an important judgment in the
study of the legal system that has been developed in the
country. However, in spite of all the shortcomings, the
Supreme Court gave a favorable decision in the same.

8. Any Questions?